[Bug 603245] Review Request: python-zmq - Software library for fast, message-based applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603245 --- Comment #15 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-08-14 02:05:45 EDT --- tomspur is correct here -- The guidelines basically leave it to maintainer option among the listed variants with a preference for python-[module name]. Since there's a python3 version of the module as tomspur notes, python-zmq and python3-zmq makes sense. pyzmq and python3-pyzmq or python-pyzmq and python3-pyzmq would also be acceptable combinations but it's maintainer choice among these variants. Thanks for being thorough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601577] Review Request: liblockfile - This library implements a number of functions found in -lmail on SysV systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601577 --- Comment #37 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-08-14 01:51:41 EDT --- Michael, thank you. I found it useful and try remember. But have we it explained anywhere in wiki? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603245] Review Request: python-zmq - Software library for fast, message-based applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603245 --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(पराग) 2010-08-14 00:04:08 EDT --- Ok. As per written in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 and upstream is using py in its project name, please change package name to pyzmq. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 490940] Review Request: pubcookie - Open-source software for intra-institutional web authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490940 Rafael Aquini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com --- Comment #1 from Rafael Aquini 2010-08-14 00:38:19 EDT --- Gabriel, Are you still interested in get Pubcookie reviewed? If so, please consider update it to upstream 3.3.4 latest release. Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563471] Tracker: Review Requests for Fedora Security Lab related packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563471 Rafael Aquini changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|477546(netdude) | Bug 563471 depends on bug 566405, which changed state. Bug 566405 Summary: Review Request: nmbscan - A NMB/SMB network scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566405 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 477546] Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 Rafael Aquini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||aqu...@linux.com Blocks|563471(FE-SECLAB) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2010-08-14 00:13:27 --- Comment #12 from Rafael Aquini 2010-08-14 00:13:27 EDT --- It's been almost two years without any progress on this review. Due to this lack of activity and no replies to the latest PING (Comment 11), this review is now considered stalled. I'm closing this bug just as described in Fedora's Policy for stalled package reviews: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603245] Review Request: python-zmq - Software library for fast, message-based applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603245 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a.bad...@gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Parag AN(पराग) 2010-08-14 00:07:58 EDT --- also, I am adding Toshio for second opinion here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603245] Review Request: python-zmq - Software library for fast, message-based applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603245 --- Comment #12 from Chen Lei 2010-08-13 23:36:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > IMHO, the name python-zmq don't match Fedora naming guideline, though I > > think > > the naming guideline for python modules isn't clearly enough and cause many > > inconsistencies in the repo. > > See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 > """ > [snip] > This makes a package name format of python-$NAME. When in doubt, use the name > of the module that you type to import it in a script. > """ > > The imported module is zmq -> python-zmq > If it would be pyzmq -> python-pyzmq, but it isn't. > Or what do you mean? > I really like the name python-zmq, however many times when I perform a review, I can't persuade even one submitter to change their package names. They tend to use pyzmq or even python-pyzmq. Currently, the naming guideline for python modules is ambiguous and already cause a lot of inconsistency in fedora repo. FYI, currently three naming scheme are used in fedora: [1]python-[tarball_name] Packages of python modules (thus they rely on python as a parent) use a slightly different naming scheme. They should take into account the upstream name of the python module. This makes a package name format of python-$NAME [2]python-[module_name] When in doubt, use the name of the module that you type to import it in a script. [3]tarball_name There is an exception to this rule. If the upstream source has "py" (or "Py") in its name, you can use that name for the package. So, for example, pygtk is acceptable. Personally, I like most python-modules should use python-[module_name], only a few packages should use python-[tarball_name](e.g. a tarball containing a lot of different namespace or the tarball_name is much more widely used than module_name), tarball_name should be completely forbidden. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226547] Merge Review: x86info
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226547 --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(पराग) 2010-08-13 23:21:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > > > x86info.spec:14: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes kernel-utils > > > x86info.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: x86info-1.25.tgz > > > 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. > > > > > > For the first, see comment 3 > > > > If you made it obsolete the last EVR ever pushed of kernel-utils and > > anything > > older than that, it would be possible in the future for a new kernel-utils > > package (possibly a completely different package than the old one) to be > > added > > to Fedora (possibly with an epoch to avoid your obsolete); with an > > unversioned > > obsolete, it's simply not possible. > > tbh, it was so long ago, we probably just drop the obsolete: completely now > that the transition has happened. I doubt anyone is going to try an FC3 -> > FC14 > upgrade. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624179] Review Request: zathura - A lightweight PDF viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624179
d. johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drjohns...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from d. johnson 2010-08-13 20:47:32 EDT
---
Not an official reviewer.
% rpmlint zathura-*
zathura-debuginfo.i686: E: empty-debuginfo-package
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
- Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
- Spec file matches base package name.
- Spec has consistent macro usage.
- Meets Packaging Guidelines.
- License - BSD-like, but does not match
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses
- License field in spec matches (BSD)
- License file included in package
- Spec in American English
- Spec is legible.
- Sources match upstream md5sum:
- BuildRequires correct
- Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
- Package has a correct %clean section.
- Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
- Package is code or permissible content.
- Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
- .la files are removed.
- Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
- Package has no duplicate files in %files.
- Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
- Package owns all the directories it creates.
- No rpmlint output. (see above)
- final provides and requires are sane:
(include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =;
rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done
manually indented after checking each line. I also remove the rpmlib junk and
anything provided by glibc.)
libatk-1.0.so.0
libcairo.so.2
libfontconfig.so.1
libfreetype.so.6
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
libgio-2.0.so.0
libglib-2.0.so.0
libgmodule-2.0.so.0
libgobject-2.0.so.0
libgthread-2.0.so.0
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
libm.so.6
libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libpango-1.0.so.0
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
libpangoft2-1.0.so.0
libpoppler-glib.so.4
SHOULD Items:
- Should build in mock. (Does)
- Should build on all supported archs (Does)
- Should function as described.
- Should have sane scriptlets. (None)
- Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
(None)
- Should have dist tag (Does)
- Should package latest version
- check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews)
Issues:
1. License needs verification from author.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624179] Review Request: zathura - A lightweight PDF viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624179 François Cami changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX --- Comment #2 from François Cami 2010-08-13 20:44:53 EDT --- Closing until licensing issues can be sorted out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226547] Merge Review: x86info
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226547 --- Comment #10 from Dave Jones 2010-08-13 19:55:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > x86info.spec:14: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes kernel-utils > > x86info.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: x86info-1.25.tgz > > 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. > > > > For the first, see comment 3 > > If you made it obsolete the last EVR ever pushed of kernel-utils and anything > older than that, it would be possible in the future for a new kernel-utils > package (possibly a completely different package than the old one) to be added > to Fedora (possibly with an epoch to avoid your obsolete); with an unversioned > obsolete, it's simply not possible. tbh, it was so long ago, we probably just drop the obsolete: completely now that the transition has happened. I doubt anyone is going to try an FC3 -> FC14 upgrade. > > The 2nd.. What exactly is wrong with that ? > > It's looking for a URL rather than a filename. > Something like http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/x86info/x86info-1.25.tgz > perhaps? I thought koji can't access Source:'s that aren't in the lookaside ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624182] Review Request: stardict-xmllittre - Authoritative 19th century French dictionary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624182 François Cami changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Depends on||617340 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617340] Review Request: throttle - copy stdin to stdout at the specified speed (or lower)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617340 François Cami changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||624182 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624182] New: Review Request: stardict-xmllittre - Authoritative 19th century French dictionary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: stardict-xmllittre - Authoritative 19th century French dictionary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624182 Summary: Review Request: stardict-xmllittre - Authoritative 19th century French dictionary Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: f...@fcami.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/stardict-xmllittre.spec SRPM URL: http://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/stardict-xmllittre-1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Authoritative 19th century French dictionary (the "Littré"), in StarDict format. From the package wishlist: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist#X-Z -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617340] Review Request: throttle - copy stdin to stdout at the specified speed (or lower)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617340 --- Comment #7 from François Cami 2010-08-13 19:29:32 EDT --- Another package review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624182 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518441] Review Request: ike - Shrew Soft VPN Client For Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518441 François Cami changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #435994|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603245] Review Request: python-zmq - Software library for fast, message-based applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603245
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Spura 2010-08-13
18:52:46 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> IMHO, the name python-zmq don't match Fedora naming guideline, though I think
> the naming guideline for python modules isn't clearly enough and cause many
> inconsistencies in the repo.
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29
"""
[snip]
This makes a package name format of python-$NAME. When in doubt, use the name
of the module that you type to import it in a script.
"""
The imported module is zmq -> python-zmq
If it would be pyzmq -> python-pyzmq, but it isn't.
Or what do you mean?
> Currently, many existed py* packages(e.g. pygtk2) are already named as
> python3-py*. Maybe we should adopt python modules naming guldeine from debian,
> which seems more clear than ours.
Don't know the guidelines from debian... Maybe you could bring that up to the
guidelines commitee?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/
Parag: Thanks for the review.
Any doubts to the name "python-zmq"?
(In reply to comment #9)
> python-zmq.src:139: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
> python-zmq.src:139: W: macro-in-comment %{python3_sitearch}
> ==> If comments are only for temporary then its ok to keep them otherwise
> remove those lines from spec.
This shall remember me for enabling the testsuite as soon as python3-nose is
available. So this is partly temarary (don't know when nose will support
python3).
> - You used everywhere %{buildroot} except one place used $RPM_OPT_FLAGS"
>Please fix this
Done locally.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 621416] Review Request: libgeotiff -- GeoTIFF format library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416 --- Comment #10 from Volker Fröhlich 2010-08-13 18:51:47 EDT --- Shall I wait for upstream's revised license file or much rather create a subpackage, since there are two different licenses? What is EPSG's license actually called? There are a couple of "libtool: install: warning: `../libgeotiff.la' has not been installed in `/usr/lib64'". Should I worry about them? Spec URL: http://geofrogger.net/review/libgeotiff.spec SRPM URL: http://geofrogger.net/review/libgeotiff-1.3.0-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624179] Review Request: zathura - A lightweight PDF viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624179 François Cami changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Depends on||617340 --- Comment #1 from François Cami 2010-08-13 18:39:17 EDT --- Adding FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Zathura is on the Package Wishlist: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList#X-Z -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617340] Review Request: throttle - copy stdin to stdout at the specified speed (or lower)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617340 François Cami changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||624179 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624179] New: Review Request: zathura - A lightweight PDF viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zathura - A lightweight PDF viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624179 Summary: Review Request: zathura - A lightweight PDF viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: f...@fcami.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/zathura.spec SRPM URL: http://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/zathura-0.0.8.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Zathura is a highly configurable and functional PDF viewer based on the Poppler rendering library and the GTK+ toolkit. The idea behind zathura is an application that provides a minimalist and space saving interface as well as an easy usage that mainly focuses on keyboard interaction. Please note that I need a sponsor as I am not a packager yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619485] Review Request: python-kitchen - Small, useful pieces of code to make python coding easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619485 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 18:38:20 EDT --- fedora-packager-0.5.1.2-2.el5, python-kitchen-0.2-0.1.a2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fedora-packager python-kitchen'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-kitchen-0.2-0.1.a2.el5,fedora-packager-0.5.1.2-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 587087] Review Request: Spawning - A HTTP server for hosting WSGI python web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587087 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|Spawning-0.9.3-0.rc2.4.el5 |Spawning-0.9.3-0.rc2.5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617340] Review Request: throttle - copy stdin to stdout at the specified speed (or lower)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617340 --- Comment #6 from François Cami 2010-08-13 18:40:21 EDT --- Another package review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624179 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 587087] Review Request: Spawning - A HTTP server for hosting WSGI python web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587087 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 18:37:50 EDT --- Spawning-0.9.3-0.rc2.5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624146] Review Request: ups debugger - a C/C++ debugger w/ GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624146 Randall "Randy" Berry changed: What|Removed |Added CC||randyn3...@gmail.com Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 496697] Review Request: ikvm - This package provides IKVM.NET
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496697 Rafael Aquini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #5 from Rafael Aquini 2010-08-13 18:26:46 EDT --- Due to the lack of response, this review is now considered as stalled. I'm closing this bug just as described in Fedora's Policy for stalled package reviews: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611080] Review Request: python-unittest2 - Backport of new unittest feature for Python 2.7 to Python 2.4+
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611080 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:59:34 EDT --- python-unittest2-0.5.1-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-unittest2-0.5.1-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611080] Review Request: python-unittest2 - Backport of new unittest feature for Python 2.7 to Python 2.4+
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611080 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611080] Review Request: python-unittest2 - Backport of new unittest feature for Python 2.7 to Python 2.4+
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611080 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:59:39 EDT --- python-unittest2-0.5.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-unittest2-0.5.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611080] Review Request: python-unittest2 - Backport of new unittest feature for Python 2.7 to Python 2.4+
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611080 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:59:44 EDT --- python-unittest2-0.5.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-unittest2-0.5.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601577] Review Request: liblockfile - This library implements a number of functions found in -lmail on SysV systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601577
--- Comment #36 from Michael Schwendt 2010-08-13 17:42:57
EDT ---
Um, -n was missing:
ldconfig -N -n %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601577] Review Request: liblockfile - This library implements a number of functions found in -lmail on SysV systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601577
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mschwe...@gmail.com
--- Comment #35 from Michael Schwendt 2010-08-13 17:39:25
EDT ---
There's a cheaper way to create shared lib symlinks (it also creates local
links instead of links to an absolute path):
--- liblockfile.spec.orig 2010-08-13 23:32:18.0 +0200
+++ liblockfile.spec2010-08-13 23:36:49.0 +0200
@@ -49,8 +49,7 @@
mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_mandir}/man3
make ROOT=%{buildroot} install
-# create links for ldconfig
-ln -s %{_libdir}/liblockfile.so.1.0 %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/liblockfile.so.1
+ldconfig -N %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}
%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609193] Review Request: python-dirq - Directory based queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609193 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:31:30 EDT --- python-dirq-0.0.5-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601115] Review Request: lockfile-progs - safely lock and unlock files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601115
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mschwe...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt 2010-08-13 17:28:54
EDT ---
The "make check" target looks suitable for a %check section.
> I suggest to replace %{__mkdir} and %{__cp} with plain mkdir and cp,
> respectively
*Highly* recommended, especially since the "Makefile" doesn't use those RPM
macros either. (btw, %{__mkdir_p} would also exist :-p)
> CFLAGS='%{optflags}'
Strictly necessary as else it won't use Fedora's global flags.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617478] Review Request: perl-Data-Random - Perl module to generate random data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617478 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Data-Random-0.05-2.fc1 |perl-Data-Random-0.05-2.fc1 |2 |3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609193] Review Request: python-dirq - Directory based queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609193 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-dirq-0.0.5-3.fc12|python-dirq-0.0.5-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617478] Review Request: perl-Data-Random - Perl module to generate random data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617478 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:29:29 EDT --- perl-Data-Random-0.05-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617479] Review Request: perl-GD-SecurityImage - Security image (captcha) generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617479 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.70- |perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.70- |1.fc13 |1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614451] Review Request: rubygem-gherkin - A fast Gherkin lexer/parser based on the Ragel State Machine Compiler.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614451 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-gherkin-2.1.5-3.fc1 |rubygem-gherkin-2.1.5-3.fc1 |2 |3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617479] Review Request: perl-GD-SecurityImage - Security image (captcha) generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617479 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:25:21 EDT --- perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.70-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614451] Review Request: rubygem-gherkin - A fast Gherkin lexer/parser based on the Ragel State Machine Compiler.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614451 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:23:14 EDT --- rubygem-gherkin-2.1.5-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573741] Review Request: RBTools - Tools for interacting with ReviewBoard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573741 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:15:37 EDT --- RBTools-0.2-5.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609193] Review Request: python-dirq - Directory based queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609193 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:17:47 EDT --- python-dirq-0.0.5-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575605] nikto 2.1.1 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575605 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:16:49 EDT --- nikto-2.1.1-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617479] Review Request: perl-GD-SecurityImage - Security image (captcha) generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617479 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:17:13 EDT --- perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.70-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601115] Review Request: lockfile-progs - safely lock and unlock files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601115
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de
--- Comment #6 from Martin Gieseking 2010-08-13
17:16:38 EDT ---
Here are some more quick comments:
- replace "make" with
make %{_smp_mflags} CFLAGS='%{optflags}'
and move it to the %build section
- in order to ensure that symbolic links are created, add
sed -i 's/\(cd bin && ln \)/\1 -sf /' Makefile
before the call of make (or patch the Makefile appropriately)
- I suggest to replace %{__mkdir} and %{__cp} with plain mkdir and cp,
respectively
- add COPYING as %doc
- be more specific when adding the man pages:
%{_mandir}/man1/*.1*
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617479] Review Request: perl-GD-SecurityImage - Security image (captcha) generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617479 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.70- ||1.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609193] Review Request: python-dirq - Directory based queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609193 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-dirq-0.0.5-3.el5.1 |python-dirq-0.0.5-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575605] nikto 2.1.1 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575605 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||nikto-2.1.1-2.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573741] Review Request: RBTools - Tools for interacting with ReviewBoard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573741 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|RBTools-0.2-5.fc13 |RBTools-0.2-5.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575605] nikto 2.1.1 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575605 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nikto-2.1.1-2.fc13 |nikto-2.1.1-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575605] nikto 2.1.1 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575605 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:17:59 EDT --- nikto-2.1.1-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615669] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Cracklib - perl module to interact with libcrack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615669 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-Cracklib-1.5-3.f ||c13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614451] Review Request: rubygem-gherkin - A fast Gherkin lexer/parser based on the Ragel State Machine Compiler.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614451 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||rubygem-gherkin-2.1.5-3.fc1 ||2 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619462] Review Request: tyrion - A framework for systems automation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619462 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||tyrion-0.0.1-1.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614451] Review Request: rubygem-gherkin - A fast Gherkin lexer/parser based on the Ragel State Machine Compiler.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614451 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:12:01 EDT --- rubygem-gherkin-2.1.5-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615669] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Cracklib - perl module to interact with libcrack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615669 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:12:57 EDT --- perl-Crypt-Cracklib-1.5-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 612565] Review Request: shigofumi - Command line client for accessing the Czech Data Boxes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612565 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:10:03 EDT --- shigofumi-0.1-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 612565] Review Request: shigofumi - Command line client for accessing the Czech Data Boxes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612565 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:09:41 EDT --- shigofumi-0.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619462] Review Request: tyrion - A framework for systems automation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619462 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:12:45 EDT --- tyrion-0.0.1-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617478] Review Request: perl-Data-Random - Perl module to generate random data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617478 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Data-Random-0.05-2.fc1 ||2 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617400] Review Request: pfHandle - wrapper for tools to manage postfix mail queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617400 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||pfHandle-1.1-3.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617400] Review Request: pfHandle - wrapper for tools to manage postfix mail queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617400 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:08:31 EDT --- pfHandle-1.1-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617478] Review Request: perl-Data-Random - Perl module to generate random data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617478 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-13 17:05:34 EDT --- perl-Data-Random-0.05-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601115] Review Request: lockfile-progs - safely lock and unlock files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601115 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-08-13 16:40:47 EDT --- Why you provide URL to Debian package but not upstream page? Is upstream alive? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226547] Merge Review: x86info
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226547 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #9 from Paul Howarth 2010-08-13 16:27:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I just removed the warning about whitespace. > > The only remaining warnings I see are .. > > x86info.spec:14: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes kernel-utils > x86info.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: x86info-1.25.tgz > 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. > > For the first, see comment 3 If you made it obsolete the last EVR ever pushed of kernel-utils and anything older than that, it would be possible in the future for a new kernel-utils package (possibly a completely different package than the old one) to be added to Fedora (possibly with an epoch to avoid your obsolete); with an unversioned obsolete, it's simply not possible. > The 2nd.. What exactly is wrong with that ? It's looking for a URL rather than a filename. Something like http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/x86info/x86info-1.25.tgz perhaps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569833] Review Request: drupal6 - An open-source content-management platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569833 --- Comment #18 from Paul W. Frields 2010-08-13 16:23:24 EDT --- Well, now I get to both eat crow and be hoist with my own petard. This error now happens using the new /etc/httpd/conf.d/drupal6-site.conf: Syntax error on line 103 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/drupal6-site.conf: RewriteBase: only valid in per-directory config files Which, AIUI, means the rewrite *has* to be done in /usr/share/drupal6. Jon, my apologies for not realizing that and for causing you extra work. I hereby lash myself 50 times with a wet noodle and encourage you to ignore me in this bug from here on out. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601115] Review Request: lockfile-progs - safely lock and unlock files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601115 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Runge 2010-08-13 16:01:55 EDT --- A new version from upstream. Should have checked this five minutes earlier. SRPM: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/lockfile-progs-0.1.15-1.fc13.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/lockfile-progs.spec rpmlint /home/mrunge/rpmbuild/SRPMS/lockfile-progs-0.1.15-1.fc13.src.rpm /home/mrunge/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/lockfile-progs-0.1.15-1.fc13.i686.rpm /home/mrunge/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/lockfile-progs-debuginfo-0.1.15-1.fc13.i686.rpm lockfile-progs.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US liblockfile -> blockbusting, blockbuster, Blockbuster lockfile-progs.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US liblockfile -> blockbusting, blockbuster, Blockbuster 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. I'm sure, those warning can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624146] New: Review Request: ups debugger - a C/C++ debugger w/ GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ups debugger - a C/C++ debugger w/ GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624146 Summary: Review Request: ups debugger - a C/C++ debugger w/ GUI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bigw...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://badcheese.com/~steve/ups.spec SRPM URL: http://badcheese.com/~steve/ups-3.38-0.10.beta2.fc13.src.rpm Description: ups is an older debugger for C and C++ code. Work on it was dropped a while ago, but recently I found that someone had started writing patches for it and has continued to keep it up-to-date so that it works on Fedora. I built the source rpm for it and verified that it runs on i386 and x86_64 architectures. I'll be happy to be the official package maintainer for this package, but I don't have a sponsor at this time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601115] Review Request: lockfile-progs - safely lock and unlock files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601115 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge 2010-08-13 15:54:19 EDT --- I've updated the spec-file slightly. Revision -2 is here: SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/lockfile-progs.spec SRPM: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/lockfile-progs-0.1.13-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557011] Review Request: clamsmtp - A Daemon to virus scan mail using clamav
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557011 Nathanael Noblet changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Nathanael Noblet 2010-08-13 15:36:50 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: clamsmtpd New Branches: F12 F13 F14 EL5 Owners: gnat -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557011] Review Request: clamsmtp - A Daemon to virus scan mail using clamav
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557011 --- Comment #17 from Nathanael Noblet 2010-08-13 15:40:06 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: clamsmtpd Short Description: A daemon to virus scan mail using clamav Owners: gnat Branches: F12 F13 F14 EL5 EL6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557011] Review Request: clamsmtp - A Daemon to virus scan mail using clamav
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557011 --- Comment #16 from Nathanael Noblet 2010-08-13 15:37:55 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: clamsmtpd New Branches: F12 F13 F14 EL5 EL6 Owners: gnat Sorry missed the EL6 branch... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226547] Merge Review: x86info
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226547 --- Comment #8 from Dave Jones 2010-08-13 14:47:23 EDT --- I just removed the warning about whitespace. The only remaining warnings I see are .. x86info.spec:14: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes kernel-utils x86info.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: x86info-1.25.tgz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. For the first, see comment 3 The 2nd.. What exactly is wrong with that ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 Stephen John Smoogen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||smo...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|smo...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557011] Review Request: clamsmtp - A Daemon to virus scan mail using clamav
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557011 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-08-13 13:51:22 EDT --- Okay. -- This package (clamsmtp) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 612581] Review Request: spacewalk-backend - Common programs needed to be installed on the Spacewalk servers/proxies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612581 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||491331(spacewalk-config) --- Comment #10 from Miroslav Suchý 2010-08-13 13:30:45 EDT --- >Requires: /etc/rhn doesn't seem to work for me: >repoquery --enablerepo=rawhide --whatprovides /etc/rhn returns nothing >and none of rpms generated by this SRPM provides this directory >either. Perhaps I am completely wrong, so please explain. This directory is owned by two packages from upstream. One of them ins Review queue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491331 I did not realize this has this dependency. So yes, I understood that BZ 491331 need to be approved before this one, but this review will be probably long run anyway :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 491331] Review Request: spacewalk-config - Spacewalk Configuration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491331 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||612581(spacewalk-backend) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 612581] Review Request: spacewalk-backend - Common programs needed to be installed on the Spacewalk servers/proxies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612581 --- Comment #9 from Miroslav Suchý 2010-08-13 13:27:04 EDT --- >spacewalk-backend-server.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre install >spacewalk-backend-server.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm >This is new package, there is no need to do migrate secret key. Please >try to get rid of those pre/post install/rm commands. ... >If you really have to keep them in, at least put them in ifdefs so >that problematic parts won't be run on Fedoras. Yes. This is new package in Fedora, but this is definitely not new package at all. And if I remove this section, everybody who use Fedora and will upgrade to this package will break his installation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #26 from Orion Poplawski 2010-08-13 13:26:39 EDT --- Ah, sorry about that. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 621713] Review Request: faenza-icon-theme - Icon theme designed for Equinox GTK theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621713 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-08-13 13:26:22 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620990] Review Request: itools - Command line tools for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620990 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-08-13 13:23:26 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 434713] Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434713 --- Comment #13 from Orion Poplawski 2010-08-13 13:21:37 EDT --- Sorry, forgot to fix the cut/paste (I want both) Package Change Request == Package Name: ocaml-cairo Short Description: OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics New Branches: EL-6 Owners: rjones -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 612581] Review Request: spacewalk-backend - Common programs needed to be installed on the Spacewalk servers/proxies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612581 --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Suchý 2010-08-13 13:23:16 EDT --- >spacewalk-backend.noarch: W: manual-page-warning >/usr/share/man/man8/spacewalk-cfg-get.8.gz 1: warning: `\"' not defined >Not sure how to fix that, but it would be good to actually do it. Hmmm, I really do not understood it either. I would like to fix it, but I do not how. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #25 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-08-13 13:22:56 EDT --- Erm, "Free UCS Outline Fonts" is four not-valid branches. I changed it to el6 for you. Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595011] Review Request: sshdfilter - Filter for SSH ports
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595011 --- Comment #10 from Rafael Aquini 2010-08-13 13:16:52 EDT --- David, Please, consider the following review: Good: * Package is named sshdfilter which follows the upstream project name * spec file naming follows package naming * License in spec and license text is GPL which is open source * License text included in the tarball and listed on %file. * Spec is legible and American English * No locale files * No shared libraries * No bundled libraries * Not relocatable * No directories created unowned * No duplicate files * Default permissions are set * Package is code * No large documentation * No %doc files are used at runtime * No header files * Not a GUI application * Does not own files or directories from other packages * All filenames are utf8 NEEDSWORK: [1] ask upstream to include a license disclaimer as a header of sshdfilter perl script [2] chkconfig line is missing in sshdfilter SysVInitScript. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript#.23_chkconfig:_line [3] Source **DOES NOT** matches upstream: * http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~greg/sshdfilter-1.5.7.tar.gz a022aeeb80b4a71e86d330d89dafb89d Downloads/sshdfilter-1.5.7.tar.gz dda362b80c0a3f8297b08ff6f831fcbc rpmbuild/SOURCES/sshdfilter-1.5.7.tar.gz NOTE: [3] is a real Blocker to this package. You can't ship source that mismatch upstream's within your SRPM. That is forbidden accordingly to Packaging Guidelines and Review Policies. As I've wrote on Comment #2, if you are packaging a software without upstream maintenance, you should consider to take over the maintenance and become yourself this software upstream. Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604331] Review Request: redshift - Adjusts the color temperature of your screen according to time of day
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604331 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(miloskomarce...@n ||etscape.net) --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-08-13 13:19:57 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 612581] Review Request: spacewalk-backend - Common programs needed to be installed on the Spacewalk servers/proxies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612581
--- Comment #7 from Miroslav Suchý 2010-08-13 13:17:34 EDT
---
In this comments I list issues which I addressed without any objections. Items
which I would like to comment or discuss will be sent in separate comment so we
can better back reference.
>NEEDSWORK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
>any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
>inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
>
>-libs sub-package has BR on python-devel. Better use python2-devel
> Also use proper macros to define python_sitearch on F12/RHEL-5
addressed
ad man pages. filled BZs: 623965, 623967, 623964, 623966
I will address them in near future.
> * use %global instead of %define (see
addressed
> to call python use %{__python} macro
addressed
>I guess this was supposed to be replaced? "XXX To be determined if the...
yes. removed this XXX
> Requires(pre) is accompanied with Requires:. When you have
addressed
>instead of %{_prefix}/share/rhn use %{_datadir}/rhn
not needed with new definition
>most of sub-packages install python files into /usr/share. This
>is not proper way to deal with python packaging. These files should be moved
>into proper %{python_sitelib} sub-directory
addressed
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 522613] Review Request: python-tornado - Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522613 --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-08-13 13:13:49 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 434713] Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434713 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||or...@cora.nwra.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Orion Poplawski 2010-08-13 12:50:16 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: ocaml-camlidl Short Description: Stub code generator and COM binding for Objective Caml New Branches: EL-6 Owners: rjones Perhaps being presumptuous that Richard wants this, though http://osdir.com/ml/epel-devel-list/2010-07/msg00119.html seems to indicate interest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609473] Review Request: kaya-board - A board game suite for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609473 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(kvo...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-08-13 13:08:01 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 434713] Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434713 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-08-13 13:04:50 EDT --- The change request is for ocaml-camlidl but this review ticket is for ocaml-cairo. Which did you actually want? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 435982] Review Request: ocaml-camlidl - Stub code generator and COM binding for Objective Caml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435982 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||or...@cora.nwra.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Orion Poplawski 2010-08-13 12:43:05 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: ocaml-camlidl Short Description: Stub code generator and COM binding for Objective Caml New Branches: EL-6 Owners: rjones Perhaps being presumptuous that Richard wants this, though http://osdir.com/ml/epel-devel-list/2010-07/msg00119.html seems to indicate interest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Orion Poplawski 2010-08-13 12:30:53 EDT --- We need an EL6 branch for this. Package Change Request == Package Name: gnu-free-fonts New Branches: Free UCS Outline Fonts Owners: limb orion InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 522613] Review Request: python-tornado - Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522613 Ionuț Arțăriși changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619928] Review Request: tigase-server - Tigase XMPP Server in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619928 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-08-13 12:10:51 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609011] Review Request: derby - Relational database implemented entirely in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609011 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-08-13 12:09:18 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868
Paul Flo Williams changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@frixxon.co.uk
--- Comment #2 from Paul Flo Williams 2010-08-13 11:18:49
EDT ---
I am not yet a packager, so this is just an unofficial pre-review, and my first
one of those.
+ OK
? ISSUE
- N/A
+ Package meets naming and packaging guidelines [follows latest font template]
+ Spec file matches base package name.
+ Spec has consistant macro usage.
+ Meets Packaging Guidelines.
+ License
? License field in spec matches
+ License file included in package
+ Spec in American English
+ Spec is legible.
+ Sources match upstream md5sum:
c97c000a4084bed7108f4c75eae657c0 Cantarell-2009-07-17.zip
- Package needs ExcludeArch
+ BuildRequires correct
- Spec handles locales/find_lang
- Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
- Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
+ Package has a correct %clean section.
- Package has correct buildroot [no longer specified]
+ Package is code or permissible content.
- Doc subpackage needed/used.
+ Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
- .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
- .so files in -devel subpackage.
- -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
- .la files are removed.
- Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
+ Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
+ Package has no duplicate files in %files.
+ Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
+ Package owns all the directories it creates.
+ No rpmlint output.
[p...@palant SPECS]$ rpmlint abattis-cantarell-fonts.spec \
../RPMS/noarch/abattis-cantarell-fonts-1.001-1.fc13.noarch.rpm \
../SRPMS/abattis-cantarell-fonts-1.001-1.fc13.src.rpm
abattis-cantarell-fonts.spec:4: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
abattis-cantarell-fonts.spec:4: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
abattis-cantarell-fonts.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag
abattis-cantarell-fonts.src:4: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
abattis-cantarell-fonts.src:4: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
abattis-cantarell-fonts.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
macro-in-comment is ignorable
no-buildroot-tag is obsolete
+ final provides and requires are sane:
Provides:
abattis-cantarell-fonts-1.001-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
config(abattis-cantarell-fonts) = 1.001-1.fc13
font(:lang=aa)
font(:lang=af)
font(:lang=an)
font(:lang=ast)
font(:lang=ay)
font(:lang=bi)
font(:lang=br)
font(:lang=bs)
font(:lang=ca)
font(:lang=ch)
font(:lang=co)
font(:lang=crh)
font(:lang=cs)
font(:lang=csb)
font(:lang=cy)
font(:lang=da)
font(:lang=de)
font(:lang=en)
font(:lang=eo)
font(:lang=es)
font(:lang=et)
font(:lang=eu)
font(:lang=fi)
font(:lang=fil)
font(:lang=fj)
font(:lang=fo)
font(:lang=fr)
font(:lang=fur)
font(:lang=fy)
font(:lang=ga)
font(:lang=gd)
font(:lang=gl)
font(:lang=gv)
font(:lang=ho)
font(:lang=hr)
font(:lang=hsb)
font(:lang=ht)
font(:lang=hu)
font(:lang=ia)
font(:lang=id)
font(:lang=ie)
font(:lang=io)
font(:lang=is)
font(:lang=it)
font(:lang=jv)
font(:lang=ki)
font(:lang=kj)
font(:lang=kl)
font(:lang=ku-tr)
font(:lang=kwm)
font(:lang=la)
font(:lang=lb)
font(:lang=lg)
font(:lang=li)
font(:lang=lt)
font(:lang=lv)
font(:lang=mg)
font(:lang=mh)
font(:lang=ms)
font(:lang=mt)
font(:lang=na)
font(:lang=nb)
font(:lang=nds)
font(:lang=ng)
font(:lang=nl)
font(:lang=nn)
font(:lang=no)
font(:lang=nr)
font(:lang=nso)
font(:lang=ny)
font(:lang=oc)
font(:lang=om)
font(:lang=pap-an)
font(:lang=pap-aw)
font(:lang=pl)
font(:lang=pt)
font(:lang=rm)
font(:lang=rn)
font(:lang=rw)
font(:lang=sc)
font(:lang=se)
font(:lang=sg)
font(:lang=sk)
font(:lang=sl)
font(:lang=sma)
font(:lang=smj)
font(:lang=smn)
font(:lang=sn)
font(:lang=so)
font(:lang=sq)
font(:lang=ss)
font(:lang=st)
font(:lang=su)
font(:lang=sv)
font(:lang=sw)
font(:lang=tk)
font(:lang=tl)
font(:lang=tn)
font(:lang=tr)
font(:lang=ts)
font(:lang=uz)
font(:lang=vo)
font(:lang=vot)
font(:lang=wa)
font(:lang=wen)
font(:lang=wo)
font(:lang=xh)
font(:lang=yap)
font(:lang=za)
font(:lang=zu)
font(cantarell)
abattis-cantarell-fonts = 1.001-1.fc13
Requires:
config(abattis-cantarell-fonts) = 1.001-1.fc13
fontpackages-filesystem
SHOULD Items:
