[Bug 549821] Review Request: dcap - Client Tools for dCache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549821 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Steve Traylen 2010-03-12 02:47:49 EST --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565376] Review Request: qstardict - StarDict clone written in Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565376 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-12 02:34:25 EST --- qstardict-0.13.1-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qstardict-0.13.1-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565830] Review Request: paktype-naskh-basic-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565830 --- Comment #10 from Naveen Kumar 2010-03-12 01:05:59 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) > - package name should be paktype-naskh-fonts not nashk Updated Spec & SRPM: SPEC: http://nkumar.fedorapeople.org/paktype-naskh-basic-fonts/paktype-naskh-basic-fonts-3.0-5.fc12/paktype-naskh-basic-fonts.spec SRPM: http://nkumar.fedorapeople.org/paktype-naskh-basic-fonts/paktype-naskh-basic-fonts-3.0-5.fc12/paktype-naskh-basic-fonts-3.0-5.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2048177 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565376] Review Request: qstardict - StarDict clone written in Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565376 Cheese Lee changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Cheese Lee 2010-03-12 01:02:41 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: qstardict Owners: cheeselee Updated Description: StarDict clone written using Qt4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563844] Review Request: zim - A Desktop Wiki Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 --- Comment #14 from Cheese Lee 2010-03-12 00:37:10 EST --- - Relied on the upstream ./setup.py script to install hicolor theme icons, zim-setup.patch updated - Added xdg-utils as build requirement - Removed shebangs in some unexecutable scripts - Removed an empty file Spec URL: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/612778/zim.spec SRPM URL: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/612778/zim-0.44-5.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565830] Review Request: paktype-naskh-basic-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565830 Pravin Satpute changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |paktype-nashk-basic-fonts - |paktype-naskh-basic-fonts - |Fonts for Arabic from |Fonts for Arabic from |PakType |PakType --- Comment #9 from Pravin Satpute 2010-03-11 23:55:47 EST --- - package name should be paktype-naskh-fonts not nashk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567733] Review Request: marave - A Simple text editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567733 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|marave-0.7-3.fc11 |marave-0.7-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556216] Review Request: bangarang - A media player for the KDE SC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556216 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 23:30:17 EST --- bangarang-1.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556216] Review Request: bangarang - A media player for the KDE SC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556216 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|bangarang-1.0-2.fc12|bangarang-1.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556216] Review Request: bangarang - A media player for the KDE SC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556216 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|bangarang-1.0-2.fc13|bangarang-1.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562366] Review request: zinnia - online handwriting recognition system with machine learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562366 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 23:29:48 EST --- zinnia-0.05-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update zinnia'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zinnia-0.05-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565616] Review Request: libeina - Data Type Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565616 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libeina-0.9.9.063-6.fc12|libeina-0.9.9.063-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556216] Review Request: bangarang - A media player for the KDE SC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556216 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 23:30:45 EST --- bangarang-1.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565616] Review Request: libeina - Data Type Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565616 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 23:30:29 EST --- libeina-0.9.9.063-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567733] Review Request: marave - A Simple text editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567733 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 23:30:00 EST --- marave-0.7-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562366] Review request: zinnia - online handwriting recognition system with machine learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562366 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 23:28:23 EST --- zinnia-0.05-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update zinnia'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zinnia-0.05-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567733] Review Request: marave - A Simple text editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567733 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|marave-0.7-3.fc13 |marave-0.7-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563820] Review Request: globus-libxml2 - Globus Toolkit - LibXML2 Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563820 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 23:25:54 EST --- globus-libxml2-1.8-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565616] Review Request: libeina - Data Type Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565616 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libeina-0.9.9.063-6.fc13|libeina-0.9.9.063-6.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565616] Review Request: libeina - Data Type Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565616 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 23:25:18 EST --- libeina-0.9.9.063-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567733] Review Request: marave - A Simple text editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567733 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 23:26:29 EST --- marave-0.7-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563820] Review Request: globus-libxml2 - Globus Toolkit - LibXML2 Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563820 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|globus-libxml2-1.8-1.fc11 |globus-libxml2-1.8-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563820] Review Request: globus-libxml2 - Globus Toolkit - LibXML2 Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563820 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|globus-libxml2-1.8-1.fc13 |globus-libxml2-1.8-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563820] Review Request: globus-libxml2 - Globus Toolkit - LibXML2 Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563820 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 23:20:59 EST --- globus-libxml2-1.8-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562366] Review request: zinnia - online handwriting recognition system with machine learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562366 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 23:18:15 EST --- zinnia-0.05-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update zinnia'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zinnia-0.05-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554234] Review Request: ibus-table-yinma - The phonetic tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554234 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-03-11 23:11:57 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ibus-table-yinma Short Description: The phonetic tables for IBus-Table Owners: kaio Branches: F-13 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554234] Review Request: ibus-table-yinma - The phonetic tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554234
Ding-Yi Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|dc...@redhat.com|nob...@fedoraproject.org
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #19 from Ding-Yi Chen 2010-03-11 23:08:28 EST ---
MUST:
+ rpmlint output is acceptable.
Note: Since there is no zh-* spelling-checker, the spelling warning
on these languages can be omitted.
+ Package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ Package meets licensing guidelines, and match the source license.
+ Source files match upstream.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ BuildRoot is proper.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ Requires are proper.
+ %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
+ %clean contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
+ %doc files present.
+ %doc files do not interfere runtime application.
+ Macros are consistently used.
+ Package builds in koji.
+ Package contains code or permissible content.
+ Package installed properly.
+ Not relocatable, unless proper justification is presented.
+ %files section must include a %defattr(...) line, and file permissions are
correct.
+ No duplication in %files
+ File names are in valid UTF-8.
+ Own all directory it creates.
+ Files or directories are not owned by other packages.
SHOULD:
+ License text are in separate files.
+ Translations for supported non-English languages if available.
+ Package build in mock.
+ Package can build in all supported architectures.
+ Package runs properly.
+ Scriptlets are sane.
+ No direct files dependencies, unless they are in either /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523877] Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 --- Comment #20 from Chen Lei 2010-03-11 23:02:57 EST --- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > I find that CBFlib tarball bundled some external python modules(dREL-ply, > > PyCifRW, ply), maybe we should remove and package those modules separately. > > > I'm not bothering with any of the python stuff with cbflib, and I don't plan > to > unless there is a strong demand/need for it (which I don't forsee). OK, but I still recommand you split -doc and -utils subpackage. CBFlib has a lot of documentation in it and both doc and html_graphics dirs need to be included in -doc subpackage. Also, The gpl.txt should not move out of doc dir, grep gpl\.txt CBFlib.html CBFlib.html:YOU MAY REDISTRIBUTE THE CBFLIB PACKAGE UNDER THE TERMS OF THE GPL. grep \.jpg index.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561086] Review Request: perl-String-Escape - String::Escape Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561086 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-String-Escape-2010.002 ||-3.el5 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516528] Review Request: globus-gram-client-tools - Globus Toolkit - Job Management Tools (globusrun)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516528 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|globus-gram-client-tools-7. |globus-gram-client-tools-7. |3-1.fc12|3-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565811] Review Request: rubygem-rest-client - Simple REST client for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565811 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-rest-client-1.3.1-5 |rubygem-rest-client-1.3.1-5 |.fc11 |.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516528] Review Request: globus-gram-client-tools - Globus Toolkit - Job Management Tools (globusrun)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516528 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 22:39:54 EST --- globus-gram-client-tools-7.3-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516528] Review Request: globus-gram-client-tools - Globus Toolkit - Job Management Tools (globusrun)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516528 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 22:40:35 EST --- globus-gram-client-tools-7.3-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 533753] Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533753 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.4.2-2.fc12|python-pep8-0.4.2-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 533753] Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533753 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 22:39:09 EST --- python-pep8-0.4.2-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565811] Review Request: rubygem-rest-client - Simple REST client for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565811 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 22:39:39 EST --- rubygem-rest-client-1.3.1-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516528] Review Request: globus-gram-client-tools - Globus Toolkit - Job Management Tools (globusrun)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516528 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|globus-gram-client-tools-7. |globus-gram-client-tools-7. |3-1.el5 |3-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561086] Review Request: perl-String-Escape - String::Escape Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561086 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 22:40:08 EST --- perl-String-Escape-2010.002-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 --- Comment #3 from Peng Wu 2010-03-11 21:42:15 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) > The model file(SOURCE1) maybe come from Zinnia-Tomoe package, model can be > compiled from model.txt file. Hi Chen Lei, Thanks for informing me this. Would you like to co-maintain this package? The updated srpm and spec is here: Spec URL: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ime/ibus-handwrite.spec SRPM URL: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ime/ibus-handwrite-1.2.0.20100205-2.fc12.src.rpm The changes are: 1. Use textual format of model data in zinnia-tomoe tar ball instead of binary format file. (The model data need to be copied to ibus-handwrite data sub-directory in order to let ibus-handwrite use the generated model data.) 2. Bump the release to 2. Please review the new package and spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523877] Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 --- Comment #19 from Tim Fenn 2010-03-11 21:34:29 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) > I find that CBFlib tarball bundled some external python modules(dREL-ply, > PyCifRW, ply), maybe we should remove and package those modules separately. > I'm not bothering with any of the python stuff with cbflib, and I don't plan to unless there is a strong demand/need for it (which I don't forsee). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530251] Review Request: gearbox - A collection of usable peer-reviewed robotics-related libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530251
--- Comment #16 from Rich Mattes 2010-03-11 20:20:52 EST
---
I fixed the DSO problems, corrected the Sourceforge URL, and added the missing
ice-devel dependency. I removed the superfluous java BuildRequires as well, it
isn't needed. I also got rid of the -ice subpackage, and applied the
conditionals to the cmake line as you suggested. The directory ownership of
%{_libdir} has been fixed as well. As far as rpath, it looks like the %cmake
macro in F13 no longer includes "-DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON" which is probably
why I didn't run into that issue on my F12 machine. I added it to my list of
cmake switches in the spec file to ensure it's always included during the
build.
Spec URL: http://www.richmattes.com/rpms/gearbox/gearbox.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.richmattes.com/rpms/gearbox/gearbox-9.11-5.fc12.src.rpm
koji:
dist-f12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2048002
dist-f13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2048013
rpmlint:
$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/gearbox-9.11-5.fc12.src.rpm ../RPMS/i686/gearbox*
gearbox.spec
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569893] Review Request: - perl-Net-STOMP-Client - STOMP object oriented client module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569893 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 19:04:28 EST --- perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.8-2.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Net-STOMP-Client'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.8-2.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569893] Review Request: - perl-Net-STOMP-Client - STOMP object oriented client module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569893 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 19:05:18 EST --- perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.8-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Net-STOMP-Client'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.8-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549821] Review Request: dcap - Client Tools for dCache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549821 --- Comment #8 from Mattias Ellert 2010-03-11 17:22:05 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) > but > dist-f14 build fails > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2047198 > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.UnbB6j: line 32: aclocal: command not found > RPM build errors: > > autotools needs adding. Duh! Me bad. New version here: Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/dcap.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/dcap-2.44.0-3.fc12.src.rpm It was a good thing doing a dist-f14 scratch build. It revealed some issues in configure.ac due to the new default behaviour of the linker. I have patched for this new issue in the new version and submitted the patch upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549821] Review Request: dcap - Client Tools for dCache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549821 --- Comment #9 from Mattias Ellert 2010-03-11 17:23:37 EST --- Should have mentioned my own dist-f14 successful scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2047494 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567348] Review Request: dreampie - A graphical cross-platform interactive Python shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567348 --- Comment #6 from Ionuț Arțăriși 2010-03-11 16:09:19 EST --- Ok, then I'll keep working on this package, here are the new files: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/dreampie/dreampie.spec http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/dreampie/dreampie-1.0.2-2.fc12.src.rpm * Thu Mar 11 2010 Ionuț C. Arțăriși - 1.0.2-2 - changed group to Development/Tools - marked manpages as %%doc - added pygtk2-libglade dependency - added more license fields: BSD, ASL, Python and Copyright only I talked to tibbs and spot on #fedora-devel and cleared out the licensing issue. The right License tag is the really long and complicated one. One of the motivations for this is that any of those files can be taken and used separately after the package has been installed on a fedora system. FYI, the kernel license is probably explained by the fact that the multiple licensed code is compiled together which is not the issue with python programs. There's more on that here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#Multiple_licensing_situations spot interpreted the "whatever you want" license as "Copyright only" so I added that too. I haven't done anything in the spec about the zip files issue yet. I'm going to upstream's mailing list after I finish writing this comment. > If python3 is a build dependency (in fedora versions where it is available) > then it _is_ installed. Users who want py3 should install py3 packages. I'm not sure what you're saying here. If python3 is a build dependency then it's installed on the build machine, not on the user's machine. Anyway I've thought about this a bit more and I agree. There should be a py3 sub-package which depends on the main package. The rationale that I was getting caught in before was that dreampie running a python3 interpreter still runs on python2 itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546451] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Template-IT - Simple template API.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546451 --- Comment #10 from David Hannequin 2010-03-11 15:33:08 EST --- Hello, New files : Spec URL: http://hvad.fedorapeople.org/fedora/php-pear-HTML-Template-IT/php-pear-HTML-Template-IT.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.fedorapeople.org/fedora/php-pear-HTML-Template-IT/php-pear-HTML-Template-IT-1.2.1-6.fc12.src.rpm Best regard ps : sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 15:33:00 EST --- pidgin-sipe-1.9.0-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-sipe-1.9.0-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #52 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 15:33:07 EST --- pidgin-sipe-1.9.0-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-sipe-1.9.0-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 15:33:13 EST --- pidgin-sipe-1.9.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-sipe-1.9.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571282] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-LeakChecker - Debug memory leaks in Catalyst applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571282
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|steve.tray...@cern.ch
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2010-03-11 15:28:46
EST ---
Review: perl-CatalystX-LeakChecker-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm
Date: March 11th 2010
Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2047403
* PASS: rpmlint output
rpmlint SRPMS/perl-CatalystX-LeakChecker-0.05-1.fc14.src.rpm \
SPECS/perl-CatalystX-LeakChecker.spec \
RPMS/noarch/perl-CatalystX-LeakChecker-0.05-1.fc14.noarch.rpm \
RPMS/noarch/perl-CatalystX-LeakChecker-tests-0.05-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
perl-CatalystX-LeakChecker-tests.noarch: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
* PASS: Named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
* PASS: spec file name same as base package %{name}.
* PASS: Packaging Guidelines.
* PASS: Approved license in .spec file.
GPL & Artist.
* PASS: License on Source code.
* PASS: Include LICENSE file or similar if it exist.
LICENSE include.
* PASS: Written in American English.
* PASS: Spec file legible.
* PASS: Included source must match upstream source.
c6227507da51072f2ef34ea164346bf3 CatalystX-LeakChecker-0.05.tar.gz
c6227507da51072f2ef34ea164346bf3 ../SOURCES/CatalystX-LeakChecker-0.05.tar.gz
* PASS: Build on one architecture.
* PASS: Not building on an architecture must highlighted.
is no arch.
* PASS: Build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
* PASS: Handle locales properly.
No locales.
* PASS: ldconfig must be called on shared libs.
No libs
* PASS: No bundled copies of system libraries.
* PASS: Package must state why relocatable if relocatable.
Not relocatable.
* PASS: A package must own all directories that it creates
* PASS: No duplicate files in %files listings.
* PASS: Permissions on files must be set properly. %defattr
* PASS: %clean section contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
* PASS: Each package must consistently use macros.
* PASS: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
* PASS: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
No large docs.
* PASS: %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
* PASS: Header files must be in a -devel package.
No headers.
* PASS: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
No statics.
* PASS: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
* PASS: Then library files that end in .so
(without suffix) must go in a -devel package.
* PASS: devel packages must require the exact base package
* PASS: No .la libtool archives
* PASS: GUI apps should have %{name}.desktop file
* PASS: No files or directories already owned by other packages.
* PASS: %install must run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
* PASS: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
Just one question What is
'%{?perl_ext_env_unset}'
on my system it is unset.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558544] Review Request: gdisk - An fdisk-like partitioning tool for GPT disks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558544 Terje Røsten changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Terje Røsten 2010-03-11 15:18:06 EST --- Imported, built and pushed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530251] Review Request: gearbox - A collection of usable peer-reviewed robotics-related libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530251
--- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-03-11
15:05:52 EST ---
Some initial remarks for 9.11-4
* SourceURL
- For sourceforge hosted tarball, please follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net
* Build failure
- Due to DSOlinkage change on F-13, your srpm does not build
on F-13:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2046939
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange
You can check this behavior on F-12 by adding
---
export LDFLAGS="-Wl,--no-add-needed"
---
before %cmake line.
* Dependency for -devel subpackage
- "Requires: pkgconfig" is no longer needed (now rpmbuild automatically
detects this dependency)
- Some header files have dependency for ice-devel
For example, ./gbxsickacfr/gbxiceutilacfr/buffer.h has
---
17 #include
18 #include
19 #include
---
So gearbox-devel should have "Requires: ice-devel".
* ppc64 switch
- Maybe following is simpler:
---
%cmake -DENABLE_LIB_BASICEXAMPLE=OFF -DENABLE_LIB_GBXUTILACFR=ON ... \
%ifarch ppc64
-DENABLE_LIB_GBXSICKACFR=OFF \
%else
-DENABLE_LIB_GBXSICKACFR=ON \
%endif
.
---
* -ice subpackage splitting
- Currently this makes no gain.
---
# env LANG=C rpm -ivh --test gearbox-9.11-4.1.fc13.i686.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libGbxIceUtilAcfr.so.1.0.0 is needed by gearbox-9.11-4.1.fc13.i686
---
* Directory ownership issue
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories#Common_Mistakes
- Currently the following directories are not owned by
any packages.
---
%{_libdir}/%{name}
---
* rpath
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath
---
$ rpmlint gearbox | grep rpath
gearbox.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/libflexiport.so.1.0.0
['/usr/lib']
gearbox.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib/libGbxGarminAcfr.so.1.0.0 ['/usr/lib']
gearbox.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/libGbxUtilAcfr.so.1.0.0
['/usr/lib']
gearbox.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib/libGbxNovatelAcfr.so.1.0.0 ['/usr/lib']
gearbox.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib/libGbxSmartBatteryAcfr.so.1.0.0 ['/usr/lib']
gearbox.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/libhokuyo_aist.so.1.0.0
['/usr/lib']
gearbox.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib/libGbxSerialAcfr.so.1.0.0 ['/usr/lib']
gearbox.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib/libGbxSerialDeviceAcfr.so.1.0.0 ['/usr/lib']
gearbox.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib/libGbxLockFileAcfr.so.1.0.0 ['/usr/lib']
gearbox.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib/libGbxNovatelUtilAcfr.so.1.0.0 ['/usr/lib']
---
- Please remove these rpaths.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221 --- Comment #20 from Darryl L. Pierce 2010-03-11 14:51:51 EST --- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > I don't see an ovirt-node package in Rawhide. What's the state of all this? > > > > We'll have a build ready to go out soon. Correction: we will have a build available as soon as some project steering decisions are made. I would recommend emailing ovirt-de...@redhat.com to plug into any discussions around releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221 --- Comment #19 from Darryl L. Pierce 2010-03-11 14:39:28 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) > I don't see an ovirt-node package in Rawhide. What's the state of all this? > We'll have a build ready to go out soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565502] Review Request: python-recaptcha-client - A plugin for reCAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA Mailhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565502 --- Comment #11 from Dave Malcolm 2010-03-11 14:38:49 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) > Somehow this review was never assigned to anyone. Please take review tickets > when you intend to review them. My bad; sorry about that -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 517338] Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-03-11 14:29:38 EST --- Clearing the fedora-cvs flag since this review still has a ways to go yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-03-11 14:24:28 EST --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565502] Review Request: python-recaptcha-client - A plugin for reCAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA Mailhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565502 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dmalc...@redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-03-11 14:28:01 EST --- Somehow this review was never assigned to anyone. Please take review tickets when you intend to review them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558544] Review Request: gdisk - An fdisk-like partitioning tool for GPT disks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558544 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-03-11 14:24:59 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565502] Review Request: python-recaptcha-client - A plugin for reCAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA Mailhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565502 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-03-11 14:28:47 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221 Matthew Miller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mat...@mattdm.org --- Comment #18 from Matthew Miller 2010-03-11 14:17:22 EST --- I don't see an ovirt-node package in Rawhide. What's the state of all this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549821] Review Request: dcap - Client Tools for dCache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549821 --- Comment #7 from Steve Traylen 2010-03-11 14:17:30 EST --- diff --brief -r dcap-2.44.0 ../SPECS/dcap-2.44.0-0/ shows they are the same. Good, but dist-f14 build fails http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2047198 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.UnbB6j: line 32: aclocal: command not found RPM build errors: autotools needs adding. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558544] Review Request: gdisk - An fdisk-like partitioning tool for GPT disks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558544 Terje Røsten changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Terje Røsten 2010-03-11 14:02:17 EST --- Hi again Kalev, if bored, please consider #560728 :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556346] Review Request: stage - A 2.5D multi-robot simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556346 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-03-11 13:46:07 EST --- I think this package itself is in good shape, however as this is needsponsor ticket, I will check another review request by you (bug 530251) following: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551857] Review Request: fwsnort - Translates Snort rules into equivalent iptables rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551857 Juan Manuel Rodriguez changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nus...@fedoraproject.org|nob...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565502] Review Request: python-recaptcha-client - A plugin for reCAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA Mailhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565502 Stephen Gallagher changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Stephen Gallagher 2010-03-11 12:22:43 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-recaptcha-client Short Description: Python module for reCAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA Mailhide Owners: sgallagh Branches: F-12 F-13 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565502] Review Request: python-recaptcha-client - A plugin for reCAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA Mailhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565502 Dave Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dmalc...@redhat.c |fedora-review+ |om) | --- Comment #7 from Dave Malcolm 2010-03-11 12:12:49 EST --- Looking good, but you didn't rerun rpmlint; this shows a problem: python-recaptcha-client.src:60: W: macro-in-%changelog %files 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. APPROVED, but please fix the above issue by escaping that reference to "%files" to "%%files" when you import the package, and ensure that rpmlint is thus clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558544] Review Request: gdisk - An fdisk-like partitioning tool for GPT disks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558544 Terje Røsten changed: What|Removed |Added CC||terje...@phys.ntnu.no Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Terje Røsten 2010-03-11 12:08:36 EST --- Will change the source url. Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gdisk Short Description: An fdisk-like partitioning tool for GPT disks Owners: terjeros Branches: F-11 F-12 F-13 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565502] Review Request: python-recaptcha-client - A plugin for reCAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA Mailhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565502 Stephen Gallagher changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(dmalc...@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #6 from Stephen Gallagher 2010-03-11 12:03:02 EST --- Thanks for the review. Updated spec and srpm: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~sgallagh/packagereview/python-recaptcha-client.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~sgallagh/packagereview/python-recaptcha-client-1.0.5-2.fc12.src.rpm Built successfully in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2046956 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553717] Review Request: libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553717 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 11:31:20 EST --- libcrystalhd-0.9.25-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcrystalhd-0.9.25-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565502] Review Request: python-recaptcha-client - A plugin for reCAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA Mailhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565502 Dave Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #5 from Dave Malcolm 2010-03-11 11:30:24 EST --- A few minor nits: - remove the "# sitelib for noarch packages, sitearch for others (remove the unneeded one)" comment, and just use sitelib. FWIW, these aren't actually needed in Fedora 13 onwards; see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#Macros on how to conditionalize them - in the %build stanza, remove the comment about removing CFLAGS, and actually remove the CFLAGS :) - the comment in the %files stanza is probably redundant - in future %changelog entries, it can be better to briefly say what the changes were, rather than "specfile changes" - the Summary says "A plugin for reCAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA Mailhide", and I find this wording rather awkward. If I'm reading it right "reCAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA Mailhide" is the functionality being added, but what is the program to which the functionality is being added? If it's "python", then the normal wording would be "Python module" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553717] Review Request: libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553717 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 11:32:09 EST --- libcrystalhd-0.9.25-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcrystalhd-0.9.25-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572447] Review Request: compat-gdbm - A GNU set of database routines compatibility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572447 --- Comment #9 from Karel Klíč 2010-03-11 11:00:05 EST --- The hacks are removed in gdbm-1_8_3-5_fc14. When building and pushing compat-gdbm into rawhide, gdbm-1_8_3-5_fc14 should also be built, and the packages should land into rawhide together. Rex, thank you for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566729] Review Request: CharLS - An optimized implementation of the JPEG-LS standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566729 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 10:48:16 EST --- CharLS-1.0-0.1.b.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/CharLS-1.0-0.1.b.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566729] Review Request: CharLS - An optimized implementation of the JPEG-LS standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566729 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 10:48:05 EST --- CharLS-1.0-0.1.b.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/CharLS-1.0-0.1.b.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566729] Review Request: CharLS - An optimized implementation of the JPEG-LS standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566729 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 10:48:11 EST --- CharLS-1.0-0.1.b.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/CharLS-1.0-0.1.b.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572447] Review Request: compat-gdbm - A GNU set of database routines compatibility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572447 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter 2010-03-11 10:39:36 EST --- Re: comment #6 the symlinks didn't help there, but the fake Provides One last minor comment, the auto*foo modifications should be in %setup, not %build section. But, I won't block on that. Thanks for the modifications. APPROVED. Correct too about the hacks to main gdbm package need to be removed before this lands. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570951] Review Request: krb5-appl - Kerberos-aware telnet/ftp/rcp/rsh/rlogin (upstream split from krb5)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570951 Sumit Bose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sb...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sb...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #51 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-03-11 10:01:48 EST --- Please file a bug against pymol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572447] Review Request: compat-gdbm - A GNU set of database routines compatibility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572447 --- Comment #7 from Karel Klíč 2010-03-11 09:54:28 EST --- Spec URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/compat-gdbm.spec SRPM URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/compat-gdbm-1.8.0-2.fc12.src.rpm Removed `Obsoletes: gdbm...` Used %%configure --disable-static instead of removing libgdmb.a Symbolic links (libgdbm.so.2->libgdmb.so.3) and some "Provides" tags must be removed from the gdbm package _before_ this package goes to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572447] Review Request: compat-gdbm - A GNU set of database routines compatibility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572447 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #6 from Paul Howarth 2010-03-11 09:45:55 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > symlinks won't solve the bootstrapping problem with rpm-build/perl deps. Why do you say that? I've successfully rebuilt perl locally in mock with the new gdbm (with symlinks) in the buildroot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 Fabien Archambault changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marbolan...@gmail.com --- Comment #50 from Fabien Archambault 2010-03-11 09:30:18 EST --- Hello all, I am not sure this is the good place but is it possible to have an update of the rpm of pymol which is for the moment at the version 3866 in Fedora 12 and the cvs is at the version 3897. Thanks in advance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562366] Review request: zinnia - online handwriting recognition system with machine learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562366 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 09:25:07 EST --- zinnia-0.05-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zinnia-0.05-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562366] Review request: zinnia - online handwriting recognition system with machine learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562366 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 09:25:14 EST --- zinnia-0.05-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zinnia-0.05-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562366] Review request: zinnia - online handwriting recognition system with machine learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562366 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 09:25:00 EST --- zinnia-0.05-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zinnia-0.05-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567348] Review Request: dreampie - A graphical cross-platform interactive Python shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567348 --- Comment #5 from Mads Kiilerich 2010-03-11 09:00:53 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) > On the other hand I think you too should've checked bugzilla or the > fedora-package-review list earlier. Yeah. I checked before contacting upstream, but I took the wrong semaphore. I should have learned from the dining philosophers and taken all of them. Lesson learned for next time ;-) > I see you've already established a relationship with upstream, so if you want > I > can leave this package for you to take ownership of. Thanks, but no thanks - you came here first, so please keep going. > I agree with your observations, except for the license field, which should > probably look like this: > > License: GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ and BSD and ASL 2.0 and Python > > if guidelines were to be followed: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios You are right. But I think that we have to be pragmatic as long as there are no license violations. For example, I think it is fair enough to say that the linux kernel is GPLv2 even though it (AFAIK) contains files under BSD. > Alternatively we could try convincing upstream to relicense some of those > files. You as packager are free to do it as well. If the package re-license it as GPL then it is GPL. (IANAL) > I was leaving the zip file issue for discussion with the reviewer. IMHO the packager should do all the work and review the package himself to make sure it is perfect. The reviewer should just review and verify. But let us discuss it until we agree that the package is perfect and ready for a formal review. > I don't think there's any reason to create a subpackage since we can't > determine at build time if the user has python3 installed and everyone who has > python3 will probably want py3 support in dreampie. I think we can just > install > these "data files" (as upstream calls them) side-by-side for Fedora releases > with python3 (>=F13). Running dreampie against either a py2 or py3 interpreter > is one of the major features of dreampie imho, so it shouldn't be in a > different subpackage. FWIW I disagree. It is not data files but executable code. If python3 is a build dependency (in fedora versions where it is available) then it _is_ installed. Users who want py3 should install py3 packages. Optional dependencies should be in sub-packages. Nothing special here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572447] Review Request: compat-gdbm - A GNU set of database routines compatibility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572447 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2010-03-11 08:44:20 EST --- 1. SHOULD: instead of building, then manually removing libgdbm.a, use %configure --disable-static 2. MUST: remove Obsoletes: gdbm <= 1.8.0, gdbm-devel <= 1.8.0 the gdbm upgrade path should go to the newer gdbm-1.8.3+ pkgs, not this one The rest looks pretty simple and good guidelines-wise. Fix these (well, at least the MUST item #2), and I'll approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572529] New: Review Request: compat-gdbm - A compat set of database routines which use extensible hashing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: compat-gdbm - A compat set of database routines which use extensible hashing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572529 Summary: Review Request: compat-gdbm - A compat set of database routines which use extensible hashing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/compat-gdbm/compat-gdbm.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/compat-gdbm/compat-gdbm-1.8.0-33.fc12.src.rpm Description: Gdbm is a GNU database indexing library This is a (short-term?) fix to allow a new gdbm into rawhide that provides a new ABI. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2046298 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572529] Review Request: compat-gdbm - A compat set of database routines which use extensible hashing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572529 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2010-03-11 08:35:12 EST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 572447 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572447] Review Request: compat-gdbm - A GNU set of database routines compatibility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572447 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2010-03-11 08:36:42 EST --- symlinks won't solve the bootstrapping problem with rpm-build/perl deps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572447] Review Request: compat-gdbm - A GNU set of database routines compatibility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572447 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2010-03-11 08:37:31 EST --- I can help review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572447] Review Request: compat-gdbm - A GNU set of database routines compatibility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572447 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2010-03-11 08:35:12 EST --- *** Bug 572529 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563820] Review Request: globus-libxml2 - Globus Toolkit - LibXML2 Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563820 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||globus-libxml2-1.8-1.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||taipeifonts-1.2-12.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554260] Review Request: ibus-table-xingma - The structure tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554260 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ibus-table-xingma-1.2.0.201 ||00305-2.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556216] Review Request: bangarang - A media player for the KDE SC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556216 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||bangarang-1.0-2.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554260] Review Request: ibus-table-xingma - The structure tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554260 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 08:33:33 EST --- ibus-table-xingma-1.2.0.20100305-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563820] Review Request: globus-libxml2 - Globus Toolkit - LibXML2 Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563820 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 08:30:55 EST --- globus-libxml2-1.8-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556216] Review Request: bangarang - A media player for the KDE SC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556216 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-11 08:33:51 EST --- bangarang-1.0-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
