[Owlim-discussion] Backup in running system
Hi, I want to ask how exactly backup is performed on running system. I read backup part in FAQ and everything seems fine, but I'm confused with word 'seamlessly'. Therefore using programatical approach : 1. Is backup consistency-safe on running system? Does it differ using OWLIM-SE or OWLIM-EE? My best guess is whether in OWLIM-EE is backup performed on one working node in following scenario : a. One working node is chosen and it stops to be up-to-date/replicated with other working nodes b. Full backup is made on this working node c. Working node is added back to work/replication and is updated with other nodes 2. Doesn't performing backup on running system degrade performance on such level it is unusable by high number of users? 3. Is there any way of incremental backup? The used store has tens of GB and therefore backupfile size + time needed for backup will be enormous if consistent backup cannot be made on running system. Thank you for your support. Best regards, Marek ___ Owlim-discussion mailing list Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion
[Owlim-discussion] All different, owl-max reasoning?
Hi folks, I am using OWLIM-Lite and the owl-max ruleset. I have a relationship defined in my ontology where some Player playsFor some Team, and playsFor is a functional object property from Player to Team. In addition, I have a blank node of type owl:allDifferent, and all Teams and Players have of owl:distinctMembers properties with the aforementioned blank node as the subject. When I query the relationships for a specific player, I get playsFor arcs for *all* teams, not just one. If the data was entered incorrectly-- should an ontology inconsistency be raised? Or is there something else going on here? Dan ___ Owlim-discussion mailing list Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion
