[Bug 567094] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat suite aimed at gamers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094 Bug 567094 depends on bug 593238, which changed state. Bug 593238 Summary: Please drop dependency on redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593238 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620112] New: Review Request: udpxy - UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: udpxy - UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620112 Summary: Review Request: udpxy - UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alekc...@googlemail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/udpxy/udpxy.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/udpxy/udpxy-1.0.16-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: udpxy is a UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon: it forwards UDP traffic from a given multicast subscription to the requesting HTTP client. $ rpmlint udpxy-1.0.16-1.fc13.i686.rpm udpxy-1.0.16-1.fc13.src.rpm udpxy-1.0.16-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm udpxy-debuginfo-1.0.16-1.fc13.i686.rpm udpxy-debuginfo-1.0.16-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm udpxy.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multicast -> Multics, multicolor, multichannel udpxy.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multicast -> Multics, multicolor, multichannel udpxy.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary udpxrec udpxy.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary udpxy udpxy.i686: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/udpxy udpxy.i686: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/udpxy udpxy.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multicast -> Multics, multicolor, multichannel udpxy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multicast -> Multics, multicolor, multichannel udpxy.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multicast -> Multics, multicolor, multichannel udpxy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multicast -> Multics, multicolor, multichannel udpxy.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary udpxrec udpxy.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary udpxy udpxy.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/udpxy udpxy.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/udpxy 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 477948] Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477948 Julian Aloofi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616292] Review Request: pekwm-themes - Pekwm themes collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616292 --- Comment #2 from Germán Racca 2010-07-31 19:08:00 EDT --- Thanks Christoph! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561462] Review Request: jaffl - Java Abstracted Foreign Function Layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561462 Andrew Haley changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@redhat.com Bug 561462 depends on bug 561456, which changed state. Bug 561456 Summary: Review Request: jnr-x86asm - Pure-java port of asmjit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561456 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615554] Review Request: minitunes - A better music player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615554 Germán Racca changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Germán Racca 2010-07-31 18:31:44 EDT --- Thank you very much Magnus! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: minitunes Short Description: A better music player Owners: skytux Branches: F-12 F-13 F-14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617942] Review Request: geronimo-saaj - Java EE: SOAP with Attachments API Package v1.3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617942 Bug 617942 depends on bug 618268, which changed state. Bug 618268 Summary: Review Request: geronimo-osgi-support - OSGI spec bundle support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618268 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617943] Review Request: geronimo-jaxrpc - Java EE: Java API for XML Remote Procedure Call v1.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617943 Bug 617943 depends on bug 618268, which changed state. Bug 618268 Summary: Review Request: geronimo-osgi-support - OSGI spec bundle support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618268 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618268] Review Request: geronimo-osgi-support - OSGI spec bundle support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618268 Chris Spike changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Chris Spike 2010-07-31 18:21:29 EDT --- Package built, closing. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=187497 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616250] Review Request: geronimo-ejb - Java EE: EJB API v3.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616250 Bug 616250 depends on bug 618268, which changed state. Bug 618268 Summary: Review Request: geronimo-osgi-support - OSGI spec bundle support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618268 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596138] Review Request: NSS-GUI - A graphical user interface for NSS security databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596138 Kai Engert (kaie) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(nott...@redhat.co ||m) --- Comment #8 from Kai Engert (kaie) 2010-07-31 16:23:25 EDT --- No feedback within the last 2 months, did we miss Fedora 14 inclusion? If I understand correctly, the complaint's were about properties of the implementation of the nss-gui tool, but is that a blocker for Fedora inclusion? If I understand correctly, this bug is about reviewing the packaging, not the software itself? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 471805] Review Request: aespipe - AES-based encryption tool for tar/cpio and loop-aes images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471805 Kai Engert (kaie) changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC||keng...@redhat.com Resolution|WONTFIX | AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|keng...@redhat.com --- Comment #13 from Kai Engert (kaie) 2010-07-31 16:19:08 EDT --- Reopening. I see a new release http://loop-aes.sourceforge.net/aespipe/aespipe-v2.4b.tar.bz2 I fixed the whitespace warning and uploaded http://kuix.de/fedora/aespipe/aespipe-2.4b-1.fc13.src.rpm I built it, and no longer get any executable stack warnings. $ rpmlint aespipe-2.4b-1.fc13.i686.rpm aespipe.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cpio -> CPI, Scipio, campion aespipe.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) aes -> eyes, sea, ae aespipe.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpio -> CPI, Scipio, campion aespipe.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US loopback -> loop back, loop-back, loophole aespipe.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.3e-4 ['2.4b-1.fc13', '2.4b-1'] aespipe.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bz2aespipe 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. http://kuix.de/fedora/aespipe/aespipe-2.4b-1.fc13.i686.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 --- Comment #25 from John Lewis 2010-07-31 15:19:55 EDT --- I never got a response from the SpringSource guys. Maybe if someone from RedHat directly contacted them? If someone wants to do that, email me and I'll help you get hold of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619395] Review Request: mozc - Opensourced Google Japanese Input
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619395 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-07-31 14:52:26 EDT --- By the way I don't know if you want to import this also into F-12, however compile on F-12 ppc64 met with segv: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2369262 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619395] Review Request: mozc - Opensourced Google Japanese Input
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619395 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-07-31 14:48:40 EDT --- First of all would you clarify the following? ./data/dictionary/README.txt - Well, mozc says the overall license is BSD, however - this file (./data/dictionary/README.txt) says that the volaburaly set is taken from ipadic, and the license of ipadic is not the same as BSD. ! Fedora admits that the license of ipadic is free, however is different from BSD at least in that the compatibility with GPL is currently unclear: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing - Also some other words seems added to the dictionary in the tarball. Maybe newly added words are licensed under BSD, however it seems unclear to me. Would you check under what license the dictionaries in mozc are actually licensed? ./third_party/rx/v1_0rc2/README - This is under ASL 2.0. ! By the way, there are two third-party products included in mozc tarball (gyp, rx). Generally using bundled libraries is discouraged on Fedora and it is recommended to seperate such bundled libraries https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Bundling_of_multiple_projects Would you create seperated review request for these (if these are really needed)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542990] Review Request: root - Numerical data analysis framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542990 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-31 14:44:08 EDT --- root-5.26.00c-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/root-5.26.00c-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542990] Review Request: root - Numerical data analysis framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542990 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-31 14:44:14 EDT --- root-5.26.00c-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/root-5.26.00c-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542990] Review Request: root - Numerical data analysis framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542990 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-31 14:44:21 EDT --- root-5.26.00c-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/root-5.26.00c-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620042] Review Request: dvdbackup - Command line tool for ripping video DVDs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620042
manuel wolfshant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2010-07-31
14:37:09 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM:
dvdbackup.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
binary RPM:empty
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Actual license type: GPLv3+
License file per spec file: GPLv3
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[!] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of source file from SF: d40b738917cac62a46405f6566a66359504f9a73
dvdbackup-0.4.1.tar.bz2
SHA1SUM of file included in the src.rpm:
6e0a1c77753160e0e02f48954ac9c4af2ff17433 dvdbackup-0.4.1.tar.bz2
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Final provides and requires are sane.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: koji scratch build for rawhide
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2369438
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: all archs suported by koji scratch build
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[x] %check is present and the test passes.
=== Issues ===
1. The licenses specified by the sources are GPLv3+ (and LGPL), not GPLv3
[wo...@wolfy reviews]$ licensecheck /tmp/dvdbackup-0.4.1/*
/tmp/dvdbackup-0.4.1/src/main.c: GPL (v3 or later)
/tmp/dvdbackup-0.4.1/src/dvdbackup.c: GPL (v3 or later)
/tmp/dvdbackup-0.4.1/src/gettext.h: LGPL
/tmp/dvdbackup-0.4.1/src/dvdbackup.h: GPL (v3 or later)
2. The tar.bz2 included in the src.rpm is not identical to the one downloaded
with spectool
=== Final Notes ===
You get bonus karma points if you patch the application to compile for EL-6.
Now it fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2369425
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
[Bug 619928] Review Request: tigase-server - Tigase XMPP Server in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619928 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lkund...@v3.sk AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lkund...@v3.sk Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-07-31 13:08:54 EDT --- The tigase-utils dependency does not seem to be available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609518] Review Request: ghc-glib - Haskell GLib binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609518 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||ready -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620046] New: Review Request: ghc-terminfo - Haskell terminfo binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-terminfo - Haskell terminfo binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620046 Summary: Review Request: ghc-terminfo - Haskell terminfo binding Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-terminfo/ghc-terminfo.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-terminfo/ghc-terminfo-0.3.1.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Haskell bindings to the terminfo library. This package is actually quite tricky to build on fedora because our ncurses linker script breaks the build. It is also used by Yi for example so I think good to include it now in fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620046] Review Request: ghc-terminfo - Haskell terminfo binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620046 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||ready -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615577] Review Request: opencc - A library for conversion between traditional and simplified Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615577 --- Comment #9 from Chia-Pao Kuo 2010-07-31 12:08:05 EDT --- Koji https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2368999 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619991] Review Request: ghc-text - Haskell efficient packed Unicode text type
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619991 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||ready -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620042] New: Review Request: dvdbackup - Command line tool for ripping video DVDs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dvdbackup - Command line tool for ripping video DVDs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620042 Summary: Review Request: dvdbackup - Command line tool for ripping video DVDs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: byvoid@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.byvoid.com/application/dvdbackup/dvdbackup.spec SRPM URL: http://www.byvoid.com/application/dvdbackup/dvdbackup-0.4.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: dvdbackup is a tool to rip video DVDs from the command line. It has the advantages of being small, fast, and easy to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615554] Review Request: minitunes - A better music player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615554 Magnus Tuominen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Magnus Tuominen 2010-07-31 11:16:49 EDT --- Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620039] New: Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039 Summary: Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: supercyp...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: The Enable project provides two related multi-platform packages for drawing GUI objects. * Enable: An object drawing library that supports containment and event notification. * Kiva: A multi-platform DisplayPDF vector drawing engine. Links: SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/python-Enable-3.3.1-1.fc13.src.rpm SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/python-Enable.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604331] Review Request: redshift - Adjusts the color temperature of your screen according to time of day
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604331 --- Comment #8 from Miloš Komarčević 2010-07-31 10:49:41 EDT --- Thanks, shebangs reported upstream: https://bugs.launchpad.net/redshift/+bug/611424 Will probably wait for 1.5 (around the corner supposedly) instead of patching right now. In the meantime, I'll try to get an unofficial pre-review under my belt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608069] Review Request: tango - standard library for D language of d1 specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608069 --- Comment #34 from MERCIER Jonathan 2010-07-31 10:13:43 EDT --- Chen Lei (sorry) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608069] Review Request: tango - standard library for D language of d1 specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608069 --- Comment #33 from MERCIER Jonathan 2010-07-31 10:13:01 EDT --- hello, chean lei can you finish this release please, this is very important. Alpha freeze is already do and this last feature is not done. this review need be done this week or monday. Please thanks for all best regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590244] Review Request: pinta - Simple Paint Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590244
--- Comment #11 from Andrea Musuruane 2010-07-31 09:27:23
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I fixed all problems, hope thats fine now:
> http://palango.fedorapeople.org/pinta/pinta.spec
> http://palango.fedorapeople.org/pinta/pinta-0.4-2.fc13.src.rpm
* This SRPM has not the above SPEC file in it.
* If I use the above SPEC file instead, the build will fail because your patch
for fixing the mime types in the desktop file is wrong.
The problem in the desktop file is that there is a semicolon missing at the end
of the entry "...;image/openraster" -> "...;image/openraster;". You removed all
the semicolons instead.
* Moreover your patches should have the package name in it. Usually something
like pinta-0.4-desktop-file-mime-list.patch or
pinta-desktop-file-mime-list.patch.
* After fixing the above bug and installing the rpm I hit another problem. The
/usr/bin/pinta file has the following content:
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/bin/mono /usr/lib/pinta/Pinta.exe "$@"
As you can see there is not way that this will work on 64 bits architectures
because they use lib64 instead of lib. Please fix this issue in %prep.
* %define installdir %{_libdir} is not needed and must be removed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 612719] Review Request: recoll - Desktop full text search tool with a qt gui
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612719 --- Comment #15 from Ankur Sinha 2010-07-31 08:50:58 EDT --- Okay, Builds with mock. I do recall some discussion about the code reuse, Jean, can you please update us on it? Do we need a FESCO exception etc. here? If not, I'll approve the package. Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 Dave Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalc...@redhat.com --- Comment #20 from Dave Malcolm 2010-07-31 07:50:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > I asked this, because if this package is not retired, we will need to rebuild > it for python-2.7. Please answer asap. Thanks. I've opened bug 620014 for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620000] New: Review Request: hatari - An Atari ST emulator suitable for playing games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hatari - An Atari ST emulator suitable for playing games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=62 Summary: Review Request: hatari - An Atari ST emulator suitable for playing games Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: musur...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/hatari.spec SRPM URL: http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/hatari-1.4.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Hatari is an emulator for the Atari ST, STE, TT and Falcon computers. More precisely, it is an adaption of the WinSTon source code to Linux, using the UAE CPU core instead of the original, non-portable assembler CPU core. The Atari ST was a 16/32 bit computer system which was first released by Atari in 1985. Using the Motorola 68000 CPU, it was a very popular computer having quite a lot of CPU power at that time. Unlike many other Atari ST emulators which try to give you a good environment for running GEM applications, Hatari tries to emulate the hardware of a ST as close as possible so that it is able to run most of the old ST games and demos. I am the current hatari maintainer. I ask a re-review as discussed in fedora-devel because: * Hatari 1.4.0 drops the old build system based on autotools and now it only support cmake. * An (optional) python GUI is now bundled with the emulator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619593] Review Request: topgit - A different patch queue manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619593
Lameire Alexis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexisis-pristont...@hotmai
||l.com
--- Comment #1 from Lameire Alexis
2010-07-31 05:51:32 EDT ---
Hi,
since I'm not sponsored, this informal eview is not official.
-> rpmlint is ok
$ rpmlint topgit-0.8-1.git5aed7e7b.fc13.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
I have checked the spec file, it looks quite good
[ok] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
.
[ok] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
[ok] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
[ok] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
[ok] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license. [3]
[ok] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4]
[ok] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
[ok] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
[ok] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
[ok] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture. [7]
[ok] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8]
[ok] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[ok] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using
the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9]
[ok] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11]
[ok] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker. [12]
[ok] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory. [13]
[ok] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)[14]
[ok] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line. [15]
[ok] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16]
[ok] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17]
[ok] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18]
[ok] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must
run properly if it is not present. [18]
[ok] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need
a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation.
[22]
[ok] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed
should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This
means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with
any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you
feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another
package owns, then please present that at package review time. [23]
[ok
[Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 --- Comment #24 from Sandro Mathys 2010-07-31 05:18:55 EDT --- So is anyone still working on this and seeing any type of progress? If not I'm going to close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615577] Review Request: opencc - A library for conversion between traditional and simplified Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615577 --- Comment #8 from Chia-Pao Kuo 2010-07-31 04:28:56 EDT --- spec & new upstream release Spec URL: http://www.byvoid.com/application/opencc/download/opencc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.byvoid.com/application/opencc/download/opencc-0.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619991] New: Review Request: ghc-text - Haskell efficient packed Unicode text type
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-text - Haskell efficient packed Unicode text type https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619991 Summary: Review Request: ghc-text - Haskell efficient packed Unicode text type Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-text/ghc-text.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-text/ghc-text-0.7.2.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: text: An efficient packed Unicode text type This library is needed by darcs-2.5 which is currently in beta. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581104] Review Request: lv2-EQ10Q-plugins - Parametric equalizer lv2 plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581104 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-31 03:52:39 EDT --- lv2-EQ10Q-plugins-1.0-7.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2-EQ10Q-plugins-1.0-7.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619025] Review Request: python-dpkt - Simple packet creation/parsing python library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619025 Yanko Kaneti changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Yanko Kaneti 2010-07-31 03:23:41 EDT --- Imported in git. f14 build done and submitted via bodhi. dpkt retired and request for blocking on f14 and rawhide sent. I'll wait and see if inheritance takes care of the f14 package ending in rawhide, will build if it doesn't. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
