Patches 1 and 3 are also reviewed by Darrell now.
So, maybe we can apply them before we finish our holy war about patch #2 ?
We can easily apply #3 without #2 because they have nothing in common.
Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
On 05.07.2017 17:30, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> Hi all.
> IMHO, these patches was reviewed and tested enough to be merged.
> Does anybody have objections?
> Ben, Darrell, what do you think?
>
> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
>
> On 15.06.2017 14:36, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> Version 3:
>> * Added comment about 'static_txq_id's adjustment.
>> * Added additional parentheses around 'dynamic_txqs'
>>comparison operand because of warning from GCC 6.3.1.
>>
>> Version 2:
>> * Dropped patch [1/4] as already applied to master.
>> * Fixed checkpatch warning in patch [2/4].
>> * 'reconfigure_pmd_threads' modified for better maintainability
>>as suggested by Daniele Di Proietto in patch [2/4]:
>>1. delete old pmd threads
>>2. reconfigure if 'static_tx_qid's adjustment needed
>>3. add new pmd threads
>> * Fixed locking of HW tx queues in case of big amount of
>>available cores in patch [3/4].
>> * Dropped RFC tag for patch [4/4].
>>
>> Ilya Maximets (3):
>> dpif-netdev: Incremental addition/deletion of PMD threads.
>> dpif-netdev: Avoid port's reconfiguration on pmd-cpu-mask changes.
>> dpif-netdev: Don't uninit emc on reload.
>>
>> lib/dpif-netdev.c | 176
>> --
>> tests/pmd.at | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
