[Bug 631558] Review Request: arduino - An IDE for Arduino-compatible electronics prototyping platforms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631558
Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||akurt...@redhat.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-09-08
02:30:16 EDT ---
Hi Peter,
I'll do the review and sponsor you.
First problem - Package in fedora should never use jars/classes build outside
Fedora. And your contain jar files in the app/lib folder. To be sure that
you're clean you have to add
find -name '*.class' -exec rm -f '{}' \;
find -name '*.jar' -exec rm -f '{}' \;
after you %setup line. When this jars are removed the build fails with
BUILD FAILED
/home/akurtakov/work/runtime-EclipseApplication/arduino/BUILD/arduino-0019/build/build.xml:41:
The following error occurred while executing this line:
/home/akurtakov/work/runtime-EclipseApplication/arduino/BUILD/arduino-0019/build/build.xml:61:
The following error occurred while executing this line:
/home/akurtakov/work/runtime-EclipseApplication/arduino/BUILD/arduino-0019/core/build.xml:12:
taskdef class PAppletMethods cannot be found
using the classloader AntClassLoader[]
You should also check for any prebuild libraries, remove them and verify they
are build from source.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630754] Review Request: mscgen - Message Sequence Chart Rendering tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630754 --- Comment #6 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2010-09-08 03:41:07 EDT --- OK, the spec file looks fine now. However, the source tarball in your SRPM doesn't match the upstream tarball: $ md5sum mscgen-src-0.18.tar.gz* 2b6cfbabbc8bbc25eb52684410705510 mscgen-src-0.18.tar.gz 0922258a7fb86612bb623c1101260fd0 mscgen-src-0.18.tar.gz.1 You must use the untouched upstream archive to build the package. If it's necessary to modify parts of the sources, add patches to your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 488968] Review Request: fedora-app-install - Fedora application data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 --- Comment #36 from Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com 2010-09-08 04:03:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) The point is - running another program to generate data then stuffing it into an rpm which we then ship out is a bad plan. Just as it was with specspo. Putting this data into the repodata is a better plan. This is the process in generating the data: * explode every rpm containing a desktop file (including selected deps where appropriate) * extract lots of data from the desktop file * copy the icons from the exploded root, converting and *resizing* where required * tarring up the icon tree * pushing the translations and desktop metadata into a sqlite database This takes 4 hours on my laptop to do for fedora, or 30 minutes for rpmfusion. This is not something we want to do every day, for data that probably should only be updated once or twice a release (Ubuntu . So, looking at positives and negatives, for putting it in a package: Package: * Allows us to ship the data on the media, so the user doesn't have to download metadata every time they open the application tool * Allows us to query the database directly, rather than convincing PackageKit [to download us the single chunk of metadata and then import the metadata into the system database, as root] * Means we share the *same tools* as Ubuntu, Suse and Foresight. * Means we don't have to patch KPackageKit which already depends on the system database. * Means we can merge rating stats from other external sources before we ship the data, e.g. the gnome3 application usage stats * It already exists, and someone is willing to maintain the package Metadata: * Allows us to ignore the fact that there are a few different licenses * Means we have to dedicate 4 hours per compose (possibly quicker if you have the rpms locally, but as we've discussed, the builders don't) * We have data changing daily that differs by only a few superficial entries * Means we can't use external data sources, for instance application usage stats * The app-install hooks in yum or PackageKit do not exist, and no-one is willing to write code for them. I've heard lots and lots of stop energy from the yum guys, but nobody has offered to write any code. Also bear in mind: Ubuntu has been shipping app-install-data FOR FIVE YEARS. It works for them as a package. Why do you think they shipped it as a package back then? And still now? They have a very similar infrastructure to us. The biggest point, and the most important from a user experience point of view is that we need to query the application database directly. If we make every query go through PackageKit, then through yum then we've killed our performance. Instead of getting responses back in the required 25ms for search-as-you-type we're talking about latencies of hundreds of milliseconds, or if yum has to check and download new metadata, *seconds*. This sucks and is simply not good enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624660] Review Request: rakudo-star - Rakudo, Perl6-modules, Blizkost and documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624660 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #23 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2010-09-08 03:57:04 EDT --- Great, I've successfully rebuilt it in F-14. There are only two problems, which are not blocker for review: rakudo-star.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary parrot-blizkost rakudo-star.src: W: invalid-url Source1: rakudo.desk.in.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631710] New: Review Request: New version of JDK comming soon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: New version of JDK comming soon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631710 Summary: Review Request: New version of JDK comming soon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jva...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Group: redhat Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631710] Review Request: New version of JDK comming soon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631710 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akurt...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-09-08 05:10:52 EDT --- Please go on and read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#How_to_join_the_Fedora_Package_Collection_Maintainers.3F There are rules that have to followed by EVERYONE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619593] Review Request: topgit - A different patch queue manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619593 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmx.de 2010-09-08 05:26:35 EDT --- Thanks for that informal review! Talked to upstream about man pages. There already was some effort to create man pages from the help texts that are already there, see http://bugs.debian.org/499071. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] New: Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 Summary: Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rhug...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/zif.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/zif-0.1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: * Zif is a simple yum-compatible library that only provides read-only access to the rpm database and the Fedora metadata for PackageKit. * Zif is not designed as a replacement to yum, nor to be used by end users. Output of rpmlint: zif.i686: W: non-standard-group Unspecified zif.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libzif.so.1.0.1 e...@glibc_2.0 zif.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/zif.1.gz 1: warning: macro `\' not defined zif-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) GLib - G Lib, Glib, Gib zif-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GLib - G Lib, Glib, Gib zif.src: W: non-standard-group Unspecified zif.src: W: no-buildroot-tag 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. KOJI build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2454609 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 488968] Review Request: fedora-app-install - Fedora application data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 --- Comment #37 from Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com 2010-09-08 07:01:53 EDT --- We should probably take this to fesco. 'I don't like it, therefore I'll block the package review' is not the right way to decide this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631710] Review Request: New version of JDK comming soon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631710 jiri vanek jva...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2010-09-08 07:28:50 --- Comment #2 from jiri vanek jva...@redhat.com 2010-09-08 07:28:50 EDT --- For now openjdk for fedora will be packaged by Deepak. I will follow standart way to become fedora packager and take this back as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624660] Review Request: rakudo-star - Rakudo, Perl6-modules, Blizkost and documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624660 --- Comment #25 from Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de 2010-09-08 08:11:10 EDT --- New Spec URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/review/rakudo-star.spec.6 or link ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/review/rakudo-star.spec New SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/review/rakudo-star-0.0.2010.08_2.7.0-6.fc13.src.rpm - changed provides/obseletes for rakudo package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624660] Review Request: rakudo-star - Rakudo, Perl6-modules, Blizkost and documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624660 Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624660] Review Request: rakudo-star - Rakudo, Perl6-modules, Blizkost and documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624660 --- Comment #26 from Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de 2010-09-08 08:21:07 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rakudo-star Short Description: Rakudo, Perl6-modules, Blizkost and documentation Owners: gerd Branches: f13 f14 el6 InitialCC: gerd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583236] Review Request: vlc - The cross-platform open-source multimedia framework, player and server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583236 TomasM tomasmiljeno...@hotmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tomasmiljeno...@hotmail.com --- Comment #19 from TomasM tomasmiljeno...@hotmail.com 2010-09-08 08:27:13 EDT --- As an interim measure, can the GUI be excluded? This would only require updating the documentation, as I don't think the ncurses interface supports features such as streaming and dvb. If this is only about the phonon backend, how much of vlc asides from libvlc.so.* is required? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #71 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com 2010-09-08 08:39:12 EDT --- sorry, I just don't seem to find much time for packaging stuff these days :/ it may be better to let someone else take over the package, even. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #42 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com 2010-09-08 08:42:04 EDT --- nic: I'll try and stick a package based on the current RPM Fusion package with the i965 stuff removed here, but it may go faster if you do it and send it to me so I can review it and submit it here. Just predicting my own laziness =) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 Jukka Lehtonen jukka.lehto...@abo.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jukka.lehto...@abo.fi --- Comment #84 from Jukka Lehtonen jukka.lehto...@abo.fi 2010-09-08 08:50:31 EDT --- Hi, (and sorry if this is a wrong place for bug-report) We have a Fedora 13: # uname -a Linux foo.bar 2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jul 23 17:14:44 UTC 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # cat /proc/driver/nvidia/version NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 256.44 Thu Jul 29 01:22:44 PDT 2010 GCC version: gcc version 4.4.4 20100630 (Red Hat 4.4.4-10) (GCC) # rpm -q coot coot-0.6.1-3.20100127svn2740.fc13.x86_64 ... with Samsung 2233RZ and Nvidia 3D Vision glasses. When Coot is set to show a protein molecule and electron density map, and hardware stereo is activated, the density map is not drawn at all. The protein is seen in stereo as expected. For comparison, an older Coot-0.6-pre-1-rev-2334-fc10-i386-python-gtk2 (precompiled binary from upstream) does draw the map in the (quad-buffered OpenGL) stereo-mode as expected. I do suspect the application rather than the build; you don't miss out one wireframe and yet draw others, unless you do something special. Unfortunately, more recent precompiled binaries as well as self-compilations from upstream sources have failed due to missing dependencies on F13.x86_64 (so far), so I haven't verified my assumption. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619593] Review Request: topgit - A different patch queue manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619593 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||maths...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|maths...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2010-09-08 09:36:40 EDT --- I'll take this. Sounds like some things I do every now and then :) . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 488968] Review Request: fedora-app-install - Fedora application data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 --- Comment #38 from seth vidal svi...@redhat.com 2010-09-08 09:52:20 EDT --- This is the process in generating the data: * explode every rpm containing a desktop file (including selected deps where appropriate) * extract lots of data from the desktop file * copy the icons from the exploded root, converting and *resizing* where required * tarring up the icon tree * pushing the translations and desktop metadata into a sqlite database This takes 4 hours on my laptop to do for fedora, or 30 minutes for rpmfusion. This is not something we want to do every day, for data that probably should only be updated once or twice a release 1. the above is only true if you run the generator everytime and you don't cache anything. Outrageously naive, I think. 2. I'm going to talk to Florian about his implementation of the same - I seem to recall it taking substantially shorter amount of tim. 3. There is no requirement that we have to do it everytime the repo is changed. Only if it is changed substantively. So, looking at positives and negatives, for putting it in a package: Package: * Allows us to ship the data on the media, so the user doesn't have to download metadata every time they open the application tool Yah - they'll just have stale data. * Allows us to query the database directly, rather than convincing PackageKit [to download us the single chunk of metadata and then import the metadata into the system database, as root] We don't have to import that metadata as root, now. Yum hasn't had to do that for quite some time. Moreover it's just a sqlite db. * Means we share the *same tools* as Ubuntu, Suse and Foresight. this definitely falls into the IBIWISI category considering we do not seem to be sharing ANY tools with any of these distros to speak of. Metadata: * Allows us to ignore the fact that there are a few different licenses A few? Really? * Means we have to dedicate 4 hours per compose (possibly quicker if you have the rpms locally, but as we've discussed, the builders don't) And you don't need to do this at all if you extract the data from the pkgdb. * We have data changing daily that differs by only a few superficial entries And this is why you cache entries and update the db. * Means we can't use external data sources, for instance application usage stats We can use whatever data sources we want, in fact. * The app-install hooks in yum or PackageKit do not exist, and no-one is willing to write code for them. I've heard lots and lots of stop energy from the yum guys, but nobody has offered to write any code. I think what you've heard from us is years of experience cautioning you from chasing down a blind alley. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 488968] Review Request: fedora-app-install - Fedora application data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 --- Comment #39 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-09-08 10:08:49 EDT --- IMHO, this sort of disagreement is what FESCo is intended to resolve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624023] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624023 Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cwick...@fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cwick...@fedoraproject.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591389] Review Request: po-debconf - Tool for managing templates file translations with gettext
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591389 Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cwick...@fedoraproject.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591388] Review Request: pbuilder - Personal package builder for Debian packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591388 Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cwick...@fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cwick...@fedoraproject.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631874] New: Review Request: liboauth - OAuth library functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: liboauth - OAuth library functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631874 Summary: Review Request: liboauth - OAuth library functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fed...@michelsylvain.info QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/tools/liboauth.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/tools/liboauth-0.9.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: liboauth is a collection of POSIX-c functions implementing the OAuth Core RFC 5849 standard. liboauth provides functions to escape and encode parameters according to OAuth specification and offers high-level functionality to sign requests or verify OAuth signatures as well as perform HTTP requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631874] Review Request: liboauth - OAuth library functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631874 Michel Alexandre Salim fed...@michelsylvain.info changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||624984 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 488968] Review Request: fedora-app-install - Fedora application data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 --- Comment #42 from Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com 2010-09-08 11:17:40 EDT --- However, given that it's not obviously afoul of the packaging guidelines, this would appear to be a FESCo concern. (We ship many many things I think are bad ideas.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 488968] Review Request: fedora-app-install - Fedora application data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 --- Comment #43 from seth vidal svi...@redhat.com 2010-09-08 11:22:37 EDT --- I've got no problem with it going to fesco - I just wanted to make sure it was clear that whether or not this goes in as a package in the distro is the point of the argument and not a side issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614036] Review Request: stdair - C++ Standard Airline IT Library - FE-NEEDSPONSOR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614036 Christophe LACOMBE claco...@amadeus.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||claco...@amadeus.com --- Comment #9 from Christophe LACOMBE claco...@amadeus.com 2010-09-08 11:40:01 EDT --- I am not a sponsor so I can't sponsor you. But there are a few things I noticed. 1) The devel rpm do not install any header, while it is specified in your spec file. This might come from a wrong defined variable pkginclude_HEADERS. 2) As suggested by martin, add the dependency to extracc-devel, then you can remove the one to cppunit-devel as it is part of the extracc spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631898] New: Review Request: fatrat - Feature-rich download manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fatrat - Feature-rich download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631898 Summary: Review Request: fatrat - Feature-rich download manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jvce...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jvcelak.fedorapeople.org/fatrat/fatrat.spec SRPM URL: http://jvcelak.fedorapeople.org/fatrat/fatrat-1.1.2-1.fc15.src.rpm rawhide builds (x86_64, i686): http://jvcelak.fedorapeople.org/fatrat/dist-rawhide scratch builds: dist-rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2455153 dist-f14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2455214 upstream URL: http://fatrat.dolezel.info Description: FatRat is download manager written in C++ and build on top of the Qt4 library. It is rich in features and is continuously extended. Main characteristics: - HTTP(S)/FTP downloads - FTP uploads - RSS feed support + special functions for TV shows and podcasts - BitTorrent support (including torrent creating, DHT, UPnP, encryption etc.) - Torrent search - Support for SOCKS5 and HTTP proxies - RapidShare.com FREE downloads - RapidShare.com uploads - RapidShare.com link verification and folder extraction - RapidSafe link decoding - MD4/MD5/SHA1 hash computing - Remote control via Jabber - Remote control via a web interface Upstream provides 3 plugins: - opensubtitles (packaged as subpackage) - czshare (packaged as subpackage) - unpack (not packaged due to bad license) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631558] Review Request: arduino - An IDE for Arduino-compatible electronics prototyping platforms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631558 --- Comment #2 from Peter Oliver fedoraproject@mavit.org.uk 2010-09-08 11:48:12 EDT --- Thanks. I have updated the package to make sure that these files are removed from the source bundle, and re-make them again afterwards. Spec URL: http://www.triv.org.uk/~mavit/rpm/specs/arduino.spec SRPM URL: http://www.triv.org.uk/~mavit/rpm/fedora-13/SRPMS/arduino-0019-4.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226223] Merge Review: ORBit2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226223 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||panem...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-09-08 12:02:51 EDT --- mtasaka, Can you please review current rawhide package again? I will do the necessary changes in git. I too see -static should be generated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591365] Review Request: libexplain - Library functions to explain system call errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591365
--- Comment #6 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2010-09-08
12:05:19 EDT ---
Here are some (minor) comments:
- Package explain doesn't need to require the base package. libexplain is
picked up automatically as a dependency.
- The %{optflags} are not required in make install
- The manpages are licensed under GPLv3+. Thus, the -devel package should get
the License tag: LGPLv3+ and GPLv3+
- There's an issue in explain_output.3 reported by rpmlint:
libexplain-devel.i686: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/explain_output.3.gz 25: warning: `XX' not defined
You can fix it with the following patch:
--- a/man/man3/explain_output.3
+++ b/man/man3/explain_output.3
@@ -19,10 +19,10 @@
.ds n) explain_output
.TH explain_output 3
.SH NAME
+explain_output \- output error messages
.if require_index \{
-explain_output \- output error messages
+.XX explain_output(3) output error messages
.\}
-.XX explain_output(3) output error messages
.SH SYNOPSIS
.ft CW
#include libexplain/output.h
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629645] Review Request: perl-Math-Base36 - Encoding and decoding of base36 strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629645 FTBFS ft...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616357] Review Request: spamassassin-FuzzyOcr - Spamassassin plugin to identify image spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616357 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 12:29:03 EDT --- spamassassin-FuzzyOcr-3.6.0-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616357] Review Request: spamassassin-FuzzyOcr - Spamassassin plugin to identify image spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616357 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|spamassassin-FuzzyOcr-3.6.0 |spamassassin-FuzzyOcr-3.6.0 |-4.fc14 |-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629645] Review Request: perl-Math-Base36 - Encoding and decoding of base36 strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629645 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|14 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 467418] Review Request: mingw32-libvirt - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418 Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-09-08 13:00:38 --- Comment #23 from Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com 2010-09-08 13:00:38 EDT --- Built into rawhide as mingw32-libvirt-0.8.3-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590680] Review Request: maven-license-plugin - Maven plugin to update header licenses of source files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590680 --- Comment #6 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com 2010-09-08 13:43:14 EDT --- Sure, ill update maven-release first, this one will come next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225235] Merge Review: a2ps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225235 --- Comment #40 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-08 13:53:37 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-08 13:55:17 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226175] Merge Review: mx
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226175 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-08 13:54:59 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624204] Review Request: meego-panel-datetime - MeeGo date and time panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624204 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-08 13:57:22 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614075] Review Request: libqttracker - Qt Bindings for the Tracker media indexing infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614075 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-08 13:56:06 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629014] Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629014 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-08 13:59:58 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624660] Review Request: rakudo-star - Rakudo, Perl6-modules, Blizkost and documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624660 --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-08 13:58:12 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617141] Review Request: gupnp-dlna - A collection of helpers for building DLNA applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617141 --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-08 13:56:49 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 628631] Review Request: rubygem-httparty - Makes HTTP fun! Also, makes consuming restful web services dead easy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628631 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-08 13:58:37 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630054] Review Request: rubygem-facon - Tiny mocking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630054 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-08 14:01:33 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629645] Review Request: perl-Math-Base36 - Encoding and decoding of base36 strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629645 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-08 14:00:52 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630480] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug-base - Core component for fast Ruby debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630480 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-08 14:01:55 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630481] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Command line interface (CLI) for ruby-debug-base
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630481 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-08 14:02:44 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617632] Review Request: openstack-swift - OpenStack Object Storage (swift)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617632 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 14:03:21 EDT --- openstack-swift-1.0.2-5.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openstack-swift'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openstack-swift-1.0.2-5.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 627877] Review Request: jibx - JiBX is a framework for binding XML data to Java objects.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627877 --- Comment #11 from hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com 2010-09-08 14:46:00 EDT --- I made a patch so that those tests are able to find the jar-files and uploaded it again. I hope the patch is ok as it is my first one. At least it compiles flawlessly... Spec URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/jibx/jibx.spec SRPM URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/jibx/jibx-1.2.2-6.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631964] New: Review Request: python_pbs - PBS/Torque python module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python_pbs - PBS/Torque python module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631964 Summary: Review Request: python_pbs - PBS/Torque python module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.tray...@cern.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/pbs_python/pbs_python.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/pbs_python/pbs_python-4.1.0-2.fc13.src.rpm Description: The pbs_python package is a wrapper class for the Torque C library. With this package you now can write utilities/extensions in Python instead of C. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629332] Review Request: GoAccess - Apache web log analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629332 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2010-09-08 15:08:37 EDT --- Hi Marco, it seems your above linked SPEC file already contains the changes requested by David. However, you didn't upload a corresponding SRPM. Please always keep both files in sync, and bump the Release number every time you provide a modified package. Finally, post the URLs of the updated files so that the current reviewers get notified. Here are some further comments: - goaccess 0.3.1 has been released recently. Maybe you want to update the package to the new version. - According to the sources, the license seems to be GPLv2 only. - You can also remove BuildRequires: glibc-devel, pkgconfig, autoconf, automake, and libtool. - In %build, drop the definition of variable CPPFLAGS. It's not required. - Insert blank lines between the %changelog entries to increase legibility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631972] Review Request: plone3 - Plone CMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631972 Nikolay Kim niko...@enfoldsystems.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631972] New: Review Request: plone3 - Plone CMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: plone3 - Plone CMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631972 Summary: Review Request: plone3 - Plone CMS Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: niko...@enfoldsystems.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://svn.enfoldsystems.com/trac/public/export/4306/plone-rpm/plone/plone3.spec SRPM URL: https://svn.enfoldsystems.com/trac/public/export/4306/plone-rpm/plone/SRPMS/plone3-3.3.5-1.src.rpm Description: A powerful, flexible Content Management solution that is easy to install, use and extend Plone lets non-technical people create and maintain information using. only a web browser. Perfect for web sites or intranets, Plone offers. superior security without sacrificing extensibility or ease of use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630054] Review Request: rubygem-facon - Tiny mocking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630054 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 16:15:25 EDT --- rubygem-facon-0.4.1-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-facon-0.4.1-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630054] Review Request: rubygem-facon - Tiny mocking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630054 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630054] Review Request: rubygem-facon - Tiny mocking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630054 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 16:15:30 EDT --- rubygem-facon-0.4.1-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-facon-0.4.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 16:52:28 EDT --- rubygem-mocha-0.9.8-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-mocha-0.9.8-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 16:52:20 EDT --- rubygem-mocha-0.9.8-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-mocha-0.9.8-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 16:52:11 EDT --- rubygem-mocha-0.9.8-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-mocha-0.9.8-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618354] Review Request: cwallpaper - A front end for fbsetbg, Esetroot, feh, and other wallpaper changers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618354
Ralph Lange ralph.la...@bessy.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ralph.la...@bessy.de
--- Comment #1 from Ralph Lange ralph.la...@bessy.de 2010-09-08 17:47:20 EDT
---
Hi Germán,
I had a look at your package, which looks almost fine to me.
General question: You are packaging the 0.3.2 GTK version of cwallpaper, not
the newer versions (0.3.3 - 0.4.2) that are based on fltk, which is also part
of Fedora. What is your reason for this?
Looking at the spec file:
* Your summary could even be more concise and skip the A at the beginning.
* Add rm -rf %{buildroot} to the beginning of the %install section
to get rid of rpmlint's no-cleaning-of-buildroot warning.
The build generates ~12 warnings, none of which seems critical.
Upstream might still be interested in fixing those.
Here's an informal review - I'm still working on my reviewing skills...
$ rpmlint cwallpaper.spec /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/cwallpaper*
cwallpaper.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fbsetbg - setback, subset,
besetting
cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) feh - eh, fee, fen
cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fbsetbg - setback,
subset, besetting
cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetbg - subset,
setback, basset
cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US esetroot - beetroot,
esotropia, restroom
cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US feh - eh, fee, fen
cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetroot - beetroot,
betroths, betroth
cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config - con fig,
con-fig, configure
cwallpaper.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cwallpaper
cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fbsetbg - setback, subset,
besetting
cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) feh - eh, fee, fen
cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fbsetbg - setback,
subset, besetting
cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetbg - subset,
setback, basset
cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US esetroot - beetroot,
esotropia, restroom
cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US feh - eh, fee, fen
cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetroot - beetroot,
betroths, betroth
cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config - con fig,
con-fig, configure
cwallpaper.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 19 warnings.
A manual page is not available, the no-cleaning-of-buildroot warning can be
fixed, all others
seem to be false positives.
I don't see the unstripped-binary-or-object warning that you saw, and the
binary is stripped.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum cwallpaper-0.3.2.tar.gz*
85ca1399e8960097cbb6580dceb47163 cwallpaper-0.3.2.tar.gz
85ca1399e8960097cbb6580dceb47163 cwallpaper-0.3.2.tar.gz.1
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime
[Bug 597725] Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597725 Till Maas opensou...@till.name changed: What|Removed |Added CC||opensou...@till.name --- Comment #6 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2010-09-08 18:14:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) I suggest you to send a mail to fedora-devel to discuss whether firefox entensions are worth to be included in fedora. Currently, very few firefox extensions are packaged and fedora don't have a guideline about this. It was not possible to package fedora extensions until recently afaik and they are valid packages. A guideline for the naming has recently passed: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-09-08/fedora-meeting.2010-09-08-16.01.log.html#l-67 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 621416] Review Request: libgeotiff -- GeoTIFF format library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416 --- Comment #23 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2010-09-08 19:09:42 EDT --- I just sent an e-mail to Abby Findlay, who is the secretary of OGP, who take care of EPSG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604331] Review Request: redshift - Adjusts the color temperature of your screen according to time of day
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604331 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 21:11:37 EDT --- redshift-1.5-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624461] Review Request: perl-Snowball-Norwegian - Porter's stemming algorithm for Norwegian
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624461 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 21:09:26 EDT --- perl-Snowball-Norwegian-1.2-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625939] Review Request: tintwizard - A GUI wizard which generates config files for tint2 panels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625939 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||tintwizard-0.3.4-2.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631972] Review Request: plone3 - Plone CMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631972 Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||robinlee.s...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com 2010-09-08 21:08:31 EDT --- * The package 'plone', though retired, has already been in Fedora. You should request for surviving that package instead of submitting the same package with a different name. Refer to: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/plone * You should submit the latest version of that package for review. The latest version of Plone is 4.0. Refer to: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Plone/ * If you are sponsored, you may help updating Plone for epel5, which needs Plone 3. Refer to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497933 * Will you join the Zope SIG? We are a little group trying to package all Zope programs, including Zope2, Plone, Grok, BlueBream, etc., for Fedora. Refer to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Zope -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625939] Review Request: tintwizard - A GUI wizard which generates config files for tint2 panels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625939 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 21:11:25 EDT --- tintwizard-0.3.4-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624461] Review Request: perl-Snowball-Norwegian - Porter's stemming algorithm for Norwegian
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624461 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Snowball-Norwegian-1.2 |perl-Snowball-Norwegian-1.2 |-2.fc14 |-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604331] Review Request: redshift - Adjusts the color temperature of your screen according to time of day
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604331 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||redshift-1.5-1.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-09-08 21:11:43 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 627088] Review Request: fontik - A Configuration Tool for Font-wise, User-set Fontconfig Rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627088 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 21:15:37 EDT --- fontik-0-0.2.20100825git8e8cea81d.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 627088] Review Request: fontik - A Configuration Tool for Font-wise, User-set Fontconfig Rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627088 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|fontik-0-0.2.20100825git8e8 |fontik-0-0.2.20100825git8e8 |cea81d.fc14 |cea81d.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622946] Review Request: rubygem-bcrypt-ruby - Wrapper Around bcrypt() password hashing algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622946 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 21:19:19 EDT --- rubygem-bcrypt-ruby-2.1.2-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625939] Review Request: tintwizard - A GUI wizard which generates config files for tint2 panels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625939 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|tintwizard-0.3.4-2.fc12 |tintwizard-0.3.4-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622946] Review Request: rubygem-bcrypt-ruby - Wrapper Around bcrypt() password hashing algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622946 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||rubygem-bcrypt-ruby-2.1.2-2 ||.fc13 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607015] Review Request: python-hcs_utils - A collection of useful python snippets for hcs's projects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607015 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-hcs_utils-1.1.1-3.fc ||13 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-09-08 21:21:40 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607015] Review Request: python-hcs_utils - A collection of useful python snippets for hcs's projects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607015 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 21:21:36 EDT --- python-hcs_utils-1.1.1-3.fc13, goobook-1.3-5.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630054] Review Request: rubygem-facon - Tiny mocking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630054 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 21:22:38 EDT --- rubygem-facon-0.4.1-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-facon'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-facon-0.4.1-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624463] Review Request: perl-Snowball-Swedish - Porter's stemming algorithm for Swedish
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624463 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 21:24:18 EDT --- perl-Snowball-Swedish-1.2-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624463] Review Request: perl-Snowball-Swedish - Porter's stemming algorithm for Swedish
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624463 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Snowball-Swedish-1.2-2 |perl-Snowball-Swedish-1.2-2 |.fc14 |.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614075] Review Request: libqttracker - Qt Bindings for the Tracker media indexing infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614075 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-09-08 22:08:09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629014] Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629014 Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-09-08 22:15:33 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629027] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629027 Bug 629027 depends on bug 629014, which changed state. Bug 629014 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629014 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614297] Review Request: meegotouch-theme - Theme for Meego Touch based applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614297 --- Comment #10 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-09-08 23:03:07 EDT --- New upstream release: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/meegotouch-theme.spec http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/meegotouch-theme-0.20.29-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614297] Review Request: meegotouch-theme - Theme for Meego Touch based applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614297 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||632051 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||614297 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] New: Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 Summary: Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework Product: Fedora Version: 14 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: supercyp...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Qt based MeeGo Touch Framework for developing touch based user interfaces. Links: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/libmeegotouch-0.20.25-1.fc13.src.rpm http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/libmeegotouch.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622313] Review Request: rubygem-crack -- Really simple JSON and XML parsing, ripped from Merb and Rails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622313] Review Request: rubygem-crack -- Really simple JSON and XML parsing, ripped from Merb and Rails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 23:23:38 EDT --- rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622313] Review Request: rubygem-crack -- Really simple JSON and XML parsing, ripped from Merb and Rails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 23:23:47 EDT --- rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #85 from Tim Fenn f...@stanford.edu 2010-09-08 23:33:43 EDT --- git done, packages tagged/built for F13/F14 - just waiting for guile-lib to be tagged/built for EL6. OK to close? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #86 from Tim Fenn f...@stanford.edu 2010-09-08 23:37:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #84) (and sorry if this is a wrong place for bug-report) Ideally, a new bug report should be opened. We have a Fedora 13: # uname -a Linux foo.bar 2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jul 23 17:14:44 UTC 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # cat /proc/driver/nvidia/version NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 256.44 Thu Jul 29 01:22:44 PDT 2010 GCC version: gcc version 4.4.4 20100630 (Red Hat 4.4.4-10) (GCC) # rpm -q coot coot-0.6.1-3.20100127svn2740.fc13.x86_64 ... with Samsung 2233RZ and Nvidia 3D Vision glasses. When Coot is set to show a protein molecule and electron density map, and hardware stereo is activated, the density map is not drawn at all. The protein is seen in stereo as expected. For comparison, an older Coot-0.6-pre-1-rev-2334-fc10-i386-python-gtk2 (precompiled binary from upstream) does draw the map in the (quad-buffered OpenGL) stereo-mode as expected. I do suspect the application rather than the build; you don't miss out one wireframe and yet draw others, unless you do something special. Unfortunately, more recent precompiled binaries as well as self-compilations from upstream sources have failed due to missing dependencies on F13.x86_64 (so far), so I haven't verified my assumption. I don't have a stereo-enabled system to test, but could you bring this up with upstream and see if there is a patch/fix available? If so, I'll be glad to apply it/backport it if need be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629645] Review Request: perl-Math-Base36 - Encoding and decoding of base36 strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629645 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632056] New: Review Request: libsocialweb-qt - Qt4 API for libsocialweb client DBUS interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libsocialweb-qt - Qt4 API for libsocialweb client DBUS interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632056 Summary: Review Request: libsocialweb-qt - Qt4 API for libsocialweb client DBUS interface Product: Fedora Version: 14 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: supercyp...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: libsocialweb-qt is a library that provides a Qt4 API for interacting with libsocialweb via DBUS. Links: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/libsocialweb-qt-0.1.2-1.fc13.src.rpm http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/libsocialweb-qt.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629645] Review Request: perl-Math-Base36 - Encoding and decoding of base36 strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629645 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 23:58:15 EDT --- perl-Math-Base36-0.07-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Math-Base36-0.07-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631972] Review Request: plone3 - Plone CMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631972 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercyp...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-09-09 00:13:19 EDT --- Packging plone is not an easy task, we still wait for the final release of zope 2.13 which is compatible with python 2.7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622313] Review Request: rubygem-crack -- Really simple JSON and XML parsing, ripped from Merb and Rails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-09 00:10:32 EDT --- rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-crack'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
