[Bug 560894] Review Request: perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod - Allow a module's pod to contain Pod::Coverage hints
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560894 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2010-02-09 03:30:16 EST --- Sorry 'bout that - new spec and srpm are now definitely uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550369] Review Request: spill - A segregated package install logical linker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550369 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-02-09 04:43:13 EST --- Thanks for the review. I will switch to %makeinstall. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550369] Review Request: spill - A segregated package install logical linker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550369 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-02-09 04:44:04 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: spill Short Description: A segregated package install logical linker Owners: fab Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 548795] Review Request: belier - Generates scripts allowing you to chain many ssh connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548795 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(fab...@bernewirel | |ess.net)| --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-02-09 04:52:27 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) Any news here? Is the package ok, any new comment/review or anything? Now is a complete review needed. Fabian Affolter, what did you meant with - Your package provides an egg. Please have a look at the following page 'BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel' needs to be replaced with 'BuildRequires: python-setuptools' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562158] Review Request: dfish (a generic front-end for selecting files)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562158 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Novotny dnovo...@redhat.com 2010-02-09 05:15:28 EST --- thanks Kevin, built in rawhide (dfish-1.3-1.fc13) and F12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562158] Review Request: dfish (a generic front-end for selecting files)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562158 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09 05:16:34 EST --- dfish-1.3-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dfish-1.3-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 483859] Review Request: libg3d - Library for 3D file/object viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483859 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-02-09 05:24:40 EST --- I'm still looking for a review of this package because it blocks G3DViewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562847] Review Request: bfa-firmware - Brocade Fibre Channel HBA Firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562847 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-02-09 05:34:18 EST --- I'll review this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561534] Review Request: ar9170-firmware - Firmware for Atheros AR9170 wireless network adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561534 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-02-09 05:33:55 EST --- I'll review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523715] Review Request: logiweb - a system for electronic distribution of mathematics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523715 --- Comment #18 from Klaus Grue g...@diku.dk 2010-02-09 05:42:31 EST --- Version 0.2.8 is out. The new version is here: Spec URL: http://logiweb.eu/1.0/doc/download/logiweb.spec SRPM URL: http://logiweb.eu/1.0/doc/download/logiweb-0.2.8-1.fc11.src.rpm HTML URL: http://logiweb.eu/1.0/doc/download/rpm.html Mirror: http://logiweb.imm.dtu.dk/1.0/doc/download/rpm.html Mirror: http://topps.diku.dk/logiweb/1.0/doc/download/rpm.html Now the build process survives redirection of stdout. Hopefully, that prevents this build failure: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=190 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562585] Review Request: ccd2iso - CloneCD image to ISO image file converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562585 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09 06:59:50 EST --- e.g. for hosting space: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561534] Review Request: ar9170-firmware - Firmware for Atheros AR9170 wireless network adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561534 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-02-09 07:21:47 EST --- BTW are there any particular reasons not to package ver. 2010-02-03 ? ( )http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mcgrof/firmware/ar9170/2010-02-03/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562847] Review Request: bfa-firmware - Brocade Fibre Channel HBA Firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562847 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-02-09 07:21:23 EST --- Oops! Please, ignore my comment about ar9170 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562847] Review Request: bfa-firmware - Brocade Fibre Channel HBA Firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562847
--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-02-09 07:19:10 EST
---
REVIEW:
+ rpmlint is silent
[pe...@sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint
../RPMS/noarch/bfa-firmware-2.1.2.1-1.fc12.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[pe...@sulaco SPECS]$
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
- The package DOES NOT meet the Packaging Guidelines - one missing Requires:
udev (owner of /lib/firmware). Other things looks sane.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
05751f5b37c2a833533878b6ed20b4b97b2292a276e7e4e3cf563c295a6a8c38 cbfw.bin
67278ade27b661c8434460720cc72dfb99201a1ccd13e3532ff697fee79f1d0b ctfw.bin
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
0 No shared library files.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
+ The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
0 No header files.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1).
0 No devel sub-package.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
So, please, add the only missing Requires, and I'll continue.
BTW are there any particular reasons not to package ver. 2010-02-03 ? (
)http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mcgrof/firmware/ar9170/2010-02-03/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 526682] Review Request: django-debug-toolbar - Django debug information about the current request/response
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526682 Matthias Runge mru...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mru...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge mru...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09 07:33:09 EST --- Allison, are you still working on this? rpmlint on your spec-file looks fine to me. Your SRPM-URL changed slightly, right? http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-debug-toolbar/django-debug-toolbar-0.8.1-1.fc12.src.rpm rpmlint looks ok, mock build looks ok, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Runge mru...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09 07:38:44 EST --- Thank you for your reply. I just did an unofficial review on django-debug-toolbar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526682 I took one or another look esp. on spec-files of other packages, without anouncing it in bugzilla. If it's required, I'll do some more and review unofficially some packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532590] Review Request: yaws - Web server for dynamic content written in Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532590 --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-02-09 07:46:24 EST --- Oh, I almost forgot about my promise to provide a patch (very simple one, actually). Here it is: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/yaws--Use-system-wide-erlsom-header.patch The only stopper remaining is the absence of egssapi in Fedora. Actually, I'm not sure, that egssapi really needed for normal operation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563176] New: Review Request: buildsys-macros - buildsys macros needed to build EPEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: buildsys-macros - buildsys macros needed to build EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563176 Summary: Review Request: buildsys-macros - buildsys macros needed to build EPEL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensou...@till.name QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/buildsys-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/buildsys-macros-5-6.el5.src.rpm Description: Buildsys macros needed to build EPEL packages. Currently the package is located at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/rhel5/i386/ which is an unsigned repository. This package is EPEL-5 only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563177] New: Review Request: perl-Net-STOMP - STOMP object oriented module for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-STOMP - STOMP object oriented module for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563177 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-STOMP - STOMP object oriented module for Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.tray...@cern.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP/perl-Net-STOMP.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP/perl-Net-STOMP-0.6-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module provides an object oriented client interface to interact with servers supporting STOMP (Streaming Text Orientated Messaging Protocol). It supports the major features of messaging brokers: SSL, asynchronous I/O, receipts and transactions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562330] Review Request: libnih - Lightweight application development library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562330
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2010-02-09 09:01:23
EST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
rpmlint reports:
libnih.spec:63: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/pkgconfig/*
This one is OK as long as the pkgconfig file is arch independent.
But it's ok, it just hits this part of spec file:
That's right. But IMHO it would be nicer to use a configure flag or patch to
avoid using that kind of conditionals..
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518857] Review Request: django-extensions - django command line extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518857
Matthias Runge mru...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mru...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge mru...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09
09:18:59 EST ---
Since I'm not approved yet, I'm not able to sponsor you, nor to do a real
review.
* mock builds fine.
* rpmlint django-extensions-0.4.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
django-extensions.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
You should append the version (0.4.1-1) to the %changelog -line:
* Sun Aug 23 2009 Luca Botti lucabo...@fedoraproject.org 0.4.1-1
Looking deeper in your SPEC-File, source0 should contain a full URL. You should
list it as:
source0:
http://django-command-extensions.googlecode.com/files/%{name}-${version}.tar.gz
Does source1 (django-extensions-doc) really exist? I couldn't find it at URL
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561534] Review Request: ar9170-firmware - Firmware for Atheros AR9170 wireless network adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561534 --- Comment #4 from John W. Linville linvi...@redhat.com 2010-02-09 09:29:23 EST --- Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/ar9170-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/ar9170-firmware-2009.05.28-2.fc11.src.rpm Doh! Missed the Requires for udev -- that's what I get for copying an old spec file from another firmware package rather than taking the current version of that spec from CVS. :-) The 2010-02-03 firmware version was published for comments and is really more of a beta release at this point. I imagine it will be picked-up as an update, but just in case there is a problem I figured I'd get the package started with the stable version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561534] Review Request: ar9170-firmware - Firmware for Atheros AR9170 wireless network adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561534 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-02-09 09:39:24 EST --- Ok, understood. I don't see any other issues, and this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561534] Review Request: ar9170-firmware - Firmware for Atheros AR9170 wireless network adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561534 John W. Linville linvi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from John W. Linville linvi...@redhat.com 2010-02-09 09:56:00 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ar9170-firmware Short Description: Firmware for Atheros AR9170 wireless network adapters Owners: linville Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: linville -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #22 from Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2010-02-09 10:43:18 EST --- Hey, I can help out w/ reviewing / submitting this package but can we update it to the most recent version 2.2.19 http://gemcutter.org/gems/haml I ask because apparently there are new haml dependencies which are not reflected in the current rpm spec, and are needed by haml for features needed in other software. Specifically the yard and markuku (which in return depends on syntax) gem dependencies have been added https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562997 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562993 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504470 Haml = 2,2,19 is needed for the latest release of compass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563000 If you need any assistance shout our or check my spec (in the closed / duplicate bug) where I have all the deps and build setup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561470] Review Request: beakerlib - shell-level integration testing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561470 --- Comment #9 from Petr Muller pmul...@redhat.com 2010-02-09 11:27:06 EST --- Thanks you for all the feedback! I'll fix everything and let know... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556433] Review Request: rubygem-eventmachine - Ruby/EventMachine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556433 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-02-09 12:01:32 EST --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557021] Review Request: rubygem-merb-gen - Application and plugin generator scripts for Merb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557021 Bug 557021 depends on bug 551817, which changed state. Bug 551817 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551817 What|Old Value |New Value Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551817] Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551817 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-02-09 12:07:37 EST --- Oops... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551817] Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551817 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-02-09 12:06:22 EST --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560460] Review Request: python-zbase32 - A base32 encoder/decoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560460 --- Comment #4 from Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com 2010-02-09 12:04:41 EST --- Ah, sorry. New version: Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-zbase32.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-zbase32-1.1.1-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543425] Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(spoya...@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-02-09 12:00:20 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-02-09 12:08:04 EST --- Closing this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225720] Merge Review: eject
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225720 Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com 2010-02-09 12:09:42 EST --- Thanks, I have no further comments, so this package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562445] Review Request: GitPython - Python Git Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562445 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com 2010-02-09 13:15:28 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: GitPython Short Description: GitPython is a python library used to interact with Git repositories. Owners: jkeating Branches: F-12 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560460] Review Request: python-zbase32 - A base32 encoder/decoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560460 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-02-09 13:32:09 EST --- - Well, I don't know why you use %__python while you don't use such macros for other commands like rm, however this is not a blocker. - About license: Copyright Only: Almost all BSD ./PKG-INFO ./zbase32.egg-info/PKG-INFO LGPLv2 (strict) ./zbase32/zbase32id.py - license tag should be BSD and LGPLv2 (well, actually I don't know why PKG-INFO says this is under BSD, however not a blocker) Other things are okay. Please fix above. -- This package (python-zbase32) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516524] Review Request: globus-duct-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516524 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|steve.tray...@cern.ch Flag||fedora-review? Bug 516524 depends on bug 516522, which changed state. Bug 516522 Summary: Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Bug 516524 depends on bug 516523, which changed state. Bug 516523 Summary: Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542580] Review Request: statusnet - Open Source microblogging platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542580 Zach Copley z...@copley.name changed: What|Removed |Added CC||z...@copley.name --- Comment #4 from Zach Copley z...@copley.name 2010-02-09 13:57:34 EST --- Let me know what I can do to help. The original author of the .spec, Ken Sedgwick, might aslo lend a hand. Zach -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560460] Review Request: python-zbase32 - A base32 encoder/decoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560460 --- Comment #6 from Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com 2010-02-09 13:56:03 EST --- Thanks Mamoru, - Well, I don't know why you use %__python while you don't use such macros for other commands like rm, however this is not a blocker. It's the default template of rpmdev-newspec -t python. I'll changed it though. license tag should be BSD and LGPLv2 (well, actually I don't know why PKG-INFO says this is under BSD, however not a blocker) Ok, I'll ask upstream to clarify. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542580] Review Request: statusnet - Open Source microblogging platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542580 Jan Wildeboer jwild...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwild...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Jan Wildeboer jwild...@redhat.com 2010-02-09 14:01:56 EST --- I would suggest we bump the version up to current stable which is 0.8.3. Maybe even go for 0.9, now that is closer to RC/Beta? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 Michal Babej mba...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(mba...@redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #23 from Michal Babej mba...@redhat.com 2010-02-09 14:02:11 EST --- Hi, I ask because apparently there are new haml dependencies which are not reflected in the current rpm spec, and are needed by haml for features needed in other software. Yard and maruku are not new deps; I intentionally left them out, since those were build dependencies (that is, if you want to build the gem out of git tree), and i didn't want to introduce unnecessary deps. I'll ask upstream, but afaik they still aren't a runtime (or rpm build time) dependency. I know there's new haml; i'll be updating it shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516524] Review Request: globus-duct-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516524 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-02-09 14:08:48 EST --- Hi, A 100% autogenerated package of globus library built with globus guidelines. $ rpmlint SPECS/globus-duct-control.spec \ RPMS/x86_64/globus-duct-control-* \ SRPMS/globus-duct-control-2.1-1.fc12.src.rpm globus-duct-control-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ diff -r -q --brief \~/globus/gt4.2.1-all-source-installer/source-trees/duct/control/source ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/globus_duct_control-2.1 Only in /home/steve/rpmbuild/SOURCES/globus_duct_control-2.1: GLOBUS_LICENSE which is expected. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 531107] Review Request: perl-SQL-Tokenizer - A Perl package to tokenize SQL, generically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531107 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-02-09 14:14:43 EST --- Yes, link still not working. Hangs, firewall? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 539469] Review Request: OpenSRF - Open Scalable Request Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539469 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-02-09 14:27:06 EST --- Sorry typo: OpenSRF.spec:BuildRequires: libmemcache-devel should be libmemcached-devel Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563318] New: ceph - User space components of the CEPH file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ceph - User space components of the CEPH file system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563318 Summary: ceph - User space components of the CEPH file system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jba...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Ceph is a distributed network file system designed to provide excellent performance, reliability, and scalability. SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/jwhiter/ceph-0.18-1.fc12.src.rpm Spec: http://people.redhat.com/jwhiter/ceph.spec I've mockbuilt it and run rpmlint against everything it creates, I get the following now [r...@localhost SPECS]# rpmlint /root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ceph*.rpm ceph.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C CEPH ceph.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalability - availability, sociability, inviolability ceph.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/librados.so.1.0.0 e...@glibc_2.2.5 ceph.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/librados.so.1.0.0 _e...@glibc_2.2.5 ceph.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libceph.so.1.0.0 e...@glibc_2.2.5 ceph.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libceph.so.1.0.0 _e...@glibc_2.2.5 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. the exit() in shared libs can be ignored, they are special C++ classes that are supposed to exit() when an action happens. The other two warnings are dumb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542580] Review Request: statusnet - Open Source microblogging platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542580 --- Comment #8 from Steve Milner smil...@redhat.com 2010-02-09 15:11:43 EST --- Found a few bugs in the package. I'll fix them and post the update a bit later today (path issues -- not upstream bugs). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563318] Review Request: ceph - User space components of the CEPH file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563318 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ceph - User space |Review Request: ceph - User |components of the CEPH file |space components of the |system |CEPH file system --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-02-09 15:54:21 EST --- Scripts parse package reviews, so please either use the template for submitting them or try to stick to the usual format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-02-09 16:02:34 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 522208] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522208 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.3.0-4.el5 |1.3.0-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551817] Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551817 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.5.2-3.fc12|1.5.2-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 547226] Review Request: python-pgu - pygame addon for making GUIs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547226 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09 15:58:31 EST --- python-pgu-0.12.3-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562158] Review Request: dfish (a generic front-end for selecting files)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562158 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.3-1.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562158] Review Request: dfish (a generic front-end for selecting files)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562158 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09 16:00:24 EST --- dfish-1.3-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551817] Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551817 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09 16:00:04 EST --- rubygem-newgem-1.5.2-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 522208] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522208 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09 15:59:49 EST --- dogtag-pki-ca-ui-1.3.0-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 495693] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 - Perl 6 Syntax Highlighter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495693 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-02-09 16:02:54 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551817] Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551817 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09 15:58:58 EST --- rubygem-newgem-1.5.2-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478683] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09 15:58:25 EST --- perl-Net-Google-AuthSub-0.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Net-Google-AuthSub'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-1651 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478683] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09 15:59:42 EST --- perl-Net-Google-AuthSub-0.5-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Net-Google-AuthSub'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1671 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561534] Review Request: ar9170-firmware - Firmware for Atheros AR9170 wireless network adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561534 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-02-09 16:07:21 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560460] Review Request: python-zbase32 - A base32 encoder/decoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560460 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-02-09 16:07:05 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 559856] Review Request: libbsd - Library providing BSD-compatible functions for portability
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-02-09 16:06:43 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551817] Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551817 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.5.2-3.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550369] Review Request: spill - A segregated package install logical linker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550369 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-02-09 16:05:27 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 --- Comment #10 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2010-02-09 16:08:23 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) Thank you for your reply. I just did an unofficial review on django-debug-toolbar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526682 I took one or another look esp. on spec-files of other packages, without anouncing it in bugzilla. If it's required, I'll do some more and review unofficially some packages. Yes, please perform some package reviews, where you try to address at least each item on this list: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines If you only write that rpmlint is ok and mock builds, there is not much information to decide, how familiar you are with the Fedora packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 524423] Review Request: ciso - iso to cso converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524423 --- Comment #13 from Pierre Dorbais pierre.dorb...@free.fr 2010-02-09 16:11:38 EST --- - Source URL fixed - format string compiler warnings fixed - Release and %changelog updated Spec URL: http://chdorblog.free.fr/ciso.spec SRPM URL: http://chdorblog.free.fr/ciso-1.0.0-2.fc12.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 243716] Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243716 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-02-09 16:15:13 EST --- Could we get an ack from the current package owner? Please follow existing EPEL policy when requesting EPEL branches for packages you don't own: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Getting_a_Fedora_package_in_EPEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 243716] Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243716 --- Comment #13 from Jeffrey C. Ollie j...@ocjtech.us 2010-02-09 16:23:27 EST --- Lubomir has my permission, nay, my blessing to maintain the EPEL branches of this package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562977] Review Request: vifm - Lightweight file manager with vi like keybindings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562977 --- Comment #1 from Pierre Dorbais pierre.dorb...@free.fr 2010-02-09 16:24:40 EST --- Hi I packaged up my second package vifm, please review. I also need a sponsor for this and ciso (bug #524423). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 531544] Review Request: python-trml2pdf - Tiny RML2PDF is a tool to easily create PDF documents without programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531544 Matthias Runge mru...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mru...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Matthias Runge mru...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09 16:31:33 EST --- Since, I'm not approved, I may give you an unofficial review: * rpmlint python-trml2pdf.spec python-trml2pdf.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install python-trml2pdf.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean python-trml2pdf.spec: W: no-%prep-section python-trml2pdf.spec: W: no-%build-section python-trml2pdf.spec: W: no-%install-section python-trml2pdf.spec: W: no-%clean-section python-trml2pdf.spec: E: specfile-error error: line 8: Unknown tag: !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN python-trml2pdf.spec: E: specfile-error error: query of specfile python-trml2pdf.spec failed, can't parse 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings. * Name is according to the Naming Guidlines * License LGPLv2+ * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. ok * License.txt included in %doc ok (to be continued...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 Chris St. Pierre chris.a.st.pie...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Chris St. Pierre chris.a.st.pie...@gmail.com 2010-02-09 16:33:28 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: qbrew New Branches: F-13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 243716] Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243716 --- Comment #14 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2010-02-09 16:34:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #12) Could we get an ack from the current package owner? Please follow existing EPEL policy when requesting EPEL branches for packages you don't own: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Getting_a_Fedora_package_in_EPEL This document does not say anything about ack-only EPEL maintainers or that any communication regarding owning an EPEL branch should go via bugzilla afaics. It only says to ask via email. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561534] Review Request: ar9170-firmware - Firmware for Atheros AR9170 wireless network adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561534 John W. Linville linvi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561534] Review Request: ar9170-firmware - Firmware for Atheros AR9170 wireless network adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561534 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09 17:04:15 EST --- ar9170-firmware-2009.05.28-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ar9170-firmware-2009.05.28-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561534] Review Request: ar9170-firmware - Firmware for Atheros AR9170 wireless network adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561534 John W. Linville linvi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561534] Review Request: ar9170-firmware - Firmware for Atheros AR9170 wireless network adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561534 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09 17:04:18 EST --- ar9170-firmware-2009.05.28-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ar9170-firmware-2009.05.28-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 539469] Review Request: OpenSRF - Open Scalable Request Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539469 --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com 2010-02-09 17:10:17 EST --- Right, back in the day when I wrote the original specfile, it wouldn't, but after a talk with Dan Scott at FUDCon in Toronto, Canada, trunk/ has now moved onto using libmemcached-devel instead. I'll fix that as soon as somebody starts reviewing the package, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 243716] Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243716 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-02-09 17:25:03 EST --- And the CVS admins are somehow supposed to psychically know that you asked and received an OK? CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516524] Review Request: globus-duct-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516524 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2010-02-09 17:29:18 EST --- Thank you for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: globus-duct-control Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control Owners: ellert Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551914] Review Request: monodevelop-database - A database plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551914 --- Comment #4 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2010-02-09 17:41:58 EST --- I've looked at the new package and I've observed the following issues: 1. This packages suffers from the same problem with the moved locales as monodevelop-boo: The translations are not found anymore at all. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551911#c5 2. There are a couple of minor rpmlint warnings (typos, lines too long etc., tabs vs. spaces, ...) (no-binary, no-documentation etc. are false positives, they don't need to be fixed) Please can you fix both of the problems before I do the full official review? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551915] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - A gdb debugger addin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551915
--- Comment #4 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2010-02-09 17:58:22 EST
---
(In reply to comment #3)
why do? --prefix=%{_prefix} --bindir=%{_bindir} --datadir=%{_datadir}
--libdir=%{_libdir}
This is OK since the configure script is not a standard autoconf-generated
configure script and so it does not accept all parameters of the %configure
macro.
Unfortunately the package does not compile in current rawhide. I've checked
this on my system as well as in koji.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 243716] Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243716 --- Comment #16 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2010-02-09 18:05:57 EST --- (In reply to comment #15) And the CVS admins are somehow supposed to psychically know that you asked and received an OK? According to the wikipage you referred to, there is no need to verify this, becaus it is not about to ask for permission to branch, but to ask whether the maintainer would rather do it by himself or not. There might be some unwritten law, that says otherwise, or maybe it is written somewhere else, but the procedure on the wiki page also allows to branch if the maintainer did not respond within seven days or if he does not want to maintain the package in EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225720] Merge Review: eject
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225720 Kamil Dudka kdu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|2.1.5-16.fc13 |2.1.5-17.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 243716] Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243716 --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-02-09 18:19:23 EST --- Argue about it all you want; CVS admins are still going to ask unless we're provided sufficient detail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560460] Review Request: python-zbase32 - A base32 encoder/decoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560460 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09 18:24:37 EST --- python-zbase32-1.1.1-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-zbase32-1.1.1-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 484597] Review Request: python-argparse - Optparse inspired command line parser for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484597 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a.bad...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2010-02-09 18:40:42 EST --- Requesting EPEL-5 branch. Emailed with Terje and he said it would be fine for me to take ownership of that branch. Package Change Request == Package Name: python-argparse New Branches: EL-5 Owners: toshio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 243716] Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243716 --- Comment #18 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2010-02-09 18:40:02 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) Argue about it all you want; CVS admins are still going to ask unless we're provided sufficient detail. I do not argue agains it, I only show you, that this is not documented. So if you require this, then please document it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551912] Review Request: monodevelop-java - A java plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551912 --- Comment #6 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2010-02-09 17:49:15 EST --- I've looked at the new package and I've observed the following issues: 1. This packages suffers from the same problem with the moved locales as monodevelop-boo: The translations are not found anymore at all. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551911#c5 2. There are a couple of minor rpmlint warnings (typos, tabs vs. spaces, ...) (no-binary, no-documentation, configure-... etc. are false positives, they don't need to be fixed) Please can you fix both of the problems before I do the full official review? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-02-09 18:52:22 EST --- Too early to request F13 branches. Actually, with no-frozen-rawhide, I don't think there will be any early branching at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562330] Review Request: libnih - Lightweight application development library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562330 --- Comment #10 from Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com 2010-02-09 20:10:46 EST --- Since Petr Lautrbach says just having COPYING is sufficient, if you update the spec to solve the pkgconfig issue I'll approve the package. Maybe you can fix the unused-direct-shlib-dependency too, though I'm not going to hold it up for that warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 559856] Review Request: libbsd - Library providing BSD-compatible functions for portability
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-09 20:17:05 EST --- libbsd-0.2.0-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libbsd-0.2.0-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563376] New: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563376 Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: supercy...@163.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: An easy-to-use telnet client mainly targets BBS users. PCMan X is a newly developed GPL'd version of PCMan, a full-featured famous BBS client formerly designed for MS Windows only. It aimed to be an easy-to-use yet full-featured telnet client facilitating BBS browsing with the ability to process double-byte characters. The package is orphaned at fedora 12 Alpha Freeze, I want to maintain it now: See:https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2736 SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/pcmanx-gtk2.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.9-1.20100210svn.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563044] Review Request: system-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563044 Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@redhat.com 2010-02-09 20:55:28 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: system-setup-keyboard Short Description: Hal keyboard layout callout Owners: drago01 whot Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551817] Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551817 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|ERRATA | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557021] Review Request: rubygem-merb-gen - Application and plugin generator scripts for Merb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557021 Bug 557021 depends on bug 551817, which changed state. Bug 551817 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551817 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA Resolution|ERRATA | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561439] Review Request: aduna-commons-pom - Aduna Commons parent pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561439 --- Comment #1 from Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org 2010-02-09 23:37:58 EST --- rpmlint: aduna-commons-pom.noarch: W: no-documentation aduna-commons-pom.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/aduna-commons-pom 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Seems ok. All MUSTs pass. A few comments: * Consider using cp -a or something like that to preserve the timestamps in %prep. * Consider including the upstream license as a source and put into %doc. All other SHOULDs look good. Also, the SRPM wasn't in the right place, I had to dig around in the webspace for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561439] Review Request: aduna-commons-pom - Aduna Commons parent pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561439 Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org 2010-02-09 23:40:41 EST --- ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550067] Review Request: perl-Template-Tiny - Template Toolkit reimplemented in as little code as possible
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550067 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2010-02-10 01:36:24 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Template-Tiny Short Description: Template Toolkit reimplemented in as little code as possible Owners: mmaslano Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551817] Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551817 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-10 01:46:23 EST --- rubygem-templater-1.0.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-templater-1.0.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 Matthew Kent mk...@magoazul.com changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||1.5.2-3.fc12 --- Comment #24 from Matthew Kent mk...@magoazul.com 2010-02-10 01:47:07 EST --- Ugh, closed the wrong bug id in submitting the update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
