[Bug 641093] Review Request: keybinder - A library for registering global keyboard shortcuts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641093 hannes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-11-03 02:12:20 --- Comment #12 from hannes 2010-11-03 02:12:20 EDT --- build in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=11135 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2573267 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647076] Review Request: jackbeat - audio sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647076
Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com
--- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2010-11-03
01:05:18 EDT ---
A couple quick points from me too before we do a full review:
* You don't need BuildRequires (BR) to autoconf and zlib-devel
* You need to BR libxml2-devel and libsamplerate-devel
It's always to build your package in mock to test whether you are missing any
BRs.
- You mix up two macro conventions, which is not recommended. For example, if
you are using %{__make}, %{__rm} etc, you want to use %{__sed}. Conversely, if
you use sed, then you want to use make and rm. I prefer the latter convention
but that's just me.
! Please make the %description span 80 columns as much as possible. Currently
it is set to 70 columns max.
! At Fedora, we don't put Author information in %description
! It would be good to explain in the spec file as comments where additional
patches and sources come from and/or what they are for. The .desktop file can
probably be sent upstream. I guess you derived the .png file from
pkgdata/pixmaps/jackbeat_logo.png . Can you do a higher resolution one, so this
looks nicer in the desktop menu?
* It would be good if you make the .desktop file a little nicer. Here are a few
suggestions:
- Add a "Comment:". Remember that Gnome uses "Comment" whereas KDE uses
"GenericName". No need to repeat the application name in the "Comment" or
"GenericName".
- You need to add the category AudioVideo; I think this will be mandatory
soon.
- If you add a X-Jack; category, the application will nicely coexist in our
Jack menu with other Jack applications. (did you install the multimedia-menus
package?)
Thanks for packaging this!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 640337] Review Request: perl-MooseX-NonMoose - Easy subclassing of non-Moose classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640337 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 640337] Review Request: perl-MooseX-NonMoose - Easy subclassing of non-Moose classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640337 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-03 01:06:19 EDT --- perl-MooseX-NonMoose-0.15-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MooseX-NonMoose-0.15-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630270] Review Request: ghc-transformers - Concrete functor and monad transformers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630270 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-03 00:37:03 EDT --- ghc-transformers-0.2.2.0-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-transformers-0.2.2.0-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630270] Review Request: ghc-transformers - Concrete functor and monad transformers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630270 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630270] Review Request: ghc-transformers - Concrete functor and monad transformers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630270 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-03 00:37:10 EDT --- ghc-transformers-0.2.2.0-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-transformers-0.2.2.0-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647721] Review Request: perl-Reaper - Support for reaping child processes via $SIG{CHLD}
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647721 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-03 00:08:31 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645863] Review Request: python-oauth2 - Python support for improved oauth
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645863 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-03 00:08:06 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648633] Review Request: python-sphinx10 - Python documentation generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648633 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-03 00:10:22 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 640337] Review Request: perl-MooseX-NonMoose - Easy subclassing of non-Moose classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640337 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-03 00:06:17 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648517] Review Request: enum - Seq- and jot-like enumerator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648517 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-03 00:09:28 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639615] Review Request: rubygem-rvm - Ruby Version Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639615 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-03 00:05:24 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). With the release of f14, we no longer allow/offer f12 branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641093] Review Request: keybinder - A library for registering global keyboard shortcuts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641093 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-03 00:07:31 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 484051] Review Request: sockettest - Test My Socket
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484051 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(ita...@ispbrasil. | |com.br) | --- Comment #14 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2010-11-03 00:02:58 EDT --- you can continue reviewing this package or ask PRABIN KUMAR DATTA to open a new review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639369] Review Request: gfs2-utils - Fileysystem utilities for the GFS2 Filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639369 --- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-03 00:04:04 EDT --- Ah, the branches existed in pkgdb, but were not on the git server. I have fixed that. Nothing will be released until you remove the dead.package, import a package and build it (and push it as an update for stable releases). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637868] Rename request: meego-panel-pasteboard - MeeGo Panel for Paste Board
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637868 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-03 00:00:22 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636654] Review Request: Gorm - The GNUstep graphical interface builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636654 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-02 23:58:51 EDT --- WARNING: "foo" is not a valid FAS account. WARNING: Requested package name gorm doesn't match bug summary Gorm Can you resubmit the request? If the package is 'gorm' can you change the bug summary to match? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637511] Review Request: php-phpunit-PHP-CodeCoverage - PHP code coverage information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637511 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-02 23:59:15 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630270] Review Request: ghc-transformers - Concrete functor and monad transformers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630270 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-02 23:57:18 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523599] Review Request: perl-Try-Tiny - Minimal try/catch with proper localization of $@
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523599 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-02 23:55:45 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635379] Review Request: perl-POSIX-strptime - Perl extension to the POSIX date parsing strptime(3) function
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635379 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-02 23:57:55 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561462] Review Request: jaffl - Java Abstracted Foreign Function Layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561462 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-02 23:56:13 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 427483] Review Request: publican-jboss - JBoss Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427483 --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-02 23:55:20 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 612768] Review Request: holland - Pluggable Backup Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612768 --- Comment #6 from BJ Dierkes 2010-11-02 23:52:52 EDT --- Updated, and removed example plugin (per discussion with other upstream devs): SPEC: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/holland.spec SRPM: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/holland-1.0.4-2.fc13.src.rpm RPMLINT (ignore warnings as per above comments): [wdier...@derks-linux buildroot]$ rpmlint -i SPECS/holland.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [wdier...@derks-linux buildroot]$ rpmlint -i /var/lib/mock/fedora-13-x86_64/result/*.rpm holland.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/holland/holland.conf 0640L The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). holland-mysqldump.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/holland/providers/mysqldump.conf 0640L The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). holland-mysqllvm.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/holland/providers/mysql-lvm.conf 0640L The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). holland-random.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/holland/providers/random.conf 0640L The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 427483] Review Request: publican-jboss - JBoss Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427483 Ruediger Landmann changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-11-02 20:55:44 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: publican-jboss Short Description: common files and templates needed to build documentation with the JBoss brand with Publican. Owners: jfearn rlandmann Branches: f13 f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 483025] Review Request: imms - Adaptive playlist framework tracking and adapting to your listening patterns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483025 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(xja...@fi.muni.cz ||) --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 20:35:16 EDT --- It's been the better part of a year since the last comment with no response. I'm thinking that at this point this should just be closed, and I'll do that soon if nothing happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 --- Comment #24 from Chris Bagwell 2010-11-02 20:32:54 EDT --- A newer eee-control was released by author in May so at least it can be made to work with latest UPower DBUS events. But I see less and less need for it. Here is run down of its features (this is latest status from my comment #8): * All hotkeys are sent as standard /dev/input/event* and can be mapped using apps such as Gnome Shortcuts. * Wireless is hooked up to standard rfkill kernel interface and disabling wifi/bluetooth works standard ways. * Sensor status is using standard interfaces and so can use most any gnome applet to monitor. * With latest kernel power savings work (say kernel 2.6.34 or newer) and more recent eee pc's (say anything above 9 inches) I see no power savings via powertop for disabling camera or card reader. eeepc-wmi driver (for Eee PC that ship with Windows 7) doesn't have an interface for these anyways. That leaves useful features of: * Disabling touchpad when plugging in a mouse. Well, it doesn't do this automatically. Its just a toggle which can be mapped to hotkey anyways using Gnome shortcuts (I think all Eee PC's have a Fn-* hotkey for disabling touchpad). * Automatically adjusting Super-Hybrid-Engine for power savings. The last one is extremely useful part of this application. I've personally written some small scripts to perform this last item in around 30 lines of code. So I personally will not be pursuing eee-control anymore (or updating its spec file although I'm not original submitter). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487281] Review Request: eGroupware - A web-based groupware suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487281 Ruediger Landmann changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||BuildFails --- Comment #8 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-11-02 20:26:13 EDT --- When you have a version of the package that builds, please remove "BuildFails" from the whiteboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648633] Review Request: python-sphinx10 - Python documentation generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648633 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2010-11-02 20:19:46 EDT --- Thanks! Will fix the permissions and also make Pygments BR unconditional (not just for EL-5) when importing New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-sphinx10 Short Description: Python documentation generator Owners: salimma Branches: el5 f13 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648633] Review Request: python-sphinx10 - Python documentation generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648633
Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-11-02
20:02:23 EDT ---
rpmlint:
python-sphinx10.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reStructuredText
-> restructured Text, restructured-text, restructure
python-sphinx10.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US indices ->
induces, indies, indicts
python-sphinx10.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US docstrings -> doc
strings, doc-strings, drawstrings
These are false positives
python-sphinx10.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean
python-sphinx10.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
python-sphinx10.src: W: no-%clean-section
Also false positives -- they're there just in conditionals.
python-sphinx10.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Sphinx-1.0.4-py2.4.egg/sphinx/themes/epub/static/epub.css
Lots of these. I think it's due to the version of setuptools in RHEL5
installing everything with execute permissions. We probably want to run this
in %install:
find %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib} -type f -exec chmod a-x \{\} \;
python-sphinx10.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sphinx-1.0-quickstart
python-sphinx10.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sphinx-1.0-autogen
python-sphinx10.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sphinx-1.0-build
Ignorable -- we can't generate the man pages on EL5.
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 68 errors, 16 warnings.
You can go ahead and do the chmod when you import the package. This review
request is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 496454] Review Request: pwmd - A server for storing application data at a central location
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496454
Ruediger Landmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||r.landm...@redhat.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|r.landm...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-11-02
19:51:00 EDT ---
All looks good here Fabian, although this version is -- understandably -- now
quite old (current upstream is 2.18)
Nevertheless, this version still builds fine locally on F13 for me and on Koji
for F15.
Some items are no longer required in the specfile, so you could remove:
* BuildRoot:
* first line of %install
* empty %build section
* %clean section
(although not having them will cause rpmlint to cry)
ACCEPT
- = N/A
/ = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[/] Rpmlint output is clean:
$ rpmlint SRPMS/pwmd-2.1-1.fc13.src.rpm
pwmd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pinentry -> pin entry,
pin-entry, pinery
pwmd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US syslog -> dyslogia,
systole, slogan
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/pwmd-2.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
pwmd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US syslog -> dyslogia,
systole, slogan
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/pwmd-debuginfo-2.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[/] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[/] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[/] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Language specific
items
[/] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[/] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPLv2+
[/] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
COPYING
[/] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[/] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
md5sum SOURCES/pwmd-2.1.tar.gz
2c770efd19bd96c15e56ffa62e22 SOURCES/pwmd-2.1.tar.gz
$ md5sum ~/Download/pwmd-2.1.tar.gz
2c770efd19bd96c15e56ffa62e22
/home/rlandmann/Download/pwmd-2.1.tar.gz
[/] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2572948
[/] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[/] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly (with the %find_lang macro)
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[/] Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
[/] Package is not relocatable.
[/] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[/] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[-] Permissions on files are set properly
[/] %files section includes a %defattr(...) line
[/] Package consistently uses macros.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[/] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] -devel packages require base package with full versioning.
[/] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[/] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[/] Filenames are valid UTF-8
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[/] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[/] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested through koji
[/] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: f13
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] Subpackages other than -devel require the base package as a fully
versioned
dependency
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct (normally in -devel)
[Bug 484051] Review Request: sockettest - Test My Socket
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484051 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(ita...@ispbrasil. ||com.br) --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 19:30:45 EDT --- This ticket is very confusing. It doesn't seem that there's been a single response from the original submitter, which is unfortunate because it seems at least one other person wants to submit this. I guess what I'll do is make a few comments, and then if the submitter does not reply then I'll close the ticket and let someone else submit this package. The package in the original comment does build OK for me in rawhide. I don't see any of the errors or warnings listed in comment 3. Not sure why; Java isn't really my field. The package really needs to be noarch; I see nothing arch-specific about the package, rpmlint complains about it (no-binary) and the debuginfo package is empty. That would all be fixed with BuildArch: noarch. There are various bits of the spec which are unnecessary in modern Fedora: BuildRoot:, the first line of %install, and the entire %clean section. You should remove them unless you intend to target EPEL with the same spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 484281] Review Request: jets3t - Java toolkit for the Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484281 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(jmatt...@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 19:32:06 EDT --- Well, doesn't look as if we ever saw that updated version, and it's been nearly ten months. I guess I'll close this out soon if there's no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 19:18:17 EDT --- It doesn't appear that there's been any comment from the submitter since March of 2009. Can we just close this now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 512323] Review Request: mingw32-gc - MinGW Windows port of the gc library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512323 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 19:15:50 EDT --- BTW, I note that the comment that a mingw32-gc-devel package needs to be split is completely incorrect; all mingw32 packages are essentially devel packages, and this is reflected by the guidelines. The -static package is required if there's actually a static library packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508316] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber plugin for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 19:14:09 EDT --- Anything happening here? It looks as if there was a willing reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508316] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber plugin for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(rpan...@redhat.co ||m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648633] Review Request: python-sphinx10 - Python documentation generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648633
--- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim
2010-11-02 18:46:36 EDT ---
Turns out there are several more changes needed for EL-5; see spec file for
details. I've tested a Koji build for EL-5 and a local build for F-14
Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/python/python-sphinx10.spec
SRPM URL:
http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/python/python-sphinx10-1.0.4-3.fc14.src.rpm
EL-5 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2572916
- manpage generation disabled
- conditionally re-add BuildRoot and %clean section
- manually create %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib} since EL-5's easy_install
cannot recreate path
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639594] Review Request: scout - A CLI interface to Tomboy notes and Gnote
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639594 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-02 18:17:48 EDT --- scout-0.4-6.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630339] Review Request: python-redis - A Python client for redis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630339 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-02 18:15:52 EDT --- python-redis-2.0.0-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-redis'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-redis-2.0.0-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639594] Review Request: scout - A CLI interface to Tomboy notes and Gnote
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639594 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||scout-0.4-6.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-11-02 18:17:53 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624474] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase - Inflect short English Phrases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624474 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-02 18:14:22 EDT --- perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase-0.04-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase-0.04-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 640344] Review Request: perl-MooseX-InsideOut - Inside-out objects with Moose
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640344 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-02 18:14:17 EDT --- perl-MooseX-InsideOut-0.105-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-MooseX-InsideOut'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MooseX-InsideOut-0.105-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 512323] Review Request: mingw32-gc - MinGW Windows port of the gc library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512323 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 18:12:00 EDT --- Any response to that commentary? I guess I'll close this out if there's no response soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 Henry Kroll changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nos...@thenerdshow.com --- Comment #6 from Henry Kroll 2010-11-02 17:56:29 EDT --- Bump. This font was used in the media art for F14. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/CDArt#Fedora_14_Media_Art and ought to be in the repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 461793] Review Request: spu-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at spu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461793 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 17:40:34 EDT --- I note that none of the links to specs or srpms are valid. I'm guessing this should just be closed out, which is disappointing, but I can't review this and nobody seemed to have the time to help fix the issues. I guess if anyone does what to continue this, please provide working links and clear the whiteboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487080] Review Request: jocaml - Join-calculus extension of Objective Caml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487080 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-11-02 17:35:08 EDT --- I guess so, Michel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 458975] Review Request: Pivy - Coin binding for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|459125(FreeCAD) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|NotReady| Last Closed||2010-11-02 17:27:46 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 17:27:46 EDT --- This has been marked as not ready for review for 27 months now, and there's been no comment for 15 months. I'm closing this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459125] Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|458975 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487080] Review Request: jocaml - Join-calculus extension of Objective Caml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487080 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 17:28:44 EDT --- After being marked "not ready" for well over a year now, can we just close this out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 --- Comment #33 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 17:23:49 EDT --- And after pretty much an entire year, this is still marked as not building. It looks like the previous comment intended to provide a version which builds, but nobody cleared the whiteboard. If this ever does become ready for a review, please clear the whiteboard so that it reappears in the review queue. Otherwise, let's close this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 464757] Review Request: openssl-tpm-engine - OpenSSL engine for TSS API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464757 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 17:21:10 EDT --- And, after a few days short of a year, still marked as not building. I saw that something happened back in April but I don't know if there's still any desire to get this package in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||BuildFails --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 17:15:30 EDT --- Well, it's been well over a year now. Should this just be closed now? In any case it does not build properly on current rawhide: regex.c:34:14: error: static declaration of 'strndup' follows non-static declaration so I'll mark this as not building. Please clear the whiteboard if providing a version that builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 469613] Review Request: gnue-appserver - GNU Enterprise Application Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469613 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|BuildFails | Flag|needinfo?(aar...@garden.org | |) | Last Closed||2010-11-02 17:17:01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||BuildFails --- Comment #27 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 17:10:11 EDT --- Please clear the whiteboard if providing a package which builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 490803] Review Request: emos - Interpolation software and GRIB, BUFR, CREX encoding/decoding routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490803 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||BuildFails --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 16:41:09 EDT --- Please clear the whiteboard when updating with a version that builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 526805] Review Request: lua-loop - Class models for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526805 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 15:30:49 EDT --- Just going over the old review tickets. This one builds fine and rpmlint is silent. As expected for a ticket this old, there are some lines in the spec which are unnecessary on modern Fedora (BuildRoot, first line of %install, the entire %clean section) which I would recommend removing unless you plan to target EPEL with the same spec. I see a comment "# for checks" but I don't see any checks enabled and I don't see anything that's obviously a test suite. Is there one? Do you think that preloader.lua and precompiler.lua, which aren't in the package-specific directory, are problematic? They don't conflict with anything but the names do seem quite generic. I don't know much about Lua, however, so I'll defer to you. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 2c9000f5744ca84b6c0d58bd8fb1d8d71c2841b01a75b3b201a486f88ffda864 loop-2.3-beta.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: lua-loop-2.3-0.1.beta.fc15.noarch.rpm lua-loop = 2.3-0.1.beta.fc15 = /usr/bin/env lua >= 5.1 lua-lpeg >= 0.8.1 lua-loop-doc-2.3-0.1.beta.fc15.noarch.rpm lua-loop-doc = 2.3-0.1.beta.fc15 = lua-loop = 2.3-0.1.beta.fc15 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. ? maybe generically named files * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646836] Review Request: rubygem-bundler - The best way to manage your application's dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646836 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||649028 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-11-02 15:25:21 EDT --- Ah, currently removing vendorlized thor (in bundler gem) breaks bundler gem because of lower version of thor in Fedora than required by bundler... (reported on bug 649028) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641339] Review Request: perl-Const-Fast - Const::Fast Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641339 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2010-11-02 15:18:25 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-11-02 15:18:25 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641341] Review Request: perl-File-Map - Memory mapping made simple and safe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641341 Bug 641341 depends on bug 641339, which changed state. Bug 641339 Summary: Review Request: perl-Const-Fast - Const::Fast Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641339 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647721] Review Request: perl-Reaper - Support for reaping child processes via $SIG{CHLD}
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647721
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-11-02 14:57:09 EDT ---
Thanks!
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Reaper
Short Description: Support for reaping child processes via $SIG{CHLD}
Owners: lkundrak
Branches: f13 f14 el6
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635379] Review Request: perl-POSIX-strptime - Perl extension to the POSIX date parsing strptime(3) function
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635379 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-11-02 14:56:22 EDT --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-POSIX-strptime Short Description: Perl extension to the POSIX date parsing strptime(3) function Owners: lkundrak Branches: f13 f14 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635383] Review Request: perl-WWW-Salesforce - WWW::Salesforce Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635383 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-11-02 14:54:02 EDT --- sorry, SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-WWW-Salesforce.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-WWW-Salesforce-0.13-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635383] Review Request: perl-WWW-Salesforce - WWW::Salesforce Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635383 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-11-02 14:53:22 EDT --- Licensing should be fixed here: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-WWW-Salesforce.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-WWW-Salesforce-0.13-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 587011] Review Request: tboot - uses Intel(R) TXT to perform a measured and verified launch of a kernel/VMM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587011 --- Comment #19 from Tomas Mraz 2010-11-02 14:25:34 EDT --- Package APPROVED from me as well. rpmlint -v tboot-20101005-1.fc13.src.rpm tboot-20101005-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm tboot-debuginfo-20101005-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm tboot.src: I: checking tboot.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pre -> per, ore, pee OK, no typo here tboot.x86_64: I: checking tboot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pre -> per, ore, pee OK, as above tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcp_crtpol tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tpmnv_relindex tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcp_writepol tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcp_crtpol2 tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcp_crtpconf tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tpmnv_lock tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary parse_err tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tpmnv_defindex tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcp_crtpolelt tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcp_mlehash tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcp_crtpollist tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcp_readpol tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary acminfo tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tpmnv_getcap tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tb_polgen tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary txt-stat It would be nice to get the manual pages sooner or later but it does not block the package acceptance. tboot-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648633] Review Request: python-sphinx10 - Python documentation generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648633 --- Comment #8 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-11-02 14:20:32 EDT --- Good: * Package follows naming guidelines * Package licensed appropriately * Spec file readable * Sources match upstream * locales handled correctly * Not a shared library * No bundled libraries * Package owns all directories and files it creates and nothing else * Permissions set properly * Macros used consistently. * code, not content. * Nothing in %doc affects runtime * Not a GUI * All filenames are utf8 Needswork: * Does not build in koji for EL-5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2572200&name=build.log I'd just disable man page generation on EL-5 I think. I'll check rpmlint and that it works properly after that's fixed. Everything else looks fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636654] Review Request: Gorm - The GNUstep graphical interface builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636654 Jochen Schmitt changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2010-11-02 14:19:55 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gorm Short Description: The GNUstep graphical interface builder Owners: foo s4504kr Branches: f14 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 587011] Review Request: tboot - uses Intel(R) TXT to perform a measured and verified launch of a kernel/VMM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587011 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 587011] Review Request: tboot - uses Intel(R) TXT to perform a measured and verified launch of a kernel/VMM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587011 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 235989] Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235989 Alex Lancaster changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bryan.hepwo...@ncl.ac.uk --- Comment #8 from Alex Lancaster 2010-11-02 14:01:08 EDT --- *** Bug 648903 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646836] Review Request: rubygem-bundler - The best way to manage your application's dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646836 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-11-02 14:00:53 EDT --- One question. Did you already find someone who is willing to sponsor you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638590] Review Request: freemind - a mind-mapping software written in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638590 --- Comment #4 from hannes 2010-11-02 13:58:11 EDT --- Ok I hope that I've fixed all problems so far. Sorry for making such basic mistakes, I was busy getting all those deps working. ;-) I don't know what you meant with the wrapper script. If this is the *.sh file I just removed HotEqn from the classpath. I am not sure if I'll need to add more patches to add the right class path in every build*.xml. I'll try to figure it out after my exams. SPEC URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/freemind/freemind.spec SRPM URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/freemind/freemind-0.9.0-0.1.rc10.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 610934] Review Request: go - The Google Go Programming Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610934 --- Comment #9 from Conrad Meyer 2010-11-02 13:28:07 EDT --- It's Brandon's review, not mine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641093] Review Request: keybinder - A library for registering global keyboard shortcuts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641093 hannes changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from hannes 2010-11-02 13:15:25 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: keybinder Short Description: A library for registering global keyboard shortcuts Owners: hannes Branches: f14 f13 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648986] Review Request: python-cups - Python bindings for CUPS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648986 Jiri Popelka changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low CC||jpope...@redhat.com, ||twa...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648987] Review Request: python-smbc - Python bindings for libsmbclient API from Samba
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648987 Jiri Popelka changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low CC||jpope...@redhat.com, ||twa...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648986] New: Review Request: python-cups - Python bindings for CUPS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-cups - Python bindings for CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648986 Summary: Review Request: python-cups - Python bindings for CUPS Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpope...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jpopelka.fedorapeople.org/python-cups.spec SRPM URL: http://jpopelka.fedorapeople.org/python-cups-1.9.52-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides Python bindings for the CUPS API, known as pycups. It was written for use with system-config-printer, but can be put to other uses as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648987] New: Review Request: python-smbc - Python bindings for libsmbclient API from Samba
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-smbc - Python bindings for libsmbclient API from Samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648987 Summary: Review Request: python-smbc - Python bindings for libsmbclient API from Samba Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpope...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jpopelka.fedorapeople.org/python-smbc.spec SRPM URL: http://jpopelka.fedorapeople.org/python-smbc-1.0.10-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides Python bindings for the libsmbclient API from Samba, known as pysmbc. It was written for use with system-config-printer, but can be put to other uses as well. This version can compile against both Python 2.x and Python 3.x so the build of python-smbc emits also python3-smbc subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 165932] Review Request: msmtp - An SMTP Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165932 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 206492] Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206492 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2010-11-02 12:46:21 EDT --- is in fedora, so don't block FE-DEADREVIEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646836] Review Request: rubygem-bundler - The best way to manage your application's dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646836 --- Comment #3 from Jozef Zigmund 2010-11-02 12:45:24 EDT --- Hi Mamoru, i want to request you if you will have time can you check my reviews for these packages, if it's correct? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642583 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642592 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642601 Because I'm not still in Packager group so i made just nonformal reviews. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635383] Review Request: perl-WWW-Salesforce - WWW::Salesforce Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635383 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Mašláňová 2010-11-02 12:46:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > There's problem with license. I couldn't find it in source, it's only on > > web-page. > > Thank you for catching this. I notified upstream. > So what's now? Probably we should wait for license clarification. > > Also removing questions of Makefile.PL is unusual, but that's also this > > Makefile. So this is probably ok. > > I'm really not sure what you mean here. Nevermind. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 266001] Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266001 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|toms...@fedoraproject.org Flag|needinfo?(m...@flyn.org)| Last Closed||2010-11-02 12:43:48 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Spura 2010-11-02 12:43:48 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews#Submitter_not_responding -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 610934] Review Request: go - The Google Go Programming Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610934 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(bran...@pwnage.ca ||) --- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2010-11-02 12:35:13 EDT --- Hi Conrad, There's been several releases -- the last on October 27th. Is there an updated spec I can review? The pointed-out problems with checkout instruction and subpackages are still present in the spec file listed in the request. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 587011] Review Request: tboot - uses Intel(R) TXT to perform a measured and verified launch of a kernel/VMM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587011 Joseph Cihula changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #451567|0 |1 is obsolete|| Flag|needinfo?(joseph.cih...@int | |el.com) | --- Comment #18 from Joseph Cihula 2010-11-02 12:21:44 EDT --- Created attachment 457211 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=457211 tboot spec file for 20101005 build Updated spec file with correct Source0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648973] New: Review Request: dsgui - A free graphical interface for Czech Data Boxes (ISDS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dsgui - A free graphical interface for Czech Data Boxes (ISDS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648973 Summary: Review Request: dsgui - A free graphical interface for Czech Data Boxes (ISDS) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/dsgui/dsgui.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/dsgui/dsgui-1.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: GUI application allowing access to a `Data box' - an electronic communication interface endorsed by the Czech government. $ rpmlint dsgui.spec ../SRPMS/dsgui-1.1-1.fc13.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/dsgui-1.1-1.fc13.noarch.rpm dsgui.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install dsgui.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean dsgui.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag dsgui.spec: W: no-%clean-section dsgui.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install dsgui.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean dsgui.src: W: no-buildroot-tag dsgui.src: W: no-%clean-section dsgui.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dsgui 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. This is post F-11 spec file without obsolete BuildRoot code. This package requires python-dslib that has been submitted for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648973] Review Request: dsgui - A free graphical interface for Czech Data Boxes (ISDS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648973 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||648898 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648898] Review Request: python-dslib - A free Python library for accessing Czech Data Boxes (ISDS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648898 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||648973 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646836] Review Request: rubygem-bundler - The best way to manage your application's dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646836
--- Comment #2 from Jozef Zigmund 2010-11-02 12:17:11 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Some notes:
>
> * ruby(abi) dependency
> - Writing "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" is a must
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines
+ dependency Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8
> * Consistent macro usage
> - As you defined %geminstdir macro, please use this macro also
> in %files section
+ macro %geminstdir in %files section
> * Document files
> - Please mark document files as %doc properly.
> - CHANGELOG.md or so should be marked as %doc
> ---
> CHANGELOG.md
> ISSUES.md
> README.md
> UPGRADING.md
> ---
> - Also, the following files
> ---
> Rakefile
> bundler.gemspec (under %geminstdir, not the one under specifications/)
> spec/
> ---
> are not needed on runtime and should be marked as %doc.
> We usually move these "unneeded" files to -doc subpackage.
+ Add subpackage %files doc with these files, but i'm confused about this line
"bundler.gemspec (under %geminstdir, not the one under specifications/)"
because in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Ruby_Gems, is written:
The package must own the following files and directories:
%{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/
%{gemdir}/cache/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem
%{gemdir}/specifications/%{gemname}-%{version}.gemspec
> - .gitignore file is not needed and should be removed
+ Removed
> * Shipping external project
> - This gem bundles external project (for this package thor)
> under lib/bundler/vendor/. On Fedora shipping external project in
> the same package should (must) be avioded, see:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Bundling_of_multiple_projects
>
> As Fedora already ships rubygem-thor, please remove this vendorlized
> directory and modify scripts in bundler gem to use rubygem-thor rpm.
+Rubygem-thor has already been in fedora repos, so i removed this vendor
directory and add require of this gem to Requires part.
New SPEC file: http://people.redhat.com/jzigmund/rubygem-bundler.spec
New SRPM file:
http://people.redhat.com/jzigmund/rubygem-bundler-1.0.3-2.fc13.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566410] Review Request: snmpcheck - An utility to get information via SNMP protocols
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410 --- Comment #7 from Nikolay Ulyanitsky 2010-11-02 12:16:04 EDT --- > It seems that nobody has picked this review request. Are you still interested in maintaining this package in Fedora? Hi Fabian Yes, of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546445] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check-updates - A Nagios plugin to check if Red Hat or Fedora system is up-to-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546445 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-02 12:14:43 EDT --- nagios-plugins-check-updates-1.4.9-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nagios-plugins-check-updates'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nagios-plugins-check-updates-1.4.9-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 612581] Review Request: spacewalk-backend - Common programs needed to be installed on the Spacewalk servers/proxies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612581 Stanislav Ochotnicky changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #21 from Stanislav Ochotnicky 2010-11-02 12:06:32 EDT --- As we discussed these issues on IRC, I consider them solved/explained. Package is good to go from my POV. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647149] Review Request: perl-Test-Fatal - Incredibly simple helpers for testing code with exceptions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647149 --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth 2010-11-02 11:53:47 EDT --- Try::Tiny is now updated to 0.07 in Rawhide, so this package can now be built for F15. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648945] New: Review Request: maven - Java project management and project comprehension tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maven - Java project management and project comprehension tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648945 Summary: Review Request: maven - Java project management and project comprehension tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: socho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven.spec SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven-3.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Maven is a software project management and comprehension tool. Based on the concept of a project object model (POM), Maven can manage a project's build, reporting and documentation from a central piece of information. Notes for reviewer: This package is installable parallel to maven2 and should not cause any problems. Later on this package will obsolete & provide maven2. Custom resolving such as mvn-jpp is being prepared and will be included in next few revisions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648517] Review Request: enum - Seq- and jot-like enumerator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648517 --- Comment #6 from Ondrej Vasik 2010-11-02 11:10:04 EDT --- That's maybe more question for upstream (https://fedorahosted.org/enum/ ) - I was just asked if I could package it in Fedora (as they recently packaged that in gentoo and debian) - and as I see few things (reversed order, better format support...) as possibly useful, and it is pretty small package, I agreed to package it. Anyway - you are right that most of its funcionality is already present in seq/shuf utilities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 587011] Review Request: tboot - uses Intel(R) TXT to perform a measured and verified launch of a kernel/VMM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587011 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(joseph.cih...@int ||el.com) --- Comment #17 from Tomas Mraz 2010-11-02 11:05:29 EDT --- Please modify the Source0 URL to point to the tarball at sourceforge (of course you'll have to upload the tarball there). Here is the guideline for the SF source urls: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net With that fix the package should comply with the Fedora guidelines. Please apply for the Fedora Packager CVS Commit Group in the Fedora Account system and I will sponsor you. Then you can ask for creating the branches in the Fedora git and import the package into it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546866] Review Request: qffmpeg - Stripped-down fork of ffmpeg for libspice
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546866 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2010-11-02 10:37:17 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-02 10:37:17 EDT --- After some discussion on IRC, it seems this truly isn't necessary. Not to mention the fact that the links are dead anyway. I'll just go ahead and close this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648517] Review Request: enum - Seq- and jot-like enumerator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648517 Pádraig Brady changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@draigbrady.com --- Comment #5 from Pádraig Brady 2010-11-02 10:28:02 EDT --- Note shuf supports generating a random range, and we already have seq. Do we need enum? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
