Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:05:05PM +, majop...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Miguel Angel Ajo > > This patch handles multiple gateways with priorities in chassisredirect > ports, any gateway with a chassis redirect port will implement the > rules to de-encapsulate incomming packets for such port. > > And hosts targetting a remote chassisredirect port will setup a > bundle(active_backup, ..) action to each tunnel port, in the given > priority order. > > Signed-off-by: Miguel Angel Ajo I feel unqualified to fully and properly review this series. Guru, is it something you'd feel able to take a look at? Is anyone else planning to review this? Thanks, Ben. ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways
Thank you Ben and Guru, I plan to generalise this work with follow up patches, to let us setup a multiple chassis on a Logical_Router too (and hence handle it via the l3gateway ports). Anil Venkata is also working on a follow up patch to make sure gARPs are only announced on the master/active gateway. On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:05:05PM +, majop...@redhat.com wrote: > > From: Miguel Angel Ajo > > > > This patch handles multiple gateways with priorities in chassisredirect > > ports, any gateway with a chassis redirect port will implement the > > rules to de-encapsulate incomming packets for such port. > > > > And hosts targetting a remote chassisredirect port will setup a > > bundle(active_backup, ..) action to each tunnel port, in the given > > priority order. > > > > Signed-off-by: Miguel Angel Ajo > > I feel unqualified to fully and properly review this series. Guru, is > it something you'd feel able to take a look at? Is anyone else planning > to review this? > > Thanks, > > Ben. > ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways
I'd like this feature to be considered for OVS 2.8, I know the deadline for branching is close, but this would let us implement l3ha on the networking-ovn side, closing one of the gaps we have with the reference implementation now. Best regards, Miguel Ángel On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo < majop...@redhat.com> wrote: > Thank you Ben and Guru, > > I plan to generalise this work with follow up patches, to let us > setup a multiple chassis on a Logical_Router too (and hence handle it > via the l3gateway ports). > >Anil Venkata is also working on a follow up patch to make sure > gARPs are only announced on the master/active gateway. > > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:05:05PM +, majop...@redhat.com wrote: >> > From: Miguel Angel Ajo >> > >> > This patch handles multiple gateways with priorities in chassisredirect >> > ports, any gateway with a chassis redirect port will implement the >> > rules to de-encapsulate incomming packets for such port. >> > >> > And hosts targetting a remote chassisredirect port will setup a >> > bundle(active_backup, ..) action to each tunnel port, in the given >> > priority order. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Miguel Angel Ajo >> >> I feel unqualified to fully and properly review this series. Guru, is >> it something you'd feel able to take a look at? Is anyone else planning >> to review this? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ben. >> > > ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways
On 8 June 2017 at 14:39, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:05:05PM +, majop...@redhat.com wrote: > > From: Miguel Angel Ajo > > > > This patch handles multiple gateways with priorities in chassisredirect > > ports, any gateway with a chassis redirect port will implement the > > rules to de-encapsulate incomming packets for such port. > > > > And hosts targetting a remote chassisredirect port will setup a > > bundle(active_backup, ..) action to each tunnel port, in the given > > priority order. > > > > Signed-off-by: Miguel Angel Ajo > > I feel unqualified to fully and properly review this series. Guru, is > it something you'd feel able to take a look at? Is anyone else planning > to review this? > I will have a go at it. > > Thanks, > > Ben. > ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Guru Shetty wrote: > On 8 June 2017 at 14:39, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:05:05PM +, majop...@redhat.com wrote: >> > From: Miguel Angel Ajo >> > >> > This patch handles multiple gateways with priorities in chassisredirect >> > ports, any gateway with a chassis redirect port will implement the >> > rules to de-encapsulate incomming packets for such port. >> > >> > And hosts targetting a remote chassisredirect port will setup a >> > bundle(active_backup, ..) action to each tunnel port, in the given >> > priority order. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Miguel Angel Ajo >> >> I feel unqualified to fully and properly review this series. Guru, is >> it something you'd feel able to take a look at? Is anyone else planning >> to review this? >> > > I will have a go at it. Thanks a lot, Guru. Since this is important for OpenStack, let me know if you won't have time to review and I'll make time to help. I think you're a better reviewer for this one, though. -- Russell Bryant ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways
On 13 June 2017 at 10:17, Russell Bryant wrote: > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Guru Shetty wrote: > > On 8 June 2017 at 14:39, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:05:05PM +, majop...@redhat.com wrote: > >> > From: Miguel Angel Ajo > >> > > >> > This patch handles multiple gateways with priorities in > chassisredirect > >> > ports, any gateway with a chassis redirect port will implement the > >> > rules to de-encapsulate incomming packets for such port. > >> > > >> > And hosts targetting a remote chassisredirect port will setup a > >> > bundle(active_backup, ..) action to each tunnel port, in the given > >> > priority order. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Miguel Angel Ajo > >> > >> I feel unqualified to fully and properly review this series. Guru, is > >> it something you'd feel able to take a look at? Is anyone else planning > >> to review this? > >> > > > > I will have a go at it. > > Thanks a lot, Guru. Since this is important for OpenStack, let me > know if you won't have time to review and I'll make time to help. I > think you're a better reviewer for this one, though. > Russell, If you want to do the initial round, please go ahead. Since you know more about the usecase and how it is to be used by OpenStack, your review will help. > > -- > Russell Bryant > ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Guru Shetty wrote: > > > On 13 June 2017 at 10:17, Russell Bryant wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Guru Shetty wrote: >> > On 8 June 2017 at 14:39, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> > >> >> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:05:05PM +, majop...@redhat.com wrote: >> >> > From: Miguel Angel Ajo >> >> > >> >> > This patch handles multiple gateways with priorities in >> >> > chassisredirect >> >> > ports, any gateway with a chassis redirect port will implement the >> >> > rules to de-encapsulate incomming packets for such port. >> >> > >> >> > And hosts targetting a remote chassisredirect port will setup a >> >> > bundle(active_backup, ..) action to each tunnel port, in the given >> >> > priority order. >> >> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Miguel Angel Ajo >> >> >> >> I feel unqualified to fully and properly review this series. Guru, is >> >> it something you'd feel able to take a look at? Is anyone else >> >> planning >> >> to review this? >> >> >> > >> > I will have a go at it. >> >> Thanks a lot, Guru. Since this is important for OpenStack, let me >> know if you won't have time to review and I'll make time to help. I >> think you're a better reviewer for this one, though. > > Russell, > If you want to do the initial round, please go ahead. Since you know more > about the usecase and how it is to be used by OpenStack, your review will > help. OK - I'll do a pass on them. -- Russell Bryant ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
