Re: IIS Log Reader
Thanks for the kind words grant. If anyone has any feature requests other than 'less crashy' I'm all ears. I've made the cheque out to 'Grant Molloy' - I hope this is OK ;-) Joseph On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Grant Molloy wrote: > Thought I would share with this little gem of a product I found hiding in > my RSS feeds released by Joseph Cooney, author of LearnWpf.com.. > > > http://jcooney.net/post/2010/08/03/Announcing-my-latest-side-project-logEnvy-bringing-e28098sexye28099-to-windows-and-IIS-logs.aspx > > > ___ > ozsilverlight mailing list > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > ___ ozsilverlight mailing list ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
RE: Design time data
+1 to IsInDesignTool- HtmlPage.IsEnabled was the workaround from Silverlight 2
ages, it will generate false positives when running out of browser (and other
scenarios).
Pete
From: ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com
[mailto:ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com] On Behalf Of Peter Gfader
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 11:25 PM
To: ozSilverlight
Subject: Re: Design time data
+1 to
if (DesignerProperties.IsInDesignTool)
{
// create sample data for designer
}
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Miguel Madero
mailto:m...@miguelmadero.com>> wrote:
We have to be careful with HtmlPage.IsEnabled. That was the way to do it in
Silverlight 2, however this will break Out of Browser. Not a big issue if you
don't care about OOB, but just something to keep in mind.
Try DesignerProperties.IsInDesignTool. This should work for both VS and Blend.
@David, there are a couple more options
1. Create Sample Data from class option in Blend. To be honest I don't like it
and find it quite limited, but it's still an option.
2. Using a DesignTime ViewModel. Using a d:DataContext and set it to create an
instance of your type.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:32 PM, ross
mailto:r...@perenni.com.au>> wrote:
Hi David,
I've sent this directly to you, as you can't send attachments to the
list. I'm a bit short of time to write an essay, so just drummed up a
sample.
The sample isn't the only way to do it, but maybe will give you some ideas.
The key is the check for if (HtmlPage.IsEnabled), where the service
locator sets the mock data if false. When in blend,
HtmlPage.IsEnabled = false. Of course, you can do this where ever you
want in your code base. You don't necessarily have to use a service
locator, or set the datacontext in the same manner.
If you open the project in blend, you will see the data displayed is
all mock data. If you run it from VS you will see 'live' data. Of
course the live data is a fudge in this case but should give you the
idea.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Cheers.
Ross
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:23 PM, David Burela
mailto:david.bur...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Thought I'd check how others are displaying design time data. There are 2
> ways that I go about it
> 1.
> Just setting the design time datacontext to a sampledata.xaml file
>
>
> 2.
> Doing it similar to how Jordan shows in his presentations
> View
> ViewModel
> Repository (Runtime, DesignTime, etc)
> (RVVM)
>
> The first option is nice and quick and easy to do, but it doesn't help you
> unit test your ViewModel at all.
> The 2nd option is good, but as far as I know depends on your ViewModel
> loading the data in the constructor.
> I am at a client where they load the data up as a seperate call, not in the
> constructor. Any tips on how I could still use the repository pattern, but
> still be able to load the data without anything in the constructor. Doesn't
> seem possible to me.
> -David Burela
> ___
> ozsilverlight mailing list
> ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
>
>
___
ozsilverlight mailing list
ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
--
Miguel A. Madero Reyes
www.miguelmadero.com (blog)
m...@miguelmadero.com
___
ozsilverlight mailing list
ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
--
.peter.gfader.
http://blog.gfader.com/
http://twitter.com/peitor
___
ozsilverlight mailing list
ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
RE: IIS Log Reader
How many years in the making Joco? J From: ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com [mailto:ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com] On Behalf Of Joseph Cooney Sent: Wednesday, 18 August 2010 4:06 AM To: ozSilverlight Cc: ozDotNet Subject: Re: IIS Log Reader Thanks for the kind words grant. If anyone has any feature requests other than 'less crashy' I'm all ears. I've made the cheque out to 'Grant Molloy' - I hope this is OK ;-) Joseph On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Grant Molloy wrote: Thought I would share with this little gem of a product I found hiding in my RSS feeds released by Joseph Cooney, author of LearnWpf.com.. http://jcooney.net/post/2010/08/03/Announcing-my-latest-side-project-logEnvy -bringing-e28098sexye28099-to-windows-and-IIS-logs.aspx ___ ozsilverlight mailing list ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight ___ ozsilverlight mailing list ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
Re: IIS Log Reader
Its really great! It would be cool to save queries as custom queries and also some 'dynamic' queries with 'recent viewed', 'most popular', etcetera.. []s! Ratn On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:05 AM, Grant Molloy wrote: > Thought I would share with this little gem of a product I found hiding in > my RSS feeds released by Joseph Cooney, author of LearnWpf.com.. > > > http://jcooney.net/post/2010/08/03/Announcing-my-latest-side-project-logEnvy-bringing-e28098sexye28099-to-windows-and-IIS-logs.aspx > > > ___ > ozsilverlight mailing list > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > -- []s! Muito obrigado, Rodrigo Ratan ___ ozsilverlight mailing list ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
Re: IIS Log Reader
As long as it's a big one !!! On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Joseph Cooney wrote: > Thanks for the kind words grant. If anyone has any feature requests other > than 'less crashy' I'm all ears. > > I've made the cheque out to 'Grant Molloy' - I hope this is OK ;-) > Joseph > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Grant Molloy wrote: > >> Thought I would share with this little gem of a product I found hiding in >> my RSS feeds released by Joseph Cooney, author of LearnWpf.com.. >> >> >> http://jcooney.net/post/2010/08/03/Announcing-my-latest-side-project-logEnvy-bringing-e28098sexye28099-to-windows-and-IIS-logs.aspx >> >> >> ___ >> ozsilverlight mailing list >> ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com >> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight >> >> > > ___ > ozsilverlight mailing list > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > ___ ozsilverlight mailing list ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
Re: Design time data
This probably won't affect any of you, but just to add to this I found a
similar issue with a WPF Blend Add-in. IsInDesignTool was returning true at
runtime. Which sort of makes sense (but still wrong), since I was still
'inside of the design tool'. Anyway, I never bother debugging it and just
went with a SampleData ViewModel approach...
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Peter Blois wrote:
> +1 to IsInDesignTool- HtmlPage.IsEnabled was the workaround from
> Silverlight 2 ages, it will generate false positives when running out of
> browser (and other scenarios).
>
>
>
> Pete
>
>
>
> *From:* ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com [mailto:
> ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com] *On Behalf Of *Peter Gfader
> *Sent:* Monday, August 16, 2010 11:25 PM
> *To:* ozSilverlight
> *Subject:* Re: Design time data
>
>
>
> +1 to
>
> if (DesignerProperties.IsInDesignTool)
>
> {
>
> // create sample data for designer
>
> }
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Miguel Madero
> wrote:
>
> We have to be careful with HtmlPage.IsEnabled. That was the way to do it in
> Silverlight 2, however this will break Out of Browser. Not a big issue if
> you don't care about OOB, but just something to keep in mind.
>
>
>
> Try DesignerProperties.IsInDesignTool. This should work for both VS and
> Blend.
>
>
>
> @David, there are a couple more options
>
>
>
> 1. Create Sample Data from class option in Blend. To be honest I don't like
> it and find it quite limited, but it's still an option.
>
> 2. Using a DesignTime ViewModel. Using a d:DataContext and set it to create
> an instance of your type.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:32 PM, ross wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> I've sent this directly to you, as you can't send attachments to the
> list. I'm a bit short of time to write an essay, so just drummed up a
> sample.
>
> The sample isn't the only way to do it, but maybe will give you some ideas.
>
> The key is the check for if (HtmlPage.IsEnabled), where the service
> locator sets the mock data if false. When in blend,
> HtmlPage.IsEnabled = false. Of course, you can do this where ever you
> want in your code base. You don't necessarily have to use a service
> locator, or set the datacontext in the same manner.
>
> If you open the project in blend, you will see the data displayed is
> all mock data. If you run it from VS you will see 'live' data. Of
> course the live data is a fudge in this case but should give you the
> idea.
>
> Let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Ross
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:23 PM, David Burela
> wrote:
> > Thought I'd check how others are displaying design time data. There are 2
> > ways that I go about it
> > 1.
> > Just setting the design time datacontext to a sampledata.xaml file
> >
> >
> > 2.
> > Doing it similar to how Jordan shows in his presentations
> > View
> > ViewModel
> > Repository (Runtime, DesignTime, etc)
> > (RVVM)
> >
> > The first option is nice and quick and easy to do, but it doesn't help
> you
> > unit test your ViewModel at all.
> > The 2nd option is good, but as far as I know depends on your ViewModel
> > loading the data in the constructor.
> > I am at a client where they load the data up as a seperate call, not in
> the
> > constructor. Any tips on how I could still use the repository pattern,
> but
> > still be able to load the data without anything in the constructor.
> Doesn't
> > seem possible to me.
> > -David Burela
>
> > ___
> > ozsilverlight mailing list
> > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
> > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
> >
> >
>
>
> ___
> ozsilverlight mailing list
> ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
>
>
>
> --
> Miguel A. Madero Reyes
> www.miguelmadero.com (blog)
> m...@miguelmadero.com
>
>
> ___
> ozsilverlight mailing list
> ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> .peter.gfader.
>
> http://blog.gfader.com/
>
> http://twitter.com/peitor
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> ozsilverlight mailing list
> ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
>
>
--
Miguel A. Madero Reyes
www.miguelmadero.com (blog)
m...@miguelmadero.com
___
ozsilverlight mailing list
ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
