Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] rstp: add ability to receive VLAN-tagged BPDUs
On 23/02/2019 00:12, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:16:14AM +0100, Matthias May via dev wrote: >> There are switches which allow to transmit their BPDUs VLAN-tagged. >> With this change OVS is able to receive VLAN-tagged BPDUs, but still >> transmits its own BPDUs untagged. >> This was tested against Westermo RFI-207-F4G-T3G. >> >> v2: Send patch to different address of mailing list according to suggestion >> of Flavio Leitner. >> >> Signed-off-by: Matthias May > > I applied this to master. Thanks! > > I fussed with it a bit to make it closer to the preferred style. Here > is what I committed: > > --8<--cut here-->8-- > > From: Matthias May > Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:16:14 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] rstp: add ability to receive VLAN-tagged BPDUs > > There are switches which allow to transmit their BPDUs VLAN-tagged. > With this change OVS is able to receive VLAN-tagged BPDUs, but still > transmits its own BPDUs untagged. > This was tested against Westermo RFI-207-F4G-T3G. > > Signed-off-by: Matthias May > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff > --- > ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c | 6 +- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c > index acd4817c2549..81b72be37eb5 100644 > --- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c > +++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c > @@ -1787,7 +1787,11 @@ rstp_process_packet(const struct xport *xport, const > struct dp_packet *packet) > dp_packet_set_size(, ntohs(eth->eth_type) + ETH_HEADER_LEN); > } > > -if (dp_packet_try_pull(, ETH_HEADER_LEN + LLC_HEADER_LEN)) { > +int len = ETH_HEADER_LEN + LLC_HEADER_LEN; > +if (eth->eth_type == htons(ETH_TYPE_VLAN)) { > +len += VLAN_HEADER_LEN; > +} > +if (dp_packet_try_pull(, len)) { > rstp_port_received_bpdu(xport->rstp_port, dp_packet_data(), > dp_packet_size()); > } > OK. Thank you. BR Matthias ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] rstp: add ability to receive VLAN-tagged BPDUs
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:16:14AM +0100, Matthias May via dev wrote: > There are switches which allow to transmit their BPDUs VLAN-tagged. > With this change OVS is able to receive VLAN-tagged BPDUs, but still > transmits its own BPDUs untagged. > This was tested against Westermo RFI-207-F4G-T3G. > > v2: Send patch to different address of mailing list according to suggestion > of Flavio Leitner. > > Signed-off-by: Matthias May I applied this to master. Thanks! I fussed with it a bit to make it closer to the preferred style. Here is what I committed: --8<--cut here-->8-- From: Matthias May Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:16:14 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] rstp: add ability to receive VLAN-tagged BPDUs There are switches which allow to transmit their BPDUs VLAN-tagged. With this change OVS is able to receive VLAN-tagged BPDUs, but still transmits its own BPDUs untagged. This was tested against Westermo RFI-207-F4G-T3G. Signed-off-by: Matthias May Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff --- ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c | 6 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c index acd4817c2549..81b72be37eb5 100644 --- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c +++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c @@ -1787,7 +1787,11 @@ rstp_process_packet(const struct xport *xport, const struct dp_packet *packet) dp_packet_set_size(, ntohs(eth->eth_type) + ETH_HEADER_LEN); } -if (dp_packet_try_pull(, ETH_HEADER_LEN + LLC_HEADER_LEN)) { +int len = ETH_HEADER_LEN + LLC_HEADER_LEN; +if (eth->eth_type == htons(ETH_TYPE_VLAN)) { +len += VLAN_HEADER_LEN; +} +if (dp_packet_try_pull(, len)) { rstp_port_received_bpdu(xport->rstp_port, dp_packet_data(), dp_packet_size()); } -- 2.20.1 ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
[ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] rstp: add ability to receive VLAN-tagged BPDUs
There are switches which allow to transmit their BPDUs VLAN-tagged. With this change OVS is able to receive VLAN-tagged BPDUs, but still transmits its own BPDUs untagged. This was tested against Westermo RFI-207-F4G-T3G. v2: Send patch to different address of mailing list according to suggestion of Flavio Leitner. Signed-off-by: Matthias May --- ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c | 7 ++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c index acd4817c2..7830fee2e 100644 --- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c +++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c @@ -1771,9 +1771,12 @@ xport_rstp_should_manage_bpdu(const struct xport *xport) return rstp_should_manage_bpdu(xport_get_rstp_port_state(xport)); } +#define LEN_WITHOUT_VLAN (ETH_HEADER_LEN + LLC_HEADER_LEN) +#define LEN_WITH_VLAN (VLAN_HEADER_LEN + LEN_WITHOUT_VLAN) static void rstp_process_packet(const struct xport *xport, const struct dp_packet *packet) { +int len; struct dp_packet payload = *packet; struct eth_header *eth = dp_packet_data(); @@ -1787,7 +1790,9 @@ rstp_process_packet(const struct xport *xport, const struct dp_packet *packet) dp_packet_set_size(, ntohs(eth->eth_type) + ETH_HEADER_LEN); } -if (dp_packet_try_pull(, ETH_HEADER_LEN + LLC_HEADER_LEN)) { +/* Pull a bit less payload when the BPDU is enveloped in a VLAN header */ +len = (ntohs(eth->eth_type) == 0x8100) ? LEN_WITH_VLAN : LEN_WITHOUT_VLAN; +if (dp_packet_try_pull(, len)) { rstp_port_received_bpdu(xport->rstp_port, dp_packet_data(), dp_packet_size()); } -- 2.20.1 ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev