[Bug 608141] Review Request: atkmm - C++ interface for the ATK library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608141 --- Comment #6 from Chen Lei 2010-06-28 02:43:42 EDT --- Since atkmm-devel depends on atk-devel, I think you can drop Requres: gtk-doc safely, because atk-devel already has html docs in /usr/share/gtk-doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592074] Review Request: R-SparseM - Sparse linear algebra
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592074
--- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2010-06-28 02:37:09
EDT ---
* Latest version packaged
62ffeff7a9739019b3c42e3eab31f1a89a4d102d SparseM_0.85.tar.gz
62ffeff7a9739019b3c42e3eab31f1a89a4d102d
~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/SparseM_0.85.tar.gz
* sha1sum are equals
* All required Requires are present
* All required BuildRequires are present
* The macro %check is present
* There is 1 %dir
%dir is OK
* There is 5 %doc
* More element than expected in %doc
LICENSE ChangeLog
* The rpm installed in _libdir
* The rpm uses %{_libdir} and is arch
* The rpm seems to have the required element in %install
* Build properly under 2.6.33.5-124.fc13.x86_64
* rpmlint:
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Scratch build on koji for target f14
* Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2276476
0 free 0 open 3 done 0 failed
2276476 build (dist-f14, R-SparseM-0.85-1.fc12.src.rpm) completed
successfully
- Build produces quite a number of warnings
* %check is present
* All checks are passed successfully
* License GPLv2+ is compatible with Fedora
! The license file mention different licenses (and provides a incorrect link)
I will ask for information regarding the license before approve this package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602598] Review Request: perl-Proc-WaitStat - Interpret and act on wait() status values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602598 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Matthias Runge 2010-06-28 02:37:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Proc-WaitStat Short Description: Interpret and act on wait() status values Owners: mrunge Branches: F-13 devel EL-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602598] Review Request: perl-Proc-WaitStat - Interpret and act on wait() status values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602598 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Runge 2010-06-28 02:35:49 EDT --- Thank you, great! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608141] Review Request: atkmm - C++ interface for the ATK library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608141
--- Comment #5 from Chen Lei 2010-06-28 02:37:28 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> If you are talking about gdk-pixbuf2, then I think that package is actually
> doing a wrong thing. Probably just an oversight, not something deliberate.
>
> gdk-pixbuf2 currently has:
> %files devel
> %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/*
>
> ... and no dependency on gtk-doc.
>
> What matters for RPM directory handling is that every single directory has to
> be owned by something. If we put files in %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/*, then
> %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/ and %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/ need to be either owned by
> this package or something that it depends on, otherwise RPM will leave
> directories behind when it removes this package.
>
Yep, those minor packaging bugs are very common, I can't see any consistency on
treating those directory ownership issue. Even very core packages also have
those issues.
> In that FPC thread people were suggesting adding these directories to either
> gnome-filesystem, filesystem, gtk-doc-filesystem, or making every package
> co-own these directories. Until any of these *filesystem packages are
> introduced, we have two options:
>
> 1) depend on gtk-doc
> 2) co-own both directories.
>
> I think lets leave the gtk-doc dep as it is right now and wait for FPC
> decision. I'll keep an eye on the discussion and will update the package
> accordingly.
The problem is those html files are irrelevant to gtk-doc, they are used by
devhelp or firefox. Personally, I think adding irrelevant dependencies is also
a packaging bug. So I suggest using 2) co-own both directories before FPC's
decision.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591415] Review Request: R-timeDate - Rmetrics - chronological and calendarical objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591415 --- Comment #6 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2010-06-28 02:15:10 EDT --- Still nothing ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591737] Review Request: R-ROC - Utilities for ROC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591737 --- Comment #4 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2010-06-28 02:15:24 EDT --- Any news Sandro ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603629] Review Request: cf-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts - Goudy Oldstyle and Italic fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603629 Parag changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |cf-sorts-mill-goudy - Goudy |cf-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts - |Oldstyle and Italic fonts |Goudy Oldstyle and Italic ||fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603311] Review Request: R-caTools - Tools: moving window statistics, gif, base64, roc auc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603311 --- Comment #9 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2010-06-28 02:14:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Is their any active provenpackgers in R SIG? Spot is the R maintainer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603629] Review Request: cf-sorts-mill-goudy - Goudy Oldstyle and Italic fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603629 Parag changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |cf-ofl-sorts-mill-goudy - |cf-sorts-mill-goudy - Goudy |Goudy Oldstyle and Italic |Oldstyle and Italic fonts |fonts | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603632] Review Request: typemade-josefinsansstd-light-fonts - This typeface was to made for geometric, elegant titling and kind of vintage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603632 --- Comment #7 from Parag 2010-06-28 02:10:21 EDT --- Upstream of this font replied me as == Hallo! You can ignore that EULA, I've changed the license to SIL Open Font License, 1.1, you can view it here, http://code.google.com/webfonts/family?family=Josefin+Sans+Std+Light I'll change it on my site ASAP. Cheers! == Can I use upstream font source then or wait till upstream release new source with updates license? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608141] Review Request: atkmm - C++ interface for the ATK library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608141
--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember 2010-06-28 02:04:02 EDT
---
If you are talking about gdk-pixbuf2, then I think that package is actually
doing a wrong thing. Probably just an oversight, not something deliberate.
gdk-pixbuf2 currently has:
%files devel
%{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/*
... and no dependency on gtk-doc.
What matters for RPM directory handling is that every single directory has to
be owned by something. If we put files in %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/*, then
%{_datadir}/gtk-doc/ and %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/ need to be either owned by
this package or something that it depends on, otherwise RPM will leave
directories behind when it removes this package.
In that FPC thread people were suggesting adding these directories to either
gnome-filesystem, filesystem, gtk-doc-filesystem, or making every package
co-own these directories. Until any of these *filesystem packages are
introduced, we have two options:
1) depend on gtk-doc
2) co-own both directories.
I think lets leave the gtk-doc dep as it is right now and wait for FPC
decision. I'll keep an eye on the discussion and will update the package
accordingly.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604500] Review Request: ibus-input-pad - Input Pad for IBus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604500 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604500] Review Request: ibus-input-pad - Input Pad for IBus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604500 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2010-06-28 01:55:42 EDT --- Thanks for this! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606714] Review Request: eekboard - A Virtual Keyboard for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606714 --- Comment #5 from Daiki Ueno 2010-06-28 01:33:16 EDT --- Thanks. Mostly fixed: Spec URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/eekboard/eekboard.spec SRPM URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/eekboard/eekboard-0.0.3-3.fc13.src.rpm - on CLUTTER_GTK_CFLAGS and CLUTTER_GTK_LIBS setting the upstream configure.ac is wrong (since it does not specify ACTION-IF-NOT-FOUND clause of PKG_CHECK_MODULES, configure aborts if clutter-gtk-0.90 is not found). I'll fix this in the next release. - on F-13 build failure related to pango introspection Pango*.gir is included in gir-repository-devel, so I added it to BR. - on /usr/share/vala/ ownership Added vala to eekboard-devel requirements. - freeze on the About dialog Couldn't reproduce it on F-13, but I'll try it on rawhide. Anyway, additional information would be much appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 599715] Review Request: python26-eventlet - Highly concurrent networking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599715 Rakesh Pandit changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|shamar...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608216] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf2 - an image loader library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608216 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-28 00:20:29 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571993] Review Request: non-sequencer - A powerful, real-time, pattern-based MIDI sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571993 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2010-06-28 00:16:01 EDT --- Hi, I'll review this package but there are two important issues that need to be fixed first: 1- The build needs to be verbose. We want to see what flags are passed to the compiler. Currently the compiler invocations are silent because of the lines that start with @ in the Makefile. We need to patch or sed these out. I am also not sure whether removing the whole "ifeq ($(USE_DEBUG),yes)" part from the Makefile is right. This also removes -DNDEBUG, and other flags which might be needed by the source, which I didn't check. Simply appending the optflags at the end should be sufficient. Something like sed -i 's|DNDEBUG|DNDEBUG $(CXXFLAGS)|' Makefile Let me know if I am missing something. 2- Since this is a desktop application, we need a .desktop file, an icon and the scriptlets, as usual. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608405] Review Request: perl-Config-GitLike - Git-compatible config file parsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608405 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608405] Review Request: perl-Config-GitLike - Git-compatible config file parsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608405 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-27 23:37:46 EDT --- perl-Config-GitLike-1.04-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Config-GitLike-1.04-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608141] Review Request: atkmm - C++ interface for the ATK library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608141 --- Comment #3 from Chen Lei 2010-06-27 23:35:02 EDT --- The Spec file is well-organized, only Requires: gtk-doc is controversial. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604169 Recently, I noticed mclasen dropped this dependency in new review request, so I suggest you also drop Requires:gtk-doc before FPC's final decision on this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608141] Review Request: atkmm - C++ interface for the ATK library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608141 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|supercyp...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608141] Review Request: atkmm - C++ interface for the ATK library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608141 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercyp...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608509] Review Request: subvertpy - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608509 --- Comment #2 from Chen Lei 2010-06-27 23:15:37 EDT --- s/those/though -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608509] Review Request: subvertpy - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608509 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercyp...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Chen Lei 2010-06-27 23:10:10 EDT --- Some suggustions: 1.name subvertpy -> python-subvertpy I'll better to use python before module namespace, those in some special case py can be omitted. 2.Group: Development/Languages -> Group: Development/Libraries See http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/SUSE_Package_Conventions/RPM_Groups -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596593] Review Request: ibus-table-chinese - Chinese tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2010-06-27 22:08:02 EDT --- Would it be better to subpackage some of the tables? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607342] Review Request: python-markupsafe - A safe escaping library for markup languages like HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607342 Kyle VanderBeek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566403] Review Request: dnsmap - Passive DNS network mapper a.k.a. subdomains bruteforcer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566403 --- Comment #11 from Michal Ambroz 2010-06-27 21:00:53 EDT --- Ping. Looking forward to test the nem package. Michal Ambroz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 --- Comment #16 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-06-27 20:32:00 EDT --- Just noting that CC-BY-ND is not a Free Creative Commons license. This begs the question of whether the CACert root certificates are content or code. I could probably make a persuasive argument that they are content, thus, they would only need to be freely redistributable without restriction (and CC-BY-ND would meet that requirement), but you'd need to get FESCo to sign off on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 605423] Review Request: python-dulwich - A python implementation of the Git file formats and protocols
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605423 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||608512 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608512] Review Request: python-anyvc - Python library to access different version control system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608512 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||605423 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608512] Review Request: python-anyvc - Python library to access different version control system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608512 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||608509 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608509] Review Request: subvertpy - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608509 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||608512 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608512] Review Request: python-anyvc - Python library to access different version control system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608512 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||python-anyvc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608509] Review Request: subvertpy - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608509 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||subvertpy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608512] New: Review Request: python-anyvc - Python library to access different version control system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-anyvc - Python library to access different version control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608512 Summary: Review Request: python-anyvc - Python library to access different version control system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fab...@bernewireless.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-anyvc.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-anyvc-0.3.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Project URL: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/anyvc Description: Anyvc is an abstraction library for different kind of version control systems. Although primarily a library, there is a command line tool (vc) to use with it. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2276263 rpmlint output: [...@laptop011 SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-anyvc-0.3.1-1.fc13.src.rpm python-anyvc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vc -> VC, cc, vv python-anyvc.src:56: W: macro-in-comment %check 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [...@laptop011 noarch]$ rpmlint python-anyvc-0.3.1-1.fc13.noarch.rpm python-anyvc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vc -> VC, cc, vv 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 605423] Review Request: python-dulwich - A python implementation of the Git file formats and protocols
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605423 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||python-dulwich -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608509] New: Review Request: subvertpy - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: subvertpy - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608509 Summary: Review Request: subvertpy - Python bindings for Subversion Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fab...@bernewireless.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/subvertpy.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/subvertpy-0.7.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Project URL: http://samba.org/~jelmer/subvertpy/ Description: Alternative Python bindings for Subversion, split out from bzr-svn. The goal is to have complete, portable and "Pythonic" Python bindings. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2276232 rpmlint output: [...@laptop011 SRPMS]$ rpmlint subvertpy-0.7.2-1.fc13.src.rpm subvertpy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bzr -> br, bar, brr subvertpy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US svn -> avn, sen, sin 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [...@laptop011 x86_64]$ rpmlint subvertpy* subvertpy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bzr -> br, bar, brr subvertpy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US svn -> avn, sen, sin subvertpy.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary subvertpy-fast-export 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573910] Review Request: dcmtk - Offis DICOM Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573910 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Loening 2010-06-27 18:04:59 EDT --- Hi Mario, I put a new version of the SPEC file and associated RPM's up at: http://www.stanford.edu/~loening/fedora/ Debuginfo now is built correctly. The only remaining issue... I think... is the lack of soname's with the generated library. Do you know if this is a real blocker? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573910] Review Request: dcmtk - Offis DICOM Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573910 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Loening 2010-06-27 18:01:16 EDT --- Hi Per, I ended up incorporating almost everything with the following exceptions: 1) did not include the change to tlslayer.cc as I already included a patch based on the dcmtk 3.5.5 development branch 2) did not include the pdcmtk spec file 3) did not include the changes to configuration files - getting things placed in the right positions in the directory tree is handled by the spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542416] Review Request: yagtd - Yet Another Getting Things Done
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542416 --- Comment #8 from Fabian 2010-06-27 17:49:02 EDT --- I added a doc package new koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2276206 new Spec file http://underscores.fedorapeople.org/yagtd.spec new srpm http://underscores.fedorapeople.org/yagtd-0.3.3-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592645] Review Request: mkgmap - Convert OpenStreetMap data for Garmin GPSes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645 --- Comment #4 from Bruce Cowan 2010-06-27 17:42:03 EDT --- I've updated the package, spec at http://bruce89.fedorapeople.org/mkgmap.spec; srpm at http://bruce89.fedorapeople.org/mkgmap-0-0.2.1653svn.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527549] Review Request: osm2go - A simple openstreetmap editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549 --- Comment #19 from Fabian Affolter 2010-06-27 17:39:36 EDT --- Can you please tell provide a link to the *maemo2.tar.gz source? It seams that upstream changed the location of the source tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606421] Review Request: quickfix - Open Source FIX Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606421 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi Summary|Review Request: quickfix - |Review Request: quickfix - |pull new version from |Open Source FIX Engine |upstream and build | |additional subpackages | --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-06-27 17:29:06 EDT --- Corrected bug summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608216] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf2 - an image loader library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608216 --- Comment #10 from Matthias Clasen 2010-06-27 16:12:24 EDT --- gdk-pixbuf2, please. gdk-pixbuf already exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608216] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf2 - an image loader library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608216 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: gdk-pixbuf |Review Request: gdk-pixbuf2 |- an image loader library |- an image loader library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607778] Review Request: xnoise-plugins-core - Core plugins for xnoise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607778 Bug 607778 depends on bug 60, which changed state. Bug 60 Summary: Review Request: xnoise - Tracklist-centric Media Player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607777] Review Request: xnoise - Tracklist-centric Media Player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560240] Review Request: libxls - Library for parsing Excel (XLS) files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560240 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Alias|libxls | --- Comment #11 from Chen Lei 2010-06-27 15:04:36 EDT --- Closed now, libxls is buggy, latest qtiplot 0.9.8 don't require it anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603311] Review Request: R-caTools - Tools: moving window statistics, gif, base64, roc auc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603311 --- Comment #8 from Chen Lei 2010-06-27 14:50:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I actually asked once and got refused for valid reasons. The policy is changed, now you just need 3 positive votes from existed sponsors to become a provenpackager. Is their any active provenpackgers in R SIG? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607355] Review Request: perl-Directory-Queue - Object oriented interface to a directory based queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607355 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-27 13:52:49 EDT --- perl-Directory-Queue-0.5-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Directory-Queue-0.5-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607355] Review Request: perl-Directory-Queue - Object oriented interface to a directory based queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607355 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-27 13:52:59 EDT --- perl-Directory-Queue-0.5-3.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Directory-Queue-0.5-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607355] Review Request: perl-Directory-Queue - Object oriented interface to a directory based queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607355 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-27 13:52:44 EDT --- perl-Directory-Queue-0.5-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Directory-Queue-0.5-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607355] Review Request: perl-Directory-Queue - Object oriented interface to a directory based queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607355 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-27 13:52:54 EDT --- perl-Directory-Queue-0.5-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Directory-Queue-0.5-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603311] Review Request: R-caTools - Tools: moving window statistics, gif, base64, roc auc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603311 --- Comment #7 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2010-06-27 13:37:00 EDT --- I actually asked once and got refused for valid reasons. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608206] Review Request: zn_poly - C library for polynomial arithmetic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608206
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-06-27 13:23:04
EDT ---
Very well,
APPROVED
PS. The soname = %{version} looks a bit funny. Maybe the library still is under
heavy development; the soname changing with updates might cause troubles with
other packages later on.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608470] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Script-Run - Test scripts with Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Script-Run - Test scripts with Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608470 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Script-Run - Test scripts with Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jfe...@free.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jfenal.free.fr/rpm/perl-Test-Script-Run.spec SRPM URL: http://jfenal.free.fr/rpm/perl-Test-Script-Run-0.04-1.f13.src.rpm Description: The Test::Script::Run perl module exports some subs to help test and run scripts in your distribution's bin/ directory, if the script path is not absolute. FE-NEEDSPONSOR This is my first package for Fedora, and I'm looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608405] Review Request: perl-Config-GitLike - Git-compatible config file parsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608405 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-27 12:55:39 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607878] Review Request: perl-XML-TreePP - Pure Perl implementation for parsing/writing XML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607878 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-27 12:53:06 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608216] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf - an image loader library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608216 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-27 12:55:23 EDT --- The bug summary says "gdk-pixbuf" but the CVS request says "gdk-pixbuf2". Please verify that the CVS request is correct. (We will always ask if they don't match in order to help prevent typos.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607876] Review Request: perl-Net-IMAP-Simple - Simple IMAP account handling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607876 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-27 12:52:47 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607355] Review Request: perl-Directory-Queue - Object oriented interface to a directory based queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607355 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-27 12:52:26 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542767] Review Request: ghemical - Molecular mechanics and quantum mechanics frontend for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542767 --- Comment #13 from Carl Byington 2010-06-27 12:24:46 EDT --- cd fedora/ghemical/F-12 make build /usr/bin/koji build dist-f12-updates-candidate 'cvs://cvs.fedoraproject.org/cvs/pkgs?rpms/ghemical/F-12#ghemical-2_99_2-13_fc12' timeout: (110, 'Operation timed out.') make: *** [build] Error 1 I have not been able to get koji to do the build. This is running on a F12 workstation with all the latest updates. curl --verbose --cert ~/.fedora.cert https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/ * Certificate is signed by an untrusted issuer: 'e=ad...@fedoraproject.org,CN=Fedora Project CA,OU=Fedora Project CA,O=Fedora Project,L=Raleigh,ST=North Carolina,C=US' * NSS error -8172 * Closing connection #0 * Peer certificate cannot be authenticated with known CA certificates curl: (60) Peer certificate cannot be authenticated with known CA certificates More details here: http://curl.haxx.se/docs/sslcerts.html Did earlier versions of koji not care about the server certificate, or has that certificate changed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603311] Review Request: R-caTools - Tools: moving window statistics, gif, base64, roc auc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603311 --- Comment #6 from Chen Lei 2010-06-27 12:16:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > hm I can't build it since R-bitops is still in updates-testing. > I have added a 'works for me' on koji, let's see if the maintainer reacts. Hi Pierre-YvesChibon, Why not request for a membership in provenpackager? Things will be easier if you can commit all R-related packages. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Provenpackager_policy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607355] Review Request: perl-Directory-Queue - Object oriented interface to a directory based queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607355 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2010-06-27 12:08:20 EDT --- Thanks for the review. If only all reviews were as quick as this. :-) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Directory-Queue Short Description: Object oriented interface to a directory based Owners: stevetraylen Branches: F-12 F-13 EL-4 EL-5 EL-6 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608447] New: Review Request: perl-Data-Serializer - Modules that serialize data structures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Serializer - Modules that serialize data structures Alias: perl-Data-Serializer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608447 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Serializer - Modules that serialize data structures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-Serializer/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Data-Serializer.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Data-Serializer-0.49-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Provides a unified interface to the various serializing modules currently available. Adds the functionality of both compression and encryption. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2275764 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603311] Review Request: R-caTools - Tools: moving window statistics, gif, base64, roc auc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603311 --- Comment #5 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2010-06-27 11:00:28 EDT --- hm I can't build it since R-bitops is still in updates-testing. I have added a 'works for me' on koji, let's see if the maintainer reacts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600682] Review Request: R-GenomicFeatures - A transient package to store various Genomic Features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600682 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-27 10:56:25 EDT --- R-GenomicFeatures-0.0.9-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-GenomicFeatures-0.0.9-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600682] Review Request: R-GenomicFeatures - A transient package to store various Genomic Features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600682 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-27 10:56:19 EDT --- R-GenomicFeatures-0.0.9-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-GenomicFeatures-0.0.9-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608405] Review Request: perl-Config-GitLike - Git-compatible config file parsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608405 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608405] Review Request: perl-Config-GitLike - Git-compatible config file parsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608405 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2010-06-27 10:51:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Config-GitLike Short Description: Git-compatible config file parsing Owners: iarnell Branches: F-13 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608216] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf - an image loader library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608216 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Matthias Clasen 2010-06-27 10:39:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gdk-pixbuf2 Short Description: An image loading library Owners: mclasen Branches: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608420] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Regression - Test library that can generate outputs and compare against them
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Regression - Test library that can generate outputs and compare against them https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608420 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Regression - Test library that can generate outputs and compare against them Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Test-Regression/perl-Test-Regression.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Test-Regression/perl-Test-Regression-0.05-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Using the various Test:: modules you can compare the output of a function against what you expect. However if the output is complex and changes from version to version, maintenance of the expected output could be costly. This module allows one to use the test code to generate the expected output, so that if the differences with model output are expected, one can easily refresh the model output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608421] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Without-Module - Test fallback behaviour in absence of modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Without-Module - Test fallback behaviour in absence of modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608421 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Without-Module - Test fallback behaviour in absence of modules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Test-Without-Module/perl-Test-Without-Module.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Test-Without-Module/perl-Test-Without-Module-0.17-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This module allows you to deliberately hide modules from a program even though they are installed. This is mostly useful for testing modules that have a fallback when a certain dependency module is not installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608419] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-FastCGI - For using CGI::Application under FastCGI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-FastCGI - For using CGI::Application under FastCGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608419 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-FastCGI - For using CGI::Application under FastCGI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-FastCGI/perl-CGI-Application-FastCGI.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-FastCGI/perl-CGI-Application-FastCGI-0.02-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Inherit this module instead of CGI::Application if you want to run your cgi programs based on CGI::Application under FastCGI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542416] Review Request: yagtd - Yet Another Getting Things Done
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542416 --- Comment #7 from Fabian 2010-06-27 09:15:27 EDT --- koji scratch build https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2274854 Spec file http://underscores.fedorapeople.org/yagtd.spec SRPM http://underscores.fedorapeople.org/yagtd-0.3.3-1.fc13.src.rpm Thanks for your reply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603481] Review Request: freerdp - remote desktop protocol client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603481 --- Comment #2 from Felix Möller 2010-06-27 08:47:43 EDT --- Still works great. ;) btw, I just let rpmlint ran over the resulting RPMs and got the following. freerdp-devel.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unversioned -> reconversion, bioconversion, interconversion freerdp-devel.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libfreerdp -> liberticide, subfreezing freerdp-devel.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libfreerdpchanman freerdp-devel.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libfreerdpkbd freerdp-devel.i386: W: no-documentation freerdp-libs.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libfreerdp -> liberticide, subfreezing freerdp-libs.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libfreerdpchanman freerdp-libs.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libfreerdpkbd freerdp-libs.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugins -> plug ins, plug-ins, plugging freerdp-libs.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libfreerdpchanman.so.0.0.0 freerdp-libs.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libfreerdpkbd.so.0.0.0 freerdp-libs.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libfreerdp.so.0.0.0 freerdp-libs.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libfreerdp.so.0.0.0 e...@glibc_2.0 freerdp-libs.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libfreerdp.so.0.0.0 exit@@GLIBC_2.0 freerdp-plugins-standard.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/freerdp/rdpdr.so freerdp-plugins-standard.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/freerdp/rdpsnd.so freerdp-plugins-standard.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/freerdp/cliprdr.so freerdp-plugins-standard.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/freerdp/printer.so freerdp-plugins-standard.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/freerdp/disk.so freerdp-plugins-standard.i386: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 20 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608405] Review Request: perl-Config-GitLike - Git-compatible config file parsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608405
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman
2010-06-27 08:41:02 EDT ---
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2275679
[x] Rpmlint output: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPL+ or Artistic
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
d307ae3fafd12aedba1033e7f7498a9c Config-GitLike-1.04.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[-] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: rawhide.x86_64
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2275679
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[x] %check is present and the tests pass
All tests successful.
Files=2, Tests=144, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.09 usr 0.03 sys + 0.53 cusr 0.21
csys = 0.86 CPU)
Result: PASS
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607877] Review Request: perl-XML-FeedPP - Parse/write/merge/edit RSS/RDF/Atom syndication feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607877 --- Comment #4 from Mark Chappell 2010-06-27 08:29:22 EDT --- Ah, sorry that was XML-Feed not XML-FeedPP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603481] Review Request: freerdp - remote desktop protocol client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603481 Felix Möller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fe...@derklecks.de --- Comment #1 from Felix Möller 2010-06-27 08:19:18 EDT --- great to see this package. I have just compiled it and it works great. This solves _alot_ of rdesktop bugs nobody cares about currently in Red Hat bugzilla... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608405] Review Request: perl-Config-GitLike - Git-compatible config file parsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608405 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||emmanuel.sey...@club-intern ||et.fr AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|emmanuel.sey...@club-intern ||et.fr Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607878] Review Request: perl-XML-TreePP - Pure Perl implementation for parsing/writing XML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607878 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-06-27 07:58:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-XML-TreePP Short Description: Pure Perl implementation for parsing/writing XML documents Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 EL-6 F-12 F-13 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607877] Review Request: perl-XML-FeedPP - Parse/write/merge/edit RSS/RDF/Atom syndication feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607877 --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-06-27 07:59:47 EDT --- I cannot find 0.42 on cpan.org, where did you find 0.42? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602598] Review Request: perl-Proc-WaitStat - Interpret and act on wait() status values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602598 Mark Chappell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mark Chappell 2010-06-27 07:57:30 EDT --- Looks good, package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607876] Review Request: perl-Net-IMAP-Simple - Simple IMAP account handling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607876 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-06-27 07:55:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Net-IMAP-Simple Short Description: Simple IMAP account handling Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 EL-6 F-12 F-13 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604659] Review Request: perl-Test-EOL - Check the correct line endings in your project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604659
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman
2010-06-27 07:44:09 EDT ---
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2275645
[x] Rpmlint output:
perl-Test-EOL.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US whitespace ->
white space, white-space, whites pace
perl-Test-EOL.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US whitespace -> white
space, white-space, whites pace
perl-Test-EOL.src: E: unknown-key GPG#b56a8bac
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPL+ or Artistic
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
b3b4453d0caed2954a93585924ab15f2 Test-EOL-0.9.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[-] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: rawhide.x86_64
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2275645
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[x] %check is present and the tests pass
All tests successful.
Files=6, Tests=27, 3 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.03 sys + 1.21 cusr 0.19
csys = 1.49 CPU)
Result: PASS
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608206] Review Request: zn_poly - C library for polynomial arithmetic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608206
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Spura 2010-06-27
07:45:46 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I'm not sure I agree with
> cp -pv include/*.h %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/zn_poly/src/
>
> If flint assumes a nonstandard location for the headers, then it should be
> fixed.
Ok, reverted in:
Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/zn_poly.spec
SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/zn_poly-0.9-4.fc13.src.rpm
Will do the flint fix with the update in bug #608199.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607877] Review Request: perl-XML-FeedPP - Parse/write/merge/edit RSS/RDF/Atom syndication feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607877 Mark Chappell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Mark Chappell 2010-06-27 07:37:55 EDT --- Note: 0.42 appears to be available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607878] Review Request: perl-XML-TreePP - Pure Perl implementation for parsing/writing XML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607878 Mark Chappell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607878] Review Request: perl-XML-TreePP - Pure Perl implementation for parsing/writing XML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607878 Mark Chappell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mark Chappell 2010-06-27 07:36:21 EDT --- As with Net-IMAP-Simple, the Source0 URL appears to be duff. However you're using the CPAN tarball so I'll approve the package package Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607875] Review Request: perl-Net-IMAP-Simple-SSL - Simple IMAP account handling with SSL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607875 Mark Chappell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607876] Review Request: perl-Net-IMAP-Simple - Simple IMAP account handling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607876 Mark Chappell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mark Chappell 2010-06-27 07:34:20 EDT --- Given Coro::EV hasn't been packaged and it's only for tests I think we ignore that one. Spotted one other niggle, which should be fixed before initial import, the Source0 URL doesn't appear to be valid. You're using the right tarballs so I'll approve the package, but the URL should be corrected. Package approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604659] Review Request: perl-Test-EOL - Check the correct line endings in your project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604659 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||emmanuel.sey...@club-intern ||et.fr AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|emmanuel.sey...@club-intern ||et.fr Flag||fedora-review? Bug 604659 depends on bug 604653, which changed state. Bug 604653 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-NoTabs - Check the presence of tabs in your project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604653 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608206] Review Request: zn_poly - C library for polynomial arithmetic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608206 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-06-27 07:08:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Some suggests: > 1.License:(GPLv2 or GPLv3) and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ > -> GPLv3 > Because license field only applies to binary rpm Note that this is not true, since "(GPLv2 or GPLv3) and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+" resolves to "GPLv2 or GPLv3". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608206] Review Request: zn_poly - C library for polynomial arithmetic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608206
--- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-06-27 07:06:54
EDT ---
I'm not sure I agree with
cp -pv include/*.h %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/zn_poly/src/
If flint assumes a nonstandard location for the headers, then it should be
fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608206] Review Request: zn_poly - C library for polynomial arithmetic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608206 --- Comment #5 from Chen Lei 2010-06-27 07:06:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Jussi, thanks for the review. > (In reply to comment #1) > > Some suggests: > > 1.License:(GPLv2 or GPLv3) and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ > > -> GPLv3 > > Because license field only applies to binary rpm > It's in summary GPLv3, yes, but I refer to: > See http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2010-May/007075.html for more explanation. I think the mainpackage is a pure GPLv3 license, the license for -devel may be a bit complicated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608206] Review Request: zn_poly - C library for polynomial arithmetic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608206 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura 2010-06-27 07:00:35 EDT --- flint wants to have the headers in zn_poly/src Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/zn_poly.spec SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/zn_poly-0.9-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608405] New: Review Request: perl-Config-GitLike - Git-compatible config file parsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-GitLike - Git-compatible config file parsing Alias: perl-Config-GitLike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608405 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-GitLike - Git-compatible config file parsing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Config-GitLike/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Config-GitLike.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Config-GitLike-1.04-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: This module handles interaction with configuration files of the style used by the version control system Git. It can both parse and modify these files, as well as create entirely new ones. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2275634 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581324] Review Request: perl-IO-Handle-Util - Utilities for working with IO::Handle-like objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581324
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman
2010-06-27 06:44:59 EDT ---
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2275594
[x] Rpmlint output: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPL+ or Artistic
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
ece953bc43c2e5914f92ec186cba0086 IO-Handle-Util-0.01.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[-] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: rawhide.x86_64
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2275594
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[x] %check is present and the tests pass
All tests successful.
Files=4, Tests=372, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.00 sys + 0.21 cusr 0.03
csys = 0.30 CPU)
Result: PASS
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581324] Review Request: perl-IO-Handle-Util - Utilities for working with IO::Handle-like objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581324 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||emmanuel.sey...@club-intern ||et.fr AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|emmanuel.sey...@club-intern ||et.fr Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
