[Bug 634614] Review Request: mingw32-srvany - Utility for creating a service from any MinGW Windows binary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634614 Andrew Beekhof abeek...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abeek...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Andrew Beekhof abeek...@redhat.com 2010-10-25 02:41:19 EDT --- Hi Peter, thanks for the review, we'll get those fixed asap. Regarding the name, RHSrvAny is needlessly Red Hat specific. The upstream project will either be renamed to WinSrvAny or just mingw32-srvany as in the package here (mingw32-WinSrvAny seems needlessly redundant). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593841] Review Request: wicd - Wireless and wired network connection manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593841 --- Comment #50 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 03:19:37 EDT --- Hi everybody, can you please stop these discussions here now and file proper bugs for the remaining problems? This bug deals only with the review but not with functional issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635450] Review Request: docky - MacOS-like docker app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635450 --- Comment #6 from Lukáš Zapletal l...@redhat.com 2010-10-25 03:18:30 EDT --- Hello Rudolf, you are right. I have been investigating this on the weekend and I was wondering why yum tells me there is no mono package. :-) Fixed. http://static.zapletalovi.com/fedora/rpm/docky/2.0.7-2/ $ rpmlint docky-2.0.7-2.fc13.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint docky-2.0.7-2.fc13.i686.rpm docky.i686: E: no-binary docky.i686: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/docky/docky.py 0644L /usr/bin/env docky.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary docky 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. I am still not sure about the second rpmlint error. The docky.py has #!env python in it and this should be ok... Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518316] Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 04:31:50 EDT --- vanessa_adt-0.0.7-6.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vanessa_adt-0.0.7-6.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518316] Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Bug 518316 depends on bug 518315, which changed state. Bug 518315 Summary: Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518316] Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 05:26:51 EDT --- vanessa_adt-0.0.7-6.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vanessa_adt-0.0.7-6.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626701] Review Request: libmikey - A C++ library implementing the Multimedia Internet KEYing protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626701 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|NotReady| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626701] Review Request: libmikey - A C++ library implementing the Multimedia Internet KEYing protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626701 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-25 05:28:47 EDT --- Fixed. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/libmikey.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/libmikey-0.8.0-0.2.20100127svn3750.fc12.src.rpm Koji build for Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2551934 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518316] Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 05:34:24 EDT --- vanessa_adt-0.0.7-6.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vanessa_adt-0.0.7-6.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645186] Review Request: xavante - Lua Web Server with WSAPI support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645186 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-25 05:49:30 EDT --- I'll review it too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645764] Review Request: django-addons - to add plugging functionality in your projects easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645764 Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gia...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2010-10-25 05:53:00 EDT --- Some remarks from a quick glance: 1. summary is too long, should not end with . (see rpmlint) 2. I'd use URL: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/django-addons 3. description is a bit short, see above URL for a longer one 4. Please split long lines to fit 80 cols (again, see rpmlint) 5. Use a full URL for Source, so spectool -g django-addons.spec will get it 6. Always prefer .gz or .bz2 archives when available 7. .py files (or at least the ones I checked) does not include licensing info in the header, upstream should be notified this can later be source of issues. 8. The only licensing info I found (in PKG-INFO) says this is BSD, not ASL 2.0, am I missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645186] Review Request: xavante - Lua Web Server with WSAPI support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645186
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-25 05:59:31 EDT
---
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ rpmlint is not silent, but the only its message is a false positive:
work ~: rpmlint ~/Desktop/xavante-2.2.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
xavante.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Lua - Lu, La, Luna
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
work ~:
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (MIT).
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum xavante-2.2.0.tar.gz*
dade4606fb92ccf45df9b5405d9ff3edd4c9f9da26f53cf83c3b8e0021105700
xavante-2.2.0.tar.gz
dade4606fb92ccf45df9b5405d9ff3edd4c9f9da26f53cf83c3b8e0021105700
xavante-2.2.0.tar.gz.1
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES:
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
0 No shared library files.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
+ The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
0 No header files.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1).
0 No devel sub-package.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518316] Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 06:41:45 EDT --- vanessa_adt-0.0.7-6.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vanessa_adt-0.0.7-6.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518316] Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 --- Comment #12 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2010-10-25 06:49:08 EDT --- Sorry, I forgot about this package. Now built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549980] Review Request: jama - C++ matrix templates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549980 --- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-25 07:10:59 EDT --- Last ping. I'll close this ticket next week if there will be no answer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt - C++ templates for scientific computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 --- Comment #23 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-25 07:11:17 EDT --- Last ping. I'll close this ticket next week if there will be no answer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 613697] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - The Ogg bitstream file format library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613697 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mi...@limbasan.ro --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-25 07:15:08 EDT --- *** Bug 529548 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529569] Review Request: mingw32-speex - MinGW build of the Speex voice compression codec library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529569 Bug 529569 depends on bug 529548, which changed state. Bug 529548 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE Last Closed||2010-10-25 07:15:08 --- Comment #20 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-25 07:15:08 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 613697 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529560] Review Request: mingw32-libvorbis - MinGW build of the libvorbis Vorbis General Audio Compression Codec library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529560 Bug 529560 depends on bug 529548, which changed state. Bug 529548 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537983] Review Request: python-visual - 3D Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-25 10:48:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #1) 2.) It may be nice, if you can create emacs-* subpackages. Yes, indeed. I'll try to provide them (unfortunately I'm not an emacs user, so I can't test them). Unfortunately that was harder that I thought initially. So I'd rather to postpone the creation of (x)emacs sub-packages until someone well-familiar with (x)emacs will step in and help me with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644669] Review Request: ucviewer - A tool for browsing Unicode tables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644669 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644669] Review Request: ucviewer - A tool for browsing Unicode tables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644669 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 10:55:27 EDT --- ucviewer-0.1-0.2.20101019svn4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ucviewer-0.1-0.2.20101019svn4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634608] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-ole - Ruby OLE library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634608 --- Comment #6 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-10-25 11:32:28 EDT --- http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-ruby-ole-1.2.11.1-1.fc15.src.rpm http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-ruby-ole.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225672] Merge Review: cvs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225672 --- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2010-10-25 12:18:10 EDT --- I believe I fixed all objections in cvs-1.11.23-12.fc15. I have also fixed some other issues (like wrong home page URL). The license tag is now BSD and GPL+ and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and zlib because GPLv1 sources does not forbid `any later version' and because `zlib/libpng' license is called `zlib' according Fedora guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637519] Review Request: php-phpunit-PHPUnit-MockObject - Mock Object library for PHPUnit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637519 --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2010-10-25 12:25:55 EDT --- Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-phpunit-PHPUnit-MockObject.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-phpunit-PHPUnit-MockObject-1.0.1-1.remi.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638948] Review Request: erlang-getopt - Erlang module to parse command line arguments using the GNU getopt syntax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638948 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 12:33:57 EDT --- erlang-getopt-0.3-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638948] Review Request: erlang-getopt - Erlang module to parse command line arguments using the GNU getopt syntax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638948 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|erlang-getopt-0.3-2.fc13|erlang-getopt-0.3-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 165572] Review Request: perl-Devel-StackTrace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165572 Steven Pritchard st...@silug.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||st...@silug.org Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Steven Pritchard st...@silug.org 2010-10-25 12:36:34 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Devel-StackTrace New Branches: el6 Owners: steve InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606557] Review Request: python26-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python26
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606557 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python26-sqlalchemy-0.6.4-1 ||.el5 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-10-25 12:37:06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 642856] Review Request: drupal6-flexifilter - Allows non-admins to create their own, configurable custom filters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642856 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 12:35:20 EDT --- drupal6-flexifilter-1.2-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update drupal6-flexifilter'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-flexifilter-1.2-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 490940] Review Request: mod_pubcookie - A solution for single sign-on authentication to websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490940 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 12:38:09 EDT --- mod_pubcookie-3.3.4a-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 490940] Review Request: mod_pubcookie - A solution for single sign-on authentication to websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490940 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|mod_pubcookie-3.3.4a-3.fc14 |mod_pubcookie-3.3.4a-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 165574] Review Request: perl-Params-Validate
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165574 Steven Pritchard st...@silug.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||st...@silug.org Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Steven Pritchard st...@silug.org 2010-10-25 12:38:05 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Params-Validate New Branches: el6 Owners: steve InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518316] Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 12:37:36 EDT --- vanessa_adt-0.0.7-6.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update vanessa_adt'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vanessa_adt-0.0.7-6.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639369] Review Request: gfs2-utils - Fileysystem utilities for the GFS2 Filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639369 Ben Marzinski bmarz...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bmarz...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646573] New: Review Request: rubygem-whiskey_disk - Ruby tool for embarrassingly fast deployments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-whiskey_disk - Ruby tool for embarrassingly fast deployments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646573 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-whiskey_disk - Ruby tool for embarrassingly fast deployments Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastah...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-whiskey_disk.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-whiskey_disk-0.5.3-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Opinionated gem for doing fast git-based server deployments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632970] Review Request: rec-applet - An audio recording applet for the GNOME-desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632970 --- Comment #7 from Cédric OLIVIER cedric.oliv...@free.fr 2010-10-25 13:54:10 EDT --- Thanks a lot for this review. After an upstream request, there is now a branch for 0.2.3 rec-applet release. So you can find here an updated package with the last release and modifications according your lasts comments. Spec file : http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/rec-applet-0.2.3-1/rec-applet.spec SRPM file: http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/rec-applet-0.2.3-1/rec-applet-0.2.3-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634608] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-ole - Ruby OLE library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634608 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-10-25 14:06:38 EDT --- Okay. * Unused macro - Defined macro %ruby_sitelib is used nowhere * BuildRoot - BuildRoot line is no longer used on Fedora and EPEL6. Not blockers This package (rubygem-ruby-ole) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646606] New: Rename review: drupal-workspace - drupal6-workspace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Rename review: drupal-workspace - drupal6-workspace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646606 Summary: Rename review: drupal-workspace - drupal6-workspace Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: l...@jcomserv.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Will be renaming entire drupal stack to drupal6, etc, to support parallell installable drupal7 stack when that's available. SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-workspace/drupal6-workspace-6.x.1.4-2.rc1.fc13.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-workspace/drupal6-workspace.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646608] New: Rename review: drupal-service_links - drupal6-service_links
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Rename review: drupal-service_links - drupal6-service_links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646608 Summary: Rename review: drupal-service_links - drupal6-service_links Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: l...@jcomserv.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Will be renaming entire drupal stack to drupal6, etc, to support parallell installable drupal7 stack when that's available. SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-service_links/drupal6-service_links-6.x.2.0-1.fc13.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-service_links/drupal6-service_links.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634608] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-ole - Ruby OLE library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634608 Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-10-25 14:26:37 EDT --- I'll remove the sitelib for sure. The BuildRoot stuff I leave in because I spend a lot of time in EPEL5 and I don't think it hurts anything. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-ruby-ole Short Description: Ruby OLE library Owners: stahnma Branches: EL5 EL6 F13 F14 F15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646610] New: Rename review: drupal-views - drupal6-views
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Rename review: drupal-views - drupal6-views https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646610 Summary: Rename review: drupal-views - drupal6-views Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: l...@jcomserv.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Will be renaming entire drupal stack to drupal6, etc, to support parallell installable drupal7 stack when that's available. SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-views/drupal6-views-6.x.2.11-1.fc13.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-views/drupal6-views.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 165574] Review Request: perl-Params-Validate
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165574 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-25 14:29:38 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 165572] Review Request: perl-Devel-StackTrace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165572 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-25 14:29:06 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646612] New: Rename review: drupal-date - drupal6-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Rename review: drupal-date - drupal6-date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646612 Summary: Rename review: drupal-date - drupal6-date Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: l...@jcomserv.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Will be renaming entire drupal stack to drupal6, etc, to support parallell installable drupal7 stack when that's available. SRPMS: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-date/drupal6-date-6.x.2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-date/drupal6-date.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646611] New: Rename review: drupal-cck - drupal6-cck
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Rename review: drupal-cck - drupal6-cck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646611 Summary: Rename review: drupal-cck - drupal6-cck Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: l...@jcomserv.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Will be renaming entire drupal stack to drupal6, etc, to support parallell installable drupal7 stack when that's available. SRPMS: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-cck/drupal6-cck-6.x.2.8-1.fc13.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-cck/drupal6-cck.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537983] Review Request: python-visual - 3D Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 --- Comment #35 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-25 14:33:12 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646610] Rename review: drupal-views - drupal6-views
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646610 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||646614 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646612] Rename review: drupal-date - drupal6-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646612 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||646614 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646614] New: Rename review: drupal-calendar - drupal6-calendar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Rename review: drupal-calendar - drupal6-calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646614 Summary: Rename review: drupal-calendar - drupal6-calendar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: l...@jcomserv.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Will be renaming entire drupal stack to drupal6, etc, to support parallell installable drupal7 stack when that's available. SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-calendar/drupal6-calendar-6.x.2.2-2.fc13.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-calendar/drupal6-calendar.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646611] Rename review: drupal-cck - drupal6-cck
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646611 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||646612 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543147] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_image - MinGW Windows port of the Image loading library for SDL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543147 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-25 14:40:32 EDT --- WARNING: mingw-maint is not a valid FAS account. Did you want to setup such an alias/account? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566725] Review Request: gdcm - Grassroots DiCoM is a C++ library to reading/parsing and writing DICOM medical files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566725 --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-25 14:41:54 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625602] Review Request:libbluray - Library to access Blu-Ray disks for video playback
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625602 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-25 14:43:03 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 642995] Review Request: rubygem-deltacloud-client - Deltacloud REST Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642995 Jordan OMara jom...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jom...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jom...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644804] Review Request: apache-commons-parent - Apache Commons Parent Pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644804 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-25 14:48:01 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645181] Review Request: lua-coxpcall - Coroutine safe xpcall and pcall versions for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645181 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-25 14:48:22 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643392] Review Request: pyqtrailer - PyQt4 application to download trailers from apple.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643392 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-25 14:46:40 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644259] Review Request: virt-what - detect if we are running in a virtual machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644259 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-25 14:47:41 EDT --- virtmaint can't be an owner. Did you mean it to be in cc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645183] Review Request: lua-md5 - Cryptographic Library for MD5 hashes for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645183 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-25 14:52:33 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645182] Review Request: lua-copas - Coroutine Oriented Portable Asynchronous Services for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645182 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-25 14:49:29 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645354] Review Request: django-tracking - Django site visitor tracking, including basic blacklisting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645354 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-25 14:56:13 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645185] Review Request: lua-xmlrpc - Lua package to access and provide XML-RPC services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645185 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-25 14:54:04 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 642995] Review Request: rubygem-deltacloud-client - Deltacloud REST Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642995 Jordan OMara jom...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645186] Review Request: xavante - Lua Web Server with WSAPI support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645186 Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2010-10-25 15:15:23 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: xavante Short Description: Lua Web Server with WSAPI support Owners: timn Branches: f12 f13 f14 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 642995] Review Request: rubygem-deltacloud-client - Deltacloud REST Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642995 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(jom...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-10-25 15:26:05 EDT --- Hello, Jordan: As far as I checked FAS, you are not yet a member of packager group. Would you tell me if this is correct? A person who is going to assign review request ticket to him/herself and to review ticket formally must be in packager group and so must be sponsored when becoming a member of packager group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543154] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_mixer - Simple DirectMedia Layer's Sample Mixer Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154 --- Comment #14 from Stefan Riemens fgfs.ste...@gmail.com 2010-10-25 15:36:44 EDT --- As commented by Kevin in this review request (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543147), please use the scm request below. mingw-maint is not a valid FAS account... Sorry for the noise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 230282] Review Request: trang - Multi-format schema converter based on RELAX NG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230282 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #455609|application/octet-stream|application/x-rpm mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543154] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_mixer - Simple DirectMedia Layer's Sample Mixer Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154 --- Comment #15 from Stefan Riemens fgfs.ste...@gmail.com 2010-10-25 15:37:01 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mingw32-SDL_mixer Short Description: MinGW Windows port of Simple DirectMedia Layer's Sample Mixer Library Owners: stefanriemens Branches: f13 f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543147] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_image - MinGW Windows port of the Image loading library for SDL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543147 --- Comment #11 from Stefan Riemens fgfs.ste...@gmail.com 2010-10-25 15:34:55 EDT --- No, I'm sorry. I thought this was the correct way to have all bugs get reported to the mingw mailinglist, which I recalled to be desired. I can't find that instruction anymore though. Please use the the request below. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543147] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_image - MinGW Windows port of the Image loading library for SDL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543147 Stefan Riemens fgfs.ste...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543147] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_image - MinGW Windows port of the Image loading library for SDL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543147 --- Comment #12 from Stefan Riemens fgfs.ste...@gmail.com 2010-10-25 15:35:14 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mingw32-SDL_image Short Description: MinGW Windows port of the Image loading library for SDL Owners: stefanriemens Branches: f13 f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646637] New: Review Request: jnr-netdb - Network services database access for java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jnr-netdb - Network services database access for java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646637 Summary: Review Request: jnr-netdb - Network services database access for java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmo...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jnr-netdb.spec SRPM URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jnr-netdb-1.0.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Network services database access for java Required by JRuby (BZ #561484) This requires jaffl (BZ #561462, which I will be updating momentarily) to work properly $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/jnr-netdb-1.0.1-1.fc13.noarch.rpm \ rpmbuild/SRPMS/jnr-netdb-1.0.1-1.fc13.src.rpm jnr-netdb.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US getservbyname - dynameter jnr-netdb.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US getservbyport jnr-netdb.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US getservbyname - dynameter jnr-netdb.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US getservbyport jnr-netdb.src: W: no-buildroot-tag 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. These can be ignored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561462] Review Request: jaffl - Java Abstracted Foreign Function Layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561462 Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||646637 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646637] Review Request: jnr-netdb - Network services database access for java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646637 Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||561462 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646637] Review Request: jnr-netdb - Network services database access for java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646637 Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||561484 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||646641, 646637 --- Comment #3 from Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2010-10-25 15:51:23 EDT --- Spent a few cycles updating this submission to the latest upstream release 1.5.3, and sorting the dependency situation for this updated package. SPEC URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jruby.spec SRPM URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jruby-1.5.3-1.fc13.src.rpm This new version adds a few new dependencies: - BZ 646637 : jnr-netdb - new dependency - BZ 646641 : bytelist - updated dependency Additionally I will be updating the jaffl (BZ 561462) submission and jffi package in Fedora to respond to feedback and to work with this new JRuby version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225969] Merge Review: kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225969
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tcall...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #13 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-10-25
15:52:39 EDT ---
The kernel is a rather unique package for Fedora. It does a few unique things:
* It makes heavy use of macros, notably, to generate files sections and apply
patches.
* Its Release is dynamically generated.
* It has multiple architecture specific sections
* It has specific conflicts, all to prevent conflicts with older userspace
components.
* It uses the buildroot starting in %prep, in %build, and in %install.
Normally, this would be very bad form, but the complexity of the kernel
actually makes it simpler to permit this use. In any other package, this would
mandate reworking, so please, don't copy this behavior.
With that stated, here is the first part of a review (against rawhide
2.6.36-1.fc15):
== Part 1: rpmlint ==
kernel.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C kernel
kernel.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C kernel
(Given that the Summary is The Linux kernel, I think this is safe to ignore)
kernel.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vmlinuz - drumlin,
Kremlin, kremlin
kernel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vmlinuz - drumlin,
Kremlin, kremlin
kernel-debuginfo-common-x86_64.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
subpackages - sub packages, sub-packages, prepackages
kernel-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US makefiles - make
files, make-files, makefast
kernel-headers.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) glibc - glib, glib c,
glitch
kernel-headers.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userspace -
user space, user-space, users pace
kernel-headers.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glibc - glib,
glib c, glitch
(False positives, safe to ignore)
kernel.src: W: strange-permission merge.pl 0755L
kernel.src: W: strange-permission find-provides 0755L
(Odd permissions, but not faulty. Safe to ignore.)
kernel.src:221: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/debug
(This is the correct debuginfo path for all targets, safe to ignore.)
kernel.src:386: W: macro-in-comment %nobuildarches
kernel.src:432: W: macro-in-comment %post
kernel.src:1002: W: macro-in-comment %{vanillaversion}
kernel.src:1003: W: macro-in-comment %{kversion}
kernel.src:1005: W: macro-in-comment %{kversion}
kernel.src:1883: W: macro-in-comment %{image_install_path}
(Packagers should avoid using macros in comments, but this is a minor error.
The easy fix here is to %% comment out any macros in comments, to prevent
unexpected and random behavior.)
kernel.src:485: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes kernel-smp
(I'm not sure there is an appropriate version here. This one can probably die
off in a release or so anyways.)
kernel.src:757: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes glibc-kernheaders
kernel-headers.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion glibc-kernheaders obsoletes
glibc-kernheaders = 3.0-46
(To resolve these two items, adjust the spec to read: Obsoletes:
glibc-kernheaders 3.0-46)
kernel.src:940: E: use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR
(The kernel's custom patch macro needs to use RPM_SOURCE_DIR, and is exempt
from any restrictions here.)
kernel.src:944: W: deprecated-grep [u'egrep']
kernel.src:1379: W: deprecated-grep [u'egrep']
kernel.src:1576: W: deprecated-grep [u'fgrep']
kernel.src:1602: W: deprecated-grep [u'egrep']
(Should be changed to grep -E or grep -F, as egrep and fgrep are
deprecated.)
kernel.src:975: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep make
INSTALL_FW_PATH=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/firmware firmware_install \
kernel.src:1470: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build mkdir -p
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{debuginfodir}/boot
kernel.src:1471: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build mkdir -p
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{debuginfodir}/%{image_install_path}
kernel.src:1473: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build mkdir -p
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{image_install_path}
kernel.src:1474: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build install -m 644 .config
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/config-$KernelVer
kernel.src:1475: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build install -m 644 System.map
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/System.map-$KernelVer
kernel.src:1479: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build dd if=/dev/zero
of=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/initramfs-$KernelVer.img bs=1M count=20
kernel.src:1482: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build cp arch/$Arch/boot/zImage.stub
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{image_install_path}/zImage.stub-$KernelVer || :
kernel.src:1485: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{image_install_path}/$InstallName-$KernelVer
kernel.src:1486: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build chmod 755
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{image_install_path}/$InstallName-$KernelVer
[Bug 612581] Review Request: spacewalk-backend - Common programs needed to be installed on the Spacewalk servers/proxies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612581 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||623965, 623967, 623964, ||623966 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639369] Review Request: gfs2-utils - Fileysystem utilities for the GFS2 Filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639369 --- Comment #6 from Ben Marzinski bmarz...@redhat.com 2010-10-25 16:00:02 EDT --- spec file needs BuildRequires: libtool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639529] Review Request: apache-commons-pool - rename of jakarta-commons-pool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639529 Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2010-10-25 16:06:05 --- Comment #8 from Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de 2010-10-25 16:06:05 EDT --- Package built, closing. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2553019 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645181] Review Request: lua-coxpcall - Coroutine safe xpcall and pcall versions for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645181 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 16:09:02 EDT --- lua-coxpcall-1.13.0-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-coxpcall-1.13.0-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645181] Review Request: lua-coxpcall - Coroutine safe xpcall and pcall versions for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645181 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 16:09:39 EDT --- lua-coxpcall-1.13.0-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-coxpcall-1.13.0-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645181] Review Request: lua-coxpcall - Coroutine safe xpcall and pcall versions for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645181 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 16:08:25 EDT --- lua-coxpcall-1.13.0-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-coxpcall-1.13.0-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645181] Review Request: lua-coxpcall - Coroutine safe xpcall and pcall versions for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645181 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645182] Review Request: lua-copas - Coroutine Oriented Portable Asynchronous Services for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645182 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645182] Review Request: lua-copas - Coroutine Oriented Portable Asynchronous Services for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645182 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 16:12:42 EDT --- lua-copas-1.1.6-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-copas-1.1.6-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645181] Review Request: lua-coxpcall - Coroutine safe xpcall and pcall versions for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645181 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 16:10:11 EDT --- lua-coxpcall-1.13.0-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-coxpcall-1.13.0-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645182] Review Request: lua-copas - Coroutine Oriented Portable Asynchronous Services for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645182 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 16:12:07 EDT --- lua-copas-1.1.6-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-copas-1.1.6-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645182] Review Request: lua-copas - Coroutine Oriented Portable Asynchronous Services for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645182 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 16:13:14 EDT --- lua-copas-1.1.6-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-copas-1.1.6-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645182] Review Request: lua-copas - Coroutine Oriented Portable Asynchronous Services for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645182 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 16:13:43 EDT --- lua-copas-1.1.6-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-copas-1.1.6-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644804] Review Request: apache-commons-parent - Apache Commons Parent Pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644804 Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2010-10-25 16:23:26 --- Comment #5 from Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de 2010-10-25 16:23:26 EDT --- Package built, closing. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2553112 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645183] Review Request: lua-md5 - Cryptographic Library for MD5 hashes for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645183 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 16:27:00 EDT --- lua-md5-1.1.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-md5-1.1.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645183] Review Request: lua-md5 - Cryptographic Library for MD5 hashes for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645183 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645183] Review Request: lua-md5 - Cryptographic Library for MD5 hashes for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645183 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 16:27:42 EDT --- lua-md5-1.1.2-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-md5-1.1.2-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645183] Review Request: lua-md5 - Cryptographic Library for MD5 hashes for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645183 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 16:30:28 EDT --- lua-md5-1.1.2-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-md5-1.1.2-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645183] Review Request: lua-md5 - Cryptographic Library for MD5 hashes for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645183 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 16:29:51 EDT --- lua-md5-1.1.2-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-md5-1.1.2-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645184] Review Request: lua-wsapi - Lua Web Server API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645184 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 16:35:36 EDT --- lua-wsapi-1.3.4-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-wsapi-1.3.4-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
