[Bug 516524] Review Request: globus-duct-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516524 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 04:02:22 EST --- globus-duct-control-2.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-duct-control-2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516524] Review Request: globus-duct-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516524 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 04:02:14 EST --- globus-duct-control-2.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-duct-control-2.1-1.fc12 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 04:02:15 EST --- globus-duct-control-2.1-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-duct-control-2.1-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516524] Review Request: globus-duct-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516524 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 04:02:14 EST --- globus-duct-control-2.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-duct-control-2.1-1.fc12 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 04:02:15 EST --- globus-duct-control-2.1-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-duct-control-2.1-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563820] New: Review Request: globus-libxml2 - Globus Toolkit - LibXML2 Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-libxml2 - Globus Toolkit - LibXML2 Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563820 Summary: Review Request: globus-libxml2 - Globus Toolkit - LibXML2 Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-libxml2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-libxml2-1.8-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-libxml2 package contains: LibXML2 Library (virtual GPT glue package) Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus Note - This is a GPT Glue Package: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus#GPT_glue_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563821] New: Review Request: globus-xio-pipe-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus Pipe Driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-xio-pipe-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus Pipe Driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563821 Summary: Review Request: globus-xio-pipe-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus Pipe Driver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-xio-pipe-driver.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-xio-pipe-driver-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-xio-pipe-driver package contains: Globus Pipe Driver Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus Note - This package contains a Globus Plugin - special exception for .la file applies: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus#Plugins -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563822] New: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-sge - Globus Toolkit - Sun Grid Engine Job Manager Setup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-sge - Globus Toolkit - Sun Grid Engine Job Manager Setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563822 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-sge - Globus Toolkit - Sun Grid Engine Job Manager Setup Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-sge.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-sge-2.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The job-manager-setup-sge package contains: Sun Grid Engine Job Manager Setup Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 531107] Review Request: perl-SQL-Tokenizer - A Perl package to tokenize SQL, generically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531107 --- Comment #4 from David Fetter da...@fetter.org 2010-02-11 04:27:39 EST --- Sorry. The machine was down for awhile. Here are the updated spec and SRPM. http://fetter.org/~shackle/perl-SQL-Tokenizer.spec http://fetter.org/~shackle/perl-SQL-Tokenizer-0.19-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561430] Review Request: geronimo-jta - J2EE JTA v1.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561430 --- Comment #6 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2010-02-11 04:54:24 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: geronimo-jta Short Description: J2EE JTA v1.1 API Owners: mef Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561439] Review Request: aduna-commons-pom - Aduna Commons parent pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561439 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 04:53:49 EST --- aduna-commons-pom-16-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/aduna-commons-pom-16-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561430] Review Request: geronimo-jta - J2EE JTA v1.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561430 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560170] Review Request: jcodings - Java-based codings helper classes for Joni and JRuby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560170 --- Comment #9 from Victor G. Vasilyev victor.vasil...@sun.com 2010-02-11 05:07:01 EST --- cvs import done. https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3376 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560169] Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560169 --- Comment #7 from Victor G. Vasilyev victor.vasil...@sun.com 2010-02-11 05:16:33 EST --- cvs import done. https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3377 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563844] New: Review Request: pyzim - Python reimplementation of Zim by the author
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pyzim - Python reimplementation of Zim by the author https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 Summary: Review Request: pyzim - Python reimplementation of Zim by the author Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cheese...@126.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/612778/pyzim.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/612778/pyzim-0.43-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is my first submitted package so a sponsor needed. = Package description = Zim brings the concept of a wiki to your desktop. Store information, link pages and edit with WYSISYG markup. Creating a new page is as easy as linking to a non-existing page. Pages are stored in a folder structure, like in an outliner, and can have attachments. This tool can be used to keep track of TODO lists or ideas, to take notes during a meeting or to draft any other kind of text (blog entries, important mails, etc.). = About the Python branch = Zim with version = 0.42 is a Python reimplementation. And the Python branch is now the one with focus of development and, as the version number and the homepage show, will probably replace the former Perl implementation by the same author. As suggested by Chris Weyl in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560967#c3 , I create this package for the Python implementation. And I make this package conflicting with Zim 0.42 for convenience. = rpmlint result = $ rpmlint pyzim.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint pyzim-0.43-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. = About the test suite = This package comes with test suite, but the test suite can run only in a graphical environment, so cannot run in a pure console environment or a mock chroot. And so I neglect the test suite and its requirements in the spec files. See also: https://answers.launchpad.net/zim/+question/12 Another problem is that a test may probably fail in a locale with multibyte translated string. So it is safe to run the test suite with `LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./test.py`. See also: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zim/+bug/517095 To run the test suite, some extra requirements must be met: pygtk2 pyxdg. And some tests will be skipped if the following requirements are not met: /usr/bin/latex , bzr, dvipng, graphviz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563844] Review Request: pyzim - Python reimplementation of Zim by the author
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 Cheese Lee cheese...@126.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563480] Review Request: aduna-commons-concurrent - Extensions to the Java Concurrency package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563480 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2010-02-11 06:07:41 EST --- Updated version with extra BuildRequirement: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-commons-text.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-commons-text-2.6.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563477] Review Request: aduna-commons-io - Extensions to the Java IO functionality
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563477 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2010-02-11 06:07:08 EST --- Updated version with extra BuildRequirement: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-commons-io.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-commons-io-2.8.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563481] Review Request: aduna-commons-i18n - Internationalization and localization utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563481 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2010-02-11 06:07:58 EST --- Updated version with extra BuildRequirement: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-commons-i18n.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-commons-i18n-1.3.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563483] Review Request: aduna-commons-lang - Extensions to the Java lang package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563483 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2010-02-11 06:08:08 EST --- Updated version with extra BuildRequirement: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-commons-lang.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-commons-lang-2.8.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560172] Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560172 --- Comment #8 from Victor G. Vasilyev victor.vasil...@sun.com 2010-02-11 06:09:17 EST --- cvs import done. https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3378 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563510] Review Request: php-xcache - yet another php cacher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563510 Till Maas opensou...@till.name changed: What|Removed |Added CC||opensou...@till.name --- Comment #10 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2010-02-11 06:39:24 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) (In reply to comment #4) * some code in SPEC is commented out, decreases readability. Why don't you remove those lines? Why is code for RHEL 4 and RHEL 5 included? fixed It's good to remove the commented out lines, but if there is a chance that this package can be included in EPEL[0], then the rhel conditionals are helpful. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563510] Review Request: php-xcache - yet another php cacher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563510
--- Comment #11 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2010-02-11 06:41:10 EST
---
Just noticed this:
Instead of using /usr/share, please use %{_datadir}.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563510] Review Request: php-xcache - yet another php cacher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563510 Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561549] Review Request: eclipse-collabnet-merge - CollabNet Merge Client for Subclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561549
--- Comment #8 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2010-02-11 06:53:48 EST
---
For interest, the differences between the 1.10.0 package and the 2.0.0 package
are extremely minor:
--- F-12/eclipse-collabnet-merge.spec 2010-02-11 11:28:48.277846958 +
+++ devel/eclipse-collabnet-merge.spec 2010-02-11 11:44:58.976480111 +
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
%global eclipse_dropin %{_datadir}/eclipse/dropins
Name: eclipse-collabnet-merge
-Version: 1.10.0
+Version: 2.0.0
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: CollabNet Merge Client for Subclipse
Group: Development/Tools
@@ -22,11 +22,11 @@
BuildRequires: java-devel
BuildRequires: jpackage-utils
BuildRequires: eclipse-pde = 1:3.5.0
-BuildRequires: eclipse-subclipse = 1.6.5
+BuildRequires: eclipse-subclipse = 1.6.6
Requires: java
Requires: jpackage-utils
Requires: eclipse-platform = 1:3.5.0
-Requires: eclipse-subclipse = 1.6.5
+Requires: eclipse-subclipse = 1.6.6
%description
The CollabNet Merge Client has been built on top of Eclipse and Subclipse.
@@ -76,5 +76,8 @@
%doc com.collabnet.subversion.merge.feature/license.html
%changelog
+* Sun Feb 11 2010 Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2.0.0-1
+- Update to version 2.0.0 for Subclipse 1.6.6.
+
* Sun Nov 15 2009 Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 1.10.0-1
- Initial revision of CollabNet Merge Client package
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563510] Review Request: php-xcache - yet another php cacher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563510 Timon timo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #389994|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #8 from Timon timo...@gmail.com 2010-02-11 06:26:54 EST --- Created an attachment (id=390220) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=390220) php-xcache-1.3.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563510] Review Request: php-xcache - yet another php cacher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563510
--- Comment #14 from Timon timo...@gmail.com 2010-02-11 07:40:21 EST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Just noticed this:
Instead of using /usr/share, please use %{_datadir}.
fixed
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563510] Review Request: php-xcache - yet another php cacher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563510 Timon timo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #390219|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #12 from Timon timo...@gmail.com 2010-02-11 07:38:59 EST --- Created an attachment (id=390235) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=390235) php-xcache.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 Victor Bogado bog...@bogado.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(nob...@fedoraproj | |ect.org)| --- Comment #10 from Victor Bogado bog...@bogado.net 2010-02-11 07:39:40 EST --- You should also take a look in the problem with %global vs %define issue that Thomas Spura pointed out in comment #6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563444] Review Request: AnumaanLinux-alpha - A predictive text entry system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563444 --- Comment #9 from Naveen Kumar nku...@redhat.com 2010-02-11 07:50:47 EST --- Updated Spec: http://sandeeps.fedorapeople.org/anumaan/Anumaan.spec Updated SRPM: http://sandeeps.fedorapeople.org/anumaan/Anumaan-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1977292 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561549] Review Request: eclipse-collabnet-merge - CollabNet Merge Client for Subclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561549 Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2010-02-11 08:15:20 EST --- Built successfully for all requested branches. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563673] Review Request: sil-abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563673 --- Comment #5 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 08:25:09 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) How about the Provides: fonts-sil-abyssinica? (bug 563395) I thought I'd not mix this in the renaming, that if I only did the renaming then the review would be easier. I was planning to fix it afterwards, but if you feel like I should fix it in the same time, then let's go :) Also can you reproduce: # note current downloaded filename is lowercase and if so how about renaming the source file? I assumed the source tarball had not changed. I'll take a look at it. (In reply to comment #2) Yeah, your call I think, but it might not hurt for people familiar with the old name. You might add a comment say # added for f13 can be removed for f15. Good idea. I will do that. (In reply to comment #4) Ah also please upload the srpm for reference. :) Doh, why did I upload the binary rpm instead of the src.rpm ? oÔ I scratch-built it in Koji before uploading it to my FedoraPeople space (I don't know how long scratch builds are kept). Here it is: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1976022name=sil-abyssinica-fonts-1.0-6.fc13.src.rpm Anyway, I'll upload a -7 SRPM with your suggestions tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #24 from Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com 2010-02-11 08:47:40 EST --- It seems the patch supplied to the sass engine test is not needed anymore. I used: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-haml.spec / http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-haml-2.2.19-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 165686] Review Request: Syck - YAML for Ruby, Python, PHP and OCaml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165686 Chris St. Pierre chris.a.st.pie...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chris.a.st.pie...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Chris St. Pierre chris.a.st.pie...@gmail.com 2010-02-11 09:09:10 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: syck New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: oliver cstpierre I am going to be maintaining the EPEL branches of Syck, and helping to co-maintain the Fedora branches. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551817] Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551817 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 09:45:38 EST --- rubygem-templater-1.0.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556433] Review Request: rubygem-eventmachine - Ruby/EventMachine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556433 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.12.10-3.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 559856] Review Request: libbsd - Library providing BSD-compatible functions for portability
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.2.0-3.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551817] Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551817 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|1.0.0-1.fc12|1.0.0-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550067] Review Request: perl-Template-Tiny - Template Toolkit reimplemented in as little code as possible
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550067 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 559856] Review Request: libbsd - Library providing BSD-compatible functions for portability
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 09:46:57 EST --- libbsd-0.2.0-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556433] Review Request: rubygem-eventmachine - Ruby/EventMachine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556433 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 09:46:41 EST --- rubygem-eventmachine-0.12.10-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563336] Review Request: libisds - Library for accessing the Czech Data Boxes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563336 --- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2010-02-11 09:54:27 EST --- SRPMS: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libisds-0.1-2.el6.src.rpm Spec: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libisds.spec Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1977607 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551817] Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551817 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.0.0-1.fc11|1.0.0-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561534] Review Request: ar9170-firmware - Firmware for Atheros AR9170 wireless network adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561534 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 09:59:50 EST --- ar9170-firmware-2009.05.28-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551817] Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551817 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 09:59:16 EST --- rubygem-templater-1.0.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562992] Review Request: rubygem-syntax - Ruby library for performing simple syntax highlighting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562992 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lkund...@v3.sk --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2010-02-11 10:06:28 EST --- Mohammed, feel free to apply as co-maintainer in pkgdb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532521] Review request: trove4j - High performance collections for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532521 --- Comment #10 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2010-02-11 12:09:17 EST --- Sorry about that -- here's a new version. Changes: - Remove jboss stuff - Remove maven depmap stuff -- it doesn't seem to provide a POM - Run tests as part of build - Make javadoc package noarch Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/trove4j.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/trove4j-2.1.0-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553705] Review Request: rinputd - A server for receiving input events over the network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553705 Jarod Wilson ja...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #19 from Jarod Wilson ja...@redhat.com 2010-02-11 11:27:51 EST --- Bah, bz mail got buried... Just pushed out an updated SRPM and spec that include the repaired Source0 URL. http://jwilson.fedorapeople.org/packaging/rinputd/rinputd-1.0.2-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563001] Review Request: xfce4-remmina-plugin - Xfce panel plugin for remmina remote desktop client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563001
--- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11
12:14:53 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Seems you forgot to rename the %{srcname} macro to the new name?
No, this is intended. Because after renaming the package %{name} no longer
matches the upstream name, I introduced %{srcname} to have a macro for the
upstream/source name.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558685] Review Request: gloobus-preview - A file previewer for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558685 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 12:23:05 EST --- gloobus-preview-0.4.1-5.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gloobus-preview-0.4.1-5.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561235] Review Request: phpesp - PHP-based survey web application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561235 Hiemanshu himanshu.shar...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||himanshu.shar...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561235] Review Request: phpesp - PHP-based survey web application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561235 --- Comment #1 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2010-02-11 12:26:32 EST --- [ke4...@nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./phpesp.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4...@nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/phpesp-2.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4...@nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/phpesp-2.1.1-1.fc12.noarch.rpm phpesp.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/phpesp/admin/include/lib/adodb /usr/share/php/adodb 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 559699] Review Request: RE-REVIEW of qpid-cpp (rename of qpidc)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559699 --- Comment #6 from Nuno Santos nsan...@redhat.com 2010-02-11 12:05:34 EST --- Fabio, please find updated SRPM and specfile at the same URLs: SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/~nsantos/qpid-cpp-0.5.829175-4.fc13.src.rpm spec: http://people.redhat.com/~nsantos/qpid-cpp.spec I put the patches back in, it's generating the correct version of .so now. Regarding the version, this is 0.5.829175-4, which is higher than what was in rawhide before (qpidc-0.5.819819-1.fc13), and the same codebase but a revision higher than what's in F12 (qpidc-0.5.829175-3.fc12). I fixed most of the warnings from rpmlint (except for no-documentation, etc), but these errors are still present (explanations for each are inline): * qpid-cpp-server.i686: E: non-readable /var/lib/qpidd/qpidd.sasldb 0600 - this is supposed to non-readble * qpid-cpp-server-store.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libaio - there is no explicit lib dependency, there is a requires for a package named libaio: Requires: libaio (line 281) * qpid-cpp-server-store.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/rhm 0775 - supposed to have those permissions * ruby-qmf.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/qmfengine.so ['/builddir/build/BUILD/qpidc-0.5.829175/cpp/src/.libs'] - not sure why it's complaining, I'm using the standard ruby_sitelib and ruby_sitearch macros, not hardcoding any path Nuno -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561235] Review Request: phpesp - PHP-based survey web application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561235 Hiemanshu Sharma hieman...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560071] Review Request: php-pecl-augeas - PHP bindings to the Augeas API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560071 --- Comment #10 from Pedro Padron ppad...@w3p.com.br 2010-02-11 12:52:02 EST --- Remi, I could reproduce the problem here. I have tested in x86_64 only with php-cli, running the phpUnit test suite, that's why I missed it =( I'm debugging the problem right now, which seems to be related to the AugeasException class. As soon as I fix it and push a new release, I'll update this ticket. Thanks for your help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561235] Review Request: phpesp - PHP-based survey web application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561235
--- Comment #2 from Hiemanshu Sharma hieman...@gmail.com 2010-02-11 13:54:26
EST ---
- Package meets naming guidelines
0 Spec file matches base package name.
0 Spec has consistant macro usage.
- Meets Packaging Guidelines.
0 License
0 License field in spec matches
0 License file included in package
0 Spec in American English
0 Spec is legible.
0 Sources match upstream md5sum:
9d5e68fa1af1f4d91da34e76ed95fe19 phpESP-2.1.1.tgz
* Package needs ExcludeArch
0 BuildRequires correct
* Spec handles locales/find_lang
* Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
0 Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
0 Package has a correct %clean section.
x Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
0 Package is code or permissible content.
* Doc subpackage needed/used.
0 Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
* Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
* Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
* .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
* .so files in -devel subpackage.
* -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
* .la files are removed.
* Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
0 Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
0 Package has no duplicate files in %files.
0 Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
0 Package owns all the directories it creates.
0 No rpmlint output. [False Positive]
0 final provides and requires are sane:
Provides:
phpesp-2.1.1-1.fc12.noarch.rpm
config(phpesp) = 2.1.1-1.fc12
phpesp = 2.1.1-1.fc12
Requires:
/bin/sh
/usr/bin/perl
config(phpesp) = 2.1.1-1.fc12
perl(strict)
php = 4.2.1
php-adodb
php-gettext
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
webserver
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1
SHOULD Items:
- Should build in mock.
0 Should build on all supported archs
0 Should function as described.
0 Should have sane scriptlets.
* Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
0 Should have dist tag
0 Should package latest version
* check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews)
[-] To be checked
[x] Need fixing
[*] NA
[0] Checked
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560172] Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560172 Bug 560172 depends on bug 560170, which changed state. Bug 560170 Summary: Review Request: jcodings - Java-based codings helper classes for Joni and JRuby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560170 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560169] Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560169 Bug 560169 depends on bug 560170, which changed state. Bug 560170 Summary: Review Request: jcodings - Java-based codings helper classes for Joni and JRuby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560170 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561482] Review Request: joni - Java port of Oniguruma regexp library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561482 Bug 561482 depends on bug 560170, which changed state. Bug 560170 Summary: Review Request: jcodings - Java-based codings helper classes for Joni and JRuby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560170 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560170] Review Request: jcodings - Java-based codings helper classes for Joni and JRuby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560170 Victor G. Vasilyev victor.vasil...@sun.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Victor G. Vasilyev victor.vasil...@sun.com 2010-02-11 14:48:52 EST --- Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1978297 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563673] Review Request: sil-abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563673 --- Comment #6 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 14:56:10 EST --- Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/sil-abyssinica-fonts/sil-abyssinica-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/sil-abyssinica-fonts/sil-abyssinica-fonts-1.0-7.fc12.src.rpm * Thu Feb 11 2010 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org - 1.0-7 - Use new archive from upstream at same location (which is lowercase now) - Remove dubious Provides: (RHBZ#563395) * Wed Feb 10 2010 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org - 1.0-6 - Renamed from abyssinica-fonts to sil-abyssinica-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560172] Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560172 Bug 560172 depends on bug 560169, which changed state. Bug 560169 Summary: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560169 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Bug 561484 depends on bug 560169, which changed state. Bug 560169 Summary: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560169 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560169] Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560169 Victor G. Vasilyev victor.vasil...@sun.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Victor G. Vasilyev victor.vasil...@sun.com 2010-02-11 15:10:46 EST --- koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1978401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560172] Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560172 Victor G. Vasilyev victor.vasil...@sun.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Victor G. Vasilyev victor.vasil...@sun.com 2010-02-11 15:27:04 EST --- koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1978440 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530251] Review Request: gearbox - A collection of usable peer-reviewed robotics-related libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530251
--- Comment #12 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2010-02-11 16:00:19
EST ---
Here is my quick review. I have asked Jeff Spaleta to go over this as well. He
agreed to do so, and he can sponsor you if he deems the packages acceptable.
MUST
* OK: rpmlint
* OK: package name
* OK: package version and release
* OK: spec file name
* OK: package guideline-compliant
* OK: license complies with guidelines
* OK: license field accurate
* OK: license file not deleted
* OK: spec in US English
* OK: spec legible
* OK: source matches upstream
sha256sum 12170be6b6c477926eb4e274574d877b4ccd7230978088a61b892e6f1dbb6e08
* OK: builds under = 1 archs, others excluded
* OK: dependencies (requires)
* OK: build dependencies complete
* N/A: locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale
* OK: library - ldconfig
* N/A: relocatable: give reason
* OK: own all directories
* OK: no dupes in %files
* OK: permission
* OK: %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT
* OK: macros used consistently
* OK: Package contains code
* N/A: large docs = -doc
* N/A: doc not runtime dependent
* OK: headers in -devel
* N/A: static in -static
* OK: if contains *.pc, req pkgconfig
* OK: if libfiles are suffixed, the non-suffixed goes to devel
* OK: devel requires versioned base package
* N/A: desktop file uses desktop-file-install
* OK: clean buildroot before install
* OK: filenames UTF-8
SHOULD
* OK: if license text missing, ask upstream to include it
* N/A: desc and summary contain translations if available
* OK: package build in mock on all architectures
Koji URLs given by packager
* OK: package functioned as described
Did tests with the Hokuyo laser range finder and worked just fine
* OK: scriplets are sane
* OK: other subpackages should require versioned base
* N/A: if main pkg is development-wise, pkgconfig can go in main package
* OK: require package not files
I'm happy with the package and the parts I could test work here.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556346] Review Request: stage - A 2.5D multi-robot simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556346
--- Comment #8 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2010-02-11 16:18:20 EST
---
And here my quick review for Stage.
MUST
* OK: rpmlint
You shold report the shared-lib-calls-exit to upstream. The library is
calling exit all over the place which could be avoided.
* OK: package name
* OK: package version and release
* OK: spec file name
* OK: package guideline-compliant
* OK: license complies with guidelines
* OK: license field accurate
* OK: license file not deleted
* OK: spec in US English
* OK: spec legible
* OK: source matches upstream
sha256sum 90fb5160655b0c692f6a607d8cd680daacaf4093855937d436abc671b756ab13
* OK: builds under = 1 archs, others excluded
* OK: dependencies (requires)
* OK: build dependencies complete
* N/A: locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale
* OK: library - ldconfig
* N/A: relocatable: give reason
* OK: own all directories
* OK: no dupes in %files
* OK: permission
* OK: %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT
* OK: macros used consistently
* OK: Package contains code
* OK: large docs = -doc
* OK: doc not runtime dependent
* OK: headers in -devel
* N/A: static in -static
* OK: if contains *.pc, req pkgconfig
* OK: if libfiles are suffixed, the non-suffixed goes to devel
* OK: devel requires versioned base package
* N/A: desktop file uses desktop-file-install
* OK: clean buildroot before install
* OK: filenames UTF-8
SHOULD
* N/A: if license text missing, ask upstream to include it
* N/A: desc and summary contain translations if available
* OK: package build in mock on all architectures
Koji builds given by packager
* OK: package functioned as described
Works during short test. Used standalone (stage
/usr/share/stage/worlds/simple.world) and in Player (player
/usr/share/stage/worlds/simple.cfg).
* OK: scriplets are sane
* N/A: other subpackages should require versioned base
* N/A: if main pkg is development-wise, pkgconfig can go in main package
* OK: require package not files
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 --- Comment #18 from Robert Townley rob.town...@gmail.com 2010-02-11 16:21:55 EST --- (In reply to comment #16) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: tinc Short Description: A virtual private network daemon Owners: fab Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: Can we change Short Description A peer-to-peer meshed virtual private network deamon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555162] Review Request: blast - Berkeley Lazy Abstraction Software Verification Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555162 --- Comment #6 from David A. Wheeler dwhee...@dwheeler.com 2010-02-11 17:18:44 EST --- Ugh. Can you send an email to its developers? Maybe vampyre can be untangled by them. Packaging http://code.google.com/p/cpachecker/ is not a bad idea. Other alternatives are: Saturn http://saturn.stanford.edu/pages/overviewindex.html MOPS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564143] New: Review Request: fetch-crl - Downloads Certificate Revocation Lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fetch-crl - Downloads Certificate Revocation Lists https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564143 Summary: Review Request: fetch-crl - Downloads Certificate Revocation Lists Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.tray...@cern.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/fetch-crl/fetch-crl.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/fetch-crl/fetch-crl-2.8.1-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: This tool and associated cron entry ensure that Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs) are periodically retrieved from the web sites of the respective Certification Authorities. It assumes that the installed CA files follow the hash.crl_url convention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563673] Review Request: sil-abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563673 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-02-11 19:36:18 EST --- Thanks Mathieu! Quick re-review: - rpmlint free of warnings :) - license correct - source md5sum unchanged - currently no font .conf file - follows fonts packaging guidelines Renamed package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543425] Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 Siddhesh Poyarekar spoya...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(spoya...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #26 from Siddhesh Poyarekar spoya...@redhat.com 2010-02-11 21:21:00 EST --- Sorry about the delay, here's the koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1978970 Do I request for cvs module for my package now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 23:45:38 EST --- pki-selinux-1.3.3-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 23:44:05 EST --- pki-selinux-1.3.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.3.0-5.fc12|1.3.0-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.3.0-4.fc12|1.3.0-5.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.3.3-1.fc11|1.3.3-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 498195] Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look Feel' similar to Outlook
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498195 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 23:46:58 EST --- zarafa-webaccess-6.30.10-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update zarafa-webaccess'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1798 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 23:47:19 EST --- pki-util-1.3.0-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553683] Review Request: luckybackup - A powerful, fast and reliable backup and sync tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553683 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 23:44:32 EST --- luckybackup-0.3.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553683] Review Request: luckybackup - A powerful, fast and reliable backup and sync tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553683 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 23:48:09 EST --- luckybackup-0.3.5-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553683] Review Request: luckybackup - A powerful, fast and reliable backup and sync tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553683 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.3.5-1.fc11|0.3.5-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||1.3.3-1.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553683] Review Request: luckybackup - A powerful, fast and reliable backup and sync tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553683 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.3.5-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561439] Review Request: aduna-commons-pom - Aduna Commons parent pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561439 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 23:45:28 EST --- aduna-commons-pom-16-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update aduna-commons-pom'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1796 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516524] Review Request: globus-duct-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516524 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 23:48:52 EST --- globus-duct-control-2.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 498195] Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look Feel' similar to Outlook
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498195 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 23:48:46 EST --- zarafa-webaccess-6.30.10-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update zarafa-webaccess'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-1808 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516524] Review Request: globus-duct-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516524 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-11 23:49:17 EST --- globus-duct-control-2.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516524] Review Request: globus-duct-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516524 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.1-1.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562330] Review Request: libnih - Lightweight application development library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562330 Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com 2010-02-12 01:51:49 EST --- All issues have been fixed, so this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
