[Bug 547832] Review Request: procServ - A process server with telnet console and log access
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547832
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2010-09-10
02:10:46 EDT ---
Hi Ralph,
welcome to the packager group. I hope you'll enjoy maintaining and reviewing
packages for Fedora.
Your procServ package is ready now, so we can finish here. The next step is to
request a git repository with the distro branches you're planning to maintain:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-13-x86_64/result/*.rpm
procServ.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US conserver - conserve,
conserves, conserved
procServ.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US localhost - local host,
local-host, localism
procServ.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US conserver - conserve,
conserves, conserved
procServ.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US localhost - local
host, local-host, localism
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
The above spelling errors can be ignored.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum procServ-2.5.1.tar.gz*
a6d3131361189458fc276ca4323efe46 procServ-2.5.1.tar.gz
a6d3131361189458fc276ca4323efe46 procServ-2.5.1.tar.gz.1
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2458825
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: .so files must go in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) ...
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
- seems to work as expected but I tested only superficially
[.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
[.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) should be placed in a -devel pkg.
[.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin ...
[+] SHOULD: your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.
Package APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
[Bug 589866] Review Request: darktable - Utility to organize and develop raw images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589866 --- Comment #32 from Edouard Bourguignon ma...@linuxed.net 2010-09-10 02:20:59 EDT --- Ok I will remove the deletion of the *.a files. For the patch I added the version because I thought the desktop file will be fixed upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561462] Review Request: jaffl - Java Abstracted Foreign Function Layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561462 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-09-10 02:28:21 EDT --- I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589867] Review Request: logcheck - analyzes logfiles and sends email
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de 2010-09-10 02:41:47 EDT --- Thank you Peter! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: logcheck Short Description: analyzes logfiles and sends email Owners: mrunge Branches: f13 f14 devel el5 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578024] Review Request: ingres - Relational DBMS Server and Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578024 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mru...@matthias-runge.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225841] Merge Review: gnome-user-docs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225841 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcla...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225841] Merge Review: gnome-user-docs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225841 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 04:07:00 EDT --- Created attachment 446460 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446460 spec cleanup patch Please allow to commit this patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589866] Review Request: darktable - Utility to organize and develop raw images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589866 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #33 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 04:10:36 EDT --- I'll review it and I can sponsor Edouard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225995] Merge Review: libdaemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225995 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 05:03:44 EDT --- Created attachment 446463 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446463 spec cleanup patch Please commit attached patch which implements some new guideline changes that will clean spec. Or approve to commit this patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225994] Merge Review: libcroco
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225994 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 05:06:52 EDT --- Created attachment 446464 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446464 spec cleanup patch Please commit this patch or allow to commit it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225995] Merge Review: libdaemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225995 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225994] Merge Review: libcroco
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225994 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226006] Merge Review: libgail-gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226006 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226006] Merge Review: libgail-gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226006 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 05:23:49 EDT --- Created attachment 446472 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446472 spec cleanup patch Patch to clean this package. Please commit or approve to commit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561462] Review Request: jaffl - Java Abstracted Foreign Function Layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561462 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-09-10 05:43:32 EDT --- 1. Does it really have to be arch dependent package? I don't see any native code. I assume this should be noarch package, this will also fix the empty debuginfo subpackage, no library and other rpmlint warnings. 2. You are missing BRs: ant-nodeps I'll do official review after I'm sure that the package is noarch, please confirm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618480] Review Request: EmfEngine - Library enabling Qt based applications to export graphics to the EMF format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2010-09-10 06:42:09 EDT --- Ok. I still doubt, but if you are sure - good luck! Package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632554] New: Review Request: python-zope-component - Zope Component Architecture
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-zope-component - Zope Component Architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632554 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-component - Zope Component Architecture Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: robinlee.s...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/python-zope-component.spec SRPM URL: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/python-zope-component-3.9.5-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This package represents the core of the Zope Component Architecture. Together with the 'zope.interface' package, it provides facilities for defining, registering and looking up components. rpmlint results: $ rpmlint ./python-zope-component.spec ./python-zope-component.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install ./python-zope-component.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean ./python-zope-component.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag ./python-zope-component.spec: W: no-%clean-section 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. $ rpmlint ./python-zope-component-3.9.5-1.fc13.src.rpm python-zope-component.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install python-zope-component.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean python-zope-component.src: W: no-buildroot-tag python-zope-component.src: W: no-%clean-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. $ rpmlint ./python-zope-component-3.9.5-1.fc13.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629027] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629027 --- Comment #6 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 08:11:12 EDT --- Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629027] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629027 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|supercyp...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 628202] Review Request: gretl - A tool for econometric analysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628202
--- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 08:13:15
EDT ---
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
- rpmling output isn't silent:
work ~: rpmlint Desktop/gretl-*
gretl.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gretl_x11
gretl.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gretlcli
gretl.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/gretl.desktop value
Application;Science;Econometrics for string list key Categories in group
Desktop Entry does not have a semicolon (';') as trailing character
gretl-debuginfo.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/gretl-1.9.1/plugin/heckit.c
gretl-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.
work ~:
The two 'no-manual-page-for-binary' and one 'no-documentation' messages may be
omitted, while the rest two should be fixed.
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
- The package does not meet the Packaging Guidelines.
-- Lost of *.la files in %{_libdir}/gretl-gtk2
-- Duplicated COPYING file in %{_datadir}/%{name}
-- Empty directory %{_datadir}/%{name}/doc - looks like a leftover.
-- Bundled font files in %{_datadir}/%{name}/fonts
-- Missing Requires: gtksourceview (owner of %{_datadir}/gtksourceview-1.0)
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
-/+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
(GPLv3+) but does not reflect licensing conditions for 'cephes', 'minpack' and
some plugins. Please add them (seems to be a BSD for minpack, MIT for
plugin/mpack, but IANAL).
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL:
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum gretl-1.9.1.tar.bz2*
b46916828132cc6955ed20cf4c9816d17cae3f692368a245d56f8e55f3efda39
gretl-1.9.1.tar.bz2
b46916828132cc6955ed20cf4c9816d17cae3f692368a245d56f8e55f3efda39
gretl-1.9.1.tar.bz2.1
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES:
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture (see koji link above)
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
+ The spec file handles locales properly.
+ The package calls ldconfig in %post and %postun.
+/- The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. In fact I'm not
quite sure because 'plugin/zipunzip' contains portions of zlib - please
unvestigate this.
0 The package isn't designed to be relocatable
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ Header files placed in a -devel package.
0 No static libraries (*.a)
+ The library files that end in .so (without suffix) placed in a -devel
package.
+ devel sub-package requires the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
- The package must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed
in the spec if they are built. See my upper notes.
-/+ The package includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file MUST be properly
installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. Unfortunately it
is simply copied with 'install' utility, so, please use desktop-file-validate
(adds additional BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils) to check that everything is
ok
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
That's all so far. Please comment/fix issues, mentioned above, and I'll
continue.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632342] Review Request: eclipse-mpc - Eclipse Marketplace Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632342 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-09-10 08:24:08 EDT --- Chris, you are supposed to upload a srpm when you open Review bugs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629027] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629027 Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 08:49:44 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-ZODB3 Short Description: Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence Owners: cheeselee Branches: f14 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 547832] Review Request: procServ - A process server with telnet console and log access
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547832 Ralph Lange ralph.la...@bessy.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Ralph Lange ralph.la...@bessy.de 2010-09-10 09:31:30 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: procServ Short Description: Process server with telnet console and log access Owners: ralphlange Branches: f13 f14 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631874] Review Request: liboauth - OAuth library functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631874
--- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim fed...@michelsylvain.info
2010-09-10 10:28:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Only one minor issue in spec:
%{_mandir}/man3/oauth.* should be moved to -devel subacpackage.
Very good point; fixed in the updated package:
Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/tools/liboauth.spec
SRPM URL:
http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/tools/liboauth-0.9.0-2.fc14.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225994] Merge Review: libcroco
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225994 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com 2010-09-10 10:35:31 EDT --- Patch looks fine to me, please commit it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226370] Merge Review: rhdb-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226370 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 10:43:57 EDT --- I had enough waiting here. I will commit above patch and build new package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225841] Merge Review: gnome-user-docs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225841 --- Comment #8 from Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com 2010-09-10 10:52:54 EDT --- Patch looks fine, please commit. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225825] Merge Review: gnome-mount
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225825 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2010-09-10 10:53:24 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 10:53:24 EDT --- This is dead package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632342] Review Request: eclipse-mpc - Eclipse Marketplace Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632342 --- Comment #4 from Chris Aniszczyk z...@redhat.com 2010-09-10 10:57:16 EDT --- Yap, I'll upload an srpm as soon as I have one. It looks like I'm going to have to package the p2 discovery ui work as a separate package so look for that request soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226006] Merge Review: libgail-gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226006 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com 2010-09-10 11:02:23 EDT --- Patch looks great to me, please commit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581181] Review Request: scalpel - Forensic tool for file carving from disk images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581181 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-10 11:15:06 EDT --- scalpel-1.60-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update scalpel'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/scalpel-1.60-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618480] Review Request: EmfEngine - Library enabling Qt based applications to export graphics to the EMF format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 12:30:02 EDT --- Thanks for the review, I'll apply changes in comment#5 when I'm importing this package to git repo. (In reply to comment #15) Ok. I still doubt, but if you are sure - good luck! Package APPROVED. There's several discussion about arch dependent requires in fedora-packaging list, you may be able to find them in mail archives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618480] Review Request: EmfEngine - Library enabling Qt based applications to export graphics to the EMF format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480 --- Comment #17 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 12:36:28 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: EmfEngine Short Description: Library enabling Qt based applications to export graphics to the EMF format Owners: supercyper Branches: f12 f13 f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225815] Merge Review: gnome-desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225815 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 12:40:56 EDT --- Created attachment 446552 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446552 spec cleanup patch Please commit this spec cleanup patch or allow to commit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225823] Merge Review: gnome-menus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225823 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 12:41:56 EDT --- Created attachment 446553 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446553 spec cleanup patch Please commit this spec cleanup patch or allow to commit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225823] Merge Review: gnome-menus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225823 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mcla...@redhat.com, ||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225821] Merge Review: gnome-mag
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225821 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 12:46:11 EDT --- Created attachment 446555 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446555 spec cleanup patch Please commit this spec cleanup patch or allow to commit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626605] Review Request: perl-MIME-Base32 - Encode data similar way like MIME::Base64 does
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626605 Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trem...@tremble.org.uk --- Comment #13 from Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk 2010-09-10 13:07:18 EDT --- @ Paul: Ping, perl-Net-DNS-SEC has turned up as a missing dep in a pushed package in EPEL is there a reason you've not asked for the repo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 628202] Review Request: gretl - A tool for econometric analysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628202 --- Comment #11 from hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com 2010-09-10 13:22:37 EDT --- Ok I hope I have fixed most of the errors. I have wrote an e-mail upstream concerning the questionable files in the plugin directory. Also I asked what the appropriate license is. I added the license where I was sure. Put it into Education because I really wasn't sure which one to choose. Spec URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/gretl/gretl.spec SRPM URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/gretl/gretl-1.9.1-4.fc13.src.rpm Greetings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622173] Review Request: gappa - Prove programs with floating-point or fixed-point arithmetic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622173
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de
--- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2010-09-10
13:58:46 EDT ---
Here are some more notes:
- you can drop the two variable definitions from %configure
- preserve the timestamp of file COPYING
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8
- use macros (%{_bindir}, %{_defaultdocdir}) in %install and %files
- instead of running your own test, I recommend to run the bundled testsuite
(with make check). However, in order to ensure that rpmbuild fails on a
test failure, the Makefile must be slightly adapted.
Here's a quick sed hack, but patching testsuite/Makefile.am accordingly
would be much better:
sed -i 's/\( cat $$logtmp; \\\)/\1\n\texit 1; \\/' testsuite/Makefile
Maybe upstream can add the exit 1 (or something similar) to the sources.
- I suggest to replace the directory %{_defaultdocdir}/doc with the pdf manual
available from the upstream website http://gappa.gforge.inria.fr/gappa.pdf
as the currently installed folders don't contain a usable manual but the
sources required to build the manual. You can also try to build the pdf
file from these sources (requires dblatex and some additional tools).
- drop INSTALL from the docs
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 206820] Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar - Provide a progress meter on a standard terminal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206820 Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trem...@tremble.org.uk Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk 2010-09-10 14:08:15 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Term-ProgressBar New Branches: EL-5 EL-6 Owners: tremble cweyl has previously expressed that he is happy for others to request EPEL branches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 628202] Review Request: gretl - A tool for econometric analysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628202 --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 14:09:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) Ok I hope I have fixed most of the errors. I have wrote an e-mail upstream concerning the questionable files in the plugin directory. Also I asked what the appropriate license is. I added the license where I was sure. Put it into Education because I really wasn't sure which one to choose. Spec URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/gretl/gretl.spec SRPM URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/gretl/gretl-1.9.1-4.fc13.src.rpm Greetings Ok, good. Regarding fonts - I'm not sure that the proper way is simply to remove them w/o adding some new Requires. Please, ensure that fonts removal doesn't hurt usability. That's the last request from me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 14:14:07 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-mime-type New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #47 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 14:31:13 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-haml New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 206820] Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar - Provide a progress meter on a standard terminal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206820 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-10 14:35:54 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 14:34:46 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-rcov New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=180034 Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trem...@tremble.org.uk Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk 2010-09-10 14:36:35 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Font-TTF New Branches: EL-5 EL-6 Owners: tremble nim listed on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatusNo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #48 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-10 14:41:22 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-10 14:40:32 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574979] Review Request: rubygem-bunny - Another synchronous Ruby AMQP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574979 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 14:41:32 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-bunny New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma mkent is aware of request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574977] Review Request: rubygem-amqp - AMQP client implementation in Ruby/EventMachine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574977 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 14:37:33 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-amqp New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-10 14:40:49 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=180034 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-10 14:40:17 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 --- Comment #19 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 14:40:07 EDT --- mkent is aware of request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-10 14:41:38 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 --- Comment #18 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 14:39:23 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-mime-types New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 628202] Review Request: gretl - A tool for econometric analysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628202 --- Comment #13 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2010-09-10 14:41:50 EDT --- Sorry for chiming in. Just a minor additional note: The Group of the devel package should be Development/Libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574977] Review Request: rubygem-amqp - AMQP client implementation in Ruby/EventMachine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574977 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-10 14:46:03 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618480] Review Request: EmfEngine - Library enabling Qt based applications to export graphics to the EMF format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480 --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-10 14:48:18 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574982] Review Request: rubygem-uuidtools - A simple universally unique ID generation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574982 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 14:44:50 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-uuidtools New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma mkent is aware of change request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589867] Review Request: logcheck - analyzes logfiles and sends email
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867 --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-10 14:47:03 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629027] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629027 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-10 14:49:34 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565251] Review Request: coan - A commandline tool for simplifying the preprocessor conditionals in source code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565251 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-10 14:52:00 EDT --- Uh. This package seems to already be in fedora? See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603366 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565251] Review Request: coan - A commandline tool for simplifying the preprocessor conditionals in source code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565251 Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|fedora-cvs? | Last Closed||2010-09-10 15:07:54 --- Comment #15 from Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com 2010-09-10 15:07:54 EDT --- Well, it wasn't when I started this review, and I'm not sure that the right thing happened, as coan != sunifdef. There are incompatible differences, and the package rename may break some people's scripts. However, since it did happen, I'll withdraw the SCM request and close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 408171] Review Request: perl-QWizard - A portable graphical question and answer wizard API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=408171 --- Comment #12 from Wes Hardaker wjhns...@hardakers.net 2010-09-10 15:26:30 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: dnssec-tools New Branches: EL-5 EL-6 Owners: hardaker just adding branches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 408171] Review Request: perl-QWizard - A portable graphical question and answer wizard API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=408171 Wes Hardaker wjhns...@hardakers.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 408171] Review Request: perl-QWizard - A portable graphical question and answer wizard API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=408171 --- Comment #13 from Wes Hardaker wjhns...@hardakers.net 2010-09-10 15:31:22 EDT --- (or should the modern git tag names now be el5 and el6?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:00:55 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-ZenTest New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma mkent is aware of change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:00:04 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-RubyInline New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma mkent is aware of change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529799] Review Request: rubygem-abstract - Allows you to define an abstract method in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529799 --- Comment #8 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:07:33 EDT --- mkent is aware of change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529799] Review Request: rubygem-abstract - Allows you to define an abstract method in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529799 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:07:04 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-abstract New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 531408] Review Request: rubygem-archive-tar-minitar - Provides POSIX tar archive management from Ruby programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531408 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:10:51 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-archive-tar-minitar New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma mkent is aware of change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530275] Review Request: rubygem-erubis - A fast and extensible eRuby implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530275 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:14:06 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-erubis New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma mkent is aware of change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 525989] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525989 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:15:32 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-extlib New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma mkent is aware of request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557021] Review Request: rubygem-merb-gen - Application and plugin generator scripts for Merb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557021 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:18:27 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-merb-gen New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma mkent is aware of request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549286] Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549286 --- Comment #13 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:17:05 EDT --- mkent is aware of request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549286] Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549286 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:16:49 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: mkent New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576469] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-authentication - Simple per-request authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576469 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:23:01 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-mixlib-authentication New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma mkent is aware of request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 526179] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-cli - Simple ruby mixin for CLI interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526179 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:24:02 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-mixlib-cli New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma mkent is aware of request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617228] Review Request: rubygem-rack1 -- Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617228
Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||trem...@tremble.org.uk
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|trem...@tremble.org.uk
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk 2010-09-10 16:26:34
EDT ---
- = N/A
/ = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[/] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[/] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[/] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Language specific
items
[/] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2460275
[!] Rpmlint output:
rubygem-rack1.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1-1 ['1.1.0-1.el5',
'1.1.0-1']
rubygem-rack1.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/rack-1.1.0/ri/Rack/Response/Helpers/include%3f-i.yaml
%3f
...
rubygem-rack1.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/rack-1.1.0/ri/Rack/Request/xhr%3f-i.yaml %3f
rubygem-rack1.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rackup
rubygem-rack1.src:61: W: macro-in-comment %{gemdir}
rubygem-rack1.src:61: W: macro-in-comment %{_bindir}
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 69 warnings.
[/] Package is not relocatable.
[/] Buildroot is correct ( Not needed if = EL6 and = F13 )
Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[/] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[/] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: MIT
[/] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[-] With any Subpackage installed the license must also be installed (this may
belong to another subpackage)
[/] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[/] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
Both md5sums are f5ff2d6d348f41bb3833847223f792ce
[/] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[/] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[/] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[/] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[/] Permissions on files are set properly.
[/] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. ( Not
needed if = EL6 and = F13 )
[/] Package consistently uses macros.
[/] Package contains code, or permissible content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[/] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[/] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== Ruby Specific ===
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby
[/] BuildRequire Ruby (pulled in by BR rubygem)
[/] Requires: ruby(abi) = ...
[/] Ruby Gems must be called rubygem-%{gemname}
[/] The package must have a Requires and a BuildRequires on rubygems
[/] The package must provide rubygem(%{gemname})
[/] The %prep and %build sections of the specfile should be empty
[/] The Gem must be installed into %{gemdir}
[ %global gemdir %(ruby -rubygems -e 'puts Gem::dir' 2/dev/null) ]
[/] The install should be performed with the command
[ gem install --local --install-dir %{buildroot}%{gemdir} --force
%{SOURCE0} ]
[/]The package must own the following files and directories:
[/] %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/
[/] %{gemdir}/cache/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem
[/] %{gemdir}/specifications/%{gemname}-%{version}.gemspec
[-] Architecture-specific content must not be installed into %{gemdir}
[/] If the Gem only
[Bug 526180] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-config - Simple ruby config mixin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526180 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:26:26 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-mixlib-config New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma mkent is aware of request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574981] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - A unified interface to key/value stores
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574981 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:31:22 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-moneta New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma mkent is aware of request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578480] Review Request: spectrum - XMPP transport/gateway
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480 --- Comment #62 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-10 16:36:06 EDT --- spectrum-1.4.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:33:11 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-ruby2ruby New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma mkent is aware of request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578480] Review Request: spectrum - XMPP transport/gateway
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|spectrum-0.3.1-1.fc12 |spectrum-1.4.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581181] Review Request: scalpel - Forensic tool for file carving from disk images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581181 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-10 16:36:01 EDT --- scalpel-1.60-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update scalpel'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/scalpel-1.60-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:38:15 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-systemu New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma mkent is aware of the request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 16:36:50 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rubygem-sexp_processor New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: stahnma mkent is aware of request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617228] Review Request: rubygem-rack1 -- Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617228 --- Comment #2 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 17:04:52 EDT --- Working on some cleanup. * This is the latest version in F13. Rawhide needs a bump obviously. * Define to global will be changed. * Tests fail even when installing from rubygems.org. I am not sure why on all of them yet, and will continue to look into it. There are no new failures in this version, but I understand your concern. * Changelog can be gixed. * If I have to start making man pages for every rubygem binary, I am going to need a time machine. I'd love to have them also. * I can fix macros/comments. I'll update again after I have more test data/reasons for failure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624833] Review Request: dhcp_probe - Tool for discover DHCP and BootP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624833 --- Comment #9 from Guillermo Gómez guillermo.go...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 17:22:51 EDT --- Koji builds for F12, F13 and F14. 1. SysV implement condrestart (and try-restart): restart the service if the service is already running, if not, do nothing. minimun implementation suggested: condrestart|try-restart) rh_status_q || exit 0 restart ;; 2. dhcp_probe..: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/dhcp_probe service default state must be disabled -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625242] Review Request: clustershell - Efficient cluster administration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625242 Stephane Thiell stephane.thi...@cea.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Stephane Thiell stephane.thi...@cea.fr 2010-09-10 17:40:57 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: clustershell Short Description: Python framework for efficient cluster administration Owners: sthiell Branches: f12 f13 f14 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622173] Review Request: gappa - Prove programs with floating-point or fixed-point arithmetic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622173
--- Comment #3 from David A. Wheeler dwhee...@dwheeler.com 2010-09-10
17:43:12 EDT ---
Okay, I have addressed all the issues noted in comment 1 and comment 2.
The updated package is here:
Spec URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/SPECS/gappa.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/SRPMS/gappa-0.13.0-2.fc13.src.rpm
I changed the URL per comment 1.
Regarding comment 2:
- you can drop the two variable definitions from %configure
DONE
- preserve the timestamp of file COPYING
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8
DONE
- use macros (%{_bindir}, %{_defaultdocdir}) in %install and %files
DONE. I also globally defined another macro to clean it up.
- instead of running your own test, I recommend to run the bundled testsuite
(with make check). However, in order to ensure that rpmbuild fails on a
test failure, the Makefile must be slightly adapted.
Here's a quick sed hack, but patching testsuite/Makefile.am accordingly
would be much better:
sed -i 's/\( cat $$logtmp; \\\)/\1\n\texit 1; \\/' testsuite/Makefile
Maybe upstream can add the exit 1 (or something similar) to the sources.
DONE.
I kept my own test and ADDED the bundled testsuite; the more the merrier.
Instead of futzing with Makefile.am directly, I'm using the sed mod,
and have sent an email to the author asking that the upstream makefile
be changed. In the long term it'd be best if *upstream* made the change.
- I suggest to replace the directory %{_defaultdocdir}/doc with the pdf manual
available from the upstream website http://gappa.gforge.inria.fr/gappa.pdf
as the currently installed folders don't contain a usable manual but the
sources required to build the manual. You can also try to build the pdf
file from these sources (requires dblatex and some additional tools).
DONE.
I can't build the PDF easily; it requires tools that aren't packaged.
If someone wants to package THOSE tools up, great.
- drop INSTALL from the docs
DONE.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 587011] Review Request: tboot - uses Intel(R) TXT to perform a measured and verified launch of a kernel/VMM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587011 --- Comment #5 from Joseph Cihula joseph.cih...@intel.com 2010-09-10 18:55:20 EDT --- I have uploaded a new SRPM to http://sourceforge.net/projects/tboot/files/tboot/tboot-20100910-1.fc13.src.rpm/download FYI, the tboot build process now puts its binaries into /usr/sbin instead of /usr/bin. This fixes all of the above comments except the debuginfo package. I changed %build and %install to call make with 'debug=y', which causes the makefiles to compile with '-g' and removes the '-s' from the install commands. However, no debuginfo package is created and rpmlint warns about unstripped binaries. Everything I've been able to find on debuginfo packages seems to indicate that as long as the binaries are compiled with '-g' and not stripped, that 'rpmbuild -ba' should just work to make a debuginfo package. Your wisdom on this is greatly appreciated. (In the case of tboot.gz, the makefile explicitly strips the symbols out itself and creates a tboot-syms file, which it always copies to /boot.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629027] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629027 Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-ZODB3-3.10.0-0.3.b6. ||fc15 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-09-10 23:19:08 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 627638] Review Request: git2cl - Converts git logs to GNU ChangeLog format.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627638 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||git2cl-2.0-0.1.git8373c9f.f ||c14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-09-10 23:30:26 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 545046] Review Request: CVector - ANSI C API for Dynamic Arrays
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545046 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||CVector-1.0.3-1.5Aug09.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-09-10 23:32:56 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226013] Merge Review: libgnomecups
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226013 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Last Closed||2010-09-10 23:36:18 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-09-10 23:36:18 EDT --- Thanks. Built in libgnomecups-0.2.3-8.fc15 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225994] Merge Review: libcroco
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225994 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620556] Review Request: folks - GObject contact aggregation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620556 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-10 23:38:07 EDT --- telepathy-logger-0.1.5-1.fc14, empathy-2.31.90-1.fc14, folks-0.1.14.1-1.fc14, libgee-0.5.2-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
