[Bug 559552] Review Request: qca-pkcs11 - Smartcard integration for QCA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559552 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercyp...@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Chen Lei 2010-05-25 02:18:54 EDT --- All qca plugin seems merged to qca in svn. See http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdesupport/qca/plugins/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594744] Review Request: zint - A barcode generator and library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594744 --- Comment #6 from Martin Gieseking 2010-05-25 01:49:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Adding BR to subpackages make no sense. To me, it does make sense to indicate where the BRs are actually needed. As the rpm specification allows it, the question is if the Fedora guidelines want them kept together in the base package. However, it's not that important to me. I'll move them to the base package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581278] Review Request: erlang-etap - Erlang testing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581278 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2010-05-25 01:13:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request == Package Name: erlang-etap Short Description: Erlang testing library Owners: peter Branches: F-11 F-12 F-13 EL-6 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578759] Review request: django-mako - Mako Templates Plugin for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578759 Rahul Sundaram changed: What|Removed |Added CC||methe...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|methe...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591222] Review Request: gtk3 - version 3 of GTK+
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591222
--- Comment #15 from Chen Lei 2010-05-25 00:32:03 EDT
---
Some many suggestion:
Most IM packages(scim, ibus) add %config to its conf file.
%{_sysconfdir}/X11/xinit/xinput.d/im-cedilla.conf
->%config %{_sysconfdir}/X11/xinit/xinput.d/im-cedilla.conf
I suggest to add a gnome-filessystem to fedora, like kde-filesystem,
mozilla-filesystem to own some common directories in gnome. So that, gnome
packages can only depends on this filesystem package instead of owning the
directories.
e.g.
%{_datadir}/gtk-doc
%{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html
%{_datadir}/gir-1.0
%{_datadir}/gnome/help
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591222] Review Request: gtk3 - version 3 of GTK+
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591222 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercyp...@gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Chen Lei 2010-05-25 00:17:04 EDT --- I'll be much better to not require gtk-doc in gtk3-devel-docs Simply own /usr/share/gtk-doc/html in %file will be more appropiate, actually html documentations in /usr/share/gtk-doc/html is used by devhelp or webbrower not by gtk-doc. gtk-doc is a tool to generate those html files. Requires: automake is also not necessrary, it'll pull in some additional dependency which is useless for most SRPMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567678] Review Request: Cameramonitor - Notification icon when webcam is active
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567678 Andrew Dingman changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(ading...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #15 from Andrew Dingman 2010-05-24 23:25:02 EDT --- My daughter is 3 days old. I truly do appreciate your feedback and attention, but try again in a month? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590522] Review Request: plexus-cipher-1.4-1 - Plexus Cipher: encryption/decryption Component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590522 --- Comment #19 from huwang 2010-05-24 22:43:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Ok the commons-logging thing has been fixed, but it still fails to build for > me: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2201405 > > > [INFO] > > [ERROR] BUILD ERROR > [INFO] > > [INFO] Internal error in the plugin manager executing goal > 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.4:javadoc': Unable to find > the > mojo 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.4:javadoc' in the plugin > 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin' > org.apache.maven.doxia.logging.LogEnabled > [INFO] > > > > I'm not sure what "Unable to find the mojo" means, is it a problem with this > package or a problem in the maven javadoc plugin? I think this isn't this package's problem. I built again, it isn't failed, the link is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2207394 spec URL: http://code.google.com/p/tobepackagemaintaner/downloads/detail?name=plexus-cipher.spec&can=2&q=#makechanges SRPM URL: http://code.google.com/p/tobepackagemaintaner/downloads/detail?name=plexus-cipher-1.5-1.src.rpm&can=2&q=#makechanges please review again, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595268] Review Request: tangerine-fonts - Tangerine is a calligraphy font inspired by many italic chancery hands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595268 Daiki Ueno changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||du...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|du...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Daiki Ueno 2010-05-24 22:06:30 EDT --- I'm trying to review. The packaging looks mostly ok with me, except that: 1. packaging request Please create a font description wiki page for this font: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#1 2. the fontconfig.conf prefix is 65 Since this font seems to contain only LGC glyphs (and some symbols), I think it should be 61-64: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Choosing_a_ruleset_numeral_prefix 3. locale-specific override without "lang" test IIUC, it works as if an inverted "Simple priority list" rule applies: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Locale-specific_overrides I guess 2 & 3 are complementary each other, is that intended? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594744] Review Request: zint - A barcode generator and library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594744 --- Comment #5 from Chen Lei 2010-05-24 21:51:20 EDT --- > > 3. I'll be better to include .desktop as Source1 in spec > I prefer keeping the desktop file in the spec. :) It's kind of personal > preference, I think. I'll ask upstream to add it to the tarball, though. Historically, fedora packaging guideline only accepts including desktop file as a source file. But, recently incluing desktop file in spec is also accepted. > > 7. > > BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 4.4 > > BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils > > > > BR should not be added to subpackages. > Is there a hint about this in the guidelines? Technically, there's no > difference whether the BRs are placed in the base package or a subpackage. Adding BR to subpackages make no sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594943] Review Request: libnoise - A general-purpose library that generates three-dimensional coherent noise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #11 from Robin Norwood 2010-05-24 21:02:51 EDT --- I've emailed MathMap's developer and am awaiting a response. I'll update this bug when I hear back from him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595551] Review Request: ibus-table-mathwriter - ibus-table-mathwriter provides input method for writing Unicode Math symbols
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595551 Naveen Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-package-rev...@redha ||t.com, ||i18n-b...@lists.fedoraproje ||ct.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578480] Review Request: spectrum - XMPP transport/gateway
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480 --- Comment #11 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-24 18:46:40 EDT --- Don't we need a special user "spectrum"? Any group? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578480] Review Request: spectrum - XMPP transport/gateway
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480 --- Comment #12 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-24 18:48:55 EDT --- Should also emphasize somewhere (%description? README.Fedora?) that users of RHEL-5 needs to have enabled RHEL Optional Productivity Apps channel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578480] Review Request: spectrum - XMPP transport/gateway
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480 --- Comment #10 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-24 18:28:23 EDT --- Revised RHEL-5 build (no, I haven't bumped Release, sorry) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2207035 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578480] Review Request: spectrum - XMPP transport/gateway
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480 --- Comment #9 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-24 18:27:17 EDT --- I guess it casues installation of at least: X cairo i386 1.2.4-5.el5 rhel-i386-server-5 394 k X cups-libs i386 1:1.3.7-18.el5 rhel-i386-server-5 197 k X cvs i386 1.11.22-7.el5rhel-i386-server-5 725 k X gettext-devel i386 0.14.6-4.el5 rhel-i386-server-5 1.0 M X gtk2i386 2.10.4-20.el5rhel-i386-server-5 6.5 M X libgcj i386 4.1.2-48.el5 rhel-i386-server-5 16 M X pango i386 1.14.9-8.el5 rhel-i386-server-5 335 k 25MB of packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578480] Review Request: spectrum - XMPP transport/gateway
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480 --- Comment #8 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-24 17:48:49 EDT --- One more problem (but that's probably for upstream): [r...@luther ~]# rpm -qRp /home/matej/spectrum-0.2-2.el5.i386.rpm |grep gettext libgettextpo.so.0 [ma...@tikanga build]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/libgettextpo.so.0 gettext-devel-0.14.6-4.el5 [ma...@tikanga build]$ Why do I need gettext-devel (with all its numerous dependencies) for spectrum? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 587438] Review Request: rubygem-snmp - A Ruby implementation of SNMP (the Simple Network Management Protocol)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587438 --- Comment #9 from Michael Stahnke 2010-05-24 17:49:16 EDT --- I've contacted upstream about the test failures and fixed the macros usage. They will be fixed upon import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 587438] Review Request: rubygem-snmp - A Ruby implementation of SNMP (the Simple Network Management Protocol)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587438 Michael Stahnke changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Michael Stahnke 2010-05-24 17:48:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rubygem-snmp Short Description: SNMP bindings for Ruby Owners: stahnma Branches: F-12 F-13 EL-5 EL-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561456] Review Request: jnr-x86asm - Pure-java port of asmjit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561456
--- Comment #4 from Mohammed Morsi 2010-05-24 17:41:05 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> NOTOK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
> the
> review.
> NOTOK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
> NOTOK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
> as
> provided in the spec URL.
>
> Output:
> jnr-x86asm.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) asmjit -> Asmara, Asquith,
> fajitas
> jnr-x86asm.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US asmjit -> Asmara,
> Asquith, fajitas
> jnr-x86asm.src: W: invalid-url Source0: jnr-x86asm-0.1.tgz
> jnr-x86asm.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) asmjit -> Asmara, Asquith,
> fajitas
> jnr-x86asm.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US asmjit -> Asmara,
> Asquith, fajitas
> jnr-x86asm-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) asm -> as, am, mas
> jnr-x86asm-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US asm -> as,
> am, mas
> 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.
I'm ignoring all the spelling errors as it's complaining about 'asmjit' which
is a legit part of the package summary / description. (Also I'm not seeing
those warnings locally, running rpmlint against the SRPM doesn't yield those
spelling errors)
>
> While spec file explains how to create Source0 it fails to provide
> reliable way to verify no changes happened between Source0 was taken
> and building of RPM. You need to specify git hash (part of it at
> least) of commit that should be checked out after cloning. Once some
> version is released by developer, it would be ideal if git tag hash was
> used instead.
>
FIXED. It seems the upstream author released a project tarball not long after I
uploaded this package, so now I'm just using that.
> This also applies to naming of package. This is most certainly a
> pre-relase so naming convetions are these:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#PreReleasePackages
>
This is not a pre-release. This is the 0.1 release. According to that wiki link
a prerelease would be something like 0.2alpha or what not.
>
> OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
> %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. .
> OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
> OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
> Licensing Guidelines .
> NOTOK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
> license.
>
> License of package is obviously LGPLv3 not MIT
FIXED.
>
> OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
> its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
> package must be included in %doc.
>
> License is included, but it would be good to include COPYING* files
> too especially since COPYING file has the text of license itself.
DONE
>
> OK: The spec file must be written in American English.
> OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
> OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
> least one primary architecture.
> OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
> that
> are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion
> of
> those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
> OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
> a
> directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create
> that
> directory.
> OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
> %files listings.
> OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
> executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
> %defattr(...) line.
> NOTOK: Each package must consistently use macros.
> you mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. Pick one and stick to it
>
FIXED
> OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
> OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of
> large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
> size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
> OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
> packages.
> The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own
> the
> files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for
> example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the
> files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that
> you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns,
> then please present that at package review time.
> OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be v
[Bug 581619] Review Request: mlterm - Multi Lingual TERMinal emulator on X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581619 --- Comment #8 from Muayyad Alsadi 2010-05-24 17:13:55 EDT --- up! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561451] Review Request: nailgun - Framework for running Java from the cli without the JVM startup overhead
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561451 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 16:18:46 EDT --- nailgun-0.7.1-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nailgun-0.7.1-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561451] Review Request: nailgun - Framework for running Java from the cli without the JVM startup overhead
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561451 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 16:09:41 EDT --- nailgun-0.7.1-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nailgun-0.7.1-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579376] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-PSGI - PSGI Adapter for CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579376 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:46:11 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-PSGI-1.00-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588122] Review Request: perl-Symbol-Util - Additional utilities for Perl symbols manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588122 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Symbol-Util-0.0202-3.f |perl-Symbol-Util-0.0202-3.f |c12 |c11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579376] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-PSGI - PSGI Adapter for CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579376 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CGI-Application-PSGI-1 |perl-CGI-Application-PSGI-1 |.00-1.fc12 |.00-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593879] Review Request: libvpx - VP8 Video Codec SDK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593879 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libvpx-0.9.0-5.fc11 |libvpx-0.9.0-5.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593879] Review Request: libvpx - VP8 Video Codec SDK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593879 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:45:37 EDT --- libvpx-0.9.0-5.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588122] Review Request: perl-Symbol-Util - Additional utilities for Perl symbols manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588122 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:49:13 EDT --- perl-Symbol-Util-0.0202-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libaesgm-20090429-2.fc13|libaesgm-20090429-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:47:09 EDT --- libaesgm-20090429-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579369] Review Request: kanjistrokeorders-fonts - Font to view stroke order diagrams for Kanji, Kana and etc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579369 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:44:17 EDT --- kanjistrokeorders-fonts-2.014-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579376] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-PSGI - PSGI Adapter for CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579376 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:40:48 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-PSGI-1.00-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594943] Review Request: libnoise - A general-purpose library that generates three-dimensional coherent noise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #10 from Robin Norwood 2010-05-24 15:43:48 EDT --- Ok, thanks. I'll work on contacting the upstream developers for MathMap and libnoise and see what we can work out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579376] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-PSGI - PSGI Adapter for CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579376 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:43:08 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-PSGI-1.00-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593879] Review Request: libvpx - VP8 Video Codec SDK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593879 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:44:06 EDT --- libvpx-0.9.0-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579376] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-PSGI - PSGI Adapter for CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579376 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CGI-Application-PSGI-1 |perl-CGI-Application-PSGI-1 |.00-1.fc13 |.00-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 528288] Review Request: python-blist - A faster list implementation for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528288 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:41:17 EDT --- python-blist-1.1.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-blist'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-blist-1.1.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579376] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-PSGI - PSGI Adapter for CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579376 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-CGI-PSGI-0.10-1.fc13 |perl-CGI-Application-PSGI-1 ||.00-1.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579369] Review Request: kanjistrokeorders-fonts - Font to view stroke order diagrams for Kanji, Kana and etc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579369 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|kanjistrokeorders-fonts-2.0 |kanjistrokeorders-fonts-2.0 |14-4.fc13 |14-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libaesgm-20090429-2.fc11|libaesgm-20090429-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:42:22 EDT --- libaesgm-20090429-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593879] Review Request: libvpx - VP8 Video Codec SDK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593879 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libvpx-0.9.0-5.fc13 |libvpx-0.9.0-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 528288] Review Request: python-blist - A faster list implementation for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528288 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:36:51 EDT --- python-blist-1.1.1-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-blist'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-blist-1.1.1-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 586777] Review Request: glyphtracer - Program for creating fonts from images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586777 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||glyphtracer-1.1-1.20100510b ||zr76.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579369] Review Request: kanjistrokeorders-fonts - Font to view stroke order diagrams for Kanji, Kana and etc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579369 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||kanjistrokeorders-fonts-2.0 ||14-4.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579369] Review Request: kanjistrokeorders-fonts - Font to view stroke order diagrams for Kanji, Kana and etc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579369 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:38:33 EDT --- kanjistrokeorders-fonts-2.014-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 586777] Review Request: glyphtracer - Program for creating fonts from images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586777 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|glyphtracer-1.1-1.20100510b |glyphtracer-1.1-1.20100510b |zr76.fc13 |zr76.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588122] Review Request: perl-Symbol-Util - Additional utilities for Perl symbols manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588122 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:36:56 EDT --- perl-Symbol-Util-0.0202-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537363] Review Request: lv2-c++-tools - Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537363 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:37:42 EDT --- lv2-c++-tools-1.0.3-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 586777] Review Request: glyphtracer - Program for creating fonts from images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586777 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:39:01 EDT --- glyphtracer-1.1-1.20100510bzr76.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 586777] Review Request: glyphtracer - Program for creating fonts from images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586777 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:35:52 EDT --- glyphtracer-1.1-1.20100510bzr76.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||libaesgm-20090429-2.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588122] Review Request: perl-Symbol-Util - Additional utilities for Perl symbols manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588122 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Symbol-Util-0.0202-3.f |perl-Symbol-Util-0.0202-3.f |c13 |c12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537363] Review Request: lv2-c++-tools - Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537363 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|lv2-c++-tools-1.0.3-3.fc13 |lv2-c++-tools-1.0.3-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537363] Review Request: lv2-c++-tools - Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537363 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|lv2-c++-tools-1.0.3-3.fc11 |lv2-c++-tools-1.0.3-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537363] Review Request: lv2-c++-tools - Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537363 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:36:32 EDT --- lv2-c++-tools-1.0.3-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588122] Review Request: perl-Symbol-Util - Additional utilities for Perl symbols manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588122 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Symbol-Util-0.0202-3.f ||c13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537363] Review Request: lv2-c++-tools - Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537363 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||lv2-c++-tools-1.0.3-3.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588122] Review Request: perl-Symbol-Util - Additional utilities for Perl symbols manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588122 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:32:34 EDT --- perl-Symbol-Util-0.0202-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537363] Review Request: lv2-c++-tools - Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537363 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:35:08 EDT --- lv2-c++-tools-1.0.3-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:35:31 EDT --- libaesgm-20090429-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593879] Review Request: libvpx - VP8 Video Codec SDK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593879 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||libvpx-0.9.0-5.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593879] Review Request: libvpx - VP8 Video Codec SDK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593879 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:32:09 EDT --- libvpx-0.9.0-5.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593125] Review Request: gridsite - Grid Security for the Web, Web platforms for Grids
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593125 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:16:02 EDT --- gridsite-1.5.18-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gridsite'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gridsite-1.5.18-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593125] Review Request: gridsite - Grid Security for the Web, Web platforms for Grids
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593125 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:17:21 EDT --- gridsite-1.5.18-4.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gridsite'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gridsite-1.5.18-4.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583251] Review Request: dcfldd - Improved dd, useful for forensics and security
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583251 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:16:51 EDT --- dcfldd-1.3.4.1-4.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583251] Review Request: dcfldd - Improved dd, useful for forensics and security
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583251 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|dcfldd-1.3.4.1-4.el5|dcfldd-1.3.4.1-4.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583251] Review Request: dcfldd - Improved dd, useful for forensics and security
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583251 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|dcfldd-1.3.4.1-4.fc13 |dcfldd-1.3.4.1-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583251] Review Request: dcfldd - Improved dd, useful for forensics and security
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583251 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 15:16:15 EDT --- dcfldd-1.3.4.1-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 584111] Review Request: cmatrix - Simulate the display from "The Matrix"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584111 --- Comment #13 from Ayush Mah'ri 2010-05-24 15:13:09 EDT --- SPEC URL : http://hakmn.fedorapeople.org/cmatrix.spec SRPM URL : http://hakmn.fedorapeople.org/cmatrix-1.2a-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592579] Review Request: Frama-c - Framework for source code analysis of C software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592579
--- Comment #16 from David A. Wheeler 2010-05-24
14:39:51 EDT ---
Here are the guidelines from:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines
It's hard for me to check on some of these until it can once again build binary
packages on all expected architectures, but I thought it'd be helpful to do as
much as I can now. In that spirit, here are my comments:
* MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted
in the review.[1]
IN PROGRESS. rpmlint output shown earlier, and issues being worked on.
* MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines .
OK
* MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
OK
* MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK generally, but see other comments (including this one).
* MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
meet the Licensing Guidelines .
IN PROGRESS. I suspect the license is fine, but it *must* be specifically
approved.
* MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license. [3]
Spec claims:
License:LGPLv2 and GPL+ and GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and BSD and (QPL with
modifications)
See the previous threads about the licensing of this.
I did some additional checking.
In particular: I didn't see any examples of "GPL+", only GPLv2 and GPLv2+. If
there are no source programs with GPL+, then "GPL+" should be removed from the
license list. Did I miss it somehow? If so, what file is "GPL+"?
Here's what I found when I looked:
Under the "src" directory I spot-checked the ".ml" and ".c" files, and they
were
all LGPL v2.1. Same for "share" and "ptests".
The "cil" subdirectory has "LICENSE", which is (3-clause) BSD, and that matches
the .ml files under there.
external/ptmap.ml has the "Q modified license", so it *IS* used.
./tests/spec/purse.c: GPLv2 (*NOT* GPLv2+, but strictly GPLv2)
./tests/idct/idct.c: GPLv2+
./tests/idct/ieee_1180_1990.c: GPLv2+
The "licenses" directory contains this:
GPLv3 LGPLv2.1 LGPLv3 Q_MODIFIED_LICENSE
The Q_MODIFIED_LICENSE includes the "Q modified license" and
a reference to "LGPLv2".
This *DIRECTORY* includes GPLv3, but I did not find ANY source file
that actually referred to GPLv3. A few referred to GPLv2+,
but the license text should say "GPLv2+" and not "GPLv3".
So, even though there's a "GPLv3" in the "licenses" directory,
you should not add "GPLv3" to the Licenses entry.
* MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4]
FAIL. Under %files, need to add entries for the license files that are there.
* MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
OK
* MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
OK
* MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
OK - hashes match.
wget http://frama-c.com/download/frama-c-Beryllium-20090902.tar.gz
sha512sum frama-c-Beryllium-20090902.tar.gz
~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/frama-c-Beryllium-20090902.tar.gz
1f78aaaf99f62a5746a4e673a722d9384156d29027d3ca079c4f0d0de9afa4c4aacd6b65721375f094698453ed339b9de9f91a2ca2d41d4c5784390b0eccb0e3
frama-c-Beryllium-20090902.tar.gz
1f78aaaf99f62a5746a4e673a722d9384156d29027d3ca079c4f0d0de9afa4c4aacd6b65721375f094698453ed339b9de9f91a2ca2d41d4c5784390b0eccb0e3
/home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/SOURCES/frama-c-Beryllium-20090902.tar.gz
* MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture. [7]
IN PROGRESS.
* MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8]
FAIL - need to add those.
* MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
Nothing obviously wrong, but need to check with Mock.
* MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using
the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9]
NA; no locale info.
* MUST
[Bug 594943] Review Request: libnoise - A general-purpose library that generates three-dimensional coherent noise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #9 from Martin Gieseking 2010-05-24 14:36:54 EDT --- I agree, 1) is not an option here. The best variant would be a corporative upstream developer. If he can't be convinced to add the patch, the cleanest way would probably be a fork of the library. This leads to additional work, though. I think, Fedora shouldn't provide a shared library with an updated interface that differs from upstream. However, I'm not sure about this. Maybe you can ask on the devel or packaging list for further suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592579] Review Request: Frama-c - Framework for source code analysis of C software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592579 --- Comment #15 from Mark Rader 2010-05-24 14:36:38 EDT --- I should have this one fixed soon, I will probably get it fixed tonight. I will also be able to address some of the ones listed in the previous error report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594844] Review Request: iec16022 - Generate ISO/IEC 16022 2D barcodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594844
Ville Skyttä changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ville.sky...@iki.fi
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Ville Skyttä 2010-05-24 14:37:10 EDT
---
1) If no previous version of -libs is installed (for example in a clean mock
build), the test suite throws errors but doesn't fail the build:
make: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/iec16022-0.2.4/test'
make check-TESTS
make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/iec16022-0.2.4/test'
/builddir/build/BUILD/iec16022-0.2.4/.libs/lt-iec16022: error while loading
shared libraries: libiec16022.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory
[...]
diff: testsuite-test.text: No such file or directory
Text test FAILED
diff: testsuite-test.eps: No such file or directory
EPS test FAILED
diff: testsuite-test.png: No such file or directory
PNG test FAILED
diff: testsuite-test.bin: No such file or directory
Bin test FAILED
diff: testsuite-test.hex: No such file or directory
Hex test FAILED
rm: cannot remove `testsuite-test.*': No such file or directory
PASS: ./testsuite.sh
=
1 test passed
=
Some LD_LIBRARY_PATH settings should be added to make the test suite do the
right thing (use the just built libraries, this should be reported upstream),
for example this at start of %check:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}
And patching of upstream build process/test scripts is needed; if tests fail,
the test suite and build should fail too.
2) (Cosmetic) --disable-dependency-tracking is the default nowadays, it can be
dropped from %configure arguments.
3) Would not hurt to make the dependency on -libs in -devel arch qualified,
ditto perhaps add one from main package to -libs:
Requires: %{name}-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ArchSpecificRequires
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 587438] Review Request: rubygem-snmp - A Ruby implementation of SNMP (the Simple Network Management Protocol)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587438
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-05-24
14:23:14 EDT ---
Well, I think that if the provided tests fail, at least
- the cause should be examined (especially the cause is because
the failed test is badly written or the main program itself
is broken)
- the fact should be noticed to the upstream that the provided test
fails
And if patch is available, submitting the patch to the upstream will
be appreciated (by the upstream).
By the way one other thing.
* Consistent macros usage
- If you want to use %{__sed} style, please use this style everywhere
if this is available for consistency (like %{__mkdir}, %{__rm},
%{__mv}).
-
This package (rubygem-snmp) is APPROVED by mtasaka
-
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478613] Review Request: ledger - A powerful command-line double-entry accounting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478613 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(radf...@blackbean ||.org) --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2010-05-24 14:21:56 EDT --- Until RPM supports soft dependencies of the recommends/suggests sort, there is no good way of fixing the issue. I'm personally happy with the current guidelines -- though unhappy with the lack of soft dependency -- but given that your current package violates two compulsory points: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Things_To_Check_On_Review MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages I'd find it hard to go ahead with this review. I suggest contacting the fedora-packaging list for a clarification, or I can step back and you can try convincing another maintainer that dangling links are the best way out of this. (when RPM gets the ability to recommends packages, of course, you would be able to just make the main ledger app recommends emacs-ledger, and keep Vim users happy) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594744] Review Request: zint - A barcode generator and library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594744 --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking 2010-05-24 14:24:12 EDT --- Thanks for the comments, Chen Lei. I'll update the package in about a week when version 2.3.2 is out. It incorporates the locale patch and fixes the shared-lib-calls-exit issue. (In reply to comment #3) > 1.I suggest you to split shlibs into subpackages, e.g. zint-libs zint-qt-libs. > Fedora ships multilibs in x86_64 and ppc64. Yes, that's a good idea. However, it leads to 6 pretty small packages. If this is not a problem, I'll go with it. > 3. I'll be better to include .desktop as Source1 in spec I prefer keeping the desktop file in the spec. :) It's kind of personal preference, I think. I'll ask upstream to add it to the tarball, though. > 7. > BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 4.4 > BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils > > BR should not be added to subpackages. Is there a hint about this in the guidelines? Technically, there's no difference whether the BRs are placed in the base package or a subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595011] Review Request: sshdfilter - Filter for SSH ports
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595011 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: sshdfilter || -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572989] Review Request: sugar-paint - Paint activity for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572989 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Sebastian Dziallas 2010-05-24 14:09:50 EDT --- Built in Rawhide and others, update being on its way soon. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555990] Review Request: rubygems-acts-as-list - Sorting and reordering capabilities for ActiveRecord model
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555990 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-05-24 13:53:38 EDT --- Well, * Please remove backup .requirear file from %buildroot (this file is also copyed into %buildroot by "cp -a" as it is). Please fix the above issue when importing this package into Fedora CVS. -- This package (rubygem-acts-as-tree) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592579] Review Request: Frama-c - Framework for source code analysis of C software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592579 --- Comment #14 from David A. Wheeler 2010-05-24 13:50:49 EDT --- The updated rpm fails on 32-bit systems. You have a built-in assumption that there is a "lib64", but on 32-bit system it's just "lib". Here's the error: cp -f man/frama-c.1 /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/frama-c-1.4-1.fc11.i386/usr/share/man/man1/frama-c-gui.1 for plugin in ; do \ MAKEFLAGS="" make FRAMAC_LIBDIR=/home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/frama-c-1.4-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/frama-c FRAMAC_SHARE=/home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/frama-c-Beryllium-20090902/share -C $plugin install; \ done + strip /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/frama-c-1.4-1.fc11.i386/usr/bin/frama-c + strip /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/frama-c-1.4-1.fc11.i386/usr/bin/frama-c-gui + strip /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/frama-c-1.4-1.fc11.i386/usr/bin/frama-c.byte + strip /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/frama-c-1.4-1.fc11.i386/usr/bin/frama-c-gui.byte + strip /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/frama-c-1.4-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib64/frama-c/plugins/Ltl_to_acsl.cmxs strip: '/home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/frama-c-1.4-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib64/frama-c/plugins/Ltl_to_acsl.cmxs': No such file error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.TXN0rD (%install) Can you fix this soon? Although I haven't looked in detail at the packaging of "why", I suspect it'd be fairly easy to create a new subpackage "why-jessie"; the new subpackage would include Jessie and the Jessie plug-in, and depend on frama-c. I think that would accurately reflect the situation. Jessie is delivered as part of the source code of "why", you can use other parts of "why" without using Jessie, but Jessie requires the use of frama-c (to create its data format and the drop-in location for its plug-in). That shouldn't be hard to do once the "frama-c" package is in the repository. Go ahead and package the Frama-C version you're using. I hope that in the not-to-distant future you'll update this package to the just-released new version, but I understand that it's easier to not change versions midstream. And I don't know who's had experience with the newly-released version; it might be best to wait a little bit, until any problems have been shaken out, before updating the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478613] Review Request: ledger - A powerful command-line double-entry accounting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478613 --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2010-05-24 12:35:48 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, I'll try and post an updated response later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592579] Review Request: Frama-c - Framework for source code analysis of C software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592579
--- Comment #13 from David A. Wheeler 2010-05-24
12:08:08 EDT ---
I'm looking over the .spec file for overall comments, before I delve into a
point-by-point comparison with the guidelines.
* Every time you make a change you should bump the "Revision" number,
and post the new URL. That'll be *critical* when it's submitted to the
repository, but it'd reduce confusion now too.
* Patch0 comment says:
"The configure file uses graph.cmo in compiling a test program to
check for ocamlgraph, but Fedora doesn't include this file in its
distributions."
I'm confused, there *is* an ocaml-ocamlgraph package.
Is the Fedora respository's ocamlgraph the wrong (too old) version?
Or, is this just an old comment based on an older version of this spec,
now OBE?
* Patch1 isn't prefixed with "frama-c-", and that can cause trouble.
In general, if someone looks in their rpmbuild/SOURCES, they can get
confused (and namespace issues could result) if they aren't prefixed.
You should prefix the patch filenames with NAME- (e.g., "frama-c-").
* Rejected Debian Patch2 (0002-Make-Jessie-plugin-use-Jc-from-Why-2.19.patch)
comment says, "I don't know why we would want to use that
Jessie -> not including this patch". You're not including that patch
because we want to use a later version of Why, correct? If so, just say:
"We use a later version of Why, so this patch is irrelevant".
Although I applaud "I don't know..." comments for their honesty, I think
we should track them down so you can simply say why something was done.
In this case, there's a good reason: The patch is for an obsolete
version of "why".
* Rejected Debian patch "0003-Add-dGraphView.cmo-when-linking.patch"
says "I'm not sure quite what this patch does, but I'm going to
leave it out for now". Need to track this down a little of what this is.
My *guess* from the text is that it merges graphview into another
another library, and we *don't* want to do that (because then upgrading
graphview won't updated the merged file). If that's the
situation, please say so directly.
* Rejected Debian patch 0004-Use-GSourceView2.patch comment says
"I didn't see any Fedora package providing the files that this patch
references -> dropping for now".
Did you check out "gtksourceview2-devel" and "gtksourceview2"?
It's possible that the patch includes the *OCaml* bindings for these
and that Fedora doesn't include those bindings. If so, just say that.
* In Patch "frama-c-1.4-ptests-fix-for-ocaml-3.11.2.patch" there
needs to be a comment explaining (1) what it's for, and (2)
when you submitted it upstream (and if not, why not). Shouldn't be *long*,
but it should say *something*.
* Nit: Your "Requires:" statements have inconsistent indenting.
Please fix while you're at it.
* Nit: "plug in's" is not a word. An "'s" is either a possessive or
an appreviation of "is", and this is neither (it's just a plural).
I'd suggest "plug-ins" instead. If the spellchecker whines, too bad.
* I notice that the entire "%check" section is commented out.
A %check section is NOT required, and I'd prefer the comments to nothing,
but it'd be nice if it worked :-).
* As noted earlier, the .byte files don't work, and probably shouldn't
be packaged at all.
* I'll check the %files list separately.
* In %post, just remove the comment:
#chcon -t textrel_shlib_t '%{_libdir}/frama-c/plugins/Ltl_to_acsl.cmxs'
I don't see that the commend adds anything.
* The %changelog doesn't list "Mark Rader"; it should!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594744] Review Request: zint - A barcode generator and library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594744 --- Comment #3 from Chen Lei 2010-05-24 13:09:02 EDT --- 1.I suggest you to split shlibs into subpackages, e.g. zint-libs zint-qt-libs. Fedora ships multilibs in x86_64 and ppc64. 2.%package -n zint-devel -> %package devel 3. I'll be better to include .desktop as Source1 in spec 4.%cmake CMakeLists.txt -> %cmake . 5.Group: Applications/Engineering is not appropriate 6.For Source field, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net 7. BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 4.4 BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils BR should not be added to subpackages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594943] Review Request: libnoise - A general-purpose library that generates three-dimensional coherent noise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #8 from Robin Norwood 2010-05-24 13:06:35 EDT --- To be clear, the options I see are: 1) Just let MathMap build and link statically to their patched libnoise - the packaging guidelines strongly discourage this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries 2) Package libtool separately with the patch, the route I chose here. Nasty because it does change the API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594943] Review Request: libnoise - A general-purpose library that generates three-dimensional coherent noise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #7 from Robin Norwood 2010-05-24 12:56:29 EDT --- Hi Martin, The reason I'm packaging libnoise in the first place is that the new version of MathMap (1.3.5) requires it. The upstream version of MathMap ships with a tarball of libnoise, patches it, builds it, and links against it statically. The QUALITY_BESTCASE patch is from MathMap. I can check to see if MathMap has submitted the patch upstream or not...otherwise, I'm not really sure how to proceed if libnoise upstream is not interested in the patch...none of the options seem very appealing. Any suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594943] Review Request: libnoise - A general-purpose library that generates three-dimensional coherent noise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #6 from Martin Gieseking 2010-05-24 12:49:37 EDT --- Hi Robin, is there a special reason why you patch in an additional noise quality variant (QUALITY_BESTCASE)? This extends the interface and would require a bump of the library's release number. BTW, the version number should consist of 3 integers (libnoise.so.0.3.0 instead of libnoise.so.0.3 -- the latter can be added as a symlink, though). If possible, please ask upstream to fix this. Maybe he can also incorporate your patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593069] Review Request: ** experimental ** pynie - Implementation of Python 3 on top of the Parrot virtual machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593069 Dave Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DEFERRED --- Comment #9 from Dave Malcolm 2010-05-24 12:17:04 EDT --- Tim: thanks for reviewing this. Gerd: thanks for your input. Based on private email and comment #8, it appears that upstream would prefer it if we held off from shipping this within Fedora until Pynie does an official release. So we're going to hold off on this for now. I'm going to close this review with the resolution "DEFERRED" until there's an official upstream release of Pynie. At that point we can reopen this review. It may be that we need to update the specfile somewhat based on upstream changes to the code, so the packaging may need doublechecking at that point. Hope this sounds sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594844] Review Request: iec16022 - Generate ISO/IEC 16022 2D barcodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594844 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-05-24 12:10:30 EDT --- I continue to be unaware of any valid patents which would prevent this package from being included in Fedora. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 587438] Review Request: rubygem-snmp - A Ruby implementation of SNMP (the Simple Network Management Protocol)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587438 --- Comment #6 from Michael Stahnke 2010-05-24 11:57:30 EDT --- I have fixed the comments unrelated to the test. I am trying decide if patching simply for tests is a good idea. In general, I'd rather not carry patches against upstream if I can help it. I can contact upstream about the tests and see if they can either fix them or explain to me the proper method for running them. Very thorough and good review thus far. I do appreciate it. http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-snmp-1.0.2-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594844] Review Request: iec16022 - Generate ISO/IEC 16022 2D barcodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594844 Ville Skyttä changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com, ||ville.sky...@iki.fi Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Ville Skyttä 2010-05-24 11:47:22 EDT --- spot, do your comments about another Data Matrix related package in bug 561286 also apply to this one? Adding blocker on FE-legal until you've had a chance to take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594943] Review Request: libnoise - A general-purpose library that generates three-dimensional coherent noise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #5 from Robin Norwood 2010-05-24 11:25:44 EDT --- Hi Martin, I've implemented all of those suggestions: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2205980 http://www.norwoodfamily.info/rpms/libnoise.spec http://www.norwoodfamily.info/rpms/libnoise-1.0.0-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 586433] Review Request: Xnoise, a media player for gtk+ written in vala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586433 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercyp...@gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Chen Lei 2010-05-24 11:07:27 EDT --- Some more suggestions: The tarball bundles two seperate projects - xnoise and xnoise-plugins-core. It may not be appropriate. It's seems 0.1.2 is still a prerelease, you should modify you release field to match naming guideline. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages I highly suggest you to preprocess vala code to pure C in spec and not ship preprocessed code in you source tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593069] Review Request: ** experimental ** pynie - Implementation of Python 3 on top of the Parrot virtual machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593069 Gerd Pokorra changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: pynie - |Review Request: ** |Implementation of Python 3 |experimental ** pynie - |on top of the Parrot|Implementation of Python 3 |virtual machine |on top of the Parrot ||virtual machine --- Comment #8 from Gerd Pokorra 2010-05-24 10:22:53 EDT --- An official release of Pynie will appear in a few months. It is better to wait for it to not having needless trouble with broken dependences. It is explained in comment 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595011] Review Request:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595011 --- Comment #8 from Rahul Sundaram 2010-05-24 09:35:48 EDT --- Either you got to modify whatever is needed to the best extend possible in the package itself or document it in something like README.Fedora. Post-install echo is not sufficient for anyone not using yum on the command line. This include users of PackageKit, Anaconda or kickstart -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595011] Review Request:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595011 --- Comment #7 from David Highley 2010-05-24 09:29:21 EDT --- I agree with most of the changes, but still think the post install should let the user know that they need to modify the iptables and rsyslog.conf files. If they do not get some kind of prompt then they maybe wondering how to get the package working. I can see not modifying them, some thing we do at work as we have to fix things so they install and uninstall cleanly. With most packages not requiring any user changes they are caught off guard when one is not able to automatically make all the changes needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 582106] Review Request: lifeograph - Private digital diary.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582106 Gowrishankar Rajaiyan changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(graja...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #5 from Gowrishankar Rajaiyan 2010-05-24 08:49:18 EDT --- Hi Mamoru, I am very sorry for the delay. New spec and srpm has been uploaded to the following location: Spec URL: http://gowrishankar.fedorapeople.org/spec/lifeograph.spec SRPM URL: http://gowrishankar.fedorapeople.org/srpms/lifeograph-0.6.2-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590244] Review Request: pinta - Simple Paint Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590244 --- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane 2010-05-24 08:22:47 EDT --- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 458402] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458402 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-24 08:09:19 EDT --- uncrustify-0.56-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/uncrustify-0.56-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
