Re: [OT] Patchd radiation reducer
Whatever happened to false advertising??? Seems like anything goes these days On Monday, 22 February 2016, Ken Schaefer <k...@adopenstatic.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > Googling PatchD finds some stuff you can read (from memory – looked this > up for a friend several months ago). > > > > That all said, if there was some way of magically reducing harmful > emissions by 75%+ for the cost of some cheap raw materials, every phone > manufacturer would have already done it. It’d cost them a few cents to > implement, and they could market their phones as having 75% fewer harmful > emissions. > > > > Basically, these things are a scam. > > > > *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com');> [mailto: > ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com');>] *On > Behalf Of *Bec C > *Sent:* Friday, 19 February 2016 6:42 PM > *To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com');>> > *Subject:* Re: [OT] Patchd radiation reducer > > > > Where would I even look for the current scientific data? > > > > Cheers > > On Friday, 19 February 2016, Greg Keogh <gfke...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gfke...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > > Has any body any information about how well the Patchd radiation reducing > thing works? I can't seem to find much info besides the main site > patchd.com > > > > It's an old scam that feeds off fear. > > > > *The Federal Government’s safety watchdog, the Australian Radiation > Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), does not recommend the use > of products that attach to a phone and advertised as neutralising any > harmful effects. “The claims are not consistent with current scientific > knowledge and it is difficult, if not impossible, to verify any benefits,” > it says in a fact sheet.* > > > > Greg > > -- Thanks Tom
RE: [OT] Patchd radiation reducer
Hi, Googling PatchD finds some stuff you can read (from memory – looked this up for a friend several months ago). That all said, if there was some way of magically reducing harmful emissions by 75%+ for the cost of some cheap raw materials, every phone manufacturer would have already done it. It’d cost them a few cents to implement, and they could market their phones as having 75% fewer harmful emissions. Basically, these things are a scam. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Bec C Sent: Friday, 19 February 2016 6:42 PM To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> Subject: Re: [OT] Patchd radiation reducer Where would I even look for the current scientific data? Cheers On Friday, 19 February 2016, Greg Keogh <gfke...@gmail.com<mailto:gfke...@gmail.com>> wrote: Has any body any information about how well the Patchd radiation reducing thing works? I can't seem to find much info besides the main site patchd.com<http://patchd.com> It's an old scam that feeds off fear. The Federal Government’s safety watchdog, the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), does not recommend the use of products that attach to a phone and advertised as neutralising any harmful effects. “The claims are not consistent with current scientific knowledge and it is difficult, if not impossible, to verify any benefits,” it says in a fact sheet. Greg
Re: [OT] Patchd radiation reducer
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 at 17:41 Bec Cwrote: > Where would I even look for the current scientific data? On radiation effects of mobiles or whether the device does what it says? They're two separate things. For the former some medical journals and research. For the latter you can probably test it yourself easily if you find an app that dumps your phones radio stats. Without researching I would bet that the device DOES do what it says in terms of lowering the SAR effectiveness of your phone (which the phone will compensate for by thinking it is in a shit coverage area and dialling up its transmit power). I did read something specifically about those patches that said that some woman or other developed breast cancer in the shape of a mobile phone from sticking her phone down her bra. Survey says, bulshitt. If it were true she would have developed breast cancer in the same of the phone's antenna. David. >> -- David Connors da...@connors.com | @davidconnors | LinkedIn | +61 417 189 363
Re: [OT] Patchd radiation reducer
Where would I even look for the current scientific data? Cheers On Friday, 19 February 2016, Greg Keoghwrote: > Has any body any information about how well the Patchd radiation reducing >>> thing works? I can't seem to find much info besides the main site >>> patchd.com >>> >> > It's an old scam that feeds off fear. > > *The Federal Government’s safety watchdog, the Australian Radiation > Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), does not recommend the use > of products that attach to a phone and advertised as neutralising any > harmful effects. “The claims are not consistent with current scientific > knowledge and it is difficult, if not impossible, to verify any benefits,” > it says in a fact sheet.* > > Greg >
Re: [OT] Patchd radiation reducer
> > Has any body any information about how well the Patchd radiation reducing >> thing works? I can't seem to find much info besides the main site >> patchd.com >> > It's an old scam that feeds off fear. *The Federal Government’s safety watchdog, the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), does not recommend the use of products that attach to a phone and advertised as neutralising any harmful effects. “The claims are not consistent with current scientific knowledge and it is difficult, if not impossible, to verify any benefits,” it says in a fact sheet.* Greg
Re: [OT] Patchd radiation reducer
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 at 16:51 Bec Cwrote: > Has any body any information about how well the Patchd radiation reducing > thing works? I can't seem to find much info besides the main site > patchd.com > It works on the principle of finding unsuspecting people who react strongly to cancer scares and lightening their wallets. If it actually does what it says it will probably make your phone go flat faster too. David. > -- David Connors da...@connors.com | @davidconnors | LinkedIn | +61 417 189 363
[OT] Patchd radiation reducer
Hey all Has any body any information about how well the Patchd radiation reducing thing works? I can't seem to find much info besides the main site patchd.com Cheers