Re: [ovs-dev] In ovs-2.4 version, why can't stop dpdk-bond port by `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN`?

[Ben Pfaff]

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 06:07:35PM +0800, Sam wrote:
> I'm working in ovs 2.4 version, and I use "dpdkb" type netdev. Then I
> call  `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN` to down this device, at last, my
> code call "rte_eth_dev_stop(dev->port_id);".
> 
> But counter shows the port is still rx/tx, why?

OVS 2.4 is pretty old and no longer supported.  You should probably try
a newer version.
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Re: [ovs-dev] In ovs-2.4 version, why can't stop dpdk-bond port by `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN`?

[Sam]

The "dev->port_id" is bond port id, should I use slave port id instead ?

2017-11-27 18:07 GMT+08:00 Sam :

> Hi all,
>
> I'm working in ovs 2.4 version, and I use "dpdkb" type netdev. Then I
> call  `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN` to down this device, at last, my
> code call "rte_eth_dev_stop(dev->port_id);".
>
> But counter shows the port is still rx/tx, why?
>
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

[ovs-dev] In ovs-2.4 version, why can't stop dpdk-bond port by `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN`?

[Sam]

Hi all,

I'm working in ovs 2.4 version, and I use "dpdkb" type netdev. Then I
call  `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN` to down this device, at last, my
code call "rte_eth_dev_stop(dev->port_id);".

But counter shows the port is still rx/tx, why?
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev