Re: [ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite systems

2006-05-01 Thread Sally-Anne Brown



yes and the company that sells them had a stand at 
the icm and quoted one hospital where i worked abt 500, 000 bucks to set up 
three rooms with their machines and the midwives station desk etc (of course the 
true costs only came out when we dragged it out of them). i wondered what 
the women would think abt their 500,000 been spent in this way. 

not to mention the very basics that had not been 
covered like NOT using dodgy paper soCTG's can also be stored over the 35 
odd yearsrequired.

Sally-Anne (Brown)

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kelly @ 
  BellyBelly 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 1:55 
PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite 
  systems
  
  
  I was at a birth the last few days 
  @ RWH and the midwives were telling me hospitals (RWH included) are soon 
  changing to new EFM machines which are linked to a satellite system, so women 
  can be monitored by the midwives from the ward desk. They were joking about it 
  too, how they could have a loudspeaker go off and ask them to adjust the 
  monitor next, should it not be in the right spot. Does anyone know anything 
  more about this and what are your thoughts? One to one midwifery care seems 
  further off sometimes, which is very, very sad…
  Best Regards,Kelly ZanteyCreator, 
  BellyBelly.com.au 
  Gentle 
  Solutions From Conception to ParenthoodBellyBelly Birth 
  Support - 
  http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support
  
  
  

  No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free 
  Edition.Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.1/328 - Release Date: 
  1/05/2006
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.1/328 - Release Date: 1/05/2006


Re: [ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite systems

2006-05-01 Thread Emily
well that certainly blows out of the water the
argument that intermittent auscultation cant be done
because the staff dont have time. how many extra MWs
could be employed for one to one care with an extra
half a million??

--- Sally-Anne Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 yes and the company that sells them had a stand at
 the icm and quoted one hospital where i worked abt
 500, 000 bucks to set up three rooms with their
 machines and the midwives station desk etc (of
 course the true costs only came out when we dragged
 it out of them).  i wondered what the women would
 think abt their 500,000 been spent in this way. 
 
 not to mention the very basics that had not been
 covered like NOT using dodgy paper so CTG's can also
 be stored over the 35 odd years required.
 
 Sally-Anne (Brown)
   - Original Message - 
   From: Kelly @ BellyBelly 
   To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
   Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 1:55 PM
   Subject: [ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite systems
 
 
   I was at a birth the last few days @ RWH and the
 midwives were telling me hospitals (RWH included)
 are soon changing to new EFM machines which are
 linked to a satellite system, so women can be
 monitored by the midwives from the ward desk. They
 were joking about it too, how they could have a
 loudspeaker go off and ask them to adjust the
 monitor next, should it not be in the right spot.
 Does anyone know anything more about this and what
 are your thoughts? One to one midwifery care seems
 further off sometimes, which is very, very sad.
 
   Best Regards,
 
   Kelly Zantey
   Creator, BellyBelly.com.au 
   Gentle Solutions From Conception to Parenthood
   BellyBelly Birth Support -
 http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support
 

 
 
 

--
 
 
   No virus found in this incoming message.
   Checked by AVG Free Edition.
   Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.1/328 -
 Release Date: 1/05/2006
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.1/328 -
 Release Date: 1/05/2006
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite systems

2006-04-29 Thread sharon



sue that is sad, i also work at a large hospital in 
adelaide and this certainly never happens as it is hospital protocol that all 
women who are on ctg have a midwife with them, i hope your expereinces elsewhere 
are better than that particular one.
regards

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Sue 
  Cookson 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 10:19 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] EFM on 
  satellite systems
  Hi,I was a student at a large Adelaide hospital and last 
  year I witnessedmost of the midwives staying at the front desk for most of 
  the time watching 'their' women's CTGs.I found it appalling - that we as 
  students were observing this as modern midwifery management; that the women 
  were treated with such lack of compassion and skill; that this was a large 
  teaching hospital - no wonder most of the young doctors have no idea about 
  normal birth.Needless to say I complained to appropriate sources and have 
  refused to revisit that hospital for a clinical placement.Let me get a 
  sore back and dirty knees any day and maybe I'd also have some idea of the 
  woman I was assisting through birth and some idea of how I could help her 
  achieve what she wanted.Sue
  



the efm on satellite systems does not subsitute 
for the registered midwife in the rooms. We have this at the hosp that i 
work in and you still have to stay in the room with the woman whilst 
she is labouring. Not all clients are on moniters and some are 
intermittenly monitored with a doppler hand held. I find this appaling that 
the midwives can even think of not bieng in the room with the woman and her 
partner during labour. They are used as a sort of backup so the shift 
co-ordinator can see what is happening in the room and also for the medical 
officer who is always in the labour ward to glance at sometimes as the 
individual midwife in the room's ability may be on different levels it is 
like a saftey system i guess for both the woman and the midwife attending 
her.
regards 

  - 
  Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kelly 
  @ BellyBelly 
  To: 
  ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: 
  Friday, April 28, 2006 1:25 PM
  Subject: 
  [ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite systems
  
  
  I was at a birth the last few 
  days @ RWH and the midwives were telling me hospitals (RWH included) are 
  soon changing to new EFM machines which are linked to a satellite system, 
  so women can be monitored by the midwives from the ward desk. They were 
  joking about it too, how they could have a loudspeaker go off and ask them 
  to adjust the monitor next, should it not be in the right spot. Does 
  anyone know anything more about this and what are your thoughts? One to 
  one midwifery care seems further off sometimes, which is very, very 
  sad…
  Best Regards,Kelly ZanteyCreator, 
  BellyBelly.com.au 
  Gentle Solutions 
  From Conception to ParenthoodBellyBelly Birth 
  Support - http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support
  __ 
NOD32 1.1454 (20060321) Information __This message was 
checked by NOD32 antivirus system.http://www.nod32.com


Re: [ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite systems

2006-04-29 Thread Lisa Barrett



Hi sue and Sharon, you are right this is 
sad.Any woman who has a problem that needs to be monitored shouldn't need 
a protocol to tell the midwife theyshould be in the room with their 
lady. In fact every midwife should stay with their lady whether they need 
monitoring or not. (And the research of the benefitsof 
continuous monitoring VS. intermittent monitoring with a continuous known carer 
should also be thought about). Any chance you could name the 
big hospitals you work at so that we can make our clinical assessments on 
your experiences. 
Lisa

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  sharon 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 5:41 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] EFM on 
  satellite systems
  
  sue that is sad, i also work at a large hospital 
  in adelaide and this certainly never happens as it is hospital protocol that 
  all women who are on ctg have a midwife with them, i hope your expereinces 
  elsewhere are better than that particular one.
  regards
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Sue Cookson 
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 

Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 10:19 
AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] EFM on 
satellite systems
Hi,I was a student at a large Adelaide hospital and last 
year I witnessedmost of the midwives staying at the front desk for most 
of the time watching 'their' women's CTGs.I found it appalling - that we 
as students were observing this as modern midwifery management; that the 
women were treated with such lack of compassion and skill; that this was a 
large teaching hospital - no wonder most of the young doctors have no idea 
about normal birth.Needless to say I complained to appropriate sources 
and have refused to revisit that hospital for a clinical 
placement.Let me get a sore back and dirty knees any day and maybe 
I'd also have some idea of the woman I was assisting through birth and some 
idea of how I could help her achieve what she wanted.Sue

  
  

  the efm on satellite systems does not 
  subsitute for the registered midwife in the rooms. We have this at the 
  hosp that i work in and you still have to stay in the room with the 
  woman whilst she is labouring. Not all clients are on moniters and 
  some are intermittenly monitored with a doppler hand held. I find this 
  appaling that the midwives can even think of not bieng in the room with 
  the woman and her partner during labour. They are used as a sort of backup 
  so the shift co-ordinator can see what is happening in the room and also 
  for the medical officer who is always in the labour ward to glance at 
  sometimes as the individual midwife in the room's ability may be on 
  different levels it is like a saftey system i guess for both the woman and 
  the midwife attending her.
  regards 
  
- 
Original Message - 
From: 
Kelly @ BellyBelly 
To: 
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 

Sent: 
Friday, April 28, 2006 1:25 PM
Subject: 
[ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite systems


I was at a birth the last 
few days @ RWH and the midwives were telling me hospitals (RWH included) 
are soon changing to new EFM machines which are linked to a satellite 
system, so women can be monitored by the midwives from the ward desk. 
They were joking about it too, how they could have a loudspeaker go off 
and ask them to adjust the monitor next, should it not be in the right 
spot. Does anyone know anything more about this and what are your 
thoughts? One to one midwifery care seems further off sometimes, which 
is very, very sad…
Best 
Regards,Kelly 
ZanteyCreator, BellyBelly.com.au 
Gentle 
Solutions From Conception to ParenthoodBellyBelly Birth 
Support - http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support
__ 
  NOD32 1.1454 (20060321) Information __This message was 
  checked by NOD32 antivirus system.http://www.nod32.com


Re: [ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite systems

2006-04-28 Thread Janet Fraser



This from the hospital which 
claims to be extending it's birth centre ethos to LD? That's clearly a 
crock. I can't believe the lengths hospitals will go to in an effort to avoid 
dealing with CLIENTS in an appropriate and evidence based manner. This is up 
there with the new robot designed to labour and birth for training MWs and 
Obs.
J


Re: [ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite systems

2006-04-28 Thread sharon



the efm on satellite systems does not subsitute for 
the registered midwife in the rooms. We have this at the hosp that i work 
in and you still have to stay in the room with the woman whilst she is 
labouring. Not all clients are on moniters and some are intermittenly 
monitored with a doppler hand held. I find this appaling that the midwives can 
even think of not bieng in the room with the woman and her partner during 
labour. They are used as a sort of backup so the shift co-ordinator can see what 
is happening in the room and also for the medical officer who is always in the 
labour ward to glance at sometimes as the individual midwife in the room's 
ability may be on different levels it is like a saftey system i guess for both 
the woman and the midwife attending her.
regards 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kelly @ 
  BellyBelly 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 1:25 
PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite 
  systems
  
  
  I was at a birth the last few days 
  @ RWH and the midwives were telling me hospitals (RWH included) are soon 
  changing to new EFM machines which are linked to a satellite system, so women 
  can be monitored by the midwives from the ward desk. They were joking about it 
  too, how they could have a loudspeaker go off and ask them to adjust the 
  monitor next, should it not be in the right spot. Does anyone know anything 
  more about this and what are your thoughts? One to one midwifery care seems 
  further off sometimes, which is very, very sad…
  Best Regards,Kelly ZanteyCreator, 
  BellyBelly.com.au 
  Gentle 
  Solutions From Conception to ParenthoodBellyBelly Birth 
  Support - 
  http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support
  


Re: [ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite systems

2006-04-28 Thread Jo Watson
I thought it was more so that the woman wasn't stuck in the room - she can go for a walk to the coffee shop or in the garden or something.  Just to normalise labour a bit for those considered a bit more high risk.JoOn 28/04/2006, at 3:19 PM, sharon wrote:the efm on satellite systems does not subsitute for the registered midwife in the rooms. We have this at the hosp that i work in  and you still have to stay in the room with the woman whilst she is labouring. Not all clients are on moniters  and some are intermittenly monitored with a doppler hand held. I find this appaling that the midwives can even think of not bieng in the room with the woman and her partner during labour. They are used as a sort of backup so the shift co-ordinator can see what is happening in the room and also for the medical officer who is always in the labour ward to glance at sometimes as the individual midwife in the room's ability may be on different levels it is like a saftey system i guess for both the woman and the midwife attending her.regards- Original Message -From: Kelly @ BellyBellyTo: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSent: Friday, April 28, 2006 1:25 PMSubject: [ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite systemsI was at a birth the last few days @ RWH and the midwives were telling me hospitals (RWH included) are soon changing to new EFM machines which are linked to a satellite system, so women can be monitored by the midwives from the ward desk. They were joking about it too, how they could have a loudspeaker go off and ask them to adjust the monitor next, should it not be in the right spot. Does anyone know anything more about this and what are your thoughts? One to one midwifery care seems further off sometimes, which is very, very sad…Best Regards,Kelly ZanteyCreator, BellyBelly.com.au Gentle Solutions From Conception to ParenthoodBellyBelly Birth Support - http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support 

Re: [ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite systems

2006-04-28 Thread Emily
hi all  I think any move to make continuous monitoring easier to do is dangerous as it means more and more women will be subjected to it. im sure everyones aware of the huge cochrane review comparing intermittent aus with continuous monitoring. this looks at both high and low risk women and finds an increased incidence of caesareans and instrumental deliveries with no improvement in neonatal morbidity or mortality. so i think whether its done by satellite or not, it is largely a bad ideaif people are going to continue to use continuous monitoring anyway, satellite sounds on the surface to be a much better choice because of mobility and comfort   can it still be used if a woman if in water ?  Jo Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  I thought it was more so
 that the woman wasn't stuck in the room - she can go for a walk to the coffee shop or in the garden or something. Just to normalise labour a bit for those considered a bit more high risk.JoOn 28/04/2006, at 3:19 PM, sharon wrote:the efm on satellite systems does not subsitute for the registered midwife in the rooms. We have this at the hosp that i work in
 and you still have to stay in the room with the woman whilst she is labouring. Not all clients are on moniters and some are intermittenly monitored with a doppler hand held. I find this appaling that the midwives can even think of not bieng in the room with the woman and her partner during labour. They are used as a sort of backup so the shift co-ordinator can see what is happening in the room and also for the medical officer who is always in the labour ward to glance at sometimes as the individual midwife in the room's ability may be on different levels it is like a saftey system i guess for both the woman and the midwife attending her.  regards- Original Message -  From: Kelly @ BellyBelly  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au  Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 1:25 PM  Subject: [ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite systems  I was at a birth the last few days @ RWH and the midwives were telling me hospitals (RWH included) are soon changing to new EFM machines which are linked to a satellite system, so women can be monitored by the midwives from the ward desk. They were joking about it too, how they could have a loudspeaker go off and ask them to adjust the monitor next, should it not be in the right spot. Does anyone know anything more about this and what are your thoughts? One to one midwifery care seems further off sometimes, which is very, very sad…  Best Regards,Kelly ZanteyCreator, BellyBelly.com.au Gentle Solutions From Conception to ParenthoodBellyBelly Birth Support - http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support  
		Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make  PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.

Re: [ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite systems

2006-04-28 Thread Sue Cookson




Hi,
I was a student at a large Adelaide hospital and last year I witnessed
most of the midwives staying at the front desk for most of the time
watching 'their' women's CTGs.
I found it appalling - that we as students were observing this as
modern midwifery management; that the women were treated with such lack
of compassion and skill; that this was a large teaching hospital - no
wonder most of the young doctors have no idea about normal birth.
Needless to say I complained to appropriate sources and have refused to
revisit that hospital for a clinical placement.

Let me get a sore back and dirty knees any day and maybe I'd also have
some idea of the woman I was assisting through birth and some idea of
how I could help her achieve what she wanted.

Sue

  
  
  
  the efm on satellite systems does
not subsitute for the registered midwife in the rooms. We have this at
the hosp that i work in and you still have to stay in the room with
the woman whilst she is labouring. Not all clients are on moniters and
some are intermittenly monitored with a doppler hand held. I find this
appaling that the midwives can even think of not bieng in the room with
the woman and her partner during labour. They are used as a sort of
backup so the shift co-ordinator can see what is happening in the room
and also for the medical officer who is always in the labour ward to
glance at sometimes as the individual midwife in the room's ability may
be on different levels it is like a saftey system i guess for both the
woman and the midwife attending her.
  regards 
  
-
Original Message - 
From:
Kelly @ BellyBelly 
To:
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au

Sent:
Friday, April 28, 2006 1:25 PM
Subject:
[ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite systems



I was at a birth the last
few days @ RWH and the midwives were telling me hospitals (RWH
included) are soon changing to new EFM machines which are linked to a
satellite system, so women can be monitored by the midwives from the
ward desk. They were joking about it too, how they could have a
loudspeaker go off and ask them to adjust the monitor next, should it
not be in the right spot. Does anyone know anything more about this and
what are your thoughts? One to one midwifery care seems further off
sometimes, which is very, very sad
Best Regards,

Kelly Zantey
Creator, BellyBelly.com.au 
Gentle
Solutions From Conception to Parenthood
BellyBelly
Birth Support -
http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support


  
  
  
__ NOD32 1.1454 (20060321) Information __
  
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
  http://www.nod32.com






RE: [ozmidwifery] EFM on satellite systems

2006-04-27 Thread McAlpine, Joan (AHS)



Hi 
Kelly,

I 
worked with telemetry CTG's in 1986 at Westmead where everyon'es CTG could be 
seen at the desk (we were trying to escape back then as well). The 
patients couldn't move around then, but the newer telemetry units work without a 
central viewing area. I don't know about satellites but you never 
know. 

Joan

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kelly @ 
  BellyBellySent: Friday, 28 April 2006 13:55To: 
  ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: [ozmidwifery] EFM on 
  satellite systems
  
  I was at a birth the last few days 
  @ RWH and the midwives were telling me hospitals (RWH included) are soon 
  changing to new EFM machines which are linked to a satellite system, so women 
  can be monitored by the midwives from the ward desk. They were joking about it 
  too, how they could have a loudspeaker go off and ask them to adjust the 
  monitor next, should it not be in the right spot. Does anyone know anything 
  more about this and what are your thoughts? One to one midwifery care seems 
  further off sometimes, which is very, very sad...
  Best Regards,Kelly ZanteyCreator, 
  BellyBelly.com.au 
  Gentle 
  Solutions From Conception to ParenthoodBellyBelly Birth 
  Support - 
  http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support
  

THIS E-MAIL IS CONFIDENTIAL.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us by return e-mail and delete the document.  If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  Eastern Health is not liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication or for any delay in its receipt.