[Bug 621017] Review Request: rubygem-scruffy - A powerful, clean graphing library for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621017 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 01:54:11 EDT --- rubygem-scruffy-0.2.6-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 621017] Review Request: rubygem-scruffy - A powerful, clean graphing library for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621017 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-scruffy-0.2.6-2.fc1 |rubygem-scruffy-0.2.6-2.fc1 |3 |4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - The one true awk descended from UNIX V7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nawk-20100523-3.fc12|nawk-20100523-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638402] Review Request: haildb - A relational database in shared library form
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638402 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 02:07:46 EDT --- haildb-2.2.0-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635875] Review Request: mawk - An interpreter for the AWK programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635875 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 02:05:34 EDT --- mawk-1.3.4-5.20100625.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646139] Review Request: KXStitch - tool that creates cross stitch patterns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646139 --- Comment #1 from Golo Fuchert packa...@golotop.de 2010-10-28 02:06:21 EDT --- I found a mistake in the %files section (some directories were not owned by the package) and corrected a typo in the description. Here are the new links: SPEC URL: http://golotop.de/kxstitch.spec SRPM URL: http://golotop.de/kxstitch-0.8.4.1-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635875] Review Request: mawk - An interpreter for the AWK programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635875 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|mawk-1.3.4-5.20100625.fc13 |mawk-1.3.4-5.20100625.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639816] Review Request: cmake-fedora - CMake helper modules for fedora developers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639816 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 02:09:08 EDT --- cmake-fedora-0.2.3-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619237] Review Request: redis - A persistent key-value database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619237 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 02:02:27 EDT --- redis-2.0.3-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641727] Review Request: mingw32-libffi: portable foreign function interface library for Fedora MinGW
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641727 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|mingw32-libffi-3.0.9-1.fc13 |mingw32-libffi-3.0.9-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641727] Review Request: mingw32-libffi: portable foreign function interface library for Fedora MinGW
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641727 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 01:58:31 EDT --- mingw32-libffi-3.0.9-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 586473] Review Request: mg - Tiny Emacs-like editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586473 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|mg-20090107-5.fc12 |mg-20090107-5.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 586473] Review Request: mg - Tiny Emacs-like editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586473 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 02:02:54 EDT --- mg-20090107-5.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638402] Review Request: haildb - A relational database in shared library form
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638402 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|haildb-2.2.0-2.el5 |haildb-2.2.0-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639816] Review Request: cmake-fedora - CMake helper modules for fedora developers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639816 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||cmake-fedora-0.2.3-1.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-10-28 02:09:13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637378] Review Request: rubygem-aws - Ruby gem for all Amazon Web Services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637378 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 02:17:19 EDT --- rubygem-aws-2.3.21-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634258] Review Request: spew - I/O performance measurement and load generation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634258 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|spew-1.0.8-3.fc13 |spew-1.0.8-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634258] Review Request: spew - I/O performance measurement and load generation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634258 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 02:15:08 EDT --- spew-1.0.8-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637378] Review Request: rubygem-aws - Ruby gem for all Amazon Web Services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637378 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-aws-2.3.21-4.fc12 |rubygem-aws-2.3.21-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637378] Review Request: rubygem-aws - Ruby gem for all Amazon Web Services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637378 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 02:14:54 EDT --- rubygem-aws-2.3.21-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637378] Review Request: rubygem-aws - Ruby gem for all Amazon Web Services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637378 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||rubygem-aws-2.3.21-4.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639291] Review Request: erlang-mustache - Mustache template engine for Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639291 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-28 02:56:15 EDT --- All done (templating - template and macro usage consistency): http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-mustache.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-mustache-0.1.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641295] Review Request: rubygem-typhoeus - A library for interacting with web services at blinding speed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641295 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 02:20:15 EDT --- rubygem-typhoeus-0.1.31-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616779] Review Request: rubygem-json_pure - JSON implementation in pure Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616779 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-json_pure-1.4.6-3.f |rubygem-json_pure-1.4.6-3.f |c12 |c14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629326] Review Request: mysql-workbench - A MySQL visual database modeling, administration and querying tool.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629326 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 02:22:24 EDT --- mysql-workbench-5.2.29-1.fc14, mysql-connector-c++-1.1.0-0.4.bzr895.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578135] Review Request: patcher - Quick creation of patches against a project source tree
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578135 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||patcher-0.6-3.fc14 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578135] Review Request: patcher - Quick creation of patches against a project source tree
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578135 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 02:21:47 EDT --- patcher-0.6-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616779] Review Request: rubygem-json_pure - JSON implementation in pure Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616779 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 02:19:26 EDT --- rubygem-json_pure-1.4.6-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626666] Review Request: groonga - An Embeddable Fulltext Search Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=62 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|groonga-1.0.2-7.fc13|groonga-1.0.2-7.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629326] Review Request: mysql-workbench - A MySQL visual database modeling, administration and querying tool.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629326 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|mysql-workbench-5.2.29-1.fc |mysql-workbench-5.2.29-1.fc |13 |14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641295] Review Request: rubygem-typhoeus - A library for interacting with web services at blinding speed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641295 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||rubygem-typhoeus-0.1.31-3.f ||c14 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626666] Review Request: groonga - An Embeddable Fulltext Search Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=62 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 02:23:14 EDT --- groonga-1.0.2-7.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645801] Review Request: erlang-gettext - Erlang internationalization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645801 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-28 03:17:38 EDT --- Ensure consistency in macro usage: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-gettext.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-gettext-2.1.0-0.2.20101022gitb55cb72.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645288] Review Request: erlang-xmlrpc - HTTP 1.1 compliant XML-RPC library for Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645288 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-28 03:21:53 EDT --- Ensure consistency in macro usage: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-xmlrpc.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-xmlrpc-1.13-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639284] Review Request: erlang-neotoma - Erlang library and packrat parser-generator for parsing expression grammars
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639284 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-28 03:26:37 EDT --- Ensure consistency in macro usage: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-neotoma.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-neotoma-1.4-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639684] Review Request: perl-Pegex - Pegex Parser Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639684 Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de 2010-10-28 03:24:58 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Pegex Short Description: Pegex Parser Generator Owners: gerd Branches: f13 f14 el6 InitialCC: gerd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595697] Review Request: ghc-regex-tdfa - Haskell tagged DFA regex engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595697 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 03:43:56 EDT --- Created attachment 456171 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=456171 ghc-regex-tdfa.spec-1.patch Patch to touch up the description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 612076] Review Request: ghc-feldspar-language - Functional Embedded Language for DSP and PARallelism
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612076 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 03:50:25 EDT --- Ah probably 0.3.3 is too new since it requires QuickCheck-2.3, so latest version we can ship currently is 0.3.2, though wonder if it really needs QuickCheck to build or just for tests? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549980] Review Request: jama - C++ matrix templates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549980 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt - C++ templates for scientific computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt - C++ templates for scientific computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DEFERRED Last Closed||2010-10-28 03:55:37 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549980] Review Request: jama - C++ matrix templates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549980 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DEFERRED Flag|needinfo?(talc...@gmail.com | |) | Last Closed||2010-10-28 03:55:47 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 612076] Review Request: ghc-feldspar-language - Functional Embedded Language for DSP and PARallelism
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612076 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(shakthim...@gmail ||.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614299] Review Request: python-ordereddict - Py2.7's new collections.OrderedDict that works in Python 2.4-2.6.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614299 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2010-10-28 04:36:30 EDT --- remaining issues fixed. APPROVED. Note: looks like upstream updated the tarball in place. There's a new upstream 1.1 tarball with a different md5sum and the license file included. I verified the tarball in the srpm matched the old tarball. You might want to update to the new tarball before importing the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 195585] Review Request: tetex-fonts-hebrew
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195585 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 04:45:21 EDT --- You need to specify the owner in the request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543154] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_mixer - Simple DirectMedia Layer's Sample Mixer Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154 --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 04:51:50 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 --- Comment #28 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 04:47:55 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543147] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_image - MinGW Windows port of the Image loading library for SDL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543147 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 04:50:31 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633194] Review Request: ghc-glade - Haskell binding to libglade2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633194 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 04:55:40 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630339] Review Request: python-redis - A Python client for redis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630339 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 04:55:03 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). The review seems a bit terse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639684] Review Request: perl-Pegex - Pegex Parser Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639684 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 05:11:43 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 642995] Review Request: rubygem-deltacloud-client - Deltacloud REST Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642995 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 05:13:16 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645603] Review Request: python-mox - Mock object framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645603 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 05:25:03 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646181] Review Request: rubygem-gio2 - Ruby binding of gio-2.0.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646181 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 05:27:17 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579662] Review Request: emacs-lookup - Search Interface with Electronic Dictionaries for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579662 Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(du...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #4 from Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 05:40:39 EDT --- Thanks for taking this. It turned out that the current situation of Lookup development is a bit complicated. Actually there are 3 upstream versions: lookup 1.3: the original lookup, currently unmaintained lookup 2.0: beta version of lookup, maintained by the one of the lookup upstream developer lookup 1.4: lookup maintained by edict team, based on 1.3 Interestingly lookup 1.4 and lookup 2.0 are both trying to add new features, as well as bug fixes. From my half year testing with 2.0, it is actually beta quality at the moment (IMO). So I decided to package 1.4. Debian also ships with 1.4. Here are updated spec and SRPM: Spec URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/emacs-lookup/emacs-lookup.spec SRPM URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/emacs-lookup/emacs-lookup-1.4.1-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633194] Review Request: ghc-glade - Haskell binding to libglade2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633194 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 06:00:49 EDT --- Imported and built - thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615700] Review Request: ghc-gtksourceview2 - Haskell gtksourceview2 binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615700 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 06:06:35 EDT --- ghc-gtksourceview2-0.12.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-gtksourceview2-0.12.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633194] Review Request: ghc-glade - Haskell binding to libglade2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633194 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 06:12:02 EDT --- ghc-glade-0.11.1-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-glade-0.11.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639369] Review Request: gfs2-utils - Fileysystem utilities for the GFS2 Filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639369 Steve Whitehouse swhit...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Steve Whitehouse swhit...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 06:09:46 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gfs2-utils New Branches: f13 f14 Owners: swhiteho, bmarzins, rpeterso, fabbione InitialCC: See comment #19 for additional details. RE: comment #22. I've removed Abhi from the list for now. Once the package is created I'll arrange for him to have access to it. Let me know if there are any other issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630778] Review Request: llvm-py - Python bindings for LLVM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630778 Michel Alexandre Salim fed...@michelsylvain.info changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(e...@brouhaha.com ||) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518892] Review Request: gedit-valencia - A gedit plugin providing lightweight Vala IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518892 Michel Alexandre Salim fed...@michelsylvain.info changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(e...@brouhaha.com ||) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595697] Review Request: ghc-regex-tdfa - Haskell tagged DFA regex engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595697 --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 06:21:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) Also, while importing the src rpm to the repo, shall I do it with the updated version? Or should I import the one present for review and later update it? I think you can just import the above srpm and then tweak the description and git add before committing: probably not worth bumping release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647149] Review Request: perl-Test-Fatal - Incredibly simple helpers for testing code with exceptions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647149 --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-10-28 06:51:42 EDT --- Upstream updated to 0.002. New SRPM: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Test-Fatal/perl-Test-Fatal-0.002-1.fc13.src.rpm Spec URL unchanged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639678] Review Request: apache-commons-modeler - rename of jakarta-commons-modeler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639678 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||akurt...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 06:59:05 EDT --- I'll do this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639678] Review Request: apache-commons-modeler - rename of jakarta-commons-modeler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639678
Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-10-28
07:16:22 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
apache-commons-modeler-javadoc.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided
jakarta-commons-modeler-javadoc
No need to keep provides for javadoc.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: ASL 2.0
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package:9ad2dc25be91c38b93346653736856dd
MD5SUM upstream package:9ad2dc25be91c38b93346653736856dd
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x] Package uses %global not %define
[-] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[x] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
=== Maven ===
[-] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-] If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven2.jpp.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[-] Package uses %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[-] Packages have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-utils (for
%update_maven_depmap macro)
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version} with
%{_javadocdir}/%{name} symlink
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar with
%{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (unversioned) symlink
[-] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639678] Review Request: apache-commons-modeler - rename of jakarta-commons-modeler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639678 Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de 2010-10-28 07:21:53 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: apache-commons-modeler Short Description: Model MBeans utility classes Owners: spike Branches: F-14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639684] Review Request: perl-Pegex - Pegex Parser Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639684 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639684] Review Request: perl-Pegex - Pegex Parser Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639684 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 07:39:18 EDT --- perl-Pegex-0.11-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pegex-0.11-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225952] Merge Review: jrefactory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225952 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 08:00:59 EDT --- === Issues === 1. Buildroot Removed. 2. License: I'm not sure about the license tag. The upstream license (http://jrefactory.sourceforge.net/license.txt) looks like ASL 1.1, but where are the BSD and GPL+ parts? There are sources using BSD and GPL licenses. 3. Requires: At least jpackage-utils and java is need according to current java-packaging guidelines Fixed. 4. Bundled jar are still present as backup files in jrefactory/jar/ Fixed. === Final Notes === 1. A short comment on the patches used and the statements in prep would be nice. (why is PMDLookAndFeel.java removed etc). Fixed. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=202307 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225952] Merge Review: jrefactory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225952 --- Comment #4 from Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de 2010-10-28 08:06:52 EDT --- Ok, looks good. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225952] Merge Review: jrefactory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225952 Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225952] Merge Review: jrefactory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225952 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-10-28 08:10:41 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 08:10:41 EDT --- Package is approved. Closing the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644259] Review Request: virt-what - detect if we are running in a virtual machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644259 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 08:25:33 EDT --- virt-what-1.3-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/virt-what-1.3-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644259] Review Request: virt-what - detect if we are running in a virtual machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644259 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 08:25:33 EDT --- virt-what-1.3-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/virt-what-1.3-3.fc14 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 08:25:33 EDT --- virt-what-1.3-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/virt-what-1.3-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644259] Review Request: virt-what - detect if we are running in a virtual machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644259 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-10-28 08:24:20 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 08:24:20 EDT --- Thanks everyone. Initial CC looks fine. Here are the builds: F15 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2561337 F14 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2561344 F13 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2561343 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226168] Merge Review: mx4j
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226168 Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chris.sp...@arcor.de, ||dwall...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de 2010-10-28 08:37:07 EDT --- I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225943] Merge Review: jdom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225943 Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||akurt...@redhat.com, ||chris.sp...@arcor.de, ||overh...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de 2010-10-28 08:45:53 EDT --- I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226168] Merge Review: mx4j
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226168 Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644711] Review Request: diaser - disk based backup volume accumulator, replication and management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644711 --- Comment #2 from Damian d...@interlinux.co.uk 2010-10-28 08:52:49 EDT --- Thank you Martin for your comment. I have resolved all the issues above. The output from rpmlint on diaser.spec and srpm: rpmlint diaser.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint diaser-1.0.8-1.fc13.src.rpm diaser.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. New SRPM URL: SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/diaser/diaser/1.0.8-beta2/diaser-1.0.8-1.fc13.src.rpm rpm -ql diaser /usr/sbin/diaser /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/diaser-1.0.8 /usr/share/doc/diaser-1.0.8/COPYING /usr/share/doc/diaser-1.0.8/CREDITS /usr/share/doc/diaser-1.0.8/README /usr/share/doc/diaser-1.0.8/WARNING /usr/share/doc/diaser-1.0.8/manual.html /usr/share/doc/diaser-1.0.8/manual.txt /usr/share/man/man1/diaser.1.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639684] Review Request: perl-Pegex - Pegex Parser Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639684 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 09:06:14 EDT --- perl-Pegex-0.11-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pegex-0.11-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 515752] Review Request: python-soaplib - python library for creating SOAP services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515752 Jordan OMara jom...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #31 from Jordan OMara jom...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 09:13:27 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-soaplib Short Description: A simple, easily extendible soap library that provides several useful tools for creating, publishing and consuming soap web services in python. Owners: jomara Branches: f12 f13 f14 el6 InitialCC: jomara -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225943] Merge Review: jdom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225943
--- Comment #2 from Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de 2010-10-28 09:22:51 EDT
---
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
jdom.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
jdom.src: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java
jdom.src:179: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package)
%attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
jdom.src:62: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 37, tab: line 62)
jdom.spec:44: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java
jdom.spec:77: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation
jdom.spec:88: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java
jdom.spec:179: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package)
%attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
jdom.spec:62: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 37, tab: line 62)
jdom-demo.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java
jdom-demo.noarch: W: no-documentation
jdom-javadoc.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation
jdom-javadoc.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm
jdom-javadoc.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun rm
jdom.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java
jdom.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.1-1 ['0:1.1.1-1.fc15',
'0:1.1.1-1']
jdom.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/jdom
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 16 warnings.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[!] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[-] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package: 0ad116194e3101fb08fab8f6f00cc58f
MD5SUM upstream package: 0ad116194e3101fb08fab8f6f00cc58f
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[!] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[!] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[!] Package uses %global not %define
[-] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-] If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven2.jpp.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package uses %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[!] Packages have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-utils (for
%update_maven_depmap macro)
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version} with
%{_javadocdir}/%{name} symlink
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar with
%{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (unversioned) symlink
[!] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: fedora-rawhide-i386
=== Issues ===
0.
[Bug 605719] Review Request: mesa-demos - mesa opengl demos
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605719 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-10-28 09:32:52 --- Comment #11 from Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com 2010-10-28 09:32:52 EDT --- Built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644711] Review Request: diaser - disk based backup volume accumulator, replication and management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644711
--- Comment #3 from Damian d...@interlinux.co.uk 2010-10-28 09:37:00 EDT ---
I have now removed the line %{_docdir} from %files section so rpm -ql diaser
gives:
/usr/sbin/diaser
/usr/share/doc/diaser-1.0.8
/usr/share/doc/diaser-1.0.8/COPYING
/usr/share/doc/diaser-1.0.8/CREDITS
/usr/share/doc/diaser-1.0.8/README
/usr/share/doc/diaser-1.0.8/WARNING
/usr/share/doc/diaser-1.0.8/manual.html
/usr/share/doc/diaser-1.0.8/manual.txt
/usr/share/man/man1/diaser.1.gz
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226168] Merge Review: mx4j
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226168 --- Comment #2 from Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de 2010-10-28 09:43:42 EDT --- Please update to 3.0.2 before I start the merge review: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mx4j/files/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226168] Merge Review: mx4j
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226168 Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|chris.sp...@arcor.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #109 from Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmx.de 2010-10-28 09:48:57 EDT --- Doesn't build on F-12 nevertheless, because of a cmake incompatibility: -- Configuring awesome.doxygen CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:284 (file): file does not recognize sub-command COPY [...] -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! Seems it needs a small patch to use install(FILES...) instead of file(COPY...) for cmake 2.6.x. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225943] Merge Review: jdom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225943 Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|chris.sp...@arcor.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616779] Review Request: rubygem-json_pure - JSON implementation in pure Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616779 --- Comment #30 from Michael Stahnke mastah...@gmail.com 2010-10-28 10:51:15 EDT --- Michal, do you have desire to maintain this package for epel? If not, I'd be happy to do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647510] New: Review Request: premake - A cross-platform build configuration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: premake - A cross-platform build configuration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647510 Summary: Review Request: premake - A cross-platform build configuration tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jdegr...@web.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.jaydg.nl/premake.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.jaydg.nl/premake-4.2.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Premake is a build configuration tool that can generate project files for: - GNU make - Code::Blocks - CodeLite - MonoDevelop - SharpDevelop - Apple XCode - Microsoft Visual Studio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639291] Review Request: erlang-mustache - Mustache template engine for Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639291 Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2010-10-28 11:40:36 EDT --- Looks all good to me now. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639291] Review Request: erlang-mustache - Mustache template engine for Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639291 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-28 12:20:43 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: erlang-mustache Short Description: Mustache template engine for Erlang Owners: peter Branches: f12 f13 f14 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 586473] Review Request: mg - Tiny Emacs-like editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586473 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 12:52:03 EDT --- mg-20090107-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - The one true awk descended from UNIX V7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 12:51:40 EDT --- nawk-20100523-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - The one true awk descended from UNIX V7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nawk-20100523-3.el5 |nawk-20100523-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - The one true awk descended from UNIX V7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nawk-20100523-3.fc14|nawk-20100523-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635875] Review Request: mawk - An interpreter for the AWK programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635875 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|mawk-1.3.4-5.20100625.fc14 |mawk-1.3.4-5.20100625.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635875] Review Request: mawk - An interpreter for the AWK programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635875 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|mawk-1.3.4-5.20100625.el5 |mawk-1.3.4-5.20100625.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 586473] Review Request: mg - Tiny Emacs-like editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586473 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 12:51:04 EDT --- mg-20090107-5.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - The one true awk descended from UNIX V7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 12:51:27 EDT --- nawk-20100523-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
