Re: [ossec-list] Re: Active response arguments - clarification

2011-12-20 Thread dan (ddp)
It does sound like a bug to me.

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Kat  wrote:
> Something to ponder however -- I thought it was in there - instead
> there was an unmatched  on a line within the command
> definition - and no error was generated, that is how I missed it.
>
> A bug perhaps?
>
> On Dec 20, 10:21 am, Kat  wrote:
>> A! ... um, No. :-(
>>
>> On Dec 20, 10:14 am, "dan (ddp)"  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Is srcip set in the command definition?


[ossec-list] Re: Active response arguments - clarification

2011-12-20 Thread Kat
Something to ponder however -- I thought it was in there - instead
there was an unmatched  on a line within the command
definition - and no error was generated, that is how I missed it.

A bug perhaps?

On Dec 20, 10:21 am, Kat  wrote:
> A! ... um, No. :-(
>
> On Dec 20, 10:14 am, "dan (ddp)"  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Is srcip set in the command definition?


[ossec-list] Re: Active response arguments - clarification

2011-12-20 Thread Kat
A! ... um, No. :-(

On Dec 20, 10:14 am, "dan (ddp)"  wrote:
> Is srcip set in the command definition?