[Bug 576032] Review Request: php-channel-htmlpurifier - Adds htmlpurifier project channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576032 --- Comment #4 from David Nalley 2010-04-01 22:46:24 EDT --- Pavel: I literally copied it from php-channel-symfony. I have no reason to believe that changing the BR to php-pear will not work for modern version of pear. I am working on the problem in comment 1 and should have a reply shortly. (In reply to comment #3) > I think there nothing to formal reviw. I had a look on it. It simple an fine. > > Only one question: > BuildRequires: php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2 > Where you get such version? Why exactly 1:1.4.9-1.2? > Where you got speec-template for channel? Was it one from the packages in > fedora (similar to php-channel-phpunit)? > > Affter resolve initial error on installation I ready approve it. > Please describe how I can reproduсe it and may be I can help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565502] Review Request: python-recaptcha-client - A plugin for reCAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA Mailhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565502 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||python-recaptcha-client-1.0 ||.5-3.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565502] Review Request: python-recaptcha-client - A plugin for reCAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA Mailhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565502 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 22:41:20 EDT --- python-recaptcha-client-1.0.5-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549821] Review Request: dcap - Client Tools for dCache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549821 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|dcap-2.44.0-3.fc12 |dcap-2.44.0-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549821] Review Request: dcap - Client Tools for dCache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549821 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 22:41:35 EDT --- dcap-2.44.0-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549821] Review Request: dcap - Client Tools for dCache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549821 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|dcap-2.44.0-3.el4 |dcap-2.44.0-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542990] Review Request: root - Numerical data analysis framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542990 --- Comment #9 from Suvayu 2010-04-01 22:35:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Amazing software. True but equally amazingly difficult to package. Hence I appreciate Mattias' efforts more than I can express in one comment. I am trying to get a bit more familiar with ROOT and rpmbuild before I can lend a hand. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549821] Review Request: dcap - Client Tools for dCache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549821 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 22:40:02 EDT --- dcap-2.44.0-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542990] Review Request: root - Numerical data analysis framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542990 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior changed: What|Removed |Added CC||henrique...@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-04-01 22:12:25 EDT --- Amazing software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578994] Review Request: abinit - Full-featured atomic-scale first-principles simulation software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578994 Rajesh Krishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Rajesh Krishnan 2010-04-01 21:38:40 EDT --- Tested this with Fedora 12 (x86_64). Also 'rpmlint' did not report any major errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578994] New: Review Request: abinit - Full-featured atomic-scale first-principles simulation software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: abinit - Full-featured atomic-scale first-principles simulation software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578994 Summary: Review Request: abinit - Full-featured atomic-scale first-principles simulation software Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fed...@krishnan.cc QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SPECS/abinit.spec SRPM URL: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SRPMS/abinit-6.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: ABINIT is a package whose main program allows one to find the total energy, charge density and electronic structure of systems made of electrons and nuclei within Density Functional Theory, using pseudo-potentials and a plane-wave basis. Binary URL: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/RPMS/x86_64/abinit-6.0.2-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm Need sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578990] New: Review Request: nimrod - A new statically typed, imperative programming Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nimrod - A new statically typed, imperative programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578990 Summary: Review Request: nimrod - A new statically typed, imperative programming Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fed...@krishnan.cc QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SPECS/nimrod.spec SRPM URL: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SRPMS/nimrod-0.8.8-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: A new statically typed, imperative programming language, that supports procedural, object oriented, functional and generic programming styles while remaining simple and efficient. Additional Notes: Tested this on Fedora 12 (x86_64). Let me know if I need to test it on F13 as well. Also ran 'rpmlint' and did not find any major flaws with both the srpm and spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578990] Review Request: nimrod - A new statically typed, imperative programming Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578990 Rajesh Krishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Rajesh Krishnan 2010-04-01 21:20:17 EDT --- Need sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578981] New: Review Request: libdrizzle - Drizzle Client & Protocol Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libdrizzle - Drizzle Client & Protocol Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578981 Summary: Review Request: libdrizzle - Drizzle Client & Protocol Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wdier...@rackspace.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/libdrizzle.spec SRPM URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/libdrizzle-0.8-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is the the client and protocol library for the Drizzle project. The server, drizzled, will use this as for the protocol library, as well as the client utilities and any new projects that require low-level protocol communication (like proxies). Other language interfaces (PHP extensions, SWIG, ...) should be built off of this interface. Notes: Drizzle itself is not yet at a stable point where it can be added to Fedora, however libdrizzle is stable and will be required by drizzle once ready for production. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 John Beranek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@redux.org.uk --- Comment #61 from John Beranek 2010-04-01 19:40:30 EDT --- One more prod, it would be great to get an EPEL5 branch as pidgin-sipe is especially useful in business environments. I'm willing to help/take on maintainership role. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578620] Review Request: quvi - Command line tool for parsing video download links
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578620 --- Comment #5 from Nicoleau Fabien 2010-04-01 18:33:01 EDT --- Update : Spec URL: http://rpms.nicoleau-fabien.net/SPECS/quvi.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.nicoleau-fabien.net/SRPMS/quvi-0.1.3-2.fc12.src.rpm Changelog : - Licence fix - Merged libquvi and quvi packages I also removed copying file from the devel package. Rpmlint still complain about the URL, and about libquvi in description, so it can be ignored. Fabien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516536] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Jobmanager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516536 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 17:04:00 EDT --- globus-gram-job-manager-10.17-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update globus-gram-job-manager'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gram-job-manager-10.17-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 17:02:30 EDT --- ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-2.1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516536] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Jobmanager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516536 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 17:01:41 EDT --- globus-gram-job-manager-10.17-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update globus-gram-job-manager'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gram-job-manager-10.17-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578941] Review Request: x2goclient-gtk - Client for use with the X2Go network based computing environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578941 --- Comment #1 from Leon Keijser 2010-04-01 17:02:51 EDT --- Unfortunately there's still a bug (or mistake on my part?), preventing me to initiate a connection to an X2Go server. I have reported this upstream by email on 2009-04-01 and awaiting reply. I just wanted to put this review request here, because it might just be a problem on my side. If anyone takes this review, if you can, please test the application's functionality as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||ferm-2.0.7-8.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 17:01:03 EDT --- ferm-2.0.7-8.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #13 from Alexander Boström 2010-04-01 16:00:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > When I build this on my machine I get lots of "Failed to parse" errors when > it's generating the bindings. What do you make of this? Yeah, that worried me too, but according to upstream it's nothing to worry about. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.bindings.java.devel/1459/focus=1460 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578941] New: Review Request: x2goclient-gtk - Client for use with the X2Go network based computing environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: x2goclient-gtk - Client for use with the X2Go network based computing environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578941 Summary: Review Request: x2goclient-gtk - Client for use with the X2Go network based computing environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: keij...@stone-it.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://leon.fedorapeople.org/files/x2goclient-gtk/x2goclient-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://leon.fedorapeople.org/files/x2goclient-gtk/x2goclient-gtk-3.01-8.1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This client will be able to connect to X2Go server(s) and start, stop, resume and terminate (running) desktop sessions. X2Go Client stores different server connections and may automatically request authentication data from LDAP directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550277] Review Request: x2goclient-cli - A command-line client for the x2go system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550277 --- Comment #11 from Leon Keijser 2010-04-01 16:15:53 EDT --- FYI: i've created bug 578941 as a review request for the graphical client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577057] Review Request: perl-HTML-BarGraph - Generate multiset bar graphs using plain HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577057 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 15:34:10 EDT --- perl-HTML-BarGraph-0.5-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTML-BarGraph'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-BarGraph-0.5-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576147] Review Request: rekollect - A note taking and note management application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576147 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 15:31:04 EDT --- rekollect-0.3.1-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rekollect'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rekollect-0.3.1-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577058] Review Request: perl-SVG-TT-Graph - Base object for generating SVG Graphs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577058 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 15:34:34 EDT --- perl-SVG-TT-Graph-0.12-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-SVG-TT-Graph'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-SVG-TT-Graph-0.12-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 507585] Review Request: python-PSI - Shows real time system information in python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 15:31:42 EDT --- python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-PSI'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 --- Comment #35 from Matthias Runge 2010-04-01 15:28:46 EDT --- Off course, here comes the corrected CVS Request: New Package CVS Request === Package Name: django-lint Short Description: Django Lint is a static analysis tool that checks (or "lints") projects and applications that use the Django web development framework. Owners: mrunge Branches: F-12 F-13 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #60 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 15:29:02 EDT --- pidgin-sipe-1.9.1-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575332] Review Request: qbzr - Bazaar plugin for Qt interface to most Bazaar operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575332 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 15:29:52 EDT --- qbzr-0.18.4-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qbzr'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qbzr-0.18.4-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||pidgin-sipe-1.9.1-1.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578620] Review Request: quvi - Command line tool for parsing video download links
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578620 --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking 2010-04-01 15:08:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > About the package name, as the main goal of this package is to provide libquvi > (quvi binary is more like a test tool than a real application), should I name > the package 'libquvi' or keep using juset 'quvi' ? Hi Fabien (sorry for previously mixing up your names), according to the naming guidelines, the package name should match that of the upstream project and/or tarball. Since both are "quvi", you should go with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578620] Review Request: quvi - Command line tool for parsing video download links
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578620 --- Comment #3 from Nicoleau Fabien 2010-04-01 14:44:44 EDT --- Hello Martin, I'll update my pacakge according to your suggestions. About the package name, as the main goal of this package is to provide libquvi (quvi binary is more like a test tool than a real application), should I name the package 'libquvi' or keep using juset 'quvi' ? I think that libquvi is better. Fabien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578701] RFE - Include Pinta in Repos
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578701 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sebast...@when.com --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Dziallas 2010-04-01 14:19:35 EDT --- ...and he'd appreciate a review over there. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578886] Review Request: likewise-open - Join to Active Directory and securely authenticate users.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578886 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2010-04-01 13:27:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I'm somewhat surprised that likewise.com doesn't have any web space at all > that > you could use to put up a couple of packages. If that's really the case, let > me know and I'll get you set up with something. > > You might also take a look at the older ticket, which was closed because the > submitter, also seemingly an employee of likewise) failed to respond to review > commentary. Perhaps there are some relevant comments there. Actually, there is a dedicated site from Likewise folks: http://archives.likewise.com/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566725] Review Request: GDCM - Grassroots DiCoM is a C++ library to reading/parsing and writing DICOM medical files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566725
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de
Bug 566725 depends on bug 566729, which changed state.
Bug 566729 Summary: Review Request: CharLS - An optimized implementation of the
JPEG-LS standard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566729
What|Old Value |New Value
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution||ERRATA
--- Comment #6 from Martin Gieseking 2010-04-01
13:28:28 EDT ---
Hi Mario,
your package currently doesn't build in mock because of two missing BRs:
BuildRequires: tex(latex)
BuildRequires: graphviz
These are required for building the PDF (doxygen) documentation.
Some further comments:
- in the %files sections, you can drop the %dir lines
- the man pages should be added with %{_mandir}/man1/*.1*
- fix the changlog format according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578886] Review Request: likewise-open - Join to Active Directory and securely authenticate users.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578886 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-04-01 13:16:50 EDT --- I'm somewhat surprised that likewise.com doesn't have any web space at all that you could use to put up a couple of packages. If that's really the case, let me know and I'll get you set up with something. You might also take a look at the older ticket, which was closed because the submitter, also seemingly an employee of likewise) failed to respond to review commentary. Perhaps there are some relevant comments there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 568833] Review Request: OpenLP - Church projection software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568833
Nils Philippsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #15 from Nils Philippsen 2010-04-01 13:14:08
EDT ---
I'll simply work through the points at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines :
Items marked "GOOD" or "PASS" fulfil the guidelines or they don't apply to this
package.
Items marked "CHECK" aren't covered by the guidelines but you should check and
fix them anyway in my opinion.
Items marked "BAD" violate the guidelines in some point and need to be fixed.
- GOOD: rpmlint on source package passes:
n...@gibraltar:~/devel/fedora-review/OpenLP> rpmlint OpenLP-1.9.1-1.src.rpm
OpenLP.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/OpenLP/OpenLP-1.9.1.tar.gz HTTP Error 302: The
HTTP server returned a redirect error that would lead to an infinite loop.
The last 30x error message was:
Found
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
-> I've downloaded the tarball earlier and manually verified that the source
RPM is the same as upstream.
- BAD: rpmlint on noarch package prints warnings/errors:
n...@gibraltar:~/devel/fedora-review/OpenLP> rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/OpenLP-1.9.1-1.noarch.rpm
OpenLP.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/OpenLP-1.9.1/pyqt-sql-py2exe.txt
OpenLP.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openlp/plugins/remotes/remoteclient.py 0644
/usr/bin/env
OpenLP.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openlp/.version
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
-> convert the doc file to UTF-8 before installing
-> remove the interpreter hashbang line from the non-executable python module
-> The way openlp determines its version seems awfully complicated to me. If I
were in your place, rather than putting it in a hidden file in the python
module directory, I'd store it as a normal python variable in an openlp.version
module which could be generated while installing (there you could check for
bazaar versions and whatnot).
- GOOD: package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
- GOOD: spec file name matches package name
- CHECK: The summary is really long, probably get rid of "Open Source" (kinda
implied in Fedora).
- BAD/CHECK: The description contains information not necessary for someone
installing the Fedora package (we didn't have the old openlp.org software,
neither is there Powerpoint on Fedora). You could clarify and condense this a
good bit (and avoid any trademark issues) if it were phrased like this (wrapped
at 80 chars/line of course):
OpenLP is a church presentation and lyrics projection program, used to display
song texts, Bible verses,
videos and images using a computer and a beamer.
I don't know if it can use openoffice.org for displaying presentations, if yes,
just re-add that part (preferably without mentioning Powerpoint).
- GOOD: package licensed properly
- GOOD: license field matches actual license (GPLv2)
- GOOD: license text included in package
- GOOD: spec file written in American English
- GOOD: spec file is legible
- GOOD: source RPM tarball matches upstream
- GOOD: package builds in mock
- GOOD: all build requirements listed
- PASS: No locales included (see below, though).
- PASS: no libraries
- GOOD: no bundled system libraries
- GOOD: no relocation
- BAD: Doesn't own all directories it creates: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/... are
contained in the hicolor-icon-theme package -> please add hicolor-icon-theme as
a dependency.
- GOOD: doesn't list files more than once
- GOOD: permissions set properly
- GOOD: has %clean
- GOOD: consistently uses macros
- GOOD: package contains code
- PASS/CHECK: no large documentation. You might want to include only files that
have actual content, though -- PluginDevelopersGuide.txt is pretty empty. Feel
free to leave this in if you're confident that this will get filled in time for
2.0 ;-).
- GOOD: %doc files don't affect runtime
- PASS: no header files
- PASS: no static libraries
- PASS: no devel libraries
- PASS: no -devel subpackage
- GOOD: no libtool archives
- GOOD: contains desktop file, gets installed properly
- GOOD: cleans buildroot at %install
- GOOD: all filenames are valid UTF-8
Following some other things I noticed that you might want to check even though
they're not covered by guidelines:
- CHECK: It would be good if the package was localized, i.e. contained
translations so people speaking other languages could use it.
- CHECK: I think you should add a disttag to your release, e.g. "1%{?dist}", so
that you can build the same version/release for different Fedora versions. Mind
that you could have different python directories/major ver
[Bug 488618] Review Request: Likewise Open - Likewise Active Directory Authentication Services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-04-01 13:14:11 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 578886 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578701] RFE - Include Pinta in Repos
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578701 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-04-01 13:10:57 EDT --- Even better, someone already submitted this for review. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 569038 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578886] Review Request: likewise-open - Join to Active Directory and securely authenticate users.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578886 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krish...@likewise.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-04-01 13:14:11 EDT --- *** Bug 488618 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569038] Review Request: pinta - Simple painting for Gtk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569038 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dles...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-04-01 13:10:57 EDT --- *** Bug 578701 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578886] New: Review Request: likewise-open - Join to Active Directory and securely authenticate users.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: likewise-open - Join to Active Directory and securely authenticate users. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578886 Summary: Review Request: likewise-open - Join to Active Directory and securely authenticate users. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ssal...@likewise.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: Need hosting space SRPM URL: Need hosting space Description: This is my first package and I'll need a sponser -- I have an account (ssalley) at fedorapeople.org but don't seem to have upload rights. likewise-open joins Unix, Linux, and Mac machines to Microsoft Active Directory and securely authenticates users. This package is intended for Fedora 12. This is the first version to support SELinux -- we've previously asked users to disable SELinux. We now have a policy in Fedora 12 and Fedora 13 and apply contexts to home directories when they are created. The build system Likewise uses is quite ugly (I'm a Likewise employee) as we support many different versions of Unix and have to sometimes create 'fat' packages to support 32/64-bit components in one package. I've done my best to shoehorn this into the RPM build system and to package the results in standard way. The source code comes from a git repository (git://git.likewiseopen.org/likewise-open.git) mirrored off of a (internal to Likewise) Subversion repository. This release corresponds to revision 42111 in the subversion system (subversion revisions are visible in the git repository). Patches are applied and are mostly related to positioning files for the FHS as we generally drop things in /opt/likewise. I have a patch for supporting SELinux that has not yet been integrated upstream. Components from OpenLDAP and Kerberos are also included as private components (/usr/lib/likewise-open). We regularly submit patches to these projects, but it can take a while for them to get accepted (I believe the changes we need are already in the packages for Fedora 13). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 568833] Review Request: OpenLP - Church projection software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568833 Nils Philippsen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nphil...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nphil...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 --- Comment #34 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-04-01 11:41:34 EDT --- Would it be possible to get a better short description than "summary of package"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571364] Review Request: man-db - Database cached manual pager suit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571364
--- Comment #7 from Miloslav Trmač 2010-04-01 11:37:55 EDT ---
rpmlint:
> man-db.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US whatis -> whats, what's,
> what is
> (other "spelling error" warnings, some bogus, some correct)
> man-db.src:34: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
This doesn't seem to be a problem... but see below about %configure
> man-db.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.5.7-1 ['2.5.7-5.fc12',
> '2.5.7-5']
Trivial to fix.
%doc must include docs/COPYING*. Other files to consider: doc/HACKING,
doc/TODO, ChangeLog, NEWS; I think including at least NEWS would be useful.
I'm not sure about "Provides: man = %{version}": at the very least it should
be "%{version}-%{release}".
Requires: crontabs should be added to handle /etc/cron.daily ownership.
man-db should own /usr/libexec/man-db
Wouldn't it be cleaner to use %configure than to use --with-config-file and
make CC= ?
Please use only one of %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, and %global instead of
%define.
PackagingGuidelines recommend adding BuildRequires: gettext.
Consider using (make install INSTALL='install -p' ...) to preserve timestamps.
"All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment"
Would it make sense to use /etc/sysconfig/man-db instead of adding new options
to /etc/man_db.conf ? For example, if upstream ever tightened the parser to
reject invalid values, Fedora would have to loosen the checking again.
Is the man-pages-de translation of man-db man pages better? Knowing nothing
(and not having looked), I'd assume the man pages shipped with the project
would be more likely to be up-to-date.
"install -d m 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{cache}" seems to be missing a '-' before
'm'.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571364] Review Request: man-db - Database cached manual pager suit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571364 --- Comment #8 from Miloslav Trmač 2010-04-01 11:38:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=404027) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=404027) Some spelling fixes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mru...@matthias-runge.de Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #32 from Matthias Runge 2010-04-01 10:37:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: django-lint Short Description: summary of package Owners: mrunge Branches: F-12 F-13 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 --- Comment #33 from Matthias Runge 2010-04-01 10:39:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > You need to use your @matthias-runge.de e-mail address here in Bugzilla to get > your bugzilla privileges and then set the fedora-cvs flag to "?". Or you need > to request at https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ to use your > @fedoraproject.org to sync the Bugzilla privs from FAS to Bugzilla. Till, thanks again. Your hint solved my problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576153] Review Request: gnome-icon-theme-extras - Additional GNOME icons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576153 Bastien Nocera changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Bastien Nocera 2010-04-01 10:23:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gnome-icon-theme-extras Short Description: Additional GNOME icons Owners: hadess Branches: F-12 F-13 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578701] RFE - Include Pinta in Repos
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578701 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-04-01 10:19:42 EDT --- Unfortunately this was opened as a package review ticket, and I see no package to review so I've no choice but to close this ticket. The package review procedure should be used only if you are actually offering to maintain a package and are actually submitting a completed package for review. If you wish to request that packages be added to the distribution, please edit the wishlist at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576153] Review Request: gnome-icon-theme-extras - Additional GNOME icons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576153 Benjamin Otte changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Benjamin Otte 2010-04-01 10:18:23 EDT --- Yeah, I noticed already that CC licenses don't have a version in Fedora. Weird thing that. WIth that fixed, the package is accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529181] Review Request: nautilus-flickr-uploader - Simple GUI to upload pics to Flickr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529181 Thomas Kowaliczek changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(ch...@tylers.info ||) --- Comment #9 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2010-04-01 10:20:17 EDT --- Chris will you bring the review to the end? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 511107] Review Request: rhythmbox-equalizer - An Equalizer plugin for Rhythmbox
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511107 Thomas Kowaliczek changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(hicham.haou...@gm ||ail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576153] Review Request: gnome-icon-theme-extras - Additional GNOME icons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576153 --- Comment #5 from Bastien Nocera 2010-04-01 10:02:22 EDT --- License tag fixed in: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gnome-icon-theme-extras/gnome-icon-theme-extras-2.29.0-4.fc12.src.rpm http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gnome-icon-theme-extras/gnome-icon-theme-extras.spec Note that the short name doesn't include the version: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578620] Review Request: quvi - Command line tool for parsing video download links
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578620
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de
--- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2010-04-01
09:44:31 EDT ---
Hi Nicoleau,
just some initial comments on your package:
- According to the source file header, the license is GPLv3+, not GPLv3 only.
- I suggest to put the library into the base package and drop libquivi since
both packages are rather small. The name of the devel package would then become
quivi-devel.
- In the %files section, replace %{name}.1.gz with %{name}.1*. It's better not
to rely on a specific compression format.
- Don't add file COPYING several times. It's sufficient to place it in the base
package.
- add a blank line before %changelog :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 --- Comment #31 from Till Maas 2010-04-01 09:31:57 EDT --- You need to use your @matthias-runge.de e-mail address here in Bugzilla to get your bugzilla privileges and then set the fedora-cvs flag to "?". Or you need to request at https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ to use your @fedoraproject.org to sync the Bugzilla privs from FAS to Bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571364] Review Request: man-db - Database cached manual pager suit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571364 Miloslav Trmač changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554464] Review Request: python-pebl - Python Environment for Bayesian Learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554464 Tadej Janež changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(tadej.ja...@tadej | |.hicsalta.si) | --- Comment #5 from Tadej Janež 2010-04-01 09:26:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > What should I do with _network.c and _cpd.c, which give me rpmlint errors: > > python-pebl.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pebl/_network.c > > python-pebl.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pebl/_cpd.c > > If they are required at runtime, leave them in the main package. > If they don't, I'd propably delete them. Ok, I deleted them from the package. > > Neither of IPython1 and PyXg are included in Fedora, however, they are not > > necessary for running the program. Should I make a README.package file > > describing the situation or should I mention this in the summary of the > > package. What do you think? > > If the programm does not crash, if they are not installed, I'd mention in the > spec file as a comment for you, that this are optional packages. I created a README.Fedora file describing the situation with PyXg and IPython1. (In reply to comment #4) > > When there is 'lib' in the name, rpmlint will complain about, but here > requiring python-matplotlib is ok. Ok, I'll just ignore that. > > By the way: Any progress? Yes, sorry for my late reply. I'm in contact with the upstream author and he will release version 1.0.2 with all the fixes needed for easier packaging of Pebl in Fedora. Check out the new .spec and README.Fedora files at http://tadej.fedorapeople.org/. There is also the python-pebl-1.0.2-2.fc12.src.rpm, which contains a "preview" of the pebl-1.0.2.tar.gz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 --- Comment #30 from Matthias Runge 2010-04-01 09:19:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: django-lint Short Description: summary of package Owners: mrunge Branches: F-12 F-13 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578759] Review request: django-mako - Mako Templates Plugin for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578759 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) 2010-04-01 08:16:19 EDT --- oops sorry forgot to edit my review template I mean - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM django-mako.src: E: invalid-spec-name Your spec filename must end with '.spec'. If it's not the case, rename your file and rebuild your package. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578759#c0, SPEC file included in SRPM is django-moko.spec which should be django-mako.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521152] Review Request: mysql-workbench - MySQL gui tool for database modelling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521152 Gianluca Sforna changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gia...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Gianluca Sforna 2010-04-01 07:52:34 EDT --- I'd be interested in reviewing this one; I rebuilt the srpm and noticed the program does not work (at least, not in my F12) failing to connect to the DB with: Test connect failed Couldn't load library libmysqlclient_r.so: libmysqlclient_r.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I don't think trying to load the .so is quite right, I need to check what's going on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578759] Review request: django-mako - Mako Templates Plugin for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578759 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2010-04-01 07:30:35 EDT --- rpmlint is out of mind, or is it me? spec file name is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572511] Review Request: mythes - thesaurus library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572511 Caolan McNamara changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Caolan McNamara 2010-04-01 07:15:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mythes Short Description: Thesaurus library Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574053] Review Request: hyphen-tk - Turkmen hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574053 Caolan McNamara changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2010-04-01 07:14:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hyphen-tk Short Description: Turkmen hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572511] Review Request: mythes - thesaurus library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572511 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2010-04-01 07:15:01 EDT --- "change existing mythes-* spec files to remove ownership of /usr/share/mythes" yeah, that's the plan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578759] Review request: django-mako - Mako Templates Plugin for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578759 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review request: django-make |Review request: django-mako |- Mako Templates Plugin for |- Mako Templates Plugin for |Django |Django -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578759] Review request: django-make - Mako Templates Plugin for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578759 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) 2010-04-01 06:14:04 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2088635 - rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. django-mako.src: E: invalid-spec-name Your spec filename must end with '.spec'. If it's not the case, rename your file and rebuild your package. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 23caac692fdf7fec6edb0fb46ccf464fa4043df0 django-mako-0.1.3.tar.gz Suggestions: 1) Change spec file name to correct upstream project name django-mako.spec 2) Please go through updated packaging guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python Resubmit new SPEC and SRPM according to updated python packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578759] Review request: django-make - Mako Templates Plugin for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578759 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2010-04-01 06:05:36 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2088619 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578759] New: Review request: django-make - Mako Templates Plugin for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: django-make - Mako Templates Plugin for Django https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578759 Summary: Review request: django-make - Mako Templates Plugin for Django Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpan...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/django-moko.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/django-mako-0.1.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Replacement for default template system provided by Django. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561243] Review Request: meshlab - A system for processing and editing unstructured 3D triangular meshes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de
--- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2010-04-01
04:58:54 EDT ---
Hi Eric,
you've done a good job setting up this big package. Here are a couple of things
I've noticed so far:
- change the Source0 URL to
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/MeshLabSrc_v122.tar.gz
(see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net)
- the following doc files use the ISO-8859-1 character set:
meshlab/docs/contrib_Gangemi_Vannini.txt
meshlab/docs/contrib_Buzzelli_Mazzanti.txt
convert them to UTF-8, e.g. with:
cd meshlab/docs/
for f in contrib_Gangemi_Vannini.txt contrib_Buzzelli_Mazzanti.txt; do
iconv -fiso88591 -tutf8 $f >$f.new
touch -r $f $f.new
mv $f.new $f
done
- I suggest to add trailing slashes after folder names in the %files section:
%{_libdir}/meshlab/
%{_datadir}/meshlab/
This way it's easier to see that directories are added and not single files
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578701] New: RFE - Include Pinta in Repos
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: RFE - Include Pinta in Repos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578701 Summary: RFE - Include Pinta in Repos Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dles...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Pinta, a simple Mono-based GTK paint program, is being actively developed and has just released version 0.2. It fills the niche for a simple painting and image editing program for GNOME/GTK that is not currently being fulfilled by any program. See this site: http://www.pinta-project.com/ for more information. I think we should consider adding it to the repos to encourage development of it. According to the website, "Pinta is licensed under the MIT X11 open source license." Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Pinta 0.2 How reproducible: NA Steps to Reproduce: NA Actual results: NA Expected results: NA Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
