[Bug 615129] Review Request: cjkuni-ukai-fonts - Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Kai face

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615129

Peng Wu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 615128] Review Request: cjkuni-uming-fonts - Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Ming face

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615128

Peng Wu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 615128] Review Request: cjkuni-uming-fonts - Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Ming face

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615128

--- Comment #8 from Peng Wu  2010-07-27 02:45:53 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name:  cjkuni-uming-fonts
Short Description: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Ming face
Owners: pwu
Branches: F-13 F-14
InitialCC: petersen i18n-team

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 614298] Review Request: emacs-apel - A Portable Emacs Library

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614298

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग)  2010-07-27 02:46:39 EDT 
---

Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i686).
koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2353361
+ rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM.
emacs-apel.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
emacs-apel-el.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Elisp -> Elis, Lisp,
Elise
emacs-apel-el.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US elisp -> lisp, e
lisp, Elise
emacs-apel-el.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided apel
emacs-apel-el.noarch: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.

+ source files match upstream url (sha1sum)
089c18ae006df093aa2edaeb486bfaead6ac4918  apel-10.8.tar.gz
089c18ae006df093aa2edaeb486bfaead6ac4918  apel-10.8.tar.gz.srpm

+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present which is not needed now.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Follow emacs addon packaging guidelines.
+ Not a GUI application

APPROVED.

Suggestions:
1)If package is needed only for F-13 and above then please follow
 a) %clean not needed
 b) cleaning of buildroot at start of %install also not needed

2) See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2353362&name=build.log
I think its good to ask upstream to follow new style in *.el files.

3) installing commands should preserve timestamps. Use
make install PREFIX=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} \
LISPDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_emacs_sitelispdir} INSTALL="install -p"

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 615129] Review Request: cjkuni-ukai-fonts - Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Kai face

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615129

--- Comment #6 from Peng Wu  2010-07-27 02:47:31 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name:  cjkuni-ukai-fonts
Short Description: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Kai face
Owners: pwu
Branches: F-13 F-14
InitialCC: petersen i18n-team

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 614329] Review Request: emacs-common-w3m - W3m interface for Emacsen

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614329

Akira TAGOH  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||peter...@redhat.com

--- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH  2010-07-27 02:33:08 EDT ---
*** Bug 595213 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731

--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System  
2010-07-27 02:00:16 EDT ---
ibus-handwrite-2.1.0-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-handwrite-2.1.0-2.fc12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 575005] Review Request: zinnia-tomoe - Online hand recognition system with machine learning

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575005

--- Comment #57 from Fedora Update System  
2010-07-27 01:57:17 EDT ---
zinnia-0.06-8.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zinnia-0.06-8.fc12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 615812] Review Request: geronimo-interceptor - Java EE: Interceptor API v3.0

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812

Chris Spike  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

--- Comment #8 from Chris Spike  2010-07-27 00:58:46 EDT 
---
Package built, closing.

Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2353375

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 616250] Review Request: geronimo-ejb - Java EE: EJB API v3.1

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616250

Bug 616250 depends on bug 615812, which changed state.

Bug 615812 Summary: Review Request: geronimo-interceptor - Java EE: Interceptor 
API v3.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028

--- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil  2010-07-27 
00:57:35 EDT ---
Apparently, I never built this on mock, because when I prepared it for review,
lv2-c++-tools was not in the repos. I added the missing BRs.

The DSO error is something that came with F-13. From F-13 on, Fedora does not
allow indirect linking to libraries. So I added the missing link.

Thanks for the warnings.

SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/lv2-ll-plugins.spec
SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-3.fc13.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 615809] Review Request: geronimo-annotation - Java EE: Annotation API v1.1

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615809

Chris Spike  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

--- Comment #9 from Chris Spike  2010-07-27 00:57:30 EDT 
---
Package built, closing.

Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2353374

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 616250] Review Request: geronimo-ejb - Java EE: EJB API v3.1

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616250

Bug 616250 depends on bug 615809, which changed state.

Bug 615809 Summary: Review Request: geronimo-annotation - Java EE: Annotation 
API v1.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615809

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 614329] Review Request: emacs-common-w3m - W3m interface for Emacsen

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614329

Akira TAGOH  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH  2010-07-27 00:51:44 EDT ---
Thanks for reviews. the above suggestions has been applied with:

Spec URL:
http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/emacs-common-w3m/emacs-common-w3m.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/emacs-common-w3m/emacs-common-w3m-1.4.398-0.3.20100714cvs.fc14.src.rpm

New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: emacs-common-w3m
Short Description: W3m interface for Emacsen
Owners: tagoh
Branches: devel F-13 F-12
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 615192] Review Request: cjkuni-fonts-ghostscript -Chinese Unicode TrueType font ghostscript files

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615192

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग)  2010-07-27 00:14:46 EDT 
---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i686).
koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2350726
+ rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM.
cjkuni-fonts-ghostscript.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
cjkuni-fonts-ghostscript.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean
cjkuni-fonts-ghostscript.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
cjkuni-fonts-ghostscript.src: W: no-%clean-section
=> These are not needed to fixed.
+ source files match upstream url (sha1sum)
08521808c1a1ec4cd12f940a2ae9f53fc0b4c685  cjkuni-fonts-gscid-0.3.tgz
08521808c1a1ec4cd12f940a2ae9f53fc0b4c685  cjkuni-fonts-gscid-0.3.tgz.srpm
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present which is not needed now.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Not a GUI application

Suggestions:
1) looks like license headers in files have text mentioning license is given in
COPYING file whereas new upstream tarball provides LICENSE file.

Can it be possible to upstream to change reference of COPYING word to LICENSE
word in all 6 files?

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 614329] Review Request: emacs-common-w3m - W3m interface for Emacsen

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614329

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग)  2010-07-26 23:59:54 EDT 
---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i686).
koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2350728
+ rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM.
emacs-common-w3m.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean
emacs-common-w3m.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
emacs-common-w3m.src: W: no-%clean-section
emacs-common-w3m.src: W: invalid-url Source0: emacs-w3m-1.4.398.tar.gz
emacs-w3m.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) elisp -> lisp, e lisp, Elise
emacs-w3m.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US elisp -> lisp, e
lisp, Elise
emacs-w3m.noarch: W: no-documentation
emacs-w3m-el.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Elisp -> Elis, Lisp,
Elise
emacs-w3m-el.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US elisp -> lisp, e
lisp, Elise
emacs-w3m-el.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided w3m-el
emacs-w3m-el.noarch: W: no-documentation
xemacs-w3m.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) elisp -> lisp, e lisp,
Elise
xemacs-w3m.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US elisp -> lisp, e
lisp, Elise
xemacs-w3m.noarch: W: no-documentation
xemacs-w3m-el.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Elisp -> Elis, Lisp,
Elise
xemacs-w3m-el.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US elisp -> lisp, e
lisp, Elise
xemacs-w3m-el.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided w3m-el-xemacs
xemacs-w3m-el.noarch: W: no-documentation
=> These messages can be ignored
emacs-w3m.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Emacs-w3m
==>This is not a blocker though as its because of following the spec template
for emacs addons.

+ source files match upstream url when packaged according to given steps.
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present which is not needed now.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ following emacs packaging guidelines
+ Not a GUI application

Suggestions:
1) use install commands with "install -p" to preserve timestamps 
2)wherever possible use
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make

Please do the above changes before you import this in cvs.
APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 616586] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Method-Signatures - Method declarations with type constraints and no source filter

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616586

Iain Arnell  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
 Depends on||611069(perl-Devel-Declare),
   ||615164

--- Comment #7 from Iain Arnell  2010-07-26 23:51:08 EDT ---
Thanks for the review.

Updated, imported and built in rawhide. Waiting for perl-Devel-Declare and
perl-MooseX-Meta-TypeConstraint-ForceCoercion on branches.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 615164] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Meta-TypeConstraint-ForceCoercion - Force coercion when validating type constraints

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615164

Iain Arnell  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||616586

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 611069] Review Request: perl-Devel-Declare - Adding keywords to perl, in perl

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611069

Iain Arnell  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||616586

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 614967] Review Request: perl-Git-PurePerl - Pure Perl interface to Git repositories

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614967

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  2010-07-26 
23:47:00 EDT ---
perl-Git-PurePerl-0.46-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Git-PurePerl-0.46-2.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617764] Review Request: gphotoframe - Photo Frame Gadget for the GNOME Desktop

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617764

Mamoru Tasaka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

--- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka  2010-07-26 
23:40:14 EDT ---
Rebuilt for dist-f14, dist-f13-updates-candidate, dist-f12-updates-candidate
and dist-f14-py27-rebuild and submitted push requests for F-13/12,
closing.

Thank you for review and CVS procedure.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 599638] Review Request: perl-YAPE-Regex - Yet Another Parser/Extractor for Regular Expressions

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599638

Iain Arnell  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 599638] Review Request: perl-YAPE-Regex - Yet Another Parser/Extractor for Regular Expressions

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599638

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  2010-07-26 
23:27:35 EDT ---
perl-YAPE-Regex-3.04-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-YAPE-Regex-3.04-1.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst & DBIx::Class powered Wiki

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358

Iain Arnell  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 599638] Review Request: perl-YAPE-Regex - Yet Another Parser/Extractor for Regular Expressions

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599638

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  2010-07-26 
23:27:41 EDT ---
perl-YAPE-Regex-3.04-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-YAPE-Regex-3.04-1.fc12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 616768] Review Request: gnome-gmail - Make Gmail an option for the default Gnome mail handler

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616768

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2010-07-26 
22:56:19 EDT ---
gnome-gmail-1.5.1-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnome-gmail'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-gmail-1.5.1-1.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 583327] Review Request: clementine - A music player and library organizer

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583327

--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  
2010-07-26 22:55:45 EDT ---
clementine-0.4.2-5.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update clementine'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clementine-0.4.2-5.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617479] Review Request: perl-GD-SecurityImage - Security image (captcha) generator

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617479

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2010-07-26 
22:54:59 EDT ---
perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.70-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-GD-SecurityImage'.  You
can provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.70-1.fc12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617478] Review Request: perl-Data-Random - Perl module to generate random data

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617478

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2010-07-26 
22:51:01 EDT ---
perl-Data-Random-0.05-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Data-Random'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-Random-0.05-2.fc12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 611061] Review Request: perl-Data-Stream-Bulk - N at a time iteration API

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611061

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Data-Stream-Bulk-0.07- |perl-Data-Stream-Bulk-0.07-
   |1.fc12  |1.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 611061] Review Request: perl-Data-Stream-Bulk - N at a time iteration API

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611061

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2010-07-26 22:51:16 EDT ---
perl-Data-Stream-Bulk-0.07-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 609193] Review Request: python-dirq - Directory based queue

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609193

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2010-07-26 22:49:19 EDT ---
python-dirq-0.0.5-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-dirq'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-dirq-0.0.5-3.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 616768] Review Request: gnome-gmail - Make Gmail an option for the default Gnome mail handler

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616768

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  2010-07-26 
22:45:18 EDT ---
gnome-gmail-1.5.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnome-gmail'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-gmail-1.5.1-1.fc12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 603233] Review Request: zeromq - Software library for fast, message-based applications

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603233

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||zeromq-2.0.7-4.fc13
 Resolution||ERRATA

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617479] Review Request: perl-GD-SecurityImage - Security image (captcha) generator

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617479

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2010-07-26 
22:42:14 EDT ---
perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.70-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-GD-SecurityImage'.  You
can provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.70-1.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 608419] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-FastCGI - For using CGI::Application under FastCGI

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608419

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-CGI-Application-FastCG |perl-CGI-Application-FastCG
   |I-0.02-2.fc12   |I-0.02-2.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 608419] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-FastCGI - For using CGI::Application under FastCGI

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608419

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2010-07-26 
22:40:34 EDT ---
perl-CGI-Application-FastCGI-0.02-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13
stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 603233] Review Request: zeromq - Software library for fast, message-based applications

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603233

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  
2010-07-26 22:44:54 EDT ---
zeromq-2.0.7-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 608419] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-FastCGI - For using CGI::Application under FastCGI

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608419

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-CGI-Application-FastCG
   ||I-0.02-2.fc12
 Resolution||ERRATA

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 608419] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-FastCGI - For using CGI::Application under FastCGI

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608419

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2010-07-26 
22:37:04 EDT ---
perl-CGI-Application-FastCGI-0.02-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12
stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 610857] Review Request: rubygem-curb - Ruby libcurl bindings

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610857

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2010-07-26 22:34:48 EDT ---
rubygem-curb-0.7.7.1-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-curb'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-curb-0.7.7.1-4.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 611061] Review Request: perl-Data-Stream-Bulk - N at a time iteration API

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611061

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Data-Stream-Bulk-0.07-
   ||1.fc12
 Resolution||ERRATA

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 611061] Review Request: perl-Data-Stream-Bulk - N at a time iteration API

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611061

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2010-07-26 22:28:12 EDT ---
perl-Data-Stream-Bulk-0.07-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617478] Review Request: perl-Data-Random - Perl module to generate random data

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617478

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ON_QA

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  2010-07-26 
22:28:01 EDT ---
perl-Data-Random-0.05-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Data-Random'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-Random-0.05-2.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 583327] Review Request: clementine - A music player and library organizer

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583327

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA

--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  
2010-07-26 22:28:06 EDT ---
clementine-0.4.2-5.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update clementine'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clementine-0.4.2-5.fc12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 609193] Review Request: python-dirq - Directory based queue

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609193

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2010-07-26 22:27:34 EDT ---
python-dirq-0.0.5-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-dirq'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-dirq-0.0.5-3.fc12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618480] New: Review Request: EmfEngine - Library enabling Qt based applications to export graphics to the EMF format

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: EmfEngine - Library enabling Qt based applications to 
export graphics to the  EMF format

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480

   Summary: Review Request: EmfEngine - Library enabling Qt based
applications to export graphics to the  EMF format
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: low
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: supercyp...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Description:
The  Enhanced MetaFile format (EMF) is the native vector graphics file format
on Windows. Qt is a cross-platform application development framework, widely 
used for the development of GUI programs. Although it provides tools for almost
every aspect of software development, Qt doesn't include a straightforward 
solution for the export of 2D graphics to the EMF format. EmfEngine covers this
lack and enables Qt based applications to easily export graphics created using
the QPainter class to the Enhanced Metafile format. It is built on top of the 
QPaintEngine class, which provides an abstract definition of how QPainter draws
to a given device on a given platform. 

Links:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/EmfEngine-0.8-1.fc13.src.rpm
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/EmfEngine.spec

koji build:
F14 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2353138
F12 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2353133


This package is a new dependency for the latest qtiplot.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 609011] Review Request: derby - Relational database implemented entirely in Java

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609011

--- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel  2010-07-26 21:48:55 EDT ---
SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/derby.spec
SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/derby-10.6.1.0-2.fc13.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 609011] Review Request: derby - Relational database implemented entirely in Java

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609011

Lubomir Rintel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mefos...@gmail.com

--- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel  2010-07-26 21:49:27 EDT ---
*** Bug 532520 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 532520] Review request: derby - An open source database implemented entirely in Java

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532520

Lubomir Rintel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||lkund...@v3.sk
 Resolution||DUPLICATE

--- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel  2010-07-26 21:49:27 EDT ---
Inactive review, closing.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 609011 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041

--- Comment #19 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil  2010-07-26 
21:46:14 EDT ---
I asked this, because if this package is not retired, we will need to rebuild
it for python-2.7. Please answer asap. Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041

Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com

--- Comment #18 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil  2010-07-26 
21:42:00 EDT ---
Hello, why is there no cvs record of this package on F-13 and devel?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193898

Ruediger Landmann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||r.landm...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #27 from Ruediger Landmann  2010-07-26 
20:29:11 EDT ---
Package Change Request
===
Package Name: jython
New Branches: EL-5
Owners: rlandmann
InitialCC: 

I have discussed this with Andrew Overholt, the package owner, and he is happy
for me to maintain this branch.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617877] Review Request: txmpp - A C++ XMPP library

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617877

Silas Sewell  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

--- Comment #8 from Silas Sewell  2010-07-26 19:50:05 EDT ---
Built and pushed.

Thanks all.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618451] New: Review Request: gdb-heap - Extensions to gdb for debugging dynamic memory allocation

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: gdb-heap - Extensions to gdb for debugging dynamic 
memory allocation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451

   Summary: Review Request: gdb-heap - Extensions to gdb for
debugging dynamic memory allocation
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: dmalc...@redhat.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---


Spec URL: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/gdb-heap.spec
SRPM URL: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/gdb-heap-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description:
gdb-heap adds a "heap" command to the gdb debugger, for use in debugging
dynamic memory allocation problems in user space.

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MemoryDebuggingTools

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618451] Review Request: gdb-heap - Extensions to gdb for debugging dynamic memory allocation

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451

--- Comment #1 from Dave Malcolm  2010-07-26 19:34:42 EDT 
---
Note: the
  %global glibc_soversion
macro is intended to track the glibc version.  On F-12 this is 2.11.2; on F13
this is 2.11.90 etc.

The purpose of this is to ensure that the hooks get autoloaded by gdb when the
debug information for glibc is loaded.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617620] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPSSL - Perl module for FTP over SSL/TLS

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617620

Lubomir Rintel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

--- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel  2010-07-26 19:19:25 EDT ---
Imported and built, thank you.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 594416] Review Request: json-lib - JSON library for Java

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594416

Lubomir Rintel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

--- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel  2010-07-26 19:19:59 EDT ---
Thanks.
Imported and built.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 609012] Review Request: gooddata-cl - GoodData integration toolkit

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609012

Bug 609012 depends on bug 594416, which changed state.

Bug 594416 Summary: Review Request: json-lib - JSON library for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594416

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 609738] Review Request: shiboken - CPython bindings generator for C++ libraries

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609738

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  
2010-07-26 19:14:39 EDT ---
shiboken-0.3.2-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shiboken-0.3.2-4.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 609738] Review Request: shiboken - CPython bindings generator for C++ libraries

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609738

Kalev Lember  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||shiboken-0.3.2-4.fc14
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

--- Comment #12 from Kalev Lember  2010-07-26 19:12:54 EDT 
---
Imported and built, closing the ticket.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059

--- Comment #6 from Robert Scheck  2010-07-26 
19:05:38 EDT ---
- Point #1 is of course a mistake. Will fix this with the next SPEC/SRPM.
- Point #2 is not optimal, but according to Fedora Legal not a blocker; we've
  had this situation already at another package in the past.
- Point #3 is getting solved in the next release using perl's File::Find, 
  IPC::Open3 and Fcntl. Beside of that, I'm going to call /usr/bin/openssl
  per default, but this can be overwritten if needed using a parameter.

Will likely push new release today or tomorrow and afterwards new SPEC/SRPM.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617620] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPSSL - Perl module for FTP over SSL/TLS

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617620

--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:35:21 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617877] Review Request: txmpp - A C++ XMPP library

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617877

--- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:36:29 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617764] Review Request: gphotoframe - Photo Frame Gadget for the GNOME Desktop

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617764

--- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:35:47 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617797] Review Request: ranger - A flexible console file manager

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617797

--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:36:03 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 616586] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Method-Signatures - Method declarations with type constraints and no source filter

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616586

--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:34:58 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 616354] Review Request: geronimo-jpa - Java persistence API implementation

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616354

--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:34:42 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 615809] Review Request: geronimo-annotation - Java EE: Annotation API v1.1

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615809

--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:33:13 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 599638] Review Request: perl-YAPE-Regex - Yet Another Parser/Extractor for Regular Expressions

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599638

--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:30:51 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 609738] Review Request: shiboken - CPython bindings generator for C++ libraries

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609738

--- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:31:54 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 615812] Review Request: geronimo-interceptor - Java EE: Interceptor API v3.0

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812

--- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:33:38 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 597410] Review Request: php-deepend-Mockery - Mockery is a simple but flexible PHP mock object framewor

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597410

--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:30:22 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 565764] Review Request: sugar-measure - Measure functionality for Sugar

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565764

Kevin Fenzi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |

--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:29:37 EDT ---
Please reset the fedora-cvs flag to ? when you have added a cvs request
template here. 
Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 225266] Merge Review: aspell-en

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225266

--- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:25:39 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 521724] Review Request: perl-Makefile-DOM - Simple DOM parser for Makefiles

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521724

--- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:28:18 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst & DBIx::Class powered Wiki

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358

--- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:27:38 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 594416] Review Request: json-lib - JSON library for Java

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594416

--- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:30:04 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 461390] Review Request: perl-namespace-clean - Keep your namespace tidy

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461390

--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:26:01 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 470976] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope - Execute code after scope compilation finishes

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470976

--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:26:25 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 498977] Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977

--- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:26:52 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 208004] Review Request: perl-Test-Perl-Critic - Use Perl::Critic in test programs

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208004

--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-07-26 18:25:09 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 604331] Review Request: redshift - Adjusts the color temperature of your screen according to time of day

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604331

Miloš Komarčević  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(miloskomarce...@n |
   |etscape.net)|

--- Comment #5 from Miloš Komarčević  2010-07-26 
17:31:13 EDT ---
Thanks a lot for the feedback Mamoru, and sorry for the brief absence.

(In reply to comment #3)
> * License
>   - As far as I checked the whole source code, the license tag should
> be "GPLv3+".

Done

> * BuildRoot
>   - BuildRoot tag is no longer needed on Fedora:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
> ! Note that on EPEL5 and below BuildRoot tag is still needed.

Will leave it in then in case this ever makes it into EPEL5

> * Naming of gtk subpackage
>   - Normally Fedora names gui related subpackage as "%{name}-gui" or
> "%{name}-gtk", and the former (-gui) is more general if no other
> gui backend (such as qt or so) is provided.

I thought about this already and, unless this is a hard requirement, decided it
was better to have it the same as the name of the binary to avoid confusion.

> * Python related (Build)Requires
>   - Currently your srpm won't build on Fedora 12 because of lacking
> %python_sitelib definition. Please refer to:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#Macros

Done

>   - Please use "python2" or "python3" for (Build)Requires, c.f.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#BuildRequires

Done

> * Dependencies between subpackages
>   - Usually dependencies between binary rpms rebuilt from the same
> srpm must be EVR(Epoch-Version-Release) specific:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package

Done

> * Make build.log more verbose
>   - Currently build.log does not show how linkage on the created binary
> is done:
> --
>183CCLD   redshift
>184  make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/redshift-1.4.1/src'
>185  make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/redshift-1.4.1/src'
> --
> Please add "V=1" to "make %{?_smp_mflags}".

Done

> * Timestamp
>   - Please consider to use
> --
> make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install INSTALL="install -p"
> --
> to keep timestamps on the installed files as much as possible.
> This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent
> autotools.

Done

> * Desktop file
>   - When gui program is installed, the corresponding desktop file must be
> properly installed:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files

gtk-redshift is not an app, but a widget, so there should be no need for a
desktop file


http://kmilos.fedorapeople.org/redshift.spec
http://kmilos.fedorapeople.org/redshift-1.4.1-2.fc13.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 615669] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Cracklib - perl module to interact with libcrack

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615669

--- Comment #10 from Carl Thompson  2010-07-26 17:01:46 
EDT ---
New spec and build tested on koji dist-f13 and dist-rawhide

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 607873] Review Request: OTRS - Open Source Ticket Request System

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607873

--- Comment #1 from Jos Vos  2010-07-26 16:34:36 EDT ---
Various things should probably be improved in this spec file.

All stuff is now installed in /var/www/otrs, which is against current Fedora
guidelines AFAIK (should be /usr/share/otrs, right?).

The installed user "otrs" has /var/www/otrs as home dir, which should probably
be changed to /usr/share/otrs too then.

The data tree contains various files that can be changed.  These should in some
way end up in /etc (or maybe /var/lib/...?).  First guess is to do this with
symlinks, but I didn't try yet (sometimes this doesn't work because an
application looks for other files using the directory name of the real path).

As you might have guessed, I'm also working on improving the old package and
I'm happy to share my suggestions in this bugzilla entry.  I have to add that
I'm packaging OTRS 3.0 beta (now a CVS checkout, a real beta is released on
August 2, 2010), but except that the interface is fully rewritten, packaging is
very similar and can be used for 2.4.7 with very minor changes, AFAICS now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 616120] Review Request: spacecmd - Command-line interface to Spacewalk and Satellite servers

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616120

Maxim Burgerhout  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #7 from Maxim Burgerhout  2010-07-26 15:43:21 EDT 
---
Looks good. Looking forward to using this.


spacecmd was approved by Maxim  Burgerhout d.d. 20100726


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 226225] Merge Review: pam_krb5

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226225

--- Comment #4 from Nalin Dahyabhai  2010-07-26 15:33:30 EDT 
---
Thank you for picking up this review!

(In reply to comment #1)
> 2)timestamps should be preserved.Use INSTALL="install -p" when installing to
> preserve timestamps.

Done.

> 3) I will suggest this package to follow current packaging guidelines and
> remove buildroot, %clean section and cleaning of build root in %install

Okay, done.

> 4) Should follow
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make

Done.

(In reply to comment #3)
> Also,
>  As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags ,
> please add comment in spec why you need extras flags.

I think at the time (and this would have been quite a while ago) libtool wasn't
doing the right thing and building the contents of the module with -fPIC, but
it seems to be doing the right things now.  Removing the CFLAGS tweaks.

The changes are made in upstream git if you'd like to review them:
  http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=pam_krb5.git;a=blob;f=pam_krb5.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 606432] Review Request: ditaa - Diagrams Through Ascii Art

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606432

Terje Røsten  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE

--- Comment #6 from Terje Røsten  2010-07-26 15:23:51 
EDT ---
Sorry for the delay, wanted to wait for upstream fix for bug #607076.

ditaa is now imported, built and pushed for rawhide, F-12 and F-13.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 618354] New: Review Request: cwallpaper - A front end for fbsetbg, Esetroot, feh, and other wallpaper changers

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: cwallpaper - A front end for fbsetbg, Esetroot, feh, 
and other wallpaper changers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618354

   Summary: Review Request: cwallpaper - A front end for fbsetbg,
Esetroot, feh, and other wallpaper changers
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: gra...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/cwallpaper.spec

SRPM: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/cwallpaper-0.3.2-2.fc13.src.rpm

Description:
CWallpaper is a graphical wallpaper changing program designed to be used with
environments such as Fluxbox and Blackbox which lack their own wallpaper
changing programs. It is designed to be compatible with nearly every desktop
environment and root wallpaper changer possible.

Current Features:

 * Compatible with fbsetbg, bsetbg, esetroot, feh.
 * Also has KDE Desktop, Nautilus, and Rox support through shell scripts.
 * MS Windows support, using bsetroot from the Blackbox for Windows project.
 * Thumbnail preview of the wallpaper.
 * Loading different config files from command line.
 * Long wallpaper lists.
 * A GTK and FLTK version.


Koji scratch builds:

F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2351737
F-13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2351789
Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2351874


$ rpmlint {SPECS,SRPMS,RPMS/i686}/cwallpaper*
SPECS/cwallpaper.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fbsetbg -> setback, subset,
besetting
cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) feh -> eh, fee, fen
cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fbsetbg -> setback,
subset, besetting
cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetbg -> subset,
setback, basset
cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US esetroot -> beetroot,
esotropia, restroom
cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US feh -> eh, fee, fen
cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetroot -> beetroot,
betroths, betroth
cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig,
con-fig, configure
cwallpaper.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fbsetbg -> setback, subset,
besetting
cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) feh -> eh, fee, fen
cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fbsetbg -> setback,
subset, besetting
cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetbg -> subset,
setback, basset
cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US esetroot -> beetroot,
esotropia, restroom
cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US feh -> eh, fee, fen
cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetroot -> beetroot,
betroths, betroth
cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig,
con-fig, configure
cwallpaper.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/cwallpaper
cwallpaper.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cwallpaper
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 20 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617400] Review Request: pfHandle - wrapper for tools to manage postfix mail queue

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617400

--- Comment #3 from Carl Thompson  2010-07-26 14:15:01 
EDT ---
New
Spec URL: http://www.red-dragon.com/pfHandle.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.red-dragon.com/pfHandle-1-1.fc13.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 609142] Review Request: felix-main - Apache Felix Main

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609142

--- Comment #6 from Victor G. Vasilyev  2010-07-26 
14:01:02 EDT ---
The fifth release is prepared for review.

Changes:
- R: felix-parent is removed according to the comment 
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615868#c9

Spec URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/felix-main.spec
SRPM URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/felix-main-2.0.5-5.fc14.src.rpm

Successful scratch koji build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2351879

The rpmlint tool shows " 0 errors, 0 warnings" for all RPMs, including src.rpm.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 615868] Review Request: felix-parent - Parent POM file for Apache Felix Specs

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615868

--- Comment #10 from Victor G. Vasilyev  2010-07-26 
13:33:54 EDT ---
Stanislav,

Thanks for explanation. 
I'll remove "Requires: felix-parent" from my felix-main package.

Nevertheless, please note, after installation of a felix-"child" package we
won't have the complete stack of the POMs for the Felix project.
I think, knowledge about , , etc. will be useful
for a user of the felix-"child" package, and installed felix-parent-X.X.X.pom
is the best trusted source for such info.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 596449] Review Request: NetworkManager-openswan - NetworkManager VPN plugin for Openswan (IPsec)

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596449

Chen Lei  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 588482] Review Request: libktorrent - Library providing torrent downloading code

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588482

Chen Lei  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 603311] Review Request: R-caTools - Tools: moving window statistics, gif, base64, roc auc...

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603311

Chen Lei  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 531107] Review Request: perl-SQL-Tokenizer - A Perl package to tokenize SQL, generically

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531107

--- Comment #10 from David Fetter  2010-07-26 13:05:17 EDT ---
Updated to 0.20, the current version, removed Test::More from Requires.  Newest
packages here:

http://fetter.org/~shackle/perl-SQL-Tokenizer.spec
http://fetter.org/~shackle/perl-SQL-Tokenizer-0.20-1.fc12.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 615868] Review Request: felix-parent - Parent POM file for Apache Felix Specs

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615868

--- Comment #9 from Stanislav Ochotnicky  2010-07-26 
12:33:24 EDT ---
Victor: I hope huwang won't mind me answering...Normally you have felix-parent
only as build-requires never Requires. This simplified BRs for rest of felix-X
packages because it was enough for them to BR felix-parent and not all those
maven plugins etc.

But maybe some middle ground would be best..I don't really like tomcat5 being
pulled in.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 609142] Review Request: felix-main - Apache Felix Main

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609142

--- Comment #5 from Victor G. Vasilyev  2010-07-26 
12:22:32 EDT ---
The fourth release is prepared for review.

Changes:
- Use felix-parent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615868
- Remove demap file option from mvn-jpp command

Spec URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/felix-main.spec
SRPM URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/felix-main-2.0.5-4.fc14.src.rpm

Successful scratch koji build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2351437

The rpmlint tool shows " 0 errors, 0 warnings" for all RPMs, including src.rpm.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 607584] Review Request: wordgroupz - A vocabulary building application

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607584

Mamoru Tasaka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka  2010-07-26 
12:15:18 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> But, I didn't get why "Obsoletes" is unneeded. How will the older versions be
> removed then? 

- "# rpm -F" "# rpm -U" "# yum update (upgrade)" all handles this
  just as expected.

For 0.3b-2:

* Unneeded comments / macros in comments
-
wordgroupz.src:13: W: macro-in-comment %{_tmppath}
wordgroupz.src:13: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
wordgroupz.src:13: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
wordgroupz.src:13: W: macro-in-comment %{release}
wordgroupz.src:20: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
-
  - These warnings are raised because macros are used in comment line
without being escaped. Macros are expanded even in comment lines
and this sometimes causes unexpected errors.

Please use %% instead of % in comment lines, or just remove
unneeded comment lines.

* Requires
  - "Requires: gtk" matches none of the packages on Fedora so this
must be removed. Also, "Requires: gtk2" is unneeded 
because pygtk2 requires gtk2.

* desktop file
  - Again as I said in the previous comment, "Application" in "Categories"
item in %_datadir/applications/%name.desktop is redundant and should
be removed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617524] Review Request: tidyp - Clean up and pretty-print HTML/XHTML/XML

2010-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617524

--- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter  2010-07-26 12:11:48 EDT 
---

$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --alldeps --whatrequires libtidy ...
gurlchecker-0:0.10.1-13.fc12.x86_64
konq-plugins-0:4.4.0-3.fc14.x86_64
libtidy-0:0.99.0-20.20091203.fc13.x86_64
libtidy-devel-0:0.99.0-20.20091203.fc13.x86_64
mulk-0:0.4.1-3.fc12.x86_64
perl-HTML-Tidy-0:1.08-7.fc14.x86_64
php-tidy-0:5.3.3-1.fc14.x86_64
python-tidy-0:0.2-7.fc12.noarch
tidy-0:0.99.0-20.20091203.fc13.x86_64

Of those, the the only ones worth caring about are (probably),
gurlchecker
konq-plugins
mulk
php-tidy

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


  1   2   >