[Bug 608216] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf - an image loader library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608216 --- Comment #7 from Chen Lei 2010-06-26 23:49:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > gdk-pixbuf is still in fedora and "maintained" by me. :) > > So, either this will need a different name, or we will need to (finally) kill > off the stuff using the old version, or somehow get them to use this new > version. > > If I have done my query right, it's required by: > > justmoon-0.3.3-6.fc12.src.rpm > soundtracker-0.6.8-8.fc12.src.rpm > xosd-2.2.14-13.fc12.src.rpm > > I kept it around for xosd, but I guess I don't care if we nuke it at this > point. > > Thoughts? It looks like gdk-pixbuf is only required by xmms-xosd subpackage instead of required by the whole xosd? Now Fedora 14 have gnome1/gnome2/gnome3 stuffs, I wonder if it's safe to retire some long obsoletes packages which have better modern alternatives(e.g. no updates/activities in upstream for more than 7 years)? FYI, Debian removed the whole gtk1.2 stack from repo in Apr,2009. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520441 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608216] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf - an image loader library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608216 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|supercyp...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Chen Lei 2010-06-26 23:25:13 EDT --- Okay, this package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597888] Review Request: spek - free acoustic spectrum analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597888 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kojevnikov 2010-06-26 21:45:34 EDT --- In the meantime Spek 0.5 has been released: http://spek.googlecode.com/files/spek-0.5.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542767] Review Request: ghemical - Molecular mechanics and quantum mechanics frontend for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542767 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 21:35:35 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542767] Review Request: ghemical - Molecular mechanics and quantum mechanics frontend for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542767 Carl Byington changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Carl Byington 2010-06-26 21:26:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ghemical Short Description: Molecular mechanics and quantum mechanics front end for GNOME Owners: carllibpst Branches: F-12 F-13 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608216] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf - an image loader library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608216 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2010-06-26 20:47:21 EDT --- http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/gdk-pixbuf2.spec http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/gdk-pixbuf2-2.21.4-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608216] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf - an image loader library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608216 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen 2010-06-26 20:43:48 EDT --- I'll rename this one to gdk-pixbuf2, no problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608216] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf - an image loader library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608216 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@tummy.com --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-06-26 20:38:18 EDT --- gdk-pixbuf is still in fedora and "maintained" by me. :) So, either this will need a different name, or we will need to (finally) kill off the stuff using the old version, or somehow get them to use this new version. If I have done my query right, it's required by: justmoon-0.3.3-6.fc12.src.rpm soundtracker-0.6.8-8.fc12.src.rpm xosd-2.2.14-13.fc12.src.rpm I kept it around for xosd, but I guess I don't care if we nuke it at this point. Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 --- Comment #15 from Sascha Thomas Spreitzer 2010-06-26 20:16:57 EDT --- Please read this carefully and take action! Your vote is needed within CACert! http://spreitzer.name/set-the-cacert-root-certificates-free -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608216] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf - an image loader library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608216 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen 2010-06-26 18:47:23 EDT --- Thanks, I've incorporated your suggestions in this revision: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/gdk-pixbuf.spec http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/gdk-pixbuf-2.21.4-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562467] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562467 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 17:47:40 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542990] Review Request: root - Numerical data analysis framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542990 --- Comment #21 from Steve Traylen 2010-06-26 17:48:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=427144) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=427144) rpmlint output for root-5.26.00b-3 Putting the rpmlint output as an attachment for the review as it's humongous. I'll summarise it for the review. Also, scratch build okay: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2274688 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603904] Review Request: xautomation - Tools to automate tasks in X, even detecting on screen images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603904 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 17:30:06 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529254] Review Request: i3 - Improved tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529254 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 17:22:55 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529256] Review Request: i3status - Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529256 --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 17:23:25 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529255] Review Request: i3lock - A slightly improved version of slock
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529255 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 17:23:12 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 582369] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-I3 - Communicate with the i3 window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582369 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 17:24:19 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 17:21:25 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583142] Review Request: i3-ipc - Inter-process communication with i3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583142 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 17:24:45 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529253] Review Request: dmenu - Generic menu for X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529253 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 17:22:27 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 486528] Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - Perl HTML parser and checker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486528 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 17:18:10 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608332] New: Review Request: rootplot - Plots ROOT data with matplotlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rootplot - Plots ROOT data with matplotlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608332 Summary: Review Request: rootplot - Plots ROOT data with matplotlib Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.tray...@cern.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/rootplot/rootplot.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/rootplot/rootplot-1.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: ROOT is a powerful data analysis tool within the particle physics community, and the primary lens through which we see our data. The framework includes quite a bit of graphical capabilities, but producing high-quality graphics output was not the first priority in designing its capabilities or its interface. It becomes useful, then, to consider using an outside library focused on graphics for producing final plots. The pyROOT interface to ROOT makes it easy to have ROOT objects interact with other python modules. The goal of rootplot is to enable easy plotting of ROOT histograms using the full-featured and mature matplotlib library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542990] Review Request: root - Numerical data analysis framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542990 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||608332 Bug 542990 depends on bug 602791, which changed state. Bug 602791 Summary: Review Request: xrootd - Extended ROOT file server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602791 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608332] Review Request: rootplot - Plots ROOT data with matplotlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608332 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||542990 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608326] Review Request: gtkmm30 - C++ interface for the GTK+ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608326 Kalev Lember changed: What|Removed |Added CC||debarshi@gmail.com Depends on||608141 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608141] Review Request: atkmm - C++ interface for the ATK library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608141 Kalev Lember changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||608326 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608326] New: Review Request: gtkmm30 - C++ interface for the GTK+ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gtkmm30 - C++ interface for the GTK+ library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608326 Summary: Review Request: gtkmm30 - C++ interface for the GTK+ library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ka...@smartlink.ee QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/gtkmm30.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/gtkmm30-2.90.3.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: gtkmm provides a C++ interface to the GTK+ GUI library. gtkmm30 wraps GTK+ 3. Highlights include typesafe callbacks, widgets extensible via inheritance, and a comprehensive set of widget classes that can be freely combined to quickly create complex user interfaces. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 481410] Review Request: perl-Mail-POP3Client - Perl 5 module to talk to a POP3 (RFC1939) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481410 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 16:35:58 EDT --- corseipu is listed as not contributing to EPEL. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542767] Review Request: ghemical - Molecular mechanics and quantum mechanics frontend for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542767 Christian Krause changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Christian Krause 2010-06-26 16:15:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > http://www.five-ten-sg.com/ghemical.spec > http://www.five-ten-sg.com/ghemical-2.99.2-13.fc12.src.rpm > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2264194 I have reviewed the new package and all issues reported in the full review in comment #4 were resolved. Thanks! -> APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607778] Review Request: xnoise-plugins-core - Core plugins for xnoise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607778
--- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2010-06-26 16:17:05
EDT ---
$ sha1sum xnoise-plugins-core-0.1.6.tar.gz
8eb208d9d3cc263e36904216d17520bc00b89a67 xnoise-plugins-core-0.1.6.tar.gz
* "BuildRequires: intltool" is missing
* MediaWatcher plugin crashes:
1) start xnoise
2) open Preferences > Plugins
3) enable MediaWatcher
4) disable MediaWatcher
5) enable MediaWatcher
6) GLib-GObject warnings on stderr + segfault
* LastfmCovers plugin crashes on exit:
1) start xnoise
2) enable LastfmCovers plugin
3) quit
4) segfault
* Notifications plugin prints " ... "
* /usr/lib64/xnoise/*.la files are not needed
* xnoise-plugins-core.x86_64: E: incorrect-locale-subdir
/usr/share/locale/default/LC_MESSAGES/xnoise-plugins-core.mo
* %{_libdir}/xnoise ownership : currently owned by the -plugins-core package,
which is optional, however. Would separate xnoise plugin packages need to own
%{_libdir}/xnoise or do you think it would be better to make the base "xnoise"
package own that directory?
* xnoise-plugins-core-devel : What's the purpose of this package? The current
%description can't be correct. ;-)
* Rest is fine.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608319] Review Request: memaker - An avatar creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608319 --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha 2010-06-26 16:00:46 EDT --- hey, There are some issues already: It's a python module, but doesn't use any setuptools etc. I've manually installed *all* files. Therefore, there are no egg files at the moment (I couldn't figure out how to generate them manually). regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608319] New: Review Request: memaker - An avatar creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: memaker - An avatar creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608319 Summary: Review Request: memaker - An avatar creator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/memaker/memaker.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/memaker/memaker-1.5-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: MeMaker gives users a wide variety of images that, when placed together, create an avatar. This avatar is intended to represent the way that this person is in some way. The goal of the project is to have enough images that anyone can create an image that they feel would closely represent them without having to use a photo in the image itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595638] Review Request: qwit- Qt4 cross-platform client for Twitter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595638 --- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember 2010-06-26 15:40:10 EDT --- The Debian package installs a man page. Please include it in this package and submit it for upstream inclusion too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608206] Review Request: zn_poly - C library for polynomial arithmetic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608206
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-06-26 15:35:26
EDT ---
rpmlint output:
zn_poly.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US zn -> Zn, z, n
zn_poly.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nZ -> NZ, Zn, n
zn_poly.src:48: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
zn_poly.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US zn -> Zn, z, n
zn_poly.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nZ -> NZ, Zn, n
zn_poly-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) zn -> Zn, z, n
zn_poly-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US zn -> Zn, z,
n
zn_poly-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) zn -> Zn, z, n
zn_poly-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US zn -> Zn, z, n
zn_poly-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nZ -> NZ, Zn, n
zn_poly-devel.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libzn_poly.so
zn_poly-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
zn_poly-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) zn -> Zn, z, n
zn_poly-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US zn -> Zn, z, n
zn_poly-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nZ -> NZ, Zn, n
zn_poly-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 15 warnings.
- You can fix the configure-without-libdir warning by replacing
./configure --cflags="%{optflags} -fPIC" --prefix=%{_prefix} \
--gmp-prefix=%{_prefix} \
--ntl-prefix=%{_prefix} \
--flint-prefix=%{_prefix}
with
python makemakefile.py \
--cflags="%{optflags} -fPIC" --prefix=%{_prefix} \
--gmp-prefix=%{_prefix} --ntl-prefix=%{_prefix} \
--flint-prefix=%{_prefix} > makefile
- Fix the no-ldconfig-symlink either by patching makemakefile.py so that
libzn_poly.so becomes a symlink, or by replacing the installed duplicate with a
symlink at the end of %install.
MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
- Specifying the multiple license scenario is OK, although you could shorten it
to "GPLv2 or GPLv3", since that's what comes out at the end.
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
0eeaae2524addf558de94bfbc914d22e zn_poly-0.9.tar.gz
0eeaae2524addf558de94bfbc914d22e ../SOURCES/zn_poly-0.9.tar.gz
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK
- Preserve time stamps in %install by adding -p (or -a) to the cp argument.
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
- I recommend using a trailing / for directories in %files to make it clearer,
i.e.
%{_includedir}/zn_poly/
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. NEEDSWORK
- Don't include README, it only contains instructions for compilation, which
aren't relevant to the binary rpm.
- Maybe include doc/REFERENCES ?
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK
- There's nothing wrong with shipping static libraries (in -static), but
normally it isn't done in Fedora.
- If you want, you can just not ship the static library by either not
installing it in %install, or by deleting it at the end of %install.
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned
[Bug 503250] Review Request: ghc-hinotify - Haskell binding to INotify
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 --- Comment #11 from Ben Boeckel 2010-06-26 15:35:28 EDT --- Spec: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-hinotify/ghc-hinotify.spec SRPM: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-hinotify/ghc-hinotify-0.3.1-1.fc13.src.rpm boe...@bronto-burt % rpmlint */ghc-hinotify*.rpm ghc-hinotify.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-hinotify.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/hinotify-0.3.1/libHShinotify-0.3.1-ghc6.12.1.so ghc-hinotify.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/hinotify-0.3.1/libHShinotify-0.3.1-ghc6.12.1.so ghc-hinotify-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-hinotify-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-hinotify-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-hinotify-devel ghc-hinotify-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-hinotify-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/hinotify-0.3.1/libHShinotify-0.3.1_p.a ghc-hinotify.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-hinotify.src: W: strange-permission hinotify-0.3.1.tar.gz 0640L ghc-hinotify.src: W: strange-permission ghc-hinotify.spec 0640L 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings. Not sure what to do about the unstripped object. Strange perms are from my 027 umask. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595638] Review Request: qwit- Qt4 cross-platform client for Twitter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595638
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||ka...@smartlink.ee
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ka...@smartlink.ee
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember 2010-06-26 15:32:00 EDT
---
Taking for review.
> Summary: Qt4 cross-platform client for Twitter
I think it's better to avoid mentioning the toolkit (Qt4) in summary, but
rather concentrate on what the client does. It's really not interesting for
non-technical users. Also, I wouldn't say "cross-platform" either, as it
basically just says that we can run that program. I'd suggest to use the
summary from Debian package [1] instead:
"Lightweight desktop client for Twitter microblogging service"
[1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/qwit
Why aren't you using the cmake-based build system instead of qmake? The
CMakeLists.txt file looks pretty sophisticated and among other things installs
translation files automatically, which are currently missing from the rpm.
Instead of installing the icon directly to %{_datadir}/icons/*.png, I think
it'd be better to install it to %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/*.png as the
latter supports icon themes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602598] Review Request: perl-Proc-WaitStat - Interpret and act on wait() status values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602598 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Runge 2010-06-26 14:57:33 EDT --- Thank you for your review. After fixing build requirements (BuildRequires: perl(IPC::Signal)) make test succeeds: mru...@herodot Proc-WaitStat-1.00]$ make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/waitstat.t .. ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=20, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 0.04 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.11 CPU) Result: PASS The following version corrects this issue SPEC: http://matthias-runge.de/fedora/perl-Proc-WaitStat.spec SRPM: http://matthias-runge.de/fedora/perl-Proc-WaitStat-1.00-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608141] Review Request: atkmm - C++ interface for the ATK library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608141 --- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember 2010-06-26 14:06:57 EDT --- * Sat Jun 26 2010 Kalev Lember - 2.21.1-2 - added missing Conflicts: gtkmm24-devel to -devel subpackage - calculate two-digit download directory from three-digit package version Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/atkmm.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/atkmm-2.21.1-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #37 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 13:46:05 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 12:49:42 EDT --- That went slightly awry; sorry. I've fixed it up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 12:16:43 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 461307] Review Request: perl-Software-License Packages that provide templated software licenses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461307 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 11:53:56 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 461307] Review Request: perl-Software-License Packages that provide templated software licenses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461307 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602737] Review Request: sugar-abacus - A simple abacus activity for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602737 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(pbrobin...@gmail. | |com)| --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2010-06-26 10:33:09 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/sugar-abacus-14-1.fc13.src.rpm I think I've fixed it all. I'm not sure if there's a direct static download URL for ASLO so I've added the current one. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2274313 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593800] Review Request: python-keyring - keyring module for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800 --- Comment #16 from Ratnadeep Debnath 2010-06-26 10:11:23 EDT --- Felix Schwarz: I got a bit busy with some other stuff, that's why I couldn't work on it for a while. But I am interested in packaging python-keyring. I'm having a look at the spec file updated by you. Will update soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606288] Review Request: bfast - Blat-like Fast Accurate Search Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606288 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-26 09:05:46 EDT --- bfast-0.6.4d-5.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bfast-0.6.4d-5.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606288] Review Request: bfast - Blat-like Fast Accurate Search Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606288 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-26 09:04:38 EDT --- bfast-0.6.4d-5.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bfast-0.6.4d-5.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 --- Comment #14 from Sascha Thomas Spreitzer 2010-06-26 08:33:52 EDT --- @Matthias; Is it OK with you to close this bug? I want to open a seperate one and take care on a future CACert root certificates package. I am a CACert member and I am working on a "Policy on Root Certificates Licensing" to license the Root Certificates under/via the CC-BY-ND. This will enable the distribution of the certificates. I think it makes sense if I take maintainership of an upcoming Fedora package. :) freedom regards, Sascha -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606513] Review Request: scert - scert is a CC-BY-ND derivative os CACerts CA certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606513 Sascha Thomas Spreitzer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Sascha Thomas Spreitzer 2010-06-26 07:47:40 EDT --- "Policy on Root Certificates" is in progress to license root certificates directly under CC-BY-ND. Thus, this package is obsolete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606666] Review Request: sselp - Prints X selection to standard out
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|cassmod...@fedoraproject.or |pikachu.2...@gmail.com |g | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603904] Review Request: xautomation - Tools to automate tasks in X, even detecting on screen images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603904 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589866] Review Request: darktable - Utility to organize and develop raw images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589866 --- Comment #8 from Edouard Bourguignon 2010-06-26 07:30:01 EDT --- Sorry, I was on vacation. The author told me to use the sources from their git repository. I will try that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607075] Review Request: perl-Test-utf8 - Handy utf8 tests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607075 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-26 07:00:06 EDT --- perl-Test-utf8-0.02-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-utf8-0.02-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607081] Review Request: perl-Data-Taxi - Taint-aware, XML-ish data serialization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607081 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2010-06-26 07:00:13 EDT --- spec fixed and imported to rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607078] Review Request: perl-File-Type-WebImages - Determine web image file types using magic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607078 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-26 07:02:00 EDT --- perl-File-Type-WebImages-1.01-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Type-WebImages-1.01-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607081] Review Request: perl-Data-Taxi - Taint-aware, XML-ish data serialization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607081 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-26 07:01:12 EDT --- perl-Data-Taxi-0.95-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-Taxi-0.95-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607075] Review Request: perl-Test-utf8 - Handy utf8 tests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607075 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-26 07:00:00 EDT --- perl-Test-utf8-0.02-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-utf8-0.02-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607078] Review Request: perl-File-Type-WebImages - Determine web image file types using magic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607078 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-26 07:02:07 EDT --- perl-File-Type-WebImages-1.01-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Type-WebImages-1.01-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607078] Review Request: perl-File-Type-WebImages - Determine web image file types using magic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607078 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2010-06-26 07:01:28 EDT --- spec fixed and imported to rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607081] Review Request: perl-Data-Taxi - Taint-aware, XML-ish data serialization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607081 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-26 07:01:20 EDT --- perl-Data-Taxi-0.95-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-Taxi-0.95-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603904] Review Request: xautomation - Tools to automate tasks in X, even detecting on screen images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603904 MERCIER Jonathan changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bioinfornat...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607075] Review Request: perl-Test-utf8 - Handy utf8 tests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607075 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2010-06-26 06:57:51 EDT --- spec fixed and imported in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606064] Review Request: libfc14audiodecoder - C wrapper library for Future Composer audio decoding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606064 Michael Schwendt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2010-06-26 06:40:53 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=179874 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606759] Review Request: nvi - 4.4BSD re-implementation of vi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606759 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-26 06:26:36 EDT --- nvi-1.81.6-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nvi-1.81.6-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592645] Review Request: mkgmap - Convert OpenStreetMap data for Garmin GPSes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645 --- Comment #3 from Bruce Cowan 2010-06-26 06:22:24 EDT --- I'll get to that probably tomorrow, I've been on holiday the last week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593800] Review Request: python-keyring - keyring module for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800 --- Comment #15 from Felix Schwarz 2010-06-26 05:57:14 EDT --- Ratnadeep Debnath: Are you still interested in packaging python-keyring? I'm feeling a bit bad here just to hijack this review. Ratnadeep, please tell me if you're still interested - I'll step back then. If you don't have time right now, I'd like to take over. However as I needed this package for my private workflow, I modified the spec file quite a bit so that it complies to Fedora's guidelines, see http://www.felix-schwarz.name/files/misc/2010/python-keyring-0.2-1.fc13.2.src.rpm I think it is better than the previously linked versions. There is one pylint error which I can't fix: python-keyring.x86_64: E: no-binary As far as I know, it is not possible to have a noarch main package with arch-specific subpackages. Therefore the main package is not 'noarch' even though it does not contain binary files. Can we ignore this? I don't understand pylint's invalid url warning. I suspect it tries to do a HEAD request which the web site does not support. The url is perfectly fine though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606714] Review Request: eekboard - A Virtual Keyboard for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606714 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-06-26 05:14:42 EDT --- Some notes: * BuildRoot - BuildRoot tag is no longer used (even if rpmlint may complain if you remove this) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag ! By the way for this package %clean is also unneeded because this package won't build on F-12 (c.f.: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2273814 : higher gtk seems needed ) and %clean is not needed for F-13+: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean * BR - Please try to remove redundant BRs - "glib2-devel" is always required by "gtk2-devel" - You probably need gobject-introspection"-devel" (not just gobject-introspection) ! Note that gobject-introspection-devel is required by clutter-devel (and so clutter-gtk-devel) * build issues - The spec file contains: - 62 # Prevent the upstream configure script from using clutter-gtk-0.90, 63 # which is not available in Fedora yet. 64 export CLUTTER_GTK_CFLAGS=`pkg-config clutter-gtk-0.10 --cflags` 65 export CLUTTER_GTK_LIBS=`pkg-config clutter-gtk-0.10 --libs` - Why is this needed while configure.ac contains the below? - 72PKG_CHECK_MODULES([CLUTTER_GTK], [clutter-gtk-0.90], 73 [enable_clutter_gtk=yes]) 74if test x$enable_clutter_gtk = xno; then 75 PKG_CHECK_MODULES([CLUTTER_GTK], [clutter-gtk-0.10], 76[enable_clutter_gtk=yes]) 77fi - - Your srpm fails to build on F-13 as: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2273819 Note that current dist-f13-build pango is 1.28.0-1.fc13 and introspection is enabled from 1.28.0-2 * Desktop file verification - 518 /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/eekboard-0.0.3-2.fc14.i386/usr/share/applications/eekboard.desktop: error: (will be fatal in the future): value "GNOME" in key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" requires another category to be present among the following categories: GTK - - Please consider to fix this. * Documents - "AUTHORS COPYING README" should be moved to -libs, because eekboard depends on -libs and not the opposite. * Directory ownership issue - Please take care of directory ownership issue -- # rpm -qf /usr/include/eek-0.1/ /usr/include/eek-0.1/eek/ /usr/share/vala/ /usr/share/vala/vapi/ file /usr/include/eek-0.1 is not owned by any package file /usr/include/eek-0.1/eek is not owned by any package file /usr/share/vala is not owned by any package file /usr/share/vala/vapi is not owned by any package -- ! Functionality - By the way (with using rawhide) when I try to * launch uxterm * launch eekboard from uxterm * choose 'ヘルプ' -> '情報', then choose '閉じる' on the popup'ed window Then eekboard freezes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DEFERRED| AssignedTo|loupgaroubl...@gmail.com|nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2010-06-26 04:45:26 EDT --- http://hackage.haskell.org/package/bluetile-0.4.1 was released so reopening in case anyone wants to pick this up again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608216] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf - an image loader library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608216
--- Comment #1 from Chen Lei 2010-06-26 04:27:56 EDT ---
formal review here:
+:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing
MUST Items:
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [FIXME?: covers this
list and more]
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
<>f10bdc4496e7577c7d8b9384aedcb56f
[+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one supported architecture.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro.
[+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just
symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in
%post and %postun.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is
described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be
removed in the spec.
[+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
SHOULD Items:
[+] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[+] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[+] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file
instead of the file itself.
Spec file is well-organized, only some trivial issue:
1.%dir %{_libdir}/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/*.so ->
%{_libdir}/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/*.so
2.
Add conflicts field to spec
main package:
Conflicts:gtk2 <= 2.21.2
-devel
Conflicts:gtk2-devel <= 2.21.2
3.It'll better to use %{_mandir}/man1/gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders-2.0.1*
instead of %{_mandir}/man1/gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders-2.0.1.gz to let rpm build
on other distributions(e.g. mandriva uses xz to compress man pages)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607342] Review Request: python-markupsafe - A safe escaping library for markup languages like HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607342 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 04:06:04 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607078] Review Request: perl-File-Type-WebImages - Determine web image file types using magic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607078 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 04:05:02 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607081] Review Request: perl-Data-Taxi - Taint-aware, XML-ish data serialization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607081 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 04:05:20 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606759] Review Request: nvi - 4.4BSD re-implementation of vi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606759 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 04:04:31 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606666] Review Request: sselp - Prints X selection to standard out
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 04:04:14 EDT --- Please remember to assign the ticket to the person doing the review. CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606064] Review Request: libfc14audiodecoder - C wrapper library for Future Composer audio decoding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606064 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 04:02:46 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607777] Review Request: xnoise - Tracklist-centric Media Player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 04:06:17 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607224] Review Request: eclipse-fedorapackager - Eclipse plug-in which helps to interact with Fedora infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607224 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 04:05:47 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607075] Review Request: perl-Test-utf8 - Handy utf8 tests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607075 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 04:04:47 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 528290] Review Request: yapet - Curses based password encryption tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528290 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 04:00:36 EDT --- According to pkgdb, this already has an EL-6 branch and you're the owner. A CVS checkout confirms this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606288] Review Request: bfast - Blat-like Fast Accurate Search Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606288 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 04:03:11 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603904] Review Request: xautomation - Tools to automate tasks in X, even detecting on screen images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603904 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 04:02:10 EDT --- This ticket is not assigned to anyone; it should be assigned to the reviewer. Please fix and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] Review Request: python-robofab - reads and writes UFO font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 03:58:23 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608216] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf - an image loader library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608216 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||supercyp...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600243] Review Request: libjpeg-turbo - MMX/SSE accelerated libjpeg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243 --- Comment #45 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 03:56:28 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601908] Review Request: perl-App-SVN-Bisect - Binary search through svn revisions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601908 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 03:56:54 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 --- Comment #20 from Dan Nicholson 2010-06-26 03:33:08 EDT --- I don't have access to EL, but this is a completely benign module. Seems fine to me as long as the dependencies are available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 454208] Review Request: florence - Florence is an extensible scalable on-screen virtual keyboard for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454208 --- Comment #27 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 03:27:48 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 --- Comment #37 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 03:20:07 EDT --- Please forgive me; now that I have better tools I see you are comaintainer of the package in Fedora, which is fine. CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 248338] Review Request: gnome-applet-netspeed - GNOME applet that shows traffic on a network device
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248338 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-26 03:00:49 EDT --- Certainly answering my question would help, but I suppose I can assume the answer is yes. You should generally provide such information when you make such a CVS request, so that we know what you're trying to do. I'm not part of rel-eng and have no way of knowing you filed a ticket to unblock the package. I have created the F-13 branch, unretired the package in pkgdb and set you as the owner of the devel branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
