[Bug 578480] Review Request: spectrum - XMPP transport/gateway
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480 --- Comment #60 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 02:05:37 EDT --- spectrum-1.4.0-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spectrum-1.4.0-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622002] Review Request: emacs-rinari - Ruby on rails minor mode for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622002
--- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan 2010-08-13 01:41:38
EDT ---
#001: In "Summary:", for nouns, please use "Ruby on Rails" and "Emacs".
#002: For your comments, please give a newline above and below, and give a
white-space after '#' as in:
# The source of this package was pulled from upstream's vcs.
# use the following command to generate the tar ball:
The .spec file must be readable.
#003: As per the GNU Emacs template please use:
%global pkg foo
%global pkgname Foo
#004: Source0 should point to a URL that is available for download. Please
upload the same sources that you used for packaging at your fedorapeople.org
website, and mention the URL.
#005: Use the following:
%{__rm}
%{__install}
#006: In emacs-rinari-init.el, please don't include ido-mode, since, it is only
recommended and not required. We don't need to force it on the end user. Just
use:
;; Init file for rinari plugin
(add-to-list 'load-path "/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/rinari/")
(require 'rinari)
I have tested the package, and it works.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561462] Review Request: jaffl - Java Abstracted Foreign Function Layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561462 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akurt...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-08-13 01:32:53 EDT --- I would like to review this one but it would be good to be updated to latest verstion http://github.com/wmeissner/jaffl/tarball/0.5.4 before that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619928] Review Request: tigase-server - Tigase XMPP Server in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619928 Matej Cepl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Matej Cepl 2010-08-13 00:21:53 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: tigase-server Short Description: Tigase XMPP Server in Java Owners: mcepl Branches: f13 f14 el6 el5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532490] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-extra - Extra sounds for Asterisk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532490 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2010-08-12 22:13:16 EDT --- Updated to the latest release: Spec URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/asterisk-sounds-extra.spec SRPM URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/asterisk-sounds-extra-1.4.11-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508316] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber plugin for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 Arun SAG changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508316] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber plugin for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 --- Comment #9 from Arun SAG 2010-08-12 22:12:06 EDT --- Please update this package. I will do the review this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623871] Review Request: flies-Python-client-client and library for working Flies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623871 James Ni changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623871] New: Review Request: flies-Python-client-client and library for working Flies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: flies-Python-client-client and library for working Flies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623871 Summary: Review Request: flies-Python-client-client and library for working Flies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jamesni.fedorapeople.org/flies-python-client/flies-python-client.spec SRPM URL: http://jamesni.fedorapeople.org/flies-python-client/flies-python-client-0.0.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Hi, I just finished the packaging flies-python-client, I would appreciate a sponsor and review so that i can get it into Fedora Extras Flies Python client is a client that working with Flies server for creating project and iteration, retrieving info of all the projects on Flies server, retrieving info of single project or single iteration. It also provide functions for pushing or pulling the publican files from/to Flies server. Flies Python client also include a library which provide basic operations for communicating with Flies server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 --- Comment #1 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2010-08-12 21:29:15 EDT --- Koji build scratch result: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2398807 $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/abattis-cantarell-fonts-1.001-1.fc13.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] New: Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 Summary: Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: l...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/abattis-cantarell-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/abattis-cantarell-fonts-1.001-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Cantarell is a contemporary Humanist sans serif that fully support the following writing systems: Basic Latin, Western European, Catalan, Baltic, Turkish, Central European, Dutch and Afrikaans. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226547] Merge Review: x86info
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226547 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-08-12 21:08:00 EDT --- Sorry, until we come up with some different policy for merge reviews, they should stay open until finished. Parag is willing to help commit the cleanups and get this through review if thats ok with the owner(s). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619462] Review Request: tyrion - A framework for systems automation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619462 --- Comment #14 from Silas Sewell 2010-08-12 21:00:33 EDT --- Issues should be fixed: http://github.com/silas/rpms/commit/925a04b0da3d1f0fcce9952384115a64eb4a5da4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #83 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-08-12 18:43:20 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #82 from Tim Fenn 2010-08-12 18:22:42 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: coot New Branches: el6 Owners: timfenn InitialCC: timfenn All the dependencies are available for EL6, they just need to be tagged/built, so I'd like to add the el6 branch as well for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 Tim Fenn changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611476] Review Request: dhcp_probe - Tool for discover DHCP and BootP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611476 --- Comment #9 from Daniel Bruno 2010-08-12 15:38:55 EDT --- I'm working on this package now. SPEC URL: http://dbruno.fedorapeople.org/dhcp_probe/dhcp_probe.spec SRPM URL: http://dbruno.fedorapeople.org/dhcp_probe/dhcp_probe-1.3.0-2.fc13.src.rpm rpmlint -i rpmbuild/SPECS/dhcp_probe.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611476] Review Request: dhcp_probe - Tool for discover DHCP and BootP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611476 --- Comment #10 from Randall "Randy" Berry 2010-08-12 16:05:02 EDT --- I believe at this point in the game since it has changed owners it would be easier just to close this bug and start another under the new owners account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596461] Review Request: lzma - SDK for lzma compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla 2010-08-12 16:04:45 EDT --- Interesting thing. Just saw put 2 and 2 together, and did some digging. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/SevenZip This is recently orphaned, and uses the same tarball I use in lzma-sdk. It only ships the Java bits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618451] Review Request: gdb-heap - Extensions to gdb for debugging dynamic memory allocation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-12 16:26:40 EDT --- gdb-heap-0.5-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdb-heap-0.5-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619012] Review Request: cagibi - SSDP (UPnP discovery) cache/proxy daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619012 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-12 16:01:36 EDT --- cagibi-0.1.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cagibi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cagibi-0.1.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569833] Review Request: drupal6 - An open-source content-management platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569833 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net | |) | --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla 2010-08-12 15:58:00 EDT --- Sorry for the delays, life and all. I also deliberated on the merits of Plan Frields vs. Plan Nalley for a bit too long. After much internal bikeshedding, here's an updated version, implementing Plan Frields. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6/drupal6.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6/drupal6-6.19-1.fc13.src.rpm I hate packaging webapps. But someone has to. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601577] Review Request: liblockfile - This library implements a number of functions found in -lmail on SysV systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601577 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-12 15:56:23 EDT --- liblockfile-1.08-9.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update liblockfile'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/liblockfile-1.08-9.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596461] Review Request: lzma - SDK for lzma compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla 2010-08-12 16:14:38 EDT --- Only Frinika uses it, also orphaned. I could take both, convert SevenZip to provide everything in a way that Frinika can use, and use it for UPX also, and drop this review. Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622946] Review Request: rubygem-bcrypt-ruby - Wrapper Around bcrypt() password hashing algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622946
--- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-08-12
15:46:51 EDT ---
Some notes:
* %define -> %global
- Now we prefer to use %global instead of %define:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define
* License
- Almost all files are under 4 clause BSD, except that
./ext/jruby/bcrypt_jruby/BCrypt.java
is under MIT.
The license tag should be "BSD with advertising and MIT".
* BuildRoot
- BuildRoot tag is no longer needed on Fedora and EPEL6:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
* Make build log more verbose
- Please add "-V" option to "gem install" so that we can check if Fedora
specific
compilation flags are correctly honored from build.log.
* Arch dependent files / C source codes / etc handling
- .c / .h source codes, Makefile, extconf.rb are all needed for creating .so
file and
should not be needed on runtime.
- i.e. %geminstdir/ext/mri should be removed.
- .o files are needed for creating .so file and should not be installed in
binary
rpm (i.e. please remove %ruby_sitearch/%gemname/*.o ) (also see below)
- %{geminstdir}/lib/*.so symlink should not be needed (putting "real" .so
files
under %ruby_sitearch should be enough) (also see below)
- %{geminstdir}/lib/bcrypt.rb is really needed and not %doc.
- bcrypt_ext.so must be under %ruby_sitearch, not under
%ruby_sitearch/%gemname
(lib/bcrypt.so reads:
---
6 else
7$LOAD_PATH.unshift(File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__),
"..", "ext", "mri")))
8require "bcrypt_ext"
9require "openssl"
10 end
---
So bcrypt_ext.so must be under ruby default search path (i.e ruby -e 'puts
$:').
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622979] Review Request: libassuan1 - GnuPG IPC v1 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622979 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-12 15:49:20 EDT --- kdepim-4.4.5-2.fc14, opensc-0.11.13-3.fc14, gpa-0.9.0-1.fc14, libassuan1-1.0.5-5.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kdepim opensc gpa libassuan1'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kdepim-4.4.5-2.fc14,opensc-0.11.13-3.fc14,gpa-0.9.0-1.fc14,libassuan1-1.0.5-5.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611476] Review Request: dhcp_probe - Tool for discover DHCP and BootP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611476 Juan Manuel Rodriguez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC||nus...@fedoraproject.org Resolution|DEFERRED| --- Comment #8 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2010-08-12 15:22:51 EDT --- I'm opening the ticket because Daniel Bruno wants to work on it. He'll post the SPEC/SRPM to the package, and I'll continue the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611476] Review Request: dhcp_probe - Tool for discover DHCP and BootP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611476 Juan Manuel Rodriguez changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nus...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 621017] Review Request: rubygem-scruffy - A powerful, clean graphing library for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621017 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-08-12 15:12:20 EDT --- One note: - If you are not going to import this package into EPEL(5 and below), BuildRoot tag is no longer needed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag -- This package (rubygem-scruffy) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622946] Review Request: rubygem-bcrypt-ruby - Wrapper Around bcrypt() password hashing algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622946 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||621015 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 621015] Review Request: rubygem-authlogic - A simple ruby authentication solution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621015 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||622946 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619485] Review Request: python-kitchen - Small, useful pieces of code to make python coding easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619485 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-12 13:55:23 EDT --- python-kitchen-0.2-0.1.a2.el5, fedora-packager-0.5.1.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-kitchen fedora-packager'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-kitchen-0.2-0.1.a2.el5,fedora-packager-0.5.1.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601577] Review Request: liblockfile - This library implements a number of functions found in -lmail on SysV systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601577 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-12 13:54:48 EDT --- liblockfile-1.08-9.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update liblockfile'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/liblockfile-1.08-9.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609193] Review Request: python-dirq - Directory based queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609193 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-dirq-0.0.5-3.el5.1 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609193] Review Request: python-dirq - Directory based queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609193 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-12 13:54:37 EDT --- python-dirq-0.0.5-3.el5.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623425] Review Request: python-pyside - Python bindings for Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623425 --- Comment #8 from Chen Lei 2010-08-12 12:55:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > FYI, upstream use PySide instead of pyside[1] and fedora naming guideline > > for > > python addons also mentions "When in doubt, use the name of the module that > > you > > type to import it in a script"[2] > Depends on where you look. Upstream pages which talk about packaging or repos > use lower case pyside: > http://www.pyside.org/downloads/ > http://qt.gitorious.org/pyside/ > Besides that, Fedora Naming Guidelines say: > "If this package has been packaged by other distributions/packagers in the > past, then you should try to match their name for consistency." > so I think it makes sense to follow Debian lead here. Though I not consider using python-pyside is agaist fedora naming guideline, I'm pretty sure following debian naming policy[1] is agaist fedora naming guideline[2]. [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Source Package names (both source and binary, see Package, Section 5.6.7) must consist only of lower case letters... [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#Case_Sensitivity -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620556] Review Request: folks - GObject contact aggregation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620556 --- Comment #5 from Yanko Kaneti 2010-08-12 12:32:07 EDT --- Yep, thanks Spec URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/folks/folks.spec SRPM URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/folks/folks-0.1.13-2.fc15.src.rpm - Add BR: libgee-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617056] Review Request: gnupg 1.4.10
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617056 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-08-12 11:46:23 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617056] Review Request: gnupg 1.4.10
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617056 Brian C. Lane changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Brian C. Lane 2010-08-12 11:28:47 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gnupg New Branches: f13 f14 master Owners: bcl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620556] Review Request: folks - GObject contact aggregation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620556 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen 2010-08-12 11:27:23 EDT --- looks like you are missing a libgee-devel BR ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557011] Review Request: clamsmtp - A Daemon to virus scan mail using clamav
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557011 Nathanael Noblet changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(nathan...@gnat.ca | |) | --- Comment #13 from Nathanael Noblet 2010-08-12 11:20:21 EDT --- SRPM: http://www.gnat.ca/clamsmtp-1.10-1.fc13.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.gnat.ca/clamsmtp.spec Should all be fixed up. rpmlint complains a bit on the binary RPM about a few init script stuff that isn't true as the initscript is using the wrapper. I added a small patch to fix a man page issue (I've emailed upstream...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623425] Review Request: python-pyside - Python bindings for Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623425 --- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember 2010-08-12 11:11:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > It seems pyside has a phonon binding, would you mind to check if phonon-devel > is necessary for pyside? Good catch, thanks. * Thu Aug 12 2010 Kalev Lember - 0.4.0-2 - Added missing phonon-devel and qt-webkit-devel deps (#623425) Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/python-pyside.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/python-pyside-0.4.0-2.fc15.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2397329 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623425] Review Request: python-pyside - Python bindings for Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623425 --- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember 2010-08-12 11:07:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > FYI, upstream use PySide instead of pyside[1] and fedora naming guideline for > python addons also mentions "When in doubt, use the name of the module that > you > type to import it in a script"[2] Depends on where you look. Upstream pages which talk about packaging or repos use lower case pyside: http://www.pyside.org/downloads/ http://qt.gitorious.org/pyside/ Besides that, Fedora Naming Guidelines say: "If this package has been packaged by other distributions/packagers in the past, then you should try to match their name for consistency." so I think it makes sense to follow Debian lead here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 426251] Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426251 --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-08-12 10:50:28 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 426251] Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426251 --- Comment #17 from Petr Machata 2010-08-12 10:36:26 EDT --- Sure, go ahead. As you have, I see :) (Was OOO a couple weeks, is why I'm only answering now.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623686] New: Review Request: ccgo - An IGS client written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ccgo - An IGS client written in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623686 Summary: Review Request: ccgo - An IGS client written in C++ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/ccgo/ccgo.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/ccgo/ccgo-0.3.6.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: ccGo is a program allows you to play go with GNU Go on your computer or with other players on an IGS on the Internet. It support smart game format (SGF) suitable for exchanging game records. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2397292 I added gnugo to Requires because ccgo prints warning only to stderr if one is missing. Despite that ccgo can be used without it if someone wants to play against people over Internet or view recorded games locally. $ rpmlint ccgo.spec ../SRPMS/ccgo-0.3.6.4-1.fc13.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/ccgo-* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpm -pqlv ../RPMS/x86_64/ccgo-0.3.6.4-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm -rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot 1305768 srp 12 16:09 /usr/bin/ccgo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 198 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/applications/ccgo.desktop drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/doc/ccgo-0.3.6.4 -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 41 kvě 10 2009 /usr/share/doc/ccgo-0.3.6.4/AUTHORS -rw-r--r--1 rootroot35068 kvě 10 2009 /usr/share/doc/ccgo-0.3.6.4/COPYING -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 554 kvě 10 2009 /usr/share/doc/ccgo-0.3.6.4/README -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 9910 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/locale/hu_HU/LC_MESSAGES/ccgo.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot12040 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/ccgo.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot12041 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/ccgo.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 697 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/man/man6/ccgo.6.gz drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/pixmaps/ccgo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 4036 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/pixmaps/ccgo.xpm -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2241 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/pixmaps/ccgo/banner.png -rw-r--r--1 rootroot20569 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/pixmaps/ccgo/black_stone.png -rw-r--r--1 rootroot12974 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/pixmaps/ccgo/board.png -rw-r--r--1 rootroot15844 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/pixmaps/ccgo/ccgo.png -rw-r--r--1 rootroot14314 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/pixmaps/ccgo/gamelist_icon.png -rw-r--r--1 rootroot15265 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/pixmaps/ccgo/igs_icon.png -rw-r--r--1 rootroot14714 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/pixmaps/ccgo/main_icon.png -rw-r--r--1 rootroot15250 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/pixmaps/ccgo/matching_icon.png -rw-r--r--1 rootroot15168 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/pixmaps/ccgo/matchlist_icon.png -rw-r--r--1 rootroot16542 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/pixmaps/ccgo/observing_icon.png -rw-r--r--1 rootroot14569 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/pixmaps/ccgo/playerlist_icon.png -rw-r--r--1 rootroot16075 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/pixmaps/ccgo/playing_icon.png -rw-r--r--1 rootroot15199 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/pixmaps/ccgo/teaching_icon.png -rw-r--r--1 rootroot15766 srp 12 16:09 /usr/share/pixmaps/ccgo/white_stone.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623686] Review Request: ccgo - An IGS client written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623686 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://ccdw.org/~cjj/prog/c ||cgo/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527250] Review Request: dumpet - A tool to dump and debug bootable CD images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527250 --- Comment #5 from Peter Jones 2010-08-12 10:20:17 EDT --- (I have fixed the tabs+spaces issue in the rawhide git tree, but not rebuilt the package.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623425] Review Request: python-pyside - Python bindings for Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623425 --- Comment #5 from Chen Lei 2010-08-12 10:06:12 EDT --- It seems pyside has a phonon binding, would you mind to check if phonon-devel is necessary for pyside? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623425] Review Request: python-pyside - Python bindings for Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623425 --- Comment #4 from Chen Lei 2010-08-12 09:54:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Main reason why I chose the name "python-pyside" is to match Debian naming for > consistency: http://packages.debian.org/sid/python-pyside Actually, debian/gentoo don't allow package names with capital letters :) e.g. http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/python-qt4 FYI, upstream use PySide instead of pyside[1] and fedora naming guideline for python addons also mentions "When in doubt, use the name of the module that you type to import it in a script"[2]. So I suggest use python-PySide instead of python-pyside. [1]http://www.pyside.org/faq/ [2]http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623425] Review Request: python-pyside - Python bindings for Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623425 --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember 2010-08-12 09:15:55 EDT --- Main reason why I chose the name "python-pyside" is to match Debian naming for consistency: http://packages.debian.org/sid/python-pyside -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622002] Review Request: emacs-rinari - Ruby on rails minor mode for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622002 Shakthi Kannan changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|shakthim...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: gold - Allocation manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #26 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-08-12 08:36:27 EDT --- Sorry, of course I meant "summary" where I wrote "description" above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623425] Review Request: python-pyside - Python bindings for Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623425 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercyp...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Chen Lei 2010-08-12 08:36:20 EDT --- Will it be better to rename it to python-PySide? It seems pyside actually use PySide as the namespace for module names and include dir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: gold - Allocation manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #25 from Jessica Jones 2010-08-12 08:17:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > The last scm request you filed needs to match what you want, yes. Currently, > you're requesting "Gold" but the summary says "gold", so the tool we use just > ends up complaining that they don't match. To save you time, I'll just fix it > up. Thanks. > I also note that "Allocation manager" is a rather poor package description; I > didn't check the SRPM, but I hope it's better there (or else it shouldn't have > passed review). No, it is not the description, only the summary. > Git done (by process-git-requests). Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: gold - Allocation manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-08-12 08:10:57 EDT --- The last scm request you filed needs to match what you want, yes. Currently, you're requesting "Gold" but the summary says "gold", so the tool we use just ends up complaining that they don't match. To save you time, I'll just fix it up. I also note that "Allocation manager" is a rather poor package description; I didn't check the SRPM, but I hope it's better there (or else it shouldn't have passed review). Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: gold - Allocation manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-08-12 08:06:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > Do I need to fill out the SCM thing again? Yes, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611454] Review Request: python-bcrypt - Python bindings for OpenBSD's Blowfish password hashing code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611454 --- Comment #13 from Mohammed Safwat 2010-08-12 07:28:47 EDT --- OK. That's it. You may now continue doing other informal reviews while waiting for a sponsor. Good luck! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611454] Review Request: python-bcrypt - Python bindings for OpenBSD's Blowfish password hashing code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611454 --- Comment #12 from David Riches 2010-08-12 07:14:23 EDT --- Fixed, thanks again :) Dave Riches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611454] Review Request: python-bcrypt - Python bindings for OpenBSD's Blowfish password hashing code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611454 --- Comment #11 from Mohammed Safwat 2010-08-12 07:03:44 EDT --- I'm afraid your recent changelog entries still don't conform to the formulas described at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs; they're still missing your name. A changelog entry should contain both your name and e-mail, not only your e-mail. For example, your latest changelog should look something like this * Thu Aug 12 2010 David Riches - 0.2-3 - Rebuilt for python 2.7 Using rpmdev-bumpspec, you can issue this command to produce the above changelog entry: rpmdev-bumpspec --comment='- Rebuilt for python 2.7' --userstring="David Riches " py-bcrypt.spec Hope it helps out! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611454] Review Request: python-bcrypt - Python bindings for OpenBSD's Blowfish password hashing code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611454 --- Comment #10 from David Riches 2010-08-12 06:08:28 EDT --- Thanks again for the comments. I have updated that changelog, and now rebuilt for Py2.7 http://dcr226.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/py-bcrypt.spec http://dcr226.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/py-bcrypt-0.2-3.src.rpm Thanks again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623606] Review Request: gxneur - GTK front-end for X Neural Switcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623606 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||623604 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623604] Review Request: xneur - X Neural Switcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623604 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||623606 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623604] New: Review Request: xneur - X Neural Switcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xneur - X Neural Switcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623604 Summary: Review Request: xneur - X Neural Switcher Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pa...@hubbitus.info QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora13/xneur/xneur.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora13/xneur/xneur-0.9.9-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Intellectual keyboard layouts switcher. It's program like Punto Switcher, but has other functionally and features for configuration. P.S. Spec file formatted by tabs with 5 space width ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PavelAlexeev/tabsize ). Please, do not start review if it is a problem for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623606] New: Review Request: gxneur - GTK front-end for X Neural Switcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gxneur - GTK front-end for X Neural Switcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623606 Summary: Review Request: gxneur - GTK front-end for X Neural Switcher Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pa...@hubbitus.info QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora13/gxneur/gxneur.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora13/gxneur/gxneur-0.9.9-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: GTK front-end for X Neural Switcher. It's program like Punto Switcher, but has other functionally and features. P.S. Spec file formatted by tabs with 5 space width ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PavelAlexeev/tabsize ). Please, do not start review if it is a problem for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 621559] Review Request: perl-Data-Properties - Perl equivalent of java.util.Properties
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621559 --- Comment #3 from Jessica Jones 2010-08-12 05:52:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-Properties/ - "License: UNKNOWN" is not very > helpful. I've sent an email to the upstream author at the address mentioned > in > the source and asked for clarification. This is what the upstream maintainer/author had to say: "On 11/08/10 00:00,, Brian Moseley wrote: > huh, I'm surprised that you find it that useful, but okay. it doesn't > look like I included a license in the distribution, but if I were to > do so today, it would be under the most recent Apache license." I have asked if he would mind updating the CPAN entry, as that would help clear up future confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: gold - Allocation manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #22 from Jessica Jones 2010-08-12 05:53:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Ah, if the srpm name is "gold", SCM request should be filed with > "Package Name: gold" and the summary of this bugzilla should be > changed to "Review request: gold - ". > > At the top of this bugzilla page, you can see > "Bug 618761 - Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC (edit) ". > Click "edit" and change the summary of this bugzilla. Thanks, that makes it much easier. I have changed the summary of this request. Do I need to fill out the SCM thing again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: gold - Allocation manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 Jessica Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review request: Gold|Review request: gold - |Allocation Manager for HPC |Allocation manager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-08-12 05:47:34 EDT --- Ah, if the srpm name is "gold", SCM request should be filed with "Package Name: gold" and the summary of this bugzilla should be changed to "Review request: gold - ". At the top of this bugzilla page, you can see "Bug 618761 - Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC (edit) ". Click "edit" and change the summary of this bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #20 from Jessica Jones 2010-08-12 05:42:51 EDT --- I assume that this is the right way around? The software is called "Gold Allocation Manager" on its home page, and usually referred to as just 'Gold', but the RPM is called 'gold'. I have assumed from what has been said that the SCM request package name should match the software name, but please let me know if this is not the case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 Jessica Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #19 from Jessica Jones 2010-08-12 05:41:10 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: Gold Short Description: allocation manager Owners: zaniyah Branches: f13 f14 el5 el6 InitialCC: zaniyah -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761 --- Comment #18 from Jessica Jones 2010-08-12 05:40:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Kevin is asking in which name you want to have this software registered > on Fedora package database, and to clarify this is asking to fix > either the summary of _this bugzilla's summary_ (i.e. to change > the summary of this bugzilla entry to > "Review request: gold - Allocation Manager", or to change the > package name in SCM request. Ah I understand now, thanks. I did not know there was a requirement for that. I had assumed that package name == rpm name, rather than software name. It is not at all clear what most of the fields are from the wiki page on review requests. I will submit a new SCM request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620556] Review Request: folks - GObject contact aggregation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620556 Yanko Kaneti changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: folks - |Review Request: folks - |GObject/C/Vala contact |GObject contact aggregation |aggregation library |library --- Comment #3 from Yanko Kaneti 2010-08-12 03:25:20 EDT --- New upstream release and and attempt to deal with the new vala api versioning Spec URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/folks/folks.spec SRPM URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/folks/folks-0.1.13-1.fc15.src.rpm This still requires telepathy-glib built with the vala bindings.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
