date:20130214

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Can't get "Online Backup and Restore" to work in OWLIM Enterprise

2013-02-14 Thread Tomas Vileiniškis

Definitely, Barry, I'll retry with the new build.

Tomas

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Barry Norton wrote:

>
> Tomas, there was a problem on some Windows platforms with your build
> (hence my question) that was fixed in the 5777 release:
>
> http://owlim.ontotext.com/display/OWLIMv53/OWLIM-Enterprise+Release+Notes#OWLIM-EnterpriseReleaseNotes-Version5.3%28build5777%29
>
> Could I get you to upgrade and re-try?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Barry
>
>
>
> On 14/02/13 16:02, Tomas Vileiniškis wrote:
>
> Sorry, forgot to include these in the first email. I'm using
> owlim-enterprise-5.3.5689 and Win Server 2008 R2 Standart 64-bit.
>
> Tomas
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Barry Norton 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Tomas, which version/build of OWLIM-Enterprise are you using, and on
>> which platform (OS)?
>>
>> Barry
>>
>>
>>
>> On 14/02/13 15:46, Tomas Vileiniškis wrote:
>>
>>  Hi list/devs,
>>
>>
>>  I’ve tried everything, but the “online backup” mechanism doesn’t seem
>> to work for me. As per instructions outlined in documentation:
>>
>>
>>
>> MasterReplicationPort – set to 8091 (unused, open)
>>
>> MasterURL – set to
>> http://master_IP:8080/openrdf-sesame/repositories/master_1
>>
>> Directory used for the backup image - C:\Users\test\Desktop\backup
>>
>> A few seconds after invoking the backup operation, I get the standard
>> “Method successfully invoked” message, however nothing happens and no
>> backup image is created. Here are the logs:
>>
>>
>>
>> From the master node:
>>
>> [INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:26:31,581 [RMI TCP Connection(14)-master_IP]
>> Started taking Backup to C:\Users\test\Desktop\back
>>
>> [INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:27:01,643 [backup] timeout to connect elapsed.
>> aborting.
>>
>> [INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:27:01,987 [RMI TCP Connection(14)-master_IP] Master
>> (??) 
>> http://Worker_node_2_IP:8080/openrdf-sesame/repositories/worker_2successfully
>>  received backup data.
>>
>>
>>
>> From the worker node (that is used to get the image from):
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:37,253 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=1
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:38,753 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=2
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:40,253 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=3
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:41,769 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=4
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:43,269 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=5
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:44,769 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=6
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:46,269 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=7
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:47,784 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=8
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:49,300 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=9
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:50,800 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=10
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:52,331 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=11
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:53,831 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=12
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:55,331 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=13
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:56,862 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=14
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:58,362 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=15
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:59,862 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=16
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:01,362 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=17
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:02,862 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=18
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:04,362 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=19
>>
>> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:05,894 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
>> refused: connect, retries left=20
>>
>> [INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:27:05,894 [repositories/worker_2] aborting ...
>>
>>
>>
>> I tried to change the MasterReplicationPort, backup directory path, but
>> that didn’t help. Just to note, the normal replication between nodes works
>> fine.
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>>
>>  Regards,
>>
>> Tomas
>>
>>
>>  ___
>> Owlim-discussion mailing 
>> listOwlim-discussion@ontotext.comhttp://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Owlim-discussion mailing list
>> Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
>> http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion
>>
>>
>
>
___
Owlim-discussion mailing list
Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cg

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Can't get "Online Backup and Restore" to work in OWLIM Enterprise

2013-02-14 Thread Barry Norton



Tomas, there was a problem on some Windows platforms with your build 
(hence my question) that was fixed in the 5777 release:

http://owlim.ontotext.com/display/OWLIMv53/OWLIM-Enterprise+Release+Notes#OWLIM-EnterpriseReleaseNotes-Version5.3%28build5777%29

Could I get you to upgrade and re-try?

Cheers,

Barry


On 14/02/13 16:02, Tomas Vileiniškis wrote:
Sorry, forgot to include these in the first email. I'm using 
owlim-enterprise-5.3.5689 and Win Server 2008 R2 Standart 64-bit.


Tomas

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Barry Norton 
mailto:barry.nor...@ontotext.com>> wrote:



Tomas, which version/build of OWLIM-Enterprise are you using, and
on which platform (OS)?

Barry



On 14/02/13 15:46, Tomas Vileiniškis wrote:


Hi list/devs,


I’ve tried everything, but the “online backup” mechanism doesn’t
seem to work for me. As per instructions outlined in documentation:

MasterReplicationPort – set to 8091 (unused, open)

MasterURL – set to
http://master_IP:8080/openrdf-sesame/repositories/master_1

Directory used for the backup image - C:\Users\test\Desktop\backup

A few seconds after invoking the backup operation, I get the
standard “Method successfully invoked” message, however nothing
happens and no backup image is created. Here are the logs:

From the master node:

[INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:26:31,581 [RMI TCP
Connection(14)-master_IP] Started taking Backup to
C:\Users\test\Desktop\back

[INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:27:01,643 [backup] timeout to connect
elapsed. aborting.

[INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:27:01,987 [RMI TCP
Connection(14)-master_IP] Master (??)
http://Worker_node_2_IP:8080/openrdf-sesame/repositories/worker_2
successfully received backup data.

From the worker node (that is used to get the image from):

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:37,253 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=1

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:38,753 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=2

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:40,253 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=3

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:41,769 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=4

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:43,269 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=5

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:44,769 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=6

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:46,269 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=7

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:47,784 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=8

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:49,300 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=9

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:50,800 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=10

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:52,331 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=11

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:53,831 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=12

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:55,331 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=13

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:56,862 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=14

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:58,362 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=15

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:59,862 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=16

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:01,362 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=17

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:02,862 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=18

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:04,362 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=19

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:05,894 [repositories/worker_2]
Connection refused: connect, retries left=20

[INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:27:05,894 [repositories/worker_2] aborting ...

I tried to change the MasterReplicationPort, backup directory
path, but that didn’t help. Just to note, the normal replication
between nodes works fine.

Any suggestions?


Regards,

Tomas



___
Owlim-discussion mailing list
Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com  
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion



___
Owlim-discussion mailing list
Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com 
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion




___
Owlim-discussion mailing list
Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Can't get "Online Backup and Restore" to work in OWLIM Enterprise

2013-02-14 Thread Tomas Vileiniškis

Sorry, forgot to include these in the first email. I'm using
owlim-enterprise-5.3.5689 and Win Server 2008 R2 Standart 64-bit.

Tomas

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Barry Norton wrote:

>
> Tomas, which version/build of OWLIM-Enterprise are you using, and on which
> platform (OS)?
>
> Barry
>
>
>
> On 14/02/13 15:46, Tomas Vileiniškis wrote:
>
> Hi list/devs,
>
>
>  I've tried everything, but the "online backup" mechanism doesn't seem to
> work for me. As per instructions outlined in documentation:
>
>
>
> MasterReplicationPort - set to 8091 (unused, open)
>
> MasterURL - set to
> http://master_IP:8080/openrdf-sesame/repositories/master_1
>
> Directory used for the backup image - C:\Users\test\Desktop\backup
>
> A few seconds after invoking the backup operation, I get the standard
> "Method successfully invoked" message, however nothing happens and no
> backup image is created. Here are the logs:
>
>
>
> From the master node:
>
> [INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:26:31,581 [RMI TCP Connection(14)-master_IP] Started
> taking Backup to C:\Users\test\Desktop\back
>
> [INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:27:01,643 [backup] timeout to connect elapsed.
> aborting.
>
> [INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:27:01,987 [RMI TCP Connection(14)-master_IP] Master
> (??) 
> http://Worker_node_2_IP:8080/openrdf-sesame/repositories/worker_2successfully 
> received backup data.
>
>
>
> From the worker node (that is used to get the image from):
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:37,253 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=1
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:38,753 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=2
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:40,253 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=3
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:41,769 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=4
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:43,269 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=5
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:44,769 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=6
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:46,269 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=7
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:47,784 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=8
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:49,300 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=9
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:50,800 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=10
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:52,331 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=11
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:53,831 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=12
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:55,331 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=13
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:56,862 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=14
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:58,362 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=15
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:59,862 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=16
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:01,362 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=17
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:02,862 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=18
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:04,362 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=19
>
> [WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:05,894 [repositories/worker_2] Connection
> refused: connect, retries left=20
>
> [INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:27:05,894 [repositories/worker_2] aborting ...
>
>
>
> I tried to change the MasterReplicationPort, backup directory path, but
> that didn't help. Just to note, the normal replication between nodes works
> fine.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
>
>  Regards,
>
> Tomas
>
>
> ___
> Owlim-discussion mailing 
> listOwlim-discussion@ontotext.comhttp://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion
>
>
>
> ___
> Owlim-discussion mailing list
> Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
> http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion
>
>
___
Owlim-discussion mailing list
Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Can't get "Online Backup and Restore" to work in OWLIM Enterprise

2013-02-14 Thread Barry Norton



Tomas, which version/build of OWLIM-Enterprise are you using, and on 
which platform (OS)?


Barry


On 14/02/13 15:46, Tomas Vileinis(kis wrote:


Hi list/devs,


I've tried everything, but the "online backup" mechanism doesn't seem 
to work for me. As per instructions outlined in documentation:


MasterReplicationPort -- set to 8091 (unused, open)

MasterURL -- set to 
http://master_IP:8080/openrdf-sesame/repositories/master_1


Directory used for the backup image - C:\Users\test\Desktop\backup

A few seconds after invoking the backup operation, I get the standard 
"Method successfully invoked" message, however nothing happens and no 
backup image is created. Here are the logs:


From the master node:

[INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:26:31,581 [RMI TCP Connection(14)-master_IP] 
Started taking Backup to C:\Users\test\Desktop\back


[INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:27:01,643 [backup] timeout to connect elapsed. 
aborting.


[INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:27:01,987 [RMI TCP Connection(14)-master_IP] 
Master (??) 
http://Worker_node_2_IP:8080/openrdf-sesame/repositories/worker_2 
successfully received backup data.


From the worker node (that is used to get the image from):

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:37,253 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=1


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:38,753 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=2


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:40,253 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=3


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:41,769 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=4


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:43,269 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=5


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:44,769 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=6


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:46,269 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=7


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:47,784 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=8


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:49,300 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=9


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:50,800 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=10


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:52,331 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=11


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:53,831 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=12


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:55,331 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=13


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:56,862 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=14


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:58,362 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=15


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:59,862 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=16


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:01,362 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=17


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:02,862 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=18


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:04,362 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=19


[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:05,894 [repositories/worker_2] Connection 
refused: connect, retries left=20


[INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:27:05,894 [repositories/worker_2] aborting ...

I tried to change the MasterReplicationPort, backup directory path, 
but that didn't help. Just to note, the normal replication between 
nodes works fine.


Any suggestions?


Regards,

Tomas



___
Owlim-discussion mailing list
Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion


___
Owlim-discussion mailing list
Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion

[Owlim-discussion] Can't get "Online Backup and Restore" to work in OWLIM Enterprise

2013-02-14 Thread Tomas Vileiniškis

Hi list/devs,


I’ve tried everything, but the “online backup” mechanism doesn’t seem to
work for me. As per instructions outlined in documentation:



MasterReplicationPort – set to 8091 (unused, open)

MasterURL – set to
http://master_IP:8080/openrdf-sesame/repositories/master_1

Directory used for the backup image - C:\Users\test\Desktop\backup

A few seconds after invoking the backup operation, I get the standard
“Method successfully invoked” message, however nothing happens and no
backup image is created. Here are the logs:



>From the master node:

[INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:26:31,581 [RMI TCP Connection(14)-master_IP] Started
taking Backup to C:\Users\test\Desktop\back

[INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:27:01,643 [backup] timeout to connect elapsed.
aborting.

[INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:27:01,987 [RMI TCP Connection(14)-master_IP] Master
(??) 
http://Worker_node_2_IP:8080/openrdf-sesame/repositories/worker_2successfully
received backup data.



>From the worker node (that is used to get the image from):

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:37,253 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=1

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:38,753 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=2

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:40,253 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=3

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:41,769 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=4

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:43,269 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=5

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:44,769 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=6

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:46,269 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=7

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:47,784 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=8

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:49,300 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=9

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:50,800 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=10

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:52,331 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=11

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:53,831 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=12

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:55,331 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=13

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:56,862 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=14

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:58,362 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=15

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:26:59,862 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=16

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:01,362 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=17

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:02,862 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=18

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:04,362 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=19

[WARN ] 2013-02-14 16:27:05,894 [repositories/worker_2] Connection refused:
connect, retries left=20

[INFO ] 2013-02-14 16:27:05,894 [repositories/worker_2] aborting ...



I tried to change the MasterReplicationPort, backup directory path, but
that didn’t help. Just to note, the normal replication between nodes works
fine.

Any suggestions?


Regards,

Tomas
___
Owlim-discussion mailing list
Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Query strange behavior

2013-02-14 Thread Barry Norton



Marec, since I didn't hear yet I tried a couple of assumed statements:

PREFIX : 
PREFIX rdfs: 
INSERT DATA {
:i a :C ;
   rdfs:label "wordnet" .
}

Then:

PREFIX luc: 
INSERT DATA
{
  luc:index luc:setParam "uris" .
  luc:include luc:setParam "literals" .
  luc:moleculeSize luc:setParam "1" .
  luc:includePredicates luc:setParam 
"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label 
http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel"; .

#luc:analyzer luc:setParam "my.own.analyzer" .
}

(Note, I had to remove your analyzer)

Then:

PREFIX luc: 
ASK
{
  luc:sestateIndex luc:createIndex "true" .
}

Now I get one binding from:

PREFIX rdfs:
PREFIX luc: 
SELECT DISTINCT ?value ?label ?score
FROM NAMED 
{ ?value luc:sestateIndex "word*"^^xsd:string .
  ?value rdfs:label ?label .
  ?value luc:score ?score . }

And the same binding from your query:

PREFIX rdfs:
PREFIX luc: 
SELECT DISTINCT ?key ?value ?label ?score FROM NAMED 
 { ?value luc:sestateIndex 
"word*"^^xsd:string . ?value luc:score ?score . ?value rdfs:label ?label 
.  GRAPH  { ?value rdf:type ?key } .  }


In the absence of your instance data I remain, therefore, unable to 
reproduce an issue.


Barry



On 14/02/13 11:26, Barry Norton wrote:


But that's what I mean, that's not reproducable - I'm missing some 
instance data.


I assumed OWL-Horst and added only:

PREFIX luc: 
INSERT DATA
{
  luc:index luc:setParam "uris" .
  luc:include luc:setParam "literals" .
  luc:moleculeSize luc:setParam "1" .
  luc:includePredicates luc:setParam 
"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label 
http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel"; .

  luc:analyzer luc:setParam "my.own.analyzer" .
  luc:sestateIndex luc:createIndex "true" .
}

And there were no bindings (as expected) for:

PREFIX rdfs:
PREFIX luc: 
SELECT DISTINCT ?key ?value ?label ?score
FROM NAMED 
{ ?value luc:sestateIndex "word*"^^xsd:string .
  ?value rdfs:label ?label .
  GRAPH  { ?value rdf:type ?key } .  }

Just as an observation, along the way: one cannot depend on (since the 
optimiser is free to re-order) your 'setParam's being executed before 
your 'createIndex', so you should really issue two separate sequential 
updates to achieve this indexing.


If you can provide some minimal set of instances with your problem I 
can look further.


Cheers,

Barry


On 14/02/13 11:16, Marek Šurek wrote:

Hi Barry,
the ?key represents explicit rdf:type of element (we use subClassOf 
inferencing, but I don't want those infered rdf:types for ?key 
variable). The query itself is bigger, but this is minimal part of it 
where problem appears. Other rules are not connected to this.


Id: rdfs9
 ax [Constraint x != y]
 xy
---
 ay


Id: rdfs11
 xy [Constraint x != y, x != z, y != z]
 yz
---
 xz


Thank you for your answer,
Marek


*From:* Barry Norton 
*To:* owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
*Sent:* Thursday, 14 February 2013, 12:10
*Subject:* Re: [Owlim-discussion] Query strange behavior


Marek, I'm struggling to understand your query.

You have a clause GRAPH  
 { ?value rdf:type ?key } but if 
the INSERT represents all of your explicit statement there are none 
with explicit classification (i.e. pred=type).


Are you saying that:

SELECT DISTINCT ?key ?value ?label ?score
FROM NAMED  


{ ?value luc:sestateIndex "word*"^^xsd:string .
  ?value rdfs:label ?label .
  GRAPH  
 { ?value rdf:type ?key } .  }


Works over:

INSERT DATA
{
  luc:index luc:setParam "uris" .
  luc:include luc:setParam "literals" .
  luc:moleculeSize luc:setParam "1" .
  luc:includePredicates luc:setParam 
"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label 
http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel";

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Query strange behavior

2013-02-14 Thread Barry Norton



But that's what I mean, that's not reproducable - I'm missing some 
instance data.


I assumed OWL-Horst and added only:

PREFIX luc: 
INSERT DATA
{
  luc:index luc:setParam "uris" .
  luc:include luc:setParam "literals" .
  luc:moleculeSize luc:setParam "1" .
  luc:includePredicates luc:setParam 
"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label 
http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel"; .

  luc:analyzer luc:setParam "my.own.analyzer" .
  luc:sestateIndex luc:createIndex "true" .
}

And there were no bindings (as expected) for:

PREFIX rdfs:
PREFIX luc: 
SELECT DISTINCT ?key ?value ?label ?score
FROM NAMED 
{ ?value luc:sestateIndex "word*"^^xsd:string .
  ?value rdfs:label ?label .
  GRAPH  { ?value rdf:type ?key } .  }

Just as an observation, along the way: one cannot depend on (since the 
optimiser is free to re-order) your 'setParam's being executed before 
your 'createIndex', so you should really issue two separate sequential 
updates to achieve this indexing.


If you can provide some minimal set of instances with your problem I can 
look further.


Cheers,

Barry


On 14/02/13 11:16, Marek Šurek wrote:

Hi Barry,
the ?key represents explicit rdf:type of element (we use subClassOf 
inferencing, but I don't want those infered rdf:types for ?key 
variable). The query itself is bigger, but this is minimal part of it 
where problem appears. Other rules are not connected to this.


Id: rdfs9
 ax [Constraint x != y]
 xy
---
 ay


Id: rdfs11
 xy  [Constraint x != y, x != 
z, y != z]

 yz
---
 xz


Thank you for your answer,
Marek


*From:* Barry Norton 
*To:* owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
*Sent:* Thursday, 14 February 2013, 12:10
*Subject:* Re: [Owlim-discussion] Query strange behavior


Marek, I'm struggling to understand your query.

You have a clause GRAPH  
 { ?value rdf:type ?key } but if the 
INSERT represents all of your explicit statement there are none with 
explicit classification (i.e. pred=type).


Are you saying that:

SELECT DISTINCT ?key ?value ?label ?score
FROM NAMED  


{ ?value luc:sestateIndex "word*"^^xsd:string .
  ?value rdfs:label ?label .
  GRAPH  
 { ?value rdf:type ?key } .  }


Works over:

INSERT DATA
{
  luc:index luc:setParam "uris" .
  luc:include luc:setParam "literals" .
  luc:moleculeSize luc:setParam "1" .
  luc:includePredicates luc:setParam 
"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label 
http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel"; 
 
.

  luc:analyzer luc:setParam "my.own.analyzer" .
  luc:sestateIndex luc:createIndex "true" .
}


What, in that case, is bound to ?key ?

Unless I misunderstood, could you tell me which ruleset you used so I 
can try to recreate?


Barry


On 14/02/13 11:02, Marek Šurek wrote:

Hi everyone,
I experienced strange behavior during query answering, but Im not 
sure where can be problem.

This query is not working(no results returned) :
SELECT DISTINCT ?key ?value ?label ?score FROM NAMED 
  
{ ?value luc:sestateIndex "word*"^^xsd:string . ?value luc:score 
?score . ?value rdfs:label ?label .  GRAPH 
  
{ ?value rdf:type ?key } .  }


but if I remove one of these (no matter which one)
?value rdfs:label ?label . OR GRAPH 
  
{ ?value rdf:type ?key} OR ?value luc:score ?score
suddelny all is perfectly working as I expect. Lucene index is 
properly created by this query :


INSERT DATA
{
  luc:index luc:setParam "uris" .
  luc:include luc:setParam "literals" .
  luc:moleculeSize luc:setParam "1" .
  luc:includePredicates luc:setParam 
"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label 
http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel"; 
 
.

  luc:analyzer luc:setParam "my.own.analyzer" .
  luc:sestateIndex luc:createIndex "true" .

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Query strange behavior

2013-02-14 Thread Marek Šurek

Hi Barry,
the ?key represents explicit rdf:type of element (we use subClassOf 
inferencing, but I don't want those infered rdf:types for ?key variable). The 
query itself is bigger, but this is minimal part of it where problem appears. 
Other rules are not connected to this.

Id: rdfs9
 a    x [Constraint x != y]
 x    y
    ---
 a    y


Id: rdfs11
 x    y  [Constraint x != y, x != z, y != 
z]
 y    z
    ---
 x    z



Thank you for your answer,
Marek




 From: Barry Norton 
To: owlim-discussion@ontotext.com 
Sent: Thursday, 14 February 2013, 12:10
Subject: Re: [Owlim-discussion] Query strange behavior
 


Marek, I'm struggling to understand your query.

You have a clause GRAPH  { ?value rdf:type 
?key } but if the INSERT represents all of your explicit statement there are 
none with explicit classification (i.e. pred=type).

Are you saying that:


SELECT DISTINCT ?key ?value ?label ?score 
FROM NAMED  
{ ?value luc:sestateIndex "word*"^^xsd:string . 
  ?value rdfs:label ?label .  
  GRAPH  { ?value rdf:type ?key } .  } 


Works over:


INSERT DATA 
            {
                  luc:index luc:setParam "uris" . 
                  luc:include luc:setParam "literals" . 
                  luc:moleculeSize luc:setParam "1" .
                  luc:includePredicates luc:setParam 
"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label 
http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel"; .
                  luc:analyzer luc:setParam "my.own.analyzer" .
                  luc:sestateIndex luc:createIndex "true" . 
            }


What, in that case, is bound to ?key ?

Unless I misunderstood, could you tell me which ruleset you used
  so I can try to recreate?

Barry


On 14/02/13 11:02, Marek Šurek wrote:

Hi everyone,
>I experienced strange behavior during query answering, but Im not sure where 
>can be problem.
>This query is not working(no results returned) : 
>
>SELECT DISTINCT ?key ?value ?label ?score FROM NAMED 
> { ?value luc:sestateIndex 
>"word*"^^xsd:string . ?value luc:score ?score . ?value rdfs:label ?label .  
>GRAPH  { ?value rdf:type ?key } .  } 
>
>
>
>but if I remove one of these (no matter which one)
>
>?value rdfs:label ?label . OR GRAPH  { 
>?value rdf:type ?key} OR ?value luc:score ?score 
>suddelny all is perfectly working as I expect. Lucene index is properly 
>created by this query :
>
>
>INSERT DATA 
>            {
>                  luc:index luc:setParam "uris" . 
>                  luc:include luc:setParam "literals" . 
>                  luc:moleculeSize luc:setParam "1" .
>                  luc:includePredicates luc:setParam 
>"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label 
>http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel"; .
>                  luc:analyzer luc:setParam "my.own.analyzer"
  .
>                  luc:sestateIndex luc:createIndex "true" . 
>            }
>
>
>
>Could you guide me to possible solution for this?
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>Marek
>
>
>
>___
Owlim-discussion mailing list Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com 
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion 

___
Owlim-discussion mailing list
Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion___
Owlim-discussion mailing list
Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Query strange behavior

2013-02-14 Thread Barry Norton



Marek, I'm struggling to understand your query.

You have a clause GRAPH  { ?value 
rdf:type ?key } but if the INSERT represents all of your explicit 
statement there are none with explicit classification (i.e. pred=type).


Are you saying that:

SELECT DISTINCT ?key ?value ?label ?score
FROM NAMED 
{ ?value luc:sestateIndex "word*"^^xsd:string .
  ?value rdfs:label ?label .
  GRAPH  { ?value rdf:type ?key } .  }

Works over:

INSERT DATA
{
  luc:index luc:setParam "uris" .
  luc:include luc:setParam "literals" .
  luc:moleculeSize luc:setParam "1" .
  luc:includePredicates luc:setParam 
"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label 
http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel"; .

  luc:analyzer luc:setParam "my.own.analyzer" .
  luc:sestateIndex luc:createIndex "true" .
}


What, in that case, is bound to ?key ?

Unless I misunderstood, could you tell me which ruleset you used so I 
can try to recreate?


Barry


On 14/02/13 11:02, Marek S(urek wrote:

Hi everyone,
I experienced strange behavior during query answering, but Im not sure 
where can be problem.

This query is not working(no results returned) :
SELECT DISTINCT ?key ?value ?label ?score FROM NAMED 
 { ?value luc:sestateIndex 
"word*"^^xsd:string . ?value luc:score ?score . ?value rdfs:label 
?label .  GRAPH  { ?value rdf:type 
?key } .  }


but if I remove one of these (no matter which one)
?value rdfs:label ?label . OR GRAPH  
{ ?value rdf:type ?key} OR ?value luc:score ?score
suddelny all is perfectly working as I expect. Lucene index is 
properly created by this query :


INSERT DATA
{
  luc:index luc:setParam "uris" .
  luc:include luc:setParam "literals" .
  luc:moleculeSize luc:setParam "1" .
  luc:includePredicates luc:setParam 
"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label 
http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel"; .

  luc:analyzer luc:setParam "my.own.analyzer" .
  luc:sestateIndex luc:createIndex "true" .
}

Could you guide me to possible solution for this?

Best regards,
Marek


___
Owlim-discussion mailing list
Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion


___
Owlim-discussion mailing list
Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion

[Owlim-discussion] Query strange behavior

2013-02-14 Thread Marek Šurek

Hi everyone,
I experienced strange behavior during query answering, but Im not sure where 
can be problem.
This query is not working(no results returned) : 

SELECT DISTINCT ?key ?value ?label ?score FROM NAMED 
 { ?value luc:sestateIndex 
"word*"^^xsd:string . ?value luc:score ?score . ?value rdfs:label ?label .  
GRAPH  { ?value rdf:type ?key } .  } 


but if I remove one of these (no matter which one)

?value rdfs:label ?label . OR GRAPH  { ?value 
rdf:type ?key} OR ?value luc:score ?score 
suddelny all is perfectly working as I expect. Lucene index is properly created 
by this query :

INSERT DATA 
            {
                  luc:index luc:setParam "uris" . 
                  luc:include luc:setParam "literals" . 
                  luc:moleculeSize luc:setParam "1" .
                  luc:includePredicates luc:setParam 
"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label 
http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel"; .
                  luc:analyzer luc:setParam "my.own.analyzer" .
                  luc:sestateIndex luc:createIndex "true" . 
            }


Could you guide me to possible solution for this?

Best regards,

Marek
___
Owlim-discussion mailing list
Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Can't get "Online Backup and Restore" to work in OWLIM Enterprise

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Can't get "Online Backup and Restore" to work in OWLIM Enterprise

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Can't get "Online Backup and Restore" to work in OWLIM Enterprise

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Can't get "Online Backup and Restore" to work in OWLIM Enterprise

[Owlim-discussion] Can't get "Online Backup and Restore" to work in OWLIM Enterprise

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Query strange behavior

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Query strange behavior

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Query strange behavior

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Query strange behavior

[Owlim-discussion] Query strange behavior

10 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information