[Bug 563844] Update Zim to the upstream Python-based release
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||Zim-0.47-1.fc14 Resolution||RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(cw...@alumni.drew | |.edu) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518857] Review Request: django-extensions - django command line extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518857 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||INSUFFICIENT_DATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600238] Review Request: maven-dependency-plugin - Plugin to manipulate, copy and unpack local and remote artifacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600238 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 02:51:22 EDT --- Thanks. Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2248261 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603295] Review Request: guava - Guava (Google Common Libraries)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603295 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||socho...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|socho...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 03:08:54 EDT --- I will do the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578135] Review Request: patcher - Quick creation of patches against a project source tree
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578135 --- Comment #7 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org 2010-06-14 03:36:23 EDT --- I am, but I do not know what are the next steps, or if there is something I need to do ( since that's the first time I submit a package, I may have overlooked some part of the procedure ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601633] Review Request: sup - A console-based email client written in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601633 --- Comment #10 from Shreyank Gupta shreya...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 03:50:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) Some notes: * Naming - As this is based on sup gem, please name rpm as rubygem-sup anyway (because installed rpm can be used as sup gem). I am of the opinion, that since this package is not a ruby library, it need not be named as rubygem-sup. Also since this package is a application naming it sup rather than rubygem-sup makes more sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594744] Review Request: zint - A barcode generator and library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594744 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-14 03:58:40 EDT --- zint-2.3.2-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zint-2.3.2-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594744] Review Request: zint - A barcode generator and library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594744 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-14 03:58:35 EDT --- zint-2.3.2-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zint-2.3.2-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-14 04:17:06 EDT --- perl-IPC-Signal-1.00-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IPC-Signal-1.00-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563376] Revive from F11 branch: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563376 --- Comment #9 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 04:23:40 EDT --- New SRPM: https://dl-web.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.9-6.20100601svn.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603629] New: Review Request: cf-ofl-sorts-mill-goudy - Goudy Oldstyle and Italic fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cf-ofl-sorts-mill-goudy - Goudy Oldstyle and Italic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603629 Summary: Review Request: cf-ofl-sorts-mill-goudy - Goudy Oldstyle and Italic fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/cf-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/cf-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts-3.0-2.fc13.src.rpm Description: Goudy Oldstyle and Italic (based on ATF foundry type) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603631] New: Review Request: moyogo-molengo-fonts - A Latin typeface for documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moyogo-molengo-fonts - A Latin typeface for documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603631 Summary: Review Request: moyogo-molengo-fonts - A Latin typeface for documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/moyogo-molengo-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/moyogo-molengo-fonts-0.10-2.fc13.src.rpm Description: Molengo is a Latin typeface for documents. It is multilingual and has some features required by many minority languages such as non-spacing mark placement. The font is produced with Fontforge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603632] New: Review Request: typemade-josefinsansstd-light-fonts - This typeface was to made for geometric, elegant titling and kind of vintage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: typemade-josefinsansstd-light-fonts - This typeface was to made for geometric, elegant titling and kind of vintage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603632 Summary: Review Request: typemade-josefinsansstd-light-fonts - This typeface was to made for geometric, elegant titling and kind of vintage Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/typemade-josefinsansstd-light-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/typemade-josefinsansstd-light-fonts-1.000-2.fc13.src.rpm Description: The idea for creating this typeface was to make it geometric, elegant and kind of vintage, especially for titling. It is based on Rudolf Koch's Kabel (1927), Rudolf Wolf's Memphis (1930),Paul Renner's Futura (1927?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] New: Review Request: robofab -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: robofab - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634 Summary: Review Request: robofab - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/robofab.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/robofab-1.2.0-1.svn200.fc13.src.rpm Description: RoboFab is a Python library with objects that deal with data usually associated with fonts and type design. RoboFab reads and writes UFO font files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603628] New: Review Request: aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts - A latin font for the production of technical books and papers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts - A latin font for the production of technical books and papers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603628 Summary: Review Request: aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts - A latin font for the production of technical books and papers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts-0-0.2.20100523.fc13.src.rpm Description: A latin font for a quality typeface for the production of books and papers, particularly technical ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603630] New: Review Request: impallari-lobster-fonts - Hand written font with various ligatures for better connecting of letters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: impallari-lobster-fonts - Hand written font with various ligatures for better connecting of letters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603630 Summary: Review Request: impallari-lobster-fonts - Hand written font with various ligatures for better connecting of letters Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/impallari-lobster-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/impallari-lobster-fonts-1.3-2.fc13.src.rpm Description: Hand written font with various ligatures for better connecting of letters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603633] New: Review Request: scholarsfonts-cardo-fonts - This is designed for classicists, Biblical scholars, medievalists, linguists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: scholarsfonts-cardo-fonts - This is designed for classicists, Biblical scholars, medievalists, linguists https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603633 Summary: Review Request: scholarsfonts-cardo-fonts - This is designed for classicists, Biblical scholars, medievalists, linguists Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/scholarsfonts-cardo-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/scholarsfonts-cardo-fonts-0.099-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Cardo is a large Unicode font specifically designed for the needs of classicists, Biblical scholars, medievalists, and linguists. Since it may be used to prepare materials for publication, it also contains features that are required for high-quality typography, such as ligatures, text figures (also known as old style numerals), true small capitals and a variety of punctuation and space characters. It may also be used to document and discuss the features of Unicode that are applicable to the these disciplines, as we work to help colleagues understand the value (and limitations) of Unicode. This font has been revived in modern times under several names (Bembo, Aetna, Aldine 401). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] Review Request: robofab - reads and writes UFO font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: robofab - |Review Request: robofab - ||reads and writes UFO font ||files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603233] Review Request: zeromq - Software library for fast, message-based applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603233 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-14 04:26:24 EDT --- Sorry, Peter, didn't notice your bug... Are you interested in comaintaining? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603295] Review Request: guava - Guava (Google Common Libraries)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603295 --- Comment #2 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 04:32:43 EDT --- I planned to start official review immediately, but due to problems with this package noted below I will delay it until those issues are fixed. NEEDSWORK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. guava.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Guava guava.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US google's - Google's, goggle's, go ogle's guava.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US io - oi, Io, ii guava.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US javax - java, java x, Java guava.src: W: invalid-url Source0: guava-r05.tar.bz2 guava.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Guava guava.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US google's - Google's, goggle's, go ogle's guava.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US io - oi, Io, ii guava.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US javax - java, java x, Java guava.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/guava guava.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/java/guava-r05.jar *-05* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings. So let's go 1 by 1: - summary should normally not repeat name of package. So simplify it to something like Google Core Libraries for Java - Google's not google's - your symlink in /usr/share/java is completely wrong. You will have to play with it a bit. BIG FAT WARNING: I have noted this before in previous reviews (not sure if it was your package). When you do: svn export http://guava-libraries.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ guava-r05 You CAN NOT guarantee checked out sources will always be the same! In fact checked out sources are very different from sources you'd get by doing: svn export http://guava-libraries.googlecode.com/svn/tags/release05 guava-r05 And that you should do. Trunk is always changing, so you cannot make releases out of it without specifying at least revision number (if no tags exist). NEEDSWORK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Don't use: ln -s /usr/share/java/jsr-305.jar lib/jsr305.jar Instead use something like export CLASSPATH=$(build-classpath jsr-305) or if the build system really needs that jar file in lib/, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#build-jar-repository I'll do full official review after these problems have been fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602597] Review Request: perl-Package-Stash - Routines for manipulating stashes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602597 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-14 04:43:03 EDT --- perl-Package-Stash-0.03-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Package-Stash-0.03-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574627] Review request: sunpinyin - A statistical language model based Chinese input method
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574627 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||Notready -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574627] Review request: sunpinyin - A statistical language model based Chinese input method
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574627 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|Notready|NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602597] Review Request: perl-Package-Stash - Routines for manipulating stashes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602597 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-14 04:45:53 EDT --- perl-Package-Stash-0.03-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Package-Stash-0.03-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602597] Review Request: perl-Package-Stash - Routines for manipulating stashes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602597 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-14 04:45:48 EDT --- perl-Package-Stash-0.03-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Package-Stash-0.03-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603638] New: Review Request: defcon - A set of flexible objects for representing UFO data.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: defcon - A set of flexible objects for representing UFO data. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603638 Summary: Review Request: defcon - A set of flexible objects for representing UFO data. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/defcon.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/defcon-0.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: A set of flexible objects for representing UFO data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603641] New: Review Request: fontMath - A set of objects for performing math operations on font data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fontMath - A set of objects for performing math operations on font data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603641 Summary: Review Request: fontMath - A set of objects for performing math operations on font data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/fontMath.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/fontMath-0.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: A set of objects for performing math operations on font data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601633] Review Request: sup - A console-based email client written in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601633 --- Comment #12 from Shreyank Gupta shreya...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 04:47:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) We already have some other example. - For example rails is not scrictly ruby library But it still is a web framework. All rails applications have gem 'rails' as inside config/boot.rb - Also we have merb (I don't know well, maintained by Kent), and (I think) this is not ruby library I guess they will be merged into rails 3 - haml is also an application It is basically a library to parse views templates written in haml. But naming these packages as rubygem-foo anyway is preferred because we can track easily what packages are built from gem (i.e. it makes easier to maintain). If that is the concern could we package sup as rubygem-sup and provide a subpackage sup (something similar to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Packaging_for_Gem_and_non-Gem_use) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602597] Review Request: perl-Package-Stash - Routines for manipulating stashes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602597 --- Comment #9 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-06-14 04:47:42 EDT --- Built successfully on all branches, including dist-rawhide and dist-f14-perltest tags for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601633] Review Request: sup - A console-based email client written in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601633 --- Comment #13 from Shreyank Gupta shreya...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 04:48:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) If that is the concern could we package sup as rubygem-sup and provide a subpackage sup (something similar to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Packaging_for_Gem_and_non-Gem_use) Or maybe the other way round! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 --- Comment #54 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 04:49:19 EDT --- Suggestions from comment 37 implemented in sendmail-8.14.4-8.fc14. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] Review Request: robofab - reads and writes UFO font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n CC||i18n-b...@lists.fedoraproje ||ct.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603633] Review Request: scholarsfonts-cardo-fonts - This is designed for classicists, Biblical scholars, medievalists, linguists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603633 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n CC||i18n-b...@lists.fedoraproje ||ct.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603639] New: Review Request: ufo2fdk - A bridge between UFOs and the AFKDO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ufo2fdk - A bridge between UFOs and the AFKDO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603639 Summary: Review Request: ufo2fdk - A bridge between UFOs and the AFKDO Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/ufo2fdk.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/ufo2fdk-0.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: A bridge between UFOs and the AFKDO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603640] New: Review Request: compositor - A simple OpenType GSUB and GPOS engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: compositor - A simple OpenType GSUB and GPOS engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603640 Summary: Review Request: compositor - A simple OpenType GSUB and GPOS engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/compositor.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/compositor-0.2b-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: A simple OpenType GSUB and GPOS engine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603631] Review Request: moyogo-molengo-fonts - A Latin typeface for documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603631 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n CC||i18n-b...@lists.fedoraproje ||ct.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603638] Review Request: defcon - A set of flexible objects for representing UFO data.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603638 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n CC||i18n-b...@lists.fedoraproje ||ct.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603630] Review Request: impallari-lobster-fonts - Hand written font with various ligatures for better connecting of letters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603630 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n CC||i18n-b...@lists.fedoraproje ||ct.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603639] Review Request: ufo2fdk - A bridge between UFOs and the AFKDO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603639 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n CC||i18n-b...@lists.fedoraproje ||ct.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603629] Review Request: cf-ofl-sorts-mill-goudy - Goudy Oldstyle and Italic fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603629 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n CC||i18n-b...@lists.fedoraproje ||ct.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603628] Review Request: aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts - A latin font for the production of technical books and papers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603628 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n CC||i18n-b...@lists.fedoraproje ||ct.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603632] Review Request: typemade-josefinsansstd-light-fonts - This typeface was to made for geometric, elegant titling and kind of vintage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603632 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n CC||i18n-b...@lists.fedoraproje ||ct.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603640] Review Request: compositor - A simple OpenType GSUB and GPOS engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603640 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n CC||i18n-b...@lists.fedoraproje ||ct.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 599316] Review Request: input-pad - Input Pad
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599316 fujiwara tfuji...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #13 from fujiwara tfuji...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 04:58:40 EDT --- Integrated in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2248480 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603366] Review Request: coan - re-review due to package rename from sunifdef
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603366 Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 05:15:02 EDT --- Thanks Kevin. coan packages built for devel and F-13 branches, closing bz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602960] Review Request: maven-eclipse-plugin - Maven Eclipse Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602960
Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-06-14
05:20:08 EDT ---
Review:
OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. Output:
maven-eclipse-plugin.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency aqute-bndlib
This is not a lib package.
maven-eclipse-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US classpath
- class path, class-path, classmate
maven-eclipse-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation
maven-eclipse-plugin.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/maven/fragments/maven-eclipse-plugin
False positives.
OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc. There is no license file.
Please ask upstream to include one.
OK: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of
those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a
directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that
directory.
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
OK: Each package must consistently use macros.
OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application.
OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
It may be better to do
# Install necessary package to maven repository
mvn-jpp \
-e \
-Dmaven2.jpp.mode=true \
-Dmaven2.jpp.depmap.file=${MAVEN_DEPMAP} \
-Dmaven.repo.local=$MAVEN_REPO_LOCAL \
install:install-file \
-DgroupId=org.eclipse.core \
-DartifactId=resources \
-Dversion=3.5.2-v201004121342 \
-Dpackaging=jar \
-Dfile=/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.core.resources_3.5.2.201004121342.jar
in the %prep section.
Otherwise, package looks good.
This package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603640] Review Request: compositor - A simple OpenType GSUB and GPOS engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603640 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercyp...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 05:23:08 EDT --- It'll be better to rename this package to python-$NAME to match package naming guideline. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 505354] Review Request: php-captchaphp - PHP very user-friendly CAPTCHA solution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505354 --- Comment #8 from Patrick Monnerat p...@datasphere.ch 2010-06-14 05:24:38 EDT --- I thank you very much for the review, Spot: as ever, you are my savior :-) License: Public Domain or MIT Change applied: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/php-captchaphp.spec http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/php-captchaphp-2.2-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 599316] Review Request: input-pad - Input Pad
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599316 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-14 05:28:36 EDT --- input-pad-0.1.0.20100614-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/input-pad-0.1.0.20100614-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] Review Request: robofab - reads and writes UFO font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercyp...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 05:28:44 EDT --- This package should be renamed to python-robofab, the same reason with #603640 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563376] Revive from F11 branch: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563376 --- Comment #12 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 05:31:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) Okay. Rawhide build succeeded: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2248524 Now it is approved by cheeselee. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563376] Revive from F11 branch: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563376 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 05:30:58 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: pcmanx-gtk2 New Branches: F-12 F-13 Owners: supercyper -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602597] Review Request: perl-Package-Stash - Routines for manipulating stashes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602597 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-14 04:44:24 EDT --- perl-Package-Stash-0.03-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Package-Stash-0.03-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603640] Review Request: python-compositor - A simple OpenType GSUB and GPOS engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603640 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: compositor |Review Request: |- A simple OpenType GSUB|python-compositor - A |and GPOS engine |simple OpenType GSUB and ||GPOS engine --- Comment #2 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 05:42:28 EDT --- Following the python naming guidelines now. Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/python-compositor.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/python-compositor-0.2b-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] Review Request: robofab - reads and writes UFO font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||603640 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603640] Review Request: python-compositor - A simple OpenType GSUB and GPOS engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603640 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||603634 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #27 from Patrick Monnerat p...@datasphere.ch 2010-06-14 05:43:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: WebCalendar Short Description: Single/multi-user web-based calendar application Owners: monnerat Branches: F-12 F-13 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] Review Request: python-robofab - reads and writes UFO font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||603638 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] Review Request: python-robofab - reads and writes UFO font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: robofab - |Review Request: |reads and writes UFO font |python-robofab - reads and |files |writes UFO font files --- Comment #2 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 05:43:49 EDT --- Following python naming guidelines now Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/python-robofab.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/python-robofab-1.2.0-1.svn200.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] Review Request: python-robofab - reads and writes UFO font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||603639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] Review Request: python-robofab - reads and writes UFO font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||603641 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603639] Review Request: python-ufo2fdk - A bridge between UFOs and the AFKDO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603639 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||603634 Summary|Review Request: ufo2fdk - A |Review Request: |bridge between UFOs and the |python-ufo2fdk - A bridge |AFKDO |between UFOs and the AFKDO --- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 05:46:38 EDT --- Following python naming guidelines now. Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/python-ufo2fdk.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/python-ufo2fdk-0.1-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603641] Review Request: python-fontMath - A set of objects for performing math operations on font data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603641 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||603634 Summary|Review Request: fontMath - |Review Request: |A set of objects for|python-fontMath - A set of |performing math operations |objects for performing math |on font data|operations on font data --- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 05:47:50 EDT --- Following python naming guidelines. Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/python-fontMath.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/python-fontMath-0.2-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] Review Request: python-robofab - reads and writes UFO font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||603666 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603666] New: Review Request: python-defconAppKit - A collection of Vanilla objects for use in font editing applications.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-defconAppKit - A collection of Vanilla objects for use in font editing applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603666 Summary: Review Request: python-defconAppKit - A collection of Vanilla objects for use in font editing applications. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/python-defconAppKit.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/python-defconAppKit-0.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: A collection of Vanilla objects for use in font editing applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603666] Review Request: python-defconAppKit - A collection of Vanilla objects for use in font editing applications.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603666 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n CC||i18n-b...@lists.fedoraproje ||ct.org Depends on||603634 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600243] Review Request: libjpeg-turbo - MMX/SSE accelerated libjpeg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243 --- Comment #23 from Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 06:19:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) Well, nonetheless, you *are* going to get push-back if you remove the static library. I know because it was tried once already, and not that long ago. See bug #186060, bug #215537. Fedora is used for other things than just building itself. In my opinion it's long time since F7 (libjpeg-turbo will hit F14) so we can retest if someone still needs the static libjpeg. I would rather see no static libjpeg.a for now. It might be easily added in the future if someone requests it, libjpeg-turbo project uses libtool so I will drop the --disable-static configure flag in the specfile and add -static subpackage, it's pretty simple. If we package -static libjpeg now we won't be able to figure time when we can say noone uses the static libjpeg.a. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 580169] Review Request: loggerhead - Web viewer for the Bazaar version control system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580169 --- Comment #14 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2010-06-14 06:25:37 EDT --- Why is this ticket still on ON_QA? The package have been pushed to stable several weeks ago? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603638] Review Request: python-defcon - A set of flexible objects for representing UFO data.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603638 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||603634 Summary|Review Request: defcon - A |Review Request: |set of flexible objects for |python-defcon - A set of |representing UFO data. |flexible objects for ||representing UFO data. --- Comment #1 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 05:45:35 EDT --- Following python naming guidelines now. Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/python-defcon.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/python-defcon-0.1-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600243] Review Request: libjpeg-turbo - MMX/SSE accelerated libjpeg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243 --- Comment #24 from Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 06:39:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) Hi Adam, Add -static subpackage and more documents to mainpackage and -devel subpackage, I'll start to review this package. As I wrote in the comment #23 I don't think the -static package is needed now. I included the example.c documentation file in the devel subpackage and extended description a little, it should be sufficient. New spec + SRPM: http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo.spec http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo-0.0.93-6.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600243] Review Request: libjpeg-turbo - MMX/SSE accelerated libjpeg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243 --- Comment #25 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 06:51:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) (In reply to comment #18) Hi Adam, Add -static subpackage and more documents to mainpackage and -devel subpackage, I'll start to review this package. As I wrote in the comment #23 I don't think the -static package is needed now. I included the example.c documentation file in the devel subpackage and extended description a little, it should be sufficient. New spec + SRPM: http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo.spec http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo-0.0.93-6.fc14.src.rpm How about to ask this on -devel? I found that many core libraries in fedora provides static libs, e.g. glibc openssl zlib libpng. If we don't provide -static subpackage, we need to obsolete it in the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600243] Review Request: libjpeg-turbo - MMX/SSE accelerated libjpeg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243 --- Comment #26 from Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 07:29:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) How about to ask this on -devel? I found that many core libraries in fedora provides static libs, e.g. glibc openssl zlib libpng. Done. Check http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-June/137604.html. If we don't provide -static subpackage, we need to obsolete it in the main package. Right you are but it should be obsoleted in the -devel subpackage. New spec + SRPM: http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo.spec http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo-0.0.93-7.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601160] Review Request: rubygem-rdiscount - Fast Implementation of Gruber's Markdown in C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601160 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-06-14 08:38:46 EDT --- Please set fedora-cvs flag to ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602767] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MarkAsMethods - Mark overload code symbols as methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602767 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 08:42:53 EDT --- Both readme could stay in package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537983] Review Request: python-visual - 3D Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 ELMORABITY Mohamed pikachu.2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602767] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MarkAsMethods - Mark overload code symbols as methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602767 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 08:42:23 EDT --- OK rpmlint checks return: [ma...@caladan SRPMS]$ rpmlint perl-MooseX-MarkAsMethods-0.08-1.fc13.src.rpm perl-MooseX-MarkAsMethods.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US namespace - name space, name-space, names pace perl-MooseX-MarkAsMethods.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autoclean - auto clean, auto-clean, autoclave 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [ma...@caladan SRPMS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/perl-MooseX-MarkAsMethods-0.08-1.fc13.noarch.rpm perl-MooseX-MarkAsMethods.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US namespace - name space, name-space, names pace perl-MooseX-MarkAsMethods.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autoclean - auto clean, auto-clean, autoclave 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. OK package meets naming guidelines OK package meets packaging guidelines OK license (LGPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source OK spec file legible, in am. english OK source matches upstream OK package compiles on devel (x86) OK no missing BR OK no unnecessary BR OK no locales OK not relocatable OK owns all directories that it creates OK no duplicate files OK permissions ok OK %clean ok OK macro use consistent OK code, not content OK no need for -docs OK nothing in %doc affects runtime OK no need for .desktop file New version 0.09 is available. Please update, the latest version is fixing version of Moose in requirements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537983] Review Request: python-visual - 3D Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 ELMORABITY Mohamed pikachu.2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #29 from ELMORABITY Mohamed pikachu.2...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 08:39:57 EDT --- Just a few words about the license: it seems some files are under the MIT license too. Maybe you could add it to the License field. Moreover, in the license.txt file, the part relative to the Polygon module is quite worrying (typically nonfree)... But I didn't find this module in the sources, I suppose it was removed from previous versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591730] Review Request: pyjamas - A python to Javascript compiler, Widget set, Framework and Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591730 --- Comment #23 from luke kenneth casson leighton l...@lkcl.net 2010-06-14 08:44:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) Excellent. Thanks for the info. :) no problem. Happy to adjust or tweak the fedora package to work better. cool. i have to do a 0.7p1 or 0.7.1 soon, there's a couple of niggling bugs in 0.7 but the actual packaging itself? it looks solid to me. Feel free to file bugs on it, or drop me email directly. willdo kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590832] Review Request: iapetal - A 2D space rescue game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590832 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-14 08:47:14 EDT --- iapetal-1.0-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iapetal-1.0-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590832] Review Request: iapetal - A 2D space rescue game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590832 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-14 08:47:08 EDT --- iapetal-1.0-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iapetal-1.0-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601633] Review Request: sup - A console-based email client written in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601633
--- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-06-14
08:50:54 EDT ---
I think just Provides: sup = %{version}-%{release} is the simplest.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603521] Review Request: pynetsnmp - Python ctypes bindings for NET-SNMP with Twisted integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603521 --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2010-06-14 09:14:43 EDT --- I disagree. python-py* is redundant. The packaging guidelines also state: If the upstream source has py (or Py) in its name, you can use that name for the package. Users can run an rpm -ql to see what the namespace of the package is after the fact. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601160] Review Request: rubygem-rdiscount - Fast Implementation of Gruber's Markdown in C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601160 Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de 2010-06-14 09:30:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rubygem-rdiscount Short Description: Fast Implementation of Gruber's Markdown in C Owners: gerd Branches: F-12 F-13 InitialCC: gerd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601633] Review Request: rubygem-sup - A console-based email client written in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601633 Shreyank Gupta shreya...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: sup - A |Review Request: rubygem-sup |console-based email client |- A console-based email |written in ruby |client written in ruby -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601633] Review Request: rubygem-sup - A console-based email client written in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601633 --- Comment #15 from Shreyank Gupta shreya...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 10:02:41 EDT --- Alright then. UPDATED: - Spec URL: http://shreyankg.fedorapeople.org/packaging/sup/rubygem-sup.spec SRPM URL: http://shreyankg.fedorapeople.org/packaging/sup/rubygem-sup-0.10.2-4.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602574] Review Request: patchelf - a utility for patching ELF binaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602574
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de
--- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2010-06-14
10:37:51 EDT ---
Hi Jeremy,
here are some initial comments:
- according to file README, the license is GPLv3+, not GPLv3 only
- to simplify things, I suggest to replace the rm and rmdir line with
rm -rf %{buildroot}/usr/share/doc/
- remove %doc from %doc %{_mandir}/man1/patchelf.1*
- don't mix tabs and spaces for indentation
- The tarball contains a couple of tests. It's probably a good idea to run them
(with make check in a %check section).
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-13-i386/result/*.rpm
patchelf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US executables -
executable, executable s, executrices
patchelf.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US executables -
executable, executable s, executrices
patchelf.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
patchelf.src:10: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10)
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
The missing buildroot tag can be ignored if you plan to maintain this package
for Fedora only. Otherwise, you should add one and also clean the buildroot in
%install.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602791] Review Request: xrootd - Extended ROOT file server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602791
--- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2010-06-14
11:03:31 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Summary and comments
1) The
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libXrdPosix.so.0.0.0
_e...@glibc_2.2.5
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libXrdClient.so.0.0.0
e...@glibc_2.2.5
xrootd-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libXrdRootd.so.0.0.0
_e...@glibc_2.2.5
can you open a bug upstream.
I have now sent a mail with this issue to xrootd-b...@slac.stanford.edu, which
is indicated as the preferred way to report bugs in xrootd on
http://xrootd.slac.stanford.edu/Bug_Report.htm - it probably ends up in an
issue tracker somewhere - but I didn't get any reply yet, so I can not give a
reference. This could be due to grey listing.
2) Source1: xrootd-manpages.tar.gz
Can you ellaberate more on where this tar ball comes from so some one else
could
create it.
Added some comments to the spec file.
3) Man pages are LGPL not BSD.
Added LGPLv2+ to the License tag
4) Presumably pthreads-win32 directory can be deleted, it's GPL so to be sure
it's not being used
delete it.
done
5) src/XrdSecssl/libsslGridSite/* is ASL2.0/BSD but also is really just a copy
of gridsite
source code as you know now packaged, can you use the ready packaged one.
Looking harder I see this may not actually be used, delete it to be sure.
done
6) There is no LICENSE file, can you request upstream adds one.
done - to the same e-mail as above.
7) I see you made some comments on the shared library .so and the module .so.
Something to think about, do you want to library version the shared libs?
Can the actual modules(or plugins) go in /usr/lib64/xrootd/modules with as
necessary
symlinks to the versioned sos in %{_libdir} . All depends on how hard it is to
do.
The plugin handling in xrootd is not centralized to one place in the code, but
dlopen is called in very many places. I think this would be quite a lot of
work.
8) The description of the package is a bit terse, can you add what xrootd can
actually be used for.
I have expanded the package description.
9) You may want to increase the BR for java to bring in an openjdk rather than
just GCJ. My mock build did not build a .jar and only built a .so.
I can not reproduce this. The jar built fine for me even with java-1.4.2-gcj on
RHEL 4.
Steve.
New version:
Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/xrootd.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/xrootd-20100315-2.fc12.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601633] Review Request: rubygem-sup - A console-based email client written in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601633 Shreyank Gupta shreya...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Shreyank Gupta shreya...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 11:30:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rubygem-sup Short Description: A console-based email client written in ruby Owners: shreyankg Branches: F-13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601633] Review Request: rubygem-sup - A console-based email client written in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601633 --- Comment #18 from Shreyank Gupta shreya...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 11:42:19 EDT --- UPDATED: - Spec URL: http://shreyankg.fedorapeople.org/packaging/sup/rubygem-sup.spec SRPM URL: http://shreyankg.fedorapeople.org/packaging/sup/rubygem-sup-0.10.2-5.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602767] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MarkAsMethods - Mark overload code symbols as methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602767 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 11:51:20 EDT --- Both spelling errors are false; The words are literals (perl package name). New version 0.09 does not provide fix. It still does not updates required version in the module itself. Upstream noticed. Do you mind reviewing 0.08? Both versions are almost identical. The 0.08 spec includes both REAMDE files yet. Marcela, could accept this package and set review flag to +? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 599097] Review Request: libgexiv2 - Gexiv2 is a GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599097
--- Comment #17 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 11:55:01
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
hey,
Thank you for reviewing this :)
Here's the formal review. The package looks almost fine to me, except one
remaining aspect:
- replace %{_includedir}/gexiv2/* with %{_includedir}/gexiv2/
to make the package own the directory too (and not only the header files)
..
...
[X] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
- directory %{_includedir}/gexiv2/ must be owned by the -devel package
Fixed it.
new srpm :
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/libgexiv2/libgexiv2-0.0.91-2.fc13.src.rpm
new spec
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/libgexiv2/libgexiv2.spec
rest of mock logs at
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/libgexiv2/
regards,
Ankur
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603269] Review Request: rubygem-plist - All-purpose Property List manipulation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603269
--- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-06-14
12:21:10 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=423896)
-- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=423896)
patch to make rake test succeed
Some notes:
* ruby(abi) dependency
- ruby module packages must have R: ruby(abi) = 1.8.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines
* %prep, %build section:
- From rpmlint
$ rpmlint -I 'no-%prep-section'
no-%prep-section:
The spec file does not contain a %prep section. Even if some packages don't
directly need it, section markers may be overridden in rpm's configuration to
provide additional under the hood functionality. Add the section, even if
empty.
i.e. (in the future) rpmbuild may do some additional needed procedure
before the contents written in %prep or %build begins.
So even if currently %prep or %build can be empty, please add them.
* %check
- Doing rake test needs the attached patch.
( I guess that (although I have not checked it in detail)
rdoc/task is in ruby 1.9. On Fedora rdoctask is in rake gem anyway )
* %doc in -doc subpackage
- I think %doc attribute in -doc subpackage is redundant because
rpm's name already shows that this is for documentation.
! macros in comments
--
#export PATH=$PATH:%{buildroot}%{geminstdir}/lib/plist
#export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$PATH:%{buildroot}%{geminstdir}/lib
--
- These comment lines include macros and rpmlint warns for these:
--
rubygem-plist.src:51: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
rubygem-plist.src:51: W: macro-in-comment %{geminstdir}
--
The reason rpmlint warns for macro-in-comment is that
during rpmbuild macros are expanded anyway, even in comment lines.
For this package this is safe, however if a defined macro contains
several lines, this can cause some strange behavior.
- For example, with #%configure, configure script is executed
against expectation
So it is always recommended to excape macros in comment lines
using %% instead of %.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 580169] Review Request: loggerhead - Web viewer for the Bazaar version control system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580169 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 12:24:50 EDT --- Looks like bodhi didn't close it... Closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 599097] Review Request: libgexiv2 - Gexiv2 is a GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599097
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #18 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2010-06-14
12:49:14 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Thank you for reviewing this :)
You're welcome.
[X] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
- directory %{_includedir}/gexiv2/ must be owned by the -devel package
Fixed it.
OK, the package is ready now, and we can finish here. :)
Package APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601408] Review Request: techtalk-pse - Presentation software designed for technical people
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601408 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2010-06-14 12:51:31 EDT --- Files imported in CVS and are building now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603846] New: Review Request: libpeas - Plug-ins implementation convenience library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libpeas - Plug-ins implementation convenience library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603846 Summary: Review Request: libpeas - Plug-ins implementation convenience library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bnoc...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/libpeas/libpeas.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/libpeas/libpeas-0.5.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: libpeas is a convenience library making adding plug-ins support to GTK+ and glib-based applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 599097] Review Request: libgexiv2 - Gexiv2 is a GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599097 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2010-06-14 13:06:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libgexiv2 Short Description: ligexiv2 is a GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-12 F-13 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603846] Review Request: libpeas - Plug-ins implementation convenience library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603846 --- Comment #1 from Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 2010-06-14 13:06:52 EDT --- Updated to call ldconfig: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/libpeas/libpeas-0.5.0-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581913] Review Request: python-simplegeneric - Simple generic functions (similar to Python's own len(), pickle.dump(), etc.)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581913 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-14 13:10:48 EDT --- python-simplegeneric-0.6-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581913] Review Request: python-simplegeneric - Simple generic functions (similar to Python's own len(), pickle.dump(), etc.)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581913 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-simplegeneric-0.6-2. ||fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
