Re: [OSRM-talk] Is STXXL still used in the wild?
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 13:27, Frédéric Rodrigo wrote: > > Le 15/06/2020 à 11:39, Mateusz Loskot a écrit : > > On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 11:46, Denis Chapligin wrote: > >> I was building libraries for a windows build and discovered that STXXL is > >> abandonware atm > > "OSRM is essentially abandonware at this point" too > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2020-March/001849.html > > > It is not totally true. There is still a community, but without access > to the github repository as commiter. > > Ask was already made to reaming people with access, to name new > commiters and allow the community to take the project. Some commits are being made and PRs are being merged. So, I'd suggest to keep submitting PRs and keep on nudging maintainers, whoever is available out there. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [OSRM-talk] Is STXXL still used in the wild?
Le 15/06/2020 à 11:39, Mateusz Loskot a écrit : On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 11:46, Denis Chapligin wrote: I was building libraries for a windows build and discovered that STXXL is abandonware atm "OSRM is essentially abandonware at this point" too https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2020-March/001849.html Best regards, It is not totally true. There is still a community, but without access to the github repository as commiter. Ask was already made to reaming people with access, to name new commiters and allow the community to take the project. Frédéric Rodrigo. ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [OSRM-talk] Is STXXL still used in the wild?
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 12:51, Denis Chapligin wrote: > пн, 15 июн. 2020 г. в 12:40, Mateusz Loskot : >> >> On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 11:46, Denis Chapligin wrote: >> > >> > I was building libraries for a windows build and discovered that STXXL is >> > abandonware atm >> >> "OSRM is essentially abandonware at this point" too >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2020-March/001849.html >> >> > > And I'm really concerned about that :( Me too. > Regarding STXXL presence - yep, i know it's optional, but it _may_ be an > issue for c++17 introduction ;) If I was about to do it, I would do this: 1. Submit PR wiping out all traces of STXXL 2. Submit PR bumping required C++ version to C++17 with minimal code modernisation to enable compilation as C++17 3. Continue with series of manageable PRs modernising code to C++17 I honestly expect such PRs will be accepted as I see no practical reasons to not to. I should be able to offer my help in reviewing and testing the PRs, as well as submitting some for the 3. part. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [OSRM-talk] Is STXXL still used in the wild?
Hello! пн, 15 июн. 2020 г. в 12:40, Mateusz Loskot : > On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 11:46, Denis Chapligin wrote: > > > > I was building libraries for a windows build and discovered that STXXL > is abandonware atm > > "OSRM is essentially abandonware at this point" too > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2020-March/001849.html > > > And I'm really concerned about that :( Regarding STXXL presence - yep, i know it's optional, but it _may_ be an issue for c++17 introduction ;) ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [OSRM-talk] C++17?
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 11:45, Denis Chapligin wrote: > > Looks like all major OSRM platforms have stable support for C++17. > Are there any reasons to stay on C++14? > Any objections against language version update? +1 a vote from OSRM user, occasional contributor Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [OSRM-talk] Is STXXL still used in the wild?
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 11:46, Denis Chapligin wrote: > > I was building libraries for a windows build and discovered that STXXL is > abandonware atm "OSRM is essentially abandonware at this point" too https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2020-March/001849.html Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [OSRM-talk] Is STXXL still used in the wild?
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 11:46, Denis Chapligin wrote: > > i would like to ask, are there any actual users of STXXL left Although it won't make for any useful statistics, I have never built OSRM w/ STXXL enabled. > and are the any objections of dropping STXXL support from the OSRM? FYI, STXXL is optional, so you can already build OSRM as if STXXL support was dropped. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
