Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next v2 4/9] net: psample: allow using rate as probability

2024-06-17 Thread Simon Horman
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 06:32:14AM +, Adrián Moreno wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 05:11:30PM GMT, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 08:56:38PM +0200, Adrian Moreno wrote:
> > > Although not explicitly documented in the psample module itself, the
> > > definition of PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_RATE seems inherited from act_sample.
> > >
> > > Quoting tc-sample(8):
> > > "RATE of 100 will lead to an average of one sampled packet out of every
> > > 100 observed."
> > >
> > > With this semantics, the rates that we can express with an unsigned
> > > 32-bits number are very unevenly distributed and concentrated towards
> > > "sampling few packets".
> > > For example, we can express a probability of 2.32E-8% but we
> > > cannot express anything between 100% and 50%.
> > >
> > > For sampling applications that are capable of sampling a decent
> > > amount of packets, this sampling rate semantics is not very useful.
> > >
> > > Add a new flag to the uAPI that indicates that the sampling rate is
> > > expressed in scaled probability, this is:
> > > - 0 is 0% probability, no packets get sampled.
> > > - U32_MAX is 100% probability, all packets get sampled.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno 
> >
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > Would it be possible to add appropriate documentation for
> > rate - both the original ratio variant, and the new probability
> > variant - somewhere?
> >
> 
> Hi Simon, thanks for the suggestion. Would the uapi header be a good
> place for such documentation?

Hi Adrian,

I didn't look closely, but that does sound like a good place to me.
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev


Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next v2 4/9] net: psample: allow using rate as probability

2024-06-17 Thread Adrián Moreno
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 05:11:30PM GMT, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 08:56:38PM +0200, Adrian Moreno wrote:
> > Although not explicitly documented in the psample module itself, the
> > definition of PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_RATE seems inherited from act_sample.
> >
> > Quoting tc-sample(8):
> > "RATE of 100 will lead to an average of one sampled packet out of every
> > 100 observed."
> >
> > With this semantics, the rates that we can express with an unsigned
> > 32-bits number are very unevenly distributed and concentrated towards
> > "sampling few packets".
> > For example, we can express a probability of 2.32E-8% but we
> > cannot express anything between 100% and 50%.
> >
> > For sampling applications that are capable of sampling a decent
> > amount of packets, this sampling rate semantics is not very useful.
> >
> > Add a new flag to the uAPI that indicates that the sampling rate is
> > expressed in scaled probability, this is:
> > - 0 is 0% probability, no packets get sampled.
> > - U32_MAX is 100% probability, all packets get sampled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno 
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Would it be possible to add appropriate documentation for
> rate - both the original ratio variant, and the new probability
> variant - somewhere?
>

Hi Simon, thanks for the suggestion. Would the uapi header be a good
place for such documentation?

> That aside, this looks good to me.
>
> ...
>

___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev


Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next v2 4/9] net: psample: allow using rate as probability

2024-06-14 Thread Simon Horman
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 08:56:38PM +0200, Adrian Moreno wrote:
> Although not explicitly documented in the psample module itself, the
> definition of PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_RATE seems inherited from act_sample.
> 
> Quoting tc-sample(8):
> "RATE of 100 will lead to an average of one sampled packet out of every
> 100 observed."
> 
> With this semantics, the rates that we can express with an unsigned
> 32-bits number are very unevenly distributed and concentrated towards
> "sampling few packets".
> For example, we can express a probability of 2.32E-8% but we
> cannot express anything between 100% and 50%.
> 
> For sampling applications that are capable of sampling a decent
> amount of packets, this sampling rate semantics is not very useful.
> 
> Add a new flag to the uAPI that indicates that the sampling rate is
> expressed in scaled probability, this is:
> - 0 is 0% probability, no packets get sampled.
> - U32_MAX is 100% probability, all packets get sampled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno 

Hi Adrian,

Would it be possible to add appropriate documentation for
rate - both the original ratio variant, and the new probability
variant - somewhere?

That aside, this looks good to me.

...
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev


[ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next v2 4/9] net: psample: allow using rate as probability

2024-06-03 Thread Adrian Moreno
Although not explicitly documented in the psample module itself, the
definition of PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_RATE seems inherited from act_sample.

Quoting tc-sample(8):
"RATE of 100 will lead to an average of one sampled packet out of every
100 observed."

With this semantics, the rates that we can express with an unsigned
32-bits number are very unevenly distributed and concentrated towards
"sampling few packets".
For example, we can express a probability of 2.32E-8% but we
cannot express anything between 100% and 50%.

For sampling applications that are capable of sampling a decent
amount of packets, this sampling rate semantics is not very useful.

Add a new flag to the uAPI that indicates that the sampling rate is
expressed in scaled probability, this is:
- 0 is 0% probability, no packets get sampled.
- U32_MAX is 100% probability, all packets get sampled.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno 
---
 include/net/psample.h | 3 ++-
 include/uapi/linux/psample.h  | 4 
 include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_sample.h | 1 +
 net/psample/psample.c | 3 +++
 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/net/psample.h b/include/net/psample.h
index 2ac71260a546..c52e9ebd88dd 100644
--- a/include/net/psample.h
+++ b/include/net/psample.h
@@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ struct psample_metadata {
u8 out_tc_valid:1,
   out_tc_occ_valid:1,
   latency_valid:1,
-  unused:5;
+  rate_as_probability:1,
+  unused:4;
const u8 *user_cookie;
u32 user_cookie_len;
 };
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/psample.h b/include/uapi/linux/psample.h
index e80637e1d97b..8b069e75beab 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/psample.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/psample.h
@@ -20,6 +20,10 @@ enum {
PSAMPLE_ATTR_TIMESTAMP, /* u64, nanoseconds */
PSAMPLE_ATTR_PROTO, /* u16 */
PSAMPLE_ATTR_USER_COOKIE,   /* binary, user provided data */
+   PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_PROBABILITY,/* no argument, interpret rate in
+* PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_RATE as a
+* probability scaled 0 - U32_MAX.
+*/
 
__PSAMPLE_ATTR_MAX
 };
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_sample.h 
b/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_sample.h
index fee1bcc20793..7ee0735e7b38 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_sample.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_sample.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ enum {
TCA_SAMPLE_TRUNC_SIZE,
TCA_SAMPLE_PSAMPLE_GROUP,
TCA_SAMPLE_PAD,
+   TCA_SAMPLE_PROBABILITY,
__TCA_SAMPLE_MAX
 };
 #define TCA_SAMPLE_MAX (__TCA_SAMPLE_MAX - 1)
diff --git a/net/psample/psample.c b/net/psample/psample.c
index 1c76f3e48dcd..f48b5b9cd409 100644
--- a/net/psample/psample.c
+++ b/net/psample/psample.c
@@ -497,6 +497,9 @@ void psample_sample_packet(struct psample_group *group, 
struct sk_buff *skb,
md->user_cookie))
goto error;
 
+   if (md->rate_as_probability)
+   nla_put_flag(skb, PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_PROBABILITY);
+
genlmsg_end(nl_skb, data);
genlmsg_multicast_netns(_nl_family, group->net, nl_skb, 0,
PSAMPLE_NL_MCGRP_SAMPLE, GFP_ATOMIC);
-- 
2.45.1

___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev