[Bug 600243] Review Request: libjpeg-turbo - MMX/SSE accelerated libjpeg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243 --- Comment #21 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2010-06-13 04:33:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) --whatrequires libjpeg-static returns no matches, Well, of course not. Please review what static linking means. If something in package A links against a static library in package B-static, then A also needs BuildRequires: B-static. Otherwise you just can't build against the static library if it isn't present at build time. My repoquery queried *source* packages for such BuildRequires. Since the result was empty, it is safe to say in current rawhide, no package uses libjpeg-static for building. Is that clearer now, Tom? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #70 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-13 05:05:40 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-1.21-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-translatoid-1.21-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #69 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-13 05:05:26 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-1.21-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-translatoid-1.21-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #71 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-13 05:05:45 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-1.21-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-translatoid-1.21-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594744] Review Request: zint - A barcode generator and library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594744 --- Comment #13 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-06-13 05:57:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) Thanks for the review! (In reply to comment #10) After reconsideration of this package, I agree with you that -libs and -qt-libs subpackages are not necessary, you can merge them back with main package and -qt package. Yes, I think it's probably better to reduce the number of tiny subpackages and bundle the programs with their corresponding shlib (as in 2.3.1-1). Thanks again. From the manual of Zint, I realized that libzint and zint-qt are the main part of the Zint. zint command line utility and libQzint are not so important, they are pretty tiny. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603311] Review Request: R-caTools - Tools: moving window statistics, gif, base64, roc auc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603311 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||supercyp...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|supercyp...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603311] Review Request: R-caTools - Tools: moving window statistics, gif, base64, roc auc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603311 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-06-13 06:20:58 EDT --- The package is already reviewed by the submitter, spec file is petty file. rpmlint only showes some harmless warnings which can be ignored. rpmlint R-caTools-* R-caTools.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gif - fig, gig, if R-caTools.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) roc - cor, rock, Kroc R-caTools.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) auc - aux, ac, arc R-caTools.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Tools: moving window statistics, gif, base64, roc auc... R-caTools.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cumsum - cum sum, cum-sum, cums um License field matches the upstream license. The source used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum checksum 19c479fa167ffba886764c0059fc6824 This package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603311] Review Request: R-caTools - Tools: moving window statistics, gif, base64, roc auc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603311 Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr 2010-06-13 06:28:01 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: R-caTools Short Description: Tools: moving window statistics, gif, base64, roc auc... Owners: pingou Branches: F-13 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603481] New: Review Request: freerdp - remote desktop protocol client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: freerdp - remote desktop protocol client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603481 Summary: Review Request: freerdp - remote desktop protocol client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: m...@kiilerich.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kiilerix.fedorapeople.org/freerdp.spec SRPM URL: http://kiilerix.fedorapeople.org/freerdp-0.7.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: freerdp implements Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), used in a number of Microsoft products. freerdp is a fast-moving fork of rdesktop. The default client for X is called xfreerdp. Scratch build on http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2247476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603514] New: Review Request: libmodman - A simple library for managing C++ modules (plug-ins)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libmodman - A simple library for managing C++ modules (plug-ins) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603514 Summary: Review Request: libmodman - A simple library for managing C++ modules (plug-ins) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nathan...@natemccallum.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nathaniel.themccallums.org/rpms/libmodman.spec SRPM URL: http://nathaniel.themccallums.org/rpms/libmodman-1.0.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Ian Weller will review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588406] Review Request: rubygem-buildr - Ruby Based build system that uses Maven style repositories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588406 Bug 588406 depends on bug 602348, which changed state. Bug 602348 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-net-ssh - A Ruby ssh client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602348 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601633] Review Request: sup - A console-based email client written in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601633 Bug 601633 depends on bug 602348, which changed state. Bug 602348 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-net-ssh - A Ruby ssh client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602348 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602348] Review Request: rubygem-net-ssh - A Ruby ssh client library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602348 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-06-13 12:59:42 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588446] Review Request: rubygem-sftp sftp support for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588446 Bug 588446 depends on bug 602348, which changed state. Bug 602348 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-net-ssh - A Ruby ssh client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602348 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603514] Review Request: libmodman - A simple library for managing C++ modules (plug-ins)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603514 Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||603517 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603518] New: Review Request: pyip - Python assembling/disassembling of raw ip packets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pyip - Python assembling/disassembling of raw ip packets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603518 Summary: Review Request: pyip - Python assembling/disassembling of raw ip packets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nathan...@natemccallum.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nathaniel.themccallums.org/rpms/pyip.spec SRPM URL: http://nathaniel.themccallums.org/rpms/pyip-0.7-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: pyip is a Python package offering assembling/disassembling of raw ip packet, including ip, udp, and icmp. Also it includes 2 utilities based on raw ip, traceroute and ping. The primary motivation for this project is to fill the blank in Python, i.e., handling raw ip packet. Meanwhile, the utility 'traceroute' is intended to be port of Unix 'traceroute' to Windows platform, as Windows' tracert has only very limited command line options compared with Unix 'traceroute'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603521] New: Review Request: pynetsnmp - Python ctypes bindings for NET-SNMP with Twisted integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pynetsnmp - Python ctypes bindings for NET-SNMP with Twisted integration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603521 Summary: Review Request: pynetsnmp - Python ctypes bindings for NET-SNMP with Twisted integration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nathan...@natemccallum.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nathaniel.themccallums.org/rpms/pynetsnmp.spec SRPM URL: http://nathaniel.themccallums.org/rpms/pynetsnmp-0.28.14-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Python ctypes bindings for NET-SNMP with Twisted integration pynetsnmp is a set of Python ctypes binding for NET-SNMP, an implementation of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). pynetsnmp is a replacement for the various Python bindings provided by PySNMP* implementations. It also implements a glue with the Python Twisted Matrix networking framework which replaces the TwistedSNMP implementation. Will be reviewed by Ian Weller. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583531] Review Request: mozilla-firetray - A system tray addon for mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583531 --- Comment #11 from Hicham HAOUARI hicham.haou...@gmail.com 2010-06-13 13:11:08 EDT --- seems like this is getting nowhere, closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583531] Review Request: mozilla-firetray - A system tray addon for mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583531 Hicham HAOUARI hicham.haou...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530910] Review Request: hyena - Hyena is a library of GUI and non-GUI C# code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530910 Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bnoc...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 2010-06-13 13:39:20 EDT --- Builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2247715 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537639] Review Request: hyena - A C# library used to make awesome applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537639 --- Comment #4 from Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 2010-06-13 13:41:28 EDT --- Bug 530910 is a duplicate, with a reviewer and updated versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530910] Review Request: hyena - Hyena is a library of GUI and non-GUI C# code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530910 --- Comment #6 from Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 2010-06-13 13:44:39 EDT --- 537639 is a duplicate, though it doesn't have a reviewer, or updated packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600682] Review Request: R-GenomicFeatures - A transient package to store various Genomic Features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600682
Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@sandro-mathys.ch
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2010-06-13 14:00:10
EDT ---
First I noticed that %description ends with a , and I think an etc. went
missing there. Please make sure the sentence has a grammatically correct
ending.
---
OK MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
$ rpmlint {SPECS,RPMS/noarch,SRPMS}/R-GenomicFeatures*
R-GenomicFeatures.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) genomic - gnomic,
genome, genocide
R-GenomicFeatures.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) genomic - gnomic,
genome, genocide
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Those warnings can be ignored.
OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
NA MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
b079f50fbf30f71606022dad8f980399 GenomicFeatures_0.0.9.tar.gz
b079f50fbf30f71606022dad8f980399 rpmbuild/SOURCES/GenomicFeatures_0.0.9.tar.gz
OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
NA MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
!! MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
R-IRanges is missing in BR.
NA MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
NA MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
NA MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
NA MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
OK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must
run properly if it is not present.
NA MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
NA MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
NA MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and
[Bug 599097] Review Request: libgexiv2 - Gexiv2 is a GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599097
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|martin.giesek...@uos.de
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #16 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2010-06-13
14:18:03 EDT ---
Here's the formal review. The package looks almost fine to me, except one
remaining aspect:
- replace %{_includedir}/gexiv2/* with %{_includedir}/gexiv2/
to make the package own the directory too (and not only the header files)
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-13-x86_64/result/*.rpm
libgexiv2.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Gexiv - Ge xiv, Ge-xiv, Gelid
libgexiv2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libgexiv - Libreville,
Liberian, Liberia
libgexiv2.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Gexiv - Ge xiv, Ge-xiv,
Gelid
libgexiv2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libgexiv -
Libreville, Liberian, Liberia
libgexiv2-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libgexiv -
Libreville, Liberian, Liberia
libgexiv2-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libgexiv -
Libreville, Liberian, Liberia
libgexiv2-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libgexiv -
Libreville, Liberian, Liberia
libgexiv2-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libgexiv -
Libreville, Liberian, Liberia
libgexiv2-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.
The above spelling errors can be ignored.
-
keys used in following checklist:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum libgexiv2-0.0.91.tar.gz*
16b6252efabb196ae2bf799104caa0cc libgexiv2-0.0.91.tar.gz
16b6252efabb196ae2bf799104caa0cc libgexiv2-0.0.91.tar.gz.1
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[+] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[X] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
- directory %{_includedir}/gexiv2/ must be owned by the -devel package
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[+] MUST: Library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package.
[+] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications ...
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot}.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned
[Bug 601633] Review Request: sup - A console-based email client written in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601633 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-06-13 14:35:16 EDT --- Some notes: * Naming - As this is based on sup gem, please name rpm as rubygem-sup anyway (because installed rpm can be used as sup gem). * Explicit version dependency - Usually when a package depends on an other package with specific dependency, if the (latter) package on Fedora satisfies the version dependency on all supported branches, we regards it jus redundant to write such version dependency explicitly. - For example rubygem-mime-types when Fedora 12 is released has EVR 1.16-3.fc11, so we regard writing = 1 dependency on Requires: rubygem(mime-types) is just redundant Note that this package can be imported on Fedora 12 and above (we cannot add new package on Fedora 11 anymore) * %gemdir/bin scripts treatment - We usually * move files under %gemdir/bin to %_bindir * then just do rmdir %buildroot/%gemdir * and don't move files under %geminstdir/bin As you actually modified gemspec file, it should be that scripts under %gemdir/bin can correctly be used ! and anyway $ ruby -rubygems -e 'gem sup' should succeed. * ncurses dependency - This package installs %geminstdir/lib/ncurses.rb - I don't think this file is needed because ruby-ncurses rpm is to be installed. - Also this file contains -- 21 require ncurses.so -- however ncurses.so cannot be found (note that ruby-ncurses contains %ruby_sitearch/ncurses_bin.so) So please remove this file to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602791] Review Request: xrootd - Extended ROOT file server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602791
Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch
QAContact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |steve.tray...@cern.ch
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-06-13 15:55:13
EDT ---
Review: xrootd
Date: Jun 13th 2010.
Mock Build: F13, x86_64 , OK
* COMMENT: rpmlint output
$ rpmlint SPECS/xrootd.spec RPMS/x86_64/xrootd-*
RPMS/noarch/xrootd-doc-20100315-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
SRPMS/xrootd-20100315-1.fc13.src.rpm
SPECS/xrootd.spec: W: invalid-url Source1: xrootd-manpages.tar.gz
SPECS/xrootd.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://xrootd.slac.stanford.edu/download/20100315-1007/xrootd-20100315-1007.src.tgz
urlopen error [Errno 113] No route to host
xrootd.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/xrootd xrootd
xrootd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/xrootd xrootd
+ Expected.
xrootd.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary XrdCnsd
xrootd-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cns_ssi
xrootd-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mpxstats
xrootd-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xrdmonCollector
xrootd-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xrdadler32
xrootd-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xrdtestclient
xrootd-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xrdmonAdmin
xrootd-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary frm_admin
xrootd-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xrdtestserver
xrootd-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary XrdAccTest
xrootd-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary frm_pstga
xrootd-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary frm_pstgd
xrootd-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary TestXrdClient
xrootd-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wait41
xrootd-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary TestXrdClient_read
xrootd-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xrdsssadmin
xrootd-client-admin-java.x86_64: W: no-documentation
xrootd-client-admin-perl.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
http://xrootd.slac.stanford.edu/ urlopen error [Errno 113] No route to host
xrootd-client-admin-perl.x86_64: W: no-documentation
xrootd-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libXrdPosix.so.0.0.0
_e...@glibc_2.2.5
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libXrdClient.so.0.0.0
e...@glibc_2.2.5
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libXrdRootd.so.0.0.0
_e...@glibc_2.2.5
Can you open a bug upstream.
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libXrdRootd.so
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libXrdSecunix.so
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libXrdCryptossl.so
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libXrdSec.so
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libXrdAcc.so
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libXrdSecsss.so
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libXrdBwm.so
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libXrdSecpwd.so
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libXrdSecgsi.so
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libXrdOfs.so
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libXrdSeckrb5.so
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libXrdSecgsiGMAPLADP.so
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libXrdCrypto.so
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libXrdProxy.so
You have explained these.
xrootd.src: W: invalid-url Source1: xrootd-manpages.tar.gz
It's not really obvious where this comes from.
9 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 53 warnings.
* PASS: Named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
Yes, tar ball is called root.
* PASS: spec file name same as base package %{name}.
Yes.
* YES: Packaging Guidelines.
* PASS: Approved license in .spec file.
BSD
* COMMENTS: License on Source code.
BSD genrally, e.g src/Xrd/XrdInfo.cc
however man pages appear to be LGPL and
src/XrdSecssl/libsslGridSite/* is BSD/ASL2.0.
See below.
* PASS: Include LICENSE file or similar if it exist.
Does not appear to be one to include.
* PASS: Written in American English.
Yes
* PASS: Spec file legible.
Yes
* PASS: Included source must match upstream source.
$ md5sum
[Bug 594844] Review Request: iec16022 - Generate ISO/IEC 16022 2D barcodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594844 --- Comment #15 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2010-06-13 17:06:42 EDT --- Tareq: ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578135] Review Request: patcher - Quick creation of patches against a project source tree
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578135 --- Comment #6 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2010-06-13 17:13:38 EDT --- Hi Michael, still any interest in maintaining patcher in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591730] Review Request: pyjamas - A python to Javascript compiler, Widget set, Framework and Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591730 --- Comment #21 from luke kenneth casson leighton l...@lkcl.net 2010-06-13 17:59:05 EDT --- ok i can confirm that pyjamas-desktop works, which is a really nice surprise. right now we have a bit of a situation with python-xpcom / xulrunner on ubuntu: they've upgraded to xulrunner 1.9.2, and it's a dog's dinner, with _all_ reverse-dependencies being simply cut (including hulahop). python-xpcom has been _removed_ from xulrunner by the mozilla foundation, and the mozilla foundation is distinctly losing the plot, focussing on javascript, javascript, javascript, and speed, speed, speed. but please _don't_ do what ubuntu did, which was, on discovering the above, entirely remove pyjamas from ubuntu. lots of users are complaining: all they had to do was temporarily remove pyjamas-desktop, not the entire damn package. at some point it may be the case that pywebkitgtk gets its DOM bindings: pyjamas-desktop can then use that as a dependency. so, all is not lost. l. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603518] Review Request: pyip - Python assembling/disassembling of raw ip packets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603518 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Depends on||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i...@ianweller.org Alias||pyip Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2010-06-13 22:32:44 EDT --- I will review this package shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603514] Review Request: libmodman - A simple library for managing C++ modules (plug-ins)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603514 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Depends on||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i...@ianweller.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603521] Review Request: pynetsnmp - Python ctypes bindings for NET-SNMP with Twisted integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603521 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Depends on||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i...@ianweller.org Alias||pynetsnmp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603514] Review Request: libmodman - A simple library for managing C++ modules (plug-ins)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603514 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||libmodman -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591730] Review Request: pyjamas - A python to Javascript compiler, Widget set, Framework and Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591730 --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-06-13 23:59:20 EDT --- Excellent. Thanks for the info. :) Happy to adjust or tweak the fedora package to work better. Feel free to file bugs on it, or drop me email directly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600243] Review Request: libjpeg-turbo - MMX/SSE accelerated libjpeg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243 --- Comment #22 from Tom Lane t...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 00:01:00 EDT --- Well, nonetheless, you *are* going to get push-back if you remove the static library. I know because it was tried once already, and not that long ago. See bug #186060, bug #215537. Fedora is used for other things than just building itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581279] Review Request: erlang-ibrowse - Erlang HTTP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581279 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-06-14 00:23:57 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590832] Review Request: iapetal - A 2D space rescue game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590832 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-06-14 00:25:31 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596449] Review Request: NetworkManager-openswan - NetworkManager VPN plugin for Openswan (IPsec)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596449 --- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-06-14 00:44:07 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594744] Review Request: zint - A barcode generator and library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594744 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-06-14 00:42:48 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 599316] Review Request: input-pad - Input Pad
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599316 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-06-14 00:45:03 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). We aren't doing F-14 branches yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603311] Review Request: R-caTools - Tools: moving window statistics, gif, base64, roc auc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603311 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-06-14 00:47:48 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602597] Review Request: perl-Package-Stash - Routines for manipulating stashes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602597 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-06-14 00:47:01 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600637] Review Request: gnome-js-common - Common modules for GNOME JavaScript interpreters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600637 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-06-14 00:45:19 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-06-14 00:46:34 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). We aren't doing F-14 branches yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603366] Review Request: coan - re-review due to package rename from sunifdef
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603366 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-06-14 00:48:16 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603521] Review Request: pynetsnmp - Python ctypes bindings for NET-SNMP with Twisted integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603521 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercyp...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 00:53:10 EDT --- I think this package should be renamed to python-pynetsnmp. The namespace for this package is pynetsnmp rather than netsnmp, thus it'll much better to add python before module names. Most py* packages should keep py* as its package name because the namespace for those modules normally don't include py. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601160] Review Request: rubygem-rdiscount - Fast Implementation of Gruber's Markdown in C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601160 --- Comment #11 from Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de 2010-06-14 01:09:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rubygem-rdiscount Short Description: Fast Implementation of Gruber's Markdown in C Owners: gerd Branches: F-12 F-13 InitialCC: gerd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593851] Review Request: clide - Color and style highlighting program for text
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593851 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-06-14 00:42:13 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581279] Review Request: erlang-ibrowse - Erlang HTTP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581279 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-14 01:50:37 EDT --- erlang-ibrowse-1.6.0-0.3.20100601git07153bc.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-ibrowse-1.6.0-0.3.20100601git07153bc.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581279] Review Request: erlang-ibrowse - Erlang HTTP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581279 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-14 01:50:28 EDT --- erlang-ibrowse-1.6.0-0.3.20100601git07153bc.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-ibrowse-1.6.0-0.3.20100601git07153bc.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581279] Review Request: erlang-ibrowse - Erlang HTTP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581279 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-14 01:50:33 EDT --- erlang-ibrowse-1.6.0-0.3.20100601git07153bc.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-ibrowse-1.6.0-0.3.20100601git07153bc.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
