Re: [OSRM-talk] Is STXXL still used in the wild?
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 13:48, Denis Chapligin wrote: > пн, 15 июн. 2020 г. в 15:47, Mateusz Loskot : >> >> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 13:27, Frédéric Rodrigo >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Ask was already made to reaming people with access, to name new >> > commiters and allow the community to take the project. >> >> Some commits are being made and PRs are being merged. >> So, I'd suggest to keep submitting PRs and keep on nudging >> maintainers, whoever is available out there. >> > > So I made a PR [0] to remove STXXL, let's see if it will be merged or not. > > [0] https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5760 Denis, Am I correct you are a committer to the OSRM? Can you see any way to get someone involved in the review of the PR or perhaps grant you permission to merge it? The situation is weird as OSRM receives new commits but no one seems interested in representing the project. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [OSRM-talk] Is STXXL still used in the wild?
Hello! пн, 15 июн. 2020 г. в 15:47, Mateusz Loskot : > On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 13:27, Frédéric Rodrigo > wrote: > > > > > > Ask was already made to reaming people with access, to name new > > commiters and allow the community to take the project. > > Some commits are being made and PRs are being merged. > So, I'd suggest to keep submitting PRs and keep on nudging > maintainers, whoever is available out there. > > > So I made a PR [0] to remove STXXL, let's see if it will be merged or not. [0] https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5760 ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [OSRM-talk] Is STXXL still used in the wild?
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 13:27, Frédéric Rodrigo wrote: > > Le 15/06/2020 à 11:39, Mateusz Loskot a écrit : > > On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 11:46, Denis Chapligin wrote: > >> I was building libraries for a windows build and discovered that STXXL is > >> abandonware atm > > "OSRM is essentially abandonware at this point" too > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2020-March/001849.html > > > It is not totally true. There is still a community, but without access > to the github repository as commiter. > > Ask was already made to reaming people with access, to name new > commiters and allow the community to take the project. Some commits are being made and PRs are being merged. So, I'd suggest to keep submitting PRs and keep on nudging maintainers, whoever is available out there. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [OSRM-talk] Is STXXL still used in the wild?
Le 15/06/2020 à 11:39, Mateusz Loskot a écrit : On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 11:46, Denis Chapligin wrote: I was building libraries for a windows build and discovered that STXXL is abandonware atm "OSRM is essentially abandonware at this point" too https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2020-March/001849.html Best regards, It is not totally true. There is still a community, but without access to the github repository as commiter. Ask was already made to reaming people with access, to name new commiters and allow the community to take the project. Frédéric Rodrigo. ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [OSRM-talk] Is STXXL still used in the wild?
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 12:51, Denis Chapligin wrote: > пн, 15 июн. 2020 г. в 12:40, Mateusz Loskot : >> >> On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 11:46, Denis Chapligin wrote: >> > >> > I was building libraries for a windows build and discovered that STXXL is >> > abandonware atm >> >> "OSRM is essentially abandonware at this point" too >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2020-March/001849.html >> >> > > And I'm really concerned about that :( Me too. > Regarding STXXL presence - yep, i know it's optional, but it _may_ be an > issue for c++17 introduction ;) If I was about to do it, I would do this: 1. Submit PR wiping out all traces of STXXL 2. Submit PR bumping required C++ version to C++17 with minimal code modernisation to enable compilation as C++17 3. Continue with series of manageable PRs modernising code to C++17 I honestly expect such PRs will be accepted as I see no practical reasons to not to. I should be able to offer my help in reviewing and testing the PRs, as well as submitting some for the 3. part. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [OSRM-talk] Is STXXL still used in the wild?
Hello! пн, 15 июн. 2020 г. в 12:40, Mateusz Loskot : > On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 11:46, Denis Chapligin wrote: > > > > I was building libraries for a windows build and discovered that STXXL > is abandonware atm > > "OSRM is essentially abandonware at this point" too > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2020-March/001849.html > > > And I'm really concerned about that :( Regarding STXXL presence - yep, i know it's optional, but it _may_ be an issue for c++17 introduction ;) ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [OSRM-talk] Is STXXL still used in the wild?
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 11:46, Denis Chapligin wrote: > > I was building libraries for a windows build and discovered that STXXL is > abandonware atm "OSRM is essentially abandonware at this point" too https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2020-March/001849.html Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [OSRM-talk] Is STXXL still used in the wild?
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 11:46, Denis Chapligin wrote: > > i would like to ask, are there any actual users of STXXL left Although it won't make for any useful statistics, I have never built OSRM w/ STXXL enabled. > and are the any objections of dropping STXXL support from the OSRM? FYI, STXXL is optional, so you can already build OSRM as if STXXL support was dropped. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
[OSRM-talk] Is STXXL still used in the wild?
Hello! I was building libraries for a windows build and discovered that STXXL is abandonware atm and it is hard to compile it using modern c++ compilers, as it relies on language features deprecated at c++11 (nine years ago!). As modern computers usually have plenty of RAM and disk space for a normal swap and, if needed, OSRM processing can be executed in a cloud for couple of euros, i would like to ask, are there any actual users of STXXL left and are the any objections of dropping STXXL support from the OSRM? ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
