[Bug 619328] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Declare - Declarative syntax for Moose
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619328 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2010-07-31 02:34:59 EDT --- Committed (with %check instead of %clean) and built for rawhide and f14; waiting on deps to go stable for other branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619328] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Declare - Declarative syntax for Moose
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619328 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-31 02:31:51 EDT --- perl-MooseX-Declare-0.33-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MooseX-Declare-0.33-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609506] Review Request: gtk2hs-buildtools - Buildtools for gtk2hs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609506 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2010-07-31 02:24:28 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gtk2hs-buildtools New Branches: F-12 F-13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615783] Review Request: liblouisxml - Translate XML files into proper Braille
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615783 Martin Gieseking changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|martin.giesek...@uos.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597597] Review Request: liblouis - A Braille translator and back-translator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597597 Martin Gieseking changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|martin.giesek...@uos.de Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #12 from Martin Gieseking 2010-07-31 01:55:00 EDT --- Hi Lars, I've recently been promoted to sponsor status, and if you're still interested in becoming a member of the packager group, I'm willing to sponsor you. After you've been sponsored you're allowed to formally review and approve new packages submitted by other packagers. Hence, it's important that you're familiar with the packaging guidelines. To acquaint yourself with the review process and to show your (basic) understanding of the guidelines, you should do some informal reviews in the next couple of days. I'll contact you by email for further details. Since you've already submitted liblouisxml, it's not necessary to me to provide another package. However, if you'd like to make another submission, I would do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618137] Review Request: python-TraitsBackendWX - WxPython backend for Traits and TraitsGUI (Pyface)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618137 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||618155 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618155] Review Request: python-SciMath - Scientific and Mathematical calculations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618155 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||618137 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 473348] Review Request: drraw - Web based presentation front-end for RRDtool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473348 Rafael Aquini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com --- Comment #7 from Rafael Aquini 2010-07-30 23:22:41 EDT --- PING It's been more than a year with no progress; This bug should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Rafael Aquini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com --- Comment #32 from Rafael Aquini 2010-07-30 23:18:50 EDT --- PING It's been almost eight months with no progress; This bug should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 Rafael Aquini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com --- Comment #21 from Rafael Aquini 2010-07-30 23:11:58 EDT --- PING It's been almost ten months with no progress; This bug should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 465159] Review Request: tcexam - A Web-based Computer-Based Assessment (CBA) software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465159 Rafael Aquini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com --- Comment #5 from Rafael Aquini 2010-07-30 22:58:27 EDT --- PING It's been almost ten months with no progress; This bug should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 463233] Review Request: ace-console-wui - Web App for Appliance Management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463233 Rafael Aquini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com --- Comment #5 from Rafael Aquini 2010-07-30 22:55:45 EDT --- PING It's been almost ten months with no progress; This bug should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459872] Review Request: asn1c - Free, open source compiler of ASN.1 specifications into C source code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459872 Rafael Aquini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com --- Comment #13 from Rafael Aquini 2010-07-30 22:50:02 EDT --- PING It's been almost ten months with no progress; This bug should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615669] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Cracklib - perl module to interact with libcrack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615669 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-30 20:59:28 EDT --- perl-Crypt-Cracklib-1.5-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-Cracklib-1.5-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615669] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Cracklib - perl module to interact with libcrack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615669 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-30 20:59:33 EDT --- perl-Crypt-Cracklib-1.5-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-Cracklib-1.5-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478659] Review Request: xfce4-screenshooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478659 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 20:53:51 EDT --- GIT done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551857] Review Request: fwsnort - Translates Snort rules into equivalent iptables rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551857 --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 20:54:29 EDT --- GIT done (by process-git-requests). With f14 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478659] Review Request: xfce4-screenshooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478659 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2010-07-30 20:48:39 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: xfce4-screenshooter New Branches: EL-5 EL-6 Owners: cwickert InitialCC: kevin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 610079] Review Request: bindex - Bundle Manifest Header Mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610079 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2010-07-30 20:38:45 EDT --- Koji builds: dist-rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2362693 dist-f14-updates-candidate http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2363734 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551857] Review Request: fwsnort - Translates Snort rules into equivalent iptables rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551857 Guillermo Gómez changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Guillermo Gómez 2010-07-30 20:38:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: fwsnort Short Description: Translates Snort rules into equivalent iptables rules Owners: gomix Branches: F-12 F-13 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551857] Review Request: fwsnort - Translates Snort rules into equivalent iptables rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551857
Dennis Gilmore changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #20 from Dennis Gilmore 2010-07-30 20:07:32 EDT
---
one remaining issue
%fwsnortlogdir needs to be %{fwsnortlogdir}
it can be fixed at import time
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609142] Review Request: felix-main - Apache Felix Main
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609142 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2010-07-30 19:45:22 EDT --- Koji builds: dist-f14-updates-candidate http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2360100 (dist-rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2360148 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617400] Review Request: pfHandle - wrapper for tools to manage postfix mail queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617400 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-30 19:48:34 EDT --- pfHandle-1.1-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfHandle-1.1-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617400] Review Request: pfHandle - wrapper for tools to manage postfix mail queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617400 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-30 19:48:29 EDT --- pfHandle-1.1-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfHandle-1.1-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591415] Review Request: R-timeDate - Rmetrics - chronological and calendarical objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591415 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-30 19:30:06 EDT --- R-timeDate-2120.90-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-timeDate-2120.90-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591415] Review Request: R-timeDate - Rmetrics - chronological and calendarical objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591415 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-30 19:30:13 EDT --- R-timeDate-2120.90-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-timeDate-2120.90-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 610079] Review Request: bindex - Bundle Manifest Header Mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610079 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 19:05:35 EDT --- f14 branch added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619437] Review Request: bm - Rpm package building helper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619437 Terje Røsten changed: What|Removed |Added CC||terje...@phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #6 from Terje Røsten 2010-07-30 18:29:32 EDT --- Hints for Python packages: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python As a start the --record=INSTALLED_FILES trick is not allowed, *.pyo files are not excluded and defattr use seems strange. A link to a koji scratch build would be nice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619928] New: Review Request: tigase-server - Tigase XMPP Server in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tigase-server - Tigase XMPP Server in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619928 Summary: Review Request: tigase-server - Tigase XMPP Server in Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mc...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/tigase-server.spec SRPM URL: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/tigase-server-5.0.0-0.1.20100527svn.src.rpm Description: Tigase is pure Java 1.6.0 XMPP high-performance server based on highly modular design. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609142] Review Request: felix-main - Apache Felix Main
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609142 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 18:47:16 EDT --- f14 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609142] Review Request: felix-main - Apache Felix Main
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609142 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2010-07-30 18:09:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: felix-main Short Description: Apache Felix Main Owners: victorv Branches: F-14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 610079] Review Request: bindex - Bundle Manifest Header Mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610079 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2010-07-30 18:08:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: bindex Short Description: Bundle Manifest Header Mapper Owners: victorv Branches: F-14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565764] Review Request: sugar-measure - Measure functionality for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565764 --- Comment #9 from Sebastian Dziallas 2010-07-30 18:13:17 EDT --- Upstream is now at v31: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-July/025670.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602862] Branch Request: telepathy-filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602862 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Sebastian Dziallas 2010-07-30 17:46:52 EDT --- This is now built for EL-6, thanks! Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Robert Scheck 2010-07-30 17:43:40 EDT --- x509watch-0.2.0-1.el4 Tag: dist-4E-epel-testing-candidate Status: complete x509watch-0.2.0-1.el5 Tag: dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate Status: complete x509watch-0.2.0-1.el6 Tag: dist-6E-epel Status: complete x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc12 Tag: dist-f12-updates-candidate Status: complete x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc13 Tag: dist-f13-updates-candidate Status: complete x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc14 Tag: dist-f14-updates-candidate Status: complete x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc15 Tag: dist-f15 Status: complete -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-30 17:40:28 EDT --- x509watch-0.2.0-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/x509watch-0.2.0-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-30 17:40:22 EDT --- x509watch-0.2.0-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/x509watch-0.2.0-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-30 17:39:56 EDT --- x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-30 17:40:04 EDT --- x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591900] Review Request: libcapifax - Support for Sending/receiving faxes over CAPI capable devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591900 --- Comment #10 from Louis Lagendijk 2010-07-30 17:37:01 EDT --- Hello Felix Thanks for the review! I corrected the issues you mentioned: - removed the cleanup of the buildroot from %install AND %clean - Corrected license. good catch! I don't know how I missed that - Replaced my own fix for the pc file and replaced that with the jmb4 patch New versions of the SRPM and specfiel are available from: http://fazant.net/libcapifax/libcapifax-0.7.3-3.fc12.src.rpm http://fazant.net/libcapifax/libcapifax.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-30 17:40:10 EDT --- x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619518] Review Request: aajohan-comfortaa - Modern style true type font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619518 --- Comment #15 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2010-07-30 17:31:26 EDT --- Updated spec and URL addressing wrong-file-of-line-encoding issue. Spec URL: http://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/aajohan-comfortaa-fonts.specs SRPM URL: http://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-1.003-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619728] Review Request: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0 - openjdk as builded form sources, without test clases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619728 Terje Røsten changed: What|Removed |Added CC||terje...@phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #3 from Terje Røsten 2010-07-30 17:29:44 EDT --- > I suggest you to introduce yourself in java-list, there are some RH employees > working for java related packages and can sponsor you. Why must a RH employee sponsor Jiri? And why is the java list a place to get sponsored? There is a lot of open review requests to work on to show package knowledge. Any way, welcome to Fedora Jiri! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617986] Review Request: cryptkeeper - A Linux system tray applet that manages EncFS encrypted folders
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617986 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-30 17:19:00 EDT --- cryptkeeper-0.9.5-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cryptkeeper-0.9.5-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617986] Review Request: cryptkeeper - A Linux system tray applet that manages EncFS encrypted folders
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617986 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-30 17:18:26 EDT --- cryptkeeper-0.9.5-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cryptkeeper-0.9.5-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617986] Review Request: cryptkeeper - A Linux system tray applet that manages EncFS encrypted folders
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617986 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-30 17:18:54 EDT --- cryptkeeper-0.9.5-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cryptkeeper-0.9.5-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||608575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608575] Review Request: tinymce-spellchecker - TinyMCE spellchecker plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608575 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||481536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618852] Review Request: laughlin-backgrounds - Laughlin desktop backgrounds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618852 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-30 17:15:19 EDT --- goddard-backgrounds-13.0.0-2.fc14,laughlin-backgrounds-13.91.0-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/goddard-backgrounds-13.0.0-2.fc14,laughlin-backgrounds-13.91.0-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||608574 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608574] Review Request: tinymce - Web based Javascript HTML WYSIWYG editor control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608574 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||481536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608575] Review Request: tinymce-spellchecker - TinyMCE spellchecker plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608575 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||608574 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608574] Review Request: tinymce - Web based Javascript HTML WYSIWYG editor control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608574 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||608575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615554] Review Request: minitunes - A better music player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615554 --- Comment #11 from Germán Racca 2010-07-30 17:06:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Below is the full review: > > Minitunes Review > [snip] > Looks pretty good to me, just clarify the License part and it is good to go. > Many thanks for the full review Magnus! I've added the comment you suggested and also I've mailed the author suggesting to add a man page. Please find the updated files here: SPEC: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/minitunes.spec SRPM: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/minitunes-0.1.1-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618451] Review Request: gdb-heap - Extensions to gdb for debugging dynamic memory allocation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-07-30
16:46:31 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> However,
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562980#c3
> suggests that it may be possible to install the loader code to
> /usr/share/gdb/auto-load/lib/ld-%{glibc_version}.so-gdb.py
> instead.
>
> We'd still need a:
> Requires: glibc = %{version}
> to ensure that we're in sync with glibc.
>
> With this, we could be autoloaded provided that the correct glibc is loaded,
> and could issue an error message is glibc-debuginfo not available.
This sounds like the best option I've heard so far.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619025] Review Request: python-dpkt - Simple packet creation/parsing python library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619025 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:38:18 EDT --- GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619328] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Declare - Declarative syntax for Moose
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619328 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:39:55 EDT --- GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619048] Review Request: ailurus - A simple application installer and GNOME tweaker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619048 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:38:56 EDT --- GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:35:40 EDT --- GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). with f14 branch added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618268] Review Request: geronimo-osgi-support - OSGI spec bundle support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618268 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:36:24 EDT --- GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618638] Review Request: perl-Package-DeprecationManager - Manage deprecation warnings for your distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618638 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:37:08 EDT --- GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). with f14 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617986] Review Request: cryptkeeper - A Linux system tray applet that manages EncFS encrypted folders
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617986 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:34:14 EDT --- GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). with f14 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617400] Review Request: pfHandle - wrapper for tools to manage postfix mail queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617400 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:33:09 EDT --- GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). with f14 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618852] Review Request: laughlin-backgrounds - Laughlin desktop backgrounds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618852 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:37:42 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616357] Review Request: spamassassin-FuzzyOcr - Spamassassin plugin to identify image spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616357 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:32:32 EDT --- GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). With f14 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616120] Review Request: spacecmd - Command-line interface to Spacewalk and Satellite servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616120 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:31:02 EDT --- GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). With f14 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615129] Review Request: cjkuni-ukai-fonts - Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Kai face
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615129 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:28:27 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615669] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Cracklib - perl module to interact with libcrack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615669 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:29:32 EDT --- GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). With f14 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615128] Review Request: cjkuni-uming-fonts - Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Ming face
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615128 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:28:02 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618451] Review Request: gdb-heap - Extensions to gdb for debugging dynamic memory allocation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #12 from Dave Malcolm 2010-07-30 16:24:04 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Just to make sure I understand:
> This means that the gdb-heap code will never load unless the .debug file is
> present, right?
That was my understanding.
However,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562980#c3
suggests that it may be possible to install the loader code to
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/lib/ld-%{glibc_version}.so-gdb.py
instead.
We'd still need a:
Requires: glibc = %{version}
to ensure that we're in sync with glibc.
With this, we could be autoloaded provided that the correct glibc is loaded,
and could issue an error message is glibc-debuginfo not available.
> And since we can't guarantee that the glibc-debuginfo package is installed,
> what happens when glibc-debuginfo isn't installed and someone tries to invoke
> the "heap" command?
(gdb) heap
Undefined command: "heap". Try "help".
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 612384] Review Request: teal - Verification utility and connection library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612384 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:26:31 EDT --- GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). With f14 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614329] Review Request: emacs-common-w3m - W3m interface for Emacsen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614329 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:27:12 EDT --- GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). with f14 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 610079] Review Request: bindex - Bundle Manifest Header Mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610079 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:25:36 EDT --- GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573294] Review Request: kadu - An instant messanger compatile with the Gadu-Gadu protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573294 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:22:20 EDT --- This seems to be done via the web interface. Clearing the fedora-cvs flag now. Reset if you need anything further here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609079] Review Request: R-GenomicRanges - Representation and manipulation of genomic intervals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609079 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:24:37 EDT --- GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). Also f14 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591415] Review Request: R-timeDate - Rmetrics - chronological and calendarical objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591415 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:23:09 EDT --- GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609142] Review Request: felix-main - Apache Felix Main
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609142 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:25:01 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565764] Review Request: sugar-measure - Measure functionality for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565764 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:15:06 EDT --- git done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542990] Review Request: root - Numerical data analysis framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542990 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #33 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 16:04:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 519383] Review Request: python-xklavier - Python bindings for libxklavier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519383 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 15:55:19 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 251110] Review Request: perl-IPC-Run3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251110 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 15:53:18 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-30 15:49:52 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619518] Review Request: aajohan-comfortaa - Modern style true type font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619518 --- Comment #14 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2010-07-30 14:58:22 EDT --- Almost but I need to reminder how set a variable that uses string like "Comfortaa FONTLOG.txt" I borrowed the method from ns-bola-fonts but I cannot exactly remember how to declare such variable: chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new[] sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new[] touch -r $txt $txt.new[] mv $txt.new[] $txt Result: + for txt in '*.txt' + fold -s Comfortaa FONTLOG.txt fold: Comfortaa: No such file or directory fold: FONTLOG.txt: No such file or directory + sed -i 's/\r//' Comfortaa FONTLOG.txt.new Should I declare something like $txt[]? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619831] Review Request: ltl2ba - Fast translation from LTL formulas to Büchi automata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619831 --- Comment #1 from David A. Wheeler 2010-07-30 15:01:11 EDT --- FYI, an rpmlint (using 32-bit Fedora 13) produces 0 errors and 5 warnings, and none of the warnings should inhibit distribution. Of the 5 warnings, 4 of them are because the Fedora spellchecker's wordlist does not include the word "automata". Since "automata" is the correct word, those warnings are irrelevant. The other warning complains that there's no manual page. Unfortunately, the upstream package doesn't include a manual page, so I don't have one to package. The program does include a help option, in case that's any consolation. $ rpmlint ltl2ba.spec ../SRPMS/ltl2ba-1.1-1.fc13.src.rpm ../RPMS/i686/ltl2ba-* ltl2ba.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) automata -> automats, automat, automate ltl2ba.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automata -> automats, automat, automate ltl2ba.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) automata -> automats, automat, automate ltl2ba.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automata -> automats, automat, automate ltl2ba.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ltl2ba 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619728] Review Request: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0 - openjdk as builded form sources, without test clases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619728 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||d...@danny.cz Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Dan Horák 2010-07-30 13:22:14 EDT --- java-1.6.0-openjdk is already in the distro, so this review request doesn't make sense. Review request are used for completely new packages. You should talk to your manager about how to get sponsored as a Red Hat employee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619518] Review Request: aajohan-comfortaa - Modern style true type font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619518 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pikachu.2...@gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Mohamed El Morabity 2010-07-30 14:12:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-1.4-3.fc13.noarch.rpm > aajohan-comfortaa-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-1.4/Please read me.txt > aajohan-comfortaa-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-1.4/Comfortaa FONTLOG.txt > aajohan-comfortaa-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-1.4/OFL - Font License.txt > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. > > I am not sure where wrong-file-of-line-encoding come from. Will those impact > packaging process? Those files were maybe written under MS Windows, with non-Unix end-of-lines and so probable incorrect display in terminal for example or whatever under Linux. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding and correct those files in your %prep section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619518] Review Request: aajohan-comfortaa - Modern style true type font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619518 --- Comment #12 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2010-07-30 14:04:00 EDT --- Spec URL: http://luya.fedorapeople.prg/packages/SPECS/aajohan-comfortaa-fonts.specs SRPM URL: http://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-1.003-3.fc13.src.rpm (In reply to comment #11) > 1. There is no need to ask upstream to fix the documentation, as it is already > in the archive. You need to provide these files as part of the package: > > Please read me.txt > Comfortaa FONTLOG.txt > OFL - Font License.txt Added but I received these warnings: $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-1.4-3.fc13.noarch.rpm aajohan-comfortaa-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-1.4/Please read me.txt aajohan-comfortaa-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-1.4/Comfortaa FONTLOG.txt aajohan-comfortaa-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-1.4/OFL - Font License.txt 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. I am not sure where wrong-file-of-line-encoding come from. Will those impact packaging process? > 2. The reason that the original fontconfig was wrong is that it was suggesting > that Comfortaa is the same design as MgOpen Modata, which it is not. That was an attempt but the wiki documentation is not clear so I was stuck with wild guess. With TK009, I settled to generic fontconfig. > 3. Why are you using 1.4 as the version number? The archive has no version > number and the font files themselves are version 1.003. Fixed. I based version number on the Please Readme text -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565764] Review Request: sugar-measure - Measure functionality for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565764 Kedar Sovani changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Kedar Sovani 2010-07-30 13:06:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sugar-measure Short Description: Measure functionality for Sugar Owners: kedars Branches: F-12 F-13 InitialCC: bernie -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583531] Review Request: mozilla-firetray - A system tray addon for mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583531 --- Comment #19 from Kalev Lember 2010-07-30 12:53:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > It would be really nice to have uniform packaging guidelines for Mozilla > > extensions where one could, among other things, get a sample spec file and > > answers to the following questions: > > - how to name the source rpm? > > + we name source rpm according to the spec name. Well, in that case the question is: - how to name the spec file + srpm? > > Hicam, perhaps you could come up with short guidelines and run it through > > Fedora Packaging Committee first? > > This is beyond the scope of this bug, you can open a ticket where appropriate > to discuss that. Adam and you are having a disagreement over the naming here. I'm trying to help you solve the disagreement. One way to do that is for you to come up with short guidelines. You already answered to most of the questions above; copy paste it all together to a wiki page and post it for FPC review. I would be happy to look over the text once you've written a draft. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583531] Review Request: mozilla-firetray - A system tray addon for mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583531 --- Comment #18 from Hicham HAOUARI 2010-07-30 12:37:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #15) > > NO - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines > > FIXME: Package should be named firetray as that is the name of the upstream > > project > > I'd like to point out here that several (all?) existing Mozilla extensions in > Fedora repos have mozilla- prefix: > mozilla-adblockplus.noarch : Adblocking extension for Mozilla Firefox > mozilla-noscript.noarch : JavaScript white list extension for Mozilla Firefox > > It would be really nice to have uniform packaging guidelines for Mozilla > extensions where one could, among other things, get a sample spec file and > answers to the following questions: > - how to name the source rpm? + we name source rpm according to the spec name. > - how to split files between subpackages if the extension works in >several different browsers? For example, should there be a -core >subpackage plus a separate subpackage for each browser? (that's what this >spec is doing) Or, should we have one package which registers the >extension for all browsers? + I think forcing all mozilla applications to use it is just insane. For example, a user might need it for Thunderbird, but not for Firefox. > - how to name subpackages? + The naming scheme that I followed seems rational to me, if you have another suggestion, it is welcome > - should subpackages depend on the programs (Firefox, Thunderbird, etc.) >they are extending? + Yes, because they depend on directories owned by these, and they don't make sense without the appropriate application installed. > > Debian's guidelines are here: http://wiki.debian.org/mozilla-devscripts > They are naming their source package EXTENSIONNAME and binary package as > xul-ext-EXTENSIONNAME I don't think that this naming scheme can be applied in Fedora. > > Hicam, perhaps you could come up with short guidelines and run it through > Fedora Packaging Committee first? This is beyond the scope of this bug, you can open a ticket where appropriate to discuss that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583531] Review Request: mozilla-firetray - A system tray addon for mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583531 --- Comment #17 from Kalev Lember 2010-07-30 12:26:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > NO - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines > FIXME: Package should be named firetray as that is the name of the upstream > project I'd like to point out here that several (all?) existing Mozilla extensions in Fedora repos have mozilla- prefix: mozilla-adblockplus.noarch : Adblocking extension for Mozilla Firefox mozilla-noscript.noarch : JavaScript white list extension for Mozilla Firefox It would be really nice to have uniform packaging guidelines for Mozilla extensions where one could, among other things, get a sample spec file and answers to the following questions: - how to name the source rpm? - how to split files between subpackages if the extension works in several different browsers? For example, should there be a -core subpackage plus a separate subpackage for each browser? (that's what this spec is doing) Or, should we have one package which registers the extension for all browsers? - how to name subpackages? - should subpackages depend on the programs (Firefox, Thunderbird, etc.) they are extending? Debian's guidelines are here: http://wiki.debian.org/mozilla-devscripts They are naming their source package EXTENSIONNAME and binary package as xul-ext-EXTENSIONNAME Hicam, perhaps you could come up with short guidelines and run it through Fedora Packaging Committee first? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619831] New: Review Request: ltl2ba - Fast translation from LTL formulas to Büchi automata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ltl2ba - Fast translation from LTL formulas to Büchi automata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619831 Summary: Review Request: ltl2ba - Fast translation from LTL formulas to Büchi automata Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwhee...@dwheeler.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/SPECS/ltl2ba.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/SRPMS/ltl2ba-1.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Translate from Linear temporal logic (LTL) formulas to Büchi automata. LTL is a type of formal logic that extends formal logic with qualifiers involving time. A Büchi automaton is the extension of a finite state automaton to infinite inputs, and are useful for specifying behavior of non-terminating systems (such as hardware or operating systems). A Büchi automaton accepts an infinite input sequence if and only if there exists a run of the automaton which visits at least one of the final states infinitely often. The implementation is based on the translation algorithm by Gastin and Oddoux, presented at the CAV Conference, held in 2001, Paris, France 2001. This package is a useful extension for Frama-C. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619437] Review Request: bm - Rpm package building helper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619437 --- Comment #5 from Randall "Randy" Berry 2010-07-30 12:19:51 EDT --- José, By all means feel free to take the reins. I'm not that familiar with packaging python (yet) so I'll just sit back and observe. My comments were just things I noticed as a passer by. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583531] Review Request: mozilla-firetray - A system tray addon for mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583531 --- Comment #16 from Hicham HAOUARI 2010-07-30 12:15:27 EDT --- as you can see in comment 1, i was using firetray as a name, but others suggested that it should be named mozilla-firetray like mozilla-adblockplus and mozilla-noscript. for the rpmlint output, i don't think it is possible to remove it, because all solutions generate warnings : - If i only add mozilla-firetray-core as a dep, rpmlint complains about dangling symlinks in mozilla-firetray- - If I provide the files in mozilla-firetray-core and require them in mozilla-firetray-, I get a non versioned provides. - If I version the provides, I get a warning that files provides shouldn't be versioned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611454] Review Request: python-bcrypt - Python bindings for OpenBSD's Blowfish password hashing code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611454 --- Comment #6 from David Riches 2010-07-30 12:17:39 EDT --- Thanks very much for the feedback (first package submitted) I have made the alterations suggested. Thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611454] Review Request: python-bcrypt - Python bindings for OpenBSD's Blowfish password hashing code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611454
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Spura 2010-07-30
12:01:10 EDT ---
Some other comments:
- Please use the script from:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
and not just %{!?python_sitearch:}
- Properly indentation helps to read the spec file. :)
- Vendor is still there.
- Requires: python is added automatically
- You explicitely own %{python_sitearch}/, which is not what you want.
You want %{python_sitearch}/* instead.
But it would be far better if you'd use something like
%{python_sitearch}/%{name}
%{python_sitearch}/%{name}-egg-info
so you know, when the egg couldn't get build (just typed it in here, untested).
- Is there a specific reason, why you use "%defattr(-, root, root, 0755)" and
not just %defattr(-,root,root,-) ?
If not, please change it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583531] Review Request: mozilla-firetray - A system tray addon for mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583531
--- Comment #15 from Adam Miller 2010-07-30
11:53:45 EDT ---
NO - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
FIXME: Package should be named firetray as that is the name of the upstream
project
YES - Spec file matches base package name.
YES - Spec has consistant macro usage.
- Meets Packaging Guidelines.
YES - License
YES - License field in spec matches
YES - License file included in package
YES - Spec in American English
YES - Spec is legible.
NO - Sources match upstream md5sum: Invalid Source0 URL
Source0:
http://%{upname}.googlecode.com/files/%{upname}-%{version}-src.zip
NA - Package needs ExcludeArch
YES - BuildRequires correct
NA - Spec handles locales/find_lang
NA - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
YES - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
YES - Package has a correct %clean section.
YES - Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
YES - Package is code or permissible content.
NA - Doc subpackage needed/used.
YES - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
NA - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
NA - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
NA - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
NA - .so files in -devel subpackage.
NA- -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
NA - .la files are removed.
NA - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
YES - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
YES - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
YES - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
YES - Package owns all the directories it creates.
NO - No rpmlint output.
[10:49:31][a...@turnip][specs]+ rpmlint
../SRPMS/mozilla-firetray-0.2.8-1.fc13.src.rpm
mozilla-firetray.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) addon -> ad don, ad-don,
add on
mozilla-firetray.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US addon -> ad don,
ad-don, add on
mozilla-firetray.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US firefox ->
Firefox, firebox, fire fox
mozilla-firetray.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US thunderbird ->
Thunderbird, thunder bird, thunder-bird
mozilla-firetray.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iconified ->
personified, iconicity, nonunified
mozilla-firetray.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US deiconify ->
deification, personify, Delmonico
mozilla-firetray.src:79: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
%{_libdir}/%{name}-%{version}
mozilla-firetray.src:80: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
%{_libdir}/%{name}-%{version}/License.txt
mozilla-firetray.src:81: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
%{_libdir}/%{name}-%{version}/defaults
mozilla-firetray.src:82: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-core-%{version}/ChangeLog
mozilla-firetray.src:83: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
%{_libdir}/%{name}-%{version}/install.rdf
mozilla-firetray.src:84: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
%{_libdir}/%{name}-%{version}/chrome
mozilla-firetray.src:85: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
%{_libdir}/%{name}-%{version}/chrome.manifest
mozilla-firetray.src:86: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
%{_libdir}/%{name}-%{version}/components/nsITray.xpt
mozilla-firetray.src:87: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
%{_libdir}/%{name}-%{version}/components/nsMinimize.js
mozilla-firetray.src:88: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
%{_libdir}/%{name}-%{version}/components/nsIMinimize.xpt
mozilla-firetray.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://firetray.googlecode.com/files/firetray-0.2.8-src.zip HTTP Error 404: Not
Found
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 17 warnings.
YES - final provides and requires are sane:
(include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =;
rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done
manually indented after checking each line. I also remove the rpmlib junk and
anything provided by glibc.)
[10:50:36][a...@turnip][result]+ for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides
$i; echo =; rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done
mozilla-firetray-0.2.8-1.fc13.src.rpm
=
xulrunner-devel
scons
zip
unzip
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
mozilla-firetray-chatzilla-0.2.8-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
mozilla-firetray-chatzilla = 0.2.8-1.fc13
mozilla-firetray-chatzilla(x86-64) = 0.2.8-1.fc13
=
/usr/lib64/mozilla-firetray-0.2.8/License.txt
/usr/lib64/mozilla-firetray-0.2.8/chrome
/usr/lib64/mozilla-firetray-0.2.8/chrome.manifest
/usr/lib64/mozilla-firetray-0.2.8/components/nsIMinimize.xpt
/usr/lib64/mozilla-firetray-0.2.8/components/nsITray.xpt
/usr/lib64/mozilla-firetray-0.2.8/components/nsMinimize.js
/usr/lib64/mozilla-firetray-0.2.8/defaults
/usr/lib64/mozilla-firetray-0.2.8/install.rdf
/usr/share/doc/mozilla-firetray-core-0.2.8/ChangeLog
chatzilla
mozilla-firetray-core = 0.2.8
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDiges
[Bug 619383] Review Request: gsettings-desktop-schemas - A collection of GSettings schemas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619383
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-07-30
11:53:45 EDT ---
Some notes:
* EVR
- For versioning, please use "0.0.1-Y.git%{?dist}"
as described in the below (this versioning method is much
safer)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages
* BuildRoot
- is no longer used on Fedora (EPEL5 and below still uses, however I
don't think this package will be imported there)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
* noarch handling
- Maybe you want to use "%configure --libdir=%{_datadir}".
* Timestamps
- Please consider to use
---
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"
---
to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible.
This method usually works on Makefiles generated by recent
autotools.
* %clean
- %clean section is no longer needed on Fedora 13 and above
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean
(and I think this pakage is needed only for F-14+).
* %postun, %posttrans
- Maybe this is better?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2010-May/007065.html
(I don't know the current status of packaging guideline proposal
about gsettings)
By the way Requires(postun) or so is needed for this?
* Directory ownership issue
- %{_datadir}/glib-2.0/schemas/ is owned by glib2 and
it seems "Requires: glib2 (>= 2.25.x)" is needed for main
package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542990] Review Request: root - Numerical data analysis framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542990 --- Comment #32 from Chen Lei 2010-07-30 11:46:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > (In reply to comment #28) > > root fails to build on ppc64, but upstream claims root support ppc64. It'll > > be > > better to report this problem to upstream. > The failing build on ppc64 has already been reported upstream at the specific > request of the reviewer (see comment #24). > Upstream makes no claim that ppc64 works. On the contrary they claim they will > not fix the ppc64 build and they suggest doing a 32 bit build on ppc64. > https://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/index.php?70542 It's stange, linux/ppc64 is listed under Supported Architectures. See http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/supported-architectures -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542990] Review Request: root - Numerical data analysis framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542990 Mattias Ellert changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #31 from Mattias Ellert 2010-07-30 11:34:19 EDT --- Thank you for the review, Steve! It was a challenge New Package CVS Request === Package Name: root Short Description: Numerical data analysis framework Owners: ellert Branches: F-12 F-13 F-14 EL-5 EL-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
