[Bug 630509] Review Request: ghc-split - Combinator library for splitting lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630509 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Alias||ghc-split -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630204] Review Request: ghc-mtlparse - Haskell mtlparse library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630204 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647586] Review Request: nzbget - Command-line based binary newsgrabber for nzb files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647586 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 03:28:56 EDT --- I'll review it too (and will sponsor you). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647063] Review Request: atool - Perl script to handle various archive formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647063 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 03:29:41 EDT --- I'll review it too (and will sponsor you). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647063] Review Request: atool - Perl script to handle various archive formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647063 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 03:35:44 EDT --- Unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR - I just sponsored pcarrier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647586] Review Request: nzbget - Command-line based binary newsgrabber for nzb files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647586 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 03:36:11 EDT --- Unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR - I just sponsored pcarrier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518441] Review Request: ike - Shrew Soft VPN Client For Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518441 Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(and...@topdog.za. | |net)| --- Comment #10 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2010-10-30 03:39:03 EDT --- I wasn't technically non responsive, no one picked up this review so there was no point in continuing to work on it, as am on vacation from fedora work if Jochen wants to continue working on this and someone is willing to review then so be it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647926] Review Request: xsettingsd - Provides settings to X11 clients via the XSETTINGS specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647926
--- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 04:13:22 EDT
---
The package is simple and in a very good shape - I found only two issues:
a) Versioning scheme is wrong. According to Fedora guidelines the proper scheme
should be:
Version:0
Release:0.1.20091208git%{commit_id}%{?dist}
Note that I'm using %{commit_id}, so it should be defined somewhere above this
line.
Also you should fix %changelog entry version accordingly, e.g.
* Fri Oct 29 2010 Pierre Carrier p...@redhat.com - 0-0.1.20091208git7804894
Note that you can't use macros with mutable values in %changelog (%{version},
%{release} or %{commit_id}) or all your change-log entries' records will be
recalculated each build.
b) You accidentally installed elf-binary instead of man-page at line 35. Proper
install directive should be
%{__install} -Dm0755 dump_xsettings.1
%{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/dump_xsettings.1
Please fix these issues and I'll continue.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630270] Review Request: ghc-transformers - Concrete functor and monad transformers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630270 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630264] Review Request: ghc-bytestring-trie - An efficient finite map from (byte)strings to values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630264 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647586] Review Request: nzbget - Command-line based binary newsgrabber for nzb files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647586 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 04:44:10 EDT --- Notes: a) You're installing config-file as a doc-file, but would it be better to install in into /etc/ ? User will get ready-to-go application right after installing then. However looking at the config-file I found that it has too many options which should be adjusted for that (directory paths, server's addresses an so on). Also I have no clue about typical workflow involving nzbget, so feel free to disregard this advice entirely if it would require too much manpower and offer only negligible income. b) You should add AUTHORS files (it a generally good idea to mention people who work hard on providing all that stuff for us) and you *MUST* add COPYING to %doc c) You decided not to install init-script (nzbgetd) - is it intentional? Maybe it's better to package it too. However (as I sated earlier) I have no clue how to use thos application. so I don't have strong opinion here. Please, comment these notes, and I'll continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647063] Review Request: atool - Perl script to handle various archive formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647063 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 05:00:38 EDT --- I see the only issue - you didn't add COPYING as %doc (this is a MUST ifupstream provides licensing terms in its own file). So, please, mark COPYING as %doc and I'll continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635379] Review Request: perl-POSIX-strptime - Perl extension to the POSIX date parsing strptime(3) function
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635379 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2010-10-30 05:22:11 EDT --- Rpmlint output : 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Package builds and installs on F13. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2010-10-30 07:19:27 EDT --- Update follow to upstream: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora13/httpd-itk/httpd-itk-2.2.17-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648007] Review Request: ghc-binary-shared - Haskell library for sharing binary elements
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648007 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-haskell-l...@redhat. ||com Platform|Unspecified |All Alias||ghc-binary-shared -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648007] New: Review Request: ghc-binary-shared - Haskell library for sharing binary elements
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-binary-shared - Haskell library for sharing binary elements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648007 Summary: Review Request: ghc-binary-shared - Haskell library for sharing binary elements Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec file URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-binary-shared.spec?attredirects=0d=1 SRPM URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-binary-shared-0.8.1-1.fc14.src.rpm?attredirects=0d=1 rpmlint output: rpmlint -i ghc-binary-shared-*.rpm ghc-binary-shared.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-binary-shared.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-binary-shared-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-binary-shared-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-binary-shared-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-binary-shared-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-binary-shared-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/binary-shared-0.8.1/libHSbinary-shared-0.8.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647076] Review Request: jackbeat - audio sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647076 --- Comment #9 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2010-10-30 08:26:07 EDT --- Also, please don't forget to bump the release and add a changelog entry every time you make changes to the spec file, including during review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647076] Review Request: jackbeat - audio sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647076
Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xav...@bachelot.org
--- Comment #8 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2010-10-30 08:23:50
EDT ---
Few comments :
- The icon png could be installed with one line rather than 2 :
Replace
%{__install} -m 755 -d %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/pixmaps
%{__install} -m 644 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/pixmaps/
with
%{__install} -Dp -m 644 %{SOURCE1}
%{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png
- if you remove all of %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/%{name}/help no need to remove
%{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/%{name}/help/COPYING first. Also, just a wild guess,
make sure removing this file doesn't break an About box or something like that
in the software.
- The %files section could be much simpler and thus more readable. You want to
own everything in %{_datadir}/%{name} so just use that and remove all others
line starting with %{_datadir}/%{name}. %dir needs to be used only when you
want to own a directory but not what's inside it. Here's how the %files section
should look like :
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING README NEWS
%{_bindir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop
%{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648007] Review Request: ghc-binary-shared - Haskell library for sharing binary elements
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648007 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648023] New: Review Request: erlang-js - A Friendly Erlang to Javascript Binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: erlang-js - A Friendly Erlang to Javascript Binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648023 Summary: Review Request: erlang-js - A Friendly Erlang to Javascript Binding Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemen...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-js.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-js-0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: A Friendly Erlang to Javascript Binding. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2565145 rpmlint: sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/erlang-js-* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: This is one of the requirements for Riak. Unfortunately this library requires UTF-8 support in js, which is enabled only in F-14+, so no luck for EPEL and F-12/F-13 users so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632970] Review Request: rec-applet - An audio recording applet for the GNOME-desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632970 --- Comment #9 from Cédric OLIVIER cedric.oliv...@free.fr 2010-10-30 11:02:37 EDT --- Thanks. So you can find here an updated package with the last release and modifications according your last comment. Spec file : http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/rec-applet-0.2.3-2/rec-applet.spec SRPM file: http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/rec-applet-0.2.3-2/rec-applet-0.2.3-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546738] Review Request: accerciser - An interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546738 --- Comment #4 from Ben Konrath b...@bagu.org 2010-10-30 11:10:39 EDT --- I no longer have time to maintain the accerciser package. Does somebody want to take over the package review? I would like to remove the spec file and sprm from my server. Is there a place I can put these files to in case somebody wants to take over this review sometime in the future? Thanks, Ben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638590] Review Request: freemind - a mind-mapping software written in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638590 --- Comment #2 from hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com 2010-10-30 12:24:02 EDT --- Ok just finished some work: Spec URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/freemind/freemind.spec SRPM URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/freemind/freemind-0.9.0-4.rc10.fc14.src.rpm I removed the latex plugin and the dependency on HotEqn. Also I finally made the svg export plugin work. So perhaps someone is willing to do the review. I would really appreciate any hints to improve the package... Kind regards, Johannes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630509] Review Request: ghc-split - Combinator library for splitting lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630509 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 12:44:07 EDT --- Thanks. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-split Short Description: Combinator library for splitting lists Owners: mathstuf Branches: f13 f14 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607584] Review Request: wordgroupz - A vocabulary building application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607584 Ratnadeep Debnath rtn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(rtn...@gmail.com) | --- Comment #27 from Ratnadeep Debnath rtn...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 12:46:58 EDT --- I restored the changelog version numbers to 0.3b-1 and so on. As you suggested, from now on I will maintain the correct version number as you suggested. I didn't add new changelog for this because there were not much major changes involved. SPEC Url : http://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SPECS/wordgroupz.spec SRPM url: http://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SRPMS/wordgroupz-0.3-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634091] Review Request: postgresql-plparrot - A PostgreSQL procedural language for the Parrot virtual machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634091 Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de 2010-10-30 13:02:54 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: postgresql-plparrot Short Description: A PostgreSQL procedural language for the Parrot virtual machine Owners: gerd Branches: f13 f14 el6 InitialCC: gerd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630208] Review Request: ghc-csv - CSV loader and dumper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630208 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-30 13:08:52 EDT --- ghc-csv-0.1.1-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-csv-0.1.1-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630208] Review Request: ghc-csv - CSV loader and dumper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630208 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630208] Review Request: ghc-csv - CSV loader and dumper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630208 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(maths...@gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #8 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 13:08:48 EDT --- Yes, thanks. Filed an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630222] Review Request: ghc-colour - A model for human colour/color perception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630222 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-30 13:28:58 EDT --- ghc-colour-2.3.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-colour-2.3.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630222] Review Request: ghc-colour - A model for human colour/color perception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630222 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-30 13:29:05 EDT --- ghc-colour-2.3.1-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-colour-2.3.1-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630222] Review Request: ghc-colour - A model for human colour/color perception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630222 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639945] Review Request: libreoffice - Community developed Free Software Office Suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639945 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 13:31:52 EDT --- I wish you guys made an official announcement for this switch. Or maybe you did and we missed it. My question is, why don't you put one or both of Obsoletes: openoffice.org-subpackage, Provides: openoffice.org-subpackage to the libreoffice subpackages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647063] Review Request: atool - Perl script to handle various archive formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647063 --- Comment #5 from Pierre Carrier pcarr...@redhat.com 2010-10-30 13:44:06 EDT --- Updated. No release bump as this wasn't distributed yet. Thanks Peter! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647586] Review Request: nzbget - Command-line based binary newsgrabber for nzb files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647586 --- Comment #5 from Pierre Carrier pcarr...@redhat.com 2010-10-30 13:50:50 EDT --- a) It is an example configuration file. I would consider most sysadmins would not have a system-wide config file and let users have their own in ~/.nzbget b) Done for AUTHORS and COPYING, I feel sorry I missed those... Also added a reminder comment for NEWS (currently empty). c) As for a), I wouldn't expect system-wide use. If I get opposite feedback, I'll be happy to add a system-wide initscript and configuration file. Updated, no release bump as this package was not distributed yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630272] Review Request: ghc-tagsoup - Parsing HTML/XML documents library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630272 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595697] Review Request: ghc-regex-tdfa - Haskell tagged DFA regex engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595697 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-30 13:55:47 EDT --- ghc-tagsoup-0.11.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-tagsoup-0.11.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595697] Review Request: ghc-regex-tdfa - Haskell tagged DFA regex engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595697 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595697] Review Request: ghc-regex-tdfa - Haskell tagged DFA regex engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595697 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-30 13:55:53 EDT --- ghc-tagsoup-0.11.1-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-tagsoup-0.11.1-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630272] Review Request: ghc-tagsoup - Parsing HTML/XML documents library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630272 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-30 13:57:47 EDT --- ghc-tagsoup-0.11.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-tagsoup-0.11.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647926] Review Request: xsettingsd - Provides settings to X11 clients via the XSETTINGS specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647926
--- Comment #6 from Pierre Carrier pcarr...@redhat.com 2010-10-30 14:03:13
EDT ---
1) Fixed the ChangeLog, relocated the commit_id definition, changed Version:
and Release:
2) Reused the sed expression with the | separator as , appeared in
%{optflags}
Updated fedorapeople.org, no release bump as the original package was not
distributed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647926] Review Request: xsettingsd - Provides settings to X11 clients via the XSETTINGS specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647926 --- Comment #7 from Pierre Carrier pcarr...@redhat.com 2010-10-30 14:07:13 EDT --- Thanks a lot for the sponsorship Peter. FAS username pcarrier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648053] Review Request: libMicro - Portable micro-benchmarks for various system and library calls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648053 Pierre Carrier pcarr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: main |Review Request: libMicro - |package name here - short |Portable micro-benchmarks |summary here |for various system and ||library calls -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647063] Review Request: atool - Perl script to handle various archive formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647063
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 14:33:05 EDT
---
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ rpmlint is not silent. However almost all its messages can be safely ignored
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/atool-0.37.0-1.fc12.noarch.rpm
atool.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) perl - Perl, peel, perk
atool.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gzip - zip, grip, g zip
atool.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bzip - zip, blip, b zip
atool.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lzop - lop, loop, Lopez
atool.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lzma - lama, Lima,
Lamaze
atool.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pkzip - pk zip, pk-zip,
pipkin
atool.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rar - arr, ear, tar
atool.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US arj - raj, ark, ar
atool.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpio - CPI, Scipio,
campion
atool.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US alzip - al zip, al-zip,
aliped
atool.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/atool-0.37.0/NEWS
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
Please, convert NEWS from iso-8859-1 to UTF-8.
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (GPLv2
or later).
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum atool-0.37.0.tar.gz*
5fa8b6481c67dcdb44956b061c30f0904aa420708a9f3ddc7c20fc4e0e4c215f
atool-0.37.0.tar.gz
5fa8b6481c67dcdb44956b061c30f0904aa420708a9f3ddc7c20fc4e0e4c215f
atool-0.37.0.tar.gz.1
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES:
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
0 No shared library files.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
+ The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
0 No header files.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1).
0 No devel sub-package.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
Please, note that due to missing %clean section your package won't conform the
guidelines on some old Fedora releases and EPEL 4 and 5 (not sure about 6).
Also don't forget to convert NEWS to UTF-8.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630266] Review Request: ghc-JSONb - JSON parser that uses byte strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630266 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||630227 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630267] Review Request: ghc-data-object-json - Serialize JSON data using the data-object library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630267 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|630227 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630227] Review Request: ghc-convertible-text - Typeclasses and instances for converting between types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630227 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|630267 |630266 Bug 630227 depends on bug 619991, which changed state. Bug 619991 Summary: Review Request: ghc-text - Haskell efficient packed Unicode text type https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619991 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647926] Review Request: xsettingsd - Provides settings to X11 clients via the XSETTINGS specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647926 --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 15:02:53 EDT --- Oops, wrong link: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2565734 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630273] Review Request: ghc-authenticate - Authentication methods for Haskell web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630273 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|630271 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647063] Review Request: atool - Perl script to handle various archive formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647063 --- Comment #7 from Pierre Carrier pcarr...@redhat.com 2010-10-30 15:06:27 EDT --- Correction made using iconv. I do not target Fedora 12-, nor EPEL5-. However if policies on EPEL6 do not match F13+ I'll probably adapt the relevant SPECs. Thank you for the approval :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630271] Review Request: ghc-http-wget - A simple HTTP client that wraps the wget tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630271 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|630273(ghc-authenticate)| --- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 15:03:01 EDT --- The authenticate package no longer depends on http-wget. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647586] Review Request: nzbget - Command-line based binary newsgrabber for nzb files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647586 --- Comment #7 from Pierre Carrier pcarr...@redhat.com 2010-10-30 15:08:22 EDT --- Thank you for the approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647926] Review Request: xsettingsd - Provides settings to X11 clients via the XSETTINGS specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647926 --- Comment #10 from Pierre Carrier pcarr...@redhat.com 2010-10-30 15:09:19 EDT --- Changed perms from 755 to 644 on the manpages, as discussed on XMPP. Packages updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647926] Review Request: xsettingsd - Provides settings to X11 clients via the XSETTINGS specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647926 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647586] Review Request: nzbget - Command-line based binary newsgrabber for nzb files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647586 --- Comment #8 from Pierre Carrier pcarr...@redhat.com 2010-10-30 15:16:12 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nzbget Short Description: Command-line based binary newsgrabber for nzb files Owners: pcarrier Branches: f14 el6 InitialCC: pcarrier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647926] Review Request: xsettingsd - Provides settings to X11 clients via the XSETTINGS specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647926
--- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 15:13:11
EDT ---
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ rpmlint is NOT silent
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ~/Desktop/xsettingsd-*
xsettingsd.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/man/man1/xsettingsd.1.gz
xsettingsd.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/man/man1/dump_xsettings.1.gz
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
These messages were fixed already (just re-download spec-file).
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (BSD).
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum derat-xsettingsd-7804894.tar.gz*
fd7a6e6a8cc9c45ef230aba25b5167da2a4b61e229af34f68045eac0036cea84
derat-xsettingsd-7804894.tar.gz
fd7a6e6a8cc9c45ef230aba25b5167da2a4b61e229af34f68045eac0036cea84
derat-xsettingsd-7804894.tar.gz.1
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES:
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
0 No shared library files in some of the dynamic linker's default paths.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
0 The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
0 No header files.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1).
0 No devel sub-package.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647586] Review Request: nzbget - Command-line based binary newsgrabber for nzb files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647586 Pierre Carrier pcarr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647063] Review Request: atool - Perl script to handle various archive formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647063 Pierre Carrier pcarr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Pierre Carrier pcarr...@redhat.com 2010-10-30 15:20:00 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: atool Short Description: Perl script to handle various archive formats Owners: pcarrier Branches: f14 el6 InitialCC: pcarrier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647926] Review Request: xsettingsd - Provides settings to X11 clients via the XSETTINGS specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647926 Pierre Carrier pcarr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Pierre Carrier pcarr...@redhat.com 2010-10-30 15:22:50 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: xsettingsd Short Description: Provides settings to X11 clients via the XSETTINGS specification Owners: pcarrier Branches: f14 el6 InitialCC: pcarrier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562585] Review Request: ccd2iso - CloneCD image to ISO image file converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562585
--- Comment #27 from Mohammed Safwat mohammed_elaf...@yahoo.com 2010-10-30
15:22:10 EDT ---
Today I've imported the package into the rawhide and f14 branch. I've however
run into some annoyance with the f14 branch. I got confused as I was reading
two different approaches to import the package into different branches, one at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Check_out_the_module by
checking out a different directory for each branch, and the other at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT#Merging by checking out a single
combined tree for all the branches. This led me to request a build for the
package on the f14 branch at an early commit
66ab586444c33ac05f3d5863957aeaa88a53cfb0 and it passed successfully as seen at
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2564860. However later I
had a more recent commit 06534148c82c4015f2dc13362770b74bb4bd1a67 as seen at
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=ccd2iso.git;a=commit;h=06534148c82c4015f2dc13362770b74bb4bd1a67
and
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=ccd2iso.git;a=shortlog;h=f14/master.
However since the build task invoked earlier for the older commit succeeded, it
seems I can't request another build for that newer commit. When I invoke
`fedpkg build', I get the error
Could not initiate build: ccd2iso-0.3-6.fc14 has already been built
I even tried to request a koji build explicitly for this command by running
`koji build dist-f14-updates-candidate
git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/ccd2iso?#06534148c82c4015f2dc13362770b74bb4bd1a67',
the created task fails with
GenericError: Build already exists (id=202527, state=COMPLETE): {'name':
'ccd2iso', 'task_id': 2564885, 'pkg_id': 10805, 'epoch': None,
'completion_time': None, 'state': 0, 'version': '0.3', 'owner': 1325,
'release': '6.fc14', 'id': 202527}
as it can be seen at
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2564885 for example. Now is
there any way to request a build against a specific commit for a branch that
has already passed a successful build? Appreciating any suggestions.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639945] Review Request: libreoffice - Community developed Free Software Office Suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639945 --- Comment #15 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2010-10-30 15:50:27 EDT --- I mentioned it on the list some time ago, http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-October/143728.html All the subpackages do have Obsoletes: openoffice.org-subpackage in them. But can't really do a Provides: because it would mask that the dirs are different, so extensions need to be rebuilt to install in the new libreoffice locations. I think I've now rebuilt everything that requires it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630282] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl - Monad-transformer for Control.Exception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|630283 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630280] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-transformers - Monad-transformer compatiblibility with Control.Exception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630280 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|630283 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630270] Review Request: ghc-transformers - Concrete functor and monad transformers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630270 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||630283 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630283] Review Request: ghc-neither - Either with monad and applicative instances
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630283 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|630280, 630282 |630270 --- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 15:58:29 EDT --- Update bug dependencies for new version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630283] Review Request: ghc-neither - Either with monad and applicative instances
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630283 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|630292 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630223] Review Request: ghc-failure - A simple type class for success/failure computations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630223 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||630292 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630283] Review Request: ghc-neither - Either with monad and applicative instances
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630283 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||630297 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630297] Review Request: ghc-persistent - Type-safe, non-relational, multi-backend persistence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630297 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||630283 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562585] Review Request: ccd2iso - CloneCD image to ISO image file converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562585 --- Comment #28 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 16:03:21 EDT --- It looks like the F-15 and F-14 packages are built fine. If the packages are usable (e.g. generated from the same SPEC file) then you don't need to do anything in koji for F-14 and F-15. Next I see that you messed things up a little with merging, and f14/master is ahead of master. You can leave this as is now, or merge master with f14/master. Later on, when you update to a newer version, or when you fix a bug, I recommend merging everything to master. For now, if you want to build F-12 and F-13 packages, just switch to their branch and merge with master. Then proceed as usual. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639945] Review Request: libreoffice - Community developed Free Software Office Suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639945 --- Comment #16 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 16:09:06 EDT --- Understood. Thanks for the clarification. By the way, how do we pronounce libreoffice? Is libre a real word? I can't find it in my dictionary. I wish they came up with a less terrible name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630302] Review Request: ghc-pureMD5 - MD5 implementations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630302 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|630275 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630275] Review Request: ghc-cereal - A binary serialization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630275 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|630302 | --- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 16:13:02 EDT --- cereal is no longer a direct dependency of pureMD5 (crypto-api will be up later). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645764] Review Request: django-addons - to add plugging functionality in your projects easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645764 --- Comment #5 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 16:35:16 EDT --- Much better :) As is, it won't build in mock, you need to add Django to BuildRequires. Then it will build at least in F14 and EPEL6, but not on EPEL5, where python-setuptools-devel does not exist; if you're not going to ask for a EL5 branch you may ignore the issue. the LICENSE file needs to be added to %doc, along with README or PKG-INFO (the least two seem to have basically the same content) rpmlint is not clean; some items will go away but I think: django-addons.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr django_addons needs to be addressed. Is there a reason why that directory is not in /usr/share ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645764] Review Request: django-addons - to add plugging functionality in your projects easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645764 --- Comment #6 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 16:40:36 EDT --- Ah, forgot a couple more points. URL should be simple the reference to the project website, like this: URL:http://pypi.python.org/pypi/django-addons It's a SHOULD item but please add a comment in the spec about the added patch; if you reported it upstream, a link to an open issue or even a mailing list message is just enough, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630300] Review Request: ghc-wai-extra - Provides some basic WAI handlers and middleware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630300 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|630298 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630298] Review Request: ghc-sendfile - A portable sendfile library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630298 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|630300 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645761] Review Request: django-threadedcomments - a simple yet flexible threaded commenting system for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645761 Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gia...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 17:01:03 EDT --- Most of my comments in bug 645764 also apply here: * Full URL is needed on Source * License should be BSD * License Text should be included in the package * Summary should be shortened (A simple yet... is enough) * There are couple more files for the %doc section (Changelog.txt and contributors.txt) * Version advised in changlog does not match package * Did not check a mock build, but chances are Django is needed as BR: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630277] Review Request: ghc-control-monad-attempt - Monad transformer for attempt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630277 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|630303(yesod) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630277] Review Request: ghc-control-monad-attempt - Monad transformer for attempt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630277 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630273] Review Request: ghc-authenticate - Authentication methods for Haskell web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630273 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|630303(yesod) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630273] Review Request: ghc-authenticate - Authentication methods for Haskell web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630273 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630298] Review Request: ghc-sendfile - A portable sendfile library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630298 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630303] Review Request: yesod - Creation of type-safe, RESTful web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630303 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|630273(ghc-authenticate), |630274 |630277 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630280] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-transformers - Monad-transformer compatiblibility with Control.Exception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630280 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630271] Review Request: ghc-http-wget - A simple HTTP client that wraps the wget tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630271 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630282] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl - Monad-transformer for Control.Exception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630274] Review Request: ghc-blaze-builder - Builder to efficiently append text
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630274 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||630303(yesod) Bug 630274 depends on bug 619991, which changed state. Bug 619991 Summary: Review Request: ghc-text - Haskell efficient packed Unicode text type https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619991 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630227] Review Request: ghc-convertible-text - Typeclasses and instances for converting between types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630227 --- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 17:33:49 EDT --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-convertible-text/ghc-convertible-text.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-convertible-text/ghc-convertible-text-0.3.0.6-1.fc14.src.rpm % lintmock fedora-14-x86_64-bb ghc-convertible-text.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Typeclasses - Type classes, Type-classes, Superclasses ghc-convertible-text.src: W: strange-permission ghc-convertible-text.spec 0640L ghc-convertible-text.src: W: strange-permission convertible-text-0.3.0.6.tar.gz 0640L ghc-convertible-text.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Typeclasses - Type classes, Type-classes, Superclasses ghc-convertible-text-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Typeclasses - Type classes, Type-classes, Superclasses ghc-convertible-text-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-convertible-text-devel ghc-convertible-text-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-convertible-text-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/convertible-text-0.3.0.6/lib HSconvertible-text-0.3.0.6_p.a 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630270] Review Request: ghc-transformers - Concrete functor and monad transformers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630270 --- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 17:36:40 EDT --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-transformers/ghc-transformers.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-transformers/ghc-transformers-0.2.2.0-1.fc14.src.rpm % lintmock fedora-14-x86_64-bb ghc-transformers.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) functor - function, perfunctory, perfunctorily ghc-transformers.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US liftings - lifting, listings, siftings ghc-transformers.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fd - FD, dd, ff ghc-transformers.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tf - ft, t, f ghc-transformers.src: W: strange-permission ghc-transformers.spec 0640L ghc-transformers.src: W: strange-permission transformers-0.2.2.0.tar.gz 0640L ghc-transformers.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) functor - function, perfunctory, perfunctorily ghc-transformers.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US liftings - lifting, listings, siftings ghc-transformers.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fd - FD, dd, ff ghc-transformers.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tf - ft, t, f ghc-transformers-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) functor - function, perfunctory, perfunctorily ghc-transformers-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US liftings - lifting, listings, siftings ghc-transformers-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fd - FD, dd, ff ghc-transformers-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tf - ft, t, f ghc-transformers-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-transformers-devel ghc-transformers-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) functor - function, perfunctory, perfunctorily ghc-transformers-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US liftings - lifting, listings, siftings ghc-transformers-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fd - FD, dd, ff ghc-transformers-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tf - ft, t, f ghc-transformers-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-transformers-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/transformers-0.2.2.0/libHStransformers-0.2.2.0_p.a 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 20 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630288] Review Request: ghc-enumerator - Implementation of Oleg Kiselyov's left-fold enumerators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630288 Bug 630288 depends on bug 619991, which changed state. Bug 619991 Summary: Review Request: ghc-text - Haskell efficient packed Unicode text type https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619991 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2010-10-30 17:39:40 EDT --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-enumerator/ghc-enumerator.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-enumerator/ghc-enumerator-0.4.2-1.fc14.src.rpm % lintmock fedora-14-x86_64-bb ghc-enumerator.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP ghc-enumerator.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US okmij - okapi, Okie, Okinawa ghc-enumerator.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs - HS, sh, gs ghc-enumerator.src: W: strange-permission ghc-enumerator.spec 0640L ghc-enumerator.src: W: strange-permission enumerator-0.4.2.tar.gz 0640L ghc-enumerator.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP ghc-enumerator.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US okmij - okapi, Okie, Okinawa ghc-enumerator.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs - HS, sh, gs ghc-enumerator-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP ghc-enumerator-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US okmij - okapi, Okie, Okinawa ghc-enumerator-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs - HS, sh, gs ghc-enumerator-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-enumerator-devel ghc-enumerator-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP ghc-enumerator-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US okmij - okapi, Okie, Okinawa ghc-enumerator-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs - HS, sh, gs ghc-enumerator-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-enumerator-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/enumerator-0.4.2/libHSenumerator-0.4.2_p.a 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 16 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648093] Review Request: ghc-attoparsec-enumerator - Convert an Attoparsec parser into an iteratee
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648093 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-haskell-l...@redhat. ||com Depends on||630260, 630288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630260] Review Request: ghc-attoparsec- Fast combinator parsing for bytestrings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630260 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||648093 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648095] New: Review Request: ghc-HsOpenSSL - (Incomplete) OpenSSL binding for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HsOpenSSL - (Incomplete) OpenSSL binding for Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648095 Summary: Review Request: ghc-HsOpenSSL - (Incomplete) OpenSSL binding for Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maths...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-HsOpenSSL/ghc-HsOpenSSL.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-HsOpenSSL/ghc-HsOpenSSL-0.8.0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: HsOpenSSL is an (incomplete) OpenSSL binding for Haskell. It can generate RSA and DSA keys, read and write PEM files, generate message digests, sign and verify messages, encrypt and decrypt messages. % lintmock fedora-14-x86_64-bb ghc-HsOpenSSL.src: W: invalid-license PublicDomain ghc-HsOpenSSL.src: W: strange-permission HsOpenSSL-0.8.0.2.tar.gz 0640L ghc-HsOpenSSL.src: W: strange-permission ghc-HsOpenSSL.spec 0640L ghc-HsOpenSSL.x86_64: W: invalid-license PublicDomain ghc-HsOpenSSL-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license PublicDomain ghc-HsOpenSSL-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-HsOpenSSL-devel ghc-HsOpenSSL-prof.x86_64: W: invalid-license PublicDomain ghc-HsOpenSSL-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-HsOpenSSL-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/HsOpenSSL-0.8.0.2/libHSHsOpenSSL-0.8.0.2_p.a 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 8 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648097] New: Review Request: ghc-network-bytestring - Fast, memory-efficient, low-level networking
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-network-bytestring - Fast, memory-efficient, low-level networking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648097 Summary: Review Request: ghc-network-bytestring - Fast, memory-efficient, low-level networking Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maths...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-network-bytestring/ghc-network-bytestring.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-network-bytestring/ghc-network-bytestring-0.8.0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Fast, memory-efficient, low-level socket functions that use 'Data.ByteString's instead of 'String's. % lintmock fedora-14-x86_64-bb ghc-network-bytestring.src: W: strange-permission network-bytestring-0.1.3.2.tar.gz 0640L ghc-network-bytestring.src: W: strange-permission ghc-network-bytestring.spec 0640L ghc-network-bytestring-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-network-bytestring-devel ghc-network-bytestring-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-network-bytestring-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/network-bytestring-0.1.3.2/libHSnetwork-bytestring-0.1.3.2_p.a 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591388] Review Request: pbuilder - Personal package builder for Debian packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591388
--- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-30
17:59:19 EDT ---
REVIEW FOR pbuilder-0.196-1.fc13.src.rpm
FIX - MUST:
pbuilder.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US chroot - cheroot, ch
root, ch-root
pbuilder.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US debootstrap - de
bootstrap, de-bootstrap, bootstrapped
pbuilder.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dsc - dc, sc, desc
pbuilder.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C pbuilder update updates the
image to the current state of testing/unstable/whatever
pbuilder.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/B92test-pkg
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/pbuildd/hookdir/A10dpkg-l.sh
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/pbuilder-test/002_libfile
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/rebuild/buildall
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/D90chrootmemo
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/F90chrootmemo
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/execute_paramtest.sh
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/pbuilder-test/003_makecheck
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/pbuilder-test/000_prepinstall
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/pbuildd/buildd.sh
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/B90list-missing
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/D80no-man-db-rebuild
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/D10tmp
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/D20addnonfree
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/pbuilder-test/004_ldd
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/workaround/E50-initscripts-2.86.ds1-7.workaround.sh
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/execute_installtest.sh
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/workaround/G50-initscripts-2.86.ds1-11-cdebootstrap0.3.9.sh
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/C10shell
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/B90lintian
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/pbuilder-distribution.sh
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/pbuilder-test/001_apprun
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/lvmpbuilder/lvmbuilder
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/rebuild/getlist
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/B91debc
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/B91dpkg-i
pbuilder.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder-0.196/examples/C11screen
pbuilder.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary debuild-pbuilder
pbuilder.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pdebuild-user-mode-linux
pbuilder.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pdebuild
pbuilder.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pbuilder-user-mode-linux
pbuilder.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pbuilder
pbuilder.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US chroot - cheroot, ch
root, ch-root
pbuilder.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US debootstrap - de
bootstrap, de-bootstrap, bootstrapped
pbuilder.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dsc - dc, sc, desc
pbuilder.src: E: description-line-too-long C pbuilder update updates the
image to the current state of testing/unstable/whatever
pbuilder.src:70: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/%{name}
pbuilder.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/pbuilder/pbuilder_0.196.tar.gz HTTP
Error 404: Not Found
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 40 warnings.
Can be ignored: spelling-error, no-manual-page-for-binary,
only-non-binary-in-usr-lib, hardcoded-library-path
Need to be fixed: description-line-too-long, spurious-executable-perm
OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name}
OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines
OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the
[Bug 648098] New: Review Request: ghc-zlib-bindings - Low-level bindings to the zlib package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-zlib-bindings - Low-level bindings to the zlib package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648098 Summary: Review Request: ghc-zlib-bindings - Low-level bindings to the zlib package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maths...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-zlib-bindings/ghc-zlib-bindings.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-zlib-bindings/ghc-zlib-bindings-0.0.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Low-level bindings to the zlib package % lintmock fedora-14-x86_64-bb ghc-zlib-bindings.src: W: strange-permission zlib-bindings-0.0.0.tar.gz 0640L ghc-zlib-bindings.src: W: strange-permission ghc-zlib-bindings.spec 0640L ghc-zlib-bindings-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-zlib-bindings-devel ghc-zlib-bindings-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-zlib-bindings-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/zlib-bindings-0.0.0/libHSzlib-bindings-0.0.0_p.a 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648099] New: Review Request: ghc-http-enumerator - Haskell http-enumerator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-http-enumerator - Haskell http-enumerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648099 Summary: Review Request: ghc-http-enumerator - Haskell http-enumerator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maths...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-http-enumerator/ghc-http-enumerator.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-http-enumerator/ghc-http-enumerator-0.2.0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: This package uses attoparsec for parsing the actual contents of the HTTP connection. The only gotcha is the withHttpEnumerator function, otherwise should do exactly what you expect. % lintmock fedora-14-x86_64-bb ghc-http-enumerator.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-http-enumerator.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US attoparsec - megaparsec, ectoparasite, attorneyship ghc-http-enumerator.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US withHttpEnumerator - enumerator, numerator, enumeration ghc-http-enumerator.src: W: strange-permission ghc-http-enumerator.spec 0640L ghc-http-enumerator.src: W: strange-permission http-enumerator-0.2.0.2.tar.gz 0640L ghc-http-enumerator.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-http-enumerator.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US attoparsec - megaparsec, ectoparasite, attorneyship ghc-http-enumerator.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US withHttpEnumerator - enumerator, numerator, enumeration ghc-http-enumerator-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US attoparsec - megaparsec, ectoparasite, attorneyship ghc-http-enumerator-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US withHttpEnumerator - enumerator, numerator, enumeration ghc-http-enumerator-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-http-enumerator-devel ghc-http-enumerator-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US attoparsec - megaparsec, ectoparasite, attorneyship ghc-http-enumerator-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US withHttpEnumerator - enumerator, numerator, enumeration ghc-http-enumerator-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-http-enumerator-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/http-enumerator-0.2.0.2/libHShttp-enumerator-0.2.0.2_p.a 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 14 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630274] Review Request: ghc-blaze-builder - Builder to efficiently append text
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630274 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||648099 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648098] Review Request: ghc-zlib-bindings - Low-level bindings to the zlib package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648098 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||648099 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
