[Bug 572233] Review Request: compat-tracker - Compatibilty libraries and tools for tracker-0.6.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572233 --- Comment #29 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2010-04-25 04:11:28 EDT --- Why do we need this compat package at all if everything was fixed to rebuild against the current tracker? IMHO, we should just issue a grouped update with everything and forget about the compat package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583672] Review Request: tomtom - A CLI interface to Tomboy or Gnote via dbus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583672 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||methe...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2010-04-25 04:36:11 EDT --- Ankur, Please pull in the patch from upstream that drop the dependency on latest setuptools as well as python-dbus and submit the new spec and srpm for review. Gabriel Filion. It would be nice if you do regular releases as source archives and have a place to report bugs. You might also consider registering in transifex.net for L10N infrastructure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572233] Review Request: compat-tracker - Compatibilty libraries and tools for tracker-0.6.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572233 --- Comment #30 from Hicham HAOUARI hicham.haou...@gmail.com 2010-04-25 06:21:59 EDT --- no, paperbox was fixed to rebuild with old tracker (aka 0.6.x series ), and it is the package this compat is created for. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562469] Review Request: openvas-scanner - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562469 --- Comment #42 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz 2010-04-25 07:23:17 EDT --- Hello guys, I have patched scripts for downloading the NVT feed to use separate nvt and gsf plugin directories to separate it from plugins we deliver with the package. Update is in cvs of all branches now (F-12, F-13, devel, EL-5) I have rebuild openvas-scanner for F12 and devel. Submitted it to F12 updates via bodhi. Rebuild for F13 was not possible, bacause openvas-libraries package is still in F13 update-testing and I am not able to find a way how to build against it. Rebuild for EL-5 was not possible at this point as we do not have branch for openvas-libraties for EL-5. Best regards Michal Ambroz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551857] Review Request: fwsnort - Translates Snort rules into equivalent iptables rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551857 --- Comment #15 from Guillermo Gómez guillermo.go...@gmail.com 2010-04-25 07:58:17 EDT --- Done... macros use improved for consistency on release 6 rpmlint output $ rpmlint -i fwsnort.spec fwsnort-1.0.6-6.fc12.src.rpm fwsnort.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) iptables - potables, portables, timetables The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. fwsnort.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iptables - potables, portables, timetables The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. fwsnort.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ruleset - rule set, rule-set, ruler The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. spec url: http://gomix.fedorapeople.org/fwsnort/fwsnort.spec srpm url: http://gomix.fedorapeople.org/fwsnort/fwsnort-1.0.6-6.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #15 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz 2010-04-25 08:25:59 EDT --- I have added request to openvas-client bugzila to consider adding of the symlinks as it is done in fedora (and debian) package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583186] Review Request: python3-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583186 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||python3-chardet-2.0.1-2.fc1 ||3 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583186] Review Request: python3-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583186 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-25 09:49:51 EDT --- python3-chardet-2.0.1-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575504] Review Request: metagoofil - Metadata analyzer, information gathering tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575504 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|metagoofil-1.4a-4.fc13 |metagoofil-1.4a-5.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575504] Review Request: metagoofil - Metadata analyzer, information gathering tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575504 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-25 09:51:32 EDT --- metagoofil-1.4a-5.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567027] Review Request: flowcanvas - Interactive widget for boxes and lines environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567027 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||flowcanvas-0.6.0-1.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 582864] Review Request: qtlockedfile - QFile extension with advisory locking functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582864 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-25 09:56:46 EDT --- qtlockedfile-2.4-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567027] Review Request: flowcanvas - Interactive widget for boxes and lines environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567027 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-25 09:53:11 EDT --- flowcanvas-0.6.0-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577601] Review Request: libqxt - Qt extension library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577601 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-25 09:53:41 EDT --- libqxt-0.6.0-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 582864] Review Request: qtlockedfile - QFile extension with advisory locking functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582864 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||qtlockedfile-2.4-2.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 585336] Review Request: perl-Sys-CPU - Getting CPU information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585336 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2010-04-25 10:46:18 EDT --- Only one problem here. There is not specified license by upstream. Please tell me, where you find it or ask upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-25 12:23:13 EDT --- java-gnome-4.0.15-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-gnome-4.0.15-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-25 12:23:05 EDT --- java-gnome-4.0.15-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-gnome-4.0.15-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 584111] Review Request: cmatrix - Simulate the display from The Matrix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584111
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi
Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Summary|Review Request: Cmatrix |Review Request: cmatrix -
|shows a Matrix like screen |Simulate the display from
||The Matrix
--- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2010-04-25 12:26:22
EDT ---
Be sure to go through the Fedora guidelines, most importantly of which
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
Additionally to the Packaging Guidelines, there are a bunch of language /
application specific guidelines that are linked to in the Packaging Guidelines.
Here are some tricks of the trade:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues
**
Notes:
- increment the release every time you make changes to the spec file, also
during the review process. This makes it easier for others to see what has been
done.
- your changelog does not adhere to the changelog format, you need to add the
release. (See packaging guidelines) Also, add an empty line inbetween different
changelog entries.
- Use
make %{?_smp_mflags}
instead of
make
to enable SMP build.
- Drop explicit Requires: ncurses. This is automatically picked up by rpm.
- I suggest changing Source: to Source0.
- Use %{version} macro in source line, i.e.
http://www.asty.org/cmatrix/dist/cmatrix-1.2a.tar.gz
should be
http://www.asty.org/cmatrix/dist/cmatrix-%{version}.tar.gz
- Don't duplicate the name in the summary. The summary should be:
Simulate the display from The Matrix
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567086] Review Request: VXL - C++ Libraries for Computer Vision Research and Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567086 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Bouffon thomas.bouf...@gmail.com 2010-04-25 12:32:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=408977) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=408977) More complete build Hi, I packaged vxl with the following options : %cmake -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=ON \ -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=ON \ -DBUILD_TESTING:BOOL=OFF \ -DVXL_FORCE_B3P_EXPAT:BOOL=OFF \ -DVXL_FORCE_V3P_DCMTK:BOOL=OFF \ -DVXL_FORCE_V3P_GEOTIFF:BOOL=OFF \ -DVXL_FORCE_V3P_JPEG:BOOL=OFF \ -DVXL_FORCE_V3P_MPEG2:BOOL=OFF \ -DVXL_FORCE_V3P_PNG:BOOL=OFF \ -DVXL_FORCE_V3P_TIFF:BOOL=OFF \ -DVXL_FORCE_V3P_ZLIB:BOOL=OFF \ -DVXL_FORCE_V3P_RPLY:BOOL=OFF \ -DBUILD_OXL:BOOL=ON \ -DBUILD_CORE_ALL:BOOL=ON \ -DBUILD_CONTRIB:BOOL=ON \ -DBUILD_EXAMPLES:BOOL=OFF \ -DBUILD_TESTING:BOOL=OFF \ -DBUILD_DOCUMENTATION:BOOL=ON \ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=Release All the core libs + the contribs are built It hasn't any dependency which is not provided by the default repos. Cheers, Thomas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583978] Review Request: minitube - native YouTube client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583978 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2010-04-25 12:29:26 EDT --- Gnash is in Fedora.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 580830] Review Request: Clish - Command Line Interface Shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580830 --- Comment #7 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2010-04-25 13:26:34 EDT --- The use of %configure is correct, no need to add --prefix. The updated spec looks better, however please add a proper changelog so it's possible to follow what you have done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 585707] New: Review Request: guayadeque - Music player based on wxWidgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: guayadeque - Music player based on wxWidgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585707 Summary: Review Request: guayadeque - Music player based on wxWidgets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pawelpogorzel...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/146266/Fedora_Packages/guayadeque.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/146266/Fedora_Packages/guayadeque-0.2.5-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Music Player with the aims to be intuitive, easy to use and fast even for huge music collections. Developed for Linux with wxWidgets for GTK under Gnome. This is my first package try and I seek a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563844] Review Request: zim - A Desktop Wiki Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #35 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-04-25 14:19:40 EDT --- Okay, reapproving. - This package (zim) is APPROVED by mtasaka - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563318] Review Request: ceph - User space components of the CEPH file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563318
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Dieter jdie...@gmail.com 2010-04-25 14:25:55 EDT
---
Key:
X - Good
- - Not so good
N/A - Not applicable
[ - ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package
Aside from non-existent spelling mistakes, the only thing that
comes up is:
ceph.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/librados.so.1.0.0 e...@glibc_2.2.5
ceph.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/librados.so.1.0.0 _e...@glibc_2.2.5
ceph.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/libceph.so.1.0.0 e...@glibc_2.2.5
ceph.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/libceph.so.1.0.0 _e...@glibc_2.2.5
If we could try to track this down, it would be nice, as this
really isn't recommended.
[ X ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines
[ X ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
[ X ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
[ X ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license
and meet the Licensing Guidelines
LGPLv2
[ X ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the
actual license
[ - ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of
the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc
I see that you included COPYING only in the -devel package. I
think it should be included in *every* package, based on the above
text (though it is a bit ambiguous).
[ X ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[ X ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[ X ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL.
sha256sum:
20e311c97e761017cdbbad13ab06bc6694338871832579bd51203173535ed796
[ - ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary
rpms on at least one primary architecture
When I try to build this package in Fedora 13 x86_64, I get the
following:
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib64/libhadoopcephfs.so
/usr/lib64/libhadoopcephfs.so.1
/usr/lib64/libhadoopcephfs.so.1.0.0
[N/A] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on
an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the
spec in ExcludeArch.
[ X ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[N/A] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[ X ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's
default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[N/A] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review.
[ - ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does
not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package
which does create that directory.
You create %{_libdir}/ceph, but don't own it.
[ X ] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
[ X ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should
be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section
must include a %defattr(...) line.
[ X ] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[ X ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[ X ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[N/A] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[ X ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[ X ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[N/A] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[N/A] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires:
pkgconfig'.
[ X ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix)
must go in a -devel package.
[ X ] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the
base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
[ X ] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must
be removed in the spec if they are built.
[N/A] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a
%{name}.desktop file.
[ X ] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by
[Bug 563318] Review Request: ceph - User space components of the CEPH file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563318
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Dieter jdie...@gmail.com 2010-04-25 14:31:37
EDT ---
A spec file which includes COPYING in every package, includes
libhadoopcephfs.so*, owns %{_libdir}/ceph and fixes the description for the
fuse client is available at:
http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/ceph.spec
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563318] Review Request: ceph - User space components of the CEPH file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563318 --- Comment #11 from Fabian Deutsch fabian.deut...@gmx.de 2010-04-25 14:37:46 EDT --- Re(In reply to comment #9) [ - ] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. I've been unable to test that it builds in mock, but according to the previous comment, it appears that it doesn't. I just did a plain rpmrebuild outside of mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583672] Review Request: tomtom - A CLI interface to Tomboy or Gnote via dbus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583672 --- Comment #3 from Gabriel Filion lelu...@gmail.com 2010-04-25 14:54:25 EDT --- Rahul Sundaram, The project is hosted on github and tags are listed in the download section. They can be downloaded as .tar.gz archives: http://github.com/lelutin/tomtom/downloads Also, I use the issues section of the site for bug reports: http://github.com/lelutin/tomtom/issues For translation, I'm thinking of subscribing to such a site soon. But for now, I didn't set the foundations for l10n in the code (the english text is hardcoded, it doesn't go through gettext). So, I'll try and set this up for the next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 585719] New: Review Request: wxformbuilder - The OpenSource wxWidgets Designer, GUI Builder, and RAD Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wxformbuilder - The OpenSource wxWidgets Designer, GUI Builder, and RAD Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585719 Summary: Review Request: wxformbuilder - The OpenSource wxWidgets Designer, GUI Builder, and RAD Tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alain.por...@univ-montp2.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dionysos.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/wxformbuilder.spec SRPM URL: http://dionysos.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/wxformbuilder-3.1.68-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: wxFormBuilder aims to be an application that as well as enabling visual development and generating the corresponding code, allow the inclusion of non-graphical components, as well as providing facilities for extending the set of widgets easily via plugins, like other applications such as qt-designer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 584111] Review Request: cmatrix - Simulate the display from The Matrix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584111
--- Comment #8 from ayush.ha...@gmail.com 2010-04-25 14:57:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Be sure to go through the Fedora guidelines, most importantly of which
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
Additionally to the Packaging Guidelines, there are a bunch of language /
application specific guidelines that are linked to in the Packaging
Guidelines.
Here are some tricks of the trade:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues
**
Notes:
- increment the release every time you make changes to the spec file, also
during the review process. This makes it easier for others to see what has
been
done.
- your changelog does not adhere to the changelog format, you need to add the
release. (See packaging guidelines) Also, add an empty line inbetween
different
changelog entries.
- Use
make %{?_smp_mflags}
instead of
make
to enable SMP build.
- Drop explicit Requires: ncurses. This is automatically picked up by rpm.
- I suggest changing Source: to Source0.
- Use %{version} macro in source line, i.e.
http://www.asty.org/cmatrix/dist/cmatrix-1.2a.tar.gz
should be
http://www.asty.org/cmatrix/dist/cmatrix-%{version}.tar.gz
- Don't duplicate the name in the summary. The summary should be:
Simulate the display from The Matrix
Thanks Jussi for the comments.
I'd edited the spec file as commented by you included rpmlint output in
another file .
SRPM URL : http://hakmn.fedorapeople.org/cmatrix-1.2a-2.src.rpm
SPEC URL : http://hakmn.fedorapeople.org/cmatrix.spec
RPMLINT o/p URL : http://hakmn.fedorapeople.org/rpmlint-cmatrix
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - BitTorrent Tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 --- Comment #60 from Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-25 14:57:16 EDT --- http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/opentracker/opentracker-0-0.12.20100410cvs.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 476056] Review Request: gnustep-back - The GNUstep backend library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476056 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||585721 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574506] Review Request: python26-distribute - the Distribute fork of setuptools for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574506 Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2010-04-25 15:36:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python26-distribute Short Description: the Distribute fork of setuptools for the python26 EPEL package Owners: dmalcolm Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: Note: this package is intended purely for EPEL, not for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574531] Review Request: python26-nose - The nose testing package for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574531 --- Comment #2 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2010-04-25 15:54:51 EDT --- Thanks! Updated specfile: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-nose.spec Updated SRPM: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-nose-0.11.1-3.el5.src.rpm Diff of specfile since comment #0: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-nose-from-0.11.1-2-to-0.11.1-3.diff rpmlint output is as before (modulo the release change): python26-nose.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.11.1-3 0.11.1-3.el5 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 585719] Review Request: wxformbuilder - The OpenSource wxWidgets Designer, GUI Builder, and RAD Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585719
Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-25
16:18:35 EDT ---
Just a few comments:
- You need to write in the specfile, how you got the sources and not 'I did
something and here they are'.
e.g. there is a nice snipped /usr/bin/fedora-getsvn, maybe that's the easiest
way:
'fedora-getsvn wxformbuilder $URL-TOSVN $REV'
- You could do %{__mkdir} -p
%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/mimetypes
Instead all the mkdirs above
- You should not use a vendor tag:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566983] Review Request: pulsecaster - A PulseAudio-based podcast recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566983 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 584111] Review Request: cmatrix - Simulate the display from The Matrix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584111
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2010-04-25 17:31:16
EDT ---
- The line
%define version 1.2a
is redundant. The Version tag already defines the macro %{version}.
- The line
%{_mandir}/*/*
is a bit too general. Be more verbose. Use wildcards only when necessary, since
they may end up owning things that they're not supposed to.
- The original spec you used was 1.2a-1. Your first should have been 1.2a-2,
and the second one 1.2a-3. So the next version-release should be 1.2a-4.
Rectify this.
- When you do the above, indicate what you have changed in the releases in the
changelog.
- Note that the changelog is still not in the correct format. See
fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 --- Comment #32 from Henry Kroll nos...@thenerdshow.com 2010-04-25 18:01:20 EDT --- Update http://thenerdshow.com/rpm/tinycc-git20100114-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225834] Merge Review: gnome-python2 (stalled)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225834 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|NEW CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-25 18:09:20 EDT --- - The devel package only contains text files - can be noarch - Don't use %define inside a macro (first line). It would be better, if you'd use the macro from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Macros - Please use parallel make: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make - When building I get: * *** WARNING: You are using a deprecated build system (autotools). *** You should be using WAF instead; see the file INSTALL.WAF. *** The autotools build system will be removed in a future version. * - Please preserve timestamps: make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' - I don't see atm what the '%defattr(644,root,root,755)' in some %files sections do... Can this be left out? - Could you please be consistend with python2-devel vs python-devel? e.g. BR python2-devel, but the devel subpackage R python-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 585754] New: Review Request: libdbusmenu-qt - A Qt implementation of the DBusMenu protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libdbusmenu-qt - A Qt implementation of the DBusMenu protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585754 Summary: Review Request: libdbusmenu-qt - A Qt implementation of the DBusMenu protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libdbusmenu-qt/libdbusmenu-qt.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libdbusmenu-qt/libdbusmenu-qt-0.3.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This library provides a Qt implementation of the DBusMenu protocol. The DBusMenu protocol makes it possible for applications to export and import their menus over DBus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 585754] Review Request: libdbusmenu-qt - A Qt implementation of the DBusMenu protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585754 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2010-04-25 18:53:26 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2137061 $ rpmlint *src.rpm x86_64/*.rpm libdbusmenu-qt-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 585754] Review Request: dbusmenu-qt - A Qt implementation of the DBusMenu protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585754 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: dbusmenu-qt |libdbusmenu-qt - A Qt |- A Qt implementation of |implementation of the |the DBusMenu protocol |DBusMenu protocol | Alias||dbusmenu-qt --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2010-04-25 19:11:05 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/dbusmenu-qt/dbusmenu-qt.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libdbusmenu-qt/dbusmenu-qt-0.3.2-2.fc13.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Apr 25 2010 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 0.3.2-2 - pkg rename s/libdbusmenu-qt/dbusmenu-qt/ - Provides: libdbusmenu-qt(-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 266001] Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266001 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #13 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-25 20:24:09 EDT --- To be honest: Is it worth to get a package into fedora, which is not actively maintained? (Tarball 8 years old, last commit in svn 4 years old) Or do you want to become the new maintainer and further improve/develop this? It looks like this could work on python3 (just looked at the source, untested), maybe you could do a subpackage as described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583531] Review Request: firetray - A system tray addon for mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583531 --- Comment #2 from Hicham HAOUARI hicham.haou...@gmail.com 2010-04-25 20:38:33 EDT --- OK, valid suggestion, I will take it into account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583531] Review Request: mozilla-firetray - A system tray addon for mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583531 Hicham HAOUARI hicham.haou...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: firetray - |Review Request: |A system tray addon for |mozilla-firetray - A system |mozilla |tray addon for mozilla -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 580830] Review Request: Clish - Command Line Interface Shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580830 --- Comment #8 from Devil Wang wxjea...@gmail.com 2010-04-25 21:57:45 EDT --- Cause the lasted SPEC did not modify any source code or patches , We can assume the lasted SPEC as the origin SPEC. So , there is no use to update the changelog for further. One more question , if my package could be pushed in to the yum list or some other source list for further checking now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563844] Review Request: zim - A Desktop Wiki Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #36 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com 2010-04-25 23:07:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: zim Short Description: A desktop wiki editor Owners: cheeselee Branches: F-13 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554760] Review Request: x-tile - A GNOME panel applet to tile windows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554760 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-04-25 23:34:55 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572233] Review Request: compat-tracker - Compatibilty libraries and tools for tracker-0.6.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572233 --- Comment #31 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-04-25 23:38:47 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574506] Review Request: python26-distribute - the Distribute fork of setuptools for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574506 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-04-25 23:39:17 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581723] Review Request: extundelete - An ext3 and ext4 file system undeletion utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581723 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-04-25 23:42:25 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563844] Review Request: zim - A Desktop Wiki Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@tummy.com --- Comment #37 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-04-25 23:46:50 EDT --- What is the hurry here? Is there a critical release blocker I am un-aware of related to if zim is updated? Obsoleting the existing package against it's maintainers wishes seems very poor to me. Some questions: 1. Is the 'new upstream' aware that the old zim is going to continue to be maintained? 2. Chris: Would you be willing to rename to 'zim-classic' or something? 3. Would the new zim upstream consider renaming to something else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581216] Review Request: texworks - A simple IDE for authoring TeX documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581216 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-04-25 23:52:00 EDT --- mrlhwlibe...@gmail.com: I am unable to find your address in the packagers group. You must be in this group to approve package reviews. What is your Fedora account system name? Also, if you are new to reviewing packages, I strongly advise you to use a checklist showing that you checked all the various guidelines and confirm that the package meets them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540127] Review Request: qterm - BBS client designed for BBS browsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540127 --- Comment #30 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-04-25 23:52:06 EDT --- mrlhwlibe...@gmail.com: I am unable to find your address in the packagers group. You must be in this group to approve package reviews. What is your Fedora account system name? Also, if you are new to reviewing packages, I strongly advise you to use a checklist showing that you checked all the various guidelines and confirm that the package meets them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 585336] Review Request: perl-Sys-CPU - Getting CPU information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585336 --- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2010-04-26 00:07:11 EDT --- I have actually enquired the same to upstream, and awaiting a response. Will update as soon as I get a reply from upstream. Thanks for your reply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563844] Review Request: zim - A Desktop Wiki Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 --- Comment #38 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-04-26 00:08:03 EDT --- Kevin: Please notice that we asked Chris what he wanted to do at least on 2010-03-13 and while he said he wanted to continue maintaining perl based Zim package he did not take actions for it for more than 1 month - this already exceeds periods for non-maintained package policy. Or do you force us to wait another one month to get this package imported? I don't find any issue why the upstream should rename python based zim to something else. Upstream now wants to write zim with python not perl, and nothing else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540127] Review Request: qterm - BBS client designed for BBS browsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540127 --- Comment #31 from Chen Lei supercy...@163.com 2010-04-26 00:23:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) mrlhwlibe...@gmail.com: I am unable to find your address in the packagers group. You must be in this group to approve package reviews. What is your Fedora account system name? His FAS name is helloworld1, as I known only people who was already in packager group in fas can set Flags in bugzilla. Also, if you are new to reviewing packages, I strongly advise you to use a checklist showing that you checked all the various guidelines and confirm that the package meets them. He is new to packager group and I'll tell him to use a review template to perform a review next time. This small package is rather easy and seems already checked by him in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405#c33. I hope this package could be imported. Add patch for building against qt-4.7 SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/qterm-0.5.10-1.fc12.src.rpm SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/qterm.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523601] Review Request: swish-e - Simple Web Indexing System for Humans - Enhanced
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523601 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|panem...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-04-26 00:29:14 EDT --- I have no interest now to review this. Therefore returning this back to NEW queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578759] Review request: django-mako - Mako Templates Plugin for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578759 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-04-26 00:30:34 EDT --- Ping? If not responded next 15 days will move this ticket to NEW queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 582163] Review Request: perl-Test-Smoke - Perl core test smoke suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582163 Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shakthim...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|shakthim...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540127] Review Request: qterm - BBS client designed for BBS browsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540127 --- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-04-26 00:31:39 EDT --- His FAS name is helloworld1, as I known only people who was already in packager group in fas can set Flags in bugzilla. Thank you. I don't know why my search wasn't finding by email address. ;( Users in fedorabugs or any of various Red Hat groups can also set the flag... I will process this request in a few minutes. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540127] Review Request: qterm - BBS client designed for BBS browsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540127 --- Comment #33 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-04-26 00:32:51 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581216] Review Request: texworks - A simple IDE for authoring TeX documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581216 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-04-26 00:33:17 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581216] Review Request: texworks - A simple IDE for authoring TeX documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581216 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-26 01:01:02 EDT --- texworks-0.2.3-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/texworks-0.2.3-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572233] Review Request: compat-tracker - Compatibilty libraries and tools for tracker-0.6.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572233 Deji Akingunola dakin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #32 from Deji Akingunola dakin...@gmail.com 2010-04-26 01:06:17 EDT --- Built for rawhide and F-13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 585467] Review Request: mozilla-googlesharing - Anonymizing proxy service for google sharing system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585467
--- Comment #4 from Mohammed Imran imran...@gmail.com 2010-04-26 01:35:33 EDT
---
Spec URL :
http://github.com/downloads/matriux/fedora/mozilla-googlesharing.spec
SRPM URL :
http://github.com/downloads/matriux/fedora/mozilla-googlesharing-0.18-3.fc11.src.rpm
-Used pushd and popd
-Fixed typo google
-Removed %define debug_package %{nil} from spec file
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 585073] Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla - Distribution builder; installer not included!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585073 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-04-26 01:48:53 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2133267 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 37d24daed711994efc64676be01344208f8345a9 Dist-Zilla-2.101040.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=21, Tests=187, 15 wallclock secs ( 0.09 usr 0.04 sys + 13.99 cusr 1.33 csys = 15.45 CPU) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
