[Bug 625678] New: Review Request: ghostscript-chinese - Ghostscript Chinese fonts configuration files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghostscript-chinese - Ghostscript Chinese fonts configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625678 Summary: Review Request: ghostscript-chinese - Ghostscript Chinese fonts configuration files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: p...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ghostscript-chinese/ghostscript-chinese.spec SRPM URL: http://pwu.fedorapeople.org/ghostscript-chinese/ghostscript-chinese-0.3.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: ghostscript font configuration files for Chinese fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625678] Review Request: ghostscript-chinese - Ghostscript Chinese fonts configuration files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625678 Peng Wu p...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i18n-b...@lists.fedoraproje ||ct.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602574] Review Request: patchelf - a utility for patching ELF binaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602574 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2010-08-20 03:12:31 EDT --- *** Bug 625491 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625491] Review Request: patchelf - A utility for patching ELF binaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625491 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE Last Closed||2010-08-20 03:12:31 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2010-08-20 03:12:31 EDT --- I did a typo probably while searching for existing review. Thanks. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 602574 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619395] Review Request: mozc - Opensourced Google Japanese Input
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619395
--- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2010-08-20 03:21:09 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
* License
- So the license for dictionary/ directory is
* mecab-ipadic (for mecab-ipadic)
* BSD (for mecab-naist-jdic)
? If so, mecab-ipadic should also be added into license tag
(note that mecab-ipadic is already registered in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing )
I should added that. fixed.
* BuildRoot
- BuildRoot tag is no longer needed (no longer used) on
Fedora 10+ and EPEL6:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
fixed.
? Obsoletes
- I don't understand why Obsoletes: ibus-mozc 0.11.383.102 is added
to main package although mozc has not existed on Fedora.
not for official one but to fix the package changes on local repo for testing.
* optflags / make build.log more verbose / debuginfo rpm
Okay, fixed in gyp.
? %clean
- Why is it needed to call python build_mozc.py clean after build?
(Note that %_builddir%{?buildsubdir} is deleted after build anyway)
fixed.
* %defattr
- Please set %defattr also for subpackages.
Doh. fixed.
! ppc64 build failure
- By the way your srpm fails to build on F-12 ppc64. It seems that segfault
is
occuring.
/bin/sh: line 1: 8168 Segmentation fault
../mozc_build_tools/linux/gen_connection_data_main --logtostderr
--input=../data/dictionary/connection.txt --make_header
--output=/builddir/build/BUILD/mozc-0.12.434.102/out_linux/Release/obj/gen/converter/embedded_connection_data.h
make: *** [out_linux/Release/obj/gen/converter/embedded_connection_data.h]
Error 139
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2412449
Sure. will have a look though, that may be a bit hard to investigate a kinda
issue if there are no debugging machine.. just for snapshot of fixes:
Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mozc/mozc.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mozc/mozc-0.12.434.102-0.1.20100820svn.fc13.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615577] Review Request: opencc - A library for conversion between traditional and simplified Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615577 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||538278(F14Target) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjo...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2010-08-20 03:42:55 EDT --- Ditto, leave these bugs open. They don't harm anyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 502477] Review Request: arista - Easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 --- Comment #17 from Michael Monreal michael.monreal+b...@gmail.com 2010-08-20 03:46:31 EDT --- Has anyone investigated the FAAC issue? If this is a hard requirement, let's just close this here and get the package into rpmfusion. If it is only loaded if available, let's try to get the package in F14. Also note that there is a new webpage now (http://www.transcoder.org/) as well as a few new releases... the latest is 0.9.5 now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615577] Review Request: opencc - A library for conversion between traditional and simplified Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615577 --- Comment #18 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-08-20 05:05:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) === Issues === 1. The bundled tar.gz does not correspond to the one downloadable from upstream: included in spec: 846166 Aug 10 16:29 opencc-0.1.1.tar.gz upstream: 841739 Aug 12 06:24 opencc-0.1.1.tar.gz.1 It seems upstream updated the file after the src.rpm was created. Please update your source rpm accordingly ( and notify the upstream author that changing the version when the file content changes saves a lot of headaches for everyone). Thanks a lot, manuel! In fact the submitter is also the upstream author, I'll talk to him about this issue. Unfortunately, he'll probably be offline for one month due to freshman's military training. Maybe we need to ask ibus-pinyin maintainer to complete this review request :D Please let me know your FAS name, I will sponsor you. His fas is byvoid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615577] Review Request: opencc - A library for conversion between traditional and simplified Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615577 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #19 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2010-08-20 05:38:05 EDT --- OK, I have just sponsored Chia. Please fix the package so that I can also approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620042] Review Request: dvdbackup - Command line tool for ripping video DVDs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620042 --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2010-08-20 05:50:27 EDT --- Chia, I have sponsored you so now you can proceed to request branches to be created for the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625242] Review Request: clustershell - Efficient cluster administration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625242 --- Comment #3 from Stephane Thiell stephane.thi...@cea.fr 2010-08-20 06:10:36 EDT --- Thank you Terje for this first review. I've been able to fix many things, please take a look at the release 2: Spec URL: http://coral.thiell.com/uploads/fedora/2/clustershell.spec SRPM URL: http://coral.thiell.com/uploads/fedora/2/clustershell-1.3-2.fc11.src.rpm I've also removed the epydoc HTML doc from this RPM as it's pretty big and there is a way to access the library documentation with pydoc. rpmlint result: clustershell.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/clustershell-1.3/Licence_CeCILL-C_V1-fr.txt clustershell.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/clustershell-1.3/Licence_CeCILL-C_V1-en.txt 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 610842] Review Request: meego-panel-devices - Meego devices panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610842 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2010-08-20 06:26:41 EDT --- New Package GIT Request === Package Name: meego-panel-devices Short Description: Meego devices panel Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-14 F-13 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226457] Merge Review: system-config-httpd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226457
--- Comment #11 from Phil Knirsch pknir...@redhat.com 2010-08-20 06:40:22 EDT
---
Hi Parag.
I've had to do revert 1 tiny thing for the final build:
%{_datadir}/kontrol-panel/* is back in as in there is the KDE desktop file,
similar to the one for gnome.
Other than that build has finished successfully:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2409421
Thanks again for the great review,
Regards, Phil
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 473348] Review Request: drraw - Web based presentation front-end for RRDtool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473348 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2010-08-20 06:44:53 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: drraw Short Description: Web based presentation front-end for RRDtool Owners: xavierb Branches: f12 f13 f14 el5 el6 InitialCC: Thanks a lot for the review Rafael :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620039] Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro|nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2010-08-20 06:52:31 EDT --- I am sorry, but due to lack of time I have to abandon this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 --- Comment #7 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com 2010-08-20 07:10:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) PING Since it's been more than a year with no progress; I guess this bug should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? No. It's a package review request. Why would you close it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625476] Review Request: libpath_utils - File-system Path Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625476 --- Comment #6 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com 2010-08-20 07:13:30 EDT --- Regarding the GPL: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html If you are releasing your program under the LGPL, you should also include the text version of the LGPL, usually in a file called COPYING.LESSER. Please note that, since the LGPL is a set of additional permissions on top of the GPL, it's important to include both licenses so users have all the materials they need to understand their rights. The real reason behind including the autotools is future-compatibility with patches. For example, if I opt to backport a fix from the master branch of SSSD that requires a makefile or configure check update, I'll need to run autoreconf for it to work properly. If you want, I can add this in explicitly in advance. I just usually don't bother to have it run autoreconf on any build without patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569833] Review Request: drupal6 - An open-source content-management platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569833 Daniel Walsh dwa...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(dwa...@redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #24 from Daniel Walsh dwa...@redhat.com 2010-08-20 07:40:26 EDT --- No these should be in the policy package. Fixed in selinux-policy-3.8.8-17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 517849] Review Request: mpiwrappers - Environment module wrappers for MPI packages in RHEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517849 --- Comment #4 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-20 07:59:42 EDT --- Jussi, This is a janitorial work on Fedora Package Review queues, -- http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ -- in order to identify and close stalled reviews. I'm just following this policy: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews Please, consider trying a swap review request to get this work reviewed http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 --- Comment #8 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-20 08:00:55 EDT --- Darryl, This is a janitorial work on Fedora Package Review queues, -- http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ -- in order to identify and close stalled reviews. I'm just following this policy: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews Please, consider trying a swap review request to get this work reviewed http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 --- Comment #8 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-20 08:06:15 EDT --- Richard, Same as Bug 479874: This is a janitorial work on Fedora Package Review queues, -- http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ -- in order to identify and close stalled reviews. I'm just following this policy: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-08-20 08:11:55 EDT --- A review ticket without a submitter is useless and needs to be closed. We have few enough reviewers as it is without having them waste time on packages where they will receive no response from the submitter. In any case, if another submitter wants to take up this package, they should open their own review ticket. So this one must be closed in any case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 517849] Review Request: mpiwrappers - Environment module wrappers for MPI packages in RHEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517849 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2010-08-20 08:16:12 EDT --- Well, obviously I'm responsive. Furthermore, the reviewer part only applies to someone who has assigned her/himself to a review and then went missing, so that s/he can be taken off the review and the review bug be returned to an available state. A stalled review is something where the submitter is not responding. Instead of closing down active bugs to shorten the queue, you can actually do something helpful by doing reviews yourself... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-08-20 08:28:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) I'm just following this policy: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews This says that if the submitter has not replied to the comment by the other person for more than one months + one week, the bug will be closed. For this bug no person other than the submitter (Darryl) has not posted any comments (unless you wrote some comments today), so the reporter is not not responding to the comments by other person and stalled package reviews policy cannot be applied here. Rafael, if you want you can review this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625476] Review Request: libpath_utils - File-system Path Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625476 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(alexisis-pristont ||a...@hotmail.com) --- Comment #7 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com 2010-08-20 08:31:38 EDT --- On further reflection, I think you're right. I can add the dependencies later if and when it becomes necessary. New Spec: http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/ding-libs/libpath_utils.spec New SRPM: http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/ding-libs/libpath_utils-0.2.1-4.fc13.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2414172 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 517849] Review Request: mpiwrappers - Environment module wrappers for MPI packages in RHEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517849 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-08-20 08:36:58 EDT --- Rafael, you can review this bug if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625476] Review Request: libpath_utils - File-system Path Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625476 Rob Crittenden rcrit...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 517849] Review Request: mpiwrappers - Environment module wrappers for MPI packages in RHEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517849 Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|aqu...@linux.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-20 08:41:46 EDT --- Ok, so I'm assigning this review to myself, and soon I'll be posting a formal review to your package. Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|aqu...@linux.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-20 08:42:55 EDT --- Ok, so I'm assigning this review to myself, and soon I'll be posting a formal review to this package. Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #19 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2010-08-20 08:43:16 EDT --- Does adding NotReady to the Whiteboard help? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2010-08-20 08:43:05 EDT --- Does adding NotReady to the Whiteboard help? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-08-20 08:46:12 EDT --- If you really want to, fine, but someone will just close notready bugs eventually anyway. Isn't it far easier to find these submitted but abandoned tickets by following the FE-DEADREVIEW tracker anyway? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588474] Review Request: rubygem-rubyzip - zipfile support in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588474 Jesus M. Rodriguez jes...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(jes...@redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #20 from Jesus M. Rodriguez jes...@redhat.com 2010-08-20 08:52:45 EDT --- sorry for the delay. I'm working on the items from comment #16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625476] Review Request: libpath_utils - File-system Path Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625476 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com 2010-08-20 08:53:19 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libpath_utils Short Description: File-system path utilities Owners: sgallagh Branches: f13 f14 InitialCC: dpal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596461] Review Request: lzma - SDK for lzma compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-08-20 08:59:47 EDT ---
I think what I've done here, and how I use if with UPX, works well. I put the
files in %{_datadir}, then have UPX BR it and point the build at it, and it
works.
Toshio, if you don't object, I'll go ahead with SevenZip then.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625476] Review Request: libpath_utils - File-system Path Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625476 Lameire Alexis alexisis-pristont...@hotmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(alexisis-pristont | |a...@hotmail.com)| --- Comment #9 from Lameire Alexis alexisis-pristont...@hotmail.com 2010-08-20 09:12:38 EDT --- thanks a lot for these enlightenments, i understand better why you include also the GPL. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546445] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check-updates - A Nagios plugin to check if Red Hat or Fedora system is up-to-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546445 --- Comment #7 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt 2010-08-20 10:12:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) I cannot connect to your server. The machine is back. You should be able to download the source rpm. I also mirrored the source rpms to * ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/ /jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622904] Review Request: rubygem-state_machine - Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622904 --- Comment #6 from Guillermo Gómez guillermo.go...@gmail.com 2010-08-20 10:14:56 EDT --- Any news on this review? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622904] Review Request: rubygem-state_machine - Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622904 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-08-20 10:41:57 EDT --- rubygem-state_machine-doc.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Documentation files, rdoc, ri, examples and tests. Just fix that when you import the package. Package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596461] Review Request: lzma - SDK for lzma compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461 --- Comment #27 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2010-08-20 10:47:10 EDT --- No objection to merging the packages. Using the lzma-sdk name and continuing the review here seems like a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625603] Review Request: libaacs - Open implementation of AACS specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625603 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-08-20 10:56:17 EDT --- I'm not sure how we could ever permit this in Fedora, it has the same issues that decss does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625855] New: Review Request: perl-EBook-EPUB - Perl module for generating EPUB documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-EBook-EPUB - Perl module for generating EPUB documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625855 Summary: Review Request: perl-EBook-EPUB - Perl module for generating EPUB documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-EBook-EPUB/perl-EBook-EPUB.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-EBook-EPUB/perl-EBook-EPUB-0.5-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This module permits creating EPUB documents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625854] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-CAPTCHA - Easily create, use, and verify CAPTCHAs in CGI::Application-based web apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-CAPTCHA - Easily create, use, and verify CAPTCHAs in CGI::Application-based web apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625854 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-CAPTCHA - Easily create, use, and verify CAPTCHAs in CGI::Application-based web apps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-CAPTCHA/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-CAPTCHA.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-CAPTCHA/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-CAPTCHA-0.01-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: CGI::Application::Plugin::CAPTCHA allows programmers to easily add and verify CAPTCHAs in their CGI::Application-derived web applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557011] Review Request: clamsmtp - A Daemon to virus scan mail using clamav
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557011 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed|2010-01-20 11:36:19 |2010-08-20 11:48:03 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-08-20 11:48:03 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622904] Review Request: rubygem-state_machine - Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622904 --- Comment #8 from Guillermo Gómez guillermo.go...@gmail.com 2010-08-20 11:53:25 EDT --- Thank u Michael... :) updates requests done for updates-testing with the fix https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/rubygem-state_machine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622946] Review Request: rubygem-bcrypt-ruby - Wrapper Around bcrypt() password hashing algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622946 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(mmo...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-08-20 12:05:16 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 580480] Review Request: ghc-type-level - A type-level library for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580480 --- Comment #13 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2010-08-20 13:07:58 EDT --- The package was/is updated now with removal of ghc_pkg_deps, and ghc_pkg_c_deps. Please do refresh on your browser or clear the cache. Thanks. SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ghc-type-level.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ghc-type-level-0.2.4-4.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #50 from Lorenzo Villani lvill...@binaryhelix.net 2010-08-20 13:49:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #49) Upstream isn't always the best :) In openSUSE itself, the package is called libsatsolver (not libsat-solver nor sat-solver nor satsolver). It's called libsatsolver because they usually prefix library packages with lib, IIRC. [...] In that regard, sat-solver with a dash seems to be a relic name of the repository. The most correct name is, probably, satsolver. It's a generic (and probably misleading) name. Maybe I can rename this package to satsolver now and, should some conflict arise, rename it again later. Suggestions welcome (-: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #51 from Jan Engelhardt jeng...@medozas.de 2010-08-20 14:06:01 EDT --- It's called libsatsolver because they usually prefix library packages with lib, IIRC. So, by that very logic, it should be satsolver-libs in Fedora. (Though the Fedora naming scheme always felt strange. What will be done if you need two versions. libfoo1 and libfoo2 work out, but foo-libs and foo-libs - you see the clash.) satsolver. It's a generic Feel free to suggest; discussion was already started on similar hot topic http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-buildservice/2010-07/msg00179.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 473348] Review Request: drraw - Web based presentation front-end for RRDtool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473348 --- Comment #15 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-20 14:25:31 EDT --- Xavier, Please, consider including man pages for drraw before shipping it to testing, as it is a SHOULD item on review process. Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 --- Comment #11 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-20 14:31:21 EDT --- Darryl, Please, consider the following review: Good: * Package is named projxp which follows the upstream project name * Spec file naming follows package naming * License in sources and spec is GPLv3 which is open source * License text included in the tarball and listed on %file. * Spec is legible and American English * No locale files * No shared libraries * No bundled libraries * Not relocatable * Default permissions are set * Macros used consistently * Package is code * No large documentation * No header files * No static libraries * Not a GUI application * Does not own files or directories from other packages * All filenames are utf8 * Builds in mock (see needswork [3], though) NEEDSWORK: [1] rpmlint complaints: $ rpmlint SPECS/projxp.spec SRPMS/projxp-0.3.0-1.fc13.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/projxp-0.3.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm SPECS/projxp.spec:87: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 8, tab: line 87) projxp.src:87: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 8, tab: line 87) projxp.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/projxp projxp projxp.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/projxp projxp projxp.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/projxp/mongrel.log projxp projxp.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/projxp/mongrel.log projxp projxp.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/projxp/rails.log projxp projxp.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/projxp/rails.log projxp projxp.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/projxp projxp projxp.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/projxp projxp 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings. [2] Source within SRPM **does not** match upstream: * http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/projxp-0.3.0.tgz $ md5sum SOURCES/projxp-0.3.0/projxp-0.3.0.tgz ../Downloads/projxp-0.3.0.tgz bdceb1aeb1df37a06138f93b4e0958f9 SOURCES/projxp-0.3.0/projxp-0.3.0.tgz 1fddf9be4dcd35e1e2a6478935db43df ../Downloads/projxp-0.3.0.tgz [3] Package builds with duplicate file warnings: Processing files: projxp-0.3.0-1.fc13.noarch warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/projxp/doc/AUTHORS warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/projxp/doc/Backlog warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/projxp/doc/COPYING warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/projxp/doc/Contributing warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/projxp/doc/INSTALL warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/projxp/doc/LICENSE [4] Directory /var/projxp, which is HOMEDIR for projxp user, is not created neighter it is owned by the package. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups for further reference. Also, /var is supposed to contain variable data files and logs. [5] Your package should contain man pages for the scripts / configs / usage. Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620794] Review Request: perl-PPIx-Utilities - Extensions to PPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620794 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-20 14:40:27 EDT --- perl-PPIx-Utilities-1.01-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-PPIx-Utilities'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-PPIx-Utilities-1.01-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622293] Review Request: erlang-erlydtl - Django Templates for Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622293 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-20 14:41:43 EDT --- erlang-erlydtl-0.6.0-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update erlang-erlydtl'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-erlydtl-0.6.0-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619395] Review Request: mozc - Opensourced Google Japanese Input
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619395 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 621194] Review Request: python-webdav-library - Object-oriented Python WebDAV client-side library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621194 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mschwe...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2010-08-20 15:27:01 EDT --- Requires(pre): python-icalendar So, you've sneaked in that explicit dependency post review :-( without commenting on it here during review and not in the package %changelog either, and it's an unresolvable dependency for F12, F13 and F14 for more than two weeks. Is anything being done to resolve this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619395] Review Request: mozc - Opensourced Google Japanese Input
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619395
--- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-08-20
15:42:47 EDT ---
Created attachment 440023
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=440023
make build.log verbose
Okay. I tried 0.12.434.102-0.1.20100820svn and at least
ibus-mozc seems to work on F-14.
Then:
? Obsoletes:
- I don't see the need of Obsoletes: ibus-mozc 0.11.383.102 for another
reason. As this srpm creates ibus-mozc subpackage, even if this Obsoletes
does not exist the upgrade path shouldn't be broken.
* build.log / Fedora specific compilation flags
- Still we cannot check if Fedora specific compilation flags are honored
or not from build.log. Would you consider to apply the patch attached
to show the actual command line on build.log?
The result with the attached patch applied is:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2414933
* Directory ownership issue
- The directory %{_datadir}/ibus-mozc/ is not owned by any packages.
* Documents
- At least some documents indicating license information should be added
to %doc for main (mozc) binary rpm.
Would you at least consider to add data/installer/credits_??.html to
%doc?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615153] Review Request: tint2 - A lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615153 --- Comment #8 from Germán Racca gra...@gmail.com 2010-08-20 16:37:52 EDT --- Hi Ankur: Sorry for the delay :( I've packaged tint2 and tintwizard separately. Please find updated files here: SPEC: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/tint2.spec SRPM: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/tint2-0.11-2.fc13.src.rpm Koji build from scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2415326 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625939] New: Review Request: tintwizard - A GUI wizard which generates config files for tint2 panels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tintwizard - A GUI wizard which generates config files for tint2 panels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625939 Summary: Review Request: tintwizard - A GUI wizard which generates config files for tint2 panels Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gra...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/tintwizard.spec SRPM: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/tintwizard-0.3.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This program provides an easy way to produce configs for the popular lightweight panel replacement tint2. By changing appearance settings through an easy to use interface, users will be able to automatically generate a config file for tint2 and apply this to tint2 to preview their design. Koji build from scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2414979 (this package depends on bug 615153) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625939] Review Request: tintwizard - A GUI wizard which generates config files for tint2 panels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625939 Germán Racca gra...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||615153 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615153] Review Request: tint2 - A lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615153 Germán Racca gra...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||625939 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604971] Review Request: jwm - Joe's Window Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604971 --- Comment #5 from Germán Racca gra...@gmail.com 2010-08-20 17:27:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Looks like it's missing $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. Also, since it's supposed to work on GNOME, shouldn't it have a jwm-gnome.desktop? Hi Felipe: How to implement jwm-gnome.desktop? Maybe asking upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 491992] Review Request: mod_falcon - An embedded Falcon interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491992 Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|DEFERRED|NOTABUG --- Comment #9 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2010-08-20 19:09:39 EDT --- Ben Sorry to hear you are not able to proceed with this work by now. I'm moving this ticket to a state where other interested parties can submit the package or take over the review. Best regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617797] Review Request: ranger - A flexible console file manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617797 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-21 00:27:53 EDT --- ranger-1.1.2-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617797] Review Request: ranger - A flexible console file manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617797 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||ranger-1.1.2-2.fc13 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617797] Review Request: ranger - A flexible console file manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617797 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ranger-1.1.2-2.fc13 |ranger-1.1.2-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617797] Review Request: ranger - A flexible console file manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617797 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-21 00:30:44 EDT --- ranger-1.1.2-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
