Re: [ovs-discuss] What is the best way to set a Geneve tunnel based on dpdk device

[Hui Xiang]

Thank you very much Sara!

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Sara Gittlin 
wrote:

> take a look at vxlan setup - it is similar
> http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/userspace-tunneling/
> --Sara
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Hui Xiang  wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> >   I have added a dpdk device in ovs bridge 'br-dpdk' in the compute host,
> > and expect the Geneve tunnel can send packets throught this bridge, my
> > question is what is the best way to make it work and do not affect dpdk
> > performance?
> >
> >   Is it enough to just assign an ip to interface br-dpdk? But in this
> way,
> > there is a flow 'normal' in the br-dpdk by default , if there are packets
> > need to be flood, the dpdk performance should be downgraded.  Thanks for
> any
> > advice.
> >
> >   Bridge br-dpdk
> > Port "dpdk0"
> > Interface "dpdk0"
> > type: dpdk
> > options: {dpdk-devargs=":0b:00.0", n_rxq="2"}
> >
> >
> > Hui.
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > discuss mailing list
> > disc...@openvswitch.org
> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
> >
>
___
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss

[ovs-discuss] What is the best way to set a Geneve tunnel based on dpdk device

[Hui Xiang]

Hi folks,

  I have added a dpdk device in ovs bridge 'br-dpdk' in the compute host,
and expect the Geneve tunnel can send packets throught this bridge, my
question is what is the best way to make it work and do not affect dpdk
performance?

  Is it enough to just assign an ip to interface br-dpdk? But in this way,
there is a flow 'normal' in the br-dpdk by default , if there are packets
need to be flood, the dpdk performance should be downgraded.  Thanks for
any advice.

  Bridge br-dpdk
Port "dpdk0"
Interface "dpdk0"
type: dpdk
options: {dpdk-devargs=":0b:00.0", n_rxq="2"}


Hui.
___
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss