Re: Technology euology
I think people who have WCF stuff they can't get rid of in a hurry who want to move away from full .net framework are maybe the intended audience On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 19:20, Greg Keogh wrote: > WCF Core... It lives on >> https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF >> > > I don't know why they bothered. I can't easily imagine any situation where > you would want to take a Framework WCF service and port it to Core. Use > some newer libraries or features maybe? But you might as well try to strip > the layers off the core service code and divide and conquer to upgrade. No > one in their right mind would actually want to write new stuff using WCF, > so the whole project leaves me rather bewildered. > > OpenSilver, web assembly version of Silverlight >> https://www.opensilver.net/ >> > > I looked at that a couple of years ago, and it was completely ludicrous. A > gigantic tangle of HTML5 trying to do what Silverlight did without the > milcore-like rendering power. > > *Greg K* >
Re: Technology euology
> > WCF Core... It lives on > https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF > I don't know why they bothered. I can't easily imagine any situation where you would want to take a Framework WCF service and port it to Core. Use some newer libraries or features maybe? But you might as well try to strip the layers off the core service code and divide and conquer to upgrade. No one in their right mind would actually want to write new stuff using WCF, so the whole project leaves me rather bewildered. OpenSilver, web assembly version of Silverlight > https://www.opensilver.net/ > I looked at that a couple of years ago, and it was completely ludicrous. A gigantic tangle of HTML5 trying to do what Silverlight did without the milcore-like rendering power. *Greg K*
Re: Technology euology
WCF Core... It lives on https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF OpenSilver, web assembly version of Silverlight https://www.opensilver.net/ On Tue, 29 Mar 2022, 4:09 pm Greg Keogh, wrote: > Hi Tom, it's not Friday but... > > WCF - I can still remember Juval Lowy telling us how it will solve all our >> problems lol >> > > Still good riddance. I think it took me 2 years to find a working sample > of how to make a "behavior" to put out-of-band data in the traffic headers. > I wonder how many man-years I spent editing WCF config file sections > > >> Blazor - done a few business apps now with this and found it quite >> simple. Unfortunately I still don’t see the market here in Aus taking it >> seriously. >> > > My spidey-sense is seeing steadily increasing Blazor articles, meetups and > 3rd party support, so I think it's pretty serious. I said several weeks ago > that server-side web apps are dead to me thanks to Blazor (but it's no > Silverlight!!) > > *Greg* >
