[Bug 562366] Review request: zinnia - online handwriting recognition system with machine learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562366
--- Comment #16 from Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com 2010-03-09 03:00:30
EST ---
Whether I added LD_LIBRARY_PATH=%{buildroot}%{_libdir}, the test of python and
perl failed. It seems to lack some library that the test needs.
+ python test.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File test.py, line 3, in module
import zinnia
File /home/fedora/rpmbuild/BUILD/zinnia-0.05/python/zinnia.py, line 25, in
module
_zinnia = swig_import_helper()
File /home/fedora/rpmbuild/BUILD/zinnia-0.05/python/zinnia.py, line 17, in
swig_import_helper
import _zinnia
ImportError: No module named _zinnia
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.OiRnPH (%check)
the test of perl without LD_LIBRARY_PATH=%{buildroot}%{_libdir}
+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -Iblib/lib -Iblib/arch test.pl
Can't load
'/home/fedora/rpmbuild/BUILD/zinnia-0.05/perl/blib/arch/auto/zinnia/zinnia.so'
for module zinnia: libzinnia.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory at /usr/lib64/perl5/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/DynaLoader.pm
line 203.
at /home/fedora/rpmbuild/BUILD/zinnia-0.05/perl/blib/lib/zinnia.pm line 11
Compilation failed in require at test.pl line 6.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at test.pl line 6.
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.lpeD52 (%check)
the test of perl with LD_LIBRARY_PATH=%{buildroot}%{_libdir}
+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -Iblib/lib -Iblib/arch test.pl
0.05
No such file or directory: cannot open
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ldwoL5 (%check)
Should we give up the %check section? It requires a lot of libraries.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563844] Review Request: pyzim - Python reimplementation of Zim by the author
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565376] Review Request: qstardict - StarDict clone written in Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565376 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-03-09 03:27:40 EST --- Okay. This package (qstardict) is APPROVED by mtasaka Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from Install the Client Tools (Koji). Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 11/12/13, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571397] Review Request: python-gudev
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571397 Petr Lautrbach plaut...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|plaut...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 --- Comment #13 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2010-03-09 04:00:29 EST --- Oops. done for both branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562366] Review request: zinnia - online handwriting recognition system with machine learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562366 --- Comment #17 from Chen Lei supercy...@163.com 2010-03-09 04:00:15 EST --- I'll be lenient with %check section. The test of zinna must have handwriting-ja.model exist which was included in the zinnia-tomoe package, however zinnia-tomoe itself depends on zinnia. After packaging zinnia and zinnia-tomoe, I sucessfully test the zinnia python wrapper in my computer. python test.py と 0.960155 壞 -0.925115 覩 -0.927522 弟 -0.936278 差 -0.940077 切 -0.941255 杜 -0.943064 往 -0.943233 灯 -0.943703 春 -0.461282 香 -0.983121 佶 -1.007118 背 -1.185125 酋 -1.242691 俺 -1.270646 孝 -1.294053 牛 -1.315449 荅 -1.330078 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-03-09 04:09:19 EST --- Thank you. Now for F-13 would you submit the rebuilt one to bodhi? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562469] Review Request: openvas-scanner - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562469 --- Comment #10 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com 2010-03-09 04:27:13 EST --- Ok, I added sysconfig file, daily cron script. I also added new option to init.d script, reloadplugins, that sends HUP signal to openvas scanner if it is running. Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas3/openvas-scanner.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas3/openvas-scanner-3.0.1-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 --- Comment #16 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2010-03-09 04:42:12 EST --- Yep. thanks for reminding. done :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-09 04:41:29 EST --- kasumi-2.5-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kasumi-2.5-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565830] Review Request: paktype-nashk-basic-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565830 --- Comment #8 from Naveen Kumar nku...@redhat.com 2010-03-09 05:12:20 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) - .conf file in .ttf file, style is written as Decorative, please confirm it, what we suppose to write in that case in .conf file I do not much about this. For the time being it is written as sans-serif. Updated Spec SRPM: SPEC: http://nkumar.fedorapeople.org/paktype-nashk-basic-fonts/paktype-nashk-basic-fonts-3.0-4/paktype-nashk-basic-fonts.spec SRPM: http://nkumar.fedorapeople.org/paktype-nashk-basic-fonts/paktype-nashk-basic-fonts-3.0-4/paktype-nashk-basic-fonts-3.0-4.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2040498 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-03-09 04:59:25 EST --- Thank you. Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565376] Review Request: qstardict - StarDict clone written in Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565376 Cheese Lee cheese...@126.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Cheese Lee cheese...@126.com 2010-03-09 10:10:28 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: qstardict Short Description: StarDict clone written in Qt4 Owners: cheeselee Branches: F-11 F-12 F-13 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571397] Review Request: python-gudev
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571397 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2010-03-09 05:47:23 EST --- i forgot that F-13 has been already branched, I request additional branch to be created... New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-gudev Short Description: Python (PyGObject) bindings to the GUDev library Owners: msuchy Branches: F-13 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571397] Review Request: python-gudev
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571397 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566729] Review Request: CharLS - An optimized implementation of the JPEG-LS standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566729
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-03-09 06:37:42 EST
---
REVIEW:
+ rpmlint is almost silent:
Workplace ~: rpmlint Desktop/CharLS-*
CharLS-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Workplace ~:
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines .
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines .
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum CharLS-1.0_beta.zip
~/Desktop/CharLS-1.0_beta.zip
c6fdbdb48d18205afaf7ae4b9e73984ee4bf927cec99a86c3c0ad3e2021e8c99
CharLS-1.0_beta.zip
c6fdbdb48d18205afaf7ae4b9e73984ee4bf927cec99a86c3c0ad3e2021e8c99
/home/petro/Desktop/CharLS-1.0_beta.zip
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES:
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture. See koji link above.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines.
0 No need to handle locales.
+ The package calls ldconfig in %post and %postun.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
0 The package does not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package own all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example. The %files section includes a
%defattr(...) line.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ Header files are in a -devel package.
0 No static libraries.
0 The package does not contain pkgconfig(.pc) files.
+ The library files that end in .so (without suffix) are in a -devel package.
+ The devel sub-package requires the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554234] Review Request: ibus-table-yinma - The phonetic tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554234 Chen Lei supercy...@163.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|supercy...@163.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571397] Review Request: python-gudev
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571397 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||452450(F-Spacewalk) Alias||python-gudev -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554239] Review Request: ibus-table-latin - The Latin tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554239 Chen Lei supercy...@163.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Chen Lei supercy...@163.com 2010-03-09 08:09:40 EST --- Some comments: Obsoletes and Conflicts may be not needed, since ibus-table-additional do not exist in fedora. yum provides ibus-table-additional\* Loaded plugins: downloadonly, presto, refresh-packagekit No Matches found *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm4-firmware - Firmware for USB ADSL Modems based on Eagle IV Chipset
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-09 08:22:31 EST --- ueagle-atm4-firmware-1.0-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ueagle-atm4-firmware-1.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571790] New: Review Request: liboping - C library to generate ICMP echo requests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: liboping - C library to generate ICMP echo requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571790 Summary: Review Request: liboping - C library to generate ICMP echo requests Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkund...@v3.sk QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/liboping-1.3.4-1.fc12.src.rpm SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/liboping.spec koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2041387 Description: Liboping is a C library to generate ICMP echo requests, better known as ping packets. It is intended for use in network monitoring applications or applications that would otherwise need to fork ping(1) frequently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553533] Review Request: ibus-table-code - The code tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553533 --- Comment #8 from Chen Lei supercy...@163.com 2010-03-09 07:59:14 EST --- *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554239] Review Request: ibus-table-latin - The Latin tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554239 Chen Lei supercy...@163.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||supercy...@163.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|supercy...@163.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571790] Review Request: liboping - C library to generate ICMP echo requests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571790 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||541744 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm4-firmware - Firmware for USB ADSL Modems based on Eagle IV Chipset
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-09 07:59:19 EST --- ueagle-atm4-firmware-1.0-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ueagle-atm4-firmware-1.0-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553231] Review Request: ibus-table-cyrillic - Cyrillics tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553231 Chen Lei supercy...@163.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Chen Lei supercy...@163.com 2010-03-09 08:21:31 EST --- Empty %post should be removed from spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553231] Review Request: ibus-table-cyrillic - Cyrillics tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553231 Chen Lei supercy...@163.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||supercy...@163.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|supercy...@163.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554234] Review Request: ibus-table-yinma - The phonetic tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554234 Chen Lei supercy...@163.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||supercy...@163.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226484] Merge Review: telnet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226484
Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2010-03-09 08:15:48 EST ---
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review
[re...@localhost devel]$ rpmlint telnet.spec telnet*.rpm i386/*.rpm
telnet.spec: W: invalid-url Source2: telnet-client.tar.gz
telnet.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) login - loin, logic, lo gin
telnet.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Telnet
telnet.src: W: no-url-tag
telnet.src: W: invalid-url Source2: telnet-client.tar.gz
telnet-debuginfo.i386: W: no-url-tag
telnet-server.i386: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) login - loin, logic, lo
gin
telnet-server.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logins - losing,
loins, lo gins
telnet-server.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xinetd - dinette,
ninety, kinetic
telnet-server.i386: W: no-url-tag
telnet.i386: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) login - loin, logic, lo gin
telnet.i386: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Telnet
telnet.i386: W: no-url-tag
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings.
[re...@localhost devel]$ rpmlint --version
rpmlint version 0.94 Copyright (C) 1999-2007 Frederic Lepied, Mandriva
All W/E discussed previously, I'm ok with them.
Confirmed that URL is no longer available, could be probably
http://web.archive.org/web/20070819111735/www.hcs.harvard.edu/~dholland/computers/old-netkit.html
+ MUST: package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
Name doesn't match upstream tarball(netkit-telnet), but it's done this way for
a
long time and for consistency I would say it is better to keep it as it is.
Same is done in other distros as well.
+ MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
+ MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
+ MUST: The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines
+ MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual
license
0 MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
No such file in package.
+ MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
+ MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
+ MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task
From sources:
$ md5sum netkit-telnet-0.17.tar.gz
d6beabaaf53fe6e382c42ce3faa05a36 netkit-telnet-0.17.tar.gz
From upstream ftp:
$ md5sum netkit-telnet-0.17.tar.gz
d6beabaaf53fe6e382c42ce3faa05a36 netkit-telnet-0.17.tar.gz
= MATCHES
+ MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture
- tested on i686, no problems
0 MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch
+ MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines
0 MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro
0 MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
0 MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries
0 MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker
+ MUST: Package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create
that directory
+ MUST: Package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings
+ MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must
include a %defattr(...) line.
+ MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ MUST: Each package must consistently use macros
+ MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content
0 MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage
+ MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application
0 MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package
0 MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package
0 MUST: Packages
[Bug 566729] Review Request: CharLS - An optimized implementation of the JPEG-LS standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566729 --- Comment #9 from Mario Ceresa mrcer...@gmail.com 2010-03-09 08:49:04 EST --- Ok I keep forgetting about the F-13 branch: (thanks Peter for noticing!) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: CharLS Short Description: An optimized implementation of the JPEG-LS standard Owners: mrceresa Branches: F-11 F-12 F-13 EL-5 InitialCC: peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554239] Review Request: ibus-table-latin - The Latin tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554239 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|mschwe...@gmail.com | --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2010-03-09 08:36:03 EST --- Please do read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts in its entirety. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 --- Comment #17 from Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com 2010-03-09 09:47:17 EST --- Fixed issues in #comment 16 SPEC URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ArpON.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ArpON-1.90-5.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 --- Comment #17 from Liberty libe...@live.com 2010-03-09 10:30:26 EST --- Koji build of the new package: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2038695 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 Bug 451189 depends on bug 455713, which changed state. Bug 455713 Summary: remove suid from ping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455713 What|Old Value |New Value Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226484] Merge Review: telnet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226484 Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||telnet-0.17-47.fc14 Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com 2010-03-09 08:28:38 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) The only questionable thing is that maybe it would be good to ship webarchive URL and README file as %doc, not a blocker for me, though. Fixed in telnet-0.17-47.fc14. Package looks sane. Review+ Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562366] Review request: zinnia - online handwriting recognition system with machine learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562366 --- Comment #18 from Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com 2010-03-09 07:18:14 EST --- So I delete %check section. As I see, it is not necessary. Later I will put a newer SRPM file and SPEC file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551258] Review Request: libgcal - A library to access google calendar events and contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551258 --- Comment #9 from Mario Ceresa mrcer...@gmail.com 2010-03-09 09:25:58 EST --- Contacted upstream about libgcal.pc include path (Comment 6) http://code.google.com/p/libgcal/issues/detail?id=59 I'll wait for their answer before going on with the review. With best regards, Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm4-firmware - Firmware for USB ADSL Modems based on Eagle IV Chipset
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-09 08:10:48 EST --- ueagle-atm4-firmware-1.0-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ueagle-atm4-firmware-1.0-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 --- Comment #39 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-03-09 09:54:26 EST --- (In reply to comment #38) Thank you Paul. It looks like the: sendmail.x86_64: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/lib64/sasl2/Sendmail.conf can also be easily fixed. How do you propose to fix this? Surely not by removing the %config? I will wait for Paul's comments and than implement all these in rawhide. I hope to be able to take another look tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569893] Review Request: - perl-Net-STOMP-Client - STOMP object oriented client module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569893 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-09 07:11:34 EST --- perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.8-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.8-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569893] Review Request: - perl-Net-STOMP-Client - STOMP object oriented client module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569893 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-09 07:10:06 EST --- perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.8-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.8-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225877] Merge Review: guile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225877
--- Comment #1 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2010-03-09 10:19:17 EST ---
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review
[re...@localhost devel]$ rpmlint guile.spec guile*.rpm i386/guile-*.rpm
guile.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) extensibility - sensibility,
reprehensibility, comprehensibility
guile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GNU's - G Nu's, Gnu's,
GNP's
guile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US extensibility -
sensibility, reprehensibility, comprehensibility
guile-devel.i386: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) extensibility -
sensibility, reprehensibility, comprehensibility
guile-devel.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US extensibility -
sensibility, reprehensibility, comprehensibility
guile-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
guile.i386: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) extensibility - sensibility,
reprehensibility, comprehensibility
guile.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GNU's - G Nu's, Gnu's,
GNP's
guile.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US extensibility -
sensibility, reprehensibility, comprehensibility
guile.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-3.so
guile.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-60-v-2.so
guile.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-3.so
guile.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/libguilereadline-v-17.so
guile.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/guile/1.8/slib ../../slib
guile.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.so
guile.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm
guile.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 17 warnings.
[re...@localhost devel]$ rpmlint --version
rpmlint version 0.94 Copyright (C) 1999-2007 Frederic Lepied, Mandriva
Spelling errors are ok, .so files should go to devel, main package should
contain just the versioned libs.
Dangling symlink - /usr/share/guile/1.8/slib points to /usr/share/slib - which
is not owned by guile and doesn't exist if slib package doesn't exist. This
symlink is ghosted and triggers do create it, so it probably could be removed.
+ MUST: package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
+ MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
+ MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
+ MUST: The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines
+ MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual
license
Info documentation is licensed under OFSFDL (see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/OldFSFDocLicense ) , install-sh
scripts (. , ./build-aux/ ./guile-readline/install-sh) have BSD like license
(probably MIT).
+ MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
Included
+ MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
+ MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
+ MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task
$wget ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/guile/guile-1.8.7.tar.gz
--2010-03-09 16:07:33-- ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/guile/guile-1.8.7.tar.gz
= „guile-1.8.7.tar.gz.1“
Překládám ftp.gnu.org… 140.186.70.20
Navazuje se spojení s ftp.gnu.org|140.186.70.20|:21… spojeno.
Probíhá přihlašování jako anonymous… Přihlášeno!
== SYST ... hotovo. == PWD ... hotovo.
== TYPE I ... hotovo.== CWD (1) /pub/gnu/guile ... hotovo.
== SIZE guile-1.8.7.tar.gz ... 4026804
== PASV ... hotovo. == RETR guile-1.8.7.tar.gz ... hotovo.
Délka: 4026804 (3,8M) (není směrodatné)
100%[==] 4 026 804350K/s za 13s
2010-03-09 16:07:48 (296 KB/s) – „guile-1.8.7.tar.gz.1“ uložen [4026804]
[re...@localhost devel]$ md5sum guile-1.8.7.tar.gz*
991b5b3efcbbc3f7507d05bc42f80a5e guile-1.8.7.tar.gz
991b5b3efcbbc3f7507d05bc42f80a5e guile-1.8.7.tar.gz.1
= MATCHES
+ MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture
- tested on i686, no problems
0 MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch
+ MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines
0 MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro
+ MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
[Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 --- Comment #40 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com 2010-03-09 10:18:18 EST --- It looks like the sasl is scanning the /usr/lib64/sasl2 for config and than tries the /etc/sasl2. From the spec file it looks like as a long time when this behaviour was implemented so I think it should be safe to simple move the config file (also with some check for custom config in old location, maybe in %prep). I will test this behaviour and if OK I will implement it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225783
Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|needinfo?(nob...@fedoraproj |
|ect.org)|
--- Comment #25 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2010-03-09 10:51:20 EST ---
+ MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review
Sources used when checking (from Fedora CVS for F-13):
johanka:F-13$ md5sum gdb.spec gdb-7.0.90.20100306.tar.bz2
b0dadd6e0bf07f2d73ce87c53538edcc gdb.spec
9d52988c5b2a2085e0ee5df89393e5a0 gdb-7.0.90.20100306.tar.bz2
(plus 117 patches for which I haven't calculated md5sums)
johanka:F-13$ rpmlint -i gdb-7.0.90.20100306-20.fc13.src.rpm x86_64/gdb-*.rpm
gdb.src: W: strange-permission gdb-6.8-bz457187-largefile-test.patch 0775L
A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions.
Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions.
gdb.src: W: invalid-url Source4: libstdc++-v3-python-r155978.tar.bz2
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
gdb.src: W: invalid-url Source0: gdb-7.0.90.20100306.tar.bz2
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
gdb.x86_64: E: postin-without-ldconfig
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.pyo
This package contains a library and its %post scriptlet doesn't call ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.pyo
This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a
call to ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: postin-without-ldconfig
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.pyc
This package contains a library and its %post scriptlet doesn't call ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.pyc
This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a
call to ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: postin-without-ldconfig
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.pyo
This package contains a library and its %post scriptlet doesn't call ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.pyo
This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a
call to ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: postin-without-ldconfig
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.pyc
This package contains a library and its %post scriptlet doesn't call ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.pyc
This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a
call to ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: postin-without-ldconfig
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.py
This package contains a library and its %post scriptlet doesn't call ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.py
This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a
call to ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: postin-without-ldconfig
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.py
This package contains a library and its %post scriptlet doesn't call ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.py
This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a
call to ldconfig.
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 12 errors, 3 warnings.
johanka:F-13$
(for explanation of the above warnings see the previous comments here)
NO PROBLEM HERE
+ MUST: package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
+ MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
+ MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
Package far exceeds level of the Packaging Guidelines. (I would probably make
pearls like
! find -name *.rej # Should not happen.
more readable, but certainly whole spec is very correct).
+ MUST: The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines
- MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual
license
I went through whole gdb and found it to be incredible collection of all
possible licenses, so that my proposed License tag is
License: GPLv3+ and GFDL and GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ and GPLv3+ with exceptions and
LGPLv2+ and and GPL+ and Public Domain
(all on one line)
+ MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
+ MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
+ MUST: The spec file for the
[Bug 571816] New: Review Request: clamav-unofficial-sigs - Scripts to download unoffical clamav signatures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clamav-unofficial-sigs - Scripts to download unoffical clamav signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571816 Summary: Review Request: clamav-unofficial-sigs - Scripts to download unoffical clamav signatures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: and...@topdog.za.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/clamav-unofficial-sigs/clamav-unofficial-sigs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/clamav-unofficial-sigs/clamav-unofficial-sigs-3.7-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This package contains scripts and configuration files that provide the capability to download, test, and update the 3rd-party signature databases provide by Sanesecurity, SecuriteInfo, MalwarePatrol, OITC, INetMsg and ScamNailer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565502] Review Request: python-recaptcha-client - A plugin for reCAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA Mailhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565502 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #4 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com 2010-03-09 11:18:46 EST --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~sgallagh/packagereview/python-recaptcha-client.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~sgallagh/packagereview/python-recaptcha-client-1.0.5-0.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratch builds completed successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2041826 (Fedora 13) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2041845 (EPEL 5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #84 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2010-03-09 11:14:01 EST --- Hi, sorry for the delay, but I'm a little sick this days. As you can see, I've updated gluegen to build a package named gluegen-source. By doing this, I'm, now, able to build jogl without gluegen side by side and my spec now BuildRequires: gluegen-source. I've made a patch to point my build.xml to the correc (and new) location of gluegen. Despite the fact that my local copy of jogl builds ok, I'm having problems with my rpmbuild version: BUILD FAILED /home/lonely/rpmbuild/BUILD/jogl/make/build.xml:1562: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/lonely/rpmbuild/BUILD/jogl/make/build.xml:487: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/gluegen-source/gluegen/make/build.xml:458: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/gluegen-source/gluegen/make/build.xml:378: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/gluegen-source/gluegen/make/gluegen-cpptasks.xml:394: Problem: failed to create task or type compiler Cause: The name is undefined. Action: Check the spelling. Action: Check that any custom tasks/types have been declared. Action: Check that any presetdef/macrodef declarations have taken place. Total time: 4 seconds erro: Status de saída de /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.lV0Zq0 inválido (%build) That is weird... one version builds and another not. spec: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/2/jogl.spec srpm: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/2/fix-buildxml.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #85 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2010-03-09 11:23:42 EST --- Created an attachment (id=398837) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=398837) patch to correctly point build.xml This is a patch to correctly point build.xml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kahl e-u...@fsfe.org 2010-03-09 11:20:24 EST --- Bingo: I've managed to acquire an old PowerBook G4 at work and figured out it's SELinux ruining ccl's day on PPC machines ever since the default policy was changed to disallow mmap_zero by default. Either we wait for PPC support to vanish in Fedora Land, exclude PPC or I'll have to create ccl-selinux with a new type for the ccl kernel on PPC systems that allows for this specific access.. your opinion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|terje...@phys.ntnu.no Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 544295] Review Request: upower - Power management service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544295 --- Comment #17 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2010-03-09 11:37:32 EST --- Please set fedora-cvs flags to continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2010-03-09 11:35:25 EST --- o rpmlint clean o spec file looks fine o naming is fine o ownership/perms is correct o sha is good: $ sha1sum ArpON-1.90.tar.gz* 0a0dbfa6e7571892b39bcd25b91f14c840b01315 ArpON-1.90.tar.gz 0a0dbfa6e7571892b39bcd25b91f14c840b01315 ArpON-1.90.tar.gz.spec ! please download with e.g. wget -N to get correct time stamp on tarball. o license is BSD and set correct. o builds with correct flags: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2041933name=build.log o builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2041927 o man page included - Fix the time stamp when importing. The package ArpON is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #7 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2010-03-09 11:41:40 EST --- I sent a query off to Josh Boyer and then forgot about it. If it will help, I'll ping him again. It sounds like you have what you need, though. Do you know why ccl needs mmap_zero on PPC? That's kind of an odd thing to do. Since it doesn't seem to be needed on x86 platforms, perhaps it can be coded around somehow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225877] Merge Review: guile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225877 --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com 2010-03-09 11:39:35 EST --- Thanks for the review. I'll fix the License tag in the next commit. The .so files are actually modules used by guile, moving them to -devel package would break guile. The ghosts for slibcat and slib symlink were used to ensure that the files will be correctly removed when guile is upgraded to another major version (the location will change). They are created only when slib is installed, so it should always point to an existing directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 568428] Review Request: libldb - A schema-less, ldap like, API and database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568428 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225877] Merge Review: guile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225877 --- Comment #3 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2010-03-09 11:55:41 EST --- Ok, fine, thanks for explanation ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563844] Review Request: zim - A Desktop Wiki Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: pyzim - |Review Request: zim - A |Python reimplementation of |Desktop Wiki Editor |Zim by the author | --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-03-09 12:26:54 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) Hi Mamoru, Please take a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560967 Regards I have read the bug, however as Jussi and I already said on this bug, the new package is zim software with language being changed from perl to python, not more or less ( I know some other applications which changes the language they use, like C - python, ruby - perl, etc...) Also pyzim or python-zim is just wrong because this naming usually means that this package is some module of python (like pygtk2), while is actually one application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com 2010-03-09 12:23:34 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ArpON Short Description: ARP handler inspection Owners:sagarun Branches: F-12,F-13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #86 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2010-03-09 12:52:01 EST --- Solved. I'm able to build now: spec: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/3/jogl.spec srpm: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/3/jogl-1.1.1-3.fc12.src.rpm rpmlint has 5 complains: [lon...@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i686/jogl-* jogl.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Microsystems - Micro systems, Micro-systems, Ecosystems jogl.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjogl_awt.so jogl.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjogl.so jogl.i686: W: no-documentation jogl-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. I guess we should ignore this jogl.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Microsystems - Micro systems, Micro-systems, Ecosystems end this jogl.i686: W: no-documentation, but I don't know hot to fix the others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563844] Review Request: zim - A Desktop Wiki Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-03-09 12:49:47 EST --- Well, ./zim/_lib/xdot.py is actually under LGPLv3+, not under GPLv3+, sorry... For -3: * Scriptlets https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets - Please fix scriptlets for update-desktop-database, update-mime-database ( currently with Fedora guidelines, only gtk-update-icon-cache has 3 sections for scriptlets ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546020] Review Request: php-swift-Swift - Free Feature-rich PHP Mailer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546020 Bug 546020 depends on bug 544660, which changed state. Bug 544660 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-swift - Adds swift mailer project channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544660 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA --- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-09 12:57:37 EST --- I apologize, I forgot about this review, I will try to get this done today or tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(mc...@redhat.com) --- Comment #27 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com 2010-03-09 13:21:03 EST --- (In reply to comment #26) suggested fix for License: field +License: GPLv3+ and GFDL and GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ and GPLv3+ with exceptions and LGPLv2+ and GPL+ and Public Domain (a) There is duplicate GPLv3+. I wrote in PkgWrangler also GPLv3 but I cannot find any such licensed file now. (b) Where have you found GPL+? Thanks for all the work! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #87 from Sylvestre Ledru sylvestre.le...@scilab.org 2010-03-09 13:24:11 EST --- I don't think the soname missing is really an issue since .so should never be called directly. Only called through Java. About the debuginfo without sources, I am not familiar with fedora but I am pretty sure you should copy the native source (C) into a dedicated package into a directory where gdb can find them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630
--- Comment #88 from James Heather j.heat...@surrey.ac.uk 2010-03-09 13:42:01
EST ---
(In reply to comment #86)
jogl.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjogl_awt.so
jogl.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjogl.so
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Packaging_JAR_files_that_use_JNI
Looks like the .so files need to go into %{_libdir}/%{name}. I suspect that
will get rid of the warning; but it needs doing either way.
Good work--this looks like it's coming along nicely.
James
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-03-09 14:13:30 EST --- You need not reopen the bug for CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561448] Review Request: jffi - Java Foreign Function Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561448
--- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-03-09
14:26:53 EST ---
I will review your newest srpm later, however just a note
(In reply to comment #7)
I'm having trouble getting it to build in a ppc mock / koji environment in the
first place. The link to your koji build doesn't seem available
- koji scratch build results will be deleted in about one week...
and when I goto run either
koji build --scratch --arch-override ppc64 dist-f14 jffi-0.6.5-3.fc12.src.rpm
or
su - build -c mock -r fedora-devel-ppc /tmp/jffi-0.6.5-3.fc12.src.rpm
Neither is successful. In the case of Koji, I get
BuildError: No matching arches were found
- ppc{,64} is available only on F-12/11 (not on F-13/14)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 536718] Review Request: tlomt-sniglet-fonts - A rounded, sans-serif font useful for headlines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536718 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-09 14:40:11 EST --- tlomt-sniglet-fonts-1.000-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tlomt-sniglet-fonts-1.000-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 536718] Review Request: tlomt-sniglet-fonts - A rounded, sans-serif font useful for headlines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536718 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-09 14:40:00 EST --- tlomt-sniglet-fonts-1.000-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tlomt-sniglet-fonts-1.000-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 536718] Review Request: tlomt-sniglet-fonts - A rounded, sans-serif font useful for headlines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536718 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-09 14:40:06 EST --- tlomt-sniglet-fonts-1.000-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tlomt-sniglet-fonts-1.000-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562847] Review Request: bfa-firmware - Brocade Fibre Channel HBA Firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562847 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-09 15:10:03 EST --- bfa-firmware-2.1.2.1-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bfa-firmware-2.1.2.1-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562847] Review Request: bfa-firmware - Brocade Fibre Channel HBA Firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562847 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-09 15:09:58 EST --- bfa-firmware-2.1.2.1-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bfa-firmware-2.1.2.1-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562847] Review Request: bfa-firmware - Brocade Fibre Channel HBA Firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562847 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-09 15:10:08 EST --- bfa-firmware-2.1.2.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bfa-firmware-2.1.2.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225622
Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.kratoch...@redhat.com
--- Comment #38 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com 2010-03-09
15:17:01 EST ---
obsoleted:
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
Missing %{?_isa} tags for multilib installations:
{,Build}Requires: *-devel - {,Build}Requires: *-devel%{?_isa}
(sure gettext flex bison etc. dependencies should be without %{?_isa})
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ArchSpecificRequires
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571993] New: Review Request: non-sequencer - A powerful, real-time, pattern-based MIDI sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: non-sequencer - A powerful, real-time, pattern-based MIDI sequencer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571993 Summary: Review Request: non-sequencer - A powerful, real-time, pattern-based MIDI sequencer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bl...@verdurin.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/reviews/non-sequencer/non-sequencer.spec SRPM URL: http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/reviews/non-sequencer/non-sequencer-0.0-1.20100131gitba94d2c354145.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Non Sequencer is a powerful real-time, pattern-based MIDI sequencer for Linux-released under the GPL. Filling the void left by countless DAWs, piano-roll editors, and other purely performance based solutions, it is a composition tool-one that transforms MIDI music-making on Linux from a complex nightmare into a pleasurable, efficient, and streamlined process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #95 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2010-03-09 18:17:09 EST --- (In reply to comment #93) rpmlint -a | grep debuginfo-without-sources returns nothing (and I do have quite a number of debuginfo packages installed), so I suspect that one is a problem. Should it be the same case? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545039#c9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567348] Review Request: dreampie - A graphical cross-platform interactive Python shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567348 Mads Kiilerich m...@kiilerich.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@kiilerich.com, ||methe...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Mads Kiilerich m...@kiilerich.com 2010-03-09 20:40:26 EST --- I was working on a package too, but didn't consider it ready for Fedora yet. I was working with upstream while this was submitted without contacting or following upstream. That's a stupid waste of work. Some of my work and review got upstreamed, but please take what you can use from the spec at http://bitbucket.org/kiilerix/dreampie-rpm/src/tip/dreampie.spec - though there isn't much to take except these comments: I would say that one file as LGPLv2+ (which is compatible with and thus relicensable to GPLv3) isn't worth mentioning in the license field. And there are other files with other compatible licenses. Group: It is not a lib but more like Development/Tools The package requires pygtk2-libglade, not just pygtk2 Man pages should be %doc And finally and the reason I got stalled: I think the use of zip files is a show-stopper. It is a ugly hack and doesn't give the transparency we like in Fedora packaging. The py2 files should be installed as plain py files, and the py3 files moved to a py3 subpackage on the archs where it is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554239] Review Request: ibus-table-latin - The Latin tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554239 --- Comment #5 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2010-03-09 22:57:39 EST --- Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-latin.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-latin-1.2.0.20100305-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Latin tables for IBus-Table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556346] Review Request: stage - A 2.5D multi-robot simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556346 --- Comment #13 from Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com 2010-03-09 23:33:41 EST --- I tested all of the included .world files, the uoa_robotics_lab.world file is the only one that exhibits this particular behavior. There are a few other .world files that don't work as well, but for the most part none of them are causing segfaults. I've removed the offending world files for now, while the bug is tracked down. Here's the new SRPM and spec reflecting the changes: Spec URL: http://www.richmattes.com/rpms/stage/stage.spec SRPM URL: http://www.richmattes.com/rpms/stage/stage-3.2.2-5.fc12.src.rpm koji dist-f13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2043084 rpmlint: $ rpmlint stage.spec ../RPMS/i686/stage* ../RPMS/noarch/stage* ../SRPMS/stage* stage.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multi - mulch, mufti stage.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable - salable, scalawag, scalar stage.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libstage.so.3.2.2 e...@glibc_2.0 stage-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libstage - lib stage, lib-stage, multistage stage-devel.i686: W: no-documentation stage-playerplugin.i686: W: no-documentation stage.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multi - mulch, mufti stage.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable - salable, scalawag, scalar 6 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556346] Review Request: stage - A 2.5D multi-robot simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556346 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #14 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2010-03-10 00:22:49 EST --- MUSTFIX: Building doesn't honor CFLAGS: From build.log: ... cd /builddir/build/BUILD/Stage-3.2.2-Source/libstage /usr/lib64/ccache/c++ -Dstage_EXPORTS -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -O3 -DNDEBUG -Wall -fPIC -I/builddir/build/BUILD/Stage-3.2.2-Source/. -I/builddir/build/BUILD/Stage-3.2.2-Source/libstage -I/builddir/build/BUILD/Stage-3.2.2-Source/replace -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/Stage-3.2.2-Source -I/usr/include/freetype2 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -o CMakeFiles/stage.dir/block.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/Stage-3.2.2-Source/libstage/block.cc Note there is a -O3 overriding the -O2 from RPM_OPT_FLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562366] Review request: zinnia - online handwriting recognition system with machine learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562366
--- Comment #20 from Chen Lei supercy...@163.com 2010-03-10 00:53:17 EST ---
rpmlint *
zinnia.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C online handwriting recognition system
with machine learning-
Online handwriting recognition system with machine learning
zinnia.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US customizable -
customization, customize, customarily
zinnia.src: W: non-coherent-filename zinnia-0.05-3.fc14.src.rpm
zinnia-0.05-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm-
zinnia.src: W: strange-permission zinnia-0.05.tar.gz 0777L
zinnia.src: W: strange-permission zinnia-0.05-bindings.patch 0777L
zinnia.src: W: strange-permission zinnia.spec 0777L-
chmod 644
zinnia.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C online handwriting recognition
system with machine learning
zinnia.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US customizable -
customization, customize, customarily
zinnia.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libzinnia.so.0.0.0
e...@glibc_2.2.5
zinnia.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zinnia-0.05/ChangeLog
-
in %prep
find . -type f -name ChangeLog -size 0c -exec rm -f {} ';'
zinnia-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
zinnia-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/zinnia-doc-0.05/doc/zinnia.css-
In %prep
sed -i 's/\r//' doc/zinnia.css
zinnia-perl.x86_64: W: no-documentation
zinnia-perl.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/perl5/auto/zinnia/zinnia.so 0555L-
chmod 755
zinnia-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation
zinnia-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/zinnia
['/usr/lib64']
zinnia-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/zinnia_convert
['/usr/lib64']
zinnia-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/zinnia_learn
['/usr/lib64']
-
After %configure
sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=|g' libtool
sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool
zinnia-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation
8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 14 warnings.
I recommend the following changes:
#%{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib())}
#%{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1))}
%if ! (0%{?fedora} 12 || 0%{?rhel} 5)
%{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib()))}
%{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib(1)))}
%endif
-
%if ! (0%{?fedora} 12 || 0%{?rhel} 5)
%{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib()))}
%{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib(1)))}
%endif
rm -f python/%{name}.pyc
-
find . -type f -name *.pyc -exec rm -f {} ';'
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.la
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{perl_vendorarch}/auto/%{name}/%{name}.bs
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{perl_vendorarch}/auto/%{name}/.packlist
-
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name *.la -exec rm -f {} ';'
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name *.bs -size 0c -exec rm -f {} ';'
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
Note:.bs file is useful if it's not a empty file
%description utils
The %{name}-utils package provide utils for zinnia library that
use %{name}.
-
%description utils
The %{name}-utils package provides utilities for zinnia library that
use %{name}.
python setup.py install --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
%{__python} setup.py install --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Note: Choose %{__python} or python, not use both
CFLAGS=%{optflags}
-
CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS
Note: Choose %{optflags} or $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, not use both
%doc doc
-%doc doc/*
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546451] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Template-IT - Simple template API.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546451 --- Comment #9 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2010-03-10 01:07:10 EST --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554234] Review Request: ibus-table-yinma - The phonetic tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554234 --- Comment #17 from Ding-Yi Chen dc...@redhat.com 2010-03-10 01:34:33 EST --- rpmlint output that you should fixed: ./SRPMS/ibus-table-yinma-1.2.0.20100305-5.fc12.src.rpm ibus-table-yinma.src:15: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ibus-table-yong ibus-table-yinma.src:15: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ibus-table-erbi Use the similar fix that I use in ibus-table-xingma. ibus-table-yinma.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.0.20100111-5 ['1.2.0.20100305-5.fc12', '1.2.0.20100305-5'] Update the change log version to: 1.2.0.20100305-5 ibus-table-yinma.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided ibus-table-yong ibus-table-yinma.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided ibus-table-erbi Use the similar fix that I use in ibus-table-xingma. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561235] Review Request: phpesp - PHP-based survey web application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561235 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-10 01:41:18 EST --- phpesp-2.1.1-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update phpesp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpesp-2.1.1-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570113] Review Request: rubygem-right_aws - Interface classes for Amazon EC2/EBS, SQS, S3, SDB and ACF
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570113 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-10 01:42:36 EST --- rubygem-right_aws-1.10.0-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-right_aws'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-right_aws-1.10.0-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570111] Review Request: rubygem-right_http_connection - RightScale's HTTP/S module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570111 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-10 01:39:34 EST --- rubygem-right_aws-1.10.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-right_aws'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-right_aws-1.10.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567107] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLGlue - Add/extend SSL support for common perl modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567107 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Net-SSLGlue-0.2-1.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569893] Review Request: - perl-Net-STOMP-Client - STOMP object oriented client module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569893 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-10 01:42:52 EST --- perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.8-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Net-STOMP-Client'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.8-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-10 01:46:23 EST --- kasumi-2.5-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543917] Review Request: check_postgres - PostgreSQL monitoring script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543917 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-10 01:44:27 EST --- check_postgres-2.14.2-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #63 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-10 01:47:21 EST --- kde-plasma-translatoid-1.1.90_20100122svn-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571416] Review Request: GiGi-0.6.0 - C++ OpenGL GUI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571416 --- Comment #2 from Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com 2010-03-10 01:46:12 EST --- ok, I've managed to build on F13 successfully now: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2041817 I'll post the updated spec srpm once I'll verify that FreeOrion compiles and runs with new version (may take a while ...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.1.90_20100122svn-1.fc11 |kde-plasma-translatoid-1.1. ||90_20100122svn-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567107] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLGlue - Add/extend SSL support for common perl modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567107 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-10 01:53:10 EST --- perl-Net-SSLGlue-0.2-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543917] Review Request: check_postgres - PostgreSQL monitoring script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543917 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|check_postgres-2.14.2-1.fc1 |check_postgres-2.14.2-1.fc1 |2 |3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543917] Review Request: check_postgres - PostgreSQL monitoring script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543917 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|check_postgres-2.14.2-1.fc1 |check_postgres-2.14.2-1.fc1 |3 |1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567107] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLGlue - Add/extend SSL support for common perl modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567107 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Net-SSLGlue-0.2-1.fc13 |perl-Net-SSLGlue-0.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
