[Bug 571993] Review Request: non-sequencer - A powerful, real-time, pattern-based MIDI sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571993 --- Comment #2 from Adam Huffman 2010-03-30 02:45:51 EDT --- Thanks for taking a look. I've uploaded a new version that addresses your comments: http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/reviews/non-sequencer/non-sequencer.spec http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/reviews/non-sequencer/non-sequencer-1.9.3-2.20100131gitba94d2c354145.fc12.src.rpm $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-12-x86_64/result/*.rpm non-sequencer.src: W: invalid-url Source0: non-sequencer-20100131gitba94d2c354145.tar.bz2 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. For me it comes up full-screen at startup - not sure whether that's a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Bierfert 2010-03-30 01:08:21 EDT --- Also take a look here: http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko (In reply to comment #2) > by me, but I was wondering if you already have patches ready for wine itself > to > use this package (as wine expects a .CAB file while this package provides a > folder containing the gecko files) ? Yes, I have a patch sitting here which adds this to latest wine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578024] Review Request: ingres - Relational DBMS Server and Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578024
--- Comment #1 from Jay Hankinson 2010-03-29
23:41:05 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=403406)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=403406)
Output from rpmlint
Generated on FC11 from: rpmlint srpm/ingres.spec
/devsrc/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ingres-10.0.0-1.20100329svn2734.fc11.src.rpm
/devsrc/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/ingres-{client,server,devel,documentation,debuginfo}-10.0.0-1.20100329svn2734.fc11.i586.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578024] Review Request: ingres - Relational DBMS Server and Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578024 Jay Hankinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578024] New: Review Request: ingres - Relational DBMS Server and Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ingres - Relational DBMS Server and Utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578024
Summary: Review Request: ingres - Relational DBMS Server and
Utilities
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: jeremy.hankin...@ingres.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: ftp://ftp.ingres.com/outgoing/hanje04/srpms/ingres.spec
SRPM URL:
ftp://ftp.ingres.com/outgoing/hanje04/srpms/ingres-10.0.0-1.20100329svn2734.fc11.src.rpm
Description:
Highly scalable, multi-threaded relational database server and utilities.
Please note, this is the first product I have packaged and am requesting a
sponsor.
I have uploaded the output from rpmlint for the SPEC, SRPM and resulting binary
RPMs. Below is a summary of the warnings and errors this produced and an
attempt to explain them:
# cat ingres.rpmlint | awk '{printf "%s %s %s\n", $1, $2, $3}' | sort -u
6 packages andingres-client.i586: E: non-standard-dir-perm
ingres-client.i586: E: non-standard-executable-perm
ingres-client.i586: E: setuid-binary
Required by PAM module to authenticate incoming remote connections
ingres-client.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
Difficult to break out given current upstream packaging
ingres-client.i586: W: executable-stack
Upstream aware:
http://community.ingres.com/forum/dba-forum/11683-fedora-12-64bit-selinux-doesnt-like-ingres.html
ingres-client.i586: W: incoherent-init-script-name
Start the whole Ingres product not just client or server components
ingres-client.i586: W: log-files-without-logrotate
Would like to resolve this but not sure what it needed.
ingres-client.i586: W: no-documentation
All doc in ingres-documentation package
ingres-client.i586: W: non-conffile-in-etc
Pam config file, not sure what's wrong here
ingres-client.i586: W: non-standard-gid
ingres-client.i586: W: non-standard-uid
Ingres runs as 'ingres' user, some utilties and directories need to be owned
by the same
ingres-client.i586: W: percent-in-%pre
Using macros
ingres-client.i586: W: service-default-enabled
_Think_ this is OK, please correct me if I'm wrong
ingres-client.i586: W: summary-ended-with-dot
Missed this. Will address, guaranteed not to be the only problem ;-)
ingres-debuginfo.i586: E: non-standard-dir-perm
ingres-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm
Not sure what to do about these. debuginfo created automagically
ingres-devel.i586: W: no-dependency-on
ingres-devel.i586: W: no-documentation
As above
ingres-devel.i586: W: non-standard-gid
ingres-devel.i586: W: non-standard-uid
As above
ingres-devel.i586: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
Do the need to be?
ingres-documentation.i586: W: file-not-utf8
ingres-documentation.i586: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
PDF index file, problem?
ingres-documentation.i586: W: non-standard-gid
ingres-documentation.i586: W: non-standard-uid
As above
ingres-server.i586: E: non-standard-executable-perm
ingres-server.i586: E: setuid-binary
Required for normal operation of DBMS server
ingres-server.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
Difficult to move to devel but could be removed
ingres-server.i586: W: non-conffile-in-etc
ldconfig file, not sure what the issue is
ingres-server.i586: W: no-documentation
ingres-server.i586: W: non-standard-gid
ingres-server.i586: W: non-standard-uid
As above
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575085] Review Request: rsvndump - Remote Subversion repository dumping tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575085 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:26:55 EDT --- rsvndump-0.5.3-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575085] Review Request: rsvndump - Remote Subversion repository dumping tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575085 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rsvndump-0.5.3-1.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 510376] Review Request: bluemodem - A bluetooth modem configuration utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510376 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|bluemodem-0.7-5.fc12|bluemodem-0.7-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529605] Review Request: rubygem-ohai - Profiles your system and emits JSON
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529605 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:23:11 EDT --- rubygem-ohai-0.5.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529605] Review Request: rubygem-ohai - Profiles your system and emits JSON
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529605 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:22:28 EDT --- rubygem-ohai-0.5.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529605] Review Request: rubygem-ohai - Profiles your system and emits JSON
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529605 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-ohai-0.5.0-1.fc11 |rubygem-ohai-0.5.0-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575485] Review Request: libharu - C library for generating PDF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575485 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:21:25 EDT --- libharu-2.1.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libharu'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libharu-2.1.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550369] Review Request: spill - A segregated package install logical linker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550369 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|spill-0.8-2.fc11|spill-0.8-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574981] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - A unified interface to key/value stores
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574981 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:23:30 EDT --- rubygem-moneta-0.6.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529605] Review Request: rubygem-ohai - Profiles your system and emits JSON
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529605 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||rubygem-ohai-0.5.0-1.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550369] Review Request: spill - A segregated package install logical linker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550369 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:22:06 EDT --- spill-0.8-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574981] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - A unified interface to key/value stores
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574981 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-moneta-0.6.0-1.fc12 |rubygem-moneta-0.6.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 510376] Review Request: bluemodem - A bluetooth modem configuration utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510376 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:25:14 EDT --- bluemodem-0.7-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574979] Review Request: rubygem-bunny - Another synchronous Ruby AMQP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574979 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-bunny-0.6.0-1.fc11 |rubygem-bunny-0.6.0-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508441] Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508441 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|sugar-view-slides-8-4.fc11 |sugar-view-slides-8-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508441] Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508441 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:18:42 EDT --- sugar-view-slides-8-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:21:30 EDT --- rubygem-haml-2.2.20-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-haml-2.2.20-1.fc11 |rubygem-haml-2.2.20-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508441] Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508441 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||sugar-view-slides-8-4.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574981] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - A unified interface to key/value stores
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574981 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||rubygem-moneta-0.6.0-1.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||rubygem-haml-2.2.20-1.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574981] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - A unified interface to key/value stores
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574981 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:17:26 EDT --- rubygem-moneta-0.6.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508441] Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508441 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:19:43 EDT --- sugar-view-slides-8-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574979] Review Request: rubygem-bunny - Another synchronous Ruby AMQP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574979 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:18:31 EDT --- rubygem-bunny-0.6.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:16:38 EDT --- rubygem-haml-2.2.20-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 510376] Review Request: bluemodem - A bluetooth modem configuration utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510376 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||bluemodem-0.7-5.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA Bug 510376 depends on bug 550709, which changed state. Bug 550709 Summary: bluemodem not built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550709 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 531040] Review Request: jsmath-fonts - A collection of Math symbol fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531040 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||jsmath-fonts-20090708-2.fc1 ||2 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 531040] Review Request: jsmath-fonts - A collection of Math symbol fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531040 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:13:47 EDT --- jsmath-fonts-20090708-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 510376] Review Request: bluemodem - A bluetooth modem configuration utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510376 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:14:43 EDT --- bluemodem-0.7-5.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550369] Review Request: spill - A segregated package install logical linker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550369 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||spill-0.8-2.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549915] Review Request: FreeMat - An interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549915 --- Comment #9 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-29 22:12:37 EDT --- Hi, sorry for the delay. I was a little busy working on two packages. So, I'll be doing some refinements on the entire package. By the way, upstrean is a little unresponsive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550369] Review Request: spill - A segregated package install logical linker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550369 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:13:10 EDT --- spill-0.8-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574979] Review Request: rubygem-bunny - Another synchronous Ruby AMQP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574979 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||rubygem-bunny-0.6.0-1.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574979] Review Request: rubygem-bunny - Another synchronous Ruby AMQP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574979 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29 22:08:54 EDT --- rubygem-bunny-0.6.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576023] Review Request: libwebcam - user-space configuration of the uvcvideo driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576023 --- Comment #2 from Michael Cronenworth 2010-03-29 20:33:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hello Michael: > [snip] > > Hope this helps you! > Cheers, > Germán. Thanks! I had run rpmlint wrong. New spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/libwebcam.spec New SRPM: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/libwebcam-0.2.0-0.1.20100322svn.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #45 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-03-29 18:26:51 EDT --- You should remember to mark the review bug as closed when you do the first updates (first release), so you won't have to remember to close it yourself :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 Carl Byington changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542767] Review Request: ghemical - Molecular mechanics and quantum mechanics frontend for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542767 Bug 542767 depends on bug 542759, which changed state. Bug 542759 Summary: Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Bug 505154 depends on bug 542759, which changed state. Bug 542759 Summary: Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542765] Review Request: libghemical - Libraries for the Ghemical chemistry package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542765 Bug 542765 depends on bug 542759, which changed state. Bug 542759 Summary: Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542765] Review Request: libghemical - Libraries for the Ghemical chemistry package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542765 --- Comment #4 from Carl Byington 2010-03-29 18:06:26 EDT --- Sorry about the delay - I now have some time to work on these packages. naming - I thought there was some fedora requirement that .so objects be in -lib subpackages. data - as a separate package, that is arch-independent, which we lose if placed in the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573932] Review Request: perl-IO-Compress - IO::Compress Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573932 --- Comment #9 from Chris Weyl 2010-03-29 17:38:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Ok? Anyway I'm blocked by BR's. No pressure -- just levelsetting us to start :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 526916] Review Request: orc - The Oil Runtime Compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526916 David Schleef changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@schleef.org --- Comment #19 from David Schleef 2010-03-29 17:22:47 EDT --- The library sizes are for non-default configurations that are only intended for embedded use. The standard configuration includes all backends, plus the parser. The sizes listed here sound reasonable. The x86-64 testsuite failure is a real bug. I just fixed it in master, and will be releasing 0.4.4 shortly (todayish?) with the fix (along with a bunch of other fixes). The powerpc-64 bug appears to be a real bug, and it looks like it happens on powerpc-32 as well. I'll look into it after the release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577975] New: Review Request: kde-plasma-daisy - A versatile application launcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-daisy - A versatile application launcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577975 Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-daisy - A versatile application launcher Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: julian.fed...@googlemail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://julian.fedorapeople.org/kde-plasma-daisy/kde-plasma-daisy.spec SRPM URL: http://julian.fedorapeople.org/kde-plasma-daisy/kde-plasma-daisy-0.0.4.22-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Daisy is a versatile yet simple plasma application launcher applet. It supports three different types of roles: a circular dock, a media controller and a linear dock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577974] New: Review Request: glite-security-trustmanager - Java trustmanager interface supporting a GSI grid name space
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: glite-security-trustmanager - Java trustmanager interface supporting a GSI grid name space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577974 Summary: Review Request: glite-security-trustmanager - Java trustmanager interface supporting a GSI grid name space Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.tray...@cern.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/glite-security-trustmanager/glite-security-trustmanager.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/glite-security-trustmanager/glite-security-trustmanager-2.0.6-3.fc12.src.rpm Description: glite-security-trustmanager together with glite-security-util-java is an implementation of the java TrustManager interface with implementation of cert path checking, grid name space restrictions and dynamic loading of CA certs, credentials, CRLs and name space restrictions. Also provided is integration into tomcat, axis and axis2. There are many utility classes and methods for certificate and proxy handling in glite-security-util-java. It can be used both in the server side for the server SSL handler and on the client side for the opening of SSL connections. for the rpmlint output glite-security-trustmanager-tomcat5.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/glite-security-trustmanager the log file is maintained by log4j. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-03-29 17:10:22 EDT --- See the discussion on the fedora-mingw mailing list from november last year: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mingw/2009-November/002267.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554464] Review Request: python-pebl - Python Environment for Bayesian Learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554464 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(tadej.ja...@tadej ||.hicsalta.si) --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura 2010-03-29 17:09:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > Lastly, rpmlint gives me the following error: > > python-pebl.i586: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-matplotlib > > What does that mean? > > You can run "rpmlint -I explicit-lib-dependency". > "You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded > explicit Requires: tags." > > So R: python-matplotlib is not needed, but this could be a rpmlint bug, > because > I don't see it adding the Requires itself: > > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) > <= > 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) > <= 4.0-1 > Requires: /usr/bin/python libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) > libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) python(abi) = 2.6 rtld(GNU_HASH) I saw something similar (don't know where it was): When there is 'lib' in the name, rpmlint will complain about, but here requiring python-matplotlib is ok. By the way: Any progress? -> Ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-03-29 16:58:21 EDT --- I might have a look at this tomorrow, but I'm interested to know why wine needs a Win32-cross-compiled library? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577932] Review Request: python-geoclue - A Geoclue python module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577932 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2010-03-29 16:57:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-geoclue Short Description: A Geoclue python module Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-13 F-12 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577932] Review Request: python-geoclue - A Geoclue python module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577932
--- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2010-03-29 16:55:40
EDT ---
Thanks!
> Needswork:
> - %files
> * you should change 0.1.0 to %{version}, this way you don't need to change
> this all the time.
> * how about %doc docs/* ?
>
> - license wrong: GPLv3 -> GPLv3+
>
> - BR wrong:
> * What is pygobject2-devel for?
> Please BR pygobjec2 instead (only the python files are needed, not the
> whole -devel package).
> * Instead you need to also Require pygobject2 for python importing on
> runtime
I believe these are all fixed now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576023] Review Request: libwebcam - user-space configuration of the uvcvideo driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576023 Germán Racca changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gra...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Germán Racca 2010-03-29 16:54:13 EDT --- Hello Michael: Just a few comments based on the rpmlint output (I'm not an official reviewer, just someone looking for sponsorship): libwebcam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2 You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. ** This means that you must remove Requires: libxml2 ** libwebcam.i686: W: invalid-license LGPL The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "Giftware", "GL2PS", "Glide", "gnuplot", "GPL+", "GPL+ or Artistic", "GPL+ with exceptions", "GPLv1", "GPLv2 or Artistic", "GPLv2+ or Artistic", "GPLv2", "GPLv2 with exceptions", "GPLv2+", "GPLv2+ with exceptions", "GPLv3", "GPLv3 with exceptions", "GPLv3+", "GPLv3+ with exceptions", "IBM", "IJG", "ImageMagick", "iMatix", "Imlib2", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "ISC", "Jabber", "JasPer", "JPython", "Knuth", "LBNL BSD", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv2+ or Artistic", "LGPLv2+ with exceptions", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3 with exceptions", "LGPLv3+", "LGPLv3+ with exceptions", "libtiff", "LLGPL", ** So, you must choose a different value. According to the source package, this is LGPLv3+ ** libwebcam.i686: W: one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig You should use %post -p instead of using: %post It will avoid the fork of a shell interpreter to execute your command as well as allows rpm to automatically mark the dependency on your command for the excecution of the scriptlet. ** Self explanatory ** libwebcam.i686: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig You should use %postun -p instead of using: %postun It will avoid the fork of a shell interpreter to execute your command as well as allows rpm to automatically mark the dependency on your command for the excecution of the scriptlet. ** Also self explanatory ** Hope this helps you! Cheers, Germán. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-03-29 16:44:39 EDT --- Hi, I'll leave the review up to somebody else as this package was initially created by me, but I was wondering if you already have patches ready for wine itself to use this package (as wine expects a .CAB file while this package provides a folder containing the gecko files) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577932] Review Request: python-geoclue - A Geoclue python module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577932
Thomas Spura changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|toms...@fedoraproject.org
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2010-03-29
16:38:05 EDT ---
Review:
Good:
- rpmlint
$ rpmlint ./python-geoclue-0.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm
noarch/python-geoclue-0.1.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
- group ok
- name ok
(I believe you should directly provide python2-geoclue, because this is likly
to happen in the future.)
- BuildRoot ok
If you don't want to build in RHEL, could you delete that?
- %prep ok
- %build ok
- %install ok
- no libs
- no *.la
- buildarch: noarch ok
Needswork:
- %files
* you should change 0.1.0 to %{version}, this way you don't need to change
this all the time.
* how about %doc docs/* ?
- license wrong: GPLv3 -> GPLv3+
- BR wrong:
* What is pygobject2-devel for?
Please BR pygobjec2 instead (only the python files are needed, not the
whole -devel package).
* Instead you need to also Require pygobject2 for python importing on runtime
All needswork are easyfixes, ping me if you object to something.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573248] Review Request: garden - An innovative old-school 2D vertical shoot-em-up
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573248 Martin Gieseking changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2010-03-29 16:34:22 EDT --- Hi Ionuț, I will do the full review in the next few days. Your package looks pretty clean. The only thing I recognized so far concerns the license tag: according to the source file headers, the package is licensed under GPLv3+, not GPLv3 only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 Andreas Bierfert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjo...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Andreas Bierfert 2010-03-29 16:27:35 EDT --- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2082448 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577951] New: Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/mingw32-wine-gecko.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/mingw32-wine-gecko-1.0.0-3.fc13.src.rpm Description: MinGW Gecko library required for Wine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577932] New: Review Request: python-geoclue - A Geoclue python module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-geoclue - A Geoclue python module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577932 Summary: Review Request: python-geoclue - A Geoclue python module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobin...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/python-geoclue.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/python-geoclue-0.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This Python module uses the Geoclue D-Bus API to implement a nice API for python developers and facilitate their life. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2082418 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549366] Review Request: flaw - Small multiplayer action game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366
--- Comment #24 from Andrea Musuruane 2010-03-29 15:08:56
EDT ---
Anyway, (In reply to comment #23)
> This is a upstream bug?
No. I really believe it is an error in your spec files. I did the required
modification on my local copy and it is OK.
$ rpm -qpd /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/flaw-1.2.2-5.fc12.x86_64.rpm
/usr/share/doc/flaw-1.2.2/AUTHORS
/usr/share/doc/flaw-1.2.2/COPYING
/usr/share/doc/flaw-1.2.2/ChangeLog
/usr/share/doc/flaw-1.2.2/README
I just called configure in this way:
%configure --docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}
And changed the %files section like the following:
%files
[...]
%exclude %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/INSTALL
%doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}
If you have further problems, please post your latest SPEC and src.rpm.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564567] Review Request: gwaei - A Japanese dictionary for Gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564567
--- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-03-29
14:56:53 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=403340)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=403340)
Patch to kill autotool call for help/Makefile.am
For -2:
* SourceURL
(In reply to comment #20)
> (In reply to comment #19)
> > - For sourceforge hosted tarball, please follow
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net
> As you can see upstream doesn't respect Fedora' spec :
> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
> for any reason.
$ env LANG=C wget -N http://downloads.sourceforge.net/gwaei/gwaei-1.3.0.tar.gz
--2010-03-30 01:15:34--
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/gwaei/gwaei-1.3.0.tar.gz
Resolving downloads.sourceforge.net... 216.34.181.59
Connecting to downloads.sourceforge.net|216.34.181.59|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
Location:
http://jaist.dl.sourceforge.net/project/gwaei/gwaei/1.3.0/gwaei-1.3.0.tar.gz
[following]
--2010-03-30 01:15:34--
http://jaist.dl.sourceforge.net/project/gwaei/gwaei/1.3.0/gwaei-1.3.0.tar.gz
Resolving jaist.dl.sourceforge.net... 150.65.7.130
Connecting to jaist.dl.sourceforge.net|150.65.7.130|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 675297 (659K) [application/x-gzip]
Saving to: `gwaei-1.3.0.tar.gz'
100%[>]
675,297 --.-K/s in 0.1s
2010-03-30 01:15:34 (6.20 MB/s) - `gwaei-1.3.0.tar.gz' saved [675297/675297]
- So the URL recommended by Fedora seems to be working.
* autogen.sh
- If this is needed, it is more readable to add autogen.sh as SourceX
and copy it to build directory, rather than to create a patch which
generates autogen.sh.
- It is recommended to call autogen.sh in %prep, rather than in %build.
* automated autotool call
> > * autotool called automatically
> > Here automake is called after configure/make. autotools should be
> > already executed before configure and automatical call of
> > autotools should be avoided.
> > Usually timestamps on some files are wrong (or maybe autotools
> > were not called correctly before the tarball was packaged).
> > Please fix this.
>
> I have fixed this adding autogen.sh (coming from gwaei's git) that will do the
> required aclocal, auto* ... commands.
>
> Although, the warning you mentioned disappeared, I'm not sure this is the best
> way to do it. Advices on this point are welcomed.
- Still aututools are called automatically:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2081887
-
326 + make -j4
327 (CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh
/builddir/build/BUILD/gwaei-1.3.0/missing --run autoheader)
328 rm -f stamp-h1
329 touch config.h.in
809 Making all in help
810 make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gwaei-1.3.0/help'
811 cd .. && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/gwaei-1.3.0/missing --run
automake-1.11 --gnu help/Makefile
1003 cd .. && /bin/sh ./config.status help/Makefile
1004 config.status: creating help/Makefile
-
So config.h.in and help/Makefile.am or so are not correctly updated.
! After some investigation:
The first one (autoheader being called to regenerate config.h.in) is
while autogen.sh reads:
-
1 #! /bin/sh
2
3 aclocal \
4 && gnome-doc-prepare -c -f \
5 && automake -c -f --add-missing \
6 && autoconf -f
-
Actually:
-
$ gnome-doc-prepare -c -f
Remember to add 'GNOME_DOC_INIT' to configure.ac.
You should update your 'aclocal.m4' by running aclocal.
Putting files in AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR, 'm4'.
-
So aclocal should be called after gnome-doc-prepare.
Also "autoheader -f " is actually not called before configure. So
calling "autoheader -f" should be added to autogen.sh
The latter one (automake being automatically called to regenerate
help/Makefile.in)
is due to incorrect handling of help/Makefile.am in configure.ac.
configure.ac contains:
-
133 if([test x$gnome = xfalse]);then([cp help/Makefile.am.gnome
help/Makefile.am]);fi
134 if([test x$gnome = xtrue]);the
[Bug 577398] Review Request: python-meliae - Python memory usage statistics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577398 Dave Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(dmalc...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Dave Malcolm 2010-03-29 12:43:46 EDT --- It builds OK on Fedora 12 with Cython-0.12.1-4.fc12.x86_64 The three errors appear to all relate to "Py_ssize_t", which doesn't exist yet in the Python 2.4 in RHEL5. It's probably fixable by patching away those references in EL5 builds to ssize_t. The relevant info from 2.6's Include/pyport.h: /* Py_ssize_t is a signed integral type such that sizeof(Py_ssize_t) == * sizeof(size_t). C99 doesn't define such a thing directly (size_t is an * unsigned integral type). See PEP 353 for details. */ #ifdef HAVE_SSIZE_T typedef ssize_t Py_ssize_t; #elif SIZEOF_VOID_P == SIZEOF_SIZE_T typedef Py_intptr_t Py_ssize_t; #else # error "Python needs a typedef for Py_ssize_t in pyport.h." #endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577680] Review Request: banshee-community-extensions - Collection of extensions for the media player Banshee
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577680 Benedikt Morbach changed: What|Removed |Added CC||benedikt.morbach+fed...@goo ||glemail.com --- Comment #3 from Benedikt Morbach 2010-03-29 13:28:36 EDT --- Hi, I build banshee-community-extensions using the provided srpm on F12 and everything works fine. Thanks for packaging it. However I noticed that the ClutterFlow extension is not build. I suspect this is because clutter-gtk-sharp is currently absent, as it requires clutter-gtk >= 0.10.3 (Taken from the clutter-sharp specfile koji for F13.) But I think clutter-gtk-sharp could be enabled in clutter-sharp at least on F13 and rawhide, as clutter-gtk-0.10.4 has been submitted for stable in F13 (see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clutter-gtk-0.10.4-1.fc13 ) This would make it possible to ship ClutterFlow. Disclaimer: What I said above is untested, as I have no time to rebuild all this stuff now. Maybe someone with more insight could comment/test? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573848] Review Request: perl-NetPacket - Modules to assemble/disassemble network packets at the protocol level
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573848 --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2010-03-29 13:16:54 EDT --- upstream released new version with confirmation that License is GPL+ or Artistic 2.0 (same as perl) spelling error fixed. Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-NetPacket.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-NetPacket-0.42.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577398] Review Request: python-meliae - Python memory usage statistics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577398 --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gregorovic 2010-03-29 13:14:37 EDT --- Thanks for the quick response. Changing Py_ssize_t to ssize_t did remove a number of errors, but now I'm blocked on errors related to Sets. I'm thinking that at this point it's probably not worth trying to backport to Python 2.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577398] Review Request: python-meliae - Python memory usage statistics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577398 Dennis Gregorovic changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(dmalc...@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gregorovic 2010-03-29 12:21:13 EDT --- Does this require a particular version of Python and/or Cython? $ rpm -q python-devel Cython python-devel-2.4.3-27.el5.x86_64 Cython-0.12.1-4.el5.x86_64 $ rpmbuild --rebuild python-meliae-0.2.0-2.fc12.src.rpm [snip] creating build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.4/meliae gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fPIC -I/usr/include/python2.4 -c meliae/_scanner.c -o build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.4/meliae/_scanner.o meliae/_scanner.c: In function '__pyx_f_6meliae_8_scanner__file_io_callback': meliae/_scanner.c:489: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result meliae/_scanner.c: In function '__pyx_pf_6meliae_8_scanner_dump_object_info': meliae/_scanner.c:681: warning: passing argument 1 of '_dump_object_info' from incompatible pointer type meliae/_scanner.c:693: warning: passing argument 1 of '_dump_object_info' from incompatible pointer type gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fPIC -I/usr/include/python2.4 -c meliae/_scanner_core.c -o build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.4/meliae/_scanner_core.o In file included from meliae/_scanner_core.c:20: meliae/_scanner_core.h:35: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '_size_of' meliae/_scanner_core.c:77: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '_basic_object_size' meliae/_scanner_core.c:89: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '_var_object_size' ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 528003] Review Request: xinha - Javascript library for making textarea's WYSIWYG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528003 Nick Bebout changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 533993] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533993 Nick Bebout changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573741] Review Request: RBTools - Tools for interacting with ReviewBoard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573741 --- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout 2010-03-29 11:29:57 EDT --- I apologize, I had forgotten about this, I will try to get it done soon, but if you are able to find someone who can do it quicker, feel free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225743] Merge Review: expect
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225743 --- Comment #11 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2010-03-29 11:10:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) [snip] > > BAD debuginfo package looks complete. - rpmlint warns > expect-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/expect-5.43/exp_main_tk.c > (maybe that is nothing to worry about, let's see your comments) Honestly, don't know why it's executable. Permissions are preserved from upstream. > > BAD rpmlint is silent. > W: patch-not-applied Patch7: expect-5.43.0-tcl8.5.6.patch > (this minor warning can be easily corrected) Fixed. > > OK final provides and requires look sane. > OK %check is present and all tests pass. > > BAD shared libraries should be added to the regular linker search paths. > every binary RPM package which contains shared library files (not just > symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in > %post and %postun. > -there's /usr/lib/libexpect5.43.so and no call to /sbin/ldconfig > I think that this library is used by Tcl only, which knows the path to the library from /usr/lib64/tcl8.5/expect5.43/pkgIndex.tcl file. [snip] FYI, there's new version in devel branch... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563000] Review Request: rubygem-compass - A Sass-based CSS Meta-Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563000 Michal Fojtik changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mfoj...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Michal Fojtik 2010-03-29 10:47:08 EDT --- File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/compass-0.8.17/LICENSE.markdown /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/compass-0.8.17/README.markdown Tests are not executed (./tests) Do not use %define, use %global ./docs are not installed (not listed in %files) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576673] Review Request: beaker - Automated test system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576673
--- Comment #3 from Bill Peck 2010-03-29 10:42:59 EDT ---
Hello Till,
Another question on macro sharedstatedir, it expands into the following on my
F12 machine:
%_sharedstatedir %{_prefix}/com
That would not work since I need to put the kickstart files in the same
directory that cobbler does and after looking at its spec file it still uses
hard coded /var.
I could change it to %{_var} or %{_localstatedir}. Would that be acceptable?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549366] Review Request: flaw - Small multiplayer action game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366 --- Comment #23 from Filipe Rosset 2010-03-29 10:45:14 EDT --- This is a upstream bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549366] Review Request: flaw - Small multiplayer action game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366
--- Comment #22 from Filipe Rosset 2010-03-29
10:41:12 EDT ---
Ok, i changed %{_datadir}/doc to %{_docdir}
If i use %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} instead of %{_docdir}/%{name} i have
this errors:
test -z "/usr/share/doc/flaw" || /bin/mkdir -p
"/home/rosset/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/flaw-1.2.2-7.fc12.x86_64/usr/share/doc/flaw"
/usr/bin/install -c -m 644 README COPYING AUTHORS ChangeLog INSTALL
'/home/rosset/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/flaw-1.2.2-7.fc12.x86_64/usr/share/doc/flaw'
Processing files: flaw-1.2.2-7.fc12.x86_64
error: File not found:
/home/rosset/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/flaw-1.2.2-7.fc12.x86_64/usr/share/doc/flaw-1.2.2
RPM build error:
File not found:
/home/rosset/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/flaw-1.2.2-7.fc12.x86_64/usr/share/doc/flaw-1.2.2
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549366] Review Request: flaw - Small multiplayer action game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366 --- Comment #20 from Filipe Rosset 2010-03-29 10:25:04 EDT --- Hi Andrea. Spec URL: http://filiperosset.fedorapeople.org/packages/flaw/flaw.spec SRPM URL: http://filiperosset.fedorapeople.org/packages/flaw/flaw-1.2.2-7.fc12.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Mar 29 2010 Filipe Rosset - 1.2.2-7 - Fix spec issues -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549366] Review Request: flaw - Small multiplayer action game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366
--- Comment #21 from Andrea Musuruane 2010-03-29 10:31:03
EDT ---
Filipe, I just noticed you no longer put doc files in
%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} but in %{_docdir}/%{name}. This is wrong,
according to FPG.
Moreover, you must not use %{_datadir}/doc but %{_docdir}.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576673] Review Request: beaker - Automated test system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576673
--- Comment #2 from Bill Peck 2010-03-29 10:22:25 EDT ---
Hello Till,
Thanks for looking at this.
Question about python_sitelib is not declard condtionally. I thought the below
code was conditional.
%{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")}
!? should say if its not defined right?
And for python-devel to python2-devel. Should All python be changed to
python2-*?
Thanks again.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225743] Merge Review: expect
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225743 --- Comment #10 from Daniel Novotny 2010-03-29 09:38:14 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562469] Review Request: openvas-scanner - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562469 --- Comment #19 from Michal Ambroz 2010-03-29 09:25:05 EDT --- If you preffer for review, here are the proposed changes to the package SPEC URL: http://rebus.webz.cz/d/openvas-scanner.spec SRPM URL: http://rebus.webz.cz/d/openvas-scanner-3.0.1-6.fc12.src.rpm Best regards Michal Ambroz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571993] Review Request: non-sequencer - A powerful, real-time, pattern-based MIDI sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571993 Martin Gieseking changed: What|Removed |Added CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2010-03-29 08:51:17 EDT --- Just a couple of quick comments: - according to the source file headers, the license seems to be GPLv2+ - add the following line to the %prep section in order to disable early stripping of debuginfo: sed -i '/^ifneq (\$(USE_DEBUG),yes)/,+4 d' Makefile (alternatively, you can patch the Makefile) - the configure command in the %build section should look like this: %configure --enable-lash - I think, the documentation is extensive enough to put it in a separate doc subpackage - add TODO.mu to %doc $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-12-i386/result/*.rpm non-sequencer.src:38: W: configure-without-libdir-spec non-sequencer.src: W: invalid-url Source0: non-sequencer-20100131gitba94d2c354145.tar.bz2 non-sequencer-debuginfo.i686: E: empty-debuginfo-package 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #6 from Michal Ambroz 2010-03-29 08:24:35 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://rebus.webz.cz/d/skipfish.spec SRPM URL: http://rebus.webz.cz/d/skipfish-1.26-0.2.b.fc12.src.rpm Hello Martin, thank you for the review. >- you can drop "%attr(755,root,root)" from the %files section because the >permissions are set automatically Done >- Directory /usr/share/skipfish/assets contains a file COPYING with the GPL 3.0 >license text. Thanks for noticing that. License is actually LGPLv3. >You should ask upstream whether the images are actually intended >to be licensed under GPLv3. >If so, change the License tag to "ASL 2.0 and GPLv3". Icons are comming from different project so they need to keep different license. Following the licensing guideline I have split skipfish to 2 packages with different licenses (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios) >- Please also upload the SPEC file to your server. > The above SPEC URLs don't work (404). I a sorry for the typo ... it should have been .spec not .SPEC Best regards Michal Ambroz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 568638] Review Request: smx - httpd server macro language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568638
Till Maas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||opensou...@till.name
--- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2010-03-29 08:04:16 EDT ---
This is probably wrong:
strip --strip-unneeded %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/*.so
strip --strip-unneeded %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/smx*
The files are automatically stripped by rpm and the information is stored in
the debuginfo package. When you do this yourself, the debuginfo packages will
be useless.
You can try this to get the rpmlin errors away:
%{_prefix}/share/man/man3/%%*
The %% represents one % in SPEC files.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 568638] Review Request: smx - httpd server macro language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568638 Till Maas changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #396490|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577813] Fedora 13 Alpha x86_64 Produces Blank Screen during installation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577813 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-package-rev...@redha | |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577813] Fedora 13 Alpha x86_64 Produces Blank Screen during installation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577813 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anaconda-maint-l...@redhat. ||com, ||jonat...@jonmasters.org, ||kana...@kanarip.com, ||rc040...@freenet.de Component|Package Review |anaconda AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|anaconda-maint-l...@redhat. ||com --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius 2010-03-29 07:19:58 EDT --- Wrong component, not a package review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225302] Merge Review: automake
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225302 --- Comment #16 from Karsten Hopp 2010-03-29 07:16:54 EDT --- I've fixed the three issues from comment #15 in automake-1.11.1-5.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577813] Fedora 13 Alpha x86_64 Produces Blank Screen during installation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577813 --- Comment #5 from IBM Bug Proxy 2010-03-29 07:02:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=403264) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=403264) VNC Default Paritioning Layout, Anaconda bug report post Packages Installation, and, before reboot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577813] Fedora 13 Alpha x86_64 Produces Blank Screen during installation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577813 --- Comment #4 from IBM Bug Proxy 2010-03-29 07:02:04 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=403263) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=403263) /tmp/syslog when VNC hangs at Partitioning Layout -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577813] Fedora 13 Alpha x86_64 Produces Blank Screen during installation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577813 --- Comment #3 from IBM Bug Proxy 2010-03-29 07:01:57 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=403262) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=403262) /tmp/anaconda-yum.conf when VNC hangs at Partitioning Layout -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577813] Fedora 13 Alpha x86_64 Produces Blank Screen during installation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577813 --- Comment #6 from IBM Bug Proxy 2010-03-29 07:02:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=403265) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=403265) Text Mode Default Paritioning Layout, default Packages, Anaconda bug report pre-installation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577813] Fedora 13 Alpha x86_64 Produces Blank Screen during installation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577813 --- Comment #2 from IBM Bug Proxy 2010-03-29 07:01:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=403261) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=403261) /tmp/anaconda.log when VNC hangs at Partitioning Layout -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577813] New: Fedora 13 Alpha x86_64 Produces Blank Screen during installation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fedora 13 Alpha x86_64 Produces Blank Screen during installation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577813 Summary: Fedora 13 Alpha x86_64 Produces Blank Screen during installation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bugpr...@us.ibm.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- IBM Bug Proxy changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||IBM Linux Technology Center ||61628 =Comment: #0= SUBRATA MODAK > - The Fedora 13 Alpha x86_64 (ISO taken from http://software.linux.ibm.com/pub/fedora/releases/test/13-Alpha/Fedora/x86_64/iso/) produces Blank screen during Installation process. Created the following entry in /boot/grub/menu.lst on an existing Distro: # grub.conf generated by anaconda # # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file # NOTICE: You do not have a /boot partition. This means that # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /, eg. # root (hd1,0) # kernel /boot/vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/sdb1 # initrd /boot/initrd-version.img #boot=/dev/sda default=0 timeout=30 splashimage=(hd1,0)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (2.6.18-190.el5xen) root (hd1,0) kernel /boot/xen.gz-2.6.18-190.el5 crashkernel=1...@32m module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-190.el5xen ro root=LABEL=/1234 rhgb quiet module /boot/initrd-2.6.18-190.el5xen.img title Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server-base (2.6.18-190.el5) root (hd1,0) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-190.el5 ro root=LABEL=/1234 rhgb quiet initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.18-190.el5.img title F13 X86_64 Aplha Installation root (hd1,0) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-f13alpha-installation askmethod vnc ro root=LABEL=/1234 rhgb quiet initrd /boot/initrd-f13alpha-installation When I install, shortly after going through the usual booting up messages, after /sbin/loader and then, detecting hardware, F13 Alpha x86_64 Produces Blank Screen during installation. Tried removing askmethod & vnc arguments, but still it did not work. Regards-- Subrata =Comment: #1= SUBRATA MODAK > - Fedora community mailing list also reported similar issue(s) with other hardwares. However, somebody suggested booting with ACPI=off. I tried the same. Now, i could see a hung screen with the attached BACKTRACE info. Regards-- Subrata =Comment: #2= SUBRATA MODAK > - Backtrace on F13 Alpha Installation =Comment: #3= Edward E. Pollard - could you try booting with acpi=noirq ? What type of hardware is this on other than x86_64? Video card? Machine type/model? processor? =Comment: #4= SUBRATA MODAK > - Even acpi=noirq did not help. =Comment: #5= SUBRATA MODAK > - Here goes the results of much broader testing scenarios: == Kernel-Argsvnc askmethod serial radeon.modeset=0 Serial-Console-Enabled yes Parallel Console-status Screen Shows up VNC Installation YES Modify Partition Layout YES Final Conclusion VNC screen hangs after creating some Layout == Kernel-Argsvnc askmethod serial Serial-Console-Enabled yes Parallel Console-status Blank Screen VNC Installation YES Modify Partition Layout YES Final Conclusion VNC screen hangs after creating some Layout == Kernel-Argsvnc askmethod serial Serial-Console-Enabled yes Parallel Console-status Blank Screen VNC Installation YES Modify Partition Layout NO Final Conclusion Packages Chosen, Bug generated after all Packages were Installed == Kernel-Argsvnc askmethod serial radeon.modeset=0 Serial-Console-Enabled yes Parallel Console-status Screen Shows up VNC Installation YES Modify Partition Layout NO Final Conclusion Packages Chosen, Bug generated after all Packages were Installed =
[Bug 577813] Fedora 13 Alpha x86_64 Produces Blank Screen during installation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577813 --- Comment #1 from IBM Bug Proxy 2010-03-29 07:01:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=403260) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=403260) Backtrace on F13 Alpha Installation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 --- Comment #29 from Matthias Runge 2010-03-29 06:42:54 EDT --- Thank you! I'll set up a CVS request as soon as I can. Since I'm now newly sponsored, I guess I have to wait until the cvs-flag is accessable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 492747] Review Request: django-mptt - A generic MPTT utilities application for Django projects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492747 Till Maas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||opensou...@till.name Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #2 from Till Maas 2010-03-29 06:38:51 EDT --- The spec is still password protected. Please remove NotReady from the Whiteboard, once this is fixed. Also this review request might be closed, if you do not respond within a reasonable timeframe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518857] Review Request: django-extensions - django command line extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518857 Till Maas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||opensou...@till.name Version|12 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 Till Maas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #28 from Till Maas 2010-03-29 06:33:30 EDT --- This looks good, the package is now APPROVED and I added you to the packager group. Your next task is to add a new package CVS request here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests If you have other review requests open, please remove the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker from them. For further questions, feel free to contact me or ask on the devel mailinglist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
