[Bug 563673] Review Request: sil-abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563673 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-13 03:16:38 EST --- Package imported into CVS and built for Rawhide. Thanks Jens for the re-review and Kevin for the CVS creation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564557] Review Request: gfs-goschen-fonts - A 19th century Greek typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564557 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fonts-b...@lists.fedoraproj ||ect.org --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2010-02-13 05:30:07 EST --- SRPM URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1981773 Description: Georg Joachim Göschen founded in 1782 the publishing house of G.J. Göschensche Verlagsbuchhandlung in Leipzig and was one of the most active publishers of the period in Germany. Göschen was very interested in typography, influenced by the fame and quality of the editions of G. Bodoni and F. Didot. In 1797, he collaborated with the leading scholar of the period, Johann Jakob Griesbach, to edit and publish the New Testament in Greek for which he formed a committee of scholars to decide the new Greek type which were eventually cut by Johann Prillwitz. The book appeared in 1803 and the types show many influences from the Greek types of Bodoni. Their characteristic was the neoclassical form of marked contrast between thick and thin strokes, the cursive style and the large size of the font. The design was too cumbersome to allow general use and can be considered successful only for its indirect influence on the later cut Greek Leipzig type. It is, however, part of the greater heritage of Greek type design and therefore the type has been digitized by George D. Matthiopoulos in 2009 and is part of GFS' type library under the name GFS Göschen cursive, in commemoration of the great German publisher. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GFS_G%C3%B6schen_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564557] Review Request: gfs-goschen-fonts - A 19th century Greek typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564557 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2010-02-13 05:34:38 EST --- Created an attachment (id=390627) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=390627) repo-font-audit output for the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564557] Review Request: gfs-goschen-fonts - A 19th century Greek typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564557 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2010-02-13 05:45:58 EST --- Since koji garbage-collects after a while: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/gfs-goschen-fonts-20100203-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556308] Review Request: paratype-pt-sans-fonts - A pan-Cyrillic typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556308 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2010-02-13 05:50:37 EST --- Since koji garbage-collected http://nim.fedorapeople.org/paratype-pt-sans-fonts-20100112-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564557] Review Request: gfs-goschen-fonts - A 19th century Greek typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564557 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-13 06:21:08 EST --- Oops... Forgot the review-flag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564557] Review Request: gfs-goschen-fonts - A 19th century Greek typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564557
Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boche...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #4 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-13
06:19:31 EST ---
+:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing
MUST Items:
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package.
$ rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/gfs-goschen-fonts-20100203-1.fc13.*
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint SPECS/gfs-goschen-fonts.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
= OFL
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
$ sha1sum SOURCES/GFS_GOSCHEN.zip
4a9f048bd0016d8b0df49c63848c14686f48fc6a SOURCES/GFS_GOSCHEN.zip
[+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one supported architecture.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just
symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in
%post and %postun.
= not applicable
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot}
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is
described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be
removed in the spec.
[+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
= not applicable
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
SHOULD Items:
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
= package was built in Koji and is noarch anyway
Package is APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560457] Review Request: pyutil - A collection of mature utilities for Python programmers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560457 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-02-13 06:27:37 EST --- I think either will do, however I would rename the files rather than deleting the files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564567] New: Review Request: gwaei - A Japanese dictionary for Gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gwaei - A Japanese dictionary for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564567 Summary: Review Request: gwaei - A Japanese dictionary for Gnome Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rene.rib...@free.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://uggla.free.fr/rpmbuild/SPECS/gwaei.spec SRPM URL: http://uggla.free.fr/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gwaei-1.2.1-4.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is my first package, and I'm looking for a sponsor. gWaei is an easy to use and yet powerful full-featured dictionary program for Japanese to English translation. It organizes results by relevance, supports regex searches, tabs, spell checking, kanji handwriting recognition and an accompanying console version for searches through the terminal. The dictionary files it uses are from Jim Breen's WWWJDIC project and are installed separately through the program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564567] Review Request: gwaei - A Japanese dictionary for Gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564567 René Ribaud rene.rib...@free.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560457] Review Request: pyutil - A collection of mature utilities for Python programmers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560457 --- Comment #9 from Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com 2010-02-13 07:42:13 EST --- Thanks, I've renamed them Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pyutil.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pyutil-1.6.1-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564537] Review Request: grc - simple python logfile colouriser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564537
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||terje...@phys.ntnu.no
--- Comment #1 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2010-02-13 07:52:24
EST ---
Some comments:
Release:0.1%{?dist}.svac
Why so uncommon release tag, what't wrong with 1%{?dist}?
%build
- Add a comment about why %build in empty.
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_builddir}/grc-1.3/install.sh %{_builddir}/grc-1.3/ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
- %install will cd into source dir, you should use:
./install.sh $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
I don't understand why you need the build patch, (which is a install patch:-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563336] Review Request: libisds - Library for accessing the Czech Data Boxes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563336 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-13 08:11:26 EST --- libisds-0.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libisds-0.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563336] Review Request: libisds - Library for accessing the Czech Data Boxes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563336 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2010-02-13 08:13:15 EST --- Build in Rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=155918 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551911] Review Request: monodevelop-boo - A boo plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551911
--- Comment #7 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2010-02-13 08:09:14 EST
---
Yes, it looks like that your fix partially fixed it, but probably e.g. md
itself looks for the other location...
I have used something like this in a different package to mark the language
files properly even if there are at an unusual place:
%install
make DESTDIR=... install
find %{buildroot} -type f -o -type l|sed '
s:'%{buildroot}'::
s:\(.*/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ankiqt/locale/\)\([^/_]\+\)\(.*\.mo$\):%lang(\2)
\1\2\3:
s:\(.*/lib/python2.6/site-packages/anki/locale/\)\([^/_]\+\)\(.*\.mo$\):%lang(\2)
\1\2\3:
s:^\([^%].*\)::
s:%lang(C) ::
/^$/d' anki.lang
%files -f anki.lang
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564537] Review Request: grc - simple python logfile colouriser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564537
--- Comment #2 from Carl van Tonder c...@supervacuo.com 2010-02-13 08:45:30
EST ---
Spec URL: http://supervacuo.com/fedora/grc.spec
SRPM URL: http://supervacuo.com/fedora/grc-1.3-0.2.fc12.src.rpm
Why so uncommon release tag, what't wrong with 1%{?dist}?
It started life as a personal use package; fixed
Add a comment about why %build in empty.
Done; it's because there is no compilation step — grc and grcat are python
scripts
%install will cd into source dir, you should use:
./install.sh $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
I don't understand why you need the build patch, (which is a install patch:-)
For some reason, specifying relative paths seemed not to work yesterday, but
now it does indeed work. Patch now removed.
Thanks for taking a look!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555018] Review Request: gnac - An audio converter for GNOME (first package, seeking sponsor)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555018 --- Comment #12 from Taylon taylonsi...@gmail.com 2010-02-13 09:43:02 EST --- Oh sorry, I thought I should increase the release value just after the review process. Here is the package with the release increased: Spec URL: http://taylon.fedorapeople.org/gnac-0.2.1-2.fc12.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://taylon.fedorapeople.org/gnac.spec Thank you very much by the reviews, now another reviewer will continue the package revision? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564588] Review Request: callgit - A tool for Ham Radio Operators to look up callsigns on the web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564588 Jens Maucher je...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Jens Maucher je...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-13 10:11:36 EST --- This is my first self-made package. I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564588] New: Review Request: callgit - A tool for Ham Radio Operators to look up callsigns on the web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: callgit - A tool for Ham Radio Operators to look up callsigns on the web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564588 Summary: Review Request: callgit - A tool for Ham Radio Operators to look up callsigns on the web Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: je...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jensm.fedorapeople.org/callgit.spec SRPM URL: http://jensm.fedorapeople.org/callgit-2.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This progam allows you to search for another Ham's name and address without having a web browser up. It is very simple. rpmlint: rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/callgit-2.0-1.fc13.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2010-02-13 11:08:13 EST --- The requested changes have been implemented, comments are inline justifying the various issues. http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/dpkg/dpkg.spec http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/dpkg/dpkg-1.15.5.6-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532523] Review request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532523 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-02-13 11:14:41 EST --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556308] Review Request: paratype-pt-sans-fonts - A pan-Cyrillic typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556308 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2010-02-13 11:17:10 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) First, one cosmetic nitpick: $ rpm -qivp SRPMS/paratype-pt-sans-fonts-20100112-1.fc12.src.rpm [snip] This package includes the four basic styles and two narrows styles for \ economic setting. Could you make the backslash go away? Stupid mistake, sorry about it, fixed +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/paratype-pt-sans-* paratype-pt-sans-caption-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license PTFL rpmlint is not up-to-date, PTFL is on the official Fedora license list http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts#Approved_font_licenses paratype-pt-sans-caption-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/paratype-pt-sans-caption-fonts-20100112/PT Free Font License_eng.txt paratype-pt-sans-caption-fonts.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/paratype-pt-sans-caption-fonts-20100112/PT Free Font License_eng.txt Missed it with all the stupid spellchecking warnings, fixed (sorry about it, I'm usually better than that) paratype-pt-sans-fonts.src: W: macro-in-%description %_font_pkg This is a bug in rpmlint rpmbuild [-] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. = First one is the one I got from the URL in the spec file, second one is from the SRPM. $ sha1sum PTSans.zip d812b275f2b13e59a69671785b53a4eb5805c561 PTSans.zip $ sha1sum SOURCES/PTSans.zip f72ab3c42157ef81f7398b641213851f77e2deec SOURCES/PTSans.zip Upstream probably did the usual in-place archive update (very common for fonts), I'll use the new version. This package is not approved as the source archives don't match. Fixed http://nim.fedorapeople.org/paratype-pt-sans-fonts-20100112-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564557] Review Request: gfs-goschen-fonts - A 19th century Greek typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564557 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2010-02-13 11:27:37 EST --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gfs-goschen-fonts Short Description: A 19th century Greek typeface Owners: nim Branches: devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560457] Review Request: pyutil - A collection of mature utilities for Python programmers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560457 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-02-13 11:28:12 EST --- Well, * BuildRequires/Requires - Please check if python-zbase32 python-twisted-core python-argparse should be listed only for BuildRequires. ! For example ./pyutil/iputil.py contains: - 9 # from Twisted 10 from twisted.internet import defer, reactor 11 from twisted.python import failure 12 from twisted.internet.protocol import DatagramProtocol 13 from twisted.internet.utils import getProcessOutput 14 from twisted.python.procutils import which 15 from twisted.python import log - It seems that pyutil should also have Requires: python-twisted-core. * rpmlint - pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/test/test_iputil.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/test/test_picklesaver.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/scripts/randfile.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/scripts/randcookie.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/test/test_mathutil.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/lineutil.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/test/test_template 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/test/test_dictutil.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/benchmarks/bench_xor.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/test/test_time_format.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/test/test_strutil.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/scripts/tailx.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/test/test_odict.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/test/test_zlibutil.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/scripts/lines.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/scripts/memdump2dot.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/scripts/unsort.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/test/test_assertutil.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/test/test_xor.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/test/test_cache.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pyutil.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyutil/test/test_jsonutil.py 0644L /usr/bin/env - - These scripts should not have shebang. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 531107] Review Request: perl-SQL-Tokenizer - A Perl package to tokenize SQL, generically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531107 --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-02-13 11:29:34 EST --- Hi, Looks easy to approve but a couple of comments. I see no reason for including MANIFEST.bak in the resulting package. The license is as perl so not just Artistic 2.0 see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#License_tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546451] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Template-IT - Simple template API.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546451 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2010-02-13 11:52:19 EST --- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563510] Review Request: php-xcache - yet another php cacher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563510
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@famillecollet.com
--- Comment #15 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2010-02-13 11:49:50
EST ---
Quick notes
- don't understand why you try to register this as a pecl extension (%post /
%postun).
This is not a pecl extension, and you don't have the package.xml file required
for this.
- so, could also be removed
%global pecl_name xcache
Requires(post): %{__pecl}
Requires(postun): %{__pecl}
Provides: php-pecl(%{pecl_name}) = %{version}
- xcache.ini
zend_extension = /EXT_DIR/xcache.so
no need to give full path.
- %defattr(-, root, root, 0755)
(-,root,root,-) must be enough. php script should be 644
This will remove a lot of rpmlint message
php-xcache.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/php-xcache/admin/...
- admin / coverager
You need to create a alias (httpd/conf.d) to give access to admin URL.
probably also need a writable dir for xcache.coveragedump_directory
If you don't want to make this available, don't install it, just add it in %doc
- INSTALL
don't need this file in RPM
- Buildroot
is acceptable, but read
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543940] Review Request: libmpdclient - Library for interfacing Music Player Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543940 Adrian Reber adr...@lisas.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Adrian Reber adr...@lisas.de 2010-02-13 12:01:23 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: libmpdclient New Branches: F-11 F-12 Owners: adrian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543940] Review Request: libmpdclient - Library for interfacing Music Player Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543940 Adrian Reber adr...@lisas.de changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||562918 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532523] Review request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532523 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2010-02-13 12:03:38 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: jarjar Short Description: Jar Jar Links Owners: mef Branches: F-11 F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556308] Review Request: paratype-pt-sans-fonts - A pan-Cyrillic typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556308 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-13 12:28:46 EST --- [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. $ sha1sum PTSans.zip d812b275f2b13e59a69671785b53a4eb5805c561 PTSans.zip I diffed the new spec file with the previous one, no changes but what was asked here. This package is now APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556308] Review Request: paratype-pt-sans-fonts - A pan-Cyrillic typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556308 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2010-02-13 12:41:17 EST --- Thanks a lot for the review! (esp. since I had missed a few problems) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: paratype-pt-sans-fonts Short Description: A pan-Cyrillic typeface Owners: nim Branches: devel, F11, F12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550668] Review Request: mysql-administrator - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550668 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2010-02-13 12:37:55 EST --- MySQL Adminsitrator (and MySQL Query Browser) goes EOL and will be replace by MySQL Workbench. See http://wb.mysql.com/?p=470 Don't you think it will be greater to work on this new software ? I already have a working RPM, but it need more work (to split out embeded libs) + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 --- Comment #30 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2010-02-13 12:38:32 EST --- 5) Ok, an this note about upstream state is higly appreciated. I saw it in Patch0 (link to public bugtracker is even good, if it mailed - word about it). Patch1 have not such note at all. If it is completely Fedora-related Patch - no problem, just mention it in two words too. 6) No, then no. Ok. (In reply to comment #28) Looks like qlz is available under the GPL-3, although the upstream packaging is, um, minimal in its license statements. I think a _better_ patch would make it a ./configure option, but I don't think the current state should be a blocker on getting the package in Fedora. In most cases such modifications of course good idea make more common. But in our case it is Fedora-specific short cut-off patch and If such configuration switch is not interesting for upstream developer I think it absolutely have no worth for us in packaging. On another note, though: the /etc/lessfs.cfg file is really a _per filesystem_ configuration, not a global one. This is somewhat strange. This is probably a discussion for upstream, but it's important enough that it should get resolved before stuff starts going into production. Instead of /etc/lessfs.cfg, I think there should be /etc/lessfs/sample.cfg, and that should be configured with sensible defaults with the backing storage in (in /var/lib/lessfs/sample, maybe?) instead of the current default /data. Yes. This is good mention. /data is not fit in any hierarhial standards. Package also do not create and do not own it! If package try use it package it provided must be required. I think there one more patch and defaults tuning according our hier policy required. Matthew Miller, thanks for note. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560457] Review Request: pyutil - A collection of mature utilities for Python programmers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560457 --- Comment #11 from Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com 2010-02-13 12:41:44 EST --- Thanks, it should be fixed: Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pyutil.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pyutil-1.6.1-4.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 531107] Review Request: perl-SQL-Tokenizer - A Perl package to tokenize SQL, generically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531107 --- Comment #6 from David Fetter da...@fetter.org 2010-02-13 12:46:36 EST --- Fixed :) http://fetter.org/~shackle/perl-SQL-Tokenizer.spec http://fetter.org/~shackle/perl-SQL-Tokenizer-0.19-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550667] Review Request: mysql-querybrowser - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550667 Bug 550667 depends on bug 550664, which changed state. Bug 550664 Summary: Review Request: mysql-gui-common-static - Common data shared among the MySQL GUI Suites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550664 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550668] Review Request: mysql-administrator - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550668 Bug 550668 depends on bug 550664, which changed state. Bug 550664 Summary: Review Request: mysql-gui-common-static - Common data shared among the MySQL GUI Suites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550664 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550664] Review Request: mysql-gui-common-static - Common data shared among the MySQL GUI Suites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550664 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2010-02-13 12:53:36 EST --- Work on its release starts many month ago... It died before the birth. MySQL Adminsitrator (and MySQL Query Browser) goes EOL and will be replace by MySQL Workbench. See http://wb.mysql.com/?p=470 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564567] Review Request: gwaei - A Japanese dictionary for Gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564567 --- Comment #1 from René Ribaud rene.rib...@free.fr 2010-02-13 13:05:44 EST --- Sorry, Just I just forget to mention the rpmlint output : [...@uggla SRPMS]$ rpmlint gwaei-1.2.1-4.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [...@uggla x86_64]$ rpmlint gwaei-1.2.1-4.fc12.x86_64.rpm gwaei.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/gwaei.schemas 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Mock is fine for i386 as well as x86_64. I don't put the output on this thread feel free to tell if if required. I made a build test with Koji, it looks fine for all architecture. Output here : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1983466 Best regards. René -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563480] Review Request: aduna-commons-concurrent - Extensions to the Java Concurrency package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563480 Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@matbooth.co.uk Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2010-02-13 13:21:38 EST --- I will take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563479] Review Request: aduna-commons-text - Manipulate/transform/parse text in various ways
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563479 Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@matbooth.co.uk Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2010-02-13 13:19:59 EST --- I will take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564567] Review Request: gwaei - A Japanese dictionary for Gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564567
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-02-13
13:38:09 EST ---
Well, I want to go to bed for now, however some brief notes:
- On rawhide your package does not build as below.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1983436
This is because Fedora 13 changed the behavior of linker:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange
To check F-13 linker behavior on F-12/11, you can do this by adding
-
export LDFLAGS=-Wl,--no-add-needed
-
before %configure line.
Then some other notes
- Requires: cjkuni-ukai-fonts is not desired. On Fedora cjkuni- is
the default font for Chinese but not for Japanese. On Fedora Japanese
people use vlgothic-fonts rpm for fonts by default.
- Your spec file contains:
-
#%configure --disable-schemas
%configure --disable-schemas-install
-
With this build log will show (actually
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1983466
shows) that configure is executed twice, not once.
This is because rpmbuild will expand macros (in this case %configure)
anyway even if the line is marked as a comment.
To prevent this, you should use #%%configure so that macros
won't be expanded in comment lines.
- Please consider to use
-
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL=install -p
-
to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible.
This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools.
- Currently documents are installed both under
- /usr/share/doc/gwaei
- /usr/shaer/doc/gwaei-1.2.1
Please unify these directories.
- I have not checked this package in details, however usually the
file ABOUT-NLS is unuseful.
- Files/directories under %{_datadir}/doc/ are automatically marked
as %doc.
- rpmlint may complain, however we usually don't regard gconf schemas
files as config files so please remove %config from gconf schemas
file.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 --- Comment #16 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2010-02-13 13:47:04 EST --- Thanks, we are almost there. I have a few questions, comments and a few minor issues: ? The only rpmlint is: dpkg.src:1: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib which is ironically a lot better than our own rpm package. Anyway, rpmlint is an rpmlint. I fail to understand that why we hardcode the libdir to /usr/lib. I read your comment, but is it not possible to patch those perl scripts to look at /usr/share instead of /usr/lib? On the other hand our rpm package also puts files in /usr/lib. I wonder if this is really a must. ! The devel package looks like it can be made noarch. I don't know if this would screw up our build system though. (Meanwhile dpkg and dselect packages cannot be noarch) * The following directories and possibly their subdirectories are not owned: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Debian/ %dpkgdir/dpkg/methods/ * Build process log does not show us what flags are used during compilation. Please make it verbose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 --- Comment #17 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2010-02-13 13:48:52 EST --- koji seems to be happy with this package too: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1983856 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 --- Comment #18 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2010-02-13 13:57:17 EST --- Actually i put the files in /usr/lib based on our own rpm package, let me see if i can patch it to move the files into /usr/share. Will update and post. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561086] Review Request: perl-String-Escape - String::Escape Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561086 --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2010-02-13 14:17:03 EST --- Koji (success) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1983996 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 511144] Review Request: openstreetmap - A JavaScript library for displaying the OpenStreetMap.org map data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511144 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Bug 511144 depends on bug 508533, which changed state. Bug 508533 Summary: Please, update to OL 2.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508533 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 538172] Review Request: pyactivemq - Python wrapper around activemq-cpp for messaging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538172 Bug 538172 depends on bug 533899, which changed state. Bug 533899 Summary: Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2010-02-13 14:37:06 EST --- Any progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561086] Review Request: perl-String-Escape - String::Escape Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561086 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2010-02-13 14:44:51 EST --- Hmmm... I'm seeing a 404 error when trying to fetch the upstream tarball. [cw...@athena bin]$ wget http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/String/String-Escape-2010.002.tar.gz --2010-02-13 11:41:37-- http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/String/String-Escape-2010.002.tar.gz Resolving www.cpan.org... 207.171.7.177 Connecting to www.cpan.org|207.171.7.177|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2010-02-13 11:41:37 ERROR 404: Not Found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560894] Review Request: perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod - Allow a module's pod to contain Pod::Coverage hints
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560894 --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2010-02-13 14:55:56 EST --- Koji (success) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1984102 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561761] Review Request: perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered - Conversion of numbered HTML entities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561761 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2010-02-13 14:57:15 EST --- Koji (success) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1984104 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560894] Review Request: perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod - Allow a module's pod to contain Pod::Coverage hints
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560894 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561761] Review Request: perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered - Conversion of numbered HTML entities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561761
--- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2010-02-13 15:07:16 EST
---
Not blockers, but:
Replacing PERL_INSTALL_ROOT with DESTDIR would seem to be a good idea, given
the recent fun along those lines :)
Think about including %{?perl_default_filter} by default, even if just pro
forma. It won't hurt anything and might save some pain down the line.
koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1984104
Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic);
make test passes cleanly.
Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum):
894094d26046006d7afd332ad3860d761ed16405 HTML-Entities-Numbered-0.04.tar.gz
894094d26046006d7afd332ad3860d761ed16405
HTML-Entities-Numbered-0.04.tar.gz.srpm
Final provides / requires are sane:
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
= perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered-0.04-2.fc13.noarch.rpm =
rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
provides for perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered-0.04-2.fc13.noarch.rpm
perl(HTML::Entities::Numbered) = 0.04
perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered = 0.04-2.fc13
perl(HTML::Entities::Numbered::Table) = 0.01
requires for perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered-0.04-2.fc13.noarch.rpm
perl(base)
perl(HTML::Entities::Numbered::Table)
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
perl(strict)
perl(vars)
= perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered-0.04-2.fc13.src.rpm =
rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
provides for perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered-0.04-2.fc13.src.rpm
requires for perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered-0.04-2.fc13.src.rpm
perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
perl(Test::More) = 0.32
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 515247] Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515247 --- Comment #7 from Chess Griffin ch...@chessgriffin.com 2010-02-13 15:07:52 EST --- Thanks for the ping. I am going to refocus on this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561761] Review Request: perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered - Conversion of numbered HTML entities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561761 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561761] Review Request: perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered - Conversion of numbered HTML entities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561761 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cw...@alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 538172] Review Request: pyactivemq - Python wrapper around activemq-cpp for messaging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538172 --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-02-13 15:09:00 EST --- Hi, I kind of made a mistake in upgrading activemq-cpp to 3.1 which then meant that the released pyactivemq is incompatible. The SVN head is reported as building but the tests fail, so waiting really. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 237336] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237336 --- Comment #13 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-02-13 15:13:10 EST --- Hi Wes, Can you make the package request and maintain the package? Else I will :-) Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564520] Review Request: frama-c - Framework for source code analysis of C software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564520 David A. Wheeler dwhee...@dwheeler.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dwhee...@dwheeler.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dwhee...@dwheeler.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561761] Review Request: perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered - Conversion of numbered HTML entities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561761 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564520] Review Request: frama-c - Framework for source code analysis of C software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564520 --- Comment #1 from David A. Wheeler dwhee...@dwheeler.com 2010-02-13 15:16:09 EST --- Thanks for creating this package!! I know this was rough to package. I'll post comments later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562785] Package Review: perl-Debug-Client - client side code for perl debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562785 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cw...@alumni.drew.edu --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2010-02-13 15:15:51 EST --- %description might need a bit of work :) And using DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT is probably a good idea, given the recent issues around it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563820] Review Request: globus-libxml2 - Globus Toolkit - LibXML2 Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563820 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||516536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516524] Review Request: globus-duct-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516524 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|516536 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516539] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf - Globus Toolkit - LSF Job Manager Setup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516539 Bug 516539 depends on bug 516531, which changed state. Bug 516531 Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 516539 depends on bug 516535, which changed state. Bug 516535 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2010-02-13 16:21:18 EST --- Review updated for Globus Toolkit 5: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf.spec http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf-2.3-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516537] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-fork - Globus Toolkit - Fork Job Manager Setup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516537 Bug 516537 depends on bug 516531, which changed state. Bug 516531 Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 516537 depends on bug 516535, which changed state. Bug 516535 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2010-02-13 16:21:06 EST --- Review updated for Globus Toolkit 5: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-fork.spec http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-fork-4.0-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|516528 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|516536 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516540] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-pbs - Globus Toolkit - PBS Job Manager Setup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516540 Bug 516540 depends on bug 516531, which changed state. Bug 516531 Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 516540 depends on bug 516535, which changed state. Bug 516535 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2010-02-13 16:21:25 EST --- Review updated for Globus Toolkit 5: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-pbs.spec http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-pbs-4.0-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516538] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-condor - Globus Toolkit - Condor Job Manager Setup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516538 Bug 516538 depends on bug 516531, which changed state. Bug 516531 Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 516538 depends on bug 516535, which changed state. Bug 516535 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2010-02-13 16:21:11 EST --- Review updated for Globus Toolkit 5: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-condor.spec http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-condor-4.2-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516528] Review Request: globus-gram-client-tools - Globus Toolkit - Job Management Tools (globusrun)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516528 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|516526, 516522 | Bug 516528 depends on bug 516519, which changed state. Bug 516519 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-client - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516519 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 516528 depends on bug 516527, which changed state. Bug 516527 Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2010-02-13 16:20:54 EST --- Review updated for Globus Toolkit 5: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-client-tools.spec http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-client-tools-7.3-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516536] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Jobmanager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516536 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|516522, 516524 |563820 Bug 516536 depends on bug 516518, which changed state. Bug 516518 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-protocol - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Protocol Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516518 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 516536 depends on bug 516529, which changed state. Bug 516529 Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-cache - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516529 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 516536 depends on bug 516533, which changed state. Bug 516533 Summary: Review Request: globus-gatekeeper - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gatekeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516533 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA Bug 516536 depends on bug 516532, which changed state. Bug 516532 Summary: Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 516536 depends on bug 516534, which changed state. Bug 516534 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516534 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 516536 depends on bug 516531, which changed state. Bug 516531 Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 516536 depends on bug 516535, which changed state. Bug 516535 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2010-02-13 16:21:00 EST --- Review updated for Globus Toolkit 5: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager.spec http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-10.17-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565232] New: Review Request: perl-Log-Any - Bringing loggers and listeners together
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Any - Bringing loggers and listeners together https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565232 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Any - Bringing loggers and listeners together Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: st...@silug.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Log-Any/perl-Log-Any.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Log-Any-0.11-1.src.rpm Description: Log::Any allows CPAN modules to safely and efficiently log messages, while letting the application choose (or decline to choose) a logging mechanism such as Log::Dispatch or Log::Log4perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565232] Review Request: perl-Log-Any - Bringing loggers and listeners together
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565232 --- Comment #1 from Steven Pritchard st...@silug.org 2010-02-13 17:05:01 EST --- This is required by the latest HTML::Mason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553705] Review Request: rinputd - A server for receiving input events over the network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553705 --- Comment #20 from Stefan Riemens fgfs.ste...@gmail.com 2010-02-13 18:15:11 EST --- Ok great! That means this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks - Storage Management Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565251] New: Review Request: coan - A commandline tool for simplifying the preprocessor conditionals in source code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: coan - A commandline tool for simplifying the preprocessor conditionals in source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565251 Summary: Review Request: coan - A commandline tool for simplifying the preprocessor conditionals in source code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: e...@brouhaha.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/coan/coan.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/coan/coan-4.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratch build for F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1984936 Description: Coan is a software engineering tool for analysing preprocessor-based configurations of C or C++ source code. Its principle use is to simplify a body of source code by eliminating any parts that are redundant with respect to a specified configuration. It is a more powerful successor to the FreeBSD 'unifdef' tool and the 'sunifdef' tool. Coan is most useful to developers of constantly evolving products with large code bases, where preprocessor conditionals and #if-directives are used to differentiate progressive releases or parallel variants of the product. In these settings the upkeep of the product's configuration tree can become difficult and the incidence of configuration-related defects can become costly. Coan can largely automate the maintenance of preprocessor-based configurations and the investigation of configuration- related questions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
