[Bug 574249] Review Request: mbox2eml - Split mbox mailboxes into single .eml files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574249 --- Comment #2 from Ville Skyttä 2010-03-18 02:49:33 EDT --- Thanks for the review. The bundled COPYING is indeed the GPL v2 text, and it states "If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation." which means that GPL+ is the right thing to do. See also the GPL+ entry at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing: "A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the version in whatever COPYING file they include." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574662] New: Review Request: perl-CDDB - CDDB Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CDDB - CDDB Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574662 Summary: Review Request: perl-CDDB - CDDB Perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jan.kle...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-CDDB.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-CDDB-1.220-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: CDDB protocol (cddbp) servers provide compact disc information for programs that need it. This allows such programs to display disc and track titles automatically, and it provides extended information like liner notes and lyrics. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2060198 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 510464] Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510464 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2010-03-18 02:16:49 EDT --- If someone is ready to review it, i can update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556346] Review Request: stage - A 2.5D multi-robot simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556346 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #35 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-03-18 00:23:04 EDT --- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508441] Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508441 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 23:33:47 EDT --- sugar-view-slides-8-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-view-slides'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-view-slides-8-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 23:32:02 EDT --- orbited-0.7.10-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566411] Review Request: umit - Nmap frontend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566411 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 23:32:46 EDT --- umit-1.0-0.3.RC.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update umit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/umit-1.0-0.3.RC.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|orbited-0.7.10-3.fc12 |orbited-0.7.10-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566411] Review Request: umit - Nmap frontend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566411 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 23:29:55 EDT --- umit-1.0-0.3.RC.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update umit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/umit-1.0-0.3.RC.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566411] Review Request: umit - Nmap frontend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566411 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 23:22:29 EDT --- umit-1.0-0.3.RC.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update umit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/umit-1.0-0.3.RC.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508441] Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508441 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 23:22:04 EDT --- sugar-view-slides-8-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-view-slides'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-view-slides-8-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 23:25:10 EDT --- orbited-0.7.10-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||orbited-0.7.10-3.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508441] Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508441 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 23:17:41 EDT --- sugar-view-slides-8-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-view-slides'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-view-slides-8-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574249] Review Request: mbox2eml - Split mbox mailboxes into single .eml files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574249
manuel wolfshant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2010-03-17
23:19:49 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM: empty
binary RPM:empty
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPLv2+ according to the bundled COPYING file
License type: GPL+ according to the spec
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of source file: 8fa8cf4ebeea239fd2149a94ee607142ddceabb1
mbox2eml-0.1.1.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Final provides and requires are sane.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on:
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[-] %check is present and the test passes.
=== Issues ===
1. As far as i can see, the source files include no license specification, but
the bundled COPYING is the stock GPLv2+. I think that the license tag in the
spec file must be adjusted according to that. I'll trust your decision about
this.
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|TurboGears2-2.0.3-3.el5 |TurboGears2-2.0.3-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 23:20:51 EDT --- TurboGears2-2.0.3-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 477546] Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 manuel wolfshant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro|nob...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 477546] Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 manuel wolfshant changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 510464] Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510464 Kyle Pablo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kylepa...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Kyle Pablo 2010-03-17 22:58:18 EDT --- Can we get this packaged for F11/12 or not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569492] Review Request: Ailurus - "Install software" + "Configure Linux" + "Study Linux skills"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569492 Liang Suilong changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574627] New: Review request: ibus-sunpinyin - iBus SunPinyin IMEngine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: ibus-sunpinyin - iBus SunPinyin IMEngine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574627 Summary: Review request: ibus-sunpinyin - iBus SunPinyin IMEngine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: liangsuil...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Ibus-sunpinyin is a wrapper for SunPinyin 2 on IBus platform. Both of ibus-sunpinyin and SunPinyin itself are dual licensed under LGPL 2.1 and CDDL. SPEC: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1352061/ibus-sunpinyin.spec SRPM: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1352061/ibus-sunpinyin-2.0-0.9.rc8.fc12.src.rpm Koji result: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2059096 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553533] Review Request: ibus-table-code - The code tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553533 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553533] Review Request: ibus-table-code - The code tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553533 --- Comment #11 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-03-17 20:23:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ibus-table-code Short Description: The code tables for IBus-Table Owners: kaio Branches: F-13 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 552999] Review Request: curblaster - NCurses sidescroller, with gameplay loosely based on some others.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552999 --- Comment #14 from Andrea Musuruane 2010-03-17 18:37:49 EDT --- Jon, we are almost done. Everything seems fine except a little glitch in the upstream Makefile. And since you are upstream you have the privilege to fix it instead of patching it :-) $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are passed correctly but you are also using some fixed flag in the Makefile, as in the following example: $(CXX) -g -c main.cpp The "-g" parameters is fixed and cannot be taken out or changed. I suggest you do something like the following. At the beginning of your Makefile declare the CFLAGS you "upstream" want to use. E.g.: CFLAGS = -g This variable will be overwritten if it is passed in the make invocation, like you are already doing in the spec file. Then call the compiler as in this example: $(CXX) $(CFLAGS) -c main.cpp In this way you have complete control of the flags, i.e. for both "upstream" and "downstream". HTH! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560728] Review Request: uperf - Network performance tool with modelling and replay support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560728 Kalev Lember changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ka...@smartlink.ee AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ka...@smartlink.ee Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember 2010-03-17 18:05:31 EDT --- Why are you bundling client.pem and server.pem with other documentation? I don't think it's a good idea to distribute x509 certificates with private keys like that. Everybody should always generate their own certificates and private keys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573151] Review Request: python26 - Parallel-installable Python 2.6 for EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573151 Dave Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||574586 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574586] Review Request: python26-psycopg2 : psycopg2 Postgres client code for python26 on EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574586 Dave Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dev...@commandprompt.com Depends on||573151(Python26EPEL5) --- Comment #1 from Dave Malcolm 2010-03-17 17:44:09 EDT --- CCing Devrim GUNDUZ, maintainer of python-psycopg2 Devrim: I'm working on a python2.6 stack for EPEL5, parallel-installable with the main 2.4 stack, and one package I want to maintain is a 2.6 build of psycopg2. I hope the above looks sane to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574586] New: Review Request: python26-psycopg2 : psycopg2 Postgres client code for python26 on EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python26-psycopg2 : psycopg2 Postgres client code for python26 on EPEL5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574586 Summary: Review Request: python26-psycopg2 : psycopg2 Postgres client code for python26 on EPEL5 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmalc...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-psycopg2.spec SRPM URL: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-psycopg2-2.0.14-2.el5.src.rpm Note: this is purely intended for the EPEL5 branch, not for Fedora Description: I'm working on a python2.6 stack, parallel-installable with the main 2.4 stack. This is python-psycopg2-2.0.14-1 from EPEL5 reworked somewhat so that it builds against python2.6, rather than python2.4 Diff versus that specfile: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/from-python-psycopg2-2.0.14-1-to-python26-psycopg2-2.0.14-2.diff The rpmlint output is clean, apart from this warning (due to the dist tag): python26-psycopg2.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0.14-2 2.0.14-2.el5 The "License" of that package appears to be LGPL version 3 or later, with an exception. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing says "Please be sure that any exceptions are approved by emailing them to fedora-legal-l...@redhat.com first." I haven't done that yet; was this done for python-psycopg2? The original review request for python-psycopg2 was bug 199784. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487281] Review Request: eGroupware - A web-based groupware suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487281 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-03-17 17:17:27 EDT --- Hm, about work yoa ask? All packaging done and I use eGroupware on my server and wait review here. In few days I plan update it to new 1.6.003 version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574575] New: Review Request: log5j - Simple java logging library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: log5j - Simple java logging library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574575 Summary: Review Request: log5j - Simple java logging library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jsher...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jlsherrill.fedorapeople.org/log5j/log5j.spec SRPM URL: http://jlsherrill.fedorapeople.org/log5j/log5j-1.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The log5j package supports a 'modernized' interface on top of the class Log4j API usage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 568833] Review Request: OpenLP - Church projection software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568833 --- Comment #13 from TR Bentley 2010-03-17 16:47:51 EDT --- Updated for new code version Spec File : http://trb143.fedorapeople.org/OpenLP.spec Source RPM File : http://trb143.fedorapeople.org/OpenLP-1.9.0-bzr741.src.rpm Followed through the comments in #10. installed and test run with Mock and have a clean build. I have managed to build and test run this but as this is my first rpm I have some problems I would like some help with. The release number is different - is this a major issue but it matches upstream I have problems getting a desktop icon. It is in the original tar.gz but the python build looses it. Removing this statement breaks the install so I am confused. Looked at Eric and marave for guidance. Can anyone help me sort this out and get it into Fedora . Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573802] Review Request: perl-Audio-Beep - Audio::Beep Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573802 Jan Klepek changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2010-03-17 16:44:52 EDT --- sorry, forgot that line. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Audio-Beep Short Description: Audio::Beep Perl module Owners: hpejakle Branches: F-11 F-12 F-13 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573932] Review Request: perl-IO-Compress - IO::Compress Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573932 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cw...@alumni.drew.edu AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cw...@alumni.drew.edu Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573151] Review Request: python26 - Parallel-installable Python 2.6 for EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573151
--- Comment #16 from Steve Traylen 2010-03-17 16:39:46
EDT ---
Changing
install %{SOURCE5} %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/rpm/macros.python26
to
install -p -m 644 %{SOURCE5} %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/rpm/macros.python26
will remove the
python26.i386: E: script-without-shebang /etc/rpm/macros.python26
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573151] Review Request: python26 - Parallel-installable Python 2.6 for EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573151
--- Comment #15 from Steve Traylen 2010-03-17 16:16:41
EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=400877)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=400877)
Clean rpmlint on .spec file.
This is cosmetic but cleans up:
python26.spec:342: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes Distutils
python26.spec:343: W: unversioned-explicit-provides Distutils
python26.spec:344: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes python2
python26.spec:415: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes python2-devel
python26.spec:436: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes python2-tools
python26.spec:451: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes tkinter2
python26.spec:730: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/python%{pybasever}/site-packages
python26.spec:789: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/debug/%{_libdir}
python26.spec:956: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{_prefix}/lib/python%{pybasever}
python26.spec:957: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{_prefix}/lib/python%{pybasever}/site-packages
python26.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 27, tab: line 159)
python26.spec: W: %ifarch-applied-patch Patch101:
python-2.3.4-lib64-regex.patch
to
python26.spec:728: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/python%{pybasever}/site-packages
python26.spec:787: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/debug/%{_libdir}
python26.spec:954: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{_prefix}/lib/python%{pybasever}
python26.spec:955: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{_prefix}/lib/python%{pybasever}/site-packages
python26.spec: W: %ifarch-applied-patch Patch101:
python-2.3.4-lib64-regex.patch
The hardcoded-lib-paths are easily justified. I leave to someone else
to decide if that last patch is safe on other archs.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573929] Review Request: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib - Low-Level Interface to zlib compression library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573929 Mark Chappell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mark Chappell 2010-03-17 16:03:08 EDT --- $ rpmlint perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.024-2.fc14.*.rpm perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.src: E: specfile-error sh: line 1: fg: no job control perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.src: E: specfile-error sh: line 1: fg: no job control perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.src: E: specfile-error sh: line 1: fg: no job control 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. Logs show it's no longer building it's own zlib http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2059728 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569204] Review Request: rawtherapee - Raw image processing software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569204 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #21 from Sebastian Dziallas 2010-03-17 16:03:27 EDT --- Alright, thanks! Since all other issues have been fixed, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569204] Review Request: rawtherapee - Raw image processing software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569204 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| --- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-03-17 15:47:33 EDT --- No, this was my mistake, I accidentally installed the older SRPM. Lifting FE-Legal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569204] Review Request: rawtherapee - Raw image processing software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569204 --- Comment #19 from Sebastian Dziallas 2010-03-17 15:41:36 EDT --- Or wait, are you referring to the english-us file? If that's the blocker, Thibault, you should probably nag upstream... ;) /me is sorry for all this confusion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569204] Review Request: rawtherapee - Raw image processing software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569204 --- Comment #18 from Sebastian Dziallas 2010-03-17 15:38:12 EDT --- Uh? Perhaps I'm wrong, but I can't see them anywhere, neither in the source rpm nor in the built one in 3.0-0.10.a1. Just to make sure I get you correctly, you're talking about the files in /release/languages and /release/themes, right? The languages folder seems to contain only the english-us locale and the themes folder is apparently empty. 3.0-0.9.a1 still had those in, but I thought Thibault had fixed this with the new update - am I missing anything? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523715] Review Request: logiweb - a system for electronic distribution of mathematics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523715
--- Comment #48 from Klaus Grue 2010-03-17 15:31:34 EDT ---
> Now I will wait for the updated srpm.
It may take a few days. I experiment with qemu to get
ExcludeArch: ppc64
rather than
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ppc
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556346] Review Request: stage - A 2.5D multi-robot simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556346 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a.bad...@gmail.com --- Comment #34 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-03-17 15:36:03 EDT --- In the packagedb update on Monday, the bugzilla sync script wasn't updated. Now fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487281] Review Request: eGroupware - A web-based groupware suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487281 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mru...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge 2010-03-17 15:30:33 EDT --- Ping Pavel, are you still working on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569204] Review Request: rawtherapee - Raw image processing software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569204 --- Comment #17 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-03-17 15:26:46 EDT --- Perhaps I'm not being clear. The translations and themes are still present, and they do not have licensing. This is not acceptable. They either need to have their license clarified or they need to be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569204] Review Request: rawtherapee - Raw image processing software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569204 --- Comment #16 from Sebastian Dziallas 2010-03-17 15:18:03 EDT --- Awesome, thanks - Spot, your call! ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 Bug 468804 depends on bug 507697, which changed state. Bug 507697 Summary: Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 15:12:44 EDT --- python-tg-devtools-2.0.2-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 15:13:34 EDT --- python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-migrate0.5-0.5.3-7.e ||l5 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||TurboGears2-2.0.3-3.el5 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-tg-devtools-2.0.2-5. ||el5 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.5.5-1.fc10|python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5- ||1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 15:14:09 EDT --- TurboGears2-2.0.3-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 15:12:00 EDT --- python-repoze-tm2-1.0-0.5.a4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 15:11:41 EDT --- python-migrate0.5-0.5.3-7.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569204] Review Request: rawtherapee - Raw image processing software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569204 --- Comment #15 from Thibault North 2010-03-17 14:58:47 EDT --- Ok. Actually removed these files, plus windows libs. (lib/*.a) Now calls ldconfig at %post and %postun. In the future, we will certainly drop these shared libs that aren't use by other programs. http://tnorth.ch/fedora/rawtherapee.spec http://tnorth.ch/fedora/rawtherapee-3.0-0.10.a1.fc12.src.rpm Source archive is now less than 900KiB. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2059589 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574506] Review Request: python26-setuptools - the "Distribute" fork of setuptools for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574506 Dave Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||574545 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573151] Review Request: python26 - Parallel-installable Python 2.6 for EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573151 --- Comment #14 from Dave Malcolm 2010-03-17 14:57:25 EDT --- Likewise, I've opened a review request for python26-mysqldb; see bug 574545 (again, marked as depending on bug 574506) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574545] Review Request: python26-mysqldb : Interface to MySQL for python26 on EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574545 Dave Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||574506 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574506] Review Request: python26-setuptools - the "Distribute" fork of setuptools for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574506 --- Comment #5 from BJ Dierkes 2010-03-17 14:56:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Why not package as 'python26-distribute' which 'Provides: > > python26-setuptools'? > > OK. I was following what Fedora 13 did here. > > Is the rebase acceptable, or would you prefer a most conservative approach? > Hmm... wonder why they did it that way. Functionality is the important thing... though it seems confusing to me... most users would assume that python26-setuptools means setuptools... not distribute. Maybe there was some reason why they did it that way that I'm missing. Maybe your reviewer can comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574545] New: Review Request: python26-mysqldb : Interface to MySQL for python26 on EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python26-mysqldb : Interface to MySQL for python26 on EPEL5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574545 Summary: Review Request: python26-mysqldb : Interface to MySQL for python26 on EPEL5 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmalc...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-mysqldb.spec SRPM URL: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-mysqldb-1.2.3c1-2.el5.src.rpm Note: this is purely intended for the EPEL5 branch, not for Fedora Description: This is the python26-mysqldb package from IUS for EL5: http://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/stable/Redhat/5/SRPMS/python26-mysqldb-1.2.3c1-1.ius.el5.src.rpm http://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/stable/Redhat/5/SRPMS/repoview/python26-mysqldb.html reworked somewhat for import into EPEL5 Diff versus that specfile: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-mysqldb-from-1.2.3c1-1.ius-to-1.2.3c1-2.diff I used this command to fix the encoding of the specfile: iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 python26-mysqldb.spec > tmp.spec The rpmlint output is clean, apart from this warning (due to the dist tag): python26-mysqldb.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.3c1-2 1.2.3c1-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563001] Review Request: xfce4-remmina-plugin - Xfce panel plugin for remmina remote desktop client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563001 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 14:52:33 EDT --- xfce4-remmina-plugin-0.7.2-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-remmina-plugin-0.7.2-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563001] Review Request: xfce4-remmina-plugin - Xfce panel plugin for remmina remote desktop client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563001 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 14:50:38 EDT --- xfce4-remmina-plugin-0.7.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-remmina-plugin-0.7.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563001] Review Request: xfce4-remmina-plugin - Xfce panel plugin for remmina remote desktop client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563001 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-17 14:51:00 EDT --- xfce4-remmina-plugin-0.7.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-remmina-plugin-0.7.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573721] Review Request: javacc-maven-plugin - JavaCC Maven Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573721 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-03-17 14:34:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: javacc-maven-plugin Short Description: JavaCC Maven Plugin Owners: akurtakov Branches: F-13 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573151] Review Request: python26 - Parallel-installable Python 2.6 for EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573151 --- Comment #13 from Dave Malcolm 2010-03-17 14:22:30 EDT --- I've opened a review request for python26-nose; see bug 574531 (marked as depending on bug 574506) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573721] Review Request: javacc-maven-plugin - JavaCC Maven Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573721 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-17 14:23:56 EDT --- There's no owner set? (I assume it's going to be you, but our script doesn't grok that). Can you update and reset the flag when you are ready? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574026] Review Request: aic94xx-firmware - Adaptec SAS 44300, 48300, 58300 Sequencer Firmware for AIC94xx driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574026 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-17 14:25:12 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573802] Review Request: perl-Audio-Beep - Audio::Beep Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573802 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-17 14:24:40 EDT --- Please set an owner in your template and reset the flag when you are ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574531] New: Review Request: python26-nose - The "nose" testing package for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python26-nose - The "nose" testing package for the python26 EPEL5 package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574531 Summary: Review Request: python26-nose - The "nose" testing package for the python26 EPEL5 package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmalc...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-nose.spec SRPM URL: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-nose-0.11.1-2.el5.src.rpm Note: this is purely intended for the EPEL5 branch, not for Fedora Description: This is the python26-nose package from IUS for EL5: http://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/stable/Redhat/5/SRPMS/python26-nose-0.11.1-1.ius.el5.src.rpm reworked somewhat for import into EPEL5 Diff versus that specfile: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-nose-from-0.11.1-1.ius-to-0.11.1-1.diff The rpmlint output is clean, apart from this warning (due to the dist tag): python26-nose.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.11.1-2 0.11.1-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556346] Review Request: stage - A 2.5D multi-robot simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556346 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-03-17 14:16:55 EDT --- Anyway closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567542] Review Request: perl-App-cpanminus - Get, unpack, build and install modules from CPAN
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567542 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-17 14:19:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565376] Review Request: qstardict - StarDict clone written in Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565376 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-17 14:17:36 EDT --- No need to have cvs change description. It should update from the description in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574531] Review Request: python26-nose - The "nose" testing package for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574531 Dave Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||574506 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574506] Review Request: python26-setuptools - the "Distribute" fork of setuptools for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574506 Dave Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||574531 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569157] Review Request: detox - Utility to replace problematic characters in file names
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569157 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-17 14:20:32 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563001] Review Request: xfce4-remmina-plugin - Xfce panel plugin for remmina remote desktop client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563001 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-17 14:12:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563820] Review Request: globus-libxml2 - Globus Toolkit - LibXML2 Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563820 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-17 14:15:38 EDT --- Just push the new version with the right name and pkgdb should pick it up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574506] Review Request: python26-setuptools - the "Distribute" fork of setuptools for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574506 --- Comment #4 from Dave Malcolm 2010-03-17 14:07:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Is the rebase acceptable, or would you prefer a most conservative approach? > s/most/more , I meant to write -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532521] Review request: trove4j - High performance collections for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532521 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-17 14:07:55 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-17 14:06:26 EDT --- No need to do a cvs request for these. They update as your update your package. ;) It's already correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574506] Review Request: python26-setuptools - the "Distribute" fork of setuptools for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574506 --- Comment #3 from Dave Malcolm 2010-03-17 14:06:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Why not package as 'python26-distribute' which 'Provides: > python26-setuptools'? OK. I was following what Fedora 13 did here. Is the rebase acceptable, or would you prefer a most conservative approach? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553533] Review Request: ibus-table-code - The code tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553533 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-17 14:08:45 EDT --- Please add a cvs request using the cvs request template. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574506] Review Request: python26-setuptools - the "Distribute" fork of setuptools for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574506 --- Comment #2 from Dave Malcolm 2010-03-17 14:05:32 EDT --- My bad: this package doesn't actually install :( I missed the move of easy_install to easy_install-2.6, which meant that it shadowed the version from the main stack. Updated specfile: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-setuptools.spec Updated SRPM: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-setuptools-0.6.10-2.el5.src.rpm Diff of specfile: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/from-0.6.10-1-to-0.6.10-2.diff Fixes the shadowing issue; rpmlint output is as before -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 475055] Review Request: gfan - Software for Computing Gröbner Fans and Tropical Varieties
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #29 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-17 14:03:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #60 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-17 14:02:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 191622] Review Request: perl-Expect - Expect for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191622 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-17 14:01:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569204] Review Request: rawtherapee - Raw image processing software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569204 --- Comment #14 from Thibault North 2010-03-17 13:59:13 EDT --- Ahem! Sorry for that. Will fix it ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569204] Review Request: rawtherapee - Raw image processing software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569204 --- Comment #13 from Sebastian Dziallas 2010-03-17 13:36:53 EDT --- Spot, thanks for wading through this! Oh, two things - otherwise this looks good from my side: The source tarball still seems to contain the files in question. Can you make sure to rebuild the tarball following the steps at the top of the .spec file and rebuild the .rpm? You should presumably also run this, since I see two .so files in the .rpm [1]. As soon as we can make sure that the files in question got really excluded, we'll need to ask Spot to lift FE-LEGAL, after which I can approve this. :) [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Shared_Libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574506] Review Request: python26-setuptools - the "Distribute" fork of setuptools for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574506 BJ Dierkes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wdier...@rackspace.com --- Comment #1 from BJ Dierkes 2010-03-17 13:24:18 EDT --- Why not package as 'python26-distribute' which 'Provides: python26-setuptools'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574506] New: Review Request: python26-setuptools - the "Distribute" fork of setuptools for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: python26-setuptools - the "Distribute" fork of
setuptools for the python26 EPEL5 package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574506
Summary: Review Request: python26-setuptools - the "Distribute"
fork of setuptools for the python26 EPEL5 package
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: dmalc...@redhat.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Spec URL:
http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-setuptools.spec
SRPM URL:
http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-setuptools-0.6.10-1.el5.src.rpm
Note: this is purely intended for the EPEL5 branch, not for Fedora
Description:
This is a python26-setuptools to go with python26 in EPEL5. I haven't been as
conservative as I could, as this is the latest F-13 version of
python-setuptools, with the Python 3 support removed, and with some ideas taken
from the IUS python26-setuptools.
It is a rebase to the "distribute" fork of setuptools.
I haven't split out a separate -devel subpackage, as in the python26 build (see
bug 573151) the files needed at runtime by easy_install are in the core
"python26" subpackage, rather than "python26-devel"
If desired, I could instead be more conservative and simply reuse the
python26-setuptools from IUS.
It contains the .pyc fix referred to in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573151#c9
I wasn't able to scratch build in Koji, as it needs python26 ("No Package
Found for python26-devel"); is this doable with chain builds?
The rpmlint output is clean, apart from this warning (due to the dist tag):
python26-setuptools.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.10-1
0.6.10-1.el5
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573151] Review Request: python26 - Parallel-installable Python 2.6 for EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573151 Dave Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||574506 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573151] Review Request: python26 - Parallel-installable Python 2.6 for EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573151 --- Comment #12 from Dave Malcolm 2010-03-17 13:14:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I had no idea... I think that sounds sane and not a big deal if all the > packagers need to do is define __os_install_post. I assume python26-devel > would provide the macros file? I actually added it to the core "python26" subpackage. I've opened a review request for python26-setuptools; see bug 574506 (marked as depending on this one) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574506] Review Request: python26-setuptools - the "Distribute" fork of setuptools for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574506 Dave Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||573151 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573151] Review Request: python26 - Parallel-installable Python 2.6 for EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573151 Dave Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||Python26EPEL5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569204] Review Request: rawtherapee - Raw image processing software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569204 --- Comment #12 from Thibault North 2010-03-17 13:05:34 EDT --- Hi again, New spec and source rpm here: http://tnorth.ch/fedora/rawtherapee.spec http://tnorth.ch/fedora/rawtherapee-3.0-0.9.a1.fc12.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2059329 Hope it will fix our legal issues :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573151] Review Request: python26 - Parallel-installable Python 2.6 for EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573151
--- Comment #9 from Dave Malcolm 2010-03-17 11:53:44 EDT
---
I discovered a problem with .pyc/.pyo files when attempting to rebuild
python26-setuptools: on the build I did on my RHEL5 workstation, the .pyc files
are incorrectly byte-compiled for 2.4, not 2.6 (the first four bytes are 6d f2
0d 0a, which is a 2.4 bytecode file, when it should be d1 f2 0d 0a for 2.6).
The problem is that RHEL5's /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros contains a definition of
%__os_install_post which invokes /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile without
any arguments, which leads to all .py files in a package payload being
byte-compiled with /usr/bin/python (rather than, say, /usr/bin/python2.6)
If there's a mismatching "magic" number, Python can't used the cached bytecode,
and will be forced to recompile the .py file (the bytecode _is_ incompatible),
which is slow; if running as non-root the runtime will have to recompile every
time, since it doesn't have permission to write back the .py file. If running
as root the file will get written back, leading to noise from rpm -V and
probably SELinux mislabeling woes.
I believe this will affect anyone building any Python modules as RPMs for
non-standard Python stacks on RHEL5. It looks like IUS builds are affected by
the same problem: specifically, I looked at
http://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/stable/Redhat/5/x86_64/python26-setuptools-0.6c9-1.1.ius.el5.noarch.rpm
and it too has .pyc files erroneously starting with 0x6d (py2.4), not 0xd1
(py2.6).
I ran into this problem with the Python 3 stack in Fedora, and I wrote an
rpmlint test for it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531102
which is in rpmlint upstream as of 0.93
We fixed it in Fedora 13 by fixing rpm-build:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531117
Changing rpm-build for this is not going to be doable in the context of EPEL,
so it looks like we need to supply a script to do this.
The approach I'm following is to add a new macro file:
/etc/rpm/macros.python26
as part of the core "python26" package, containing a reimplementation of
"__os_install_post" intended to be identical to the standard one, except that
it specifies "python26" when invoking "brp-python-bytecompile".
Then every python26-foo module would need to define __os_install_post to use
the alternate implementation.rpm automatically looks in that directory for
add-on macros, so no further work ought to be necessary.
Hopefully this sounds sane. It looked like there were no lib vs lib64
differences in the implementation of the macro, but I didn't check on every
architecture.
I've tested this in my build of python26-setuptools, using the macro in this
way in python26-setuptools.spec:
%define __os_install_post %{__python26_os_install_post}
and when doing so, the .pyc files in the payload correctly begin with byte
0xd1, rather than (incorrectly) with byte 0x6d.
Updated specfile: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26.spec
Diff versus last specfile:
http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/from-2.6.4-22-to-2.6.4-23.diff
Updated SRPM:
http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-2.6.4-23.el5.src.rpm
Scratch build in Koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2058979
Adds this rpmlint error, which is a false-positive:
python26.i386: E: script-without-shebang /etc/rpm/macros.python26
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573151] Review Request: python26 - Parallel-installable Python 2.6 for EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573151 --- Comment #10 from Dave Malcolm 2010-03-17 12:03:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > time, since it doesn't have permission to write back the .py file. If running "the .pyc file", I meant to write -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573721] Review Request: javacc-maven-plugin - JavaCC Maven Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573721 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mary Ellen Foster 2010-03-17 11:56:45 EDT --- Looks good to me now -- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573151] Review Request: python26 - Parallel-installable Python 2.6 for EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573151 --- Comment #11 from BJ Dierkes 2010-03-17 12:20:07 EDT --- I had no idea... I think that sounds sane and not a big deal if all the packagers need to do is define __os_install_post. I assume python26-devel would provide the macros file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
