Re: [otlkcon-devel] development environment - RE: Status?

2009-07-22 Thread g...@novadsp.com

K, seen these? http://www.codeplex.com/OutlookMAPISamples

Kervin Pierre wrote:


You won't need Exchange, so that should help simplify the 
environment.  You won't need to inspect packets either.  You will need 
to inspect assembly.  Are you familiar with MAPI internals at all?  Or 
IDA Pro and Assembly Language?


 

I really only ever used a CalDAV server for testing.  We can use 
Bedework ( http://bedework.com/ ) for this.


 

If you plan on working on migrating the datalayer to C#, then you 
won't need a server at all.  All the testing can be done locally.


 

If you plan to work on shared folders support then you will need IDA 
Pro and lots, and lots of patience J


 

Unfortunately, there isn't much documentation.  But I will be happy to 
answer any questions you may have.


 

 The role of the datalayer is to save MAPI data.  This is what saves 
appointments and messages to the disk.  It is only used by a very 
small number of interfaces.  Actually IMAPIProp 
(http://otlkcon.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/otlkcon/trunk/otlkcon/opncon/O_IProp.cpp?view=markup 
) and IMAPITable being the biggest consumers.  Currently, it uses an 
SQLite database.  We should move this to SQL Server Compact for better 
locking, application transaction model and more support for platform 
database abstraction features.


 

Again, feel free to ask as many questions as you'd like.  I will try 
to clarify things as best as I can.


 


Best regards,

Kervin


--
___
otlkcon-devel mailing list
otlkcon-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/otlkcon-devel


Re: [otlkcon-devel] development environment - RE: Status?

2009-07-22 Thread g...@novadsp.com

Hello all,

Further searching around the Unix/MAPI theme shows Evolution has covered 
a lot of ground.


See here for their project status: http://www.go-evolution.org/MAPIProvider

This matrix is interesting too: 
http://www.go-evolution.org/MAPIProvider/vsOWA


Jerry.


Kervin Pierre wrote:


This is very interesting.  I hadn't noticed that.

 

These providers have been around in one form or the other for  at 
least 10 years now, first distributed with the MAPI Provider book.


 

We could never use them though because there was no explicit license 
attached to the source.


 

But with their inclusion on  Codeplex and explicit license we can now 
probably utilize those.  I'll look into this further.


 


Best regards,

Kervin

 

 


*From:* g...@novadsp.com [mailto:g...@novadsp.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 22, 2009 2:32 PM
*To:* Kervin Pierre
*Cc:* otlkcon-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* Re: development environment - RE: [otlkcon-devel] Status?

 


K, seen these? http://www.codeplex.com/OutlookMAPISamples

Kervin Pierre wrote:

You won't need Exchange, so that should help simplify the 
environment.  You won't need to inspect packets either.  You will need 
to inspect assembly.  Are you familiar with MAPI internals at all?  Or 
IDA Pro and Assembly Language?


 

I really only ever used a CalDAV server for testing.  We can use 
Bedework ( http://bedework.com/ ) for this.


 

If you plan on working on migrating the datalayer to C#, then you 
won't need a server at all.  All the testing can be done locally.


 

If you plan to work on shared folders support then you will need IDA 
Pro and lots, and lots of patience J


 

Unfortunately, there isn't much documentation.  But I will be happy to 
answer any questions you may have.


 

 The role of the datalayer is to save MAPI data.  This is what saves 
appointments and messages to the disk.  It is only used by a very 
small number of interfaces.  Actually IMAPIProp 
(http://otlkcon.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/otlkcon/trunk/otlkcon/opncon/O_IProp.cpp?view=markup 
) and IMAPITable being the biggest consumers.  Currently, it uses an 
SQLite database.  We should move this to SQL Server Compact for better 
locking, application transaction model and more support for platform 
database abstraction features.


 

Again, feel free to ask as many questions as you'd like.  I will try 
to clarify things as best as I can.


 


Best regards,

Kervin

 

--
___
otlkcon-devel mailing list
otlkcon-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/otlkcon-devel


Re: [otlkcon-devel] Status?

2009-07-21 Thread g...@novadsp.com

Hello Kervin

I can actively participate in development - I'm trying to establish what 
OC needs to get built. Which Exchange SDK are you using for the current 
release? Although the calendar aspect is good I'm most keen to get 
shared tasks up  running.


Sadly cannot help with funding - indeed could use some myself :)

When I get Zimbra configured I will get a chance to test their connector 
- right now it's an MX mess :\


Any info gratefully received

G.

Kervin Pierre wrote:


Hello,

 

I am unable to put in anytime into the project at this time, and no 
one has stepped in to continue or fund development.  So I would have 
to say the project is stalled until this situation changes.


 

Open Connector is primarily a CalDAV connector.  So I think your best 
bet would be to go with one of the commercial offerings out there like 
Zimbra Connector or ZideOne.


 


Best regards,

Kervin

 

 


*From:* g...@novadsp.com [mailto:g...@novadsp.com]
*Sent:* Monday, July 20, 2009 10:03 AM
*To:* otlkcon-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* [otlkcon-devel] Status?

 


I'm trying to establish the status of this project -

Can anyone tell me which parts of the Exchange SDK are required to 
build the connector DLL?
Has anyone had good results using the connector with Linux servers 
like Zimbra or Citadel?


Thx++

G.

--
___
otlkcon-devel mailing list
otlkcon-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/otlkcon-devel


[otlkcon-devel] Status?

2009-07-20 Thread g...@novadsp.com

I'm trying to establish the status of this project -

Can anyone tell me which parts of the Exchange SDK are required to build 
the connector DLL?
Has anyone had good results using the connector with Linux servers like 
Zimbra or Citadel?


Thx++

G.


--
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, 
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge___
otlkcon-devel mailing list
otlkcon-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/otlkcon-devel