[Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-22 02:51:41 EST --- pki-selinux-1.3.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-selinux-1.3.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 DuvJones changed: What|Removed |Added CC||duvelle.jo...@gmail.com --- Comment #98 from DuvJones 2010-01-22 02:45:57 EST --- (In reply to comment #94) > 1.4.3 is on it's way to being released, so I'm going to wait for that. Given that it's been a few weeks, I was wondering if there was any update to 1.4.3? Or any activity to the request itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226556] Merge Review: xferstats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226556 --- Comment #1 from Jiri Skala 2010-01-22 02:33:21 EST --- rpmlint complaines of prereq usage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556988] Review Request: ibus-fbterm - IBus front-end for fbterm.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556988 --- Comment #6 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-22 01:37:13 EST --- Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-fbterm-0.9.1-3.fc12.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-fbterm.spec Description: IBus front-end for fbterm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556988] Review Request: ibus-fbterm - IBus front-end for fbterm.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556988
--- Comment #5 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-22 01:14:41 EST
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> 1. Any reason you limit the BuildArch to i586 and x86_64?
Just because "noarch" as value doesn't work.
> 2. ibus-fbterm-lanuch works with bash, but not tcsh,
>following patch can fix that.
>
> --- /usr/bin/ibus-fbterm-launch.orig 2010-01-22 12:39:58.822703153 +1000
> +++ /usr/bin/ibus-fbterm-launch 2010-01-22 14:25:26.286694006 +1000
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
> exit 1
> fi
>
> -eval `dbus-launch --auto-syntax`
> +eval `dbus-launch --sh-syntax`
>
> export DISPLAY=:9${TTY_NUM}.0
Will patch and resubmit.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556988] Review Request: ibus-fbterm - IBus front-end for fbterm.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556988
--- Comment #4 from Ding-Yi Chen 2010-01-22 00:17:17 EST ---
Two more questions:
1. Any reason you limit the BuildArch to i586 and x86_64?
2. ibus-fbterm-lanuch works with bash, but not tcsh,
following patch can fix that.
--- /usr/bin/ibus-fbterm-launch.orig 2010-01-22 12:39:58.822703153 +1000
+++ /usr/bin/ibus-fbterm-launch 2010-01-22 14:25:26.286694006 +1000
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
exit 1
fi
-eval `dbus-launch --auto-syntax`
+eval `dbus-launch --sh-syntax`
export DISPLAY=:9${TTY_NUM}.0
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557658] Review Request: aseqmm - C++/Qt4 wrapper around the ALSA library sequencer interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557658 Ryan Rix changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||r...@n.rix.si AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|r...@n.rix.si --- Comment #1 from Ryan Rix 2010-01-21 23:42:02 EST --- I'll take this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 513731] Review request: berry4all - Utilities to tether Blackberries to Linux. Includes pre-built settings for many major cellular carriers.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513731 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-21 23:37:20 EST --- I guess you could submit it yourself, then, but if the original submitter doesn't come back rather soon, I'll close this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557658] New: Review Request: aseqmm - C++/Qt4 wrapper around the ALSA library sequencer interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: aseqmm - C++/Qt4 wrapper around the ALSA library sequencer interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557658 Summary: Review Request: aseqmm - C++/Qt4 wrapper around the ALSA library sequencer interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f13/aseqmm.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f13/aseqmm-0.2.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: The aseqmm library is a C++ wrapper around the ALSA library sequencer interface, using Qt4 objects, idioms and style. The ALSA sequencer interface provides software support for MIDI technology on GNU/Linux. Additional information: This is a dependency of KMid2, which I'm packaging to replace the KMid snapshot currently in Fedora, which is unmaintained upstream. KMid2 has several new features and bugfixes. A kmid2 review request is forthcoming. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1937644 rpmlint output: aseqmm-devel.i686: W: no-documentation aseqmm-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation aseqmm-examples.i686: W: no-documentation aseqmm-examples.x86_64: W: no-documentation 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. These are harmless as the only relevant documentation (ChangeLog and COPYING) is already shipped in the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #60 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-21 22:51:54 EST --- Note that I haven't forgotten about this; I'm just trying to find the time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-21 20:24:54 EST --- pki-setup-1.3.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-setup-1.3.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-21 20:13:04 EST --- pki-setup-1.3.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-setup-1.3.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553852] Review Request: pki-tps - The Dogtag PKI System Token Processing System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553852 Kevin Wright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||panem...@gmail.com Summary|Review Request: pki-tps - |Review Request: pki-tps - |Dogtag Certificate System |The Dogtag PKI System Token |Token Processing System |Processing System Status Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #1 from Kevin Wright 2010-01-21 19:59:05 EST --- Description: The Dogtag PKI System Token Processing System Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-tps/pki-tps.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-tps/pki-tps-1.3.0-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557632] New: Re-Review Request: pki-symkey - rename from symkey
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Re-Review Request: pki-symkey - rename from symkey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557632 Summary: Re-Review Request: pki-symkey - rename from symkey Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: NotReady Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panem...@gmail.com ReportedBy: kwri...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, c...@redhat.com, jma...@redhat.com, a...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com, aw...@redhat.com, kwri...@redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is a simple renaming of a package from symkey to pki-symkey. The original bug for symkey is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Description: The Dogtag PKI Symmetric Key Java Native Interface (JNI) package supplies various native symmetric key operations to Java programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553850] Review Request: pki-ra - The Dogtag PKI Registration Authority
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553850 Kevin Wright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||panem...@gmail.com Summary|Review Request: pki-ra -|Review Request: pki-ra - |Dogtag Registration |The Dogtag PKI Registration |Authority |Authority Status Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #1 from Kevin Wright 2010-01-21 19:16:22 EST --- Description: The Dogtag PKI Registration Authority Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-ra/pki-ra.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-ra/pki-ra-1.3.0-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543159] Review Request: zeitgeist - Framework providing Desktop activity awareness
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543159 --- Comment #6 from Deji Akingunola 2010-01-21 18:59:42 EST --- Update to new release with some packaging fixes; Spec URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/zeitgeist.spec SRPM URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/zeitgeist-0.3.2-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-21 18:32:36 EST --- pki-java-tools-1.3.0-4.el5.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.3.0-4.fc12|1.3.0-4.el5.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553851] Review Request: dogtag-pki-tps-ui - The Dogtag Token Processing System User Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553851 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-21 18:30:39 EST --- dogtag-pki-tps-ui-1.3.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dogtag-pki-tps-ui'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2010-0110 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-21 18:30:10 EST --- cciss_vol_status-1.06-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.3.1-1.fc12|1.3.1-1.el5.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.06-2.fc12 |1.06-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-21 18:30:25 EST --- osutil-1.3.1-1.el5.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529278] Review Request: eclipse-ptp - Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529278 --- Comment #9 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-21 18:20:00 EST --- http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/eclipse-ptp-3.0.1-0.2.v201001152110.fc12.src.rpm http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/eclipse-ptp.spec * Thu Jan 21 2010 Orion Poplawski - 3.0.1-0.2.v201001152110 - Make photran versions 5.0.1, rephraserengine 1.0.1 So that should take care of the version issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #40 from Daniel Walsh 2010-01-21 16:52:29 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: system-config-selinux Short Description: system-config-selinux is a utility for managing the SELinux environment Owners: dwalsh mgrepl Branches: devel InitialCC: cpardy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #75 from Nathanael Noblet 2010-01-21 15:46:25 EST --- * Thu Jan 21 2010 Nathanael Noblet - 3.9.0-2 - Replaced last etc with _sysconfdir macro - Use single integer release version - Fixed dspam-web.conf to actually work by default when installed. - Updated configure.pl to point to the proper directory - Placed the relevant README's in both -libs and the main package as they are relevant for both http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 Lorenzo Villani changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_DEV Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Lorenzo Villani 2010-01-21 15:43:57 EST --- I will make an exception for the license tag (change confirmed in hashed-map-0.4.5). +1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #39 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-21 15:32:18 EST --- "chris.pardy" is not a valid Fedora account; cannot add it as a commaintainer. If you meant cpardy, that account is not sponsored and cannot own or comaintain packages. "mgr...@redhat.com" is not a valid Fedora account. I assume you meant "mgrepl". F-13 is not a valid branch; early branching for F-13 has not yet begun. This whole thing has been highly irregular; generally the person who submits the package should be the one who requests CVS and should be the primary owner. Barring you opening your own review ticket for a proper review, could we at least see the final package with the corrections from comment 31 posted somewhere? And could you submit a corrected CVS request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556128] Review Request: ff-utils - Utilities to test force feedback of input device
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556128 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-21 15:24:34 EST --- Yes, it is a very good idea to become involved in the whole review process and help each other out. You probably don't want to actually build packages directly on your system however. Either install mock and use that to build locally, or do scratch builds in the Fedora buildsystem (koji). Anyone with a Fedora account can use the buildsystem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529181] Review Request: nautilus-flickr-uploader - Simple GUI to upload pics to Flickr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529181
Chris Tyler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ch...@tylers.info
--- Comment #4 from Chris Tyler 2010-01-21 14:59:01 EST ---
Informal review (non-sponsor) results:
Must:
N* MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted
in the review.[1]
---> Not included in review (but checks out OK)
Y* MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines .
Y* MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
Y* MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
Y* MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
meet the Licensing Guidelines .
Y* MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license. [3]
Y* MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4]
Y* MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
Y* MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
Y* MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
Y* MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms
on at least one primary architecture. [7]
?* MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8]
---> Did not check
Y* MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
NA * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using
the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9]
NA * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10]
Y* MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11]
NA * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker. [12]
Y* MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory. [13]
Y* MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. [14]
Y* MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be
set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include
a %defattr(...) line. [15]
Y* MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16]
N* MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17]
---> Inconsistent use of $ and %
---> Consider using the %{name} macro in the %{bindir}/... line in %files
Y* MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18]
NA * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19]
NA * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must
run properly if it is not present. [19]
NA * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20]
NA * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21]
NA* MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires:
pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22]
NA * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package. [20]
NA * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency:
[Bug 555161] Review Request: csisat - Tool for LA+EUF Interpolation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555161 Bug 555161 depends on bug 555160, which changed state. Bug 555160 Summary: Review Request: picosat - A SAT solver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555160 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-21 14:45:55 EST --- csisat-1.2-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/csisat-1.2-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555161] Review Request: csisat - Tool for LA+EUF Interpolation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555161 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-21 14:46:01 EST --- csisat-1.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/csisat-1.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557546] New: Review Request: telepathy-sunshine - Gadu-Gadu connection manager for telepathy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-sunshine - Gadu-Gadu connection manager for telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557546 Summary: Review Request: telepathy-sunshine - Gadu-Gadu connection manager for telepathy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: beleg...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/telepathy-sunshine/telepathy-sunshine.spec SRPM URL: http://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/telepathy-sunshine/telepathy-sunshine-0.1.5-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Telepathy-sunshine is a Gadu-Gadu network connection manager. It supports the GG8 aka Nowe Gadu Gadu features such as UTF-8 encoding and new statuses. Package builds fine in mock (F12/x86_64). rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556128] Review Request: ff-utils - Utilities to test force feedback of input device
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556128 timlank changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timl...@timlank.com --- Comment #3 from timlank 2010-01-21 13:55:04 EST --- I'm trying to get sponsored for the first time also... from the reading, I think I need to make sure I try to help out others by doing some reviewing of my own I've been looking at yours and I was wondering if the SDL-devel package among potentially many others are required in the %BuildRequires area of the .spec. I tried to build this on a bare bones f12 system and ended up needing to install about 40 rpms before getting the SDL & SDL-devel package to install -and then I could successfully build ff-utils. I can provide the list if it helps. Thanks, Tim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473
--- Comment #22 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
2010-01-21 13:51:09 EST ---
lessfs.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 19, tab: line 1)
lessfs.i586: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/lessfs
1)
lessfs.i586: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/sbin/listdb
lessfs.i586: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/sbin/mklessfs
lessfs.i586: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/sbin/defrag_lessfs
lessfs.i586: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/sbin/lessfsck
lessfs.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/lessfs-1.0.0/authors
lessfs.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/lessfs-1.0.0/README.crypto
lessfs.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/lessfs-1.0.0/copying
2)
Still used direct path in several places:
# install SYSV init stuff
mkdir -p %{buildroot}/etc/rc.d/init.d
install -m755 etc/lessfs %{buildroot}/etc/rc.d/init.d/lessfs
install -D -m 644 etc/lessfs.cfg %{buildroot}/etc/lessfs.cfg
3)
lib_qlz.{c,h} still in tarball. I saw BR lzo-devel and --with-lzo configure
parameter, and if you aree shure it is not used anymore it should be deleted in
%prep.
4)
lib_BMW.c, lib_sboxes.c, lib_net.{h,c}, lib_tiger.c, listdb.c became part of
lessfs and not really libraries? It is clarified by upstream author?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529278] Review Request: eclipse-ptp - Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529278 --- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-21 13:40:44 EST --- * Thu Jan 21 2010 Orion Poplawski - 3.0.1-0.1.v201001152110 - Update to 3.0.1 snapshot - Split package - Make noarch http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/eclipse-ptp-3.0.1-0.1.v201001152110.fc12.src.rpm - The primary development location for libaif is here in ptp. - The devel-file/non-exec I would ignore. Some PTP packages ship the sources for code that is then compiled on the end user's machine. - The other OS/archs stuff consists of a small shell script used to build the shipped sources on the installed machine. I could patch them out but it doesn't seem worth it. Still need to handle replacing the existing photran packages (they now have a lower version number). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551940] Review Request: php-symfony-YAML - The Symfony YAML Component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551940 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-21 13:31:06 EST --- php-symfony-YAML-1.0.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony-YAML-1.0.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551940] Review Request: php-symfony-YAML - The Symfony YAML Component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551940 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-21 13:30:36 EST --- php-symfony-YAML-1.0.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-symfony-YAML-1.0.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557366] Review Request: Google-Go - A new systems programming language from Google
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557366 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: Google-Go - |- | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #38 from Daniel Walsh 2010-01-21 13:01:03 EST --- Jason, I want this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 Daniel Walsh changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #37 from Daniel Walsh 2010-01-21 12:58:30 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: system-config-selinux Short Description: system-config-selinux is a utility for managing the SELinux environment Owners: dwalsh chris.pardy Branches: F-13 InitialCC: mgr...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 Daniel Walsh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rra...@redhat.com --- Comment #36 from Daniel Walsh 2010-01-21 12:53:49 EST --- *** Bug 504809 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 504809] Review Request: system-config-selinux - SELinux configuration GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504809 Daniel Walsh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||dwa...@redhat.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Daniel Walsh 2010-01-21 12:53:49 EST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 508922 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 544531] Review Request: xvkbd - Virtual Keyboard for X Window System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544531 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(zbe64...@gmail.co ||m) --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-21 12:24:13 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-21 12:23:08 EST --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(mba...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-21 12:21:56 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530193] Review Request: rubygem-calendar_date_select - A popular date picker widget for ruby on rails and prototype.js
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530193 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-21 12:21:35 EST --- Please submit push requests on bodhi after builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530193] Review Request: rubygem-calendar_date_select - A popular date picker widget for ruby on rails and prototype.js
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530193 Bug 530193 depends on bug 552972, which changed state. Bug 552972 Summary: actionpack 2.3.4 broken with rack 1.1.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552972 What|Old Value |New Value Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 Bug 543549 depends on bug 552972, which changed state. Bug 552972 Summary: actionpack 2.3.4 broken with rack 1.1.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552972 What|Old Value |New Value Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587
--- Comment #74 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-21
12:15:59 EST ---
For -1.3:
* Release number
- By the way why do you use "1.3" for release number?
For formally released tarball, release number in the spec
file should be "X%{?dist}" where X is an integer.
* Macros
- Again please use %{_sysconfdir} instead of /etc .
Except for that, this package looks good to me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225768] Merge Review: foomatic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225768 --- Comment #3 from Tim Waugh 2010-01-21 11:39:22 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) > - prereq-use fileutils initscripts Fixed in foomatic-4.0.3-10.fc13. > - hardcoded-library-path Yes, this is intentional, as the comments indicate: export LIB_CUPS=/usr/lib/cups # /usr/lib NOT libdir export CUPS_BACKENDS=/usr/lib/cups/backend # /usr/lib NOT libdir export CUPS_FILTERS=/usr/lib/cups/filter# /usr/lib NOT libdir CUPS filters and backends are located in /usr/lib/cups/filters and /usr/lib/cups/backends even on x86_64 platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553717] Review Request: libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553717 Bastien Nocera changed: What|Removed |Added CC||o...@redhat.com --- Comment #15 from Bastien Nocera 2010-01-21 11:01:13 EST --- Benjamin would have more of an idea about what the problem is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226382] Merge Review: rusers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226382 Jiri Skala changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmosk...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jiri Skala 2010-01-21 10:59:06 EST --- There are rpmlint erros to fix: - prereq-use /sbin/chkconfig - use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR - initscripts marked as a config - summary ended by '.' - not appropriate buildroot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226384] Merge Review: rwho
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226384 Jiri Skala changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmosk...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jiri Skala 2010-01-21 11:26:39 EST --- rpmlint is not silent: - use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR - summary ended with dot - executable-marked-as-config-file (initscript) - buildroot is not appropriate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226382] Merge Review: rusers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226382 --- Comment #2 from Jiri Moskovcak 2010-01-21 11:24:46 EST --- fixed in rawhide - rusers-0.17-57 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553717] Review Request: libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553717 --- Comment #14 from Jarod Wilson 2010-01-21 10:46:07 EST --- No love, same errors as comment #10 with the following on the box: $ rpm -qa gstreamer-plugins\* gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.13-1.fc12.x86_64 gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.17-4.fc12.x86_64 gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.x86_64 gstreamer-plugins-base-devel-0.10.25.1-2.fc12.x86_64 gstreamer-plugins-flumpegdemux-0.10.15-8.fc12.x86_64 gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.25.1-2.fc12.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551258] Review Request: libgcal - A library to access google calendar events and contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551258
--- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane 2010-01-21 10:43:14
EST ---
Mario, you can drop the %{?dist} macro from changelog entries.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553717] Review Request: libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553717 --- Comment #13 from Bastien Nocera 2010-01-21 10:33:22 EST --- First, update to gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.17-4 (will fix some problems with complicated pipelines). I would also advise to install the non-free plugins (-bad, -ugly) and try again. The pipeline didn't link properly, most likely because of missing elements for conversion between types. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225768] Merge Review: foomatic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225768 --- Comment #2 from Jiri Skala 2010-01-21 10:35:49 EST --- There are rpmlint errors to fix: - prereq-use fileutils initscripts - hardcoded-library-path -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551258] Review Request: libgcal - A library to access google calendar events and contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551258
--- Comment #4 from Mario Ceresa 2010-01-21 10:22:56 EST
---
Hello Scott, Andrea and Michael,
I'm very sorry to reply only now, but I've been out for work and had so little
time to focus on the review:
@Andrea: thanks a lot for pointing me to the right source!
@Michael: thanks for the comments:
> The base shared library still belongs into "System Environment/Libraries".
> You can put multiple files behind a single %doc.
> File "INSTALL" is irrelevant to RPM package users.
Fixed. Install added as a doc for development subpackage.
> Caution! Avoid '#comments' after scriptlet sections. They would be included as
> scriptlet bodies, which breaks -p /sbin/ldconfig for example.
Thanks! This one was trubling me for a while but I'd never thought the comments
were the problem :)
> This description would benefit from some cleanup. Please make this a complete
> sentence in English.
Oops! I must have missed how ugly the previous sentence was. Hope now it's a
bit better
> Have you looked into enabling the built-in test-suite and creating a proper
%check section for it?
Yes, but I had some problems so thought to overlook. If it is really important
I could give it another shot...
> The -devel packages depends on libxml and libcurl headers, so adding
>"Requires: libxml2-devel libcurl-devel" would be necessary for all targets that
>don't add automatic pkgconfig dependencies (Fedora 10 and older, EPEL 5 and
>older).
> If you want to rely on the automatic pkgconfig dependencies, you can drop the
> "Requires: pkgconfig".
I don't understand this: when is that I have to manually specify Requires and
when it's better to let them be picked up by rpm?
> The header files in libgcal-devel bear a huge risk of causing file conflicts.
> This is a blocker IMO. This library ought to install them into a libgcal
> sub-directory:
Ok I added two lines that solve the problems in the INSTALL section:
mkdir -p %{buildroot}/usr/include/libgcal
mv %{buildroot}/usr/include/*.h %{buildroot}/usr/include/libgcal/
but I'm not sure this is the best way to do it.
New files are:
http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/libgcal.spec
http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/libgcal-0.9.3-2.fc12.src.rpm
Mario
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551274] Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274 --- Comment #5 from Mario Ceresa 2010-01-21 10:25:51 EST --- @Peter, Rex thanks a lot for explaining and fixing the Blocks/Depends! @Scott, thanks for your comment, I'll check and fix it soon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553717] Review Request: libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553717 --- Comment #12 from Jarod Wilson 2010-01-21 10:19:52 EST --- Nb: I've managed to scrape together a xine-lib-1.2 development tip build, and on top of that, built the xine crystalhd decoder plugin that is under development (can be found at http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/archvdr/browser/branches/libcrystalhd ). Its not exactly perfect yet, but it does play back a sample clip I've got using the crystalhd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557169] Review Request: bristol - Synthesizer emulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557169 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2010-01-21 10:10:19 EST --- Thanks, I made the configure, rpath and make changes. I'm really not sure *what* to do with the libs, they're a run-time dependancy of the binaries and I'm not sure that anyone else will us them. Does it make sense to have foo and foo-devel when they foo requires foo-devel? Odd, how did you get it to crash? The only trouble I have is if something else is creating a sound at that time and it can't open the sound device. Otherwise I can startBristol -mini, for example, and play my little heart out. :) I'm torn on the .desktop file issue. It'd be great to have one, maybe for -mini, but do startBristol -h and have a look at how many there are. I'm not doing 20+ .desktop files. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/bristol/bristol.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/bristol/bristol-0.40.7-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540986] Review Request: logback - A Java logging library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540986 Bug 540986 depends on bug 543480, which changed state. Bug 543480 Summary: Review Request: javamail - Java Mail API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543480 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA Bug 540986 depends on bug 543092, which changed state. Bug 543092 Summary: Please add Maven depmap fragments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543092 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-21 09:58:31 EST --- logback-0.9.18-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/logback-0.9.18-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 547993] Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(oget.fed...@gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #14 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2010-01-21 08:45:30 EST --- Hi Mamoru, Sorry I was away for about a month (I was in the away list in the wiki though). I will get back to this soon, possibly this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 462932] Review Request: echomine-muse - Java API for XMPP/Jabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462932 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura 2010-01-21 08:33:37 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) > This package depends on the xmlpull-api package which is also under review. I > have added the bug number for that review as a dependency to reflect this. This bug was closed, because John did not response anymore. Same here... -> NOTABUG (blcking FE-DEADREVIEW doesn't make sense, because upstreams, seems to be dead too.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557393] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src - Haskell source-code manipulation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557393 Rakesh Pandit changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2010-01-21 06:13:11 EST --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1936019 fails to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532190] Review Request: perl-Text-MultiMarkdown - Convert MultiMarkdown syntax to (X)HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532190 --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-21 05:52:43 EST --- Iain, oh, please accept my apologies. I confused this with perl-Text-Markdown. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557390] Review Request: ghc-stm - Haskell Software Transactional Memory library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557390 Rakesh Pandit changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rpan...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557391] Review Request: ghc-QuickCheck - Automatic testing of Haskell programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557391 Rakesh Pandit changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rpan...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557393] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src - Haskell source-code manipulation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557393 Rakesh Pandit changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rpan...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557392] Review Request: ghc-parallel - Haskell parallel programming library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557392 Rakesh Pandit changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rpan...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557393] New: Review Request: ghc-haskell-src - Haskell source-code manipulation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-haskell-src - Haskell source-code manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557393 Summary: Review Request: ghc-haskell-src - Haskell source-code manipulation library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-haskell-src/ghc-haskell-src.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-haskell-src/ghc-haskell-src-1.0.1.3-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: Haskell source-code manipulation library Facilities for manipulating Haskell source code:\ an abstract syntax, lexer, parser and pretty-printer. Part of haskell-platform -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557392] New: Review Request: ghc-parallel - Haskell parallel programming library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-parallel - Haskell parallel programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557392 Summary: Review Request: ghc-parallel - Haskell parallel programming library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-parallel/ghc-parallel.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-parallel/ghc-parallel-1.1.0.1-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: Haskell parallel programming library Part of haskell-platform -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557393] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src - Haskell source-code manipulation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557393 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-haskell-l...@redhat. ||com Blocks||555443 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557392] Review Request: ghc-parallel - Haskell parallel programming library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557392 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-haskell-l...@redhat. ||com Blocks||555443 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557391] New: Review Request: ghc-QuickCheck - Automatic testing of Haskell programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-QuickCheck - Automatic testing of Haskell programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557391 Summary: Review Request: ghc-QuickCheck - Automatic testing of Haskell programs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-QuickCheck/ghc-QuickCheck.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-QuickCheck/ghc-QuickCheck-2.1.0.2-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: Automatic testing of Haskell programs Part of haskell-platform. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557391] Review Request: ghc-QuickCheck - Automatic testing of Haskell programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557391 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-haskell-l...@redhat. ||com Blocks||555443 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 526928] Review Request: blokkal - A KDE blogging client that supports multiple protocols and sites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526928 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-21 05:10:56 EST --- blokkal-0.1.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/blokkal-0.1.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 526928] Review Request: blokkal - A KDE blogging client that supports multiple protocols and sites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526928 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-21 05:10:50 EST --- blokkal-0.1.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/blokkal-0.1.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557390] New: Review Request: ghc-stm - Haskell Software Transactional Memory library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-stm - Haskell Software Transactional Memory library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557390 Summary: Review Request: ghc-stm - Haskell Software Transactional Memory library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-stm/ghc-stm.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-stm/ghc-stm-2.1.1.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Haskell Software Transactional Memory library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557390] Review Request: ghc-stm - Haskell Software Transactional Memory library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557390 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-haskell-l...@redhat. ||com Blocks||555443 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2010-01-21 05:07:54 EST --- This is part of haskell-platform. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556216] Review Request: bangarang - A media player for the KDE SC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556216 --- Comment #3 from leigh scott 2010-01-21 04:48:10 EST --- Your desktop file has a error in it, I reported the issue here. http://code.google.com/p/bangarangissuetracking/issues/detail?id=72 And they have now fixed it http://gitorious.org/bangarang/bangarang/merge_requests/29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2010-01-21 04:30:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #8) > > (Correctly he hasn't updated the original header file yet IIUC, but > > anyway.) > > So in that sense we could actually ignore GPL. Meant to add he has actually made that change in hashed-map-0.4.5 which will be required by darcs-2.4.0 anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2010-01-21 04:29:24 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) > (Correctly he hasn't updated the original header file yet IIUC, but anyway.) > So in that sense we could actually ignore GPL. (In reply to comment #9) > I think that makes it GPL AND BSD (whereas dual-licensed would be GPL OR BSD). You're right about dual-licenseing being "OR", but AFAIK "AND" means part of the binary package is one license and another part another (cf cpphs). In this case it is a single library linked together and hence GPL trumphs BSD. However going on the above comment from the author I think we could just forget about the "GPL code" - I could add a comment to that effect in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553683] Review Request: luckybackup - A powerful, fast and reliable backup and sync tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553683 Thomas Janssen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Thomas Janssen 2010-01-21 04:11:20 EST --- Yeah, the long buildtime is due to a cc1plus weirdness/bug in F-12 and -rawhide. Hope it get fixed soon. Thanks for the review nirik :) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: luckybackup Short Description: A powerful, fast and reliable backup and sync tool Owners: thomasj Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 Conrad Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kon...@tylerc.org --- Comment #9 from Conrad Meyer 2010-01-21 03:53:24 EST --- I think that makes it GPL AND BSD (whereas dual-licensed would be GPL OR BSD). But I could be wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532190] Review Request: perl-Text-MultiMarkdown - Convert MultiMarkdown syntax to (X)HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532190 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532190] Review Request: perl-Text-MultiMarkdown - Convert MultiMarkdown syntax to (X)HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532190 --- Comment #10 from Iain Arnell 2010-01-21 03:38:32 EST --- Oh no I didn't! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2010-01-21 03:38:51 EST --- To clarify again, I think "GPL+" is correct for now. GPL plus BSD = GPL: the library is not dual-licensed so GPL+ is the correct license AFAICT. (In reply to comment #7) > You're right SHA256.hsc is marked GPL. I actually talked > to the author about this and he remarked that he had rewritten > the file recently but that does not affect this review... (Correctly he hasn't updated the original header file yet IIUC, but anyway.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542313] Review Request: QTeXEngine - Library enabling Qt based applications to easily export graphics to TeX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542313 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(supercy...@163.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Chen Lei 2010-01-21 03:26:53 EST --- Thankee Rex. I fixed all the problems above except renaming pacakge to lower case, since the libname is libQTeXEngine.so.1 rather than libqtexengine.so.1. SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/QTeXEngine.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/QTeXEngine-0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542313] Review Request: QTeXEngine - Library enabling Qt based applications to easily export graphics to TeX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542313 --- Comment #4 from Chen Lei 2010-01-21 03:30:23 EST --- My FAS name is supercyper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532190] Review Request: perl-Text-MultiMarkdown - Convert MultiMarkdown syntax to (X)HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532190 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lkund...@v3.sk Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-21 03:17:37 EST --- (Fedora Maintainer agreed via e-mail) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Text-MultiMarkdown Short Description: Convert MultiMarkdown syntax to (X)HTML Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557366] Review Request: -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557366 Alex Combas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
