Re: Sharepoint 2010 Install Scripts
Jason, would you be keen to share the powershell scripts you've done? I have the farm setup working fine but I am having problems with the SSAs setup, specially Excel Calculation Services. Cheers, Edge On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Jason Taylor jason.tay...@gotosage.comwrote: I installed the binaries manually but tried to configure everything else via scripts. I used SPModule to create the farm which was very useful and worked fine. The only service I was not able to install using PowerScript was the User Profile Service. I tried using New-SPProfileServiceApplication but was getting errors. After some research on the web I found there is a known bug in the script that creates certain objects in the database with the incorrect owner which the service cannot access. I just ended up creating this manually. Another annoyance is that New-SPPerformancePointServiceApplication does not allow you to name the database. For all others you can setup more friendly names except PerformancePoint which will have a Guid in it. Cheers, Jason Taylor SAGE Automation *From:* ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] *On Behalf Of *Ajay *Sent:* Wednesday, 15 September 2010 3:31 PM *To:* ozMOSS *Subject:* Sharepoint 2010 Install Scripts Hi Guys, Do you have any links to powershell you have used or come across for 2010 farm install. I am also keen on having scripts which work on Sql Authentication set up. Thanks a SAGE is the first and only Australian company certified to the global benchmark standards of the Control Systems Integration Association. To see how this benefits you, simply visit www.controlsys.org -- Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Re: Site Collection Admin - use group
try this: - go to http://your site collection/_layouts/aclinv.aspxhttp://%3cyour%20site%20collection%3e/_layouts/aclinv.aspx - add the group - chose give permissions directly - select full control - click ok Edge www.superedge.net On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Paul Noone paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au wrote: CA and at the site collection level. It's a people picker field in both. Doesn't accept groups for some reason. -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Bill Williamson Sent: Tuesday, 22 September 2009 2:14 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Re: Site Collection Admin - use group Are you talking about in central admin? On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Paul Noone paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au wrote: Has anyone found a nifty way to hack the site collection admin people picker field so it’ll accept groups?? SharePoint Manager won’t let me edit these fields. L Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Re: Site Collection Admin - use group
Agreed that's not the same thing. Try and see if the solution works for you. because internally actually that page to add primary site collection is an override of that functionality from the page I sent ...you know, the story of the cat and the skinning thing... Cheers, -Edge On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Brian Farnhill br...@brianfarnhill.comwrote: That’s just the Full Control permission in the site collection, which isn’t the same as site collection admin As far as I know there isn’t a way to use any sort of group for this, which sucks – They have a SharePoint group in CA for Farm Administrators (and I’m pretty sure you can put AD groups in there) but for site collection admin you have to select only specific people without the use of groups, that’s a bit of a fail in my book Regards, *Brian Farnhill* Blog: http://blog.brianfarnhill.com | Twitter: @BrianFarnhillhttp://twitter.com/BrianFarnhill| Mobile: 0408 289 303 *From:* ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] *On Behalf Of *Edge *Sent:* Tuesday, 22 September 2009 2:29 PM *To:* ozmoss@ozmoss.com *Subject:* Re: Site Collection Admin - use group try this: - go to http://your site collection/_layouts/aclinv.aspxhttp://%3cyour%20site%20collection%3e/_layouts/aclinv.aspx - add the group - chose give permissions directly - select full control - click ok Edge www.superedge.net On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Paul Noone paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au wrote: CA and at the site collection level. It's a people picker field in both. Doesn't accept groups for some reason. -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Bill Williamson Sent: Tuesday, 22 September 2009 2:14 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Re: Site Collection Admin - use group Are you talking about in central admin? On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Paul Noone paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au wrote: Has anyone found a nifty way to hack the site collection admin people picker field so it’ll accept groups?? SharePoint Manager won’t let me edit these fields. L Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Re: new document requires a windows sharepoint services-compatible application
If you search bing.com, thats the first result you get: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/833714 I hope it helps / point you in the right direction -E *From:* ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] *On Behalf Of *Damian Worrad *Sent:* Thursday, 30 July 2009 7:13 PM *To:* ozmoss@ozmoss.com *Subject:* new document requires a windows sharepoint services-compatible application Has anyone had this error occur even though the error doesn't occur on other Sharepoint environments? Obviously I'm using the same client to browse to these sites. The Test and Production sites are fine but when trying to add a new document on the Pre Production environment the error displays! Any ideas anyone? All suggestions welcome. Cheers Damian Worrad -- Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists -- Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
Re: Upgrading solution for CT
JT, so you;re actually part of the list also? good to know. I sent an email to you about an issue with SPSource maybe you did not get it. I'll try here. When the CT definition is extracted and the type is person, the content type xml will complain that UserSelectionMode='peopleonly' it is wrong and it is expecting an integer. So we have to go manually and fix the xml to UserSelectionMode='0'. maybe you generating the code spitting out the Enum (PeopleOnly) instead of the value? -Edge www.superedge.net On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Jeremy Thake jeremy.th...@readify.netwrote: Thanks for compliments on SPSource it was @RichFinn as well. It is a great tool for reverse engineering Web UI changes. What I’ve found is exactly what you’ve stated...people use it to start with to reverse engineer code. But when they realise how simple it is to create them in XML hooked up into a Solution Package (WSPs rule!) they move away from Web UI as it’s “slower”. It’s just a great baby step into WSPs + XML schemas. Watch this space for VS2010 integration too ;-) Cheers, *Jeremy Thake* Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
Re: Upgrading solution for CT
that's a good article. I think I missed that during my swine-flu :) As a matter of fact I am about to perform a content type rollout in our SP farm, which have hundreds of sites.( not to mention the lists in them and mysites ). But I believe he missed some *very important* points when doing that sort of CT manipulation. In my tests you can get pretty scary results if things like: you try to change a content type that is associated with a list with checked out files, or a content type columns is being referenced in a page layuot and you change that column etc. so YES, some checks must be done before for real life setups. if you perform that sort of modification without the checks, you can kiss goodbye these files:) you can see but never will access them again ( which can upset people and yeah!!!... we are not in the bussiness of upsetting people unless you are a QLD Maroon talking to a NSW Blue:) ) anyway... he is right about using feature receiver (SPbuilder rocks). but we are actually using SPSource (that guy Jeremy Thake rocks) to generate the template then use the feature receiver to propagate the changes. As of now we are running in our test-environment but so soon we go for the real deal :) ( BANG! ) Cheers, -Edge On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Clayton James clayt...@flarepoint.com.auwrote: This has just been released this month on msdn. Great article on developing, deploying and updating Content Types. *Best Practices: Developing Content Types in SharePoint Server 2007 and Windows SharePoint Services 3.0* http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee330223.aspx *Clayton James* FlarePoint Pty Ltd |*t* +61 7 3821 7178 |*f* + 61 7 3821 7175 |*m* 0402 463 276 | *w* http://www.flarepoint.com.au * * Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
