Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] checkpatch: Normalize exit code for Windows

2019-02-11 Thread aserdean
> De la: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org  boun...@openvswitch.org> În numele Aaron Conole
> Trimis: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 10:39 PM
> Către: Alin Gabriel Serdean 
> Cc: d...@openvswitch.org
> Subiect: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] checkpatch: Normalize exit code for Windows
> 
> Alin Gabriel Serdean  writes:
> 
> > Using python `sys.exit(-1)` on Windows produces mixed results.
> > Let's take the following results from different shells:
> > CMD
> >>python -c "import sys; sys.exit(-1)" & echo %errorlevel%
> > 1
> > MSYS
> > $ python -c "import sys; sys.exit(-1)" && echo $?
> > 0
> > WSL
> > $ python -c "import sys; sys.exit(-1)"; echo $?
> > 255
> >
> > this results in the following tests to fail:
> > checkpatch
> >
> >  10: checkpatch - sign-offs  FAILED
(checkpatch.at:32)
> >  11: checkpatch - parenthesized constructs   FAILED
(checkpatch.at:32)
> >  12: checkpatch - parenthesized constructs - for FAILED
> (checkpatch.at:32)
> >  13: checkpatch - comments   FAILED
(checkpatch.at:32)
> >
> > because of:
> >  ./checkpatch.at:32: exit code was 0, expected 255
> >
> > This patch introduces a positive constant for the default exit code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alin Gabriel Serdean 
> > ---
> 
> Acked-by: Aaron Conole 
> 
> With one little fixup:
> 
> 1. either we should eliminate the result argument to
>ovs_checkpatch_print_result
> 
> 2. or the test for the result < 0 needs to change to if result:
> 
> Otherwise, when an error is introduced, the exit code will be propagated,
> but the printout will be confusing:
> 
>   03:30:50 aconole {(0a8c1ec04...)} ~/git/ovs$ git commit -m "dpdk: This
is a
> test
>   Just testing
>   "
>   ERROR: C99 style comment
>   #10 FILE: lib/dpdk.c:17:
>   // BREAK!!
> 
> Lines checked: 15, no obvious problems found
> 
> :-)
> 
[Alin Serdean] Thanks for the feedback. I sent an incremental:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1039912/ . Do you mind taking another
look?

___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev


Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] checkpatch: Normalize exit code for Windows

2019-02-05 Thread Aaron Conole
Alin Gabriel Serdean  writes:

> Using python `sys.exit(-1)` on Windows produces mixed results.
> Let's take the following results from different shells:
> CMD
>>python -c "import sys; sys.exit(-1)" & echo %errorlevel%
> 1
> MSYS
> $ python -c "import sys; sys.exit(-1)" && echo $?
> 0
> WSL
> $ python -c "import sys; sys.exit(-1)"; echo $?
> 255
>
> this results in the following tests to fail:
> checkpatch
>
>  10: checkpatch - sign-offs  FAILED (checkpatch.at:32)
>  11: checkpatch - parenthesized constructs   FAILED (checkpatch.at:32)
>  12: checkpatch - parenthesized constructs - for FAILED (checkpatch.at:32)
>  13: checkpatch - comments   FAILED (checkpatch.at:32)
>
> because of:
>  ./checkpatch.at:32: exit code was 0, expected 255
>
> This patch introduces a positive constant for the default exit code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alin Gabriel Serdean 
> ---

Acked-by: Aaron Conole 

With one little fixup:

1. either we should eliminate the result argument to
   ovs_checkpatch_print_result

2. or the test for the result < 0 needs to change to if result:

Otherwise, when an error is introduced, the exit code will be
propagated, but the printout will be confusing:

  03:30:50 aconole {(0a8c1ec04...)} ~/git/ovs$ git commit -m "dpdk: This is a 
test
  Just testing
  "
  ERROR: C99 style comment
  #10 FILE: lib/dpdk.c:17:
  // BREAK!!

Lines checked: 15, no obvious problems found

:-)

>  utilities/checkpatch.py | 13 +++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/utilities/checkpatch.py b/utilities/checkpatch.py
> index 8eab31f60..8b305f2ad 100755
> --- a/utilities/checkpatch.py
> +++ b/utilities/checkpatch.py
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ import sys
>  RETURN_CHECK_INITIAL_STATE = 0
>  RETURN_CHECK_STATE_WITH_RETURN = 1
>  RETURN_CHECK_AWAITING_BRACE = 2
> +EXIT_CODE = 255
>  __errors = 0
>  __warnings = 0
>  empty_return_check_state = 0
> @@ -837,7 +838,7 @@ def ovs_checkpatch_parse(text, filename, author=None, 
> committer=None):
>  
>  run_file_checks(text)
>  if __errors or __warnings:
> -return -1
> +return EXIT_CODE
>  return 0
>  
>  
> @@ -920,7 +921,7 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
> "quiet"])
>  except:
>  print("Unknown option encountered. Please rerun with -h for help.")
> -sys.exit(-1)
> +sys.exit(EXIT_CODE)
>  
>  for o, a in optlist:
>  if o in ("-h", "--help"):
> @@ -946,7 +947,7 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
>  quiet = True
>  else:
>  print("Unknown option '%s'" % o)
> -sys.exit(-1)
> +sys.exit(EXIT_CODE)
>  
>  if sys.stdout.isatty():
>  colors = True
> @@ -974,13 +975,13 @@ Subject: %s
>  result = ovs_checkpatch_parse(patch, revision)
>  ovs_checkpatch_print_result(result)
>  if result:
> -status = -1
> +status = EXIT_CODE
>  sys.exit(status)
>  
>  if not args:
>  if sys.stdin.isatty():
>  usage()
> -sys.exit(-1)
> +sys.exit(EXIT_CODE)
>  result = ovs_checkpatch_parse(sys.stdin.read(), '-')
>  ovs_checkpatch_print_result(result)
>  sys.exit(result)
> @@ -991,5 +992,5 @@ Subject: %s
>  print('== Checking "%s" ==' % filename)
>  result = ovs_checkpatch_file(filename)
>  if result:
> -status = -1
> +status = EXIT_CODE
>  sys.exit(status)
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev


Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] checkpatch: Normalize exit code for Windows

2019-02-05 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 05:05:19PM +0200, Alin Gabriel Serdean wrote:
> Using python `sys.exit(-1)` on Windows produces mixed results.
> Let's take the following results from different shells:
> CMD
> >python -c "import sys; sys.exit(-1)" & echo %errorlevel%
> 1
> MSYS
> $ python -c "import sys; sys.exit(-1)" && echo $?
> 0
> WSL
> $ python -c "import sys; sys.exit(-1)"; echo $?
> 255
> 
> this results in the following tests to fail:
> checkpatch
> 
>  10: checkpatch - sign-offs  FAILED (checkpatch.at:32)
>  11: checkpatch - parenthesized constructs   FAILED (checkpatch.at:32)
>  12: checkpatch - parenthesized constructs - for FAILED (checkpatch.at:32)
>  13: checkpatch - comments   FAILED (checkpatch.at:32)
> 
> because of:
>  ./checkpatch.at:32: exit code was 0, expected 255
> 
> This patch introduces a positive constant for the default exit code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alin Gabriel Serdean 

Curious!  I did not know about this particular nonportable behavior.

Acked-by: Ben Pfaff 
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev