[Bug 638422] Feature Request: xmlrpc3 update to 3.1.3 (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638422 --- Comment #3 from Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com 2010-09-29 02:04:37 EDT --- N/P duly noted will do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225818] Merge Review: gnome-icon-theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225818 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mcla...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597755] Review Request: openmolar - Open Source Dental Practice Management Software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597755 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(imran...@gmail.co | |m) | Last Closed||2010-09-29 03:16:04 --- Comment #12 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-09-29 03:16:04 EDT --- Closing this as no response from submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225818] Merge Review: gnome-icon-theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225818 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-09-29 03:14:06 EDT --- Created attachment 450383 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=450383 spec cleanup This will fix this package and clean it as per guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 552855] Merge Review: anthy - Japanese character set input library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552855 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Last Closed||2010-09-29 03:17:38 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-09-29 03:17:38 EDT --- Thanks. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630179] Review Request: cloud - Cloud.com CloudStack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630179 Bug 630179 depends on bug 638439, which changed state. Bug 638439 Summary: Version update for this package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638439 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630272] Review Request: ghc-tagsoup - Parsing HTML/XML documents library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630272 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630222] Review Request: ghc-colour - A model for human colour/color perception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630222 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630208] Review Request: ghc-csv - CSV loader and dumper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630208 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@adsllc.com Flag||needinfo?(maths...@gmail.co ||m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638418] Review Request: ehcache (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638418 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akurt...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 04:20:31 EDT --- I can review this one and sponsor you but I have few comments: 1. If we don't have a clear way where are the sources coming from or how to generate the tarball it's a nogo. 2. Choose only one of the build systems either ant or maven. 3. Always provide a unversioned javadoc and remove these post/postun sections for javadoc. 4. Drop gcj-support - we don't need it nowadays. 5. Ehcache has seen big restructuring - http://svn.terracotta.org/svn/ehcache/tags/ and http://ehcache.org/roadmap.html# and http://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/sourceforge-releases/net/sf/ehcache/ehcache/ 6. Update to latest version - 2.2.0 7. Fix file attributes to the defaults for fedora. And this is only from the first sight :). Also if you drop gcj you won't need gnu-crypto. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624471] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger - Part-of-speech tagger for English natural language processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624471 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? Bug 624471 depends on bug 624464, which changed state. Bug 624464 Summary: Review Request: perl-Memoize-ExpireLRU - Expiry plug-in for Memoize that adds LRU cache expiration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624464 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Bug 624471 depends on bug 624465, which changed state. Bug 624465 Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Stem - Stemming of words https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624465 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636209] Review Request: atinject - Dependency injection specification for Java (JSR-330)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636209 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 04:37:25 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: atinject Short Description: Dependency injection specification for Java (JSR-330) Owners: sochotni Branches: f14 devel InitialCC: Change requested due to fedpkg bug 619979 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636209] Review Request: atinject - Dependency injection specification for Java (JSR-330)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636209 --- Comment #10 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 04:49:30 EDT --- Ah, sorry...I got out of bed the wrong way I guess (disregard changes in description and initial CC) Package Change Request == Package Name: atinject Owners: sochotni Branches: f14 devel Change requested due to fedpkg bug 619979 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637134] Review Request: bird - BIRD Internet Routing Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637134 Jan Vcelak jvce...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jvce...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jvce...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jan Vcelak jvce...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 05:06:08 EDT --- I will take this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624471] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger - Part-of-speech tagger for English natural language processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624471
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 05:27:08 EDT ---
Source file is original.
FIX: License is GPLv3, not a perl-like (verified from Tagger.pm).
Summary and Description tags Ok (verified from Tagger.pm).
TODO: Consider INSTALLDIRS=perl and %{perl_privlib}/* as this is the place we
want to move all perl packages in F15 (just formal issue as real path is
identic).
FIX: Add perl(File::Spec) = 0.84 (Build)Requires as the module can be
dual-lived (http://search.cpan.org/search?query=File%3A%3ASpecmode=all) in the
future.
FIX: Replace perl(HTML::Parser) Requires with versioned perl(HTML::TokeParser)
as HTML::TokeParser is used in code. File a bug to upstream to replace
perl(HTML::Parser) dependency with perl(HTML::TokeParser) in Makefile.PL.
FIX: (Build)Require perl(Momoize) = 1.01 (used by Tagger.pm, version specified
in META.yml)
FIX: (Build)Require perl(Storable) = 2.10 (used by Tagger.pm, version
specified in META.yml) as the module can be dual-lived
(http://search.cpan.org/search?query=Storablemode=all) in the future.
All tests pass.
$ rpmlint perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger.spec
../SRPMS/perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-0.16-1.fc13.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-0.16-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean
perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag
perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger.spec: W: no-%clean-section
perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lookup -
lockup, hookup, look up
perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean
perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger.src: W: no-%clean-section
perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lookup -
lockup, hookup, look up
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.
This is post-F12 spec file (no BuildRoot needed). rpmlint output Ok.
TODO: Correct description spelling (use `look-up' as compound adjective).
$ rpm -pqlv ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-0.16-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 zář 29 11:07
/usr/share/doc/perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-0.16
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1605 kvě 11 19:39
/usr/share/doc/perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-0.16/Changes
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 3633 pro 9 2003
/usr/share/doc/perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-0.16/README
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 3556 zář 29 11:07
/usr/share/man/man3/Lingua::EN::Tagger.3pm.gz
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 zář 29 11:07
/usr/share/perl5/Lingua
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 zář 29 11:07
/usr/share/perl5/Lingua/EN
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 zář 29 11:07
/usr/share/perl5/Lingua/EN/Tagger
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot31528 kvě 11 19:39
/usr/share/perl5/Lingua/EN/Tagger.pm
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot26267 zář 29 11:07
/usr/share/perl5/Lingua/EN/Tagger/pos_tags.hash
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1351373 zář 29 11:07
/usr/share/perl5/Lingua/EN/Tagger/pos_words.hash
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot23243 lis 13 2003
/usr/share/perl5/Lingua/EN/Tagger/tags.yml
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 441 lis 13 2003
/usr/share/perl5/Lingua/EN/Tagger/unknown.yml
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 977164 lis 14 2003
/usr/share/perl5/Lingua/EN/Tagger/words.yml
File permissions and location Ok.
$ rpm -pq --requires
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-0.16-1.fc13.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c
1 perl(Carp)
1 perl(FileHandle)
1 perl(File::Spec)
1 perl(HTML::Parser) = 3.45
1 perl(HTML::TokeParser)
1 perl(Lingua::Stem::En)
1 perl(Lingua::Stem) = 0.81
1 perl(Memoize)
1 perl(Memoize::ExpireLRU) = 0.55
1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
1 perl(Storable)
1 perl(strict)
1 perl(warnings)
1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1
1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1
2 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1
Binary dependencies Ok.
$ rpm -pq --provides
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-0.16-1.fc13.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c
1 perl(Lingua::EN::Tagger) = 0.16
1 perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger = 0.16-1.fc13
Binary provides Ok.
Builds on F15 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2496256).
Spec file in line with packaging guidelines.
Please fix all `FIX:' prefixed comments and publish new spec file.
Consider `TODO:' prefixed comments.
Result: NOT APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 587198] Review Request: jgraphx - Java Graph Drawing Component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587198 --- Comment #15 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2010-09-29 06:02:07 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/jgraphx.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/jgraphx-1.4.1.0-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631898] Review Request: fatrat - Feature-rich download manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631898 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-29 06:51:02 EDT --- fatrat-1.1.3-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fatrat-1.1.3-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631898] Review Request: fatrat - Feature-rich download manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631898 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-29 06:52:13 EDT --- fatrat-1.1.3-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fatrat-1.1.3-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633215] Review Request: SimplyHTML - Application and a java component for rich text processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633215 --- Comment #4 from hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com 2010-09-29 07:59:28 EDT --- I fixed it and it builds in koji. SRPM URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/SimplyHTML/SimplyHTML-0.13.1-2.fc14.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/SimplyHTML/SimplyHTML.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638582] New: Review Request: jpanoramamaker -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jpanoramamaker - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638582 Summary: Review Request: jpanoramamaker - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jva...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jpanoramamaker.wz.cz/fedora/jpanoramamaker.spec SRPM URL: http://jpanoramamaker.wz.cz/fedora/jpanoramamaker-5.1.src.tar.gz (or https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2496498) Description: Tool for stitching photos to panorama in linear curved space This is my first package and I'm looking for sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638582] Review Request: jpanoramamaker -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638582 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||akurt...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 08:38:41 EDT --- I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638590] New: Review Request: freemind - a mind-mapping software written in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: freemind - a mind-mapping software written in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638590 Summary: Review Request: freemind - a mind-mapping software written in Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johannes.l...@googlemail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/freemind/freemind.spec SRPM URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/freemind/freemind-0.9.0.rc9-2.fc14.src.rpm Description: FreeMind is a premier free mind-mapping software written in Java. The recent development has hopefully turned it into high productivity tool. So you want to write a completely new metaphysics? Why don't you use FreeMind? You have a tool at hand that remarkably resembles the tray slips of Robert Pirsig, described in his sequel to Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance called Lila. Do you want to refactor your essays in a similar way you would refactor software? Or do you want to keep personal knowledge base, which is easy to manage? Why don't you try FreeMind? Do you want to prioritize, know where you are, where you've been and where you are heading, as Stephen Covey would advise you? Have you tried FreeMind to keep track of all the things that are needed for that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638590] Review Request: freemind - a mind-mapping software written in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638590 hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|633215 |636250 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636250] Review Request: HotEqn - Java Library to display LateX Code - Dependency for Freemind
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636250 hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||638590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633215] Review Request: SimplyHTML - Application and a java component for rich text processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633215 hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|638590 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638590] Review Request: freemind - a mind-mapping software written in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638590 hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||633215 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633215] Review Request: SimplyHTML - Application and a java component for rich text processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633215 hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||638590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633215] Review Request: SimplyHTML - Application and a java component for rich text processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633215 hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||638590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638590] Review Request: freemind - a mind-mapping software written in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638590 hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||501467(and,executable,smpla ||yer,stack), 633215 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638582] Review Request: jpanoramamaker -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638582 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 08:58:24 EDT --- Can you provide the src.rpm file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 627197] Review Request: bluedevil - Bluetooth stack for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627197 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 08:58:32 EDT --- Thanks Radek, bugs are reported upstream - it's still pre-release, it's not going to be default BT stack now for released Fedoras but we need a lot of testing before making it default in F15 (and stable release 1.0). So asking for GIT now before fully sorted out. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: bluedevil Short Description: Bluetooth stack for KDE Owners: jreznik rdieter than kkofler ltinkl Branches: f13 f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226561] Merge Review: xjavadoc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226561 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-09-29 08:58:07 --- Comment #4 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 08:58:07 EDT --- Nice, I consider this package clean and review finished. Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 488968] Review Request: fedora-app-install - Fedora application data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #45 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 09:00:26 EDT --- The absurdity of the license string and the nature of this package having an aggressively changing license with every new release makes it functionally impossible to audit. While an argument could be made that the .desktop files are not copyrightable, the icons clearly are. I'm blocking this against FE-Legal. I would strongly encourage you to work to find a way to not need to bundle all of these icons within a single package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638582] Review Request: jpanoramamaker -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638582 --- Comment #3 from jiri vanek jva...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 09:02:37 EDT --- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2496498name=jpanoramamaker-5-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636819] Review Request: gnome-exe-thumbnailer - gnome thumbnailer for exe files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636819 --- Comment #12 from elad el...@doom.co.il 2010-09-29 09:13:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) Align your spec files. Adjust the tab position like in Done. Suggest you to do unofficial reviews of other packages and post the link here. I will. In other news, upstream released a new version today. They include the license now. New src.rpm: http://elad.fedorapeople.org/gnome-exe-thumbnailer-0.7-0.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638582] Review Request: jpanoramamaker -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638582
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-09-29
09:25:55 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[ ] Rpmlint output:
jpanoramamaker.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jpanoramamaker
jpanoramamaker-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Javadocs -
Java docs, Java-docs, Javanese
Not a problem.
[X] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[X] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[X] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[X] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[X] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[X] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[X] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type:
[X] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[X] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[X] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[X] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[X] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[X] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[X] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[X] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[X] Permissions on files are set properly.
[X] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[X] Package consistently uses macros.
[X] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[X] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[!] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[X] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[X] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[X] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[X] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[X] Package uses %global not %define
[X] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[X] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[X] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
=== Other suggestions ===
[X] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[X] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} with
%{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version} symlink
[X] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[X] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[X] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[X] Latest version is packaged.
[X] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
=== Issues ===
1. Missing desktop file for a GUI application.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225719] Merge Review: efax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225719 --- Comment #2 from Ngo Than t...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 09:36:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) - rpmlint: NOT OK!!! efax.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A program for faxing using a Class 1, 2 or 2.0 fax modem. efax.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/fax fixed in efax-0.9a-8.001114.fc15 - package version: release should start with 0., alpha tag should go to release instead version i don't want to add Epoch, please ignore according to Package Guidelines but as this package can be considered as successor to 0.9 (not pre 0.9) this is OK - requires: make and probably netpbm-progs (?) should be BuildRequires, not Requires, NOT OK!!! make is required for Build - BuildRequires: make netpbm-progs is required to convert to fax format - Requires: netpbm-progs - build flags: missing smp_mflags, custom build flags?, NOT OK!!! fixed in efax-0.9a-8.001114.fc15 Than, please fix/comment issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 09:39:14 EDT --- Name: ok Summary: ok Version Release: ok Group: ok License: ok URL: ok Sources: caedf70a5851e2d1e1e9c282f40c841a ok Patches: do we really need all patches? at least missing-Epoch-function is not needed anymore as we have Qt 4.7, please update Requires BuildRequires: XXX Description: ok Build: not ok + ./configure -prefix /usr -libdir /usr/lib64 -release QTDIR variable was set but could not find /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin/qmake\n If your Qt is in a nonstandard location, try: QTDIR=path to your Qt directory ./configure error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.bm6HwK (%build) PS; could you add me as co-maintainer to MeeGo packages once reviewed? I'm Qt co-maintainer and Fedora Mobility guy from Qt/Plasma Netbook side of evil. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635788] Review Request: nautilus-terminal - Terminal embedded in Nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635788
elad el...@doom.co.il changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||el...@doom.co.il
--- Comment #4 from elad el...@doom.co.il 2010-09-29 09:51:59 EDT ---
i will do an unofficial review.
+ = OK
- = NA
? = issue
+ Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
+ Spec file matches base package name.
+ Spec has consistent macro usage.
+ Meets Packaging Guidelines.
+ License
+ License field in spec matches
+ License file included in package
+ Spec in American English
+ Spec is legible.
+ Sources match upstream md5sum
- Package needs ExcludeArch
+ BuildRequires correct
- Spec handles locales/find_lang
- Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
+ Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
+ Package has a correct %clean section.
+ Package has correct buildroot
+ Package is code or permissible content.
+ Doc subpackage needed/used.
+ Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
- .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
- .so files in -devel subpackage.
- -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
- .la files are removed.
- Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
+ Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
Couldn't check on koji becuase i was unable to login because of an SSL error.
it compiles on my machine.
+ Package has no duplicate files in %files.
+ Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
+ Package owns all the directories it creates.
+ No rpmlint output.
Seems that everything is OK with your package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636819] Review Request: gnome-exe-thumbnailer - gnome thumbnailer for exe files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636819 --- Comment #13 from elad el...@doom.co.il 2010-09-29 09:57:49 EDT --- i've done my first unofficial review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635788#c4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 457808] Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457808 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 10:04:11 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gwibber New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: spot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635981] Review Request: mojo-signatures - Mojo API signatures project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635981 Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||chris.sp...@arcor.de Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de 2010-09-29 10:09:34 EDT --- I'll do this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624833] Review Request: dhcp_probe - Tool for discover DHCP and BootP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624833 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624833] Review Request: dhcp_probe - Tool for discover DHCP and BootP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624833 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-29 10:19:27 EDT --- dhcp_probe-1.3.0-6.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dhcp_probe-1.3.0-6.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635981] Review Request: mojo-signatures - Mojo API signatures project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635981
Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de 2010-09-29 10:35:53 EDT
---
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
mojo-signatures.src: W: invalid-url Source0: mojo-signatures-1.1.tar.xz
SPECS/mojo-signatures.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: mojo-signatures-1.1.tar.xz
- Both Ok, no upstream source releases
mojo-signatures.noarch: W: no-documentation
- Ok, src contains no license for doc
mojo-signatures.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/maven/fragments/mojo-signatures
- false positive
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type:
[ ] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[ ] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[ ] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[ ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[ ] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[ ] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x] Package uses %global not %define
[x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[ ] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[ ] If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[ ] If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven2.jpp.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package uses %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x] Packages have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-utils (for
%update_maven_depmap macro)
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[ ] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} with
%{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version} symlink
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638362] Review Request: mod_python26 - An embedded Python interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638362 --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-09-29 10:49:00 EDT --- Was looking at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#ifmodule If the python26.conf contians IfModule !python_module LoadModule python_module modules/mod_python26.so ... /IfModule So long at /etc/httpd/conf.d/python.conf is processed before python26.conf which is presumably is then the second will always be ignored if the first one exists? The point about if it's ever correct to load both versions is good one. It's certainly confusing. I think there was a thread about this approach somewhere on some list. Will try and find it. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632858] Review Request: emacs-slime - The superior lisp interaction mode for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632858 Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632858] Review Request: emacs-slime - The superior lisp interaction mode for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632858 Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635788] Review Request: nautilus-terminal - Terminal embedded in Nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635788 Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||saga...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com 2010-09-29 10:59:53 EDT --- I will do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635981] Review Request: mojo-signatures - Mojo API signatures project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635981 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 11:08:50 EDT --- Thank you for the review once again. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mojo-signatures Short Description: Mojo API signatures project Owners: sochotni Branches: f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638647] New: Review Request: mom - Dynamically manage system resources on virtualization hosts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mom - Dynamically manage system resources on virtualization hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638647 Summary: Review Request: mom - Dynamically manage system resources on virtualization hosts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: a...@us.ibm.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://github.com/downloads/aglitke/mom/mom.spec SRPM URL: http://github.com/downloads/aglitke/mom/mom-0.2.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: MOM is a policy-driven tool that can be used to manage overcommitment on KVM hosts. Using libvirt, MOM keeps track of active virtual machines on a host. At a regular collection interval, data is gathered about the host and guests. Data can come from multiple sources (eg. the /proc interface, libvirt API calls, a client program connected to a guest, etc). Once collected, the data is organized for use by the policy evaluation engine. When started, MOM accepts a user-supplied overcommitment policy. This policy is regularly evaluated using the latest collected data. In response to certain conditions, the policy may trigger reconfiguration of the system’s overcommitment mechanisms. Currently MOM supports control of memory ballooning and KSM but the architecture is designed to accommodate new mechanisms such as cgroups. For more information see the slides and video from KVM Forum 2010 here: Slides: http://www.linux-kvm.org/wiki/images/e/e8/2010-forum-litke-kvmforum2010.pdf Video: http://vimeo.com/15223652 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637402] Review Request: sqlninja - A tool for SQL server injection and takeover
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637402 Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalc...@redhat.com Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624833] Review Request: dhcp_probe - Tool for discover DHCP and BootP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624833 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-29 11:42:51 EDT --- dhcp_probe-1.3.0-6.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dhcp_probe-1.3.0-6.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638666] New: Review Request: whois - Improved WHOIS client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: whois - Improved WHOIS client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666 Summary: Review Request: whois - Improved WHOIS client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/whois/whois.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/whois/whois-5.0.7-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Searches for an object in a RFC 3912 database. This version of the WHOIS client tries to guess the right server to ask for the specified object. If no guess can be made it will connect to whois.networksolutions.com for NIC handles or whois.arin.net for IPv4 addresses and network names. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2496900 $ rpmlint whois.spec ../SRPMS/whois-5.0.7-1.fc13.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/whois-5.0.7-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm whois.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install whois.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean whois.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag whois.spec: W: no-%clean-section whois.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C WHOIS whois.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US networksolutions - network solutions, network-solutions, counterrevolutions whois.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US arin - rain, ain, Darin whois.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install whois.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean whois.src: W: no-buildroot-tag whois.src: W: no-%clean-section whois.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C WHOIS whois.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US networksolutions - network solutions, network-solutions, counterrevolutions whois.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US arin - rain, ain, Darin 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings. This is post-F12 spec file, thus no BuilRoot defined. The `WHOIS' word is official name of Internet service coinciding with package name. `networksolutions' and `arin' are literal domain names. $ rpm -pqlv ../RPMS/x86_64/whois-5.0.7-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 343 čec 17 2008 /etc/whois.conf -rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot0 zář 29 17:18 /usr/bin/whois -rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot55016 zář 29 17:18 /usr/bin/whois.md drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 zář 29 17:18 /usr/share/doc/whois-5.0.7 -rw-r--r--1 rootroot17992 bře 14 2003 /usr/share/doc/whois-5.0.7/COPYING -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1016 led 28 2010 /usr/share/doc/whois-5.0.7/README -rw-r--r--1 rootroot36433 srp 9 00:58 /usr/share/doc/whois-5.0.7/changelog -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 206 bře 23 2008 /usr/share/doc/whois-5.0.7/copyright -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 9003 zář 29 17:18 /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/whois.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 8730 zář 29 17:18 /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/whois.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 8368 zář 29 17:18 /usr/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/whois.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 9327 zář 29 17:18 /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/whois.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2297 zář 29 17:18 /usr/share/locale/eu/LC_MESSAGES/whois.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 8234 zář 29 17:18 /usr/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/whois.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 9355 zář 29 17:18 /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/whois.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 8349 zář 29 17:18 /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/whois.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 6390 zář 29 17:18 /usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/whois.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 745 zář 29 17:18 /usr/share/locale/no/LC_MESSAGES/whois.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 8620 zář 29 17:18 /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/whois.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 6516 zář 29 17:18 /usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/whois.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot1 zář 29 17:18 /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/whois.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 6454 zář 29 17:18 /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/whois.mo -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 20 zář 29 17:18 /usr/share/man/man1/whois.1.gz -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2045 zář 29 17:18
[Bug 638582] Review Request: jpanoramamaker -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638582 --- Comment #5 from jiri vanek jva...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 11:47:15 EDT --- updated SRPM http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2496851name=jpanoramamaker-5-1.fc15.src.rpm in http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2496850 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638582] Review Request: jpanoramamaker -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638582 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 12:07:29 EDT --- There are 2 problems: 1. You haven't added a changelog entry describing your change and haven't bump Release. You have to do that on every change. 2. desktop file and icon are installed as exectables which is wrong. Please use the default permissions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635788] Review Request: nautilus-terminal - Terminal embedded in Nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635788 Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|saga...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634543] Review Request:animal-sniffer - Tools to assist verifying backward compatibility of Java classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634543 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 12:38:47 EDT --- Thank you for the review New Package CVS Request === Package Name: animal-sniffer Short Description: Tools to assist verifying backward compatibility of Java classes Owners: sochotni Branches: f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638666] Review Request: whois - Improved WHOIS client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666 --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 12:50:43 EDT --- ... is there really a reason to have multiple alternatives here? Just pick one and ship one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635788] Review Request: nautilus-terminal - Terminal embedded in Nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635788
Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com 2010-09-29 13:41:38 EDT ---
complete review:
+ = OK
- = NA
? = issue
+ Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
+ Spec file matches base package name.
+ Spec has consistant macro usage.
+ Meets Packaging Guidelines.
+ License
+ License field in spec matches
+ License file included in package
+ Spec in American English
+ Spec is legible.
+ Sources match upstream md5sum:
[zer0c...@gnubox SPECS]$ md5sum nautilus-terminal_0.7_src.tar.gz
68cecfb4cfb818a1dd0ffed759e7122d nautilus-terminal_0.7_src.tar.gz
[zer0c...@gnubox SPECS]$ md5sum
~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/nautilus-terminal_0.7_src.tar.gz
68cecfb4cfb818a1dd0ffed759e7122d
/home/zer0c00l/rpmbuild/SOURCES/nautilus-terminal_0.7_src.tar.gz
- Package needs ExcludeArch
+ BuildRequires correct
+ Spec handles locales/find_lang
- Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
+ Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
+ Package has a correct %clean section.
+ Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ Package is code or permissible content.
- Doc subpackage needed/used.
+ Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
- .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
- .so files in -devel subpackage.
- -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
- .la files are removed.
- Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
+ Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2497104
+ Package has no duplicate files in %files.
+ Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
+ Package owns all the directories it creates.
? No rpmlint output.
- final provides and requires are sane:
(include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =;
rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done
manually indented after checking each line. I also remove the rpmlib junk and
anything provided by glibc.)
SHOULD Items:
+ Should build in mock.
+ Should build on all supported archs
+ Should function as described.
- Should have sane scriptlets.
- Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
+ Should have dist tag
+ Should package latest version
- check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews)
rpmlint output:
-
[zer0c...@gnubox nautilus-terminal-0.7]$ rpmlint
~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/nautilus-terminal-0.7-1.fc13.i686.rpm
nautilus-terminal.i686: E: no-binary
nautilus-terminal.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.
This is not an issue.Looks good to me.
XX APPROVED XX
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635788] Review Request: nautilus-terminal - Terminal embedded in Nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635788
--- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2010-09-29 14:00:21 EDT
---
It might be better to avoid using %ifarch like that as it will break on other
64 bit multilib architectures.
Instead of:
%ifarch x86_64 ppc64
sed -i
's|/usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-2.0|/usr/lib64/nautilus/extensions-2.0|g'
install.sh
%endif
I'd use:
sed -i
's|/usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-2.0|%{_libdir}/nautilus/extensions-2.0|g'
install.sh
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638713] New: Review Request: php-igbinary - Replacement for the standard PHP serializer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-igbinary - Replacement for the standard PHP serializer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638713 Summary: Review Request: php-igbinary - Replacement for the standard PHP serializer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fed...@famillecollet.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/raw/master/php-igbinary/php-igbinary.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-igbinary-1.0.2-1.src.rpm Description: Igbinary is a drop in replacement for the standard PHP serializer. Instead of time and space consuming textual representation, igbinary stores PHP data structures in a compact binary form. Savings are significant when using memcached or similar memory based storages for serialized data. -- Main goal is to enable this serializer in php-pecl-memcached extension. http://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/bdfbe7a7fa23894104cd0747fbe4a26e7ede491c Koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2497271 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 457808] Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457808 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:35:58 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:36:14 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #50 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:35:38 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:36:52 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550105] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Haskell parser library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550105 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:41:14 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550102] Review Request: ghc-mtl - Haskell Monad Transformer Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550102 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:40:46 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 490940] Review Request: mod_pubcookie - A solution for single sign-on authentication to websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490940 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:39:55 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523884] Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:40:33 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574531] Review Request: python26-nose - The nose testing package for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574531 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:42:06 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 627197] Review Request: bluedevil - Bluetooth stack for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627197 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:46:24 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606557] Review Request: python26-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python26
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606557 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:45:09 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615692] Review Request: ghc-gtk - Haskell gtk binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615692 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:45:36 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 --- Comment #38 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:44:28 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634543] Review Request:animal-sniffer - Tools to assist verifying backward compatibility of Java classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634543 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:47:13 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635981] Review Request: mojo-signatures - Mojo API signatures project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635981 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:48:02 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Please do remember to assign reviews to the reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636209] Review Request: atinject - Dependency injection specification for Java (JSR-330)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636209 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:49:40 EDT --- Git done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636947] Review Request: ding-libs - Ding is not Glib assorted utility libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636947 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-29 14:52:25 EDT --- User dpal doesn't seem to be in the packager group? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636947] Review Request: ding-libs - Ding is not Glib assorted utility libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636947 --- Comment #7 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 14:54:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) User dpal doesn't seem to be in the packager group? Sorry, please move dpal to the InitialCC instead -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636947] Review Request: ding-libs - Ding is not Glib assorted utility libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636947 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - BitTorrent Tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 --- Comment #63 from Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-29 15:07:22 EDT --- 1 this makes sense 2 an error while i copy/paste phrases 3 you are right. i will keep it simple next time. no new cvs checkout - just code cleaning and it won't build. Don't know why. I will keep an eye on it. http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/opentracker/opentracker-0-0.13.20100414cvs.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574531] Review Request: python26-nose - The nose testing package for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574531 --- Comment #12 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 16:04:38 EDT --- Thanks! Import done: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=python26-nose.git;a=commitdiff;h=407f389baac432eb506efb7814e114a35a95ce84 Building python26-nose-0.11.1-3.el5 for dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2497504 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574531] Review Request: python26-nose - The nose testing package for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574531 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-29 16:11:39 EDT --- python26-nose-0.11.1-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python26-nose-0.11.1-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574531] Review Request: python26-nose - The nose testing package for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574531 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638590] Review Request: freemind - a mind-mapping software written in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638590 --- Comment #1 from hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com 2010-09-29 16:29:37 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/freemind/freemind.spec SRPM URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/freemind/freemind-0.9.0.rc9-3.fc14.src.rpm Made an extra sub-directory for all freemind jars. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 488968] Review Request: fedora-app-install - Fedora application data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 --- Comment #46 from Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 17:11:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) I would strongly encourage you to work to find a way to not need to bundle all of these icons within a single package. Such as...? Richard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625242] Review Request: clustershell - Efficient cluster administration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625242 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-29 17:22:35 EDT --- clustershell-1.3.2-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625242] Review Request: clustershell - Efficient cluster administration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625242 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|clustershell-1.3.2-1.fc12 |clustershell-1.3.2-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635788] Review Request: nautilus-terminal - Terminal embedded in Nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635788 --- Comment #9 from Hicham HAOUARI hicham.haou...@gmail.com 2010-09-29 17:48:22 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nautilus-terminal Short Description: Terminal embedded in Nautilus Owners: hicham Branches: F-12 F-13 F-14 InitialCC: hicham -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635788] Review Request: nautilus-terminal - Terminal embedded in Nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635788
--- Comment #8 from Hicham HAOUARI hicham.haou...@gmail.com 2010-09-29
17:46:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
It might be better to avoid using %ifarch like that as it will break on other
64 bit multilib architectures.
Instead of:
%ifarch x86_64 ppc64
sed -i
's|/usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-2.0|/usr/lib64/nautilus/extensions-2.0|g'
install.sh
%endif
I'd use:
sed -i
's|/usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-2.0|%{_libdir}/nautilus/extensions-2.0|g'
install.sh
Yes, I already made that locally, thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637402] Review Request: sqlninja - A tool for SQL server injection and takeover
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637402 Hicham HAOUARI hicham.haou...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|hicham.haou...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637402] Review Request: sqlninja - A tool for SQL server injection and takeover
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637402 Hicham HAOUARI hicham.haou...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hicham.haou...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Hicham HAOUARI hicham.haou...@gmail.com 2010-09-29 17:49:24 EDT --- As per our discussion on IRC, I will look If the binary can be built on Fedora. Otherwise, I don't think we can ship them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638786] New: Review Request: guessencoding - Guess encoding of files and return configured reader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: guessencoding - Guess encoding of files and return configured reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638786 Summary: Review Request: guessencoding - Guess encoding of files and return configured reader Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: or...@cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/guessencoding.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/guessencoding-1.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: The purpose of this library is to guess the encoding of files, and retrieve a reader that is properly configured to use the right encoding as guessed. The library is able to recognize the various Unicode encoding variants: * UTF-8 * UTF-16LE - Low Endian * UTF-16BE - Big Endian * UTF-32 If a Unicode encoding isn't recognized, it's an 8-bit encoding. If the 8-bit encoding is not US-ASCII, the default platform 8-bit encoding is assumed whatever it is. However, the library cannot guess between different 8-bit encodings. Only statistical analysis, n-grams and similar techniques specific to each language used in those files can help guessing the encoding, but this is not supported by the library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629326] Review Request: mysql-workbench - A MySQL visual database modeling, administration and querying tool.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629326 --- Comment #25 from Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com 2010-09-29 19:53:17 EDT --- OK. I can not find out you do not push mysql-connector-c++-1.1.0-bzr895 to bodhi for F-13 and F-14. Could you push it now? We can not test to build mysql-workbench on koji. Is rawhide buildroot fixed? I am waiting a new correct build on koji. If we build mysql-workbench on koji, I think I can approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615692] Review Request: ghc-gtk - Haskell gtk binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615692 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-09-29 20:17:27 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2500217 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624471] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger - Part-of-speech tagger for English natural language processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624471 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2010-09-29 23:50:18 EDT --- Thanks for the review Petr. I've fixed the license tag (not sure how I missed that) and added the additional BuildRequires for core modules. I'm not convinced that using INSTALLDIRS=perl is such a good idea; makes it harder if we decide to change the location again in future. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-0.16-2.fc15.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2500587 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629326] Review Request: mysql-workbench - A MySQL visual database modeling, administration and querying tool.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629326 --- Comment #26 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2010-09-30 01:03:28 EDT --- Ticket open for buildroot exception https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4146 Koji scratch build in rawhide (just launch, can't wait for the result) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2500945 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624833] Review Request: dhcp_probe - Tool for discover DHCP and BootP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624833 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-30 01:31:50 EDT --- dhcp_probe-1.3.0-6.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dhcp_probe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dhcp_probe-1.3.0-6.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
