[Bug 617141] Review Request: gupnp-dlna - A collection of helpers for building DLNA applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617141
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de 2010-08-19
03:06:18 EDT ---
Some questions/ideas:
- As Bruce suggested, please move the {_libdir}/*.so from -doc to -devel
- move /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gupnp-dlna-1.0.pc to -devel
- source url has changed to
http://www.gupnp.org/sites/all/files/sources/gupnp-dlna-0.3.0.tar.gz (URL
without the package-name as dir-name)
- there has been a version 0.3.0 released (3 days ago)
- rpmlint /home/mrunge/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/gupnp-dlna-vala-0.2.1-1.fc13.i686.rpm
gupnp-dlna-vala.i686: E: devel-dependency vala-devel
gupnp-dlna-vala.i686: W: no-documentation
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589866] Review Request: darktable - Utility to organize and develop raw images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589866 --- Comment #23 from Edouard Bourguignon ma...@linuxed.net 2010-08-19 03:20:26 EDT --- I'm a bit lost, where is your rpath patch? I'd like to include it in my darktable package. Or the chrpath --delete is good enough? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 538057] Review Request: rhnmd - Red Hat Network Monitoring Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538057 Milan Zazrivec mzazri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|585232(space11) |623772(space12) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553649] Review Request: rhn-custom-info - Set and list custom values for RHN-enabled machines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553649 Milan Zazrivec mzazri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|585232(space11) |623772(space12) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620794] Review Request: perl-PPIx-Utilities - Extensions to PPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620794 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625242] Review Request: clustershell - Efficient cluster administration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625242
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||terje...@phys.ntnu.no
--- Comment #2 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2010-08-19 06:35:28
EDT ---
Seems like you have used python distutils to create the spec file.
Don't do that, it produce a lot a unwanted stuff.
See my comments and advice in bug #620862
You also need to add vim as buildreq, don't compress mans (rpm will do for
you).
List mans like this (rpm will mark as %doc itself):
%{_mandir}/man1/clubak.1*
Use of --record=INSTALLED_FILES is not allowed.
Again, read comments in bug #620862
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564466] Review Request: ubuntu-title-fonts - decorative font of Ubuntu logo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564466 Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk 2010-08-19 08:20:17 EDT --- Naveen, thank you for the initial review. Nicolas, thank you for the review, and sponsorship. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ubuntu-title-fonts Short Description: decorative font of Ubuntu logo Owners: frixxon Branches: f13 f14 el6 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616580] Review Request: tlomt-junction-fonts - a humanist sans serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616580 Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk 2010-08-19 08:23:41 EDT --- Jochen, Nicolas: thank you for the review. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: tlomt-junction-fonts Short Description: A humanist sans serif font Owners: frixxon Branches: f13 f14 el6 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574627] Review request: sunpinyin - A statistical language model based Chinese input method
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574627 Howard Ning mrlhwlibe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Howard Ning mrlhwlibe...@gmail.com 2010-08-19 09:14:54 EDT --- No major problems in the new version. APPROVED! Additional: Upstream should make the building script better and include the CC-BY-SA license text in the future version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619048] Review Request: ailurus - A simple application installer and GNOME tweaker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619048 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2010-08-19 09:18:15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574627] Review request: sunpinyin - A statistical language model based Chinese input method
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574627 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-08-19 09:37:54 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: sunpinyin Short Description: A statistical language model based Chinese input method engine Owners: liangsuilong supercyper helloworld1 Branches: F-12 F-13 F-14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625453] New: Review Request: libdhash - Dynamic hash table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libdhash - Dynamic hash table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625453 Summary: Review Request: libdhash - Dynamic hash table Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sgall...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/ding-libs/libdhash.spec SRPM URL: http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/ding-libs/libdhash-0.4.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: A hash table which will dynamically re-size to achieve optimal storage access time properties Previously, this library was built from the SSSD tarball, however upstream has split it out into its own tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625476] New: Review Request: libpath_utils - File-system Path Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libpath_utils - File-system Path Utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625476 Summary: Review Request: libpath_utils - File-system Path Utilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sgall...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/ding-libs/libpath_utils.spec SRPM URL: http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/ding-libs/libpath_utils-0.2.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Utility functions to manipulate file-system path names Koji scratch-build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2411651 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226028] Merge Review: libIDL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226028 --- Comment #14 from Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com 2010-08-19 10:52:55 EDT --- Patch looks fine to commit, no objections. If you have the privileges to do a build with it, feel free to that too. Otherwise, I'll do it at some point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 473348] Review Request: drraw - Web based presentation front-end for RRDtool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473348 --- Comment #12 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2010-08-19 11:02:13 EDT --- Rafael, New package with your comments addressed : http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/drraw.spec http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/drraw-2.2-0.6.b2.fc13.src.rpm Thanks for the selinux fix (this is still untested though). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 580480] Review Request: ghc-type-level - A type-level library for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580480 --- Comment #8 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2010-08-19 11:06:52 EDT --- Regarding the patch, it is asking for hscolour to be installed even though it is mentioned as: %bcond_without hscolour Why is it so? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606127] Review Request: colortool - useful tool for web-designers/graphic artists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606127
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de
--- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2010-08-19
11:06:09 EDT ---
Hi Tobias,
here are some more quick comments on your spec file:
- The summary is too generic. It should tell what the program does, not who the
intended users are. :)
- Drop at least the revision number (-7) from BR: qt-devel = 4.5.3-7
(probably, 4.5 instead of 4.5.3 is sufficient too)
- Add BR: desktop-file-utils.
- You can drop Requires: qt (it's automatically picked up as a dependency).
- The creation of the .desktop looks a bit complicated. I recommend to replace
it with a heredoc, e.g. like this:
cat EOT %{name}.desktop
[Desktop Entry]
Name=ColorTool
Comment=Colorspace converter and color chooser
Exec=colortool
Icon=colortool
Terminal=false
Type=Application
Categories=GNOME;GTK;Graphics;
EOT
Also, move these lines to the %build section.
- In the %install section install the .desktop file with
desktop-file-install --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications %{name}.desktop
(the additional parameters given in your spec are not necessary)
- drop export BINDIR/DATADIR from %install (not required)
- the install line for the manpage can be shortened as follows:
install -m 644 -p colortool.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/
- Don't mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. Use only one of both.
- In %files, replace
%{_mandir}/man1/colortool.1.gz
with
%{_mandir}/man1/colortool.1* or %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1*
because you should not rely on a concrete compression format in the spec file
- Add a newline between the %changelog revisions to increase legibility.
That's all for now. :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625480] Review Request: libcollection - Collection data-type for C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625480 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||625482 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625476] Review Request: libpath_utils - File-system Path Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625476 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||625482 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625481] Review Request: mpg123 - A fast and console based real time MPEG Audio Player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625481 Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) Resolution||CANTFIX Last Closed||2010-08-19 11:34:15 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2010-08-19 11:34:15 EDT --- MP3 software cannot be shipped in Fedora. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems#MP3_Support -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625491] New: Review Request: patchelf - A utility for patching ELF binaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: patchelf - A utility for patching ELF binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625491 Summary: Review Request: patchelf - A utility for patching ELF binaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/patchelf/patchelf.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/patchelf/patchelf-0.5-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: PatchELF is a simple utility for modifying existing ELF executables and libraries. It can change the dynamic loader (ELF interpreter) of executables and change the RPATH of executables and libraries. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2411815 $ rpmlint patchelf.spec ../SRPMS/patchelf-0.5-1.fc13.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/patchelf-* patchelf.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US executables - executable, executable s, executants patchelf.src: W: strange-permission patchelf-0.5.tar.bz2 0444L patchelf.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US executables - executable, executable s, executants patchelf.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary patchelf 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. The `executables' is standard plural for `executable' noun. $ rpm -pqlv ../RPMS/x86_64/patchelf-0.5-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm -rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot94400 srp 19 17:34 /usr/bin/patchelf drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 srp 19 17:34 /usr/share/doc/patchelf-0.5 -rw-r--r--1 rootroot35147 led 1 1970 /usr/share/doc/patchelf-0.5/COPYING -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2814 led 1 1970 /usr/share/doc/patchelf-0.5/README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622293] Review Request: erlang-erlydtl - Django Templates for Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622293 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-19 12:43:43 EDT --- erlang-erlydtl-0.6.0-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-erlydtl-0.6.0-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622293] Review Request: erlang-erlydtl - Django Templates for Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622293 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625476] Review Request: libpath_utils - File-system Path Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625476 Rob Crittenden rcrit...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rcrit...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rcrit...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226028] Merge Review: libIDL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226028 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2010-08-19 14:22:13 EDT --- OK, all done! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569833] Review Request: drupal6 - An open-source content-management platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569833 --- Comment #20 from Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com 2010-08-19 14:23:07 EDT --- Thanks for figuring out this problem, David. So this spec file should work then? http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/temp/drupal6.spec http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/temp/drupal6-6.19-1.fc13.src.rpm (Posted these to save Jon 5 minutes... every little bit helps, right?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 610980] Review Request: mspdebug - Debugger and gdb proxy for MSP430 MCUs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610980 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-19 14:29:43 EDT --- mspdebug-0.10-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mspdebug-0.10-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569833] Review Request: drupal6 - An open-source content-management platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569833 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dwa...@redhat.com Flag||needinfo?(dwa...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #21 from Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com 2010-08-19 14:33:54 EDT --- Also, one other thing -- we probably need to get file contexts added to the SELinux targeted policy for the contents of /usr/share/drupal6, /etc/drupal6, and /var/lib/drupal6. Dan, should I file a separate bug for that? And is this something you can add in advance of, or during, a package approval? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 610980] Review Request: mspdebug - Debugger and gdb proxy for MSP430 MCUs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610980 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-19 14:41:30 EDT --- mspdebug-0.10-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mspdebug-0.10-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625476] Review Request: libpath_utils - File-system Path Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625476 --- Comment #2 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com 2010-08-19 14:54:51 EDT --- The BuildRequires on autotools are there because autotools will sometimes internally detect during 'make' that the files need to be regenerated. (This can happen if the version of certain files is different on the build system) I didn't notice that --disable-rpath was ignored. That was left in there from the original package I split off from. Fixed. COPYING file must be included. COPYING.LESSER is a set of extensions to COPYING, not a complete license itself. Thank you for the review. New spec: http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/ding-libs/libpath_utils.spec New SRPM: http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/ding-libs/libpath_utils-0.2.1-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619395] Review Request: mozc - Opensourced Google Japanese Input
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619395
--- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-08-19
15:24:07 EDT ---
Some notes for 0.12.434.102-0.1.20100817svn
* License
- So the license for dictionary/ directory is
* mecab-ipadic (for mecab-ipadic)
* BSD (for mecab-naist-jdic)
? If so, mecab-ipadic should also be added into license tag
(note that mecab-ipadic is already registered in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing )
* BuildRoot
- BuildRoot tag is no longer needed (no longer used) on
Fedora 10+ and EPEL6:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
? Obsoletes
- I don't understand why Obsoletes: ibus-mozc 0.11.383.102 is added
to main package although mozc has not existed on Fedora.
* optflags / make build.log more verbose / debuginfo rpm
- Currently build.log shows the output like:
---
208 + python build_mozc.py build_tools -c Release
209ACTION base_gen_version_def
out_linux/Release/obj/gen/base/version_def.cc
210ACTION base_gen_character_set
out_linux/Release/obj/gen/base/character_set.h
211CXX(target)
out_linux/Release/obj.target/storage/storage/existence_filter.o
212CXX(target)
out_linux/Release/obj.target/storage/storage/lru_storage.o
213CXX(target) out_linux/Release/obj.target/storage/storage/registry.o
214CXX(target)
out_linux/Release/obj.target/storage/storage/tiny_storage.o
---
With these messages we cannot check if optflags are correctly honored
during
build.
- Also currently debuginfo rpm does not contain needed source files:
--
mozc-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources
--
This usually means that optflags are not correctly honored (especially -g
flag), or binaries are stripped during build or install.
- So please make build.log more verbose so that we can check if Fedora
specific
compilation flags are correctly honored.
? %clean
- Why is it needed to call python build_mozc.py clean after build?
(Note that %_builddir%{?buildsubdir} is deleted after build anyway)
* %defattr
- Please set %defattr also for subpackages.
! ppc64 build failure
- By the way your srpm fails to build on F-12 ppc64. It seems that segfault
is
occuring.
/bin/sh: line 1: 8168 Segmentation fault
../mozc_build_tools/linux/gen_connection_data_main --logtostderr
--input=../data/dictionary/connection.txt --make_header
--output=/builddir/build/BUILD/mozc-0.12.434.102/out_linux/Release/obj/gen/converter/embedded_connection_data.h
make: *** [out_linux/Release/obj/gen/converter/embedded_connection_data.h]
Error 139
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2412449
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625476] Review Request: libpath_utils - File-system Path Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625476 --- Comment #4 from Rob Crittenden rcrit...@redhat.com 2010-08-19 16:05:27 EDT --- * source files match upstream: c54f32773a8c78c08340be330882fdb990cfb107 libpath_utils-0.2.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named and is cleanly written * specfile uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. (both of them) * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (F-13, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * %check is present * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * documentation present in -devel package * %docs are set correctly APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625558] New: Review Request: configure-trackpoint - trackpoint configuration utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: configure-trackpoint - trackpoint configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625558 Summary: Review Request: configure-trackpoint - trackpoint configuration utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: davi...@ultracar.co.uk QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dcr226.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/configure-trackpoint.spec SRPM URL: http://dcr226.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/configure-trackpoint-0.7-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Configure-trackpoint is a Gnome TrackPoint configuration tool. It uses the linux kernel 2.6 TrackPoint driver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592645] Review Request: mkgmap - Convert OpenStreetMap data for Garmin GPSes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645 --- Comment #7 from Bruce Cowan b...@bcowan.me.uk 2010-08-19 17:06:49 EDT --- The spec is now at http://bruce89.fedorapeople.org/specs/mkgmap.spec and the srpm is now at http://bruce89.fedorapeople.org/rpms/mkgmap-0-0.3.1658svn.fc13.src.rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625592] Review Request: PyCAM -Open Source CAM - Toolpath Generation for 3-Axis CNC machining
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625592 Dominic Hopf dma...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||dma...@fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dma...@fedoraproject.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-19 17:57:30 EDT --- x509watch-0.3.0-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|x509watch-0.2.0-1.fc13 |x509watch-0.3.0-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|x509watch-0.3.0-1.el5 |x509watch-0.3.0-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618059] Review Request: x509watch - Simple tool to list expiring or expired X.509 certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618059 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-19 17:58:06 EDT --- x509watch-0.3.0-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625602] New: Review Request:libbluray - Library to access Blu-Ray disks for video playback
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:libbluray - Library to access Blu-Ray disks for video playback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625602 Summary: Review Request:libbluray - Library to access Blu-Ray disks for video playback Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xav...@bachelot.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/libbluray.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/libbluray-0.1-0.1.20100819.fc13.src.rpm Description: This package is aiming to provide a full portable free open source bluray library, which can be plugged into popular media players to allow full bluray navigation and playback on Linux. It will eventually be compatible with all current titles, and will be easily portable and embeddable in standard players such as mplayer and vlc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625603] New: Review Request: libaacs - Open implementation of AACS specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libaacs - Open implementation of AACS specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625603 Summary: Review Request: libaacs - Open implementation of AACS specification Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xav...@bachelot.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/libaacs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/libaacs-0.1-0.1.20100817.fc13.src.rpm Description: This library is an open implementation of the AACS specification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625592] Review Request: PyCAM -Open Source CAM - Toolpath Generation for 3-Axis CNC machining
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625592 --- Comment #1 from Fabian fabian.kanngies...@yahoo.de 2010-08-19 18:12:45 EDT --- I still need a sponsor, I will apply to the packager group as soon as possible. With kind regards, Fabian Kanngießer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625592] Review Request: PyCAM -Open Source CAM - Toolpath Generation for 3-Axis CNC machining
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625592 Dominic Hopf dma...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||542416 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542416] Review Request: yagtd - Yet Another Getting Things Done
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542416 Dominic Hopf dma...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||625592 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625603] Review Request: libaacs - Open implementation of AACS specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625603 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) Depends on||625602 --- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2010-08-19 18:17:09 EDT --- This library can be dlopen'ed by libbluray if present and allows decryption of AACS protected bluray disc. The keys are NOT provided. As this is probably a controversial matter, I added a blocker on FE-LEGAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625602] Review Request:libbluray - Library to access Blu-Ray disks for video playback
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625602 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2010-08-19 18:25:09 EDT --- Just for safety, make this bug block FE-LEGAL too, although the most sensitive package is libaacs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625476] Review Request: libpath_utils - File-system Path Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625476 Lameire Alexis alexisis-pristont...@hotmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexisis-pristont...@hotmai ||l.com --- Comment #5 from Lameire Alexis alexisis-pristont...@hotmail.com 2010-08-19 18:55:03 EDT --- Although this package quickly was approved, I still think the above-mentionned BuildRequires are still useless. If ./configure relaunches the autotools, it means that the configure.ac or Makefile.am files were more recent than it. This SHOULD not be the case, the developer MUST relaunchs the autotools to refresh the configure + Makefile.in files. So, since you seem to be also a developer of sssd, you must refresh these files instead of letting configure do the dirty job. You will certainly help packagers (and your potential co-mainteners!) to integrate and spread your stuff in other distributions... I'd like more enlightenments about the license files: I can't understand how the provided LGPL text can extend the completely different GPL one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(lakshminaras2002@ ||gmail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 580480] Review Request: ghc-type-level - A type-level library for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580480 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-08-19 19:46:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) Regarding the patch, it is asking for hscolour to be installed even though it is mentioned as: %bcond_without hscolour bcond is a little confusing: basically above means define a --without hscolour cmdline option for rpmbuild for this package. So to the packager better to think of the opposite as the default. hscolour is still a bit experimental: probably later it will be made default and above line will become superfluous. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 580480] Review Request: ghc-type-level - A type-level library for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580480 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-08-19 19:49:46 EDT --- (Further hscolour is being used to provide colored source links from haddock documentation in case it wasn't obvious. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592645] Review Request: mkgmap - Convert OpenStreetMap data for Garmin GPSes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645 --- Comment #8 from Bruce Cowan b...@bcowan.me.uk 2010-08-19 20:13:09 EDT --- Yet another update, srpm at http://bruce89.fedorapeople.org/rpms/mkgmap-0-0.4.1669svn.fc14.noarch.rpm, scratch build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2413478 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 473348] Review Request: drraw - Web based presentation front-end for RRDtool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473348 Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-19 20:20:53 EDT --- Xavier, Tanks for replying promptly, and also thanks for addressing the NEEDSWORK suggested. As a result, drraw has been built correctly in mock and koji, and also it has installed and worked fine in my test system. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2413481 IMHO this package looks OK, and I'm approving it. Regards. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 539989] Review Request: nettop - top-like program for network packets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539989 Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2010-08-19 20:46:10 --- Comment #8 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-19 20:46:10 EDT --- Due to the lack of response this review is now considered as stalled. I'm closing this bug just as described in Fedora's Policy for stalled package reviews http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 580480] Review Request: ghc-type-level - A type-level library for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580480 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-08-19 21:14:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) Updated: Thanks SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ghc-type-level.spec I think you forgot actually to update this. :) SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ghc-type-level-0.2.4-3.fc15.src.rpm BTW since there are no deps you could remove the references ghc_pkg_deps and ghc_pkg_c_deps if you wish. Otherwise the package looks fine to me. I will post a format review soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com --- Comment #16 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-19 21:10:31 EDT --- PING Since it's been more than a year with no progress; I guess this bug should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 --- Comment #6 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-19 21:14:35 EDT --- **almost a year** My bad, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com --- Comment #5 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-19 21:13:29 EDT --- PING Since it's been more than a year with no progress; I guess this bug should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 491992] Review Request: mod_falcon - An embedded Falcon interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491992 Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com --- Comment #7 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-19 21:19:36 EDT --- PING It's been more than a year with no progress; This review should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 491331] Review Request: spacewalk-config - Spacewalk Configuration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491331 Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com --- Comment #1 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-19 21:18:24 EDT --- PING It's been more than a year with no progress; This review should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com Bug 42 depends on bug 499986, which changed state. Bug 499986 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 42 depends on bug 499983, which changed state. Bug 499983 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499983 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 42 depends on bug 41, which changed state. Bug 41 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=41 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 42 depends on bug 502388, which changed state. Bug 502388 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #6 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-19 21:22:59 EDT --- PING It's been more than a year with no progress; This review should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 517849] Review Request: mpiwrappers - Environment module wrappers for MPI packages in RHEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517849 Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com --- Comment #2 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-19 21:27:39 EDT --- It's been almost a year with no progress; This review should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 517776] Review Request: gettext-ant-tasks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517776 Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com --- Comment #3 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-19 21:29:30 EDT --- PING It's been almost a year with no progress; This review should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624343] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Stem-It - Porter's stemming algorithm for Italian
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624343 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-19 21:26:47 EDT --- perl-Lingua-Stem-It-0.02-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Lingua-Stem-It'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Lingua-Stem-It-0.02-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624339] Review Request: perl-Lingua-PT-Stemmer - Portuguese language stemming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624339 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-19 21:30:41 EDT --- perl-Lingua-PT-Stemmer-0.01-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Lingua-PT-Stemmer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Lingua-PT-Stemmer-0.01-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com --- Comment #34 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-19 21:32:00 EDT --- PING It's been almost a year with no progress; This review should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624342] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Stem-Fr - Perl French Stemming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624342 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-19 21:36:23 EDT --- perl-Lingua-Stem-Fr-0.02-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Lingua-Stem-Fr'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Lingua-Stem-Fr-0.02-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624464] Review Request: perl-Memoize-ExpireLRU - Expiry plug-in for Memoize that adds LRU cache expiration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624464 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-19 21:48:24 EDT --- perl-Memoize-ExpireLRU-0.55-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Memoize-ExpireLRU'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Memoize-ExpireLRU-0.55-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619257] Review Request: rubygem-stomp - Ruby client for the Stomp messaging protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619257 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-19 22:03:05 EDT --- rubygem-stomp-1.1.6-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619257] Review Request: rubygem-stomp - Ruby client for the Stomp messaging protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619257 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-stomp-1.1.6-1.fc14 |rubygem-stomp-1.1.6-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569833] Review Request: drupal6 - An open-source content-management platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569833 --- Comment #22 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2010-08-19 22:04:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) Thanks for figuring out this problem, David. So this spec file should work then? http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/temp/drupal6.spec http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/temp/drupal6-6.19-1.fc13.src.rpm (Posted these to save Jon 5 minutes... every little bit helps, right?) That looks sane on first blush - I'll try it out tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569833] Review Request: drupal6 - An open-source content-management platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569833
--- Comment #23 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2010-08-19 22:31:14 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
Also, one other thing -- we probably need to get file contexts added to the
SELinux targeted policy for the contents of /usr/share/drupal6, /etc/drupal6,
and /var/lib/drupal6. Dan, should I file a separate bug for that? And is
this
something you can add in advance of, or during, a package approval?
since there are only three directories, would it be better/easier to use
semanage like this in %pre?? (I am partially asking this for my own
edification, I don't claim to know the correct answer)
semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_var_run_t %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/ /dev/null
21 || :
semanage fcontext -m -t httpd_var_run_t %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/ /dev/null
21 || :
I don't see this addressed in the packaging guidelines anywhere.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574627] Review request: sunpinyin - A statistical language model based Chinese input method
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574627 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2010-08-19 22:34:04 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(lakshminaras2002@ | |gmail.com) | --- Comment #15 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2010-08-19 23:55:41 EDT --- Ok. I will modify that. I will update and upload the spec file and source rpm by tomorrow. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625491] Review Request: patchelf - A utility for patching ELF binaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625491 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercyp...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-08-19 23:31:17 EDT --- It seems patchelf was already submitted in #602574 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
