[Bug 563844] Review Request: pyzim - Python reimplementation of Zim by the author
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-03-09 02:45:52 EST --- Looks good. Please fix the release number (Release: line says it is -2, %changelog says -3) and actually rebuild on koji for F-14/13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570876] Review Request: simple-scan - Simple scanning utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570876 Rahul Sundaram changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 517338] Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:30:22 EST --- This package has a few issues left: - It doesn't seem to use the standard fedora CFLAGS - You should include COPYING README NEWS TODO as doc files. - This builds here on f12, but not on devel/rawhide. - The source0 url is invalid here. Gives a 404: not found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571397] Review Request: python-gudev
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571397 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:21:36 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). Reviewer: please remember to assign the review bug to yourself when you review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570876] Review Request: simple-scan - Simple scanning utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570876 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:19:40 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 568428] Review Request: libldb - A schema-less, ldap like, API and database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568428 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:17:52 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). Please remember to dead.package and follow the end of life procedure if you don't want to ever build this on devel. For the overrides, please file a rel-eng trac ticket with what you need in the override. Make sure to use the EPEL component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566409] Review Request: python-SocksiPy - A Python SOCKS module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566409 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:15:40 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566407] Review Request: perl-Number-Bytes-Human - Convert byte count to human readable format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566407 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:15:17 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569893] Review Request: - perl-Net-STOMP-Client - STOMP object oriented client module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569893 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:18:49 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566406] Review Request: packETH - A GUI packet generator tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566406 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:14:29 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566171] Review Request: libhid - A userspace USB HID acess library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566171 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:13:57 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 536718] Review Request: tlomt-sniglet-fonts - A rounded, sans-serif font useful for headlines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536718 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:10:25 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562847] Review Request: bfa-firmware - Brocade Fibre Channel HBA Firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562847 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:12:23 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556433] Review Request: rubygem-eventmachine - Ruby/EventMachine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556433 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:11:57 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562997] Review Request: rubygem-maruku - Markdown-superset interpreter written in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562997 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:12:49 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487296] Review Request: sssd - System Security Services Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487296 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:04:39 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm4-firmware - Firmware for USB ADSL Modems based on Eagle IV Chipset
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:06:42 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). I added a F-13 branch to the request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 237045] Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237045 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:01:37 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 237046] Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237046 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:02:23 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 197963] Review Request: bouncycastle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197963 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 00:59:31 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 237043] Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237043 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:00:40 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 483505] Review Request: perl-PerlIO-gzip - Perl extension to provide a PerlIO layer to gzip/gunzip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483505 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-09 01:03:15 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(ta...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH 2010-03-09 00:06:11 EST --- Ah, sorry. I missed that. fixed in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 483505] Review Request: perl-PerlIO-gzip - Perl extension to provide a PerlIO layer to gzip/gunzip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483505 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iarn...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2010-03-08 23:07:37 EST --- as per #569299, Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-PerlIO-gzip New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: iarnell InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 237045] Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237045 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iarn...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2010-03-08 23:04:52 EST --- as per #569298, Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Hash-WithDefaults New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: iarnell InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 237043] Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237043 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iarn...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2010-03-08 23:06:14 EST --- as per #569295, Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Hash-Case New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: iarnell InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 237046] Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237046 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iarn...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell 2010-03-08 23:02:29 EST --- as per #569301, Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Config-IniHash New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: iarnell InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554243] Review Request: moovida - Media Center
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554243 --- Comment #14 from Alex Lancaster 2010-03-08 22:58:55 EST --- (In reply to comment #13) > Hi Guys, > > Just wanted to let you know I am still here and reading all the comments. It's > been bounced back and forward between people weather I need to open a ticket > for each package or not, but I can't see a solid answer. > > Should I be creating a new bug for each package? Probably a good idea. Just make this bug for the main package (moovida) keep the initial overall discussion in this bug and all package-specific comments and reviews in the separate bugs for each of the plugin packages, then make all the moovida-plugin-* packages depend on this bug so they can be tracked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523877] Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 --- Comment #13 from Chen Lei 2010-03-08 22:39:28 EST --- (In reply to comment #12) > Here's the updated 0.9.0 version: > Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib.spec > SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib-0.9.0-1.fc12.src.rpm > I also included some of the bin programs, but I'm wondering if it would be > best > to prepend "cbf" to them, as names like "convert_image" are a bit ambiguous > and > potentially conflicting. > I didn't split off -doc and -utils, I'd like to get some feedback from fedora > review people on that. Please do not add utils to main package, it'll lead to multilib conflict. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570111] Review Request: rubygem-right_http_connection - RightScale's HTTP/S module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570111 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:36:16 EST --- rubygem-right_http_connection-1.2.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-right_http_connection'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-right_http_connection-1.2.4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570771] Review Request: fedora-easy-karma - Fedora update feedback made easy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570771 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:38:42 EST --- fedora-easy-karma-0-0.3.20100306git00fc20aa.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fedora-easy-karma'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-easy-karma-0-0.3.20100306git00fc20aa.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558228] Review Request: perl-Tk-DirSelect - Cross-platform directory selection widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558228 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:37:32 EST --- perl-Tk-DirSelect-1.12-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Tk-DirSelect'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Tk-DirSelect-1.12-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570771] Review Request: fedora-easy-karma - Fedora update feedback made easy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570771 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:36:00 EST --- fedora-easy-karma-0-0.3.20100306git00fc20aa.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fedora-easy-karma'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-easy-karma-0-0.3.20100306git00fc20aa.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570258] Review Request: rply - A library to read and write 3D PLY files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570258 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:35:30 EST --- rply-1.01-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rply'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rply-1.01-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570258] Review Request: rply - A library to read and write 3D PLY files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570258 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:34:08 EST --- rply-1.01-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rply'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rply-1.01-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|sugar-maze-0-0.4.20091227.f |sugar-maze-0-0.4.20091227.f |c13 |c12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|dpkg-1.15.5.6-3.fc13|dpkg-1.15.5.6-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:37:42 EST --- dpkg-1.15.5.6-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:36:05 EST --- sugar-maze-0-0.4.20091227.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570771] Review Request: fedora-easy-karma - Fedora update feedback made easy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570771 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:31:53 EST --- fedora-easy-karma-0-0.3.20100306git00fc20aa.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fedora-easy-karma'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-easy-karma-0-0.3.20100306git00fc20aa.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570111] Review Request: rubygem-right_http_connection - RightScale's HTTP/S module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570111 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:31:41 EST --- rubygem-right_http_connection-1.2.4-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-right_http_connection'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-right_http_connection-1.2.4-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558228] Review Request: perl-Tk-DirSelect - Cross-platform directory selection widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558228 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:30:32 EST --- perl-Tk-DirSelect-1.12-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Tk-DirSelect'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Tk-DirSelect-1.12-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557546] Review Request: telepathy-sunshine - Gadu-Gadu connection manager for telepathy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557546 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:30:01 EST --- telepathy-sunshine-0.1.6-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update telepathy-sunshine'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/telepathy-sunshine-0.1.6-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:32:32 EST --- tinc-1.0.11-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|dpkg-1.15.5.6-3.fc12|dpkg-1.15.5.6-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|tinc-1.0.11-1.fc11 |tinc-1.0.11-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:33:30 EST --- dpkg-1.15.5.6-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:25:56 EST --- taipeifonts-1.2-12.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update taipeifonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/taipeifonts-1.2-12.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565916] Review Request: php-ezc-Graph - A component for creating pie charts, line graphs and other kinds of diagrams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565916 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-ezc-Graph-1.5-1.fc12|php-ezc-Graph-1.5-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|tinc-1.0.11-1.fc12 |tinc-1.0.11-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:25:25 EST --- dpkg-1.15.5.6-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||dpkg-1.15.5.6-3.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565916] Review Request: php-ezc-Graph - A component for creating pie charts, line graphs and other kinds of diagrams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565916 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:28:10 EST --- php-ezc-Graph-1.5-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:25:05 EST --- tinc-1.0.11-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||sugar-maze-0-0.4.20091227.f ||c11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557546] Review Request: telepathy-sunshine - Gadu-Gadu connection manager for telepathy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557546 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:23:11 EST --- telepathy-sunshine-0.1.6-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update telepathy-sunshine'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/telepathy-sunshine-0.1.6-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:23:41 EST --- sugar-maze-0-0.4.20091227.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565916] Review Request: php-ezc-Graph - A component for creating pie charts, line graphs and other kinds of diagrams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565916 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-ezc-Graph-1.5-1.fc11|php-ezc-Graph-1.5-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:19:54 EST --- sugar-maze-0-0.4.20091227.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|sugar-maze-0-0.4.20091227.f |sugar-maze-0-0.4.20091227.f |c11 |c13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565916] Review Request: php-ezc-Graph - A component for creating pie charts, line graphs and other kinds of diagrams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565916 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:22:47 EST --- php-ezc-Graph-1.5-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565916] Review Request: php-ezc-Graph - A component for creating pie charts, line graphs and other kinds of diagrams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565916 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||php-ezc-Graph-1.5-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565916] Review Request: php-ezc-Graph - A component for creating pie charts, line graphs and other kinds of diagrams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565916 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:14:29 EST --- php-ezc-Graph-1.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557546] Review Request: telepathy-sunshine - Gadu-Gadu connection manager for telepathy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557546 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:17:38 EST --- telepathy-sunshine-0.1.6-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update telepathy-sunshine'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/telepathy-sunshine-0.1.6-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570111] Review Request: rubygem-right_http_connection - RightScale's HTTP/S module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570111 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:18:26 EST --- rubygem-right_http_connection-1.2.4-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-right_http_connection'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-right_http_connection-1.2.4-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554260] Review Request: ibus-table-xingma - The structure tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554260 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:11:32 EST --- ibus-table-xingma-1.2.0.20100305-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ibus-table-xingma'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-table-xingma-1.2.0.20100305-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||tinc-1.0.11-1.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570258] Review Request: rply - A library to read and write 3D PLY files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570258 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:13:28 EST --- rply-1.01-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rply'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rply-1.01-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 22:12:12 EST --- tinc-1.0.11-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563844] Review Request: pyzim - Python reimplementation of Zim by the author
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 --- Comment #9 from Chen Lei 2010-03-08 22:02:06 EST --- Hi Mamoru, Please take a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560967 Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 517338] Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-03-08 20:19:26 EST --- Hi npajkovs, when you request cvs you should set flag to '?' instead of '+'. (In reply to comment #14) > This ticket is not assigned to anyone. It should be assigned to the reviewer. > Please fix and re-set the fedora-cvs flag. I am the reviewer assignee. Please kindly create cvs for Nikola. Thank you very much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566171] Review Request: libhid - A userspace USB HID acess library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566171 Manuel F Martinez changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Manuel F Martinez 2010-03-08 19:43:20 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libhid Short Description: A userspace USB HID acess library Owners: manpaz Branches: F-12, F-13 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 568149] Review Request: RunSnakeRun - GUI Viewer for Python profiling runs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568149 Dave Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Dave Malcolm 2010-03-08 19:24:02 EST --- Thanks. I've imported the SRPM into the various CVS branches. Unfortunately I've really should have scratch-built this in Koji before submitting this for review; it built OK on my laptop, but not in Koji, giving this error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/RunSnakeRun-2.0.0-0.3.b4.fc12.noarch/usr/bin/runsnake I noticed this in the Koji F-12 build log: /usr/lib/python2.6/distutils/dist.py:266: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'entry_points' which I don't get on my laptop, with: python-setuptools-0.6c9-5.fc12.noarch This turned out to be a missing: BuildRequires: python-setuptools My bad; sorry. I've fixed this in CVS and successfully built the package into the various branches: dist-f14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2040005 dist-f13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2040063 dist-f12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2040103 So I think we're done; closing this out as NEXTRELEASE. Thanks Ionut and Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563844] Review Request: pyzim - Python reimplementation of Zim by the author
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844
--- Comment #8 from Cheese Lee 2010-03-08 19:09:27 EST ---
* Followed all your instructions.
* Changes:
- Removed python_sitearch macro definition
- Provides Zim(obsoleted package name)
- Removed multiple build requirements and run-time requirements
- License tag changed to "GPLv2+ and LGPLv3+"
- Mimetype icons contained directly in the package
- Scriptlets updated
* Above pyzim version of this package will not be updated any more.
* Updated URLs:
- Spec URL: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/612778/zim.spec
- SRPM URL: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/612778/zim-0.44-3.fc12.src.rpm
* Thank you!
(In reply to comment #7)
> As this package is "zim" application and not some python module,
> the srpm should be named as "zim", not "pyzim" or "python-zim".
>
> Some quick notes for zim-0.44-2
>
> * Unneeded macros
> - %python_sitearch macro is used nowhere.
>
> * License
> - as "./zim/_lib/xdot.py" is under GPLv3+ (would you ask the upstream
> why?), the license tag should be "GPLv2+ and GPLv3+"
>
> * Obsoletes/Provides
> - For this case, this package should provide "Zim = %{version]-%{release}"
> as this is a rewritten pkg of Zim ( see the explanation by
> $ rpmlint -I obsolete-not-provided )
>
> * Requires
> - "R: gtk2 >= 2.6" is unneeded (at least on Fedora)
> - because all gtk2 packages in currently supported Fedora branches
> all have higher version than 2.6, and gtk2 is pulled in by pygtk2.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
>
> - "R: shared-mime-info desktop-file-utils" are not needed
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo
>
> - "R: xdg-utils" should be removed (explained below)
>
> - "R: pygobject2" is not needed because pygtk2 pulls in this dependency.
>
> - Also "R: python-simplejson" line is not needed (at least on Fedora)
> because
> F-11/12/13/14 python has 2.6+ version.
>
> * default %setup
> - %setup line can simply be "%setup -q" because the default argument to
> "-n" option is %{name}-%{version}
>
> * About xdg-icon-resource
> - For xdg-icon-resource in %post:
> A. Currently the command line fails.
> ---
> # xdg-icon-resource install --context mimetypes --size 64 zim.png
> application-x-zim-notebook ; echo $?
> xdg-icon-resource: file 'zim.png' does not exist
> 2
> ---
> B. When you change "zim.png" to "%{_datadir}/pixmaps/zim.png" in
>%post,
> B-1 This creates 2 files (1 file / 1 symlink) under
> %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/64x64/mimetypes/
> B-2 As rpm transaction order is
> newrpm's pre-> newrpm installation -> newrpm's post -> oldrpm's preun
> -> oldrpm cleanup -> oldrpm's postun:
>
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Scriptlet_Ordering
>
> With your scriptlets order, when zim is to be upgraded, created 2
> files
> will be removed after transaction.
>
>So it is preferable that xdg-icon-resource is called at %install
> beforehand:
> ---
> %install
> ...
> ...
> %find_lang zim
>
> mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/64x64/mimetypes/
> ( export XDG_DATA_DIRS=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/
> export XDG_DATA_HOME=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/
> export KDE_SESSION_VERSION=invalid
> export XDG_UTILS_DEBUG_LEVEL=100
> xdg-icon-resource install \
> --noupdate \
> --context mimetypes \
> --size 64 \
> %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/zim.png \
> application-x-zim-notebook
> )
> ---
> Or more simply:
> ---
> %install
>
>
> MIMETYPESDIR=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/64x64/mimetypes/
> mkdir -p $MIMETYPEDIR
> install -cpm 644 %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/zim.png
> $MIMETYPEDIR/application-x-zim-notebook.png
> ln -sf application-x-zim-notebook.png
> $MIMETYPEDIR/gnome-mime-application-x-zim-notebook.png
> ---
> ... and
> - add two newly created filed to %files
> - and follow:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedo
[Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 --- Comment #22 from Bill McGonigle 2010-03-08 18:35:44 EST --- Oh, and a patch is needed for more recent ASUS BIOS'es due to some device renaming for AHCI. Should we assume current BIOS'es here and patch or somehow try to keep a map of old BIOS's (ick). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554243] Review Request: moovida - Media Center
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554243 --- Comment #13 from Graeme Gillies 2010-03-08 17:29:33 EST --- Hi Guys, Just wanted to let you know I am still here and reading all the comments. It's been bounced back and forward between people weather I need to open a ticket for each package or not, but I can't see a solid answer. Should I be creating a new bug for each package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 526916] Review Request: orc - The Oil Runtime Compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526916
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||kwiz...@gmail.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|kwiz...@gmail.com
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #13 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2010-03-08
17:22:03 EST ---
There are several problems with this package.
- The testsuite is failing
* Most problem seems related to libtool not patched to use /usr/lib64 by
default, so it could be easier to use autoreconf -vif
* One test is failing because of assembler code (on F-12 x86_64 AMD64)
- There is still rpath on produced binaries (at least on x86_64) by disabled
with autoreconf
- building docs produce errors. (missing BR ?)
- It's usually better to install with install -p to prevents timestamp change
for headers, doing like:
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p"
- rpmlint on installed file isn't quiet:
rpmlint orc
orc.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liborc-0.4.so.0.0.0 floor
orc.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liborc-0.4.so.0.0.0 sqrtf
orc.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/liborc-pixel-0.4.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
orc.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/liborc-pixel-0.4.so.0.0.0 /lib64/librt.so.1
orc.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/liborc-float-0.4.so.0.0.0 /lib64/librt.so.1
-> liborc misses -lm at link time.
- Contradiction with README:
- Q: How big is the Orc library?
A: Compiled with only one target (SSE), the library size is about
86 kB uncompressed, or 30 kB compressed. The goal is to keep the
uncompressed size under about 100 kB.
# ls -alh /usr/lib64/liborc-0.4.so.0.0.0
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 293K mars 8 23:03 /usr/lib64/liborc-0.4.so.0.0.0
Do we know if this library grown abnormally or that was expected and the
README need to be corrected ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 --- Comment #21 from Valent Turkovic 2010-03-08 17:15:11 EST --- I'm working on other project to make Fedora better and making a custom Fedora remix, taking over management of Fedora Geo spin and lots of other things... and asking politely for a update on progress of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 197963] Review Request: bouncycastle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197963 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Steve Traylen 2010-03-08 17:16:00 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: bouncycastle New Branches: EL-5 Owners: stevetraylen Quoting the fedora owner from bug #571580: Hi' I have been dealing with bouncycastle updates for the last year. I have no interest in EPEL, so go ahead. Ask for cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 --- Comment #20 from Valent Turkovic 2010-03-08 17:13:31 EST --- @Chistopher I have other priorities, and I'm just asking politely not nagging. If you feel nagged please feel free to ignore me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569204] Review Request: rawtherapee - Raw image processing software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569204 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-03-08 16:54:51 EST --- There look to be several licensing questions in here, please let me know if I missed any: 1. There is not clear licensing on the included translations and themes. If upstream cannot clarify the licensing of those files, they need to be removed. 2. Several files have unclear licensing: rawtherapee-3.0/rtengine/iccjpeg.c: Copied 99% intact from lcms (jpegicc/iccjpeg.c) rawtherapee-3.0/rtengine/jdatasrc.c: Modified copy from libjpeg ( rawtherapee-3.0/rtengine/dcraw.c: Exact copy from dcraw (dcraw/dcraw.c) rawtherapee-3.0/rtengine/iccjpeg.h: Copied 99% intact from lcms (jpegicc/iccjpeg.h) The files copied from lcms are MIT. (I'm not crazy about the file copying, but this code chunk isn't in the lcms library.) The file copied from dcraw is GPLv2+. There is no dcraw library, because upstream thinks it is better for people to either copy the dcraw code into their application or fork off dcraw processes. I can't wait for the first major dcraw exploit to come out. :P The file copied from libjpeg is IJG. The rawtherapee upstream went to some trouble to fork this code and obfuscate the function names so it could link to libjpeg without conflicting. I have no idea why, but I suspect this is a security exploit waiting to happen. If I were the maintainer here, I'd try to patch this to use the system libjpeg instead. * Leaving FE-Legal in place until the translations/theme licensing is either clarified or the files are clearly removed. Nevertheless, from a strict licensing perspective, these files are all acceptably licensed, if poorly marked. License tag on this package should be: License: GPLv3 and MIT and IJG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523877] Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 --- Comment #12 from Tim Fenn 2010-03-08 16:42:53 EST --- Here's the updated 0.9.0 version: Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib-0.9.0-1.fc12.src.rpm I also included some of the bin programs, but I'm wondering if it would be best to prepend "cbf" to them, as names like "convert_image" are a bit ambiguous and potentially conflicting. I didn't split off -doc and -utils, I'd like to get some feedback from fedora review people on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530374] Review Request: nitrogen - A background browser and setter for X windows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530374 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-03-08 16:32:47 EST --- Umm, I'm assuming you are referring to src/md5.c, which is under the zlib license. The rest of the code is clearly marked as GPLv2+. The license tag should be: License: GPLv2+ and zlib and CC-BY-SA Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 536718] Review Request: tlomt-sniglet-fonts - A rounded, sans-serif font useful for headlines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536718 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-03-08 16:24:30 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: tlomt-sniglet-fonts Short Description: A rounded, sans-serif font useful for headlines Owners: spot Branches: F-11 F-12 F-13 devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562847] Review Request: bfa-firmware - Brocade Fibre Channel HBA Firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562847 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-03-08 16:20:22 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: bfa-firmware Short Description: Brocade Fibre Channel HBA Firmware Owners: spot Branches: F-11 F-12 F-13 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 --- Comment #19 from Christoph Wickert 2010-03-08 16:15:19 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) > I think we can do better than "why don't you become a computer programmer if > you want this to proceed?". Nobody expects somebody to become a programmer, we are talking about packaging and reviewing here. In case you didn't konw, Valent already is a Fedora ambassador for years now and as such it should be possible for him to read the packaging and the review guidelines in order to get involved instead of just nagging other people for ages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553717] Review Request: libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553717 --- Comment #28 from Peter Robinson 2010-03-08 16:13:28 EST --- (In reply to comment #27) > BuildRoot tag isn't required any longer: Ah, cool. Someone should update rpmlint! And re-looking at the review guidelines you only need to include a licence file if its included in the source release so that is OK too. > No progress to report on the license front just yet, will ping Broadcom > again... I don't think that blocks the rest of it as I think you remove the firmware from the source tar file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571364] Review Request: man-db - Database cached manual pager suit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571364
Terje Røsten changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||terje...@phys.ntnu.no
--- Comment #1 from Terje Røsten 2010-03-08 16:05:24
EST ---
Not a instant success:
$ rpm x86_64/man-db-2.5.7-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
1:man-db ### [100%]
$ man man
man: can't open the manpath configuration file /usr/local/etc/man_db.conf
Some comments
> mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/cron.daily
> install -m755 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/cron.daily/man-db.cron
could be one line and use sysconfdir macro:
install -D -m 0755 %{SOURCE1}
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/cron.daily/man-db.cron
make CC="gcc $RPM_OPT_FLAGS"
might change to:
make CC="{__cc} $RPM_OPT_FLAGS"
might be more explicit here:
# documentation and translation
%{_mandir}/man1/*
%{_mandir}/man5/*
%{_mandir}/man8/*
Unsure about the %lang stuff, could the %find_lang macro be used.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files
Compile flags is not visible during build, is correct flags used?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 --- Comment #18 from Bill McGonigle 2010-03-08 16:07:05 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) > Why don't you get involved? Submit a package, become a packager and review > this package. I think we can do better than "why don't you become a computer programmer if you want this to proceed?". At a minimum we need a new icon and that hasn't been changed yet. That would be a contribution most users could achieve. FWIW, I still use this because my eee randomly shuts off bits of hardware at the BIOS level and eee-control can turn them back on. It also keep the fan a bit more relaxed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561448] Review Request: jffi - Java Foreign Function Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561448
Mohammed Morsi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|needinfo?(mmo...@redhat.com |
|) |
--- Comment #7 from Mohammed Morsi 2010-03-08 15:32:06 EST
---
Sorry for the delay, alot of things in the work queue.
(In reply to comment #5)
> For -2:
>
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > > B Even after -Werror is removed, build fails on ppc64:
> > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1997040
> > > The failing command is:
> > > Well, -m32 is wrong for ppc64. This is because
> > > {jni/libtest}/GNUmakefile
> > > does not check if the arch is ppc64 or not however
> > > this check is anyway not needed anyway.
> >
> > I see the same thing, this isn't a blocker since it builds fine of i686 and
> > x86_64 correct?
>
> * Unless build failure on ppc{,64} cannot really be fixed, please fix.
> - For the issue that -m32 is passed on ppc64, adding
> --
> sed -i.cpu -e '/m\$(MODEL)/d' \
> jni/GNUmakefile libtest/GNUmakefile
> --
> at %prep is enough.
>
> ! Note
> Unless you create ppc{,64} packages, we will have to write "Exclude: ppc
> pp64"
> declaration on all packages which depend on jffi, which is really not
> desired
> unless this is really unavoidable.'
I'm having trouble getting it to build in a ppc mock / koji environment in the
first place. The link to your koji build doesn't seem available and when I goto
run either
koji build --scratch --arch-override ppc64 dist-f14 jffi-0.6.5-3.fc12.src.rpm
or
su - build -c "mock -r fedora-devel-ppc /tmp/jffi-0.6.5-3.fc12.src.rpm "
Neither is successful. In the case of Koji, I get
"BuildError: No matching arches were found"
I've submitted packages and seen them submitted that don't build on ppc w/out
any fuss, I think they get pushed to the architectures they work on and that
have all required dependencies, the others are just ignored.
>
> > > * Test
> > > - Forgot to mention this, however please check if some test programs
> > > are available or not (as this package contains test/ directory)
> > >
> >
> > Package now includes a check section which runs the test suite. All tests
> > run
> > fine.
> * Well, unfortunately test fails on ppc{,64}, I don't know why,
> need to remove test/ directory on ppc{,64}.
>
> > > * Empty debuginfo
> > > ---
> > > jffi-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources
> > > ---
> > > - Well, I don't know how Java packages treat this by default,
> > > however generally to create debuginfo rpm corretly, libjffi-0.6.so
> > > should not be stripped in build process itself and should
> > > be handled by find-debuginfo.sh and so on.
> >
> > I'm not getting this error. Instead I get
> >
> > W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/jffi/libjffi-0.6.so
>
> - Did you try rpmlint on -debuginfo rpm? (by the way, is redhat-rpm-config
> rpm correctly installed?)
Ah I was missing that package. Thanks for the tip.
>
> > Removing the call to "strip" in the makefile and marking the shared object
> > as
> > executable does not seem to generate the debuginfo package as detailed
> > online.
>
> - It does create debuginfo rpm
> (well, actually as I did not want to check where strip is used in detail,
> I used:
> ---
> mkdir -p BIN
> cd BIN
> ln -sf /bin/true strip
> cd ..
> ---
> at %prep and after that I added
> ---
> export PATH=$(pwd)/BIN:$PATH
> ---
> to add %prep, %build, %install
>
> > Unless you know of the fix, I'm leaving this as is as there seem to be other
> > packages that have been approved / accepted in lieu of this warning.
>
> - Unfortunately I am not going to approve any packages unless debuginfo
> rpm issue is properly handled.
Done. The first patch replaces 'strip' w/ /bin/true, taking care of this error.
> ! Note
> With debuginfo rpm correctly created, rpmlint warns like:
> ---
> jffi-debuginfo.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm
> /usr/src/debug/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/jni/jffi/jffi.h
>
[Bug 570113] Review Request: rubygem-right_aws - Interface classes for Amazon EC2/EBS, SQS, S3, SDB and ACF
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570113 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 15:20:28 EST --- rubygem-right_aws-1.10.0-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-right_aws'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-right_aws-1.10.0-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570771] Review Request: fedora-easy-karma - Fedora update feedback made easy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570771 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 15:20:04 EST --- fedora-easy-karma-0-0.3.20100306git00fc20aa.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fedora-easy-karma'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-easy-karma-0-0.3.20100306git00fc20aa.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570111] Review Request: rubygem-right_http_connection - RightScale's HTTP/S module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570111 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 15:21:16 EST --- rubygem-right_http_connection-1.2.4-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-right_http_connection'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-right_http_connection-1.2.4-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543917] Review Request: check_postgres - PostgreSQL monitoring script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543917 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 15:22:25 EST --- check_postgres-2.14.2-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update check_postgres'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check_postgres-2.14.2-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543917] Review Request: check_postgres - PostgreSQL monitoring script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543917 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 15:22:31 EST --- check_postgres-2.14.2-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update check_postgres'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check_postgres-2.14.2-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570771] Review Request: fedora-easy-karma - Fedora update feedback made easy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570771 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 15:21:28 EST --- fedora-easy-karma-0-0.3.20100306git00fc20aa.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fedora-easy-karma'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-easy-karma-0-0.3.20100306git00fc20aa.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.34-5. ||el4 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 165686] Review Request: Syck - YAML for Ruby, Python, PHP and OCaml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165686 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||syck-0.55-10.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-08 15:20:33 EST --- perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.34-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
