[Bug 602279] Review Request: LibRaw - Library for reading RAW files obtained from digital photo cameras
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602279
--- Comment #18 from Siddhesh Poyarekar spoya...@redhat.com 2010-07-05
02:12:53 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
OK, if you intend to package for Fedora, you can remove BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root and rm -rf %{buildroot} as
well.
Ok thanks, I'll do this in the next revision once the license details are
sorted out..
LGPLv2.1 is not enough for LibRaw.
See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Dual_Licensing_Scenarios
Thanks for clarifying. I've sent an email to legal list asking for direction on
this:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2010-July/001313.html
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 580480] Review Request: ghc-type-level - A type-level library for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580480 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-07-05 02:52:50 EDT --- For reference: type-level is needed by ForSyDe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #27 from Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com 2010-07-05 03:01:33 EDT --- On mintMenu project page [1] it says licence is GPL v2 So only LICENSE file for GPL is missing, the licence is clear, right? [1] https://launchpad.net/mintmenu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597597] Review Request: liblouis - A Braille translator and back-translator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597597
--- Comment #10 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2010-07-05
03:28:20 EDT ---
Hi Lars,
%doc doc/liblouis.* also adds the unwanted files liblouis.info and
liblouis.texi. To avoid this, explicitly list the intended files, e.g. with
%doc doc/liblouis.{html,txt}
Since the tarball contains a texinfo file, you could create a pdf file from it
and add it as a further documentation variant. To do so, simply add
BuildRequires: texinfo-tex, call make -C doc liblouis.pdf in %build, and
append pdf to the above %doc suffix list.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 210027] Review Request: bitmap - Bitmap editor and converter utilities for the X Window System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210027 Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trem...@tremble.org.uk Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk 2010-07-05 03:41:02 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: bitmap New Branches: EL-6 Owners: tremble https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610817 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611084] Review Request: python-mailer - A module that simplifies sending email
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611084 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mschwe...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mschwe...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #28 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-05 04:39:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) So only LICENSE file for GPL is missing, the licence is clear, right? Nope, the websites usually don't distinguish between GPLv2 only and GPLv2 or any later version. I'm afraid you will have to ask the authors and while you are at it, please tell them to add proper license headers to their code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611454] New: Review Request: python-bcrypt - Python bindings for OpenBSD's Blowfish password hashing code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-bcrypt - Python bindings for OpenBSD's Blowfish password hashing code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611454 Summary: Review Request: python-bcrypt - Python bindings for OpenBSD's Blowfish password hashing code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: davi...@ultracar.co.uk QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dcr226.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/python-bcrypt.spec SRPM URL: http://dcr226.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-bcrypt-0.1-1.src.rpm Description: python-bcrypt is a Python wrapper of OpenBSD's Blowfish password hashing code, as described in A Future-Adaptable Password Scheme by Niels Provos and David Mazières. This system hashes passwords using a version of Bruce Schneier's Blowfish block cipher with modifications designed to raise the cost of off-line password cracking and frustrate fast hardware implementation. The computation cost of the algorithm is parametised, so it can be increased as computers get faster. The intent is to make a compromise of a password database less likely to result in an attacker gaining knowledge of the plaintext passwords (e.g. using John the Ripper). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|maxamill...@fedoraproject.o ||rg --- Comment #12 from Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com 2010-07-05 07:06:42 EDT --- Added missing 'assigned to' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226443] Merge Review: switchdesk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226443 Ngo Than t...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #4 from Ngo Than t...@redhat.com 2010-07-05 07:12:39 EDT --- working on this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608326] Review Request: gtkmm30 - C++ interface for the GTK+ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608326 --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2010-07-05 07:16:55 EDT --- * Mon Jul 05 2010 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee - 2.90.4.0-1 - Update to 2.90.4.0 Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/gtkmm30.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/gtkmm30-2.90.4.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2295904 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 610211] Review Request: unique3 - Single instance support for GTK3 applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610211 Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #12 from Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com 2010-07-05 07:16:49 EDT --- Changing status to assigned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603632] Review Request: typemade-josefinsansstd-light-fonts - This typeface was to made for geometric, elegant titling and kind of vintage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603632 Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psatp...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603632] Review Request: typemade-josefinsansstd-light-fonts - This typeface was to made for geometric, elegant titling and kind of vintage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603632 Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com 2010-07-05 07:21:37 EDT --- I see you are asking for fedora cvs. Accordingly set flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608066] Review request: ldc - a compiler for the D programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608066 Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #10 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com 2010-07-05 07:28:31 EDT --- Jonathan is already sponsored, as he said... https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/bioinfornatics -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 505354] Review Request: php-captchaphp - PHP very user-friendly CAPTCHA solution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505354 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-05 08:03:18 EDT --- php-captchaphp-2.2-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-captchaphp-2.2-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 505354] Review Request: php-captchaphp - PHP very user-friendly CAPTCHA solution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505354 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-05 08:03:28 EDT --- php-captchaphp-2.2-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-captchaphp-2.2-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226111] Merge Review: lvm2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226111 --- Comment #22 from Alasdair Kergon a...@redhat.com 2010-07-05 08:04:51 EDT --- I think most of that got done by now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611476] Review Request: dhcp_probe - Tool for discover DHCP and BootP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611476 Guillermo Gómez guillermo.go...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555018] Review Request: gnac - An audio converter for GNOME (first package, seeking sponsor)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555018 --- Comment #15 from Taylon taylonsi...@gmail.com 2010-07-05 08:39:31 EDT --- Yes, I'm still interested. I'll upgrade to the latest release to other reviews. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 --- Comment #24 from Wes Hardaker wjhns...@hardakers.net 2010-07-05 09:12:16 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: dnssec-tools New Branches: EL-5 EL-6 Owners: hardaker just adding branches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608066] Review request: ldc - a compiler for the D programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608066 --- Comment #11 from Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com 2010-07-05 09:10:22 EDT --- @Casey Dahlin Ok, my bad, as Jonathan is already sponsored - in case you consider this as approved mark the flag. Don't forget to change status as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 Wes Hardaker wjhns...@hardakers.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611040] Review Request: python-importlib - Backport of importlib.import_module() from Python 2.7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611040
Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||dmalc...@redhat.com,
||toms...@fedoraproject.org
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|toms...@fedoraproject.org
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-05
09:45:12 EDT ---
Don't you need at least a Conflicts with python(abi) = 2.7?
In python-celery you currently commented out the requires on this package, this
could be resolved by e.g.:
%{!?pyver: %global pyver %(%{__python} -c import sys ; print
sys.version[:3])}
%if pyver 2.7
Requires: python-importlib
%endif
This way, when rebuilding all packages with python2.7 (or above) this will be
cone automatic.
Furthermore, when using a conflicts on python2.7, this package won't being
build in = 2.7 and everyone will notice, that this can be a dead.package.
Do you (=Fabian) have another resolution for this, or David, what's your
preference?
(Anything else looks fine at the first sign.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608923] audacity - add cvs epel 5,6 branches
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608923 --- Comment #3 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2010-07-05 10:02:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) No idea why this was opened against package review. I thought the following suggested exactly that when there is no existing review request (as far as my search went): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages please use the existing review ticket for requests, even though it may well be CLOSED (please do not reopen it). If a review ticket does not exist or you really cannot find it, then creating a new bug is acceptable. I can update the wiki ( I think ) if that isn't what is meant. Is there a specific non review request component for cvs that I would mention ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608923] audacity - add cvs epel 5,6 branches
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608923 Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trem...@tremble.org.uk --- Comment #4 from Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk 2010-07-05 10:09:38 EDT --- The bug is usually created against the existing package (frequently against rawhide) so that the Fedora devs can see it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 463130] Review Request: perl-IPC-Run-SafeHandles - Use IPC::Run and IPC::Run3 safely
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463130 Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trem...@tremble.org.uk Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk 2010-07-05 11:40:44 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-IPC-Run-SafeHandles New Branches: EL-6 Owners: tremble corsepiu listed as not interested in EPEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592579] Review Request: Frama-c - Framework for source code analysis of C software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592579 --- Comment #34 from Mark Rader msra...@gmail.com 2010-07-05 12:48:49 EDT --- I completed the koji build and all built successfully under FC-14. Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2296280 None Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2296280 build (dist-f14, frama-c-1.4-4.fc12.src.rpm): free 2296280 build (dist-f14, frama-c-1.4-4.fc12.src.rpm): free - open (xb-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2296282 buildArch (frama-c-1.4-4.fc12.src.rpm, i686): free 2296281 buildArch (frama-c-1.4-4.fc12.src.rpm, x86_64): open (xb-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2296282 buildArch (frama-c-1.4-4.fc12.src.rpm, i686): free - open (x86-09.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2296282 buildArch (frama-c-1.4-4.fc12.src.rpm, i686): open (x86-09.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 2 open 1 done 0 failed 2296281 buildArch (frama-c-1.4-4.fc12.src.rpm, x86_64): open (xb-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 2 done 0 failed 2296280 build (dist-f14, frama-c-1.4-4.fc12.src.rpm): open (xb-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 3 done 0 failed 2296280 build (dist-f14, frama-c-1.4-4.fc12.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226111] Merge Review: lvm2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226111
--- Comment #23 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2010-07-05 13:04:40
EDT ---
Currently reviewing lvm2-2.02.69-1.fc14.src.rpm.
rpmlint output now stands at
cmirror.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /etc/rc.d/init.d/cmirrord 0555L
cmirror.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in
/etc/rc.d/init.d/cmirrord
cmirror.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/cmirrord
device-mapper.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libudev
device-mapper.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userspace - user
space, user-space, users pace
device-mapper-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
device-mapper-event.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/dmeventd
0555L
device-mapper-event-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
device-mapper-event-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
libdevmapper - clapperboard, understrapper, backslapper
device-mapper-event-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
device-mapper-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libdevmapper
- clapperboard, understrapper, backslapper
device-mapper-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
lvm2.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Userland - User land, User-land,
Sunderland
lvm2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mdadd - daddy, Madden,
Maddox
lvm2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US losetup - lo setup,
lo-setup, loser
lvm2.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
lvm2.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
lvm2.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Userland - User land, User-land,
Sunderland
lvm2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mdadd - daddy, Madden,
Maddox
lvm2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US losetup - lo setup,
lo-setup, loser
lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/lvmconf 0555L
lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/lvm 0555L
lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lock/lvm 0700L
lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /etc/rc.d/init.d/lvm2-monitor
0555L
lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/lvmdump 0555L
lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/vgimportclone 0555L
lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/fsadm 0555L
lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/lvm/backup 0700L
lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/lvm 0700L
lvm2.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /etc/lvm/cache/.cache
lvm2.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/lvm/cache/.cache 0600L
lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/lvm/archive 0700L
lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/lvm/cache 0700L
lvm2.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/lvm2-monitor
lvm2.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/lvm2-monitor
lvm2.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/lvm2-monitor
lvm2.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name lvm2-monitor ('lvm2', 'lvm2d')
lvm2-cluster.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) userland - user land,
user-land, Sunderland
lvm2-cluster.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /etc/rc.d/init.d/clvmd
0555L
lvm2-cluster.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in
/etc/rc.d/init.d/clvmd
lvm2-cluster.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name clvmd ('lvm2-cluster',
'lvm2-clusterd')
lvm2-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
lvm2-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
lvm2-libs.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/lib64/device-mapper/libdevmapper-event-lvm2snapshot.so 0555L
lvm2-libs.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/lib64/device-mapper/libdevmapper-event-lvm2mirror.so 0555L
13 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 18 errors, 27 warnings.
- The explicit libudev require is OK.
- The no-buildroot and no-cleaning-of-buildroot warnings are OK, since this
version is in rawhide where RPM handles this stuff automatically. (Wouldn't
hurt having them, though.)
- Although normally services aren't usually enabled by default, I'm sure LVM as
a core package is a sane exception to the rule.
What I think should still be fixed:
- The perms are usually 755 for libraries and executables. Please fix the
install commands in the Makefile, or run chmod in %install.
- Add the reload entries and the Default-Stop lines to the init scripts.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Required_Actions
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#.23_Default-Stop:_line
Otherwise all of the issues of comment #2 have been addressed.
PS. Shouldn't the URL be
http://sourceware.org/lvm2/ ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226111] Merge Review: lvm2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226111 --- Comment #24 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2010-07-05 13:10:46 EDT --- Oh, I also see that there are some errors in the build caused by missing headers, e.g. lvm_vg.c:15:17: error: lib.h: No such file or directory In file included from lvm_vg.c:16: lvm2app.h:17:26: error: libdevmapper.h: No such file or directory lvm_vg.c:17:25: error: toolcontext.h: No such file or directory lvm_vg.c:18:31: error: metadata-exported.h: No such file or directory lvm_vg.c:19:22: error: archiver.h: No such file or directory lvm_vg.c:20:21: error: locking.h: No such file or directory lvm_vg.c:21:24: error: lvm-string.h: No such file or directory lvm_vg.c:22:22: error: lvmcache.h: No such file or directory lvm_vg.c:23:22: error: metadata.h: No such file or directory Maybe you'll want to have a look at this, as well.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611043] Review Request: python-billiard - Multiprocessing Pool Extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611043 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|toms...@fedoraproject.org Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-05 13:10:36 EDT --- Review: Good: - name ok - $ rpmlint ./python-billiard-0.3.1-1.fc13.src.rpm ./noarch/python-billiard-0.3.1-1.fc13.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - license ok - spec readable - BR/R ok - builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2296433 - %files mostly ok The Makefile is not needed, but 4kB overhead is kind of ignorable. Similar for TODO, this single line with a link to a the web is not really usefull, when sitting in a train e.g. Nothing to be done. (Just idealistic things :)) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608470] Review Request: perl-Test-Script-Run - Test scripts with Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608470 --- Comment #3 from Jérôme Fenal jfe...@free.fr 2010-07-05 14:43:36 EDT --- Oh, and for EPEL, yes, this can't work as IPC::Run3 is not yet pushed from Fedora to EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608470] Review Request: perl-Test-Script-Run - Test scripts with Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608470
--- Comment #2 from Jérôme Fenal jfe...@free.fr 2010-07-05 14:42:26 EDT ---
Now tracking changes with git at http://github.com/jfenal/perl-Test-Script-Run.
Followed all recommandations:
- release naming
- file globbing
- DESTDIR
- %{?perl_default_filter}
$ rpmlint ~/rpm/RPMS/noarch/perl-Test-Script-Run-0.04-2.fc13.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint ~/rpm/SRPMS/perl-Test-Script-Run-0.04-2.fc13.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Packages spec available at
- http://jfenal.free.fr/rpm/perl-Test-Script-Run.spec
- http://jfenal.free.fr/rpm/perl-Test-Script-Run-0.04-2.fc13.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607802] Review Request: Agender - A small, simple and cross-platform schedule tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607802 --- Comment #3 from Gabriel Espinoza virtuoso...@users.sourceforge.net 2010-07-05 14:44:24 EDT --- I think i won't package for fedora, this system has become worst after fc10, thanks for the bug althoug it doesn't happen in my system, and for the sugestion (%setup -q), could you send me some info about the system where you tested it (fedora version, wx version, arch, memory, etc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607802] Review Request: Agender - A small, simple and cross-platform schedule tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607802 --- Comment #4 from Gabriel Espinoza virtuoso...@users.sourceforge.net 2010-07-05 14:55:05 EDT --- maybe i will move to suse or debian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607802] Review Request: Agender - A small, simple and cross-platform schedule tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607802 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-07-05 14:55:27 EDT --- [tasa...@localhost ~]$ uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.33.5-124.fc13.i686 #1 SMP Fri Jun 11 09:48:40 UTC 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [tasa...@localhost ~]$ rpm -q fedora-release wxGTK fedora-release-14-0.4.noarch wxGTK-2.8.11-1.fc14.i686 (In reply to comment #3) I think i won't package for fedora, Well, then should I close this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607802] Review Request: Agender - A small, simple and cross-platform schedule tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607802 --- Comment #6 from Gabriel Espinoza virtuoso...@users.sourceforge.net 2010-07-05 15:04:05 EDT --- yes, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607802] Review Request: Agender - A small, simple and cross-platform schedule tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607802 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-07-05 15:06:21 EDT --- Once closing. Thank you anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225771] Merge Review: fribidi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225771 Michel Alexandre Salim michael.silva...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim michael.silva...@gmail.com 2010-07-05 15:16:43 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: fribidi New Branches: EL-5 EL-6 Owners: salimma See comment above -- needed for newer fbreader releases -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226111] Merge Review: lvm2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226111 --- Comment #25 from Alasdair Kergon a...@redhat.com 2010-07-05 15:14:58 EDT --- Using program and file names in descriptions is a spelling-error??? Another incompletely-implemented feature... The buildroot check message it gives is also inverted for Fedora: we were explicitly instructed to remove it from the package in the past. (This is because they respecified a better default and that meant changing every spec file that had the old one in. Far better to leave it out so the default would only need changing in one place in future.) Perms as I said above I won't be changing unless there is a demonstrable problem with any of them. The URLs point to the same place. The service thing was a bit awkward and it would be nice to work out a better way to handle it, but under some machine configurations it is required to be running (or the machine may freeze) so the script has to run at startup but it only leaves a daemon running on the system if one is actually needed (which addresses the main objection people have to enabled by default I think). Default-stop a dummy reload (we can't reload this daemon without unmounting filesystems using it) need adding. Build errors I hadn't noticed. (Unless it's from the debuginfo generation scripts which have been broken for years.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608326] Review Request: gtkmm30 - C++ interface for the GTK+ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608326 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2010-07-05 15:32:33 EDT --- Reopening the ticket; looks like you closed a wrong one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||axel.th...@atrpms.net, ||joc...@herr-schmitt.de Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net 2010-07-05 15:30:24 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: libFoundation New Branches: remove package The package was introduced as a dependency for OGo, but the latter never made it to the repo. Currently the package requires special handling of coinstallation policies in order to allow gnustep parts into Fedora. There have been requests to remove the package, which is probably the right thing to do atm. See also bug #531899 Wrt procedure: I'm following https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests which is newer than https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Both address the topic of removing a package in different ways (CVS admin request vs dead.package and new bugzilla request). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608326] Review Request: gtkmm30 - C++ interface for the GTK+ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608326 Bug 608326 depends on bug 610195, which changed state. Bug 610195 Summary: update gtkmm24 in rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610195 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 515247] Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515247 --- Comment #18 from Germán Racca gra...@gmail.com 2010-07-05 15:47:57 EDT --- OK Jussi, as Chess said that he has no more time to dedicate to this package, I'm going to open a new review request. Regards, Germán, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-07-05 15:51:23 EDT --- Please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life I will fix the admin requests page. The only time we really remove a package like that is when it has non free content or some other drastic problem, otherwise we want the package to exist in cvs history and such. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 605859] Review Request: python-eggtestinfo - Python setuptools plugin for adding test information to .egg-info
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605859 --- Comment #2 from Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com 2010-07-05 16:23:24 EDT --- What is the proper license name? I've tried all combinations of PSFL/Python/etc. Same for ZPL/ZPLv2/etc. rpmlint always seems to complain no matter what I put. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 605859] Review Request: python-eggtestinfo - Python setuptools plugin for adding test information to .egg-info
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605859 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-07-05 16:57:44 EDT --- As far as I can see the the license short name for the license tag should be: Python or ZPLv1.0 for those licenses. Another issue is that upstream only make a vague statement about the license. There is no license statement in the source header and there is no license file in the source tarball. Only a statement on the website. This can become a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 --- Comment #20 from Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net 2010-07-05 17:50:50 EDT --- Actually the devel and F-13 branches had already been taken care of, I had just forgotten and the bug report in #531899 the package was still alive. Sorry for the red herring! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593804] Review Request: plasma-runner-events - Add new events or todos to your calendar from KRunner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593804 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-05 18:01:02 EDT --- plasma-runner-events-0.3.0-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609352] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding - Unicode aware Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609352 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-05 18:01:36 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding-1.0-1.fc12.2 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding-1.0-1.fc12.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609348] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole - Apply roles to action instances
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609348 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-05 18:03:34 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole-0.14-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole-0.14-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604500] Review Request: ibus-input-pad - Input Pad for IBus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604500 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-05 18:03:39 EDT --- ibus-input-pad-0.1.0.20100630-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ibus-input-pad'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-input-pad-0.1.0.20100630-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592388] Review Request: vor - Variations on Rockdogders is an 2D space shooter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592388 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-05 18:06:52 EDT --- vor-0.5.5-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593804] Review Request: plasma-runner-events - Add new events or todos to your calendar from KRunner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593804 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-05 18:05:33 EDT --- plasma-runner-events-0.3.0-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604500] Review Request: ibus-input-pad - Input Pad for IBus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604500 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-05 18:07:03 EDT --- ibus-input-pad-0.1.0.20100630-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ibus-input-pad'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-input-pad-0.1.0.20100630-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592388] Review Request: vor - Variations on Rockdogders is an 2D space shooter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592388 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||vor-0.5.5-2.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609352] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding - Unicode aware Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609352 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-05 18:05:57 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding-1.0-1.fc13.2 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding-1.0-1.fc13.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600638] Review Request: seed - GNOME JavaScript interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600638 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||seed-2.30.0-2.fc13 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608326] Review Request: gtkmm30 - C++ interface for the GTK+ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608326 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2010-07-05 18:52:28 EDT --- Alright, here is the rest of the complete review: * rpmlint says: gtkmm30.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gtkmm/2.90.4.0./gtkmm-2.90.4.0.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not Found gtkmm30.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gtkmm These two can be ignored. However gtkmm30.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US typesafe - type safe, type-safe, typeset gtkmm30.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libgtkmm-3.0.so.1.1.0 ['/usr/lib64'] These two need a fix ! Please make the description span 80 columns as much as possible. Currently it is set to 70 columns. ! BRs: cairomm-devel and glibmm24-devel seem redundant. They get pulled it by other dependencies. They don't cause any harm though. ! The package gtk-doc is listed as a dependency for directory ownership. This is fine for now. However keep in mind that there is a discussion to change this policy so that all packages that use usr/share/gtk-doc/ must own this directory. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Revised_File_and_Directory_Ownership#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608069] Tango standard library for D language of d1 specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608069 Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pikachu.2...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com 2010-07-05 19:31:48 EDT --- ruby (at least) is a missing BuildRequires. Moreover, the script ./build/script/bob.rb called to compile tango is completely silent. Could you make it more verbose ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 515752] Review Request: python-soaplib - python library for creating SOAP services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515752 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a.bad...@gmail.com --- Comment #20 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2010-07-05 19:48:28 EDT --- Note 1: Changing the hash algorithm and compression algorithm is better done on the rpmbuild commandline instead of inside the spec file. You can also do yum install fedora-packager rpmbuild-md5 -bs python-soaplib.spec (reading /usr/bin/rpmbuild-md5 will show you the commandline options to pass to rpmbuild to use the correct algorithms for EL-5) Note 2: Unless there's a legal reason to change the upstream tarball (like stripping out patent encumbered files) we should always use the upstream tarball without modification. in the %prep section we can modify the folder structure by running mv, cp, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603904] Review Request: xautomation - Tools to automate tasks in X, even detecting on screen images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603904 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-05 19:52:32 EDT --- xautomation-1.03-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xautomation-1.03-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603904] Review Request: xautomation - Tools to automate tasks in X, even detecting on screen images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603904 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-05 20:05:26 EDT --- xautomation-1.03-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xautomation-1.03-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608973] Review Request: gtk-equinox-engine - Equinox theme engine for GTK+ 2.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608973 --- Comment #10 from Germán Racca gra...@gmail.com 2010-07-05 23:57:11 EDT --- Hello Julian: I've informed upstream about the changes we'll make in the Fedora package with respect to the icon theme. We'll use Gnome icon theme while Faenza is not ready. Because of this, I've added the corresponding Requires in the spec file. I've also corrected the release number because I've made a mistake before, and I've removed the BuildRoot tag as you suggested. Please find the updated files here: Spec URL: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/gtk-equinox-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/gtk-equinox-engine-1.20-2.fc13.i686.rpm $ rpmlint SRPMS/gtk-equinox-engine-1.20-2.fc13.src.rpm gtk-equinox-engine.src: W: no-buildroot-tag 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/i686/gtk-equinox-engine-1.20-2.fc13.i686.rpm gtk-equinox-engine.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libequinox.so $ koji build --scratch dist-f13 rpmbuild/SRPMS/gtk-equinox-engine-1.20-2.fc13.src.rpm Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2297296 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608973] Review Request: gtk-equinox-engine - Equinox theme engine for GTK+ 2.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608973 --- Comment #11 from Germán Racca gra...@gmail.com 2010-07-06 00:03:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) SRPM URL: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/gtk-equinox-engine-1.20-2.fc13.i686.rpm Sorry, that url is for the rpm package (that I removed). The source rpm is here: SRPM URL: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/gtk-equinox-engine-1.20-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523877] Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-07-06 00:14:01 EDT --- Nobody has ever signed on to do a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597035] Review Request: ibus-table-others - Various tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597035 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||595551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595551] Review Request: ibus-table-mathwriter - ibus-table-mathwriter provides input method for writing Unicode Math symbols
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595551 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||597035 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
