[Bug 597755] Review Request: openmolar - Open Source Dental Practice Management Software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597755 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) 2010-05-31 02:35:49 EDT --- Thanks Chen, Ah! howcome my eyes missed this file -rw-r--r--1 rootroot27519 Oct 8 2009 /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/openmolar.svg Definitely this package should add to spec gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlet. I see icon is not appearing in menu. I only tested its functionality using menu. Regarding PKG-INFO:- you are correct egg-info already includes them so no need to add PKG-INFO as %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597725] Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597725 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercyp...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Chen Lei 2010-05-31 02:24:05 EDT --- I suggest you to send a mail to fedora-devel to discuss whether firefox entensions are worth to be included in fedora. Currently, very few firefox extensions are packaged and fedora don't have a guideline about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597967] New: Review Request: emacs-ibus - IBus client for GNU Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-ibus - IBus client for GNU Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597967 Summary: Review Request: emacs-ibus - IBus client for GNU Emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: du...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/emacs-ibus/emacs-ibus.spec SRPM URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/emacs-ibus/emacs-ibus-0.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: ibus.el is a IBus client for GNU Emacs. This program allows users on-the-spot style input with IBus. The input statuses are individually kept for each buffer, and prefix-keys such as C-x and C-c can be used even if IBus is active. So you can input various languages fast and comfortably by using it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596449] Review Request: NetworkManager-openswan - NetworkManager VPN plugin for Openswan (IPsec)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596449 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED QAContact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |supercyp...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597755] Review Request: openmolar - Open Source Dental Practice Management Software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597755 --- Comment #5 from Chen Lei 2010-05-31 02:02:32 EDT --- Some more comments: I think you may need add Scriptlet to spec. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache Hi Parag, > 3) Add PKG-INFO to %doc Should python modules include PKG-INFO to %doc? It seems *.egg-info will copy informations from PKG-INFO, I'm not sure about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588941] Review Request: pypy - Implementation of the Python language, using Python itself
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercyp...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Chen Lei 2010-05-31 01:32:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > c) I think these are bogus, just looking at -libs name, but it's not really a > libraries > file. Perhaps it should be something like pypy-library ? Or pypy-lib-python? > I guess it's not a big deal. > > pypy-stackless.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency pypy-libs > pypy-nojit.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency pypy-libs > pypy-sandbox.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency pypy-libs > I suggest to use -common as subpackage name which means this subpackage is shared between different pypy interpreters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597755] Review Request: openmolar - Open Source Dental Practice Management Software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597755 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) 2010-05-31 00:43:41 EDT --- + is ok - Needs work Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2218732 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/main.py 0644L /usr/bin/env openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/settings/_version.py 0644L /usr/bin/env openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/qt4gui/schema_updater.py 0644L /usr/bin/env openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/firstRun.py 0644L /usr/bin/env openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/createdemodatabase.py 0644L /usr/bin/env openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/qt4gui/customwidgets/calendars.py 0644L /usr/bin/env openmolar.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmolar Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 27fff756480eb2072543bf80df8ed2b1d717b08c openmolar-0.1.9.tar.gz 27fff756480eb2072543bf80df8ed2b1d717b08c openmolar-0.1.9.tar.gz.srpm + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + Translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + GUI application and Desktop file installed correctly. Suggestions: 1) If you want either you can ask upstream to include openmolar man page or you can also write it. This is not blocker for review but just a suggestion. 2) remove following from %build as there is no compilation happenings that need RPM_OPT_FLAGS. CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" 3) Add PKG-INFO to %doc APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597755] Review Request: openmolar - Open Source Dental Practice Management Software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597755
--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) 2010-05-31 00:45:21 EDT
---
And If you want to remove shebang which looks not needed, you can use following
in %install
for lib in %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/*.py
%{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/settings/_version.py
%{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/qt4gui/*.py
%{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/qt4gui/customwidgets/*.py ; do
sed '/\/usr\/bin\/env/d' $lib > $lib.new &&
touch -r $lib $lib.new &&
mv $lib.new $lib
done
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581104] Review Request: lv2-EQ10Q-plugins - Parametric equalizer lv2 plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581104 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? Bug 581104 depends on bug 537363, which changed state. Bug 537363 Summary: Review Request: lv2-c++-tools - Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537363 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2010-05-31 00:20:05 EDT --- I made a full review. A few minor things could be added/corrected. Otherwise we are good to go. ! rpmlint complains about spelling errors. lv2-EQ10Q-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) diferent -> different, difference, deferential lv2-EQ10Q-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugin -> plug in, plug-in, plugging lv2-EQ10Q-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US diferent -> different, difference, deferential lv2-EQ10Q-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US biquadratic -> bi quadratic, bi-quadratic, quadratic lv2-EQ10Q-plugins-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) lv -> lb, l, v lv2-EQ10Q-plugins-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lv -> lb, l, v "plug-in" and "different" can be corrected. The rest can be ignored. ? A little explanation on patches would be nice. The patches look quite clean and portable. Did you contact upstream about these? ! Upstream could be reminded about missing license text files. * koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2218755 - I couldn't do a functionality test yet with the static linkage. I will do that whenever people are not sleeping :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596449] Review Request: NetworkManager-openswan - NetworkManager VPN plugin for Openswan (IPsec)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596449 --- Comment #18 from Chen Lei 2010-05-31 00:02:02 EDT --- I can confirm the share-mime-info is useless now, all NM plugins in rawhide don't include desktop files now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597755] Review Request: openmolar - Open Source Dental Practice Management Software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597755 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercyp...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Chen Lei 2010-05-30 23:53:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: > SRPM URL: > Description: > > Rpmlint > === > rpmlint openmolar.spec ../RPMS/noarch/openmolar-0.1.9-1.fc13.noarch.rpm > ../SRPMS/openmolar-0.1.9-1.fc13.src.rpm > openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/main.py 0644L /usr/bin/env > openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/settings/_version.py 0644L > /usr/bin/env > openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/qt4gui/schema_updater.py 0644L > /usr/bin/env > openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/firstRun.py 0644L /usr/bin/env > openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/createdemodatabase.py 0644L > /usr/bin/env > openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/qt4gui/customwidgets/calendars.py > 0644L /usr/bin/env > 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 0 warnings. > > Which can be ignored > Normally, you can remove shebang from those files to avoid rpmlint errors. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Remove_shebang_from_Python_libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597937] Review Request: maven-changelog-plugin - Maven Changelog Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937 --- Comment #1 from huwang 2010-05-30 23:49:28 EDT --- Note about this package: Built with dist-f14-maven221 target in koji, here is the link: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2218736 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597937] New: Review Request: maven-changelog-plugin - Maven Changelog Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maven-changelog-plugin - Maven Changelog Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937 Summary: Review Request: maven-changelog-plugin - Maven Changelog Plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: huw...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://huwang.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven_changelog_plugin/maven-changelog-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://huwang.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven_changelog_plugin/maven-changelog-plugin-2.2-1.src.rpm Description: Produce SCM changelog reports. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597681] Review Request: -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597681 Ulrik changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ulrik.sverd...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Ulrik 2010-05-30 23:40:02 EDT --- I suggest you should configure kupfer with --no-runtime-deps ; this configuration option is made specially for packaging. You can contact me for further guidiance if you wish. Building the man pages automatically conflicts with the --no-runtime-deps option. You can do it manually in the package (or I can fix it in a later version); anyhow I recommend fedora to build & install the man page for kupfer; you need rst2man for that (python-docutils). Debian can serve as inspiration, here is their rules file: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/python-apps/packages/kupfer/trunk/debian/rulesa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell hardware description library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376 --- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen 2010-05-30 23:01:41 EDT --- Thanks for the update. (In reply to comment #21) > Thanks for the second patch. I have updated and tested the package. Looks > good! Cool: later I may address your rfe for supporting datadir files from ghc-rpm-macros, but for I think this packaging should be good enough. > $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i686/ghc-chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1-5.fc12.i686.rpm > ghc-chalmers-lava2000.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object > /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.2/chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1/libHSchalmers-lava2000-1.1.1-ghc6.12.2.so (I am thinking cabal2spec should probably be updated to strip binaries and object files.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597726] Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597726 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||panem...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) 2010-05-30 23:05:19 EDT --- Please submit only once. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 597725 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596661] Review Request: molengo-fonts - A Latin typeface for documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596661
Daiki Ueno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Daiki Ueno 2010-05-30 23:01:12 EDT ---
Looks ok.
It would be better to pass "-y" to 7za:
7za x -y %{SOURCE0}
for rebuild (currently it prompts user before extraction).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597729] Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597729 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||panem...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) 2010-05-30 23:05:23 EDT --- Please submit only once. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 597725 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597725] Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597725 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) 2010-05-30 23:05:19 EDT --- *** Bug 597726 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597725] Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597725 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) 2010-05-30 23:05:23 EDT --- *** Bug 597729 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596660] Review Request: crimson-text-fonts - A latin font for the production of technical books and papers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596660
Daiki Ueno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Daiki Ueno 2010-05-30 22:47:51 EDT ---
Sorry, one more thing. There is a critical typo in %install:
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}
should be:
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE3} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}
I wonder why I didn't notice this in the previous test.
All the rest looks ok.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596659] Review Request: ofl-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts - Goudy Oldstyle and Italic fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596659 Daiki Ueno changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Daiki Ueno 2010-05-30 22:32:20 EDT --- Looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588941] Review Request: pypy - Implementation of the Python language, using Python itself
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-05-30 22:19:17 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. See below - Sources match upstream md5sum: d423bd7dfbfbcfebb8435e55bcb36516 pypy-1.2-src.tar.bz2 d423bd7dfbfbcfebb8435e55bcb36516 pypy-1.2-src.tar.bz2.orig OK - BuildRequires correct See below - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. See below - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. See below - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. Can you use " and " in the License tag between Licenses, not commas? (This is an and I think, not an or) 2. Can you fix the Source0 to use the full upstream url? http://pypy.org/download/pypy-1.2-src.tar.bz2 3. Should the Requires: pypy-libs be versioned? 4. I assume there's not any parallel make support here? Would sure be nice to speed up the build. 5. rpmlint says: a) Fixed by using 'and': pypy.src: W: invalid-license MIT, PSL, LGPL, Distributable pypy-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT, PSL, LGPL, Distributable pypy-libs.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT, PSL, LGPL, Distributable pypy-nojit.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT, PSL, LGPL, Distributable pypy-sandbox.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT, PSL, LGPL, Distributable pypy-stackless.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT, PSL, LGPL, Distributable b) Fixed by using full url: pypy.src: W: invalid-url Source0: pypy-1.2-src.tar.bz2 c) I think these are bogus, just looking at -libs name, but it's not really a libraries file. Perhaps it should be something like pypy-library ? Or pypy-lib-python? I guess it's not a big deal. pypy-stackless.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency pypy-libs pypy-nojit.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency pypy-libs pypy-sandbox.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency pypy-libs d) I can see why this is, but not sure on a solution. Supress debuginfo? pypy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources e) What is this link for? pypy-libs.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/pypy-1.2/pypy/lib/py ../../py f) Might be worth fixing the non executable py files to not have the python shebang? pypy-libs.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pypy-1.2/lib-python/2.5.2/test/test_bz2.py 0644L /usr/bin/python pypy-libs.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pypy-1.2/lib-python/modified-2.5.2/test/test_optparse.py 0644L /usr/bin/python pypy-libs.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pypy-1.2/lib-python/2.5.2/plat-freebsd7/regen 0644L /bin/sh pypy-libs.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pypy-1.2/lib-python/modified-2.5.2/test/test_sets.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pypy-libs.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pypy-1.2/lib-python/2.5.2/test/test_codecmaps_jp.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pypy-libs.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pypy-1.2/lib-python/2.5.2/test/test_tcl.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pypy-libs.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/pypy-1.2/lib-python/2.5.2/plat-sunos5/SUNAUDIODEV.py pypy-libs.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/pypy-1.2/lib-python/2.5.2/plat-irix5/IN.py pypy-libs.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pypy-1.2/lib-python/2.5.2/unittest.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pypy-libs.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pypy-1.2/pypy/lib/md5.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pypy-libs.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pypy-1.2/lib-python/2.5.2/test/test_anydbm.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pypy-libs.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pypy-1.2/lib-python/2.5.2/difflib.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pypy-libs.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/pypy-1.2/lib-python/2.5.2/plat-irix5/AL.py pypy-libs.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/pypy-1.2/lib-python/2.5.2/plat-irix5/CD.py pypy-libs.x86_64: E: non-exec
[Bug 596074] Review Request: multithreadedtc - A framework for testing concurrent Java application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596074 huwang changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579449] Review Request: emacs-common-riece - Yet Another IRC Client for Emacs and XEmacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579449 --- Comment #2 from Daiki Ueno 2010-05-30 22:08:14 EDT --- Packaged new upstream release, which incorporates patches for Fedora. Now the spec became simpler and easier to review. Spec URL: http://www.unixuser.org/~ueno/software/fedora/riece/emacs-common-riece.spec SRPM URL: http://www.unixuser.org/~ueno/software/fedora/riece/emacs-common-riece-7.0.0-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591926] Review Request: erlang-mochiweb - An Erlang library for building lightweight HTTP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591926 --- Comment #3 from David Cantrell 2010-05-30 20:11:02 EDT --- Looks good except for the version referenced in the %changelog should be: 1.3-0.1.20100507svn159 That will fix up: erlang-mochiweb.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0-0.1.svn154 ['1.3-0.1.20100507svn159.fc13', '1.3-0.1.20100507svn159'] Ready to approve after that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581279] Review Request: erlang-ibrowse - Erlang HTTP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581279
--- Comment #8 from David Cantrell 2010-05-30 20:08:43
EDT ---
Actually, the %{alphatag} usage still needs a datestamp instead of just
".gita114ed3b"
Should be (for example):
%define alphatag 20100530gita114ed3b
Release: 0.1.%{alphatag}%{?dist}
Becase this is still considered a snapshot release given how the source is
pulled from git.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581279] Review Request: erlang-ibrowse - Erlang HTTP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581279
--- Comment #7 from David Cantrell 2010-05-30 20:02:20
EDT ---
There are some new rpmlint warnings too:
$ rpmlint erlang-ibrowse-1.6.0-0.1.gita114ed3b.fc13.src.rpm
erlang-ibrowse.src:15: W: macro-in-comment %{realname}
erlang-ibrowse.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
erlang-ibrowse.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
erlang-ibrowse.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %{gitver}
erlang-ibrowse.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
erlang-ibrowse.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
erlang-ibrowse.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %{gitver}
However, these are just in the comment lines, so I don't really care. If you
want to suppress the rpmlint warning, you can use %% in the comment like you
would in the %changelog section, though I don't really care. Your choice.
(The other warnings appearing are ones that we have already been over and are
ok for this package.)
If you can get clarification on the licensing issue, I'll approve the package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581279] Review Request: erlang-ibrowse - Erlang HTTP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581279 --- Comment #6 from David Cantrell 2010-05-30 19:56:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > > license. > > > > The License field indicates 'BSD or LGPLv2' but it should be 'BSD and > > LGPLv2'. > > I'm afraid that you're wrong here. > > "ibrowse is available under two different licenses. LGPL and the BSD license." > > This sounds for me like ibrowse can be used either under LGPLv2+ (2+ is > explicitly stated in the attached license) or under BSD. That's not how I read the line in the README file. In fact, I believe the line is too ambiguous. The first sentence indicates the software is available under two licenses. The second sentence uses "and" to join the two licenses, and given that the first sentence doesn't clearly state that it is your choice of license, one can only safely conclude that the software is under both licenses. The source code does not make use of license boilerplate text, it's not easy to tell if the author meant that it is your choice of license or if some of the software is under the BSD license or some of it is under the LGPL license. However, if that was the case, the entire collection would constitute a derived work and only the LGPL would apply. Can you get clarification from the author on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593841] Review Request: wicd - Wireless and wired network connection manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593841 --- Comment #25 from David Cantrell 2010-05-30 19:08:04 EDT --- Fixed the init script (and reported upstream as https://bugs.launchpad.net/wicd/+bug/587690) New spec and srpm uploaded: http://dcantrel.fedorapeople.org/wicd/wicd.spec http://dcantrel.fedorapeople.org/wicd/wicd-1.7.0-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597888] Review Request: spek - free acoustic spectrum analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597888 cdonat...@lavabit.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597888] New: Review Request: spek - free acoustic spectrum analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spek - free acoustic spectrum analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597888 Summary: Review Request: spek - free acoustic spectrum analyzer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cdonat...@lavabit.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Hi, This is my first package, so I need a sponsor and a review. Thanks Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6598054/spek.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6598054/spek-0.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Spek helps to analyze your audio files by showing their spectrogram. Spectrograms are used to analyze the quality of audio files, you can easily detect lossy re-encodes, web-rips and other badness by just looking at the spectrogram. Spek uses GStreamer to read audio files which means it supports most file formats you can think of. ScratchBuild : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2218397 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594839] Review Request: kpartsplugin - KParts technology to embed file viewers into non-KDE browsers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594839 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-30 15:24:28 EDT --- kpartsplugin-0.0.1-0.2.20100521.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kpartsplugin-0.0.1-0.2.20100521.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594839] Review Request: kpartsplugin - KParts technology to embed file viewers into non-KDE browsers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594839 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-30 15:24:23 EDT --- kpartsplugin-0.0.1-0.2.20100521.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kpartsplugin-0.0.1-0.2.20100521.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554243] Review Request: moovida - Media Center
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554243 --- Comment #25 from Alex Lancaster 2010-05-30 15:05:25 EDT --- Hi Peter, any chance you'll be able to look into doing a review? Now that elisa has been completely removed from Fedora it would be great to get moovida back in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596746] Review Request: bzr-explorer - GUI application for using Bazaar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596746 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a.bad...@gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-05-30 14:39:55 EDT --- Yep, I'm willing to move things around. So -- do we want: /usr/share/pixmaps/bzr-64.png for everything? Or: /usr/share/pixmaps/bzr.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591730] Review Request: pyjamas - A python to Javascript compiler, Widget set, Framework and Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591730
Chen Lei changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||supercyp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #9 from Chen Lei 2010-05-30 14:15:14 EDT ---
Will it be better to install examples and doc to %{_docdir} instead of
%{datadir}?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Examples
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594744] Review Request: zint - A barcode generator and library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594744 --- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking 2010-05-30 13:49:34 EDT --- Spec URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/zint/zint.spec SRPM URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/zint/zint-2.3.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Updated to release 2.3.2. koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2218169 $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-13-x86_64/result/zint-*.rpm zint.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) barcode -> bar code, bar-code, barcarole zint.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcode -> bar code, bar-code, barcarole zint.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US symbologies -> symbolizes, symbolize, symbolism zint.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) barcode -> bar code, bar-code, barcarole zint.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcode -> bar code, bar-code, barcarole zint.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US symbologies -> symbolizes, symbolize, symbolism zint.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zint zint-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation zint-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcode -> bar code, bar-code, barcarole zint-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation zint-qt.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar codes, bar-codes, barcaroles zint-qt.x86_64: W: no-documentation zint-qt.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zint-qt zint-qt-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libs -> lobs, lib, lbs zint-qt-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation zint-qt-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcode -> bar code, bar-code, barcarole zint-qt-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 17 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 584090] Review Request: mashpodde - mashpodder is a podcatching client based on BashPodder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584090 --- Comment #8 from Mohammed Imran 2010-05-30 09:55:25 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578990] Review Request: nimrod - A new statically typed, imperative programming Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578990 --- Comment #3 from Mohammed Imran 2010-05-30 09:53:34 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581131] Review Request: circuslinux - Gameplay is similar to "Breakout" and "Arkanoid"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581131 Mohammed Imran changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|imran...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597725] Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597725 --- Comment #2 from Mohammed Imran 2010-05-30 09:36:08 EDT --- *** Bug 597721 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597721] Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597721 Mohammed Imran changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Mohammed Imran 2010-05-30 09:36:08 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 597725 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597722] Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597722 Mohammed Imran changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||imran...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Mohammed Imran 2010-05-30 09:33:07 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 597725 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597725] Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597725 --- Comment #1 from Mohammed Imran 2010-05-30 09:33:07 EDT --- *** Bug 597722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597725] Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597725 Mohammed Imran changed: What|Removed |Added CC||imran...@gmail.com Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597771] New: Review Request: toothchart - Graphically shows how a baby's primary teeth have erupted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: toothchart - Graphically shows how a baby's primary teeth have erupted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597771 Summary: Review Request: toothchart - Graphically shows how a baby's primary teeth have erupted Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: raghunat...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/toothchart.spec SRPM URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/toothchart-beta.0.02.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: The Baby Tooth chart is a PHP script which graphically shows how a baby's primary teeth have erupted - Eventually it'll become a POST/PHP-Nuke module. Uses only PHP and static images (i.e. no PHP graphics or FLASH, so no extra libraries needed). koji link : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2217925 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581161] Review Request: cowpatty - Audit WPA pre-shared keys
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581161 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-30 09:11:48 EDT --- cowpatty-4.6-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cowpatty-4.6-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709 --- Comment #1 from Shreyank Gupta 2010-05-30 07:35:31 EDT --- rpmlint output is : rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/lib/ncursesw_bin.so rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ncursesw_bin.so rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/form_wrap.c rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ri/Ncurses/Destroy_checker/destroyed%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/menu_wrap.h rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ri/Ncurses/Menu/MENU/user_object%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/menu_wrap.c rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/panel_wrap.c rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ri/Ncurses/Form/FORM/user_object%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ncurses_wrap.c rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/form_wrap.h rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ncurses_wrap.h rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ri/Ncurses/Menu/ITEM/user_object%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ri/Ncurses/Form/FIELD/user_object%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ri/Ncurses/WINDOW/respond_to%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/panel_wrap.h --- 1. Do I split the the files into a devel subpackage? 2. How do i solve the 'unstripped-binary-or-object' problem? --- koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2217882 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597755] Review Request: openmolar - Open Source Dental Practice Management Software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597755 --- Comment #1 from Mohammed Imran 2010-05-30 07:33:22 EDT --- Spec URL: http://github.com/downloads/matriux/fedora/openmolar.spec SRPM URL: http://github.com/downloads/matriux/fedora/openmolar-0.1.9-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Dental Practice Management Suite, using a Mysql database server to maintain patient records, accounts, and correspondence. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709 Shreyank Gupta changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583869] Review Request: python-plwm - python module for making window managers for keyboard-loving programmers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583869 Rangeen Basu Roy Chowdhury changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: plwm - |Review Request: python-plwm |Modular X window manager|- python module for making |for keyboard-loving |window managers for |programmers |keyboard-loving programmers --- Comment #7 from Rangeen Basu Roy Chowdhury 2010-05-30 07:23:47 EDT --- Updated Spec file http://sherry151.fedorapeople.org/python-plwm.spec http://sherry151.fedorapeople.org/python-plwm-2.7-0.3.rc1.fc13.src.rpm Reverting back to the name python-plwm as it is not a Window manager by itself and is rather a python module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596746] Review Request: bzr-explorer - GUI application for using Bazaar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596746 --- Comment #13 from Julian Aloofi 2010-05-30 07:22:50 EDT --- But the maintainer of our main bzr package could put an icon in that, so we wouldn't have the icon in both bzr-gtk and bzr-explorer. Then they could both use the icon from the main bzr package as they depend on it anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597755] New: Review Request: openmolar - Open Source Dental Practice Management Software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openmolar - Open Source Dental Practice Management Software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597755 Summary: Review Request: openmolar - Open Source Dental Practice Management Software Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: imran...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: Rpmlint === rpmlint openmolar.spec ../RPMS/noarch/openmolar-0.1.9-1.fc13.noarch.rpm ../SRPMS/openmolar-0.1.9-1.fc13.src.rpm openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/main.py 0644L /usr/bin/env openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/settings/_version.py 0644L /usr/bin/env openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/qt4gui/schema_updater.py 0644L /usr/bin/env openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/firstRun.py 0644L /usr/bin/env openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/createdemodatabase.py 0644L /usr/bin/env openmolar.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openmolar/qt4gui/customwidgets/calendars.py 0644L /usr/bin/env 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 0 warnings. Which can be ignored koji scratch build === http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2217880 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591982] Review Request: batti - Simple battery monitor for the system tray
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591982 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2010-05-30 07:12:54 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Martin! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: batti Short Description: Simple battery monitor for the system tray Owners: cwickert tomspur Branches: F-12 F-13 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583531] Review Request: mozilla-firetray - A system tray addon for mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583531 --- Comment #7 from Hicham HAOUARI 2010-05-30 06:38:32 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/firetray.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/firetray-0.2.6-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583531] Review Request: mozilla-firetray - A system tray addon for mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583531 --- Comment #8 from Hicham HAOUARI 2010-05-30 06:39:33 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/mozilla-firetray.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/mozilla-firetray-0.2.6-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591190] Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591190 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius 2010-05-30 06:14:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > also po4a is not available in > fedora. Wrong, po4a is available in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597729] New: Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597729 Summary: Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: raghunat...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/mozilla-svg-edit.spec SRPM URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description:SVG-edit is a fast,web-based,Javascript-driven SVG editor that works in any modern browser. rpmlint mozilla-svg-edit.spec ../RPMS/noarch/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.noarch.rpm ../SRPMS/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm mozilla-svg-edit.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. koji Link : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2217850 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597726] New: Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597726 Summary: Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: raghunat...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/mozilla-svg-edit.spec SRPM URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description:SVG-edit is a fast,web-based,Javascript-driven SVG editor that works in any modern browser. rpmlint mozilla-svg-edit.spec ../RPMS/noarch/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.noarch.rpm ../SRPMS/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm mozilla-svg-edit.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. koji Link : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2217850 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597681] Review Request: -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597681 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pa...@hubbitus.info --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-05-30 06:10:37 EDT --- May be you need pygtk2-devel ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597725] New: Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597725 Summary: Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: raghunat...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/mozilla-svg-edit.spec SRPM URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description:SVG-edit is a fast,web-based,Javascript-driven SVG editor that works in any modern browser. rpmlint mozilla-svg-edit.spec ../RPMS/noarch/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.noarch.rpm ../SRPMS/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm mozilla-svg-edit.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. koji Link : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2217850 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597722] New: Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597722 Summary: Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: raghunat...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/mozilla-svg-edit.spec SRPM URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description:SVG-edit is a fast,web-based,Javascript-driven SVG editor that works in any modern browser. rpmlint mozilla-svg-edit.spec ../RPMS/noarch/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.noarch.rpm ../SRPMS/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm mozilla-svg-edit.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. koji Link : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2217850 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597721] New: Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597721 Summary: Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: raghunat...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/mozilla-svg-edit.spec SRPM URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description:SVG-edit is a fast,web-based,Javascript-driven SVG editor that works in any modern browser. rpmlint mozilla-svg-edit.spec ../RPMS/noarch/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.noarch.rpm ../SRPMS/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm mozilla-svg-edit.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. koji Link : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2217850 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591190] Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591190
--- Comment #3 from Chen Lei 2010-05-30 05:29:52 EDT ---
rpmlint debhelper-7.4.20-2.fc12.buildsys.src.rpm
debhelper.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) debian -> Debian
debhelper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US debian -> Debian
debhelper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US debconf -> debonair,
deacon, debouch
debhelper.src:11: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line
11)
The last warning should be fixed.
Some other comments about spec:
Requires: man is not needed.
%doc examples/ doc/ could be changed to %doc examples/ doc/*.
BuildRequires: dpkg-devel seems not needed, also po4a is not available in
fedora.
For man page, lang(locale) should add before %{_mandir}/locale/ or use gettext
(%find_lang --with-man)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591190] Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591190 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|supercyp...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591190] Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591190 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597709] New: Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sgu...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://shreyankg.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ncursesw/rubygem-ncursesw.spec SRPM URL: http://shreyankg.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ncursesw/rubygem-ncursesw-1.2.4.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Hacked up version of ncurses gem that supports wide characters and ruby1.9.1. Original ncurses gem by t-pet...@users.berlios.de. Spec and SRPM built using gem2rpm utility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561286] Review Request: libdmtx - Library for working with Data Matrix 2D barcodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561286 --- Comment #5 from Dan Horák 2010-05-30 04:42:19 EDT --- Updated Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/reviews/libdmtx.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/reviews/libdmtx-0.7.2-2.fc14.src.rpm ChangeLog: - added subpackages with php/python/ruby bindings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 520569] Review Request: uboot-mkimage - U-Boot mkimage utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520569 --- Comment #9 from Dan Horák 2010-05-30 04:09:22 EDT --- Updated Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/uboot-tools.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/uboot-tools-2010.03-1.fc14.src.rpm ChangeLog: - updated to U-Boot 2010.03 - updated Summary, added docs - resolved issues when a cross-compiler would be called -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597700] Review Request: accessx - Open source utility to set and display all of the XKEYBOARD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597700 Rahul Sundaram changed: What|Removed |Added CC||methe...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|methe...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596746] Review Request: bzr-explorer - GUI application for using Bazaar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596746 --- Comment #12 from Alexander Belchenko 2010-05-30 03:24:25 EDT --- IIRC there is no bzr.png in the main bzr tarball, only bzr.ico (Windows-style icon). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597700] Review Request: accessx - Open source utility to set and display all of the XKEYBOARD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597700 --- Comment #2 from Kushal Das 2010-05-30 03:22:53 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.sugarlabs.org/kushal/accessx.spec SRPM URL: http://people.sugarlabs.org/kushal/accessx-0.951-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597700] New: Review Request: accessx - Open source utility to set and display all of the XKEYBOARD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: accessx - Open source utility to set and display all of the XKEYBOARD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597700 Summary: Review Request: accessx - Open source utility to set and display all of the XKEYBOARD Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushal...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.sugarlabs.org/kushal/accessx.spec SRPM URL: http://people.sugarlabs.org/kushal/accessx-0.951-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: An open source utility to set and display all of the XKEYBOARD (XKB) AccessX features. It is designed to mimic the interface provided by the Sun and DEC "accessx" tool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597700] Review Request: accessx - Open source utility to set and display all of the XKEYBOARD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597700 --- Comment #1 from Kushal Das 2010-05-30 03:18:40 EDT --- No rpmlint errors, koji build successful. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2217746 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
